T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
191.1 | UofDE | CADSE::MACKIN | It has our data and won't give it back! | Fri Jun 08 1990 16:11 | 1 |
| Jeans. That's it. Just jeans.
|
191.2 | Michigan Color | POBOX::SCHWARTZINGE | I'd Rather Be Shopping | Fri Jun 08 1990 16:45 | 5 |
| In our school in Michigan, it was green also, I thought it was the same
color all over, I have never heard of yellow!
"j" :-)
|
191.4 | Green on Thursday | SAGE::GODIN | You an' me, we sweat an' strain. | Fri Jun 08 1990 16:58 | 10 |
| In Lamar, Colorado, in the early '60s it was green on Thursdays.
Also had to beware of wearing those circle pins that were so popular.
Male or female -- and yes, males wore them, to make a
statement, not for style -- they signified you were/were not a virgin,
depending on whether you wore them on the right side or left side.
Only problem is, I could never remember which side signified which
condition, so never wore my circle pin!
Karen
|
191.3 | | ROLL::GASSAWAY | Insert clever personal name here | Fri Jun 08 1990 17:26 | 10 |
|
Gee, times must have changed...
When I was in jr. high wearing the wrong colors/clothes made you an
outcast. If you did it enough you got beat up.
Luckily, some people grow up.
Lisa
|
191.5 | | WMOIS::B_REINKE | treasures....most of them dreams | Fri Jun 08 1990 19:41 | 11 |
| This is an interesting idea, to talk about colors or ways of dress
that made people 'out of it' in high school esp back in the 60s.
I recall most of the things that have been mentioned already.
In at least one school I went to there were different colors
for different days..
purple and brown for example, but I don't remember what days,
but I do remember 'green on thursday'.
Bonnie
|
191.6 | Colors | AUNTB::DILLON | | Mon Jun 11 1990 14:21 | 1 |
| Red. On Friday. (Winston-Salem, North Carolina)
|
191.7 | | SCARGO::CONNELL | Trepanation, I need it like a hole in the head | Mon Jun 11 1990 14:35 | 6 |
| Yellow on Thursday at Alvirne High in Hudson. Also the little loops on
the back of button down shirts. If you had one, chances are it would be
ripped of your shirt by the person sitting in back of you. If it was
sewn on well, you might choke before it came loose.
Phil
|
191.8 | | CSC32::DUBOIS | The early bird gets worms | Mon Jun 11 1990 14:42 | 4 |
| Green on Thursdays, or white socks on Thursdays. (Southern California,
mostly Oxnard and Camarillo)
Carol
|
191.9 | | DZIGN::STHILAIRE | another day in paradise | Mon Jun 11 1990 14:45 | 7 |
| It was *either* red OR yellow and definitely on Thursday. (central
Mass. 1960's) But, I can't remember if it was yellow or red! Good
thing it doesn't matter anymore. I think it was red. Obviously,
I never could figure out how to be in.
Lorna
|
191.10 | green/loops | CUPCSG::RUSSELL | | Mon Jun 11 1990 16:34 | 11 |
| Green on Thursday in Clifton High school, NJ 1966-69
RE: .7
No guy was caught dead wearing a shirt with what was called a "fariy
loop." Custom was, the first day the guy wore the shirt to school, his
girlfriend pulled it off. She then wore the loop all day.
Talk about symbolism!!
Margaret
|
191.11 | Green | ASHBY::JENNINGS | | Mon Jun 11 1990 17:40 | 1 |
| ya, i remember...green on thursdays
|
191.12 | I'm lost... | THRILL::ETHOMPSON | Blessed is the child of yesterday | Mon Jun 11 1990 17:49 | 9 |
|
Well, it seems like all of the 12 previous noters understand
why you got picked on! For the sake of the 'youngster' in
the crowd, could someone please explain why? Thanks.
(And as my mother would say, "You're dating yourselves!!!")
;^) et
|
191.13 | | LEZAH::BOBBITT | the universe wraps in upon itself | Mon Jun 11 1990 17:57 | 7 |
| Welll, I guess I was such a social outcast that I didn't even KNOW
what color not to wear.
;)
-Jody
|
191.14 | we did it in the midwest | TINCUP::KOLBE | The dilettante debutante | Mon Jun 11 1990 18:35 | 4 |
| It was green on Thursday in Indiana in the 60s. We also pulled off
"fruit loops" from the backs of shirts.
How do these biazrre traditions start? liesl
|
191.15 | am i a social outcast yet? | MILKWY::JLUDGATE | What's wrong with me? | Mon Jun 11 1990 18:56 | 7 |
| yet another cry of ignorance in the darkness.
i never heard of such a thing as "<color> on thursdays".
about the only thing that mattered to me was occasionally
dressing up (or down) the day of a soccer game.
|
191.16 | Oppression Starting Early | CSC32::DUBOIS | The early bird gets worms | Mon Jun 11 1990 19:43 | 10 |
| The reference to a particular color or mode of dress on a particular
day is from the social custom of children to pick on a person not
conforming by calling them negative slang names associated with
lesbians and gays. This also perpetuates the feeling that being
gay is a horrible thing to be. It is how I grew up (see my previous note)
and how many of the other people here grew up as well. The original base
note indicated this, but it was rephrased, apparently to keep from
offending some of us (and I am truly grateful).
Carol
|
191.17 | | NOATAK::BLAZEK | a new moon, a warm sun | Mon Jun 11 1990 20:32 | 7 |
|
This sort of thing never reached Spokane, Washington, or else I was too
goofy to understand such social pressures. Some things never change, I
guess!
Carla
|
191.18 | I asked | WMOIS::B_REINKE | treasures....most of them dreams | Mon Jun 11 1990 21:33 | 24 |
| Carol
I was the one to ask the basenote writer to remove references
to what was then called 'q**'s' day.
I was uncomfortable with it, and she agreed to a change for
which I thank her..
and yes it was a perjorative to be told one was wearing the
"wrong" color.
But that still doesn't mean we can't explore all the weird things
kids do in high school to each other.
Bonnie
�p.s.s one name that got thrown around a lot when I was in hs
and teaching jr college, was 'retard'....now I quietly say that
I'm the mother of a retarded child, *and* since he as been mainstreamed
my son has gained lots of friends among the high school kids.
several asked him to sign their year books!
|
191.20 | Down with HS oppression and homophobia | TLE::D_CARROLL | The more you know the better it gets | Mon Jun 11 1990 22:28 | 25 |
| This whole topic makes me very uncomfortable. It seems to be making
light and nostalgic of the oppressive hell high schoolers put eachother
through.
I was never in the "in crowd", I was always the one wearing green on
Thursdays, or whatever the "out" thing to do was, and getting picked
on for it. I didn't know till years had passed what the "in joke" that
I was being picked on for was. Not that it mattered, high school
hellions needed no excuse for tormenting their peers.
It also seemed to me (even at the time) to be perpetuating homophobia -
it made being "queer" out to be the worst of all possible sins.
Everytime someone called me "queer" it hurt twice: once, because they
were teasing me yet *again* and showing how much they didn't like me,
and twice, because I was of the suspicion that it might be *true*, and
the mocking laughter went right to my heart.
I am not the slightest bit nostalgic for high school.
D!
PS: It was green on Thursday. Also, starting in 2nd grade, if you were
ticklish on the knees it meant you liked boys (or, rather, the opposite
sex.) When liking boys became a good thing, the meaning reversed. Either
way, I was screwed, since I have always been ticklish on my knees.
|
191.21 | Onward - and upward? | XCUSME::QUAYLE | i.e. Ann | Tue Jun 12 1990 09:45 | 31 |
| I barely remember high school, for which I'm thankful. How many would
go back? Not me!
One of the interesting things about the UDD class I took was the X/Y
division and discussion. If I recall correctly, Xs were arbitrarily
named minority and Ys majority. In any case, I was in the X group,
and we retreated to our area where each of us was asked to share a time
when we were in the minority. Funny, no matter what race, religion,
gender, age, job code, edu level, most of us had no trouble coming up
with *at least* one such instance, usually negative - and the
circumstances were varied.
My example was a conversation in a Digital staff suite during a trade
show, a conversation in which my input seemed welcome and valued until
I responded to the question, "What do you do at Digital?" I replied
that I provided admin sec support to my [then] group, and was then
asked, "How did *you* get to come to this show?" (Sigh.) But I
digress.
When we rejoined the Ys, we found that they had been asked to share
examples of times they had felt themselves part of the majority. I was
dumbfounded to hear almost all of those folks agree they had to return to
adolescence to find a time when they felt like part of the group, the
majority... I really can't relate to that at all. Talk about the time
I felt least like a valid member of a group (this includes my own
family - not that they didn't try! - and, at times, the human race).
I'm glad those years are over.
aq
|
191.22 | memories...(some I'd rather forget!) | DZIGN::STHILAIRE | another day in paradise | Tue Jun 12 1990 10:45 | 33 |
| re .21, Ann, I can definitely relate to your note. I felt more
"out-of-it" during jr. and high school than I ever have any time
before or since. I never once felt part of the majority during
those years. Some of the cruelties I can remember from those days
appall me now. I, also, can't help but wonder what was wrong with
some of the teachers back then when I think of some of the behavior
that went on right under their noses and didn't seem to bother them
in the least!!! Many of the teachers seemed as ignorant as the
kids as far as understanding and compassion go. Nobody seemed to
ask why, they just pointed fingers.
Bonnie's reply brought up the fact that there was such a lack of
understanding back in the 50's and 60's for kids who were different
in *any* way. When I was in grade school in the late 50's there
were two kids in my class who had had polio and walked with crutches.
I can remember all of the rest of us standing in lines waiting
to go in from recess (boys in one line, girls in another-make sure
we realize we're different!), and watching the two with crutches
slowly making their way up to the door, while we waited. I can
remember hearing kids yelling, "Let the cripples go first! We gotta
wait for the cripples!" And, the teachers standing there and ignoring
it, not even questioning it. Nobody ever wanted to play with the
kids who had crutches, or the one black girl in the entire school,
or the fattest kids, or the shyist. (That's what I got picked on
for-being shy-and that's why I know how it feels.) I used to pretend
I was sick whenever we had oral book reports and half the time to
get out of gym class and *nobody* *ever* even asked me *why.* But,
the teachers didn't like me because of it. Yes, our schools were
filled with compassion in the 50's and 60's. Maybe it's actually
better now? I think it is.
Lorna
|
191.23 | Memories....from the corners of my nose.... | ASHBY::GASSAWAY | Insert clever personal name here | Tue Jun 12 1990 11:25 | 50 |
| I always just kept a low profile in school, so I avoided all the
controversy.
In NJ, we didn't have problems with people ganging up on the physically
handicapped, or those of a different race, as I think harder the ones
who were always getting beat on were either in the tough group, or were
trying to be in the tough group but just ending up being totally
obnoxious. Also, we had a kid who was mentally handicapped in some way
but not bad enough to be dysfunctional. His handicap came out in weird
behavioral problems, and as I remember he was picked on unmercifully.
Problem was that no one liked him, not even the teachers, so when there
was a standoff, the teachers would just separate the kid from his
tormenters, tell he tormenters to go away, and then tell this kid to
chill out and go somewhere else. Not alot of mercy. This was in
elementary school in the mid-70's. By high school, I had learned to
hate most of the "popular" people (cheerleaders, football players, etc)
and just avoided them like the plague.
In NH, it was a totally different situation (moved there my sophomore
year, this was early 80's). Whereas in NJ, most people had been middle
class, there was a real difference between those who had money and
those who lived in poverty in NH. That split the school right there,
between the "rednecks" and everyone else. The two groups pretty much
ignored each other. Also there were far less students (about 450 total
for the whole high school), spread far apart, and all of us quite
isolated. As I remember, most cliques disliked the others, but
everyone left each other alone (ie. you could look weird and people
might stare, but you weren't going to get beat up). As much as I hated
NH, and living there, I would have to say that there was room to be
an individual during that period. (Of course you didn't want to do
anything you might be ashamed of later, with only 400 people in the
entire school, gossip spread like wild fire. You knew everyone's
business, who was sleeping with whom, etc.) I was one of the ones
who dressed weird, and listened to weird music (as weird as you could
get in central NH at the time). Most people knew who I was but left
me alone, probably because I had the reputaion as "a smart one". Also,
I didn't get too invloved with any one social group, I had aquaintences
I saw in school, but I did NOTHING after school for 3 years. I didn't
feel like I had a lot in common with anyone. My brother graduated
after me and he said the school was going downhill towards conformity
real fast. Oh well.....
I'm not sure which was better. I liked the atmosphere in NH where
everyone just kind of left you alone, but I'm also one who enjoys being
near large urban areas where there's lots of diversity, where I can
find people who are more like me. I guess I could ponder this forever,
but I'd rather not spend my energy grovelling over the past. (I
already do it too much).
Lisa
|
191.24 | | SANDS::MAXHAM | Snort when you laugh! | Tue Jun 12 1990 11:27 | 26 |
|
.20> This whole topic makes me very uncomfortable. It seems to be making
.20> light and nostalgic of the oppressive hell high schoolers put eachother
.20> through.
Hi D!
I think this topic does a good job of pointing out the absolute
silliness of conformity. It also reminds me how very early the
"rules" started, and how very well they were enforced (I remember
this stuff from my early years of elementary school!).
I don't think it makes "light and nostalgic" of this stuff. Instead, I
think it gives us all an opportunity to laugh at how stupid we
all were for not wearing green on Thursdays just to be different!
It's amazing to me that this kidslore was so prevalent in different
parts of the country! How in the world did it get started? And how far back
does it go? (I remember it from the early 60s.)
What other ridiculous sayings do people remember that promoted
conformity? Can anyone think of cultural taunts in adulthood that
parallel the green on Thursdays phenomena? Let's laugh 'em all outta
the water!
Kathy
|
191.25 | Back to the lite side | HARDY::EVANS | One-wheel drivin' | Tue Jun 12 1990 12:58 | 23 |
| High school wasn't my favorite time of life, either, being another
one of the "out-crowd". [Who, I believe, in later life, become the
most interesting people, and the ones who *really* do things in life.
IMHO, natch.]
Anyhoo, there are still memories that I find some fun in (this being
a "lite" topic).
Like the time my best friend went down into the gym during lunch and
threw all the basketballs (we were playing bball in gym that day) up
into the balcony over the gym. The locked balcony. The one the teachers
didn't have the key to. So when they came back from lunch to teach
class... [well, you can imagine]. Unfortunately, my friend had a rep
as quite a practical joker, so within *seconds* she was pulled out
of her math class and escorted personally to the gym....
The teachers Were Not Amused.
But the kids certainly were!
|
191.26 | Please hold the mushrooms - in the next state! | XCUSME::QUAYLE | i.e. Ann | Tue Jun 12 1990 13:45 | 28 |
| Sorry about .21 - not very light, was it? Let me clarify: I'm not
sorry for anything I said there, just for my belated realization that
it would have been better placed elsewhere. Moderators, I invite you
to do so.
Since I came to this conclusion, I'be been trying to think of something
on the lighter side from that era. Hmmmm. How about: To this day I
don't care for mushrooms. The taste is excellent, but I can't stand
the texture. Why?
In 10th grade Biology class, when the preserved worm was slapped into
my paraffin pan I regarded it with disfavor. I then brandished my
T-pin and thrust it - well, my intent was to fasten the worm to the
paraffin, see? And my previous, admittedly limited experience with
worms (alive or dead, but preservative-free) led me to believe that
they were (ick) soft.
Not this nematode! It was resilient. In fact, you could have used
that worm for a bumper. (This is, I find, also true of most supermarket
tomatoes.) I was totally unprepared for the bounce and still feel my
stomach do a slow roll upon entertaining the memory. Some years
later I encountered mushrooms as edible substances (can't prove it by
me) but upon first bite... I found myself (mentally) standing in Bio,
faced with the worm, I could practically smell the preserving fluid.
They're just not worth it to me. :)
aq
|
191.27 | MEmories, memories... | HARDY::EVANS | One-wheel drivin' | Tue Jun 12 1990 14:36 | 34 |
| RE: .26
Oh gawd, yes. The worms in Biology class. I could not believe how
big they were! Eeesh.
Then there was the French teacher who had you stand up to recite. She
shuffled her 3x5 card deck and pulled out a name. She then hollered it
at the top of her voice (in French, if there was a translation). You
were expected to shoot immediately to your feet and begin reciting the
day's lesson in French (en Fran�ais) [see? - some of it stuck].
As soon as you made a mistake, she hollered "Goose egg! Goose egg!" and
you got a zero and had to sit down.
She wore nylons, saddle shoes, and a smock over her dress. We called
her "Rock Around the Smock".
This class was one of the most terrifying I ever attended, and her
teaching methods were outdated, even then. I learned a lot about how
*not* to teach from this woman. But I also learned that, the more you
expect from students, the better they perform. I couldn't have been
sorrier at the time, but now I'm glad I knew her. What a character!
[And I'm constantly surprised at the amount of French I remember, 27
years later.]
Then there was the teacher who said "actually" about a million times
per class. We decided to count how many times he said it one day, and
never *did* find out, since we all collapsed in giggles after looking
at each other counting every time he said it. Not regular giggles, but
the Don't Laugh in Church kind of giggles that make everything a
million times funnier because you can't laugh out loud. Gawd, we
were exhausted after that class...
|
191.28 | ribbit | DECWET::JWHITE | the company of intelligent women | Tue Jun 12 1990 15:19 | 6 |
|
one of my few lasting accomplishments from the 9th grade was taking
the tongue from the frog we'd just dissected and proceeding to lick
every person i knew (and a few i didn't know) with it in the cafeteria.
my biology teacher reprimanded me, but she was laughing while doing it.
|
191.29 | | DZIGN::STHILAIRE | another day in paradise | Tue Jun 12 1990 17:51 | 9 |
| re .28, you were obviously a nasty child. I'm glad I didn't meet
you til later in life. :-)
I refused to dissect a frog. I think I pretended to be sick. I
must've spent 1/4 of my school life pretending to be sick when I
wasn't!!
Lorna
|
191.30 | plus ca change | DECWET::JWHITE | the company of intelligent women | Tue Jun 12 1990 18:02 | 4 |
|
au contraire
i was quite the nerd and extremely harmless
|
191.31 | | ASHBY::GASSAWAY | Insert clever personal name here | Tue Jun 12 1990 18:07 | 14 |
| We did the frog.
The idea of dissection was supposed to be that you could put the frog
back together when you were done. My main goal was to get to the
intestines so I could stretch it out and see how long it really was.
But I liked chemistry better because at the end of lab you could
mix all the chemicals together and see what happened.
When I got to college chem/orgo/microelectronic labs I couldn't
mess around anymore tho. The equipment was too expensive and difficult
to operate, and the chemicals actually started to be very dangerous.
Lisa
|
191.32 | | CSC32::M_VALENZA | sdrawkcab etoN | Tue Jun 12 1990 22:19 | 36 |
| I had to dissect a worm in high school biology class. Okay, so maybe
worms are not very high on the evolutionary chain, but I sure had a
hell of a time just keeping my breakfast down. Actually, I had fun
most of the time in that class, thanks to the fact that I had a great
teacher. The rest of my high school experience, though, was another
story.
I am curious if anyone else ever had anything similar to a phenomenon
in my home town, which we called the Beep Line. To participate, you
had to get a busy signal on the telephone, which you could easily
obtain on that phone system by simply dialing your own number. Once
you had the busy signal, you could shout out words between the beeps;
others, who were participating at the same time, could hear you and
also shout words that you could hear, although depending on where they
were in the city some were fainter than others. The idea was to meet
other teenagers of the opposite sex.
The standard opening line was,
"Are--there--any--girls (or boys)--on--this--line?"
If someone shouted back "Yes!", then you said,
"What's--your--number?"
A lot of people claimed that they had unlisted numbers, and wouldn't
give theirs out, but it was sometimes possible to actually get a phone
number and call them.
This was apparently a short-lived fad, and I'm not sure if all phone
systems can even support this kind of thing, but it definitely did take
place sometime around 1971. I was, alas, a bit younger (at age eleven)
than most participants, and so didn't participate very much. When I
got older the phenomenon had apparently died out.
-- Mike
|
191.34 | | SCARGO::CONNELL | Trepanation, I need it like a hole in the head | Wed Jun 13 1990 08:27 | 10 |
| Mikes, we had the beep line. It was part of an old AM radio stations
request line. At night there was this 3 hour radio show and request
line. It was so heavily used that the circuits were overloaded and
people could talk to each other over the busy signal. This is how I met
my now ex wife. We just pulled names and numbers out of the air and
called them and talked. She and I arrainged a date and proceded to go
on and get married before it was all over. The silly things kids do,
huh?
Phil
|
191.35 | | JJLIET::JUDY | Dump her over the cliff | Wed Jun 13 1990 11:16 | 13 |
|
re: a few back..
Yeah we did the worm and frog thing in biology.
The really horrible thing was that if you took the
second year of biology at the highest capacity the
dissecting was done on cats. I wasn't that interested
in biology anyway so I didn't take it....but if I had
and they told me I had to dissect a cat, I would have
refused.
|
191.36 | high school biology class | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Wed Jun 13 1990 17:45 | 6 |
| We dissected things like giant locusts (yechh!) and fetal pigs - not
cats, that would have been awful! My lab partner (male) fainted we did
the piglet, as it was. I had trouble with locust; it was pretty gross,
a sort of giant ugly grasshopper.
/Charlotte
|
191.37 | random thoughts | ULTRA::THIGPEN | You can't dance and stay uptight | Thu Jun 14 1990 10:10 | 15 |
| I took Physiology in hs and had to dissect a cat. The hardest part was
the first step, skinning it. After that it got easier. Of course, in
the beginning we all wore these clear plastic gloves, and if I so much
as put the tiniest nick in the glove, I'd get a new one!
Eeeeyyyyeeewww! But by the end of the year, the gloves were gone.
Guess you can get used to anything, and it was interesting.
This is from a woman who loves animals, and would have a menagerie if
her more practical husband didn't object. I still won't put the worm
on the hook when fishing...
Anyhow, we didn't have significant colors/days in hs, just the standard
groups: hippies (me), jocks, sorority brats (they liked to brag about
how well they could make pledgees cry), the tough crew, musicians...
We all had our 'uniforms' to wear.
|
191.38 | sometimes the human race makes me sick | DZIGN::STHILAIRE | another day in paradise | Thu Jun 14 1990 10:46 | 13 |
| re .37, etc, I do not believe in using cats or dogs in science.
I have told my daughter this from the time she was a little kid.
Despite the fact that she is an A student (even in biology) she
has promised me that she would walk out of a class that expected
her to dissect a cat. I value the lives of cats almost as much
as I do those of other humans maybe as much, and would much rather
have to dissect or kill a strange human than a strange cat, although
the thought of either sickens me.
I never said I wasn't eccentric.
Lorna
|
191.39 | | DZIGN::STHILAIRE | another day in paradise | Thu Jun 14 1990 10:49 | 5 |
| re last few, I know this is *supposed* to be a lite topic but anything
that has to do with violence against animals is not lite to me.
Lorna
|
191.40 | | ROLL::GASSAWAY | Insert clever personal name here | Thu Jun 14 1990 10:52 | 4 |
| Although if people didn't dissect cats (or humans for that matter),
we would not have as much medical knowledge as we do today.
Lisa
|
191.41 | | DZIGN::STHILAIRE | another day in paradise | Thu Jun 14 1990 10:59 | 17 |
| re .40, what I object to in the case of the cats and dogs, Lisa,
is that people kill dogs and cats deliberately just in order to
dissect them. It's illegal for people to kill other people just
to dissect them. It's a person's choice whether they decide to
leave their bodies to science after death.
I do not believe that human beings have the right to ruthlessly
exploit all other life forms to serve their own ends, even if it does mean
more scientific knowledge. I realize this is not a popular belief
since most people assume that everything else on this planet was
put here for their use. (not you specifically Lisa, just most people
in general seem to think that)
Lorna
|
191.43 | | WOODS::KINGR | Hospital called, your brain is ready!!!! | Thu Jun 14 1990 11:10 | 5 |
| Shoot the dog!
REK
aka Life-long dog hater
|
191.44 | How about we start a new topic on this? | WMOIS::B_REINKE | treasures....most of them dreams | Thu Jun 14 1990 11:19 | 15 |
| Actually when I was teaching biology and A&P in college I was
informed that the cats that are used for disections are lab
animals bred specifically for that purpose and never were anyone's
pet.
I don't know if this makes it better or worse for Lorna.
It is necessary, however, if you are going to reallly *learn* the
muscles and body structures to do a disection. They can't be
learned just from looking at pictures in books.
I'd sure hate to go to a doctor or a nurse, for example that had
never done a disection.
Bonnie
|
191.45 | | DZIGN::STHILAIRE | another day in paradise | Thu Jun 14 1990 11:33 | 14 |
| re .44, two things, first, please don't start a new topic on my
account, Bonnie, since I don't have time to discuss this in depth,
and, second, it does make it worse that the cats are bred for this
purpose. They're still cats. I guess I just don't understand why
they have to use either cats or dogs, for such a cruel purpose,
after they given human beings such affection and companionship for
so long. Can't they use other, less intelligent, less popular-as-pets,
animals to learn the same things?
Re, Mark, don't tell me I have nothing to object to. I'll object
to whatever the f**k I feel like objecting to, okay?
Lorna
|
191.46 | | SPARKL::BUEHLER | | Thu Jun 14 1990 12:07 | 9 |
| .41
Well Lorna I totally agree with you, and yes, we are in the minority
unfortunately. Another example of "mankind's" (kind?) arrogance--
that the more evolved species feel they are more important and
therefore, can destroy lesser species. Arrgh...don't let me
get on to this subject.
Maia
|
191.47 | | WMOIS::B_REINKE | treasures....most of them dreams | Thu Jun 14 1990 13:00 | 31 |
| Maia
It isn't a case of thinking we are more important than lower species
but that we have to learn from real things not books. If we are
going to have doctors and nurses and health care workers and research
biologist, they have to see and touch and explore and learn to
understand.
Lorna,
You know I'm a pet freak! I've had up to 5 cats at one time and
unending stray dogs and cats. The point of using lab bred animals
is that they are *not* pets, and never were pets. I'd get far
more upset if I thought animals from pounds were going into
research labs and being used for disection. That would be using
unfairly an animal that had given love and affection to people.
For alternates there are white rats, rabbits and fetal pigs. Each
however has problems as a model for teaching human biology. Fetal
pigs have the wrong sort of circulation (fetal not adult) rabbits
have muscle structure that is quite different (while cat's is more
similar) from human, and white rats are too small for a lot of
work such has heart structure (for one).
I understand how this really upsets people, and so generally stay
quiet on the subject.
How about if anyone wants to go on further we start a note on animal
rights or some such?
Bonnie
|
191.48 | | PENUTS::JLAMOTTE | J & J's Memere | Thu Jun 14 1990 13:11 | 6 |
| Just a small nit...this note is talking about high school activities.
There is no real need for dissecting anything in high school, and maybe
even college.
|
191.50 | | RANGER::TARBET | Haud away fae me, Wullie | Thu Jun 14 1990 20:50 | 3 |
| <--(.48)
Spot on, Joyce!!!!
|
191.51 | High School Biology | CSC32::DUBOIS | The early bird gets worms | Fri Jun 15 1990 15:13 | 25 |
| < There is no real need for dissecting anything in high school, and maybe
< even college.
Exactly. There are much better ways that this can be done, too, even in
college.
In my high school, I was a straight A student (only got 1 B in 4 years, and
that was in Typing), and my mother was the Vice Principal. When I took
Biology the teacher said that we each had to catch and kill insects for
an insect collection. I absolutely refused. I said that I would work
with someone else toward a collection, but that having each of us do one
just to learn the types of bugs was a waste of life. One afternoon my mother,
one of the other science teachers (who was also a friend), and the school nurse
all tried to convince me to go against my principles and kill the bugs. My
mother kept pleading with me to do it, saying that if I didn't that I would get
a B in the class (a horrible thing).
Finally the nurse asked about what my actual objections were, and suggested
to me a way that would please everyone. Since I didn't want to kill for "no
reason", then I could donate my collection to the local Jr High school.
I did, and the Jr. High science teacher was *very* pleased.
I still hated killing the bugs.
Carol
|