T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
507.1 | | BTOVT::THIGPEN_S | freedom: not a gift, but a choice | Mon Nov 05 1990 08:23 | 17 |
| thanks for posting this -- I heard on Friday (nov 2) that the jury
found her innocent after only 2 hrs deliberation.
I heard her interviewed on NPR. She said she was desperate, and that
she got the idea when she saw a man bring his date into the men's room,
and she followed them. (Howcome the date was not arrested, too?)
as an aside, in a previous life I worked for a short time as an
electrician's apprentice. One job had us installing those little
scent-dispensers in restrooms, both men's and women's. Women, you
should know that in the small sample I observed, the women's rooms were
dirty, but the men's rooms were horribly gross. I remember thinking
that the management of these places needed educating...
last word: as my mom always said, you should have gone before we left!
:-)
|
507.2 | I've done that too... | YUPPY::DAVIESA | She is the Alpha... | Mon Nov 05 1990 08:40 | 7 |
|
Judging by a note in Mennotes on the subject of wmn using men's
"restrooms" a LOT of us should have been arrested!
It seems from that string that most men don't seem to mind.....
'gail
|
507.3 | YUCK!!!!! | WFOV12::BRENNAN_N | | Mon Nov 05 1990 09:01 | 7 |
|
Judging from the men's rooms I've been in, I wouldn't want to use
most of them. Outside, around the building sounds good to me.
Of course, rolling up the bottom of your pants works....
Nancy
|
507.4 | pointer | LYRIC::BOBBITT | COUS: Coincidences of Unusual Size | Mon Nov 05 1990 09:10 | 8 |
| please see also:
HUMAN_RELATIONS
1096 - Long lines
-Jody
|
507.5 | the principle of the thing | TLE::D_CARROLL | Hakuna Matata | Mon Nov 05 1990 12:33 | 10 |
| Not the same issue, but related:
Usually when I go to a place where the "restrooms" are simply
bathrooms, ie: no stalls, only one person at a time, I will go in the
one labelled "men", just out of principle. It is ridiculous to have
different bathrooms when the place only holds one person anyway.
Better to have two unisex restrooms so that there will be less of a
line, period.
D1
|
507.6 | Choose the shortest line! | NETMAN::BASTION | Welcome to the Tea Party, Alice | Mon Nov 05 1990 13:46 | 6 |
| at Grendel's Den, in Harvard Square, the restrooms are marked "either"
and "or".
Judi
|
507.7 | | ASDS::BARLOW | Me for MA governor!!! | Mon Nov 05 1990 15:13 | 14 |
|
Boy am I glad I didn't get caught! I forget where I was but I
had to go REALLY badly and the women's line had 10+ women in it!
The men's room was empty, except for my husband. So I went in!
All the women in the line with me encouraged me to do so!
Weird. I can't figure out why they even arrested her! Did some
man complain? Was the room empty?
I'm glad she was aquitted. I don't see the big deal if there was
no one in there anyways. If there was some guy in there, then I
could see the problem. (Peeping Jane)
Rachael
|
507.8 | | FRAGLE::WASKOM | | Mon Nov 05 1990 17:40 | 11 |
| The room was not empty when she entered, and she was unaccompanied by a
male. That seems to be why the original arrest.
I'm convinced that in large gathering areas (arenas, stadiums, ski
areas, airports, and the like), that there need to be about twice as
many "stations" available to women as there are to men, in order for
the relative wait to use facilities to be equal. Women not only take
longer per use, but also seem to have a higher "use per man-hour". But
the writers of building codes don't seem to have noticed this trend.
Alison
|
507.9 | | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Mon Nov 05 1990 17:43 | 7 |
| About 8 years ago the building codes required the same number of
toilets for men and women, and urinals in the men's room. You are
allowed to have more than the required number of toilets, but few
builders bothered. I'm not sure if the building codes have been
changed since then, I know it was being talked about.
--David
|
507.10 | Women allowed ... | SHAPES::SMITHS1 | | Tue Nov 06 1990 09:15 | 9 |
|
I live in the UK - I went to a concert at Wembley Stadium once, and the
queues outside the women's toilets were so long that they actually
"officially opened" the men's toilets to women. There were security
men standing outside them to make sure that nothing funny went on, but
all the same we were allowed in.
Sam
|
507.11 | Wembley | YUPPY::DAVIESA | She is the Alpha... | Tue Nov 06 1990 09:32 | 13 |
|
RE -1
Same here Sam....isn't Wembley the *pits*?
The poor provisioning for wmns toilets is second only to the
pitifully inadequate parking and the impossible traffic problems
after a show.....
Oh yeah - and the horrible, overpriced food....
And the acoustics are unspeakably bad anyway.
(And God forbid some supergroup should be playing the Stadium at the
same time as another one playing the Arena....AAAAARRRRRRRGHHHHHH!)
'gail (who grew up within sound of the Stadium)
|
507.12 | | BOLT::MINOW | Cheap, fast, good; choose two | Tue Nov 06 1990 10:00 | 22 |
| The New York City Marathon has "the world's longest urinal," several hundred
feet of roof gutter (or something similar) near the start. One year,
it was located directly in front of the path that the elite women had
to take to get to the starting line, which made for a lot of amused
non-expressions.
What the marathon folk don't tell you, however, is that the real "world's
longest urinal" is the two mile long Verrazano Narrows Bridge, which
the runners cross at the beginning of the race, and folk (mostly men)
don't particularly worry about ducking behind a car when the need arises
(since most of us drank about a gallon of water a day to prepare for the
race, it arose fairly often.)
This is, of course, a minor problem for the women who make up about 1/4
of the field. While there are several hundered PortaSans at the
start, (i.e., one for about every hundred runners), the lines can
be rather long -- I waited 15 minutes an hour before the start, and visited
some bushes just before the start -- and the marathon staff recognizes
this as a problem.
Martin.
|
507.13 | | CLIPR::STHILAIRE | Food, Shelter & Diamonds | Tue Nov 06 1990 11:02 | 5 |
| re .8, I agree. This is always a problem at rock concerts, huge lines
for the women's room and no line at all for the men's.
Lorna
|
507.14 | 23 minutes? | NOVA::FISHER | Rdb/VMS Dinosaur | Tue Nov 06 1990 11:34 | 6 |
| I heard that the jury only deliberated for 23 minutes. A juror said
that they "were with her all the way" it's just that the formalities
[whatever they were, probably where to sit or where to meet for dinner]
took 23 minutes.
ed
|
507.15 | | TORREY::BROWN_RO | an aesthetic anesthetic | Tue Nov 06 1990 13:18 | 5 |
| One problem with many men's rooms is that there is no doors on the
stalls. So, if you expect privacy...
-roger
|
507.16 | Do What U Must | WR2FOR::COSTELLO_KE | Still Awaiting Mr. Mojo Risin' | Tue Nov 06 1990 15:59 | 13 |
| I've got to give her a hand for fighting this. I think it's pretty
neat that she won.
I've used the men's room many many times, either at Concerts (Hard
rock, and no one there ever seems to mind) or at Candlestick during
the 49er's games. I've gotten caught there and warned that I shouldn't
do it, but they certainly never gave me a ticket. After drinking
about a gallon (so it felt like) of beer, when I gotta go, I gotta
go.
Kel
|
507.17 | | BOLT::MINOW | Cheap, fast, good; choose two | Tue Nov 06 1990 16:50 | 5 |
| At a nationally-televised major marathon a few years ago, the eventual
winner had a bout of diarreha during the race. It was kind of fun to
watch the tv commentators dance around the issue.
Martin.
|
507.18 | Bad humor | IE0010::MALING | Life is a balancing act | Tue Nov 06 1990 18:36 | 8 |
| Re: -.1
I know this is disgusting, but I couldn't resist
> dance around the issue
They wouldn't want to step in it, would they?
|
507.20 | yes, I've used a "men's" room before | GNUVAX::QUIRIY | Christine | Tue Nov 06 1990 22:24 | 13 |
|
While we're on the subject of excrement, one of the janitorial staff
was telling us (those gathered in the smoking lounge) that she got a
really weird call today. Someone in the building had what was
purported to be dog turds in their office and they wanted a janitor to
come and clean it up. The occupant said he brought it in on his boot
but the janitor told us that there were a _number_ of dried turds on
the carpet and that they were very discreet lumps, not smooshed or
smeared the way it usually is when you step in it. We decided that the
whole story wasn't being told. (And I wondered why he didn't just
clean it up himself!)
CQ
|
507.21 | | COBWEB::SWALKER | | Wed Nov 07 1990 09:20 | 7 |
|
> the carpet and that they were very discreet lumps, not smooshed or
uh, I think you mean _discrete_ lumps (although I admit, it's
a lot funnier the other way. I mean, I can just picture this
french poodle...)
|
507.22 | AN END TO THE STORY! | PCOJCT::COHEN | at least I'm enjoyin' the ride | Fri Nov 16 1990 12:16 | 26 |
| This is reprinted without permission from the back of PEOPLE magazine,
November 19, 1990 issue:
DENISE WELLS, 33, the Houston legal assistannt whose bladder captured
the nation's attention last summer, was acquitted Nov. 2 in Houston of
voilating a city ordinance prohibiting members of the opposite sex from
using public restrooms designated for a particular gender. In July,
Wells had been charged and fined $200.00 when, after repeatedly facing
long lines at the women's room, she decided she could wait no more and
marched into the men's room during a George Strait concert at the
Summit, a Houston sports arena. "I hope the cause of women's rest-room
equality continues on," said Wells after her aquittal.
Dubbed Pollygate by the local press, the two-day trial featured expert
witnesses raning from an architect to a urologist testifying on Well's
behalf. One juror, Cindy Stephens, said afterward, "She just did what
she had to do." The trial is estimated to have cost Houston taxpayers
$100,000.
Jus tthought the update was in order!
Jill
|
507.23 | 3:1 | DECWET::JWHITE | joy shared is joy doubled | Fri Nov 16 1990 12:27 | 6 |
|
maybe should go under the 'click' topic, but one of the first
things that got me to see the world differently was an argument
i had with a girlfriend about the number of bathrooms at her law
school.
|
507.24 | | BRABAM::PHILPOTT | Col I F 'Tsingtao Dhum' Philpott | Mon Nov 19 1990 06:23 | 15 |
|
.22 finally explained to me several points - notably why this was a
case of "using the wrong restroom", and why replies mentioned cases of
doing so without arrest.
I happened to discuss it with my cousin over the weekend (he's a
barrister - criminal lawyer - in England) and he pointed out that in
Britain using a restroom of opposite sex designation is not an offense
per se. *However* in most cases anybody doing so could expect to be
prosecuted - not for using the wrong restroom, but for "conduct likely
to cause a breech of the peace".
/. Ian .\
|
507.25 | change building codes.. | 2CRAZY::FLATHERS | Summer Forever | Mon Nov 19 1990 16:14 | 7 |
|
Building codes should be changed for concert halls,stadiums + large
function halls to have 2 ladies rooms to every 1 men's room.
A 2 to 1 ratio should help.
|
507.27 | the studies' been done! | AQUA::EFITE | | Tue Nov 20 1990 13:20 | 12 |
|
Such a study has been done! I don't remember the exact numbers,
but men took a little under a minute, and women took a little over a
minute (including the time it took to open and close the stall doors).
The elapsed time problem is compounded by the fact that women have
smaller bladders than men (to make room for our internal reproductive
organs), and so we need to use the facilities more frequently.
The only restrooms where I don't wait in line, are here at work
:-)! In engineering, the men so outnumber the women, that I usually
have the entire restroom to myself.
|