T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
965.1 | | HANDY::MALLETT | Barking Spider Industries | Fri Jan 26 1990 18:05 | 31 |
| � Should I say something to him to let him know I know what
� happened? Ordinarly I wouldn't have any idea. I only heard about
� it because the other woman is a friend of mine.
I believe you're obliged at this point to keep the information
to yourself. This sort of situation is supposed to be handled
(in terms of policy) in confidence.
� Should I tell my boss I won't work with this guy?
Since I'm not given to saying what people "should" or "shouldn't"
do, I'll only strongly suggest that you don't follow this route.
In terms of policy, you have no "valid" reason not to work with
him. Like it or not, suspicion that a person will act in a
harrassing manner is not an acceptable reason not to work with
him (or her). I'd also suggest not trying to make an excuse;
in general, I feel that the more straightforward you can be in
dealing with your supervisor/manager, the better off you are.
So what can you do? Well, I have a feeling you'll be watching
this guy like a hawk, so I'll skip that suggestion. One possible
thing you might do is contact EAP for a quick meeting (or, if you
have one, a very trusted friend in Personnel). I'd ask to speak
in confidence and explain your misgivings. Your feelings *are*
valid and you have a right to let your concerns be known in confidence.
Should the man choose to act in a harrassing manner again, you'll
have laid the groundwork for pursuing further action.
Good luck.
Steve
|
965.3 | | RDVAX::COLLIER | Bruce Collier | Fri Jan 26 1990 21:12 | 11 |
| (I'm uncomfortable that only men have replied to this point)
It sounds as if you shouldn't be sure you really understand all sides
of the story, though I'm not certain. My suggestion (from what little I
know) is that you NOT try to block working with this man, but that you
make sure to discuss your concerns ahead of time with at least three
separate people (hopefully this can include your current boss). If your
really worried, put it in writing to at least two people. My numbers,
above, are just made up approximations, but probably reasonable.
- Bruce
|
965.4 | | SCARY::M_DAVIS | Marge Davis Hallyburton | Fri Jan 26 1990 21:20 | 6 |
| I'd concentrate on the job and keep your thoughts to yourself. If
anything occurs that is out of line, immediately make it clear that you
do not desire his attentions, and then keep a journal.
my .02,
Marge
|
965.5 | you can pick your friends... | ULTRA::ZURKO | We're more paranoid than you are. | Sun Jan 28 1990 10:50 | 8 |
| One of the many tough lessons about work is that sometimes one has to work with
folks one would rather not. It looks like a learning opportunity to me! :-)
Also, I couldn't really tell from .0 what you were worried about. Future
advances, working with people you don't approve of, working with people who had
screwed up in the past and hadn't learned from it? It might help you to clarify
some of that.
Mez
|
965.6 | reply | WMOIS::B_REINKE | if you are a dreamer, come in.. | Mon Jan 29 1990 09:07 | 14 |
|
Reply from the base note author.
Bonnie J
=wn= comod
==============================================================
Based on what happened to my friend, I am physically afraid to meet
alone in a conference room with this man.
It was her word against his, but she believes that if they hadn't
been interrupted by a janitor, she would have been the victim of
more than an unwelcome embrace and kiss.
|
965.7 | | HANDY::MALLETT | Barking Spider Industries | Mon Jan 29 1990 10:47 | 12 |
| re: .6
� Based on what happened to my friend, I am physically afraid to meet
� alone in a conference room with this man.
It sounds as if it would be wise, then, to exercise caution in
meeting with him. When possible, meet with him in a group of
people. If it becomes necessary to meet with him one-on-one I'd
suggest picking a "safe" place (i.e. a place that is highly visible
and frequently populated such as a cafeteria or an open office).
Steve
|
965.8 | are there any women who've had this experience? | WMOIS::B_REINKE | if you are a dreamer, come in.. | Mon Jan 29 1990 11:32 | 14 |
| Reply from the basenote writer
***************************************************************
Aren't there any WOMEN reading this file today? Hasn't anyone had to
deal with working with a man who's known to have sexually harrassed
someone else?
The men answering me seem to have taken the approach that "These things
happen and you just have to live with them." Gee, isn't that nice.
Maybe since I'm not as pretty as my friend, I won't be asking for
unwelcome advances, either.
|
965.9 | I don't think it happens that often here... | ULTRA::ZURKO | We're more paranoid than you are. | Mon Jan 29 1990 11:39 | 7 |
| Yes, I'm a woman reading this file. No, I've never been in your position.
I must admit if I was, if I was really worried about sexual violence, and it
wasn't at all important to put myself in this position for my career or
self-esteem, I wouldn't.
Mez
|
965.10 | | PERN::SAISI | | Mon Jan 29 1990 11:47 | 20 |
| Well, I will venture a response. I have seen in Digital people
get out of working with eachother due to "personality conflicts".
I don't know if assignments were turned down after given, or if
people just knew better than to assign the individuals to the same
project. Of course if you do this too often, you could get the
reputation of being difficult to work with.
Is it true that the information about the harrasment case is considered
confidential? If so, might not your friend get in trouble if you let
on that you know the details? If not, I would perhaps tell the guy
that you know about the charge, feel some discomfort working with him
as a result of it, but that you intend to judge him on how he acts
toward you. That would clear the air, as well as let him know you
expect (not) to be treated.
I think you have the right to meet only where you feel comfortable,
(if in a conference room, keeping the door open). When I have worked
with people that I have felt were being inappropriate, I met their
remarks head-on with "That is an inappropriate/offensive remark",
spoken _loudly_. Also, Marge's suggestion to document was a good
one.
Linda
|
965.11 | | PERN::SAISI | | Mon Jan 29 1990 11:50 | 5 |
| If you are physically afraid of this guy, I think that it would
be a good idea to talk to your boss about it, assuming that s/he
is supportive. I also don't think it would be a good idea to make
up an excuse, because it may reflect on you rather than on him.
Linda
|
965.12 | | SCHOOL::KIRK | Matt Kirk -- 297-6370 | Mon Jan 29 1990 12:01 | 6 |
| In the cafeteria in MRO1 is fine - it's well populated. But a lot of the smaller
buildings have cafeterias that are out of the way and unpopulated except during lunch.
Same applies to many conference rooms, so those really aren't good choices. Meeting
in an open office doesn't always wash well either, esp. for those around you.
I'd avoid the job entirely, though I'm not sure how to do that.
|
965.13 | | LEAF::C_MILLER | | Mon Jan 29 1990 12:10 | 24 |
| I was in a very similar situation...this person kept pestering me
to go "out for a drink" with him after work for several weeks.
I was too naive (and young) to tell him off once and for all. Next
thing I know, personnel and supervisors were called in. This person
had a history of making advances to single women (he is VERY
married).
My suggestion is to first, relax. He hasn't hit on you yet. By
being so worried I'm sure you are giving out signals already (not
being overly friendly, not making small talk, not responding to
anything he says with a smile or eye contact). There isn't much you
can do unless he propositions you or makes body contact. If he
does, quickly say, "that is completely out of line, please do NOT
do that again" in a firm, and professional tone. Do NOT overreact!
You may need this guy for information down the line and you don't
want to burn any bridges. Listen to your friend, but remember, there
are two sides to every story. I was told later on that I was
supposedly "enticing" this person by my easy going manner and dress.
I had no idea I was doing anything wrong.
Feel free to contact me directly if you think there will be trouble
down the line.
C
|
965.14 | A woman's opinion... | MEMIT::MAHONEY | ANA MAHONEY DTN 223-4189 | Mon Jan 29 1990 12:12 | 24 |
| reply to .8...
this is a reply from a woman who has over 15 years of experience
dealing with men in the workplace, and up to this moment...I have not
had a problem with any of my co-workers. Sure, there are always people
who will make a pass at you, but...I deal very tactfully but very
firmly with that kind of people and believe me...they get the message!
May be I have been extremelly lucky, but I don't think so, I do deal
with all kinds/types of men usually found in office work invironment
and they have always behaved very nice, very gentleman-like with me.
A woman has a "six sense" to spot a trouble situation and the message
is...end it asap! Be clear to say you want nothing of the kind and that
the connection is strictly professional and work-related and that
your private life belongs to you and you alone and wants to keep it
that way. In your situation, I would not refuse to work with a person
because that would damage my own performance and we get paid to do
that, work, I also hate to judge others by rumors, but if the person is
guilty, I would make sure that my supervisor knew of said rumor and I
would be very clear in not getting involved in any anything that could
lead to any sort of "danger". Remember, he has been "caught", has been
problably reprimanded or advised to cool it, so, that weights against
him in case of future happenings. Behave strictly
professional/business like and I don't see much of a recurring
problem... Best of luck.
Ana
|
965.15 | Angry thoughts... | DEMING::FOSTER | | Mon Jan 29 1990 12:15 | 14 |
|
I have been in a situation which has some similarities to that of your
friend. Without going into details, I was re-assigned.
I have thought about what I would do. And I don't feel comfortable
stating how I would handle the situation, except to say that I would do
everything to protect myself, my professional reputation, and my
career, and I really wouldn't concern myself with how it affected him;
that's his problem.
Do whatever it takes to manage yourself and your career. If all he got
from Digital was a slap on the wrist for physically assaulting a
co-worker, then I personally don't care if additional repercussions
come into play. In my mind, he's got 'em coming.
|
965.16 | advice from a woman along with flame.. | THRILL::ETHOMPSON | Blessed is the child of yesterday | Mon Jan 29 1990 13:20 | 42 |
|
WOW!!!! How do I reply to this and keep the roaring fire, not
flames, to a minimum? Here goes:
I tend to agree with the above notes. You don't want to end up
hurting your career for something that may not happen. Maybe
he has learned his lesson. BUT, make it very clear to your
supervisor and someone in personnel that you have some very
valid concerns about working with this person. Events that
seems the slightest bit questionable should be documented by
you.
NOW, on to what really flamed me, and this is very relevant to
your current situation also:
.13> I was in a very similar situation...this person kept pestering me
.13> to go "out for a drink" with him after work for several weeks.
Maybe you didn't make it explicitly clear that you had no intentions
of going out with this man, but when one repeatedly denies an invita-
tion, don't (wo)men get the hint. Also, doesn't "No" mean NO anymore?
.13> are two sides to every story. I was told later on that I was
.13> supposedly "enticing" this person by my easy going manner and dress.
.13> I had no idea I was doing anything wrong.
YOU DID NOTHING WRONG BY DRESSING AND ACTING LIKE YOURSELF!!!!
If the person who told you this works for personnel, they need a
serious realignment on women's rights and valuing differences.
I wear what I want and try to be myself at all times. Easy-going
manner and dress are left to interpretation, but if my co-workers
read more into it than is there, that's their problem, not mine.
Doesn't this perpetuate the misconception that women say no, but
mean yes? That they are playing hard to get? That "she wanted
it"!
Attitudes like this are what keep rape, sexual assault and
sexual harrassment at the outrageous rate of occurance that they
are at today.
Flame off. Reply at will!
|
965.17 | Protect yourself: he may try again | FOOZLE::WHITE | | Mon Jan 29 1990 13:22 | 59 |
| In my experience at Digital: He will try it again. If not
with you, then with another female co-worker. The
"slap-on-the wrist" reprimand does not usually stop a man
who tries to force sex on unwilling female co-workers.
I was in the situation where a man who had assaulted me in
a work environment was applying for a job at Digital (I had
worked with him as Digital's representative). I went to a male
manager who is a close friend and asked him whether I should
conceal the problem or talk to the hiring manager. If the jerk
was hired, he would have been in a group that I was working with.
My male manager friend advised me to inform the hiring manager,
because the hiring manager would want to be aware of the possibility
of repeat behavior, and could be very explicit about Digital
corporate policy, without actually accusing the man of anything.
In fact, the jerk was not hired for other reasons, but the hiring
manager thanked me for sharing my experience. He had already
decided not to hire the jerk, but if he had been planning to
make an offer, he said he would have wanted to know the information.
No one suggested that I had been "inviting attentions". I was
attacked at 1:45 pm in an office building. The jerk had consumed
several drinks at lunch. I escaped with mussed hair, one lost
button, and bad dreams. I found out by discreet inquiries that he
had a bad reputation with women - so bad that his male co-workers
were aware of it.
If I now had to work with someone, whom I knew had committed
sexual harrassment of the kind you describe, I would let him know
that I had heard of problems, and that I am not interested in an
affair. I would leave my source of information vague to prevent
repercussions on your friend. I would also keep a journal of every
interaction, and avoid being alone with him at any time. Literally.
If everyone else walked out of the conference room to take a break
except the two of us, I would leave. If everyone else got off an
elevator we were sharing, I would get off with them.
Whether I would tell my boss would depend upon my relationship
with her/him, and whether I thought I would have his/her full
support. If my boss thought that incidents are partially provoked
by the woman ("unconsciously"!!), then I would find a confidant in
Personnel or EAP. I would be sure that someone knew I was going into
an assignment where I felt endangered.
I have seen men change their harassing behavior, but usually not
until a major sanction. Like when the harasser is forced to
transfer, rather than letting the victim find another job.
I am referring to men who commit serious harassment and physical
assault, not to those who just use inappropriate language. A
formal reprimand can work very well to educate a man who is flirting
or demeaning female co-workers.
I would be happy to talk with you or reply by mail. This was not
my only experience of serious sexual harassment.
Pat
|
965.18 | WAIT JUST A DOGGONE MINUTE!! | CADSYS::PSMITH | foop-shootin', flip city! | Mon Jan 29 1990 22:04 | 18 |
| Something has been nagging at me about this note, and I finally put my
finger on it.
Why *is* he still with the company?
I was under the impression that just about the only thing you can be
fired for directly at Digital is sexual harassment. And it doesn't
seem like the guy in .0 falls into a gray area, since he assaulted her
physically, there was a witness, and she registered a complaint. Why
just a reprimand?
Nobody should be put into the position of deciding how best to "walk
into" a potentially dangerous situation, particularly if it affects
your career options!
Conjectures, anyone?? (The basenoter may not want to answer if the
answer makes the guy too identifiable.)
Pam
|
965.19 | Did she actually say that? I might have missed it | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Mon Jan 29 1990 23:29 | 20 |
| re .18
Clearly none of us know the whole story, so any answers you get will be
conjecture - and I won't even try that, beyond pointing out that "can
be fired" and "must be fired" are by no means the same thing.
Also - I didn't see the basenoter *anyplace* specify that a physical
assault took place, with or without a witness. I assume you're
referring to reply 6, in which she said a janitor's appearance
interrupted what she feared might be an assault. My impression from the
base note was that the complaint stemmed from job-related retribution
for spurned advances - sleazy, to say the least, but not specifically
"physical". Perhaps the basenoter can clarify, so that at least the
conjecture that will follow will be based on a clearer understanding of
what did and didn't take place.
Insert usual disclaimer here: a request for facts is in no way to be
viewed as offering the slightest excuse for the harrassment, or for the
response to the complaint, or for anything else. This is simply a
request to focus carefully when reading between the lines.
|
965.20 | | ASABET::STRIFE | | Tue Jan 30 1990 08:39 | 24 |
| I think that the noter who replied that she has never had a problem
with a male co-worker harrassing her HAS been lucky. I've had it
happen to me -- my daughter had it happen to her at the age of 17 and a
number of my friends have had it happen here at Digital. Face it,
there are men who don't understand the word NO. And quite
frankly, I've seen very few instances where the system has handled
instances of harrassment properly.
A friend of mine was in a similar situation to the basenoter. Had to
work with a guy who had one formal complaint against him and numerous
other women who hadn't filed formal complaints had grounds for them.
She said that the first time he came on to her she couldn't believe
it was happening. It was clear that he didn't get the message the
first time (he also received a reprimand) and probably never would.
She didn't feel like putting herself at risk to nail the guy so she
made sure that she didn't meet with me alone unless it was in an area
where there were people in the immediate vicinity.
If I were the basenoter, I'd do the same. And under no circumstances
would I agree to work after hours, travel to meetings or in anyway
put myself in the position of being alone with the man. And if that
was questioned, I'd explain my reasons to my manager.
|
965.21 | Did I read the right note? | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Tue Jan 30 1990 12:08 | 8 |
| Paul,
Since she mentioned that she escaped with *only* mussed hair, and
a missing button, it is clear that some physical contact was made.
This may constitute "battery" without the "assault", but that's
a legal distinction only.
Ann B.
|
965.22 | Mixed up references | TLE::D_CARROLL | My place is of the sun | Tue Jan 30 1990 12:58 | 14 |
| Ann,
-< Did I read the right note? >-
No, you didn't. It was Pat White who commented that she had an experience
where she escaped with "mussed hair, a missing button and bad dreams."
The only comment the basenoter made about the situation was that if it
weren't for the interrupting janitor, the friend *probably* would have been
"the victim of more than an unwanted embrace and kiss." It's not clear to
me whether that means that she *got* an unwanted embrace and kiss, and the
janitor kept it from going further, or whether the "more than an embrace
and kiss" was a colloquial way of saying "physical assault" and that nothing
of the sort actually happened (thanks to the janitor.)
D!
|
965.23 | | WORDY::C_MILLER | | Wed Jan 31 1990 12:12 | 8 |
| re: .16:
Believe it or not, it was a WOMAN (not in personnel) who implied that
*I* was the one who initated this attention. A footnote to this
story; the man in question has subsequently found himself someone who
shares his desires, AND no-one has put a real stop to the situation!
I just watch them and laugh, laugh, laugh! (especially at the woman
who originally pointed the finger at me!)
|
965.24 | | MOSAIC::TARBET | | Wed Jan 31 1990 12:15 | 2 |
| um, it was the same woman that both criticised you and is now in bed
with him??
|
965.25 | anonymous posting | LEZAH::BOBBITT | invictus maneo | Wed Jan 31 1990 16:30 | 76 |
|
This is being posted for a member of the community who wishes to remain
anonymous....
-Jody
----------------------
I was involved in a similar situation. Someone was about to join the
project I was working on. I "accidently" found out that a coworker was
involved in a court situation with this person. This person allegedly
assaulted my coworker, causing physical injury.
I found out about this when, after having not seen this coworker for a
while, we were catching up on what each other was doing. I mentioned
that someone was joining my project and my coworker asked who it was.
When told who the new person was, the coworker told me that they were
in court because of an assault, that I should be very careful around
this person, that I was not to tell anyone that I knew about the
assault charges. The coworker told me to be careful because this person
appeared to be unstable. The coworker also went to management and
personnel to voice concerns and to let them know that I was told about
the situation because there was concern for my safety.
My manager met with personnel, then met with me. They explained that I
could not say anything to anyone about the people involved (because of
legal reasons - particularly the possiblity of slander lawsuits). And
that nothing had been proven in court. Until there was proof in court,
DEC couldn't do anything. (Apparently, the incident was not witnessed.)
I made sure that they understood that I found out about the incident
innocently, that we were not sitting gossiping about people. And that
it was something that I wished I didn't know.
Basically, I was told to keep my mouth shut and my eyes open and to
immediately report any situations in which I felt uncomfortable. At
first, it was difficult to manage working with this person after having
been told of this incident. I didn't want to judge someone based on
someone else's experiences, but I didn't want to endanger myself. I
hated knowing this information.
I acted like I do whenever I have a coworker that I don't want to
encourage (for whatever reason). I was direct and to the point with
this person. I did not discuss anything other than work with this
person. This person frequently acted inappropriately, but not
harrassing (in my opinion). When this happened, I made it clear that I
thought this person was acting inappropriately. Things never got out of
hand. I was always very careful and never real comfortable around this
person, but I wasn't fearful because of the rules I played by.
I did not tell this person what I knew. We worked together for 6+
months without incident. The project is over and we no longer work
together. During that time I made sure I was never alone with this
person. I made sure that my manager and personnel understood how I felt
about working with this person given what I had been told. I knew I had
to work with this person. I managed it by not being alone with this
person, being business-like, and very aloof. I was cold, but not nasty.
I trusted my instincts to not get involved in the situation.
Be careful and protect yourself, but try not to be judgemental. It will
only look bad for you. For whatever reason, DEC made a decision to
allow him to continue to work here. If you refuse to work with him,
you'll look bad. I'd let personnel and your manager know that you know
about the incident and that it makes you uncomfortable. I would talk to
EAP to get some help to work out the way you feel about the situation
and how you can make it work. They can give you strategies for working
together, like meeting in open places. Involving personnel will lay the
groundwork if there is any trouble. If I were you, I'd be willing to
work with this man, under the conditions that it is not required that I
ever be alone with him. My impression from my management and personnel
is that if you refuse to work with him, you may find yourself in
trouble for being uncooperative.
I don't envy you at all. I know that it is very difficult to deal with.
It drove me crazy at first. Lay the ground rules out. Do what you can
to discourage any familiarity. Be sure to let people know if you feel
threatened.
|
965.26 | | ALIEN::POSTPISCHIL | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Thu Feb 01 1990 08:30 | 21 |
| Re .25:
> They [personnel] explained that I could not say anything to anyone
> about the people involved (because of legal reasons - particularly the
> possiblity of slander lawsuits).
I'd like to point out that Digital isn't in charge of the whole world
-- court records are public, and if somebody got a copy of public
records, made photocopies, and sent those copies by United States mail
(perhaps anonymously) to people who might be interested in them,
Digital would not have jurisdiction.
Another idea that might come in useful in some situations:
Voice-activated tape recorders can be obtained for $45 or less.
Letting a person know you will be carrying the recorder at all times
may cause the person to control their behavior. (Note that the
legality of recording without a person's knowledge varies from state to
state.)
-- edp
|
965.27 | It's good to be aware | BRAT::JOSEPHSON | | Thu Feb 01 1990 13:13 | 44 |
| You are in a tough situation but it is wise that you are concerned over
working with such an individual.
Many years ago I worked in another industry and had a similar problem.
Three women (myself included) were frequently propositioned by a man
who refused to take no for an answer. When he would say inappropriate
things to me, I would very loudly respond "THAT'S UNPROFESSIONAL. DO
NOT SAY THINGS LIKE THAT TO ME. IF YOU CONTINUE, I WILL REPORT YOU."
Unfortunately the buffoon continued with all three women. The three
of us got together one day, made notes of our experiences and went
directly to personnel. Of course, personnel made light of it....this
was in the early l970's when this was not taken very seriously.
Then we went to the VP of the company whom we trusted and gave him the
facts. He listened and brought the buffoon into the room so his side
could be heard. Needless to say, later that afternoon the buffoon
packed his office and was not to be heard from again.
My advice to you:
1. Be cautious and prepared. It's better to be aware than caught in a
compromising situation.
2. Don't be afraid to say that his behavior is inappropriate to his
face if something happens.....SAY IT LOUDLY!!!! Maybe others will hear
and back you up.
3. Never be alone with him.
4. Express your concerns to your manager. It doesn't have to be
accusing but merely this is what I've heard and I am concerned. That
way your manager has been told and is aware also.
5. Since he's been caught before, he may not be willing to pull
anything again and jeopardize his job so you're probably safe.....but
keep your guard up anyway.
6. Keep it professional, cool, and distant. Don't jeopardize your
reputation because of some jerk who can't act civilized.
Good Luck.....
Nancy
|
965.28 | I think I'm already understanding feminism | CADSYS::BAY | J.A.P.P. | Thu Feb 01 1990 21:34 | 22 |
| I'm a guy, and as such, its far less likely that I should have to fear
being the recipient of such treatment.
But I get the heebie-jeebies just thinking that there are men like that
around me. I mean, they won't bother *ME*, but just the thought that
they would do such a thing to ANYONE makes me think of brushing myself
off after being near such a person. It makes me want to look nervously
over my shoulder, wondering about those around me.
And yet, theres at least a possiblility that I have, do or will work
with someone like that, and might never know it.
Its sort've like the feeling I had after my car was stolen and returned.
It was filthy inside, but the dirt wasn't what bothered me. It was
being *IN* a car where "those people" had been. Sitting in the seat
where they were.
I admire anyone that can handle staying in such a situation. I don't
think I could.
Jim
|
965.29 | Reply | WMOIS::B_REINKE | if you are a dreamer, come in.. | Fri Feb 02 1990 14:22 | 34 |
|
Reply from the basenote writer
Bonnie J =wn= comod
*****************************************************************
I'm sorry to take so long to clarify this, but I didn't have a
chance to read notes earlier.
I don't know exactly what degree of assault took place between my
friend and her supervisor. I know he attempted to kiss her, and
that by the time the janitor actually entered the room, the
supervisor was on the other side of the table. The janitor was
able to confirm that my friend was very upset but she didn't see
anything that actually happened, so it was my friend's word
against his. And personnel felt that my freind had contributed to
the incident by being attractive and friendly.
My friend told me about it when I was considering taking a job
that would have reported to him. She didn't want me putting
myself in a dangerous position by accident. She told me only the
minimum to get me to take it seriously, not enough to really
violate confidentiality.
I appreciate all the good advice I'm getting, both here and off
line. In a crazy way it helps to know that this isn't an isolated
incident. I don't feel so much like I'm dealing with someone
who's unbalanced. He's part of a social problem!
The problem with making sure we're not alone together is that this
is a friendly group where we normally work in small teams and
socialize outside of work, often at odd hours. It will be pretty
hard to work differently with this man without others suspecting
what's wrong.
|
965.31 | My 2 cents | PSYCHE::LEUNG | | Tue Feb 06 1990 19:47 | 48 |
| My husband's the DECCIE but I'd like to give some encouragement -
though not necessarily advice - as those given by several women here
have been very good. I'm an Equal Opportunity Specialist with a US govt
agency and part of my job is investigating complaints of sexual
harrassment.
The advice on keeping a journal is excellent because if anything
happens to you, you'll need it. Speaking or giving a written memo to
your manager is also necessary, since that establishes the fact that
you've notified Management of your concern. Once that happens, DEC is
liable for whatever is eventually proven to have been done by one of
their employees.
It's sad but true that being a woman in the workforce today is
particularly taxing, because we have to balance our need to build our
careers with self-preservation. Because of this, many many women are
afraid to make waves; so like rape, the number of cases reported are
only a tiny fraction of the actual incidences of harrassment.
For starters, being a federal contractor (receiving federal $ to supply
goods and services), DEC is subject to federal regulations re sex
discrimination, along with many employment-related requirements. I
don't have the regs with me, but the sex discrimination citation is
41CFR60-20. I think the sexual harrassment guidelines are prescribed
therein. Let me know if you want specifics.
Sexual harrassment is extremely pervasive; however, there's more talk
of it now, so hopefully, some good will come of it. I remember how on
my first job out of college the president of the company used to find
an excuse to touch me every so often. I didn't know what to do about
it, but felt unhappy and uneasy. Of course at the time (1978) I didn't
even know it was called "sexual harrassment." Looking back, having to
deal with that type of thing really affected my job and career, because
I was always afraid to say anything for fear of offending him. Even
things short of assault can affect a woman's employment in nasty ways.
It isn't fair and must be stopped.
I find that over the years, I've acquired certain more mature ways to
handle these tedious annoyances. I can hold my own now, but haven't
seen a decrease in this type of thing in the workplace. Luckily, there
are mechanisms in place now for women to file complaints against men
who make repeated unwanted physical or verbal advances. They can also
file a complaint of retaliation if they suffer a backlash because of
the original complaint.
Courage!
-Stella
|
965.32 | Men are victims too! | AIMHI::SCHELBERG | | Mon Feb 19 1990 10:26 | 20 |
| Hi, I work in Personnel and .31 is right. If you tell your manager and
Personnel - DEC is responsible for what that person does. If you tell
them your fears and keep a journal and report anything that happens
to you to your manager/Personnel they have to act on it.
I would work with this person but let all the right people know what
you found out and that you are going to be cautious and keep a journal
and if he does anything harrassing report him immediately.
re: 28
Just to let you know....sexual harassment does not just happen
to women. There have been men who have reported sexual harassment
by women supervisor/managers and also by other men who have harassed
them. Since it's usually a woman who gets harrassed we assume it's
only a "woman" problem but it's not. - Women harrass too believe
it or not! harassment is everyone's problem and there should be
alot of awareness about this so we can put this to an end.
|
965.33 | Some suggestions if action is necessary | SONATA::ERVIN | Roots & Wings... | Mon Feb 19 1990 11:51 | 114 |
|
I hope that this note is not too overdue, but I've been looking for
some reference materials that might clarify my reply.
To the base noter, my call is that you should try to work with this man
and not say anything to him that you have knowledge of a prior
harassment charge brought against him. Why put him on the defensive
if, perhaps, he has reformed his behavior.
If he says or does anything that you feel is harassment, please take
into consideration that actions that Mary Rowe recommends, exerpts from
her article appear below. If you want a complete copy of her article,
have one of the moderators notify me and I will send a hard copy to
that mod to be forwarded to you. Or contact me directly if you feel
comfortable with that.
Regards,
Laura
*************************************************************
Mary P. Rowe who specializes in conflict resolution has written an article
re: dealing with harassment. To quote from her article (I have not
included the entire article):
Complainants must be willing to take action themselves in a rational and
responsible way. To many people this may seem unjust since it appears to
put a double burden on the offended person. This concern makes sense. But
I recommend such action because it works and because nothing else really
works as well.
Moreover, it helps offended persons to focus their anger outside themselves
instead of becoming sick or depressed, which often happens otherwise.
Finally, such measures may be the only way to obtain evidence for
management (or the courts) to act on.
Writing a letter: One method that works quite consistently, even when many
verbal requests have failed, is for the offended person to write a letter
to the accused. I usually recommend a polite, low-key letter (which may
necessitate many drafts).
The letter I recommend has three parts. The first part should be a
detailed statement of the facts as the writer sees them: "This is what I
think happened..." I encourage a precise rendition of all facts and dates
relevant to the alleged harassment. This section is sometimes very long.
In the second part of the letter, writers should describe their feelings
and what damage they think has been done. This is where opinions belong.
"Your action made me feel terrible"; "I am deeply embarrassed and worried
that my parents will hear about this"; "You have caused me to ask for a
transfer (change my career objectives; drop out of the training course;
take excessive time off; or whatever)." The writer should mention any
perceived or actual costs and damages, along with feelings of dismay,
distrust, revulsion, misery and so on.
Finally, I recommend a short statement of what the accuser would like to
have happen next. Since most persons only want the harassment to end, the
letter might finish by saying so: "I ask that our relationship from now on
be on a purely professional basis."
Someone who know that he or she contributed to the problem does well to say
so: "Although we once were happy dating, it is important to me that we now
reestablish a formal and professional relationship, and I ask you to do
so."
If the letter writer believes some remedy or recompense is in order, this
is the place to say so: "Please withdraw my last evaluation until we can
work out a fair one"; "I will need a written answer as to the reference you
will provide from now on"; and statements of that type.
What happens next: The complainant should, if possible, deliver the letter
in person to know that it arrived and when it arrived. When necessary, a
plainclothes police officer, security person, or some other protector
and/or witness should accompany the writer or be present when the letter is
delivered. The writer of the letter should keep a copy.
Usually the recipient simply accepts the letter, says nothing, and reforms
his or her behavior. Sometimes there is an apology, an astounded opening
of discussion, or a denial. Rarely will the recipient reply in writing to
"set the record straight." Nearly always, the alleged harassment stops.
Obviously, it is now more dangerous for the recipient of such a letter to
harass the employee. The letter constitutes an attempt to settle the
problem peaceably.
A good letter is useful if the complainant later feels the need to appeal
to high-level management, especially if the writer can prove it was
delivered. It can also, if necessary, constitute invaluable legal
evidence. Such letters are usually enough to stop a mildly disturbed
aggressor-for example, someone who importunes with sexual innuendo and
suggestions for sexual activity.
Even if a written order or request to stop harassment does not succeed, in
my experience the complainant is always better off for having tried to stop
the offense in a direct and unambiguous way.
Finally, and possibly most important, taking action in this or similar ways
often has a powerful effect on all participants. Taut nerves relax as
victims learn they can protect themselves. Insomniacs get needed sleep.
Productivity improves.
Both persons are likely to feel better about themselves. Aggressors
sometimes turn for help, through which their self-esteem may rise. They
may also stop harassing people, thus sparing those who could have become
victims; this often matters greatly to the person who takes action.
For all these reasons I strongly encourage persons who feel harassed to
take action themselves if possible.
Exerpts reprinted without permission from Harvard Business Review: When the
Executive is a Woman - Reprints of selected articles.
|