T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
416.1 | pointers | LEZAH::BOBBITT | water, wind, and stone | Tue Oct 02 1990 17:08 | 9 |
| for supplemental information, see also:
JOYOFLEX
321 - Obscure Measures, anyone?
639 - New Measurements
-Jody
|
416.2 | | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Tue Oct 02 1990 17:34 | 12 |
| So what are inches and pounds?
For some amusement, you might check out the unix command "units".
It does most any unit conversion you could ask for (except
Farenheit to Celcius), and many you've never heard of. It also has
the currency conversion data for sometime in 1980. A few examples:
township 36 square miles
strike 2 bushels
thermie 10^6 calories
For more, look through /usr/lib/units on most unix systems.
|
416.3 | That's a *hot* | GNUVAX::QUIRIY | Note � la mode | Tue Oct 02 1990 20:16 | 11 |
|
I just read this one today in PICA::GARDENING: a Scoville. It
evidently is the unit by which the incendiary powers of hot peppers
are measured. It didn't appear to be a joke.
(If you want to read some real macho noting, check out the hot pepper
note -- it might be the Habanero note -- I think it's 1400. And before
I go, I'd like to send out a big "Hi there" to a read-only noter friend
of mine, with a smile. :-) You know who you are.)
CQ
|
416.5 | Reloaders know grains to oz conversion. | 2B::ZAHAREE | Michael W. Zaharee, RSX Development | Wed Oct 03 1990 11:13 | 11 |
| Yeah, but where does it come from? A grain comes from the average
weight of a grain of wheat.
Actually, there are 437 grains in an ounce which would make it 1/6992
of a pound. I wasn't going to enter this as it hardly strikes me as
Wommanotes material, but when I went to check on the figure I discoverd
that ALL of the Webster's dictionaries in the vacinity of my office
have it incorrectly listed as .002083 oz (~480grains/oz.). What they
mean is .002283oz. I was so shocked that I just had to tell someone.
- M
|
416.7 | another use | GWYNED::YUKONSEC | Leave the poor nits in peace! | Wed Oct 03 1990 11:37 | 5 |
| Grain is also a term used in Pharmacology, in fact that is the way
pain killers and such used to be prescribed. If you look at an aspirin
bottle, it still will usually say "5 grains".
E Grace
|
416.8 | nit | HEFTY::CHARBONND | scorn to trade my place | Wed Oct 03 1990 11:40 | 3 |
| Sorry, there are 437.5 grains in an ounce, not 437.
|
416.9 | | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Wed Oct 03 1990 11:41 | 5 |
| According to the units database, a grain is 1/7000 pound, and
there are 480 grains in an apothecary ounce. (An apothecary pound
is 12 apothecary ounces.)
--David
|
416.10 | 'el' | UTROP1::DRAGSTRA_L | | Wed Oct 03 1990 11:43 | 8 |
| Another old one is 'el'. I don't know it's origin, but as fas as I know
it is short for the Dutch 'elleboog' (elbow). It's approximately 60 cm,
and corresponds with the length from the top of the middle finger till
the elbow. It was used by market-salesmen for measuring
textiles/ribbons etc.
Lindy
|
416.11 | | 2B::ZAHAREE | Michael W. Zaharee, RSX Development | Wed Oct 03 1990 12:48 | 9 |
| It occured to me that the 7000 (437.5) vs 437.0 is probably the result
of some redneck rounding stuff off.
As for 437 vs 480--- nevermind. Time for a dictionary that points this
out.
There's 437 redneck grains in a redneck oz.
- M
|
416.12 | does anyone know... | GEMVAX::KOTTLER | | Wed Oct 03 1990 13:31 | 8 |
|
Isn't the bridge over the Charles River near MIT marked off in units of
some MIT student? I forget the student's name but I think it was some
fraternity stunt from the 60s, and there was an article in the Globe
not too long ago about how he returned 25 years later and remeasured
the bridge in units of himself.
D.
|
416.13 | | NAVIER::SAISI | | Wed Oct 03 1990 13:38 | 1 |
| SMOOTS
|
416.14 | 3xx moots + 1 ear | NUPE::HAMPTON | I don't think so. Homie don't play that! | Wed Oct 03 1990 13:38 | 4 |
|
I think his name was "Moot".
-Hamp
|
416.15 | | NUPE::HAMPTON | I don't think so. Homie don't play that! | Wed Oct 03 1990 13:40 | 5 |
| re .13
Yep, I think it was 'Smoots' not 'Moot'
-Hamp
|
416.17 | | GEMVAX::KOTTLER | | Wed Oct 03 1990 14:34 | 11 |
| .16 -
I seem to remember it was the student himself and not his son who
returned, but maybe the point's smoot...
:-}
Anyway, thanks,
D.
|
416.18 | as I recall it | WMOIS::B_REINKE | We won't play your silly game | Wed Oct 03 1990 14:39 | 5 |
| The son of Smoot did visit the bridge, but when they rebuilt the bridge
Smoot himself returned for a remeasuring. Smoot Jr is indeed taller
than his father.
Bonnie
|
416.20 | Long live the Metric system | GIDDAY::WALES | David from Down-under | Wed Oct 03 1990 19:21 | 7 |
| G'Day,
How do you remember all these strange measures that are so totally
unrelated to each other????
David (Who's glad to live in Metric Australia)
|
416.21 | they are related, _actually_ | AUSSIE::WHORLOW | D R A B C = action plan | Wed Oct 03 1990 20:00 | 14 |
| G'day � ,
Any nation that can handle pints pounds ounces feet miles and B cups
can handle anything.... ;-)
derek
who also lives in metric Australia, but understands these things
(probably because he's old enough ;-) )
|
416.22 | Flow rate? | BIGPAK::BOB | | Thu Oct 04 1990 08:36 | 10 |
| My favorite-
some basic math to develop the relations.
2 weeks = 1 fortnight (we all know that!)
1 barrel = 31 gals. (fermented beverage type)
1 firkin = 1/4 barrel = 7 3/4 gals.
3 7/8 gals. / week = 1 firkin / fortnight (obviously, not enough)
|
416.23 | May I have 35 nails of that calico? | RANGER::LARUE | An easy day for a lady. | Thu Oct 04 1990 09:32 | 4 |
| In Federalist (and probably earlier) times, a valid measure for cloth
was a nail. A nail is equal 2 1/4 inches. I love it.
Dondi
|
416.24 | _almost_ enough to make me like metric | HEFTY::CHARBONND | scorn to trade my place | Thu Oct 04 1990 09:46 | 6 |
| maybe this belongs in the true confessions note but...
I still don't understand the relationship of feet and yards to
'rods' and 'acres' and 'square miles'. (I understand the last,
it's the middle two that throw me.) And then there's 'chains'
and 'sections'. sheesh!
|
416.27 | Cricket pitch in chains | IOSG::EVANSG | | Thu Oct 04 1990 11:46 | 10 |
| re .24
'chains' here in the UK have something to do with the dimensions of
a cricket pitch (don't ask me!) I'll try and get some more details
tonight and post them here tomorrow.
Gilla
(who's German and after 12 years in the UK still doesn't understand
cricket.)
|
416.28 | | GEMVAX::KOTTLER | | Thu Oct 04 1990 13:25 | 3 |
|
womanpower
|
416.30 | ;-) | HEFTY::CHARBONND | scorn to trade my place | Thu Oct 04 1990 13:40 | 3 |
| Never heard 'womanpower' as a unit of measure. Did read
somewhere of a 'milli-Helen', that being the beauty needed
to launch a single ship.
|
416.31 | you wanted obscure... | GEMVAX::KOTTLER | | Thu Oct 04 1990 14:08 | 5 |
|
.30 -
Exactly; you've heard of "manpower" though, haven't you?
|
416.32 | but what is that in Watts? | TLE::D_CARROLL | Assume nothing | Thu Oct 04 1990 14:28 | 12 |
| womanpower
(warning, sexism follows:)
1 womanpower = 3 manpower
Also meansured in units of mountains moved/hour.
:-)
D!
|
416.33 | Probably an urban legend, but a *FUN* urban legend! | PROXY::SCHMIDT | Thinking globally, acting locally! | Thu Oct 04 1990 14:30 | 12 |
| > <<< Note 416.16 by VMSSG::NICHOLS "Herb: CSSE support for VMS at ZK" >>>
> -< Is there a tech grad in the house? >-
>
> I sort of remember the distance across the bridge (which by the way
> for some strange reason was called the Harvard bridge when I was a boy)...
As I've heard the story, they were going to name the bridge the M.I.T.
Bridge, but when the civil engineering students took a close look at
the bridge, they were so appalled by its shody design and construction
that they got it named after Harvard instead.
Atlant
|
416.34 | | PROXY::SCHMIDT | Thinking globally, acting locally! | Thu Oct 04 1990 14:31 | 3 |
| And before anybody every gets any wrong ideas, no, I'm no tech grad.
Atlant
|
416.35 | | SA1794::CHARBONND | scorn to trade my place | Thu Oct 04 1990 14:42 | 8 |
| re .31 >Exactly; you've heard of "manpower" though, haven't you?
Touch� ! (I even worked for a temp agency called 'Manpower, Inc')
Simply didn't make the connection. And now that I think of it,
there's 'man-hours' but I've never run across 'woman-hours'.
Dana
|
416.36 | | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Thu Oct 04 1990 15:10 | 2 |
| A chain is 66 feet (as opposed to a cord, which is 128 cubic
feet.)
|
416.38 | more trivia | IAMOK::ALFORD | I'd rather be fishing | Thu Oct 04 1990 15:59 | 11 |
|
re: back a few...
a 'rod' is 5.0292 meters
didn't a foot used to be 'the kings foot' which of course varied
from king to king...and and inch was the length of the kings
index finger between the first and second knuckle???
deb
|
416.39 | what's that in cubits ? | HEFTY::CHARBONND | scorn to trade my place | Thu Oct 04 1990 16:04 | 4 |
| re .38 >a 'rod' is 5.092 meters
Please Deb fertheluvvapete don't talk metric to me :-) I'm
allready confused!
|
416.40 | What kind of barley? Bier? | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Thu Oct 04 1990 16:06 | 3 |
| Nah. An inch is three grains of barley laid end to end.
Ann B.
|
416.41 | | BOLT::MINOW | Cheap, fast, good; choose two | Thu Oct 04 1990 16:42 | 10 |
| 1 rod 16.5 feet
4 rods 1 chain
As I vaguely recall, 1 rod is the width of a typical New England back
road (such as Rt 117).
My favorite unit of distance measurement, uniquely American, is the "hour"
as in "it's 4� hours between Boston and New York City."
Martin.
|
416.42 | | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Thu Oct 04 1990 16:46 | 4 |
| Actually, hour as a unit of distance is incomplete. I specify
distance in dollars and hours. Unfortunately this is a poor metric
as a single distance can be specifyed as several different dollar,
hour pairs depending on the method of travel.
|
416.43 | If you've ever read "The Monkey Wrench Gang" you know... | BLUMON::WAYLAY::GORDON | The owls are not what they seem... | Thu Oct 04 1990 17:17 | 4 |
| ... that distance is measured in six-packs.
--D
|
416.44 | See I said I was old.... 8-( | AUSSIE::WHORLOW | D R A B C = action plan | Thu Oct 04 1990 21:09 | 49 |
| G'day,
Lets see if we can explain a few imperial things...
One inch was the length of the King's thumb top joint.
12 inches = 1 foot
3 feet = 1 yard
22 yards = 1 chain
10 chains = 1 furlong ( a furrowlong was the distance a plough horse
(or ox) could pull a plough in a given time = 220 yards)
8 furlongs = 1 mile. = 1760 yards = 5280 feet = 63360 inches.
A rod, pole or perch is an area of 1 square chain as I recall
( but those I forget) which = 1/10 acre.
An acre is 4840 square yards or 220 yards by 22 yards or a furlong by a
chain. or about the size of a soccer field. (100 yards by 50y)
A cricket pitch was 22 yards between stumps.
An English halfpenny was one inch in diameter
5 english pennies weighed an ounce
there are 16 ounces in a pound avoirdupois (french to have peas?)
there are 12 ounces in a pound troy (gold weight)
There are 20 ounces of pure water in an english pint, hence a pint of
pure water weighs a pound and a quarter. A gallon has 8 pints and hence
weighs 10 pounds, except in the US where a pint has 16 ounces and
weighs a pound. A gallon in the US weighs 8 pounds.
A cubic foot of water weighs 62.25 pounds(uk)approx but I may be corrected here.
and hence = 6.25 gallons.
(quick calculation.... or how to make metric work for you...
1 inch=2.54 cm. 12 inches = 30.48 cm
1 cubic foot = (30.48*30.48*30.48)/1000 litres.= 28.316846 l
a litre weighs 2.2 pounds * 28.316846 = 62.29706 pounds.
end of qc )
derek
|
416.46 | Notice the unit of measurement tehee ;{) | WMOIS::M_KOWALEWICZ | Tremendous Terrence, hero of space. | Fri Oct 05 1990 11:36 | 12 |
|
There are tecno-weenies with a sense of humour....
$ MCR SYSGEN
SYSGEN> SHOW TIMEPROMPTWAIT
SYSGEN>^Z
$
Kbear
|
416.47 | one of my favorite subjects actually | NOVA::FISHER | still dis-tneiro-ed | Fri Oct 05 1990 13:33 | 23 |
| re: "there are 16 ounces in a pound avoirdupois (french to have peas?)
there are 12 ounces in a pound troy (gold weight)"
But do not for one minute think that the ounces in the above statements
are the same. The troy or apothecary ounce is 31.103 grams whilst the
avoirdupois ounce is 28.349 grams.
On a lighter side, I now understand the difference between british
and american pints. 20 ounces of pure water in a brit pint but
20 ounces of charles river water in an american pint which makes
a smaller volume which would equal only 16 ounces of pure water...
No? Oh, well, I thought I understood it. :-)
Actually because the ounces are all screwed up, the british 20 ounce
pint is only about 6/5 bigger than an american 16 ounce pint.
Noone has mentioned the gill which was 5 brit fluid ounces or
half a brit cup or 1/4 a brit pt. I've been told that one can
buy american measuring cups in Britain. Probably the ones that
have metric stuff on "the other side" which is good if your left
handed, etc.
ed
|
416.48 | a speck is < a peck | BTOVT::THIGPEN_S | I donwanna wearatie | Fri Oct 05 1990 13:42 | 9 |
| does anyone know what a "gill" is? it's a volume measure, applied to
liquids, I have a book by the "old woodsman", aka Nessmuk, that uses
the term in discussing camp cooking.
and how the heck much is a peck o'peppers? is it related to bushels?
and then there's that measure made famous in my husband's family by his
mother: the Speck. As in,
"Have just a speck more stuffing, there's just a speck left!"
|
416.50 | This is only a slight embellishment of actual quotes -- honest! | PROXY::SCHMIDT | Thinking globally, acting locally! | Sun Oct 07 1990 17:42 | 15 |
| Re: .45
-d:
> All of this leads me to wonder for the several-millionth time why the
> hell the US holds so tenaciously to a mishmash of obsolete measurement
> systems that cost us billions of dollars in trade imbalance.
Uhh, because Metric is a well-know communist plot, another scheme
by left-wing radical lesbian feminist one-world government types
to confuse good upstanding American youth, so as to render them
incapable of performing arithmetic and simple measurements such
as knowing how big 6 inches is.
Atlant
|
416.51 | fl oz= avoirdupois oz (close enough for governmrnt work.. | AUSSIE::WHORLOW | D R A B C = action plan | Sun Oct 07 1990 20:29 | 12 |
| G'day,
Re -.a_couple
there are 4 gills to a pint. so to me, being English, there are 5 fl oz
to a gill.
there again, according to Murphy, units will always be expressed inthe
most inconvenient form
like acceleration in furlongs per fortnight�
derek
|
416.53 | | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Mon Oct 08 1990 14:36 | 4 |
| Gills are important, as teh standard drink in Ireland is 1/6 gill.
A useful constant: pi seconds in a nanocentury. It's remarkably
accurate. Also, the speed of light is one ft/nanosecond.
|
416.54 | | RDVAX::COLLIER | Bruce Collier | Mon Oct 08 1990 16:29 | 5 |
| In re: .51
Furlongs per fortnight would only measure velocity.
|
416.55 | and a nautical mile is 6080 or 6078 feet depending... | AUSSIE::WHORLOW | D R A B C = action plan | Mon Oct 08 1990 21:57 | 29 |
| G'day
>>like acceleration in furlongs per fortnight�
^ there is a superscript 2
here.......
pi is 3.142, a nanocentury is 3.1536 seconds (based on 365 day years)
(or 3.15576 based on 365.25 day years
or .367% error in the former case.
assuming you live to 3 score years and ten, @ pi sec/ncentury,
you would be 32.22 hours younger.....(or is that older??)
in Australia, there is a quantity called 'fluey dancers'
there are 20 fluey dancers to a pint.....
derek
ps
a score is 20
there are 4 quires to a ream
an increase in sound level of 3 decibels is 6 times louder (?)
|
416.56 | skosh or takusan? | FRAGIL::HOWARD | | Tue Oct 09 1990 08:15 | 1 |
| An order of magnitude ? How much is that?
|
416.59 | I'm otherwise out of the measurement trivia biz. | 2B::ZAHAREE | Michael W. Zaharee, RSX Development | Tue Oct 09 1990 11:48 | 6 |
| re: .57
I thought an "order of magnitude" was a factor of 16 for programmers and
a factor of 8 for REAL programmers.
- M
|
416.60 | 15 cm! But that sounds much *BIGGER* (?!?) | PROXY::SCHMIDT | Thinking globally, acting locally! | Tue Oct 09 1990 13:27 | 16 |
| > <<< Note 416.52 by SMURF::BINDER "Recherche du Sox perdu" >>>
> -< It's common knowledge! >-
> Should I understand by this that we still use these asinine
> measurement systems because it's the manly, red-blooded American
> thing to do?
-d:
That's certainly one possible reason. It's been years since "We use
our old system of measures because it makes good economic sense" went
out of fashion as the reason. As I understand it, we're now one of
two countries left on the planet with the old system of measures and
the other country is not exactly a major power.
Atlant
|
416.62 | skosh = "a little" | OXNARD::HAYNES | Charles Haynes | Tue Oct 09 1990 14:54 | 3 |
| I believe "skosh" comes from the Japanese "skoshi" which means "little".
-- Charles
|
416.63 | | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Tue Oct 09 1990 16:26 | 2 |
| A nautical mile is one of the more sensible units -- it's one
minute of lattitude. That makes life easier on navigators.
|
416.64 | | AUSSIE::WHORLOW | D R A B C = action plan | Tue Oct 09 1990 20:04 | 29 |
| G'day
>A nautical mile is one of the more sensible units -- it's one
>minute of lattitude. That makes life easier on navigators.
just to nit a while....
It's a minute of arc on any Great Circle, ie all lines of Longitute,
The Equator and any of the infinite number of other Great Circles. That
is assuming the world is round, rather than the oblate spheroid, we
know it to be....
Actually, since the imperial quantities were born of use, rather than
academia, they are of practical size. When measuring say a window
frame, its size in inches is easily understood and perceived. When
measured in mm, it is hard to visualise; measured in cm, the only
available fractions are .1s ie mm, whereas in inches we can freely be
as accurate as we can measure. (given that carpenters dont use
micrometers....)
and saying my son is 6feet 2 inches is workable - he may be 6 ft 2.0398
in, but we dont need to know it that accurately to perceive how tall he
is. 1870mm is too accurate and 187cm gives no chance...
IMHO, naturellment!
derek
|
416.65 | obscurities | TALLIS::JBELL | Zeno was almost here | Tue Oct 09 1990 23:10 | 15 |
| My favorite unit of measure:
The barn-megaparsec.
It's the volume of a box that is about the cross section of a proton
and 3.26 million light years long. It works out to a cup or two.
Astrophysicists use it to estimate the probability of particle
collisions in deep space.
My least favorite unit of measure:
BTUs per pound-mass degree rankine
It's the unit of heat capacity to non-metric persons.
|
416.66 | minor rathole? | AUSSIE::WHORLOW | D R A B C = action plan | Tue Oct 09 1990 23:24 | 14 |
| G'day,
My most favourite measure...
place fingers out in front to apparently indicate 'a little' distance
- from outside of one finger - all the way round the world to the back of
the other finger how much the familty love each other... That much..
least favourite measure - the one that spins under my feet and says
'one at a time please'
derek
|
416.67 | | JURAN::TEASDALE | | Wed Oct 10 1990 14:02 | 6 |
| Anybody have a conversion for serving spoon (or table spoon) to
Tablespoon?
How's about coffee spoon (tea spoon) to teaspoon?
Nancy
|
416.68 | | SSGBPM::KENAH | I am the catalyst, but not the poison | Wed Oct 10 1990 14:06 | 3 |
| three teaspoons = one tablespoon
andrew
|
416.69 | the while | GEMVAX::KOTTLER | | Wed Oct 10 1990 14:06 | 5 |
|
My daughter used to measure time in "whiles". If we asked her when
something was going to happen, she'd say, "In about six whiles."
D.
|
416.71 | The serenity prayer only takes me so far... | CSC32::CONLON | Cosmic laughter, indeed... | Wed Oct 10 1990 15:11 | 7 |
|
Infinitube...
The distance I feel like smashing my fist through my workstation
tube when I see someone goading others at a time when most of us
are damn reluctant to fight back.
|
416.73 | and of course, there's the imperial billion vs the US equivalent... | SNOBRD::CONLIFFE | Cthulhu Barata Nikto | Wed Oct 10 1990 15:25 | 7 |
| I've always liked the �sagan� as a unit of size, eg "There were sagans of
people at the beach" or "there's about a one-in-sagan chance of that idea
working!!!"
One Sagan, of course, is 'billions and billions'...
Nigel
|
416.74 | | GEMVAX::KOTTLER | | Wed Oct 10 1990 16:02 | 3 |
|
what about a "pinch" ?
|
416.75 | more oddities | GODIVA::bence | The hum of bees... | Wed Oct 10 1990 16:43 | 31 |
|
I don't know if it differs from a "coffee spoon", but
1 coffee measure = 2 Tablespoons
I've sometimes seen a pinch defined as 1/8 teaspoon.
A few other obscure measures
1 pennyweight = 24 grains
1 hundredweight = 112 pounds
1 kip = 1000 pounds
1 barrel = 31.5 gallons
1 hogshead = 2 barrels
1 butt = 2 hogsheads
1 puncheon (wine) = 84 gallons
1 puncheon (beer) = 72 gallons
1 tun = 8 barrels
1 palm = 3 inches
1 hand = 4 inches
1 span = 9 inches
1 cubit = 18 inches
1 pace = 2.5 feet
1 ell = 4 feet
1 fathom = 5.5 yards
1 pole, rod = 2 yards
1 furlong = 220 yards
1 cable = 120 fathoms
1 league = 3 miles
|
416.76 | Cajun teaspoon | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Wed Oct 10 1990 16:46 | 13 |
| There's always the "Cajun teaspoon", used when measuring Tabasco
sauce, as follows (example assumes recipe calls for 2 tsp):
1. Hold teaspoon over bowl with other food
2. Open top of Tabasco sauce, start pouring into teaspoon
3. When teaspoon is full, invert teaspoon to empty its contents
into the bowl. Do *not* change the orientation of the bottle
of Tabasco when doing this, so it keeps pouring.
4. Repeat for second teaspoon called for. (Or third or whatever)
5. Only straighten Tabasco bottle when all teaspoons are accounted
for.
To see a master at work doing this, watch Justin Wilson on TV.
|
416.77 | | COBWEB::SWALKER | it's not easy being green... | Wed Oct 10 1990 17:00 | 5 |
|
Cathy, a fathom is 6 feet (or 1.83 meters), not 5.5 yards.
Sharon (who's a fathom tall...)
|
416.78 | and my dictionary says a cubit is a measure of 17 to 22 inches | BANZAI::FISHER | Oakland swept, so what | Thu Oct 11 1990 10:08 | 8 |
| .75 was confused.
A fathom = 2 yards.
A rod or pole is 5.5 linear yards or 30.25 square yards.
Nobody mentioned the em and the en. Doesn't anyone do crossword
puzzles?
ed
|
416.79 | Dash it all | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Thu Oct 11 1990 10:15 | 14 |
| But, Ed, the em and en depend on the font and the point size.
point - one twelfth of a pica (ISO 6429 declares one seventy-second
of an inch)
pica - .166000 inches
corps - .178 inches
didot - one twelfth of a corps
decididot - .0376 mm. as ISO 6429 declares
Ann B.
|
416.80 | 1 scruple = 20 grains | WMOIS::M_KOWALEWICZ | the 3DBB knows all | Thu Oct 11 1990 10:53 | 6 |
|
My favorite is the Scruple. I like to draw the symbol for
scruples on a paper and give it to deserving souls who are missing some
scruples.
8{) 8{) 8{) Kbear
|
416.81 | still like the em and en | NOVA::FISHER | Oakland swept, so what | Thu Oct 11 1990 13:50 | 9 |
| re:.79, sure the em and en depend on the type measure but they are also
more ambiguous than "pint," "gill," etc. and less ambiguous than
"ounce." That's what makes them so much fun. I've gotten at least 3
different definitions over the years, all from printers.
Are points now 72 pts/inch? They were a little bit smaller 12 years
ago (the difference was small indeed). Now, where's that pica pole?
ed
|
416.82 | And unused | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Thu Oct 11 1990 13:59 | 4 |
| The ISO point is 1/72 inch. (This is what Digital, Adobe, etc.
use.) The really, truly printer's point remains unchanged.
Ann B.
|
416.83 | Another ambiguous measure | RDVAX::COLLIER | Bruce Collier | Thu Oct 11 1990 17:19 | 7 |
|
A summer camp in Michigan I attended as a boy by two brothers named
Furlong, one a year ahead of me, one a year behind. They immediately
and perpetually became known as Little Furlong and Big Furlong, and I
don't think anyone learned their usual first names.
- Bruce
|
416.84 | | LYRIC::BOBBITT | COUS: Coincidences of Unusual Size | Mon Oct 15 1990 11:28 | 6 |
|
here's one I just learned about - the Dalton. It's the mass of a
single hydrogen atom....
-Jody
|