[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | ARCHIVE-- Topics of Interest to Women, Volume 2 --ARCHIVE |
Notice: | V2 is closed. TURRIS::WOMANNOTES-V5 is open. |
Moderator: | REGENT::BROOMHEAD |
|
Created: | Thu Jan 30 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 30 1995 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 1105 |
Total number of notes: | 36379 |
976.0. "Individual/collective responsibility" by ULTRA::WRAY (John Wray, Secure Systems Development) Mon Feb 05 1990 23:42
I've been reading some notes, here and in other conferences, that set
me thinking (a rare enough occurence of itself). I often read things
along the lines of:
"Blaming <and-therefore-treating> `society' for
<insert-favorite-problem-here> is just a way of abdicating personal
responsibility".
I have seen this sort of thing said in the context of male -> female
violence, rape, violence in general, drug abuse, random breath-tests
for drivers, gun-control, anti-discrimination legislation, and many
others.
The general argument is that treating society affects every individual,
irrespective of whether or not they have demonstrated a need for
"treatment", and is therefore undesirable.
So when does a problem become something that must be addressed at a
societal level? When does `society' have to be changed (either by
legislation or by education - and what are the relative benefits of
these options?) in order to eliminate a problem, or can
treating/punishing only individuals who have demonstrated clear guilt
always solve every problem? Is "blaming society" for a problem
abdicating individual responsibility, or is is accepting collective
responsibility?
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines
|
---|