T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
131.1 | This is all I do | SCARGO::CONNELL | Trepanation, I need it like a hole in the head | Thu May 17 1990 10:21 | 14 |
| I, for one, enjoy the anonymity of the system. I can say what I feel
and don't have to present an image to a group. I have never been in a
group of DECcies other than in my facility. Oh wait. I have gone to
Canobie Lake on the outings for 6 years now. However, I don't socialize
there. I go to take my kids who enjoy amusement parks and mostly just
stay with them. I don't live with them and beyond work, I'm lucky to
attend one social function a year. Usually a funeral.
As for what everyone else looks like, I don't much care. You're all a
fascinating grpup of people and I enjoy the conversation that goes on
in here so very much. This is probably my only outlet socially and that
is why I like it so.
Phil
|
131.2 | | CVG::THOMPSON | My friends call me Alfred | Thu May 17 1990 11:19 | 28 |
| I assume that all women are beautiful and that all men are average
looking. I assume that everyone reading is at least as smart or
smarter then I (unless and until they prove otherwise :-)). Colour
never occurs to me. I don't consciously consider the gender of the
other Noters. If I know it it seldom matters anyway.
I have no idea if I Note the way I look because I really don't
know either how I or my Notes look to other people. More then one
person who has met me told me they expected someone "more intense".
I don't know if that's because I seem less intense in person then
I am or if I seem more intense in Notes then I really am. Others
have told me I was taller or shorter then they expected. Several
people who didn't like me from Notes say they do in person. I'm
at a lose to explain that.
There is not much if anything that I wouldn't say in front of a
whole group of people face to face that I would say in Notes. I
might actually say more in face to face then in Notes though. Notes
includes a written record that conversation doesn't for one thing.
Also in conversation it's easier to tell when someone is not "getting"
what you are saying and then correct it.
Alfred
PS: As too what I really look like, US employees received a picture
of me in the mail the other month. (It was wrapped up inside
DECWORLD magazine. :-) ) I'm listed in COOKIE::WHOAREYOU topic 37
and if you are using DECWINDOWS Notes 37.3 has my picture in it.
|
131.3 | Non-so-anonymously yours | TLE::D_CARROLL | The more you know the better it gets | Thu May 17 1990 11:19 | 24 |
| I guess I don't feel much anonymity here in =wn=. In my mind, when I write,
I am writing to and for the relatively small group of *active* =wn=ers - I
know that there are hundreds of mostly or totally read-onlies who read what
I write, and I have to remember that when I write, but beyond a little bit
a caution, I envision myself involved in personal conversation with maybe
30 or 40 other people. And I have met most of the 30 or 40 people! So I know
what they look like, and they know what I look like.
Also, most of the "regulars" have given quite a bit of personal information
about themselves, so I have built up sort of "models" for most of them, which
includes what they look like. So I feel I am speaking to a number of people
that are real, 3-dimensional (or maybe 2.5) people that I actually envision
while I write, so it doesn't feel very anonymous.
Most people say they are not surprised by the way I look, that it matches the
way I sound. But then, I have also described myself physically in this notes
file, so it isn't surprising they aren't surprised.
I am r-o in some other notes files, and know very few people in them, and
very few know me, and in those I do feel a sense of anonymity. I don't enjoy
it much, I don't have nearly as much fun reading those conferences as the
ones I feel more "personal" about.
D!
|
131.4 | or act it | DECWET::JWHITE | the company of intelligent women | Thu May 17 1990 13:17 | 16 |
|
since meeting folk last fall (thanks nancy!) i no longer feel quite
as fly-on-the-wall anonymous as i used to. mostly that means i've made
dear friends who are more real than electronic ghosts. and i do tend
to feel, like D!, that i'm communicating with the 'known' noters rather
than the anonymous ones.
on the other hand, possibly because i don't know many =wnoters= well,
i still tend to have fanciful images of them. after a long noting
session i feel kind of 'fantasy-drunk', often followed by an equally
intense emotional hangover.
(as for appearance, my impression was that most folk found me to be
'younger' looking than my notes; but then, i don't quite look my age
anyway ;^)
|
131.5 | "Wow, a nose on a stick..." | STAR::RDAVIS | You can lose slower | Thu May 17 1990 14:05 | 30 |
| � What do noters think say to you when they meet you?
Beats me, they always move to the other side of the room. (: >,)
I don't think much about visual anonymity. Most of the stuff I wrote
pre-DEC hit specialized audiences (little-magazine readers, college
audiences, SF fandom) which included some people I already knew and a
large number of people I might meet in the future - much like the
Noting community.
And yeah, in similar discussions, I think I would come across pretty
much the same way in person as in Notes. My conversational style
adapts easily to the listen-mull-monologue cycle we practice here.
It depends somewhat on the conference. The steam-of-unconciousness
loon that I do in RADIO_RADIO (and to a lesser extent in JOYOFLEX) is
close to what I'm like in a good mood among friends.
My staider, more boring, =wn= voice talks about things that are
important to me, but in person the earnestness would either lead to
more awkward silences and clumsy misunderstandings (if I'm
uncomfortable), or to more goofball enthusiasm (if I'm not). This more
formal essay style isn't one I particularly like, and it doesn't
translate well to conversation.
But, with certain spectacular exceptions (the verbose noter who
believes that all male feminists have been neutered, for example), I
think most readers draw fairly accurate conclusions...
Ray
|
131.6 | and my p-name's no hint, either! | COBWEB::SWALKER | lean, green, and at the screen | Thu May 17 1990 14:40 | 18 |
|
Personally, I never give visual anonymity much thought... until
I meet someone who doesn't look like I'd expected them to, or they
mention something about their appearance that doesn't "match". It's
particularly amusing when I'm *way off* (like the one noter I thought
would have a German accent, short curly hair, and a reserved manner...)
I especially like hearing what people expected *me* to look like.
I wrote some stuff in college in a semi-anonymous forum somewhat
similar to notes, and almost nobody I met said I looked like they'd
expected based on what I wrote (and my pen-name, which was a bit, uh,
distinctive). One woman said she'd expected me to be short and
slightly overweight, with very short dark hair and deelyboppers.
So much for the deelyboppers.
Sharon
|
131.7 | | PARITY::DDAVIS | Long-cool woman in a black dress | Thu May 17 1990 15:02 | 10 |
| I don't really care for the anonymity at all. I think SOME people
would NEVER say to your face, some of the things they say in the
"anonymity of their terminals".
And I can't say that I have any preconceived notion as to a person's
looks, I'd much rather read the content of their note and then
preconceive why they wrote what they did! #;-)
-Dotti.
How do you expect me to look?
|
131.8 | I know what you look like! | POBOX::SCHWARTZINGE | I'd Rather Be Shopping | Thu May 17 1990 15:35 | 15 |
| I like being able to get a picture in my mind of how people look.
Because what I really think I am picturing is who they are and what
they are not how they look.
I may be naive, but I think that people write what they feel in these
notes, I don't think they are trying to "pull anyone's leg", so to
speak.
I would love to meet all the =wn='s, but chances are not too many of
you will be out this way to Chicago, so for now, I like picturing
you all for who you are and what you are--not how you look.
Jackie
:-)
|
131.9 | To Dottie | USCTR2::DONOVAN | cutsie phrase or words of wisdom | Thu May 17 1990 23:14 | 8 |
| re: Dottie,
According to your little "what-ever-you-call-it-name" you must be tall,
dark, and very cool (in an unflustered way).
Am I right?
Kate
|
131.11 | It's called Personal Name! | PARITY::DDAVIS | Long-cool woman in a black dress | Fri May 18 1990 12:23 | 7 |
| re: Kate...
Nope, I'm not that tall...5'5", my"personal name" comes from a Roy
Orbison song that I like, but I am cool, though not dark, actually I'm
a blonde!!
-Dotti.
|
131.12 | | RUBY::BOYAJIAN | Secretary of the Stratosphere | Sun May 20 1990 05:28 | 18 |
| Anonymity is a two-way street. It allows some people to blow off
in a way they wouldn't in face-to-face conversation (I can imagine
that some Notes conversations, if done face-to-face, would result
in homicide). On the other hand, the advantage of it is two-fold.
One, you can often get someone's *true* feelings about something
where they may feel more circumspect in person. Two, some people
are introverted in person and extroverted in Notes. The latter
describes me somewhat. I have no qualms whatsoever about pontificating
in Notes, whereas i'm generally pretty quiet in person.
David Bowie has said somewhere that the reason he used the Ziggy
Stardust persona in the early stage of his career was because he
had bad stage fright, and the thought of going out there and performing
in front of thousands terrified him. By making himself up as Ziggy,
it wasn't *him* that was out there, but somebody else. I think that
Notes acts in a similar way for many of us.
--- jerry
|
131.13 | Confession | SANDS::SMITH | Passionate committment/reasoned faith | Mon Jun 04 1990 12:47 | 11 |
| The visual anonymity has revealed a prejudice of mine that I was only
partially aware of:
Visual anonymity hides the *age* of the noter, and I find that the age
frequently makes a *huge* difference, in fact, almost as much
difference as gender! Sometimes, comments that someone makes infuriate
me until I find out the noter is such-and-such an age. Then (here
comes the prejudice) I may discount much of what is said, depending on
the age...
Nancy
|
131.14 | | FSHQA2::AWASKOM | | Mon Jun 04 1990 13:34 | 8 |
| Nancy -
I agree with you, and I find it fascinating as personal history.
When I see my own attitudes of 15 years ago reflected back at me,
and realize that I *have* changed (even though on a daily basis
I'm not aware of being any different), well.......
Aliso
|
131.15 | i'm sorry, what was the question again? | MILKWY::JLUDGATE | What's wrong with me? | Tue Jun 05 1990 03:18 | 13 |
|
sometimes i pigeonhole noters as being a certain age with no
basis in reality outside of what the person wrote. and then
when that individual mentions real age, i slap my head and
say something like "No way dude!"
outside of age, i can't make a picture of a person from notes.
i can start to form an image from the telephone, but notes on
the computer remain electrons dancing on the screen until i
meet flesh and blood, and even then my short term memory is so
poor that a week/month/season later i could not tell you what
so-and-so looks like.
|
131.16 | Invisible Capabilities | CSC32::J_CHRISTIE | Non Sequitur | Fri Jun 22 1990 20:12 | 5 |
| I find that people can't tell over the tube that I spend the
day in an electric wheelchair. With my headset, keyboard and
motorized wheels, I'm well on my way to becoming Robo-DEC!
Richard
|