T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
523.2 | When someone says "Hand me the dykes..." | BLUMON::WAYLAY::GORDON | The gifted and the damned... | Tue Nov 13 1990 12:58 | 3 |
| ...I reach for the diagonal wire cutters.
--D
|
523.3 | | ESIS::GALLUP | unless you intend to use it! | Tue Nov 13 1990 13:51 | 15 |
|
The problem with some sexual terms is that the ones that are
offensive to some are not offensive to others. It's a lose/lose
situation. Take, for example, the words strate and straight in
reference to heterosexual people. Then there are Bisexuals, who like
to be called "bi", but homosexuals don't like "homo" and heterosexuals
don't like "het."
It's a lose, lose situation. I use the ones I'm most comfortable with,
if I offend someone, it's not my intention and I would hope that they
would bring it to my attention.
kathy
|
523.5 | Word games | LRCSNL::WALES | David from Down-under | Tue Nov 13 1990 16:38 | 15 |
| G'Day,
I really can't see anything wrong with using shortened versions of
the accepted terms, het for heterosexual, bi for bisexual etc
especially when we have to type them in. It's not as if we just pick
on one persuasion either, there's an abbreviation for everybodies
choice of lifestyle. We use shortened words for just about everything
else so what's the difference? I can see that many people would get
upset by the use of other terms to describe them, ie dykes, poofters
etc (I don't mean to offend anybody by using them myself).
David (Het, straight, strate - call me what you like - everybody else
does!)
|
523.4 | Moderator Response | COGITO::SULLIVAN | Singing for our lives | Tue Nov 13 1990 17:14 | 22 |
| With regard to the FMO notes issue: we comods can think of no reason
to encourage men-only notes in womannotes, because by definition, they
don't meet the standard of topics of interest to women. We imagine
that some people will see this opinion as a form of censorship, but we
feel that to support something that has nothing to do with the purpose
of this file would be irresponsible of us. We encourage men who wish
to have men-only discussions to propose that idea in Mennotes where the
focus is on male issues.
However, there really are no rules for or against the idea of
men-only notes in Womannotes, so if men choose to start FMO topics,
it's not against any rules, and as individuals, we would honor the
request for courtesy. As moderators, however, we would have to write
in the FMO strings if such a moderator intervention were required. If
the men and women of this community want to modify the Womannotes
guidelines to formally support the idea of For Men Only (FMO) notes
(as a request for courtesy only, though, as in the case of FWO notes),
someone should propose it, and the moderators will facilitate a formal
vote.
Justine for the Womannotes moderators
|
523.6 | | BRABAM::PHILPOTT | Col I F 'Tsingtao Dhum' Philpott | Wed Nov 14 1990 06:33 | 16 |
|
"het" is the accepted abbreviation of "heterodyne"
Whatever else I may be I am not heterodyne (= mixed with different
frequencies).
On the other hand there is a perfectly good word meaning "having more
than one colour" - heterochromatic - which might also be abbreviated to
'het'
---
joking apart I object to non-specific abbreviations which are subject
to misconstruction.
/. Ian .\
|
523.7 | No difference here... | RANGER::R_BROWN | We're from Brone III... | Tue Nov 20 1990 14:39 | 7 |
|
This type of Topic is as sexist and discriminatory as the FWO Topics are.
Whether or not they are supported by the Moderators is irrelevant.
-Robert Brown III
|