T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
379.1 | | HEFTY::CHARBONND | Follow *that*, Killer }:^) | Fri Sep 14 1990 09:48 | 3 |
| >Am I missing something here?
No, the joiners are. Specifically, a sense of self.
|
379.2 | and other desparate social manuevers | JURAN::TEASDALE | | Fri Sep 14 1990 10:11 | 5 |
| Right. I always assumed these people joined in order to have
guaranteed "friends", dates and a (false) sense of security, social
or otherwise.
Nancy
|
379.3 | | BLUMON::GUGEL | Adrenaline: my drug of choice | Fri Sep 14 1990 10:44 | 5 |
|
re .0:
A guess - they just haven't grown up yet?
|
379.4 | | BTOVT::THIGPEN_S | ridin' the Antelope Freeway | Fri Sep 14 1990 10:46 | 21 |
| I suppose no one can know the desperations of another. Maybe the
search for acceptance drives these women. Maybe it's just one of the
sadder aspects of human behavior , and (thankfully) I don't understand
it because it's not one of my problems.
I have others :-] I guess
Is it related to the emulation of style? which includes following the
latest fads, the coolest leaders, the most popular kid. I've seen in
in my daughter (but she's only 8!) and have tried, with some success,
to help her to at least understand what her criteria are. She was
willing to let Amber rule, even when Amber was being mean to her or to
another girl, and so was the whole crowd, because Amber was seen as a
popular leader. But Tracy volunteered the opinion, 2 months after
seeing this Amber for the last time, that it was Amber's looks and
popularity that caused her to go along with Amber, and that Amber was
not really a good friend to anybody. (Was I proud of Tracy!)
So maybe these girls are stuck in childhood? I don't see that the
hazing does anything but reinforce that...
|
379.5 | | WR2FOR::OLSON_DO | | Fri Sep 14 1990 12:10 | 17 |
| We discussed fraternities over in quark::mennotes #439 last spring.
Insofar as people degrade others I agree that the greek systems
at far too many schools are more damaging to individuals, and
oriented more towards enforcing conformity to outdated and
stereotypical social norms. By the way, *that* is how I would
interpret your daughter's confession, that she followed the lead
of a 'popular' but mean person because that person was considered
physically attractive. [illustrates social norm conformity]
But I regard this as a perversion of the ideals of these sororities
and fraternities, and it doesn't have to be that way, and sometimes
isn't. Thus, I can't join in the universal condemnation of such
groups. My experiences are detailed over in mennotes, for people
who'd like more info on them.
DougO
|
379.6 | | BTOVT::THIGPEN_S | ridin' the Antelope Freeway | Fri Sep 14 1990 12:18 | 10 |
| Doug, I'm glad to hear that there are 'greeks' that don't fit my image
of them -- I wish there were more. I'll look in mennotes for the
discussion.
I was proud of Tracy because she figured out for herself what was going
on, and decided for herself that she was uncomfortable with her reasons
for having followed that leader. Tracy brought the subject up long
after the last time she was in the situation. Peer pressure is strong,
and the first step toward resisting it is recognizing it.
|
379.7 | One Greek's experiences | VAXWRK::SKALTSIS | Deb | Fri Sep 14 1990 17:10 | 33 |
| When I was in college, there were about 200 women (100 on campus) and
3000 males. That breaks down to about 25 resident women per class. There
were two sororities, and part of the pressure to join indeed was to have
a group of friends of your own gender to hang out with. I, and about 15
other women started a 3rd sorority because we didn't like what we saw
in the others. I admit that we were a bit of a maverick group to begin
with and made no bones about the fact that we admitted a "token WASP"
to our ranks (guess why we made a point of telling everyone that?), but
we recruited pledges with the slogan "come to visit us, not to do our
chores". We did require that our pledges do a lot of
visiting to get to know the sisters, but but it was really "quality
time", not time to degrade them. We spent a lot of time tutoring or
just listing and counseling the pledges on things on getting over the
loneliness of being away from home/boyfriend, dealing with some blatant
MCP professors or just coping as a member of the female minority in the
school. Now, we did kidnap pledges (always to an ice-cream shop 1 mile
from the school, and the kidnaping sister paid for the pledges' sundae),
and we did make them dress up the bronze school mascot with a knitted
cap and scarf when it snowed, but that is the closest we did to hazing,
and I do think that that made us better friends. Today, that kind of
stuff sounds stupid but back then it was a great way of relieving
pressure.
I guess looking back, I know that *I* joined a sorority because it was
a place that I felt that I really belonged and was accepted in an
overwhelmingly male environment. I guess what I am saying is that the
organization felt like a safe haven. We had a lot of fun togeather,
(in fact, most of us worked in the cafeteria), and I really think that
it enhanced my college experience. Also, I got to know some people
quite well that I probably never would have. I still keep in touch with
some of the sisters.
Deb
|
379.8 | The Black Greek Experience is often very positive. | CAESAR::FOSTER | | Fri Sep 14 1990 18:26 | 21 |
| I did not participate in the Greek experience, but I had many friends
who did. RPI was similar to the school Deb describes, i.e. lots of men,
and few women. We also had two sororities until the women on my floor
started a third. None of the three had much to offer me, especially as
I was black, and needed/wanted the cameraderie of other black women -
we had our own unique college experience that we needed to peer bond
about! :-) BLACK MEN!
A fourth sorority from a local SUNY campus recruited black women from
RPI. Alpha Kappa Alpha Inc. is one of the most prestigious black
sororities, and I wanted to pledge. I didn't have the pre-requisite
2.5/3.0. Unlike "white" sororities (face it, most of them are
predominantly white!), AKA's often stay in touch for their entire
lives. And continue to network, hold social and charity events, and
help each other get jobs, become established in a community, feel
welcome.
Yeah, you pay a small price in terms of some humiliation in the beginning.
But the payoff CAN last your whole life. There is value in having a
network of women to call on any time for the rest of your life. That's
what a black sorority can offer. Its not something to snear at.
|
379.9 | | CSCMA::BALDWIN | | Fri Sep 14 1990 19:06 | 58 |
| If I may, I think I have something that relates to the discussion
at hand:
When I was in college way back in 1981, the movie "Animal House"
was still very much embedded in the minds of college students, and
the toga parties were still very much a ritual in the dorms.
My college was set way up on a hill just over the border in New
Hampshire (Franklin Pierce College), and the population was small.
This isolation got to many people (which probably explains why we
had a tremendous drop-out percentage before the snow fell on the
ground ;-)). I guess you could say that the ratio was about 5
males to every female on campus.
Fraternities and sororities were not allowed for the longest time
for various reasons; but primarily because the college didn't want
what had once been known as responsible groups of students gathering
and cohabitating in peaceful, productive environments (yeah right)
which turned into unpeaceful, unproductive groups of riotous
imbecilic party animals.
This aside, there were several "factions" of students who tried
and tried to gain approval through the campus government to allow
the farts...I mean, the frats to exist on/off the campus. They were
vehemently denied. Sooo, an off-campus house was found and a group
of these students (males and females) set up their own fraternity.
The men were on the third floor of the house, while females were
on the first, and neither the twain should meet? Not so, Watson.
But, these guys weren't the rowdiest of fellows, by any standard.
And neither were the females of this bunch. They were the scholastic
wonders of the campus...priviledges uncompared and grades unsurpassed
by anyone else on campus...*THATS* why they were all having a tough
time existing *on* the campus...because the campus was absolutely
rowdy whenever it possibly could be!
There wasn't a single dorm on this campus where a girl felt "safe".
That's why these folks didn't "fit in", as it were. They would
constantly be harrassed as nerds by the "underachievers" whose only
goal in college was to figure out where the next keg-party was going
to be. I was neither a party animal nor a scholastic genius (as
some of my type-o's in notes will attest), but I saw how these students
were treated and all I could say was "These people are going to
be killed on this campus."
I guess you could call this a reversal of the matter, but I must
admit that there are times when not only are fraternities appropriate
but, as in the above case, it was downright essential. But outside
of this one cited example, I have been and probably always will
be against the type of farts...I mean, frats such as the ones described
by the basenoter. This type of ridiculously appalling behavior has
got to end.
The idea that frats are merely a place to party, get drunk and get laid
( not necessarily in that order ) is idiotic. This does not prepare
anyone for what awaits them in the "real world" as a whole, and even if
it did, it's not a "real world" ideal I'd care to see perpetuated.
|
379.10 | and then there's basic training | TINCUP::KOLBE | The dilettante debutante | Fri Sep 14 1990 20:01 | 13 |
| This hazing and proving seems to be a part of human nature. Certainly
while studying anthropolgy you read through reams of material on
cultures that have initiation rites for those entering adulthood. I
suspect that initially the greek societies were used for initiating the
children of the upper classes into the world they were to inherit.
I once read an interesting article that claimed soroities were created
to make sure the women and men of the elite met the proper marriage
partners.
As for myself, I went to a pledge party my freshman year and walked out
before it was over. It was obvious this was not for hippy chicks and
wasn't worth my time or theirs. liesl
|
379.11 | | SKYLRK::OLSON | Partner in the Almaden Train Wreck! | Fri Sep 14 1990 20:53 | 11 |
| re .10, Liesl-
> I suspect that initially the greek societies were used for initiating
> the children of the upper classes into the world they were to inherit.
This is not at all the way I look at them. My fraternity was founded
in 1839, and the eight men who did so had ideas of noble companionship,
and fidelity to lofty virtuous ideals. They weren't doing anything for
their children nor was it done for them.
DougO
|
379.12 | | WMOIS::B_REINKE | We won't play your silly game | Sun Sep 16 1990 08:53 | 8 |
| DougO�
Is correct according to my memory of the origin of fraternities.
Most of them were founded by religious, idealistic young men who
conceived of the fraternities as a way to study together, improve
their morals and give service to others.
Bonnie
|
379.13 | Values | CASEE::MCDONALD | | Mon Sep 17 1990 04:59 | 13 |
| At first I wanted to join a sorority because I thought it sounded
like a fun way to meet people. However at my University
(Vanderbilt, a private University in the South), there were many
more women going through rush than could be accepted.
We had to fill out forms telling the Occupations of our parents
what sorority , fraternity they belonged to , and other personal
details. I found out that most people were selected based on what
there parents did ($$$), not based on themselves. It was also impossible
to join a sorority without "recs" (recomendations from Alumni of
the Sorority). Minorities also had no chance.
After learning about this system I no longer wanted to belong to
it, but a lot of people at my University place high values on
belonging to the right sorority (like tri-delt).
|
379.14 | do no judge, lest yee be judged | ASDS::BARLOW | Care to tango? | Mon Sep 17 1990 18:58 | 46 |
|
I've only had time to read the first 4 responses, and so far,
you're all WAY off. I attended the U of Pittsburgh, with
30,000 other students. I felt that the best way for me to
meet and get to know women, (since I was a computer science
major), was through a sorority. I joined a sorority my
freshman year that prided itself on the differences of its
members. We had Moslem, Jewish, Catholic and Protestant
women, not to mention the aetheists. We also did not haze.
The only thing you could consider close to hazing was the require-
ments that our pledges had to memorize all of their future sister's
names and they had to interview every sister. The purpose of this
was that they get to know every sorority sister.
I think that sororities exist to give women a sort-of home
away from home. A group of people who would give you unconditional
love no matter what you did. It also taught you to give
love and accept love from many different kinds of women.
Personally, I learned how to get along with anyone; not
to pre-judge people and to support other women. We protected
our younger, more inexperienced sisters if/when they drank too
much. At any frat parties, I always offered the younger sisters
a glass of water instead of alcohol if there was a pledge chug.
I told them to only drink if they wanted to.
These were not acts of a desperate woman trying to "fit in".
These are the acts of teenagers and young adults trying to
learn to strech their boundaries and find themselves.
Fraternities use hazing to bond. Sororities use talking,
friendship and acting silly together to bond. Sometimes
it's really fun to act like a child with a bunch of other
women.
I think that my most fond college memories are of times
with my sororities. I don't think I'll ever have the
privilege of being friends with so many diversified
women again. In a normal life, you just don't have the
time. Sororities are an organized way to provide the time
and environment for HEALTHY, SUPPORTIVE friendships with other
women.
I don't think that I or any of my Delta Zeta sisters deserve
to be criticized for wanting to have a big family.
Rachael
|
379.15 | | FSHQA1::AWASKOM | | Tue Sep 18 1990 16:49 | 20 |
| I've often wished that when I was at Purdue, I had joined a sorority.
I went through rush (and got an invite from Delta Zeta, I think) but my
then boyfriend, later husband, now ex, convinced me not to pledge. The
houses I was interested in didn't *do* hazing. They also weren't into
partying, drinking, or being 'socially correct'. Instead, their pledge
requirements and house interests centered around service to the house
and the campus, getting to know the rest of the sisters and your pledge
class in particular.
While on campus, it would have provided a place where I was important
as an individual rather than as a number, in a way that even the
smaller dorms couldn't do. After leaving school, it would have
provided a link back to the campus (I know the whereabouts of *no one*
from either college I attended except my ex) and a way to meet other
women of similar background as I journeyed around the country.
Oh well - if that was the worst mistake I'd ever made in my life, I'd
be on easy street today. :-)
Alison
|
379.16 | | CSC32::M_VALENZA | Postmodern noter. | Tue Sep 18 1990 17:29 | 4 |
| Alison, I think the real question is whether or not you can be forgiven
for having attended Purdue. :-)
-- Mike (Indiana University, class of 1981)
|
379.17 | | FSHQA1::AWASKOM | | Tue Sep 18 1990 17:34 | 5 |
| Mike -
I'll forgive you if you'll forgive me :-)
Alison
|
379.18 | worst 3 semesters of my life | DECWET::JWHITE | the company of intelligent women | Tue Sep 18 1990 19:12 | 4 |
|
i've never forgiven myself.
(iu school of music, mm 1982)
|
379.19 | Fooey | CSC32::M_VALENZA | Postmodern noter. | Tue Sep 18 1990 19:21 | 4 |
| Well, my 3 and a half years there were the best 3 and a half years of
my life. So there.
-- Mike
|
379.20 | course, it was the South Bend campus | TINCUP::KOLBE | The dilettante debutante | Tue Sep 18 1990 21:51 | 1 |
| OH NO! And I got my associates from I.U. small world guys. :*) liesl
|
379.21 | | BTOVT::THIGPEN_S | ridin' the Antelope Freeway | Wed Sep 19 1990 09:26 | 15 |
| thanks for all your replies to the basenote.
.14 and .15:
Your experiences sound great! They are what I wish all sororities
could be. I take back any slur, intentional or not, that may have come
your way. Your sororities' initiation process sounds much more like
what I described as desirable aims and methods than those I have been
able to observe. I suppose, like news items, the sensational and
extreme instances of hazing are what make conversation.
Thanks for posting your positive experiences here.
Sara
|
379.22 | | HEFTY::CHARBONND | Free Berkshire! | Wed Sep 19 1990 09:50 | 8 |
| I also must apologise if my remarks on 'joiners' inadvertently
insulted those who had good experience with these organizations.
My remarks should properly have been adressed to that small
group who are so desperate to join that they endure what is,
in my mind, demeaning and harmful hazing. (And the few groups
that still indulge in this moronic activity.)
Dana
|
379.23 | | ASDS::BARLOW | Care to tango? | Wed Sep 19 1990 11:01 | 28 |
| Thanks for the apology and I'm glad I could explain
the other side.
I forgot to mention a couple of other things that us
Delta Zeta's did and still do. (Actually every sorority
includin Tri-Deltas did this.) We all had a national philan-
thropy. Ours was the Gaulludet School for the Deaf in DC,
(oops I spelled it wrong I think). We also made contributions
to many other organizations for the deaf. As a college, we
all had Greek Week where the winning sorority and fraternity
were the one's who'd raised the most for the philanthropy of
the school's choice. Then in our sorority, we had chapter
competitions with awards going to the chapter who'd raised the
most money for the deaf. As an alumni member, I collect Campbell's
labels for underpriveleged kids' schools and we sell magazine
subscriptions. For awhile, we sold Tupperware. All these profits
go to the deaf.
Also, DZ's across the country have a policy that any sister from
any chapter is always welcomed at the sorority house. So,
you can travel fairly safely and several women did. You also
never leave a sister or pledge drunk somewhere.
Well, I think that's it. I don't mean to push DZ. I think that
most sororities are similar and any sorority can vary from
chapter to chapter.
Rachael
|
379.24 | | LEZAH::BOBBITT | water, wind, and stone | Wed Sep 19 1990 11:16 | 28 |
|
I always felt that the sororities at my college were kind of snobby
(maybe only to some of the women there, but I never felt welcome as a
friend or a potential sister). So I became a "little sister" at
a fraternity (this was the kind of fraternity that had little sisters
who were FRIENDS of the house, some fraternities call brothers'
girlfriends' "sisters" - but primarily these were independent women who
were considered friends of the house....). Interestingly enough, the
three sororities at my college had actually gotten their start as
groups of "little sisters" of the fraternities (the college went co-ed
in 1968, so this is a fairly recent development).
There are good fraternities/sororoties (as far as respecting personal
rights, hazing, groupthink events of random mindlessness, etc.) and bad
ones. Every fraternity/sorority had its "thing" (basketball, football,
sports, community service, preppies, druggies....etc) - and I'm sure
people pick depending on their own particular interests. Wonderfully
enough, some of the fraternities at the college this year have decided
NOT to rush freshman in the typical "pledge" way - no pledging, no
hazing, makes life much easier and feels more constructive to the
brotherhood and the college....
I'm still a "little sister", and I still sometimes go back to visit for
parties or events or whatever. It's a good feeling to be welcomed
again, and make new friends.
-Jody
|
379.25 | CHI DELTA THETA...ALL THE WAY! | NYEM1::COHEN | In search of something wonderful | Wed Sep 26 1990 09:59 | 16 |
| As some of the responses have stated, mosst sororities and fraternaties
do nto "haze" anymore...of curse, when I was (and still am) a Chi Delt,
there was one frat that always did the stupidest pledge night
antics...the TKE's...but the worst that can be said about them is that
they tried to soap and toilet aper the largest, tallest building in
Cleveland, the TERMINAL TOWER...on stilts....one of the pledges broke
his leg that night, but it was from sheer stupiddity...he slipped on
the soap!
All in all, I think being in a sorority so far away from home was
wonderful for me. I too learned how to deal with all sorts of people,
and can make the best perogies in NY (a polish type of crepe filled
with potatoe or saurkraut)!
JayCee
|