T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
137.1 | | BSS::BLAZEK | a stone danced on the tide | Fri May 18 1990 14:38 | 15 |
|
Pam,
I make a significant amount of money more than my live-in SO, and the
way we handle it is on a percentage basis based upon how much each of
us makes. If I make 40% more, I pay 40% more. It works out very well
for us.
Good luck!
Carla
P.S. I do hope you celebrated your promotion privately, if he won't
acknowledge it. You deserve the congratulations!
|
137.2 | | ICESK8::KLEINBERGER | ummm....I forget | Fri May 18 1990 14:43 | 11 |
| When I was married, both of our paychecks went into one bank
account, and money was taken out "as needed"... there was no his, mine,
only ours.
My parents have worked this way for 40+ years, and no problems, and if
I ever get married again, it will be that way...
Working that way, you never had the problem that .0 has...
Perhaps trying the "ours" instead of his/mine might solve your
problem...
|
137.3 | V2 | TLE::D_CARROLL | The more you know the better it gets | Fri May 18 1990 14:52 | 10 |
| I don't have anything to add about the ego issue, of you making more than your
husband...
But as far as splitting expenses, and how to handle, I started a note on that
very topic back in V2 last December, and people had some good comments, you
might want to take a look at it.
Jody? :-)
D!
|
137.4 | | EDIT::CRITZ | Who'll win the TdF in 1990? | Fri May 18 1990 14:53 | 15 |
| RE: .0
I'm with Gale. I make more than my wife, mostly because
she works part-time. However, it all goes into one pot,
and there in no hers or mine, just ours.
And, Anita takes care of all the bills. I get gas/lunch
money for the week, and that's it. For instance, when I
bought my new bicycle ($800), I paid for it out of my
VA disability check. I had to save for close to a year
before I could get the bike.
I've never understood the his/mine or hers/mine money.
Scott
|
137.5 | More bills, too! | ELMAGO::PHUNTLEY | | Fri May 18 1990 15:04 | 22 |
| Well, in the beginning of our marriage we combined the money to
make it "ours" and almost got divorced over it so agreed to split
the money again. I know it seems odd that we don't combine the
money (both sets of parents think it's wrong), but for us we had
both been independent for a while before marrying and used to spending
money as we pleased. It was very hard for me to accept my husband
spending money on things I considered "frivolous" and hard for him
to accept my spending sprees. We both came into the marriage with
our own bills, savings, etc. and agreed to carry those independently.
For joint purchases we split the tab. For us it has been much more
peaceful to keep money seperate. I don't think I would feel good
about combining finances now, either. I have made an effort to
carry the larger load when it comes to groceries, and things for
our son, since I do make more(but I also have more bills, too).
Am going out with friends from work tonight to celebrate the promotion
while he goes to softball with his friends, maybe I'll get the strokes
there and be okay without them from my husband.
Thanks for the input!
Pam
|
137.6 | get in synch? | ULTRA::ZURKO | User Portability | Fri May 18 1990 15:08 | 8 |
| > I have made an effort to
> carry the larger load when it comes to groceries, and things for
> our son, since I do make more(but I also have more bills, too).
This rang bells for me (I couldn't stand to merge money with my honey either).
How about sitting down with an explicit and equitable proposal, and showing
your honey, and iterating on it?
Mez
|
137.7 | One view
| STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Fri May 18 1990 15:34 | 10 |
| My gut feel is that there is no need to apportion the financial obligations in
proportion to amount earned *so long* as the common expenses aren't unreasonable
relative to the lesser income. As soon as you start taking *advantage* of the
greater income to raise the common standard of living, it becomes more
reasonable (important) to deal with the difference, since the greater income
can tend to "drag" the lesser income into debt.
Taking advantage of a greater income for non-common expenses seems perfectly
reasonable. We don't pool our finances, my wife makes more, and has a more
expensive car than I do. It's her money, her prerogative.
|
137.8 | What's the REAL issue? | CLOVE::GODIN | You an' me, we sweat an' strain. | Fri May 18 1990 15:41 | 18 |
| My gut tells me that all this talk about splitting or combining the
money pots is just a smoke screen for the real issue -- your husband's
response (or lack of one) toward your promotion and earning power.
This is based on a similar (and bad) experience in my past. We
eventually split over it. His ego just couldn't handle it. I'm not
saying your situation has to end the same way, but all the money
discussions won't address this basic problem, either.
My suggestion is to get some joint counseling to see if you two can't
learn what lies behind his negative feelings towards your good fortune
and try to reach mutually agreeable resolution of _that_ issue. Then
the money situation will probably solve itself.
I mean, wouldn't you feel happy for him if he were the one to come home
with a two-step promotion???
Karen
|
137.9 | | CADSE::KHER | | Fri May 18 1990 15:41 | 9 |
| I don't like the idea of putting all the money in one pot at all. I
enjoy having my own money for my expenses. Maybe I'm paranoid, but
somehow putting all the money in one pot makes me feel insecure.
I have never thought about this before, but I'll probably go with
his/mine/ours scheme where both of us put a certain percentage of our
income in the our pot.
manisha
|
137.10 | | LYRIC::BOBBITT | we washed our hearts with laughter | Fri May 18 1990 15:43 | 23 |
| My folks nearly split up over financial problems, same reasons as you,
so keeping the financial situation split sounds like a good idea.
And, by the way, CONGRATULATIONS. WAY TO GO. WOW. That kind of
promotion is nothing to snicker at - it's quite an accomplishment!
This seems to be a fairly common phenomenon - men in committed
relationships with women are all encouragement and understanding about
career and so forth, until the woman surpasses him in some way. Then
things tend to get uncomfortable sometimes. It is generally an
ego-thing. Perhaps you could explain how much you want his support and
his congratulations - you'd certainly support and congratulate him if
he made the same leap, yes? Maybe he will feel more comfortable about
it over time...
And if it gets really uncomfortable, and you really feel you need to
somehow level off the inequity - you could set up a fund of some sort -
for emergency money or retirement or college for kids or whatever - and
just siphon off the extra money if he feels he really needs things to
be "equal".....
-Jody
|
137.11 | pointer | LYRIC::BOBBITT | we washed our hearts with laughter | Fri May 18 1990 15:44 | 8 |
|
See also:
Womannotes-V2
884 - handling financial inequity with live-in
-Jody
|
137.12 | They say it's the most frequently argued about... | XCUSME::QUAYLE | i.e. Ann | Fri May 18 1990 16:41 | 31 |
| Pam, congratulations! And I wish you and spouse well as you work
through this.
For many years I was an at-home mom, and my husband had direct deposit
to our joint checking account. When I came to Digital I arranged
for direct deposit to our joint checking account. My husband now
works for a company that doesn't give him that option. As far as
I know (since he does most of the family finances) he puts his weekly
check into that same account. We both write checks on it as needed/
wanted as far as it will stretch. Never *quite* far enough, sigh.
I mentioned in my intro here in WN3 that I just got
a promotion from WC2 to WC4. I lost money (rather a lot) in spite
of the fact that my boss put through an exception to give me more
money than planned... I figure that's the way it goes. In two
or three (four if the industry stays down) years I expect to recoup
and from then on, options are far greater than they would have been.
(Why, some may ask, did I lose money in spite of a raise? No more
overtime, which accounted for quite a bundle.)
The loss of money made my husband very unhappy, although he's been
humorous about it - the other day he called me at 5.09pm and said,
"You're not getting paid for this so come on home!" He's still
a non-exempt worker, so when he grouses too much about our loss,
I tell him to get in some OT.
Best wishes for continued success in your profession and your marriage!
aq
|
137.13 | eye opener | ELMAGO::PHUNTLEY | | Fri May 18 1990 16:47 | 23 |
| re .7 --yeah, you're right, there are deeper things going on right
now and this is just one of many issues we're having trouble resolving.
Also, the mention of a savings, education thing reminds me of a
side to the story I had forgotten about. I pay ALL insurance, doctors'
expenses, etc., have set up a universal life policy for my son's
future, and invest in savings bonds with weekly deductions. However,
I did all this before I began making more money. Maybe the previous
situation wasn't as equal as I perceived it to be. I do this because
I want to and because, yes, it makes me feel more secure.
Some of this whole thing has to do with baggage I carry from my
past, and my family history, too. I have always said that I would
not put myself into a position where I was dependent or "stuck"
in an uncomfortable situation because of money problems.
And yes, I would be absolutely *thrilled* if my husband came home
and told me that he had received a promotion.
Thanks, all, for helping me to see some deeper issues that I had
been trying to ignore/avoid.
pam
|
137.14 | seperate ego problem and financial problem | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Fri May 18 1990 16:52 | 26 |
| I agree with the comment about this being an ego issue. Men are
often socialized to have to take care of women, and expect to earn
more. It could be very difficult for him to "be beaten by a girl".
(Please don't beat on me for that last phrase, it really is common
in some groups.)
I thought briefly about whether this would bother me (my fiance
makes significantly more than I do), and it doesn't bother me, but
I'm told that it is often a problem.
There also remains the problem that if you keep seperate money,
but do things together, you can bankrupt him by raising your joint
standard of living, which could leave him with no money for his
hobbies. We considered several possibilities for dealing with
this: Each of us pays the same fraction of our income into joint
expenses; each of us pays the same number of dollars into house
expenses; each of us keeps the same number of dollars for personal
expenses. I'm not sure which we'll do, as they all have problems
(starting with trying to divide joint from personal expenses.) For
now, we're winging it -- I pay the mortgage and utilities, and she
pays most everything else. Neither of us feels that we're being
deprived of our toys, but our cost of living went down when she
moved in (one less rent payment), so the extra money should make
it easier.
--David
|
137.15 | more than the sum of the parts... | CLOSUS::MLEWIS | | Fri May 18 1990 18:00 | 18 |
| First, of course, congradulations...
On the subject in general...
I find the concepts of possession and territory foreign to marraige
and relationships. It can only be a destructive influence.
Dependence is not vulnerability, and earning power is not virility.
But men have been taught that it is.
As usual, I feel men and women are both an exaggeration of their
true roles in this matter. Men should be more comfortable with someone
paying for things. Women should be less comfortable...
He's not as uncomfortable with what you have attained as he is
uncomfortable with what he feels he has lost. Help him take off
his armour... M...
|
137.16 | | FSHQA2::AWASKOM | | Fri May 18 1990 18:13 | 30 |
| I've only read through .8, so I may duplicate. If so, my apologies.
My sister once got a *major* work promotion and huge raise at a
time when her husband had been laid off and was looking for work.
I still marvel, but she told only her sisters and parents, and didn't
tell him, for almost a year. (She pays all the bills and handles
the checking account, so he didn't see the paycheck.) Her reasoning
was that telling him would be a 'down' ego-thing for him, which
would result in making his job search harder and their marriage
more difficult. So she celebrated at work and on the phone, but
not at home.
I did the opposite under *very* similar circumstances, and couldn't
understand why my ex wasn't overjoyed for/with me at the good fortune
this represented for us. I have since come to understand that he
took it as a kick in the teeth that he wasn't needed/important to
the family. His role as breadwinner - the only family role in which
he felt comfortable - was threatened. It turned out to be one (of
many) aspects of the power dynamics of the two of us as a unit.
As my success whittled away his power sources, he became increasingly
desperate to find ways of reaffirming his power in the relationship,
as his route to affirming his value to the relationship. He simply
couldn't figure out what I could perceive as a valuable input from
him that would compensate for not being "the provider".
I don't have magic answers for .0. I wish I did. But these may
be some things to consider as you try to work out the consequences
of the change on the balance scale between you.
Alison
|
137.17 | Tell us the details in Milestones (6.*), would you? | RANGER::TARBET | Haud awa fae me, Wullie | Fri May 18 1990 20:29 | 7 |
| I can't add anything to the advice already given, Pam, but I couldn't
let the opportunity go by: VERY best congratulations! Few people ever
get two-grade bumps, you must be something special.
Way t'go, gyn!
=maggie
|
137.18 | pay youself first | COMET::POSHUSTA | Solar Cat | Sat May 19 1990 00:45 | 27 |
|
Hi Pam.
Congratulations on work well done, you earned it!!
I'm hoping that you have rewarded yourself as this is
the best reward; Always pay yourself first! Since, I
read your previous notes, I know you have been putting
money aside in the form of savings bonds. Why not up
your deduction?
My father told me the value of paying yourself; first
as soon as I was hired ('86)... pay yourself. Then
each time you earn a raise, increase the deduction. It's
a sort of pay for perfomance scale that keeps me hungry
for the next 'tap'. ;>| The extra money is tied up; but
you also benifet 'besause of the small raise'. I'd suggest
that the need to ear-mark the new funds for a greater
benefit of your family is important. As the momentum of
money snowballs into enormous sums then you can take that
'Vacation' you dream about. My parents went to the Baja
this year to 'pet' the whales. Save and prosper!
Kelly
|
137.19 | Money Makes the World go 'round | USCTR2::DONOVAN | cutsie phrase or words of wisdom | Sat May 19 1990 03:00 | 15 |
| Hi Pam,
Ditto what Maggie wrote. Congratulations. Although I got 4 promotions
within a 6 year span, I had to do it the hard way. One at a time. My
husband has not been a pillar of support.
The extra money I make (50% more than him) is going into a savings
account to pay for the house we will buy in Aug or Sept of this year.
The money is in my name alone because I save well. He spends quickly.
He figures plastic debt is just plastic. I figure it's just debt! I'd
love to share equally but there was a time when he made twice what I
made and blew every cent over expenses. My Gramma always said,"It's not
what you make but rather what you save that counts".
KAte
|
137.20 | from the man's side | CSC32::HADDOCK | All Irk and No Pay | Sun May 20 1990 17:54 | 45 |
|
I'm not trying to assign blame or shoot flames at anyone here. I'm
not trying to say that any of this is *right* or *wrong*. Just to
provide a few facts and experiences that hopefully will enable you
to understand and be able to deal with the problem.
How do you handle it? *Very* *carefully*. Whether you understand
it or not, there is over a million years of society and instinct at
work here. Men are trained from day one that probably the *major*
thing that he has going for him to *attract* and *keep* a mate is
his ability to *provide* and *protect* (read "security" a.k.a
financial security). Still, more marriages fall apart over financial
problems than *any* other. Ask a group of women what they find
attractive in a man, and I'll guarantee you that *generous* will
appear on at least half of the lists. How "secure" in your
relationship would you *feel* if you were in an accident and were
disfigured, or had cancer and had to have a part of you body removed?
My wife has told me that she *knows* that I would leave her if she
ever had breast cancer and had to to have a breast removed (Honestly
I hope I never have to find out). Why do *at least some* women worry
so much about loosing their beauty as they grow older? Strangely,
the more he cares about you and your relationship, the more this may
bother him. *His* security lies in his ability to *provide* security
and therefore remain attractive to you. It's not a *logical* thing.
It's a *very* deeply ingrained *emotional* thing. *Any* of us *can*
do some strange and illogical, even sometimes violent things when our
security is threatened. (Perhaps this part belongs in the *violence*
note, but it's a complicated world out there).
Men have "feelings" too. In spite of a lot of lip service to the
contrary, the only "feelings" they are allowed to show is anger,
unless they are "drunk", then a certain amount of emotional display
will be tolerated. Even happiness will only be tolerated to a point.
After that point, they are accused of not being serious about the
situation. During the time in my life that I call the "dark ages", I
found that the one thing that would turn a woman off faster than
picking my nose in public would be to reveal that I had something
*bothering* me. Read *lack of control*, *lack of **power** to affect
the world around you*, *lack of the ability to **provide** security*.
Yes, I did find at least one exception, and I married her, but that's
another story for another time.
[Let he who would change the world first change himself-Socrates],
void fred(){}
|
137.21 | I think I can ... | ASDS::BARLOW | | Tue May 22 1990 09:16 | 31 |
|
In part, I agree with .20 but I think there are exceptions and grades
to the rule. My husband is 24 and I am 22. When we met 2 years ago, I
was making 50% more than he was. Then I got a 12% raise! He was
thrilled for me. I was very concerned that he would feel even more
threatened, but he didn't. The reason for this could be our ages or
our personalities. I was always labeled and 'overachiever' and he an
'underachiever'. About 1 year ago I seriously considered becoming a
contractor and he backed up that idea. He said he'd make the stable
money and I'd make the big money and that was fine. (I didn't do it
because both he and I agreed that we couldn't live on his salary
alone.) He has even joked at times that he'd stay home and raise the
kids while I could work! So, I think that it is entirely possible for
a man to feel secure enough in other things that a large salary
discrepancy doesn't disturb him.
I like the idea of splitting finances. That's what Jon & I do and it's
worked out well. My other best friend and her husband use the 'our'
money idea and shopping with her is awful! She can't even buy a pair
of socks without worrying that he'll be mad! Jon & I set savings goals
for big purchases and split the cost. We pay all of our bills that way
too. Eventually, we'll probably make a 'household expenses' account,
which we'll equally contribute to and pay the bills out of. Actually,
our disposable incomes are similar because I have alot of debt but
after I pay off my debt, I'll put the extra money into the house fund.
Good Luck & CONGRATULATIONS !
Rachael
|
137.22 | Money? | DUGGAN::MAHONEY | | Tue May 22 1990 11:00 | 12 |
| Every marriage is different...and what it works with one doesn't
necesarilly work with another. I believe in sharing everything in life
(thats the way I see marriage) good and bad shared by both and that
includes finances too but if there is a problem about...let the best
"saver" or "financier" manage the bills. We both work, we both spend,
and we both have authonomy to buy what we want. We also have lots of
respect for each other and we wouldn't question one another, my motto
is "If he does it, must have a reason for it" when I spend on something
"I must have a reason for it too". Financial problems will not be a
problem with us... not after 27 years of sharing everythinhg and
putting couple kids thru college and helping them get their finances
established, money is not that important.
|
137.23 | We adjust according to salaries | DECWET::DADDAMIO | Testing proves testing works | Wed May 23 1990 20:55 | 19 |
| First - congratulations on the promotion(s)!
Second - here's another angle on handling money in a marriage:
We started with one checking account, but neither of us could stand the
way the other balanced the checkbook, so we have two joint accounts and
we pay bills separately. However, we decide who pays which bills based
on how much we each earn. I earn more than my husband so I end up
paying more bills out of my salary. When either of us has a change in
salary, we see if we need to adjust our bill paying scheme. Same thing
happens when a loan is paid off. Sometimes we just funnel the new
extra money into savings, but we both decide what to do with the money.
We also both decide on major purchases, and sometimes even on small
ones.
My husband doesn't fit the breadwinner mold - he can't wait till I make
enough to support us both on my salary, so he can quit his job and stay
home with the animals all day!
Jan
|
137.24 | marrage="ONE" | ASABET::B_REILLY | | Sun May 27 1990 12:38 | 21 |
| I can only speak for myself, so here goes....
My wife and I have been married for 2 years (dating for over 4 yrs) I
never really thought about who makes more money. To me money was never
an important issue. My main concerned was always "Am I happy" the
answer always yes.. My wife has just got a promotion, she now makes
even more then me. When she came home with the news (she called me
first) I had a bottle of champagne waiting, a card, and greeted her at
the door with just my "sexy" shorts on...."WE" then went out to dinner
the next two nights. When I picked her up at work (she works for DEC
12yrs) Her boss asked my if I was proud,my responce to him was "I'm
glad to see you realized what I always knew, that she is the best
person you have and it's about time she got promoted"
I belive with some of the other noters about the money issue.
We have direct deposit and do not seperate income at all. The money and
the marrage is "ONE". I think above all you need to trust in each other
to make it work. I do not feel any less a man because she makes more
money then me. I accept things for the way they are now. I married for
love not money. I would not trade for all the money in the world,to
me that's all life is about.
Bob
|
137.25 | currently a serious issue | WMOIS::B_REINKE | treasures....most of them dreams | Mon Jun 04 1990 22:45 | 38 |
|
The following reply is from a member of the file that wishes
to remain anonymous.
Bonnie J
=wn= comod
*************************************************************************
Everyone is discussing what happens when the woman makes
more than the man. I'd like to talk about the opposite. My
husband makes three to five times what I make in a week. He
is self employed and works very hard. I am a 3 yr DECcie,
looking for a new job (isn't everybody??) and not having any
luck. I don't feel that I contribute enough to the household.
I do most/all of the cooking, cleaning, etc, which doesn't
bother me, I just don't think it's a big deal. Some people
firmly believe the man should do half of the housework, I don't
want to discuss that in this note, I am doing what I feel
comfortable with.
The problem - as 8 mo newlyweds, we still have conflicts from
time to time. I expect that. However, when the argument gets
really bad, I always end up hearing the same `speech', which is
`I make all the money, I buy you everything, I bust my a$$ for
you and you're ungrateful'. This makes me feel terrible. I don't
feel I can argue against it, I do NOT make much money. BUT, when
we're not fighting, it's `I love you and I want you to have every-
thing I can give you. I do it all for you'. Then when we fight I
am ungrateful....???? How do I live with that? I never asked him
to buy me anything, but he did because he wanted to (until he's
mad at me).
Well, we've had this same `fight' several times now, but this
weekend was the worst. Now, I'm sure you're all saying that we
have more than money as a problem. I'm aware of that. I need a
little moral support, but I also need to know how to combat his
money argument. Thanks to all.
|
137.26 | | STAR::RDAVIS | Men call me Bacon. | Tue Jun 05 1990 10:21 | 31 |
| It sounds like you need a LOT of moral support, but OK...
He's coming at you from two directions. One is the money. Great; it's
his money; if he doesn't think it's worth sharing, he doesn't have to.
If he does think it's worth sharing, he has no right to complain.
The other direction is the "busting his a$$" part. By throwing this
in, he gets a good dollop of guilt into the argument. But you're
busting your a$$ too, right? The assumption he's making is that
proportion-of-money-earned = proportion-of-work, and that's obviously
not true in the real world.
My guess is that money is important to him and he's willing to do
something he occasionally hates to get more of it. That's his choice,
and (assuming you didn't twist his arm) you don't have to feel guilty
for it.
If you could live with less money, suggest the division-by-salary rule
- it seems to work for some of the noters here. Tell him NOT to "buy
you everything" and stick to that. At least the petty annoyances
involved might wake him up a little. (I might bring up the "all the
housework" business here, but since you're comfortable with it... (: >,)
BTW, in my last relationship, we exchanged "chief breadwinner" roles at
least three times. It never had to do with one of us getting lazy; it
had to do with accident, or which field was paying most, or whatever.
I'd be unemployed, then she'd be unemployed... I've also always done
"common pot", but that's possibly due to not being very interested in
tracking money.
Ray
|
137.27 | share explicitly | ULTRA::ZURKO | Jubilation's daughters | Tue Jun 05 1990 10:36 | 11 |
| I'll throw out my standard suggestion (it works for us!): draw up an agreement.
It doesn't need to be reductionist or informal; it simply needs to articulate
your shared understanding of who contributes what. With Joe and I it's the
chores that get us. So, when we both start emitting "I do all the work around
here" vibes at each other, it's time to take out the chore list and revise it
("I forgot about all the yard work you do!"...). Trade-offs are what's fair.
Joe hates laundry; I don't mind it. We may trade it off for something big
(going by Joe's sense of fair), something small (going by mine), or something
in between. You might want to add in work time, commute time, support energy,
budgeting, salary, whatever.
Mez
|
137.28 | | TOKNOW::METCALFE | Eschew Obfuscatory Monikers | Tue Jun 05 1990 10:47 | 31 |
| First, warm wishes for your new marriage.
Second, "However, when the argument gets really bad, I always end up hearing
the same `speech', which is `I make all the money, I buy you
everything, ..."
How does the argument start? It sounds as if you may begin to argue about
something unrelated to the money issue and it always winds up there. If this
is the case, the subject is being changed because it is something that will
win the argument. If this is the case, you can say "[John], I am not
ungrateful. I appreciate all the work you do for *us*. That's not the
issue I'm talking about though. What do you think about X?"
You can help to keep arguments from flaring into verbal brawls by keeping
your voice down (especially after his first flare up or two).
If the argument *is* about money (the number one cause of arguments in
marriage - especially newlyweds who are learning to live with each other),
I think you need to talk about whose money it is. If pooling the resources
isn't your bag, then you need to sit down and talk about your expectations
with each other about how the money is to be handled.
Unmet expectations (and sometimes unreal expectations) can be an awful drain
on a relationship. You can say, "[John], I thought this about that. What
did you think?" Ask a question. By doing so, you find out what he
expects, then the two of you can hopefully work out a compromise, or agree
to do it one way or another.
Good luck. Don't let anything take precedence over your relationship.
Mark
|
137.29 | | FSHQA2::AWASKOM | | Tue Jun 05 1990 13:43 | 14 |
| You are also probably undervaluing the worth of what you do at home.
Try to work out what the cost would be to do 'outside' all of the
household tasks which you do inside. Don't stint yourself. What
is the average price, in a restaurant, at retail, of the meals you
prepare? (Some days what I fix should come from McDonald's, other
times it could be Friendly's, once in a while it's a gourmet level
meal.) How much does it cost to have shirts cleaned at a laundry?
What is the cost of a financial adviser to pay bills? Hopefully
you get the idea.
This means that the next time you get the "I make all the money"
speech, you have ammunition to point out what you contribute.
Alison
|
137.30 | Best (IMO) advice: see shrink | BEING::DUNNE | | Tue Jun 05 1990 13:55 | 9 |
| I think you're right in believing you have more than a money
problem. For real interpersonal problems, the best route IMO
is to see a shrink. Notes files are okay, but most
interspersonal problems (IMO) are dynamic, so that if you
find an equitable solution for the money issue, the problem
will arise again elsewhere. It seems to me that you are
tolerating unacceptable behavior on the part of your spouse.
Eileen
|
137.31 | $0.02 | CSC32::HADDOCK | All Irk and No Pay | Tue Jun 05 1990 15:04 | 19 |
|
What you may be seeing is what I call "sticker shock" of getting
married. Many men go through this. The old addage "two can
live as cheap as one" is a crock. The cost of supporting a
marriage can really put a crimp in the fun and games. This
can lead to resentment on his part. Yes, maybe he should have
considered this before getting married, but who says that
anyone who gets married is in full control of their faculties
at the time.
He probably DOES work very hard, and is probably tired and
not in the best of moods at the end of the day. His expectations
of your care and attention at the end of that day may be greater
than you can/are-able-to give. It may not be the "feminist" way,
but a *little* "mothering" durin the bad times, and a little letting
him know that you DO appreciate his contributions to the marriage
may help him over the hump untile he adjusts to the situation.
fred();
|
137.32 | | STAR::MACKAY | C'est la vie! | Tue Jun 05 1990 16:20 | 32 |
|
I also agree that there may be some unspoken expectations that
is not being met. Seeing a therapist together will definitely help.
One big problem is that house work is not highly valued.
eg. I would be spending 3 hrs doing house work and my husband
would be building a shelf in the same 3 hrs. It would be so
obvious that he had done something (built a shelf), but nobody would
even notice that the clothes are washed and the counter is clean.
You work hard but it is not highly visible. One thing that helps
is to write down how much time you spend each week doing housework.
Another problem is that a lot of men still expects their wives
to treat them like the "breadwinners". I mean, my mom treated my dad
like king, since he was out there making $ for the family. My dad
didn't have to lift a finger at home. My mother never worked, so she
could afford the time to pamper my father. My mother was happy that
she was well taken care of (moneywise). Times have changed, but
not completely. It will take people a few generations to "adjust"
to the changes.
Your problem is pretty common. It happens at my house, too.
Fortortunately, I am quite a bit younger than my husband.
I know one of these days, I'll make as much if not
more than my husband and he'll have to stick his "speech" somewhere.
But, in the mean time, I try not to let an argument float into
the area of who is contributing more. Marriage is not a "fair" deal.
And sometimes, questioning one's contribution => questioning one's
loyalty and it gets touchy. It takes certain skills to have productive
fights.
Eva.
|
137.33 | $0.02 + $0.02 = $0.04 | CSC32::HADDOCK | All Irk and No Pay | Tue Jun 05 1990 18:55 | 18 |
| I've been doing some more thinking on this. Another possibility
may be that he is unsure about just where he stands in the marriage.
Ie. What your expectations of *him* are. If he is bringing this
up over and over, it is obviously something that is bothering him
a great deal. The reason that every fight comes around to this
subject may be that *this* is really the source of his discomfort
in the first place. Starting arguments about *x* may just be an
excuse to bring this subject up again. He may not understand that
it is ok with you for you to do the housework and may be waiting
for the other shoe to fall and be trying to "stake out" his
position on a problem that is not a problem in the first place.
Set down with him (hopefully with a third party, marriage counselor,
minister, etc ) and lay down some ground rules for finances, house-
work, etc and clear the air. Don't wait until this becomes a
BIG problem before doing something about it.
fred();
|
137.34 | | FRSBEE::MALLETT | Barking Spider Industries | Tue Jun 05 1990 20:06 | 64 |
| re: .25 (Anonymous)
First, I'm not sure quite how to offer moral support other than
to send a virtual hug your way (consider it done). Beyond that,
I'd hazard a guess that if the situations are as you've portrayed
them, there is indeed more than a money problem at work. I have
a feeling that the real issues are more control and power than
money.
�. . .I always end up hearing the same `speech', which is `I make
� all the money, I buy you everything, I bust my a$$ for you and
� you're ungrateful'.
Am I correct in guessing that the follow up remark goes something
like, ". . .because if you were grateful, you'd agree with me
(or do something I want or do something the way I want)"? You
see, if it isn't a question of money (i.e. if you're not arguing
about how to stretch your two combined incomes to meet nearly
insurmountable expenses), then the function of remarks like
he's making is to manipulate your responses in some way. And
it appears he's achieving some degree of success.
� This makes me feel terrible. I don't feel I can argue against it,
To some degree you can't. And sub-consciously or otherwise, I
suspect he may be aware of that. But here's something you might
look at. "I make all the money, buy you everything, and bust my
ass for you" is a valid enough feeling for him to have (not
necessarily what I'd consider to be healthy, but they *are* his
feelings and are thus valid for him). However, to link the accu-
sation, "You're ungrateful" to all of that is off base and manip-
ulative.
What's his basis for this apparently omniscient knowledge of how
you feel? My guess is that when he says this, he's trying to
hit your guilt button (and apparently doing a good job). But
what is it that you're supposed to feel guilty about? That
he's working as much as *he chooses* to? That *he's* decided
that all of his work efforts are for your benefit? Did *you*
ever ask/demand him to work so hard just to give you all kind
of material things? Your reply indicates that you didn't.
I can think of at least one way you might be able to clarify the
issues here and I strongly agree with those who've suggested that
a neutral third party might help greatly in keeping the anger at
a manageable level. You might try asking him why he feels you're
ungrateful. What would demonstrate to him your gratitude? My
guess is that the overall dynamic at work here will be something
like, "Because I've chosen to work very hard and because I've
chosen to bestow the fruits of my labors upon you, you should
think and/or act as I wish." An interesting philosophy, but
not one that leaves much room for your choices.
In that same exchange, I think it may be worth while for you to let
him know exactly how you feel about this argument tactic that he's
using (manipulated, confused, angry, guilty, whatever). Because
it *is* a tatic; it's meant to get you to respond in some way that
he desires, but until you all can get past the emotional charge
that's generated by such a tactic, I don't think you'll be able
to get closer to what the real desires and expectations are.
Good luck and let us know how it goes.
Steve
|
137.35 | a chance to talk about how to fight | COGITO::SULLIVAN | Singing for our lives | Tue Jun 05 1990 20:48 | 15 |
|
Dear Anonymous,
I like the suggestions I've seen so far about looking into counselling
and about your thinking about the value of your contributions to the
household. I'd also like to suggest (on the heels of what Steve said
in .25 about telling your husband how you feel) that you choose a time
when you're not arguing and tell your husband how it makes you feel
when he accuses you of being ungrateful. This might turn out to be
a productive discussion about how you can learn to "fight" better.
Good luck,
Justine
|
137.36 | Gettin' in on this kinda late ... | RAVEN1::JERRYWHITE | Joke 'em if they can't take a ... | Wed Jun 06 1990 10:12 | 6 |
| I gotta put a plug in for the "joint" effort. My wife and I both work
at DEC, I make a tad more than she does. *Our* money goes in *our*
bank, with which I pay *our* bills. Works for us, but I can see how it
wouldn't work for everyone ...
Jerry
|
137.37 | reply | WMOIS::B_REINKE | treasures....most of them dreams | Wed Jun 06 1990 14:31 | 148 |
| The following reply is from the author of note .25
Bonnie J
=wn= comod
*****************************************************************
First, let me than you all warmly for your thoughtful
remarks. Some of you have said things that have been
floating around in my head but I couldn't figure out how
to articulate them. I'd like to respond to some of your
comments...
>>.26 STAR::RDAVIS
>>Great; it's his money; if he doesn't [want to] share...[fine]
>> ...money is important to him and he's willing to do something he
>>occasionally hates to get more of it. That's his choice,
>>.28 TOKNOW::METCALFE
>>I think you need to talk about whose money it is...sit down
>>and talk about your expectations with each other about how
>>the money is to be handled.
BINGO! I have decided that I will chart out our living expenses,
and suggest that, instead of giving me every dime he makes to go
into our joint account, he give me (us) only the amount needed to
fulfill the budget, after that, he can put what's left into an
account of his own. If he wants to take money out to buy himself
something, fine; if he wants to pay off/ahead any of our bills, that
is HIS choice.
>> .28
>>Unmet expectations (and sometimes unreal expectations) can be
>>an awful drain on a relationship.
>>.33 CSC32::HADDOCK
>>I've been doing some more thinking on this. Another possibility
>>may be that he is unsure about just where he stands in the marriage.
>>Ie. What your expectations of *him* are. If he is bringing this
>>up over and over, it is obviously something that is bothering him
>>...*this* is really the source of his discomfort in the first place.
I plan to sit down with him and say something like `we've been
married for 8 months now, and we've been having some conflicts
lately. Let's talk about what we expected before we got married
as opposed to what actually happened, and how we think things
might need to be changed (either actully or just by viewpoint).'
He's TERRIFIED of being WRONG about anything. I wasn't sure about
that at first, but I am now. Sometimes when he blames me for
something, I know he *doesn't mean it* BECAUSE it's easier for
his ego to blame me than to accept it himself. This is something
that I want to discuss with him, also. I think he's also afraid that
because he does something wrong, I will not be happy to be married
to him any longer.
>>.31 CSC32::HADDOCK
>> What you may be seeing is what I call "sticker shock" of getting
>> married. Many men go through this.
Yes, I think this is part of it. He has remarked that he doesn't
have as much money to fool around with as he used to. I do NOT
feel guilty about that _because_ - he CHOSE to buy certain things
for me because he WANTED to. If that means he now has to pay the
bills for it, then that's the way it is. I have told him NOT to
buy me anything more, or to wait until we/I really need the item
before buying it, but he goes and buys it anyways. That is not my
fault, but I do think it's should be another (non-hostile) point
of discussion between us...
>> He probably DOES work very hard, and is probably tired and
>> not in the best of moods at the end of the day. His expectations
>> of your care and attention at the end of that day may be greater
>> than you can/are-able-to give.
>> .32
>> Another problem is that a lot of men still expects their wives
>> to treat them like the "breadwinners". I mean, my mom treated my dad
>> like king, since he was out there making $ for the family. My dad
>> didn't have to lift a finger at home. My mother never worked, so she
>> could afford the time to pamper my father.
I think he feels that he IS the main breadwinner, and I
should praise him for his work[=money] at the end of the
day, because that is the relationship his parents had, she
didn't work and relied on him to provide for her. MY parents
were divorced, it was each for his own, so we have different
ingrained viewpoints on this. So, perhaps I need to be more
supportive of his work, but I think he needs to realize that
he's not the only one making money.
>>.32 STAR::MACKAY
>> One big problem is that house work is not highly valued.
I know I said I don't mind doing it all, and that's true - it's
a very small house, it doesn't take long, and I would rather do
it myself than have to push him to do it and then feel that it's
not clean enough. But, it would be nice if he could just say, `oh,
I noticed you cleaned the house'. He does say sometimes, `will you
sit down? you don't have to do that, *I* don't care if the bathroom
isn't spotless'. Well, I do. I think he says that because *maybe*
he feels guilty about not helping me, so if he says I don't have to
do it, but I do, it becomes my choice to clean and therefore not for
him to worry/feel guilty about. I want him to know that that's not
the issue with me that he thinks it is...
>>.34 FRSBEE::MALLETT
>> "Because I've chosen to work very hard and because I've
>> chosen to bestow the fruits of my labors upon you, you should
>> think and/or act as I wish." An interesting philosophy, but
>> not one that leaves much room for your choices.
As I said before about the money, I will express to him
that my only concern is meeting our budget. Any work he
chooses to do over that is exactly that - his choice. And if
he feels I need/want/expect him to bust his ass, then I
will make sure he realizes that it's not true, maybe that will
take some pressure off of him.
I really want to work all of this out with him. We both have
misconceptions that need to be discussed. I'm really glad you all
have given me the chance to articulate and organize my thoughts.
If you see anything in my rationale that you want to point out,
I'm still very open to your suggestions. I find it somewhat
amusing that I can figure him out so well but that I can't figure
out why *I* get upset or dis-illusioned sometimes. You've helped
me with that, too, but I want to know what *he* thinks...I'll let
you know what happens, thanks for reading `the whole thing!'.
Signed,
Feeling better now, thanks.
|
137.38 | Does gift = affection? | NETMAN::HUTCHINS | I only read minds on February 30 | Thu Jun 07 1990 13:59 | 20 |
| "Anon",
You mentioned that your mother-in-law didn't work outside of the home.
How does your father-in-law express affection towards her? Buying her
things? Taking her out to dinner? Do you think that he trys to convey
his affection through buying her *things*, rather than expressing his
feelings (for whatever reason)?
Perhaps this is what your husband observed while he was growing
up...affection is demonstrated through material things. Ergo, the
harder he works and the more money he makes, the more he is showing you
that he loves you. When you tell him not to buy things for you, he may
be at a loss as to how to express his affection.
As the story goes, "no one tells you what happens after you ride off
into the sunset together".
Good luck,
Judi
|
137.39 | Reply from Anon. | WMOIS::B_REINKE | treasures....most of them dreams | Mon Jun 18 1990 10:06 | 49 |
|
Please post as an anon reply to 137 from the
author of .25 - thanks...
*************************************************************
Well, folks, the update ain't all that great...We
finally talked about ALL of `it', and we came to a
wonderful mutual understanding about affection, material
matters, housework, money, etc...I thought it was
great...He even suggested that we seek professional
assistance to help both of us with the `residue' from
unresolved family/stress issues...
THEN, we went to a family party yesterday. He began drinking
on the way over there, ~2 hrs away. He proceeded to get
very drunk by the end of the day, making somewhat of a
spectacle of himself. His siblings tried to get him to stop
drinking, I tried to stay out of it so I wouldn't antagonize him,
as he was getting `mean'. I walked out of the room out of
frustration. He followed, accused me of embarassing him in
front of his family (he was doing that well enough on his
own!), grabbed my arm *hard*, gave me part of the `speech'
(again!!), and told me that since I couldn't let him do what
he wants to do, I might as well go and get a divorce lawyer.
He drove off after we all tried to take the keys away from him.
When I got home, he had been there, taken all his clothes,
and gone. He left a note that said `maybe it's only me, I
just don't know'. An attempt at an apology? Acknowledging
what his family was saying to him as he left, that no one
was ganging up on him, he was making the problem himself?
He's supposed to be away on business the next three days,
anyways. I can only wait to see if he calls me and/or if
he's coming back. Last time he scared me, this time he hurt
me, next time????? I am sure now that it is a drinking
problem. He gets cruel and violent when he drinks, then
takes it all out on me....I am going to tell him that unless
he gets help, this is it. And I'm going to go to EAP, I
think....
I am trying not to cry, this isn't my fault, except in
maybe that I didn't see it sooner and try to help him...I
still love him, I want him to get help...What if he refuses?
Can I have some more hugs, please??
|
137.40 | take care | ULTRA::ZURKO | Feel your way like the day before | Mon Jun 18 1990 10:17 | 13 |
| re: .39
hugshugshugshugshugs
I don't know much about drinking problems; I know that there has been lots of
good advice from strong members of the file in the past. EAP sounds like just
the place for you to start taking care of yourself.
I recently read "The Dance of Anger", and part of it popped into my mind when I
read your reply. The part where, when one starts to change one's behavior to
what they like better, people in intimate relationships send "change back"
signals; reacting even more strongly. You might find it helpful.
Mez
|
137.41 | | STAR::MACKAY | C'est la vie! | Mon Jun 18 1990 10:33 | 16 |
|
re.39
Lots of hugs.
Definitely go to EAP and to a therapist for your for own sake.
EAP can give you recommendations and John Hancock will pay for it.
(or check your HMO). You have to get some of this out of your system
and start looking out for yourself. A lot of times, a neutral person
like a therapist can show you things from different angles and help
you understand your husband's behavior and your reactions to it.
And it is not your fault, you cannot be responsible for someone
else behavior.
Eva.
|
137.42 | | LEZAH::BOBBITT | the universe wraps in upon itself | Mon Jun 18 1990 11:04 | 10 |
|
( )
\0/
! Big Electronic Hug !
_/ \_
Hang tough - we're behind you......
-Jody
|
137.43 | ditto in spades! | CSSE32::M_DAVIS | Marge Davis Hallyburton | Mon Jun 18 1990 13:06 | 10 |
| re .39:
Yes, hugs, but more importantly a strong suggestion that you treat
yourself to an Al-Anon meeting. Call Alcoholics Anonymous for the
location/time of a meeting in your area. Look after yourself first;
let the pros look after your husband. He may or may not be ready to
accept help, that's up to him.
good luck,
Marge
|
137.45 | anon reply | WMOIS::B_REINKE | treasures....most of them dreams | Mon Jun 18 1990 14:45 | 39 |
|
Here is another reply from the author of .39 and .25
Bonnie J
=wn= comod
********************************************************************
REPLY TO 137.(?)44 - HERB
No, he was not like this when we met. When he infrequently
drank, he would be a `happy drunk'. After a few months, he
would be a slightly cranky drunk, basically falling asleep.
Now, he is a cruel drunk, and unfortunately I'm the nearest
target....(I know, I know, get out of the way then!). In all
seriousness, this is NOT the man I first knew. Even his own
sister said that she had never seen him like that and would
never have expected it. BUT, he was acting just as his father
had in the past...
There's another manifestation that I have not mentioned, I
didn't really make the connection until a few days ago. He
has waking nightmares. He will sit up and talk to me, but not
recall it in the morning. He is intelligible, but does not
really make sense. At first it was `teddy bear-ish'; the most
recent time, it was pretty much rape, I could not wake him up
and he did not remember it the next day (I believe him). This
frightens me (and him) - next time he might not want to make
love, but rather to hurt me in some way.
Yeah, maybe some of you think I am or was naive, maybe I was/am
to some degree, but I honestly don't think I had any indication
of this before marrying him, except the knowledge of his parents'
history (which I know does indicate a lot). He always swore he
didn't want to end up like his father (cruelly mentally abusive),
but he did...
|
137.46 | | SONATA::ERVIN | Roots & Wings... | Mon Jun 18 1990 16:50 | 25 |
| re: .45
Alcoholism is a progressive disease, so it doesn't really matter if he
was nice before and now he's not. The fact is that the disease is
progressing. I would second the suggestion that you get some help for
yourself via Al-Anon and EAP here at DEC.
The one thing I can tell you with grat certainty is that if your
husband does not stop drinking, things will get worse. Alcoholism
never gets 'better' until the drunk stops drinking and the family
members seek treatment for themselves. Alcoholism is a family disease,
so it is important that you also get treatment via Al-Anon and even
some individual therapy if you feel that one-on-one attention would be
useful for you at this point.
Active alcoholism means one thing...it's a downward trip that can lead
to all kinds of personal/financial/legal troubles, insanity, death and
just about anything else tragic that you can think of.
Get help for yourself, first and foremost.
Take care.
Laura
|
137.47 | | HENRYY::HASLAM_BA | Creativity Unlimited | Mon Jun 18 1990 18:38 | 5 |
| Here is another {{{HHHUUUGGGG}}} for you. If you want to talk about
the abuse, send mail. It *will* get worse.
In support,
Barb
|
137.48 | | RANGER::TARBET | Who's that galloping | Mon Jun 18 1990 20:53 | 5 |
| *H*U*G*
...and do get help, it will get worse.
=maggie
|
137.49 | | DPDMAI::DAWSON | THAT MAKES SENSE.....NONSENSE! | Mon Jun 18 1990 23:08 | 7 |
| Re: anon
Try A.C.O.A. It is better suited for the kind of
support you might need. And of course *MANY* hugs and well wishes.
Dave
|
137.50 | | CSSE32::M_DAVIS | Marge Davis Hallyburton | Mon Jun 18 1990 23:52 | 6 |
| Why is that, Dave? She herself is not an "adult child"; her husband
is. Having no direct experience with ACOA, can you help me understand
how they might be better than Al-Anon for the spouse of an alcoholic.
thanks,
Marge
|
137.51 | Reply | WMOIS::B_REINKE | treasures....most of them dreams | Tue Jun 19 1990 10:02 | 39 |
| A reply again from the anon author
NOTE 137, AGIAN....
maybe the last anon reply I'll have to make, now...
******************************************************************
Well, he called last night from his business trip and
asked if I wanted him to come home. I told him only if
he accepts how intolerable his behavior had been and we
talk it all out. He got home, and we sat down and had a
long talk. I told him I HATED the man I saw when he drank,
and that he had no idea how he acted (he didn't, he only
remembered pieces of what happened). I also told him that
he would never again hold over my head the things he has
bought for me in the past, how much money I make, or say that
he wants a divorce, because if he does, drunk or not, I
will first sell everything and then give him the divorce. Boy
did that open his eyes!
The best part is, we have agreed to go to a counselor, who
I think will decide if he needs alcohol treatment. He promised
me that he would never drink again, because he is afraid of
how he acts when he does and I agree. We talked about his
frustrations and anger. I told him I thought it was okay to
be angry with his father for his upbringing, and to stop holding
those feelings in. I couldn't begin to tell you how cruel his
father is to the entire family...
I think we've made a huge breakthrough in this whole problem.
I feel really good that we will be able to resolve all of it
with the help of a professional. All of you have been wonderful,
esp those that sent mail. With your help I have been able to
see into my husband and then show him what I saw, and it worked.
I can't thank you all enough!
|
137.52 | It's not over. | XCUSME::QUAYLE | i.e. Ann | Wed Jun 20 1990 17:16 | 4 |
| Dear Anonymous, that's wonderful! Now, go to Al-Anon.
Love, prayers, hugs,
aq
|
137.53 | Please Beware | USCTR2::DONOVAN | cutsie phrase or words of wisdom | Sun Jul 01 1990 06:39 | 31 |
| My friend is trying to get me to read, "Co-dependant No More". I do not
know the author.
I know you love him. Somehow, I think the road would be easier if you
didn't. Your path would be more clearly defined. Alcoholism is a hard
one to treat. He has to be willing to do it for himself. All the love
he has for you can't compensate for the love he may not have for him-
self. When you love someone and he tells you that he drinks because he
hurts and you're the one causing him pain, PLEASE DON'T BELIEVE IT!
When he intentionally picks a fight so that he can have an excuse to
pick up a drink, PLEASE DON'T THINK IT'S YOUR FAULT!
I echo everyone else's feelings. But...I am afraid for you as I am for
any spouse/lover/parent/child of an alcoholic. They drain the spirit,
test the patience, and push,push,push. I am concerned for your physical
well being. If your husband has has grabbed your arm in a drunken rage
what says he wouldn't strike you? Being beaten by a drunk is very painful.
Somehow thay don't have the restraint of a sober person. The blackouts,
from what I've heard, indicate a progressive stage of alcoholism.
If I were you I would separate from him and see if he sobers up. It's
important to break through the chains of co-dependancy.
I'm sorry I can't rejoice in your reconcilliation right now although I will
pray for both of you.
Kate
|