T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
917.1 | my attempt at Dear Abby | ASDS::RSMITH | | Thu Dec 28 1989 13:32 | 40 |
|
I have a few thoughts for you. It would seem to me that there are only
2 reasons why this woman would decide not to become intimate with you.
One being that she is simply not attracted to you and two being that
she is attracted to you, thouroughly enjoys your company but is afraid
to become intimate. What I mean by #2 is that, should something happen
between you, she would no longer be able to ignore her feelings for you
and then if you decided NOT to leave your family, she would be left
alone and hurt. I would guess from the things you have done together
that reason #1 is invalid. Personally, I am engaged and if some man
whom I was friendly with told me that he was in love with me, I would
avoid him. ( Unless I was attracted to him. ) This is why I think that
she is attracted to you.
Furthur support for hypothesis #2: every woman has heard over and over
about being "the other woman". The scenario generally goes that "the
other woman" falls hook, line and sinker for this married man. Then
the married man remembers why he married his wife in the first place
and dumps "the other woman". Also, if this woman really likes you, she
may feel that if anything physical were to happen the intrigue would be
over for you and you would stop seeing her.
Solution : (and this may be more advice than you bargained for)
If you are so unhappy with your wife that you were able to fall for
another woman, then you should be fairly certain that you don't want to
spend the rest of your life with her. Also, I've found a good rule to
follow is 'never leave one person for another. Leave one person
regardless of another.' So, if you would leave your wife "for her"
then perhaps you should evalute if you would leave your wife "for you".
If you leave your wife for this woman and it doesn't work out, your
family is still gone.
Question:
I am getting married in 4 months. Why did you fall for another woman?
How can I avoid that happening? (You can mail me a note if you'd
rather.)
Please take this all well. I meant to help.
Rachael
|
917.2 | addendum: OOPS! | ASDS::RSMITH | | Thu Dec 28 1989 13:39 | 11 |
|
ADDENDUM:
what I meant by the line "if I were attracted to him" was a sentiment
from my single days. In the present tense, even if I were attracted to
someone, if they told me that they loved me, I would avoid them. I
don't think that sexual tension should be encouraged in a work
environment or with people other that your spouse. (sense some
idealism?)
That's all
|
917.3 | | DZIGN::STHILAIRE | Keep on rockin in the free world | Thu Dec 28 1989 13:47 | 29 |
| Re .1, interesting. I think it's possible that she might not be
attracted to him. It is possible for a woman to really enjoy a
man's company (just like a girlfriend) and still not be physically
attracted enough to want to have sex. It's possible that his
friendship and companionship fulfills a need for her, but that she
just isn't physically attracted. Another possibility could be that
she is using his attraction for her in order get to go on these
weekend outings. (I guess that might depend on her financial
situation, and his. If his is a lot better than hers, it's a
possibility that she's using him for free recreation, but doesn't
want to have to include sex.) Of course, it's also possible that
she is attracted but that she's afraid of getting hurt, or that
she thinks its really a horrible thing to have sex with a married
man. It depends on how conventional her morals are.
I think that, on the surface, it's easy to tell .0 that he shouldn't
leave his wife for another woman. But, I don't think life is always
that clear cut and simple. It could be that if he can't have this
particular woman he's fallen in love with, that he'd just as soon
live with his present wife forever.
I do think, though, that if .0 feels he cannot control himself much
longer, and the woman in question does not want to have sex
with him, then he should stop inviting her on these little outings.
Why keep creating the situation unless she changes her mind about
sex?
Lorna
|
917.4 | | SA1794::CHARBONND | Mail SPMFG1::CHARBONND | Thu Dec 28 1989 13:55 | 10 |
| To echo what was said in .1, if you *would* leave your
wife, then *do* so.
For myself, I won't get involved with someone who's
already involved elsewhere. 'Get yourself free, then we'll
talk.' Maybe she's waiting for you to assert yourself with
actions and not just words. Or maybe she isn't too keen
on a guy with a 'fallback position'.
|
917.5 | Hm | ASDS::RSMITH | | Thu Dec 28 1989 14:02 | 21 |
| Lorna,
I guess you're right, but I think the woman would have to be sort of
cruel to either hang out with him for free recreation or because he
fills some need in her. I mean if she was really his friend and she
wasn't attracted to him, then wouldn't she avoid him, for his benefit?
It seems like she's encouraging him to be in love with her. If she has
no intensions of ever returning that emotion, that seems pretty cruel.
I agree. If .0 can't control himself anymore, then he should avoid the
situation.
I don't understand how .0 could fall in love with another woman unless
he was already out of love with his wife. I mean, if he was in love
with his wife, he should never have gone out for drinks and dancing
with this woman. I guess I could understand if he and his wife were no
longer intimate with each other and he was looking for a purely
physical relationship, but that doesn't sound like that's all he's after.
Rachael
|
917.6 | | ASDS::RSMITH | | Thu Dec 28 1989 14:14 | 12 |
|
Another thought:
If he still loves his wife, then why did he post this problem on a
network where anyone in digital can read it an figure out who he is?
Maybe his wife doesn't know anyone at Digital?
Also, how could he get away for several weekends all without his wife
knowing?
My point is that if he was still in love with his wife, wouldn't he be
more worried about her finding out?
Rachael
|
917.7 | you asked for it... | DECWET::JWHITE | ohio sons of the revolution | Thu Dec 28 1989 14:57 | 7 |
|
as an extremely happy married man who falls in love with 'other
women' all the time, i would suggest you tell her as openly and
clearly as possible. then, don't be surprised if she says something
like, 'but you're *married*'. this means that she probably senses
that getting involved with you would probably be a bad idea.
|
917.8 | | ASDS::RSMITH | | Thu Dec 28 1989 15:07 | 12 |
|
.7
He already had told her.
And what do you mean? You are a happily married man who falls in love
with other women all of the time. Do you and your wife have an open
marriage? If not, aren't you being unfaithful to your wife by having
affairs of the heart ( or affairs period)?
Or do you mean that you just find lots of women attractive?
Rachael
|
917.9 | Tangentially related... | LOWLIF::HUXTABLE | Who enters the dance must dance. | Thu Dec 28 1989 16:13 | 35 |
| re .5 and a couple of others
> I don't understand how .0 could fall in love with another woman unless
> he was already out of love with his wife...
I'm hypothesizing, but based on the people I know...I
generally use "in love" or "falling in love" to mean that
giddy, dizzy, wonderfully excited feeling you get when you're
attracted to someone who is (usually) attracted to you. And
I generally use "I love <person>" to mean the act of will
involved in having a caring, growing relationship with said
person. For example, I love my sister...but I'm not in love
with her!
I don't see why .0 couldn't be "in love" with both his wife
and another woman at the same time. Some people who are "in
love" seem never to fall "in love" with someone else at the
same time; others of us (like me) seem to have no trouble
having that giddy "in love" feeling about several people at
the same time. It doesn't necessarily mean that I pursue sex
with whoever I am "in love" with (the feeling itself is often
more fun and usually much less work!), nor does it
necessarily mean that I will pursue a loving non-sexual
friendship with such a person, although I usually do. I
simply don't see any conflict between the *feeling* of being
"in love" with several people while *choosing the action* of
monogamy with one particular person whom I both love and am
in love with.
It is quite easy, in our culture, to confuse "love" and "in
love" both with each other and with such sentiments as "want
to have sex with" and "want to be monogamous with" and "want
to spend the rest of my life with."
-- Linda
|
917.10 | brief responses, more later perhaps | DECWET::JWHITE | ohio sons of the revolution | Thu Dec 28 1989 16:41 | 9 |
|
re:.8
re: already telling her
if he's already told her and she has not responded, i should think
the whole thing would be clear.
re: love
i fall in love all the time. what i do about it is another question.
|
917.11 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | Can you feel the heat? | Fri Dec 29 1989 10:13 | 15 |
| I hate it when I'm sick for a day and miss an intriguing base note! :-}
re: love
I think it is possible to be in love with more than one person at a time, at
least for some people.
I think that you shouldn't leave your spouse/lover only for another. If you
are going to make a life change, it ought to be because it is the right thing
to do for you, not that it would be more convenient for your relationship with
someone else. It seems that everytime I see someone leave their spouse/lover
for another, the situation deteriorates, and the person who left ends up out
in the cold, wondering WHY s/he left in the first place.
The Doctah
|
917.12 | Not a friend of mine! | TLE::D_CARROLL | Who am I to disagree? | Thu Jan 04 1990 12:06 | 27 |
| I din't read the base note (it's gone) but I wanted to respond to this:
(Rachael)
> fills some need in her. I mean if she was really his friend and she
> wasn't attracted to him, then wouldn't she avoid him, for his benefit?
I have heard this notion over and over, and thoroughly disagree with it.
I have often been in a situation where someone had feelings for me that I
didn't share. However, I valued their friendship and they valued mine,
and I didn't think it was my right or responsibility to make a decision
to break of that relationship "for his or her own good."
If I am honest and open about my feelings for the other person, and I want
to remain friends with them, it is up to *them* to decide is they want to
continue the friendship. How can I suggest that I know better than them
whether my friendship is more important to them than my attraction, whether
the pain of being around me is greater or less than the pleasure of my
friendship, whether my presence is healthy or harmful? If my friend decides
that if I can't love him/her, then s/he doesn't want me around, I will
understand and abide by those wishes.
I for one would be very upset if someone who claimed to be my friend started
avoiding me against my wishes "for my own good". :-P While the intentions
may be good, I think they are misplaced. Let the friend decide what is
important and healthy for him or herself.
D!
|