T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
389.1 | | PROXY::SCHMIDT | Thinking globally, acting locally! | Wed Sep 19 1990 16:53 | 5 |
| Ro:
Care to tell us the school system? Off-line by mail if you wish.
Atlant
|
389.2 | he probably wanted a 'strait-edge woman' anyway ... | YGREN::JOHNSTON | bean sidhe | Wed Sep 19 1990 17:01 | 9 |
| oooh! goody! can I be the 'ruler girl'? After _years_ of convent schools I
certainly know what they're for...
you mean the 'ruler girl' doesn't get to whack folks into line for wrong
thinking?
Never mind ...
Annie
|
389.3 | grump | DECWET::JWHITE | the company of intelligent women | Wed Sep 19 1990 17:04 | 3 |
|
the teacher should be reprimanded
|
389.4 | | CVG::THOMPSON | Aut vincere aut mori | Wed Sep 19 1990 17:14 | 6 |
| re: .0 So what are you going to do about it? If it happened in my
son's school I'd have been in the principal's office first thing the
next morning. And that teacher would have a surprise when contract
renual time came as well.
Alfred
|
389.5 | agh! | COBWEB::SWALKER | lean, green, and at the screen | Wed Sep 19 1990 17:15 | 12 |
|
I'd complain too.
I tended to play your daughter's part in classes and was often asked
that same question about being a "women's libber". I find the term
"women's libber" itself offensive, and it took me years to come up
with an appropriate response:
"That depends. Are you one of those male chauvenist pigs?"
Sharon
|
389.6 | How far have we really come, baby? | ICS::STRIFE | | Wed Sep 19 1990 19:55 | 29 |
| I definitely think the teacher chould be called to task. However,
if you choose to do that, be prepared for retribution against your
daughter -- subtle or not so subtle. I'm not saying don't do it,
just be watching for signs of problems which you will have to
counter. Also, I'd be sure that your daughter is comfortable with
your intervention. She may want to handle the situation herself.
Unfortunatley, the behavior probably isn't all that uncommon. When
Stacy (my daughter) was studying culinary arts in high school she had
to go to the Dean and have him intervene because the head chef would
not teach the girls in the class to carve meat. She has also run into a
number of very sexist professors while at college. (She's studying
hotel/restaurant management, a field which is not noted for progressive
attitudes.) She's informed more than one of the prof's -- in front of the
class -- that his attitudes, comments etc. were inappropriate. So far she
hasn't paid the potential price for calling it as she sees it -- maybe
because she's an A student -- but she's well aware that she's taking that
risk and counts on me to back her up if it becomes necessary.
I think you should be VERY PROUD that you have a daughter that will
stand up for what is right even when it is not the popular thing to do.
That's particularly difficult at her age when peer pressure is SO
strong. She's doing it in a way -- and with a sense of humor yet --
that not only gives the offender a message but shoudl get some of her
clasmates thinking. Give yourself a big pat on the back for raising
this young lady.
Polly
|
389.7 | Assume the worst? | EXPRES::GILMAN | | Thu Sep 20 1990 09:20 | 6 |
| I agree that the remark about the woman writing it therefore remark was
of base, but the rulergirl remark.... give me a break, many times when a
man associates a gender to a function/job some 'feminist' jumps on you.
How do you know that a rulerGIRL vs. a ruler person was not intended as
a neutral comment rather than assuming that it was some sort of put
down? Jeff
|
389.8 | Uh Oh | EXPRES::GILMAN | | Thu Sep 20 1990 09:36 | 12 |
| Uh Oh I used the feminist word in my last reply. I guess I am a male
chauvenist pig. How does one refer to women and men who are
particularly aware of equal rights issues? Is there an appropriate
inoffensive term?
I think all of us are in some ways sexist in that we have all learned
and carry around SOME gender oriented attitudes. Its those that are
outspoken about it or truely unwilling to listen to others opinions
regarding it (in other words closed minded about it) that I would label
'libest, or male chauvenist pig'.
Jeff
|
389.9 | | CADSE::MACKIN | Our data has arrived! | Thu Sep 20 1990 09:47 | 9 |
| <<< Note 389.8 by EXPRES::GILMAN >>>
-< Uh Oh >-
>>> How does one refer to women and men who are
>>> particularly aware of equal rights issues? Is there an appropriate
>>> inoffensive term?
What's wrong with "intelligent?"
Jim
|
389.10 | Pendulum swings at the right time and place | WMOIS::MACMILLAN | | Thu Sep 20 1990 09:58 | 18 |
| My children attend the Quabbin regional in Barre. My daughter Jill
reported to the family, at our usual suppertime banter session, that her
advanced history teacher made one of the male students count the number of
females in the class as well as the number of males. Males were somewhat
outnumbered. The teacher, a young woman, wanted to be sure he appreciated the
implications of the ratio of young women to young men or at least what she
felt were the implications.
There is sexism in our public schools. Judging from what my kids report
I'd say MOSTLY DIRECTED AGAINST YOUNG WOMEN...but the pendulum swings.
My advice to my son should he ever make advanced history is to keep
his mouth shut and do the best he can. My lifes experience has taught me
that depending on the time and place certain bigotries can be attacked and
certain others cannot.
MAC
|
389.11 | inquiring minds want to know | TLE::D_CARROLL | Assume nothing | Thu Sep 20 1990 12:31 | 14 |
| >advanced history teacher made one of the male students count the number of
>females in the class as well as the number of males. Males were somewhat
>outnumbered. The teacher, a young woman, wanted to be sure he appreciated the
>implications of the ratio of young women to young men or at least what she
>felt were the implications.
Duuhhh...I'm missing something here. Are you saying that the advanced
history teacher was acting in a sexist way? And if so, against whom? Or
are you saying she was pointing out sexism? Or...?
And what did the teacher feel the implications *were* about having more
women than men in the class?
D!
|
389.12 | Sorry I was so unclear.. | WMOIS::MACMILLAN | | Thu Sep 20 1990 13:41 | 26 |
| The teacher wanted the boy to see substantially more young women
in her class than young men and accept from that, that young women were
somehow smarter.
I would be just as angered if a teacher made a black child count
the number of whites, a Jewish child count the number of non Jewish children,
a poor child count the number of wealthier children to the implication that
the child counting was somehow inferior. Bigotry is bigotry and that exercise
smacks loudly of it.
Just the act of having a child submit to that in front of his classmates
says a lot, in my mind, about that teacher. I'm sure the young man in question
will long remember the experience.
In fairness to the teacher in question: she was somewhat provoked by
the young mans reluctance to accept some of her historical contentions;
particularly concerning women's historical contributions.The discussion at
the time , if memory serves me right, was around the Senecca Falls meeting.
I've no doubt that sexism is mainly directed at young women in the
school rather than the young men. As a matter of fact this was the first
time I'd ever heard of a 'school related incident' such as this one.
MAC
|
389.13 | Thanks for fixing your, er, elision | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Thu Sep 20 1990 14:26 | 13 |
| Mac,
Well, think about it slightly differently. How would you feel if
a teacher made a white child� count the number of blacks, or made
a Christian child� count the number of Jews? Especially if it
pointed out that the child was outnumbered? Does this seem the
same to you or does it seem different? (You don't have to reply,
but you should come to a conclusion.)
� Who had just made racist remarks
� Who had just made anti-Semitic remarks
Ann B.
|
389.14 | The same...wrong anyway you look at it? | WMOIS::MACMILLAN | | Thu Sep 20 1990 15:51 | 5 |
| Ann, if I understand your question....the same.
I didn't quite understand the bottom two lines of your note.
Mac
|
389.15 | I know nothing for sure..such is my humaness | WMOIS::MACMILLAN | | Thu Sep 20 1990 15:54 | 6 |
| oops ...I just got the connection Ann. I still contend that fighting
bigotry with bigotry is counterproductive; it tends to entrench rather
than enlighten, I think. I guess. My lifes experience seems to suggest
anyway.
MAC
|
389.16 | | WMOIS::B_REINKE | We won't play your silly game | Thu Sep 20 1990 15:55 | 11 |
| Mac
they are footnotes...
a white child - who had just made a racist remark
a Christian child - who had just made an antisemitic remark..
i.e. to point out to some one who is acting in a prejudiced
fashion the falsity of their prejudice...
Bonnie
|
389.17 | | ICS::STRIFE | | Thu Sep 20 1990 16:26 | 11 |
| Re .8
Unless Ro's daughter is in an all girl school, I have a hard time
understanding why the teacher would designate taking care of the
rulers as a "girl's job". Why not ask for a volunteer -- male or
female -- to be the ruler person? And, after the teacher's comment
about the author of the text book and his subsequent remark about
cigarette girls in Las Vegas, it's a bit tough for me to read "ruler
girl" as a non-sexist comment.
Polly
|
389.18 | and no, my own cats are not declawed -- I respect them too much | YGREN::JOHNSTON | bean sidhe | Thu Sep 20 1990 16:40 | 13 |
| Actually, the interchange that set my knees to twitching and my teeth
to grinding from .0 was the "I like you ... are you a womens libber?"
OK, OK, I know that I come with my own filters; but it is evocative of
the clever-little-kitten-flexing-her-harmless-little-claws crap that I
lived with for years.
Being a 'libber' is cute and precocious for the present; but there is the
none too thinly veiled warning that it will get old oh so quickly and that
truly clever girls will put a sock in it real quick.
Indeed clever little kittens who don't learn not to use their claws upon
becoming cats frequently have them surgically removed ...
|
389.19 | yaaaaaaaa | SQM::EZ2USE::BABINEAU | nb | Thu Sep 20 1990 17:20 | 14 |
|
In .18 dear YGREN::JOHNSTON,
You've expressed that so well and I've tried to put words around
those feelings for years!!!!
""clever-little-kitten-flexing-her-harmless-little-claws crap" - I LOVE IT
I always got this attitude from guys, in high school I was the first girl to
enroll EVER in mechanical drawing class. The mouths were dropping open on that
first day of school, believe me, but they got used to it, and I got straight As.
My own daughter has not relayed this type of story about school yet but I am
not sure she is quite listening enough right now. -N
|
389.20 | ex | ICS::STRIFE | | Thu Sep 20 1990 17:24 | 3 |
| .18
Excellent point!
|
389.21 | | RUBY::BOYAJIAN | Danger! Do Not Reverse Polarity! | Fri Sep 21 1990 04:35 | 14 |
| re:.12
� The teacher wanted the boy to see substantially more
young women in her class than young men and accept from
that, that young women were somehow smarter. �
That just goes to show that it all comes down to interpretation.
You say "The teacher wanted". How do *you* know what the teacher
wanted? The minute I read the description of that incident, the
point that flashed through my mind wasn't that she was trying to
point out that "young women were somehow smarter", but that young
women weren't *dumber*.
--- jerry
|
389.22 | Hello Jerry | WMOIS::MACMILLAN | | Fri Sep 21 1990 09:05 | 15 |
| re .21
Jerry the teacher made it quite clear concerning the point she
was trying to make. According to my daughter she stated it. The
young women in the class loved it; the young man in question just
got angrier and I don't know what the reaction of the remaining males
was.
I wasn't there of course but I trust my Jill's account pretty much.
Is is hard to accept that a case such as this could happen?
If so, why?
MAC
|
389.23 | | RUBY::BOYAJIAN | Danger! Do Not Reverse Polarity! | Fri Sep 21 1990 09:47 | 8 |
| re:.22
OK, but you didn't explain that in your original note. You stated
originally that the teacher "made it clear what the implications
of the ratio" meant without explicitly stating what those implications
were. Based on what you actually posted, I derived my interpretation.
--- jerry
|
389.24 | Sorry Jerry | WMOIS::MACMILLAN | | Fri Sep 21 1990 13:14 | 3 |
| sorry Jerry I'm not the clearest noter at times.
MAC
|
389.25 | a mutual decision | ATSE::FLAHERTY | The Hug Therapist | Fri Sep 21 1990 17:17 | 29 |
| Hi Atlant,
We've been discussing what to do about the chauvenism displayed by
the math teacher. I told Kendra that a member of the Nashua school
board was interested in investigating this further. Kendra said
"Getting him into trouble would not change his attitude. It might
shut him up out of fear, but underneath he'd still believe the
same. This is a challenge for me and I want to show him by
speaking up when he makes those statements."
I think this will be a learning experience for both Kendra and the
teacher. She will learn that you have to work with a lot of people
with dinosaur attitudes in life, but it IS possible to be successful
without compromising your beliefs or behavior. Perhaps the teacher
will learn that the most lasting impressions made on students have
less to do with the subject matter and MORE to do with how one
delivers the information and who they are as a role model.
However, I intend to monitor the situation closely and take action if
necessary. I DO intend to let him know (with humor) that I'm aware
of his behavior at the next parent/teacher conference. One thought
both Kendra and I have had is that maybe he is playing devil's advocate
to raise the students' consciousness...
I will also post this note in the file.
Thanks for your concern,
Ro
|
389.26 | | MOMCAT::CADSE::GLIDEWELL | Wow! It's The Abyss! | Sat Sep 22 1990 00:29 | 16 |
| Ro ,
Good luck to Kendra. One bright child! And if she tires
of you folks, she can come and stay with me. :) :)
> ... I DO intend to let him know (with humor) that I'm aware
> of his behavior at the next parent/teacher conference.
Draw your decision tree before the conference. Otherwise, when
you let him know (with humor) that you are aware, he may humor
you back in some truly offensive way: "What a shame Kenra's
not Ken" or something that reeks equally.
> ... maybe he is playing devil's advocate
Yes, teachers do that. For about ten minutes at a time.
|
389.27 | Way to go Kendra!!! | BPOV04::MACKINNON | ProChoice is a form of democracy | Mon Sep 24 1990 10:48 | 25 |
|
I think it is great that Kendra has the initiative to speak her
mind especially in this situation. She certainly has a wonderful
attitude and will use it to further herself.
re the advanced history class. All through junior and senior high
school I was in advanced classes. It wasn't until I read this note
that I rememebered that the majority of the folks in the classes were
female. So what? It didn't make a difference then, why should it
make a difference now? I did not automatically assume that girls
were naturally smarter than boys because there were more of them.
When I was in engineering school there were only two females in the
class. Both of us were very good students. Just because we were
the minority, were we supposed to be less smarter than the boys
merely because we were outnumbered?
I think it is great that young girls today like Kendra are speaking
their minds on issues that hit home to them. They are our future!
If they can combat issues like this to make our future better then
more power to them!!
Michele
|
389.28 | Keep up the support... | COOKIE::CHEN | Madeline S. Chen, D&SG Marketing | Thu Sep 27 1990 20:42 | 11 |
| I didn't get to be a women's libber when growing up - only a Tomboy.
But I feel very strongly that the teacher's remarks were out of order,
and out of the '50s in attitude. I also hope that the teacher would
not actually intend to make an offending remark, and that he would
welcome your bringing it to his attention. I can remember similar
comments from professors in college, and from teachers in high school
and grade school, and would have welcomed parental assistance in
dealing with them.
-m
|