T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
861.1 | pointers | LEZAH::BOBBITT | at night, the ice weasels come... | Mon Nov 13 1989 10:15 | 6 |
| FYI, this is also discussed in womannotes-V1:
topic 237 - women's clothing
topic 568 - how do you size up women?
-Jody
|
861.2 | Shopping - a major waste of time | GEMVAX::CICCOLINI | | Mon Nov 13 1989 10:40 | 43 |
| Are we assuming all the buyers are vain females? That's quite an
answer - "Buyers don't want standardization". To hell with the
female customer, huh? Let's give they buyers what they want.
Unfortunately, in my cynicism, I believe that's true. But the reason
buyers don't want standard sizing isn't because all buyers are females
who want to eat like horses and tell their friends they wear size 5s.
Vagueness and confusion is part and parcel in the sale of "fashion",
(as opposed to the sale of "clothing"). The very concept of "fashion"
is somewhat vague, doesn't really stand up to black and white
scrutinization and certainly would cease to exist if it were forced
into "standardization". What good is it for the "fashion" industry
if a woman finds that a size 8 A line skirt is just perfect for her?
Where does that leave all the other designers who want her money
too? Unless they make a size 8 A line skirt just like everyone
else, they're lost. But if they can create customers who resign
themselves to accepting this vagueness, they can sell them a size
8 skirt they'll be willing to diet into or compensate for some other
way, rather than rejecting the sale outright. If only one manufacturer
were so vague, they wouldn't get any sales. But if they're ALL
vague, sheer tedium and hopelessness can make a woman buy what she
wouldn't otherwise.
Hense the vagueness around hemlines, around what's "in" and what's
"out", (the very concept of "in" and "out"), and certainly around
sizing so that women must "shop" as an actual time-consuming activity
rather than just "go buy a skirt" and that's that.
The "clothing" industry, (which for women is miniscule), is pretty
much standard in sizing. The "fashion" industry, (which is huge,
and which we are supposed to confuse with "clothing"), is the shell
game.
And one last fact, (I read this from someone who works in "fashion")-
when a manufacturer of a fashion item gets a call for some size
10s and they are out of them, they can just rip out the labels of
size 8s and 12s and make the sale! They would have lost the sale
if the store said, "Hey, wait a minute - these aren't 10s!" But
the stores can't, (cuz who knows what a real size 10 is, anyway?!),
and don't really want to because this way, women have to spend more
time in the store. And isn't that a major goal of any store??? To
hell with the woman customer. Let her shop till she drops!
|
861.3 | One recent experience | DEMING::FOSTER | | Mon Nov 13 1989 11:49 | 17 |
|
I went shopping on Saturday with a friend who takes a 3/4. We were
trying on evening wear, and one of the saleswomen saw the dress that we
were going to try on and said; "I'm a 3/4 - this dress runs small in
the bust. Try a 7/8." So, my friend tried a 7/8. It was a bit small in
the bust and fit the rest of her. 'ren the pear takes at 12-14 dress.
But not wanting to have it fall off, I tried a 10. Fit perfectly.
I then fell in love with another dress, again a 12, but wanted it in
another color. We went to a sister store that only had it in a 10. The
10 looked better than the 12. Now, I'll admit that I've lost a lot of
weight, but I do NOT have a size 10 derriere.
On the other hand, being able to say "oh yes, its a size 10" does have
a certain ring to it that I like.
hee hee
|
861.4 | size ... a philosophical question | DNEAST::FIRTH_CATHY | owl | Mon Nov 13 1989 13:12 | 29 |
| Sizing also has to do with the "label" you are buying. I wear from
size 8 to size 16 depending on where I buy my clothes, the price of the
clothes, and the cut of the clothes.
I read an article not too long ago that compared sizing of, say 12, to
what the same measurements would have been awarded in the 50's and it
was a 14. I always end up starting with a 12 and going up or down from
there.
This is why I shop for clothes once a year. Some years I add to my
summer wardrobe other years it is the winter wardrobe that gets
updated.
I find shopping tedious because If you see a skirt you like, there are
no blouses your size and God help you if you purchase the skirt
thinking that you will match it up later. Unless, of course, black or
what will do.
Also any color that I even remotely like to wear is not "in" this year
so I have a small selection to choose from. Example: I love yellow -
but if I wear it, people inquire about my health because I have such
sallow skin - so the years that pale pastels are "what everyone is
wearing my dear" are the years I skip the annual hassle!
This leaves out the fact that invariable whatever size I am for THAT
particular store - they are out of it and when you place an order - 2
months later they call to say none could be found......
|
861.5 | more complex yet | CASPRO::LUST | Flights of Fantasy | Mon Nov 13 1989 14:10 | 21 |
| Actually, the situation is even better? than different lines,
manufacturers, etc. Different pieces (eg. two identical skirts) can
actually be different measurements also. The reason - per a friend
who used to be a sewer in a factory - is that, while all of the pieces
of the material are cut the same size, when the person is sewing them,
the machine sews the seam, *then* trims off material an exact distance
from the seam (how did you think they all get so even?). So if the
person is being slow and careful, they will sew closer to the edge, and
only a small amount will be trimmed off - but these people are usually
paid *by the piece* and are therefore in a hurry, and the amount of
material trimmed off can vary radically from item to item.
So... if you see something you like, trying on more than one identical
in the same size will sometimes you will find one that fits you better
than others.
BTW, the reason some of the more expensive lines tend to "fit truer" is
that they pay the sewers better, who will therefore go slower and be
more careful!
Linda
|
861.6 | | DZIGN::STHILAIRE | post punk chic | Tue Nov 14 1989 14:29 | 33 |
| As long as I can find my size, I usually don't have a problem finding
clothes that fit. I take a size 3 dress in juniors, or a size 2
petite in what is usually called "better dresses" or misses sizes.
Usually I know that if I can find a size 3, the dress will fit.
The trick is finding a size 3. Most stores seem to only get in
one size 3 of each style and if you don't buy it when you see it,
it will be gone. Saturday was an exception, tho, because I tried
on a size 3 dress that hung on me like a tent. I swear it was at
least a 7 marked wrong. I should have complained about it but I
didn't feel up to it, besides I had no intention of buying the dress
anyway. I was just trying it on for fun, because I'm one of those
people who thinks clothes shopping is fun and relaxing.
The one thing that annoys me about clothes sizes is "one size fits
all." No "one size fits all" garment was ever small enough to fit
a size 3!!!! so they do *not* fit all! In fact, most clothes that
come in a Small, Medium or Large do not fit me either. The Small
is usually a 7, I'd say.
Jeans are the most trouble. In some brands size 3 fits perfectly
and size 5 hangs like a sack. In some brands I can't even zip the
size 3 and size 5 fits perfectly.
Skirt waists can be very different, too. Sometimes I can't button
the size 3, and other times the size 5 droops to halfway down my
legs.
But, I just look at it as all part of the fun of shopping. If I
had a few thousand to spend on clothes, I could easily put up with
the hassle!
Lorna
|
861.7 | Petite Blues | RUTLND::SWINDELLS | | Wed Nov 15 1989 07:54 | 27 |
| re: .6
I agree with you too. I also wear size 0-2 petites, or a size 3 in the
juniors. Trying to find these size clothes is a joke, most of them are
the ugliest colors, styles, etc. that I tend to think the designers are
making them just to say they make small sizes.
I also love going into the Petite speciality stores for women 5'4" and
under, finding something that actually fits, but not being able to
afford to buy it because it's so expensive. I've never been able to
figure out why the clothes are so outrageously priced!!!!
What really irritates me the most is finding something that fits, but
it is so long, it drags on the floor. I'm just under 5', which means
that when I find something that fits, I have to go home and take about
1' of material off of what I just bought. If I got a penny for
everything I've had to re-hem, I wouldn't be working, that's for sure.
I'm under the impression the word "Petite" stands for a woman that's
5'6" or above and weighs in about 135 lbs. who likes to tell all her
friends that she wears a size 3 Petite!!
Being small definitely has it's disadvantages, it really does....
Donalea
|
861.8 | "Do you have Petites in, er, size tall?" | LOWLIF::HUXTABLE | Who enters the dance must dance. | Wed Nov 15 1989 14:44 | 11 |
| .7> I'm under the impression the word "Petite" stands for a woman that's
.7> 5'6" or above and weighs in about 135 lbs. who likes to tell all her
.7> friends that she wears a size 3 Petite!!
I'm 5'7" and near 150 lbs...and simply can not find clothes
to fit me. (As my taste in clothes gets more expensive, I
get progressively more irritated at spending money on clothes
that don't fit. I'm going to take up sewing.) But maybe I
should try shopping in the Petite stores first... ;) :)
-- Linda
|
861.9 | My shirts button on the WRONG side. | CSC32::K_KINNEY | | Wed Nov 15 1989 15:54 | 25 |
|
And for all that, we get to pay WHAT???
I was just reading this note and talking to myself about
how for years I have been wearing PANTS and I tend to
purchase my shirts from the boys department. The reason
why I do this is because I found myself faced with clothes
that were not well stitched, made of flimsy material, and
costing twice what I could buy mens shirts for. Besides,
my arms apparently are longer than the womens clothing designers
believe they should be (no I do NOT resemble a gorilla *8^} )
I came across a cartoon by Cathy Guisewite in the paper the
other day and just HAD to cut it out. She goes into a clothing
store and she selects a shirt and comments "This blouse is $150??"
The clerk replies "Isn't it fun?! It's styled, sized and tailored
exactly like a mans's shirt!". Cathy says "The exact same shirt
in the men's department is only $80." The clerk confirms this.
Cathy then challenges "How can you charge $70 more for the
exact same shirt?!" The clerk says "We're trying to keep up
with the lingere department where you buy $6 men's underwear
for $37.50."
arrrgghh!
|
861.10 | | ULTRA::ZURKO | We're more paranoid than you are. | Wed Nov 15 1989 16:12 | 3 |
| Hey, I have a question: Are the shirt sleeves on women's clothes long enough
for anyone? Or are they always either too long or too short.
Mez
|
861.11 | | RAINBO::TARBET | You can trust me, I'm a mod | Wed Nov 15 1989 16:20 | 3 |
| No, they're NEVER too short, Mez! Trust me. :-}
=maggie
|
861.12 | Just call me Generic Woman | BSS::VANFLEET | Living my Possibilities | Wed Nov 15 1989 16:22 | 6 |
| I guess my arms must be average in length because most blouses and
sweaters seem to be about right for my arm length. I occassionally get
that ape-like look on a blouse or sweater (arms hang down below my
knees) but that happens very rarely.
Nanci
|
861.13 | | FSHQA1::AWASKOM | | Wed Nov 15 1989 16:28 | 8 |
| This appears to be the one place that I am 'average'. All my life
I have been able to 'walk into' clothes that fit. Currently a 10,
almost any 10 (used to be an 8, but that changed a coupla years
back).
But why are nightgown sleeves always shorter than dress sleeves?
Alison
|
861.14 | | SSDEVO::GALLUP | the mirror speaks, the reflection lies | Wed Nov 15 1989 16:32 | 25 |
|
You'll rarely ever see me wearing a shirt with buttoned cuffs
cuz they are always too short on me.
I make a lot of my clothes. I find it enjoyable, easy, and
fun. I can adapt patterns to fit ME perfectly, and don't
have to worry about wrong sizes.
But, alas...even patterns differ in size. If I bought the
size pattern that McCalls says I should (ie, by measurements)
it would look like a potato sack on me.......yet, when I buy
French patterns (Burda, New Look, etc) I have to buy BIGGER
than the size it says because otherwise I would never fit
into it.....
I'm pretty thankful that a lot of the pattern companies are
now going to multi-size patterns in one package. Whew!
Next project.......some wool skirts and jackets! Lined!
Cheap, beautiful and they actually fit like a glove! ;-)
kat
|
861.15 | | CSC32::WOLBACH | | Wed Nov 15 1989 16:39 | 16 |
|
As the mom of a 10 year old boy, I can tell you that boys
clothing is no bargain either. His pants cost at least as
much as mine, and are more expensive than his dad's. And
kids clothing doesn't go on sale as often or as highly re-
duced as adult clothing. And fit? That's a joke! Pants
are either too long or too big around...
Sleeve length on women's clothing? Simple. Shirt sleeves
are always too long; sweater sleeves are invariably too
short.
Now the real question is: why do clothing manufacturers
think a woman with 40 inch hips has ankles with a 4 inch
circumference?
|
861.16 | Not gorilla arms, just broad shoulders | LOWLIF::HUXTABLE | Who enters the dance must dance. | Wed Nov 15 1989 16:44 | 14 |
| Sleeve lengths on me are usually either 1) too short, or 2)
just fine, except that the *shoulder* seam needs to be about
two inches farther out. Fortunately, in the last decade
blouses with padded shoulders are "in," so I just buy one of
these so-called oversized blouses, take out the shoulder
pads, and presto!, a blouse that (mostly) fits.
Seriously, I often go to the men's department and buy a size
15-32/33, tapered fit. These invariably fit through
shoulders, aren't too snug through the bust, and the style is
acceptable for much of what I wear (suits). When I want a
silky, feminine blouse...that takes longer.
-- Linda
|
861.17 | it's a conspiracy | GLDCMP::KOLBE | The dilettante debutante | Wed Nov 15 1989 16:46 | 18 |
|
< You'll rarely ever see me wearing a shirt with buttoned cuffs
< cuz they are always too short on me.
I'm with you Kat. It's hard to find shirts with long enough sleeves.
I usually wear cotton and sleeves that fit when I buy are usually
too short after the first wash. Why don't they pre-shrink
ANYTHING!!!
And then there's pants! I'm only 5'4", if I can't find a petite in
my size I have to cut off several inches of pants leg. Maybe I need
to have you give me sewing lessons. :*) liesl
p.s. I love those black stretch leggings, they fit, they're
comfortable and they move when you do. Now if I could just get folks
to stop asking if I forgot to put on my skirt when I wear them as
pants. :*)
|
861.18 | Broad shoulders-Bad Karma? | CSC32::K_KINNEY | | Wed Nov 15 1989 16:51 | 16 |
|
Ok. Broad shoulders is pretty good here. I got those too.
I did cave in and purchase a really nice looking shirt
like you were just mentioning this weekend (with the pads
and stuff) and took the thing home and washed it in cold
water to get the store smell out of it before I wore it
to work. IT SHRANK!!!! another arrrggh! I suppose it should
have been dry cleaned but there was no indication on it
to this effect. (I thought that was a rule. Besides, mens
permanent press, tailored, European cut shirts don't do
that to me). Anyhow, where the darn thing shrank was through
the sleeves and shoulders. Taking it back...then back to
the mens department yet. What do ya think? Bad karma?
kim *8^}
|
861.19 | arghhh | WR2FOR::OLSON_DO | temporary home of skylrk::olson | Wed Nov 15 1989 17:51 | 13 |
| re .15, Deb-
> Now the real question is: why do clothing manufacturers
> think a woman with 40 inch hips has ankles with a 4 inch
> circumference?
I'm having a hard time picturing this...how does one get one's
foot through the ankle opening without ripping it open? Surely
you don't buy it ripped all to shreds?
[this is meant in commiseration, Deb, I am *not* teasing.]
DougO
|
861.20 | | SSDEVO::GALLUP | open your eyes to a miracle | Wed Nov 15 1989 18:33 | 19 |
|
I rarely ever buy pants either........(jeans are a b!tch to
buy).
I'm 5'8".....that makes me taller than average, and shorter
than tall. I can't even buy the leggings that liesl wears
without having them be over my ankles!!!
I make anything like that....and jeans...well, when I wear
jeans, I slurge and get a really good pair that fit good.
And Levi's for Women are NOT made for women! ;-) (At least
not any woman I've see...well, Carol Champion fits quite
nicely into them.)
:-)
kath
|
861.21 | | CSC32::WOLBACH | | Thu Nov 16 1989 01:54 | 13 |
| Well, ok, Doug....I exagerated a little. But really, the current
style is tapered legs. And they really taper at the ankle. Some
pants even have pleats or darts at the ankle, to taper MORE! Of
course some also have zippers at the ankle.
I'll bet now that I've mentioned it, you'll start to notice what
I mean (if you haven't noticed before).
Actually, getting the pants on isn't a real problem. Taking them
of is a struggle though!
Deb
|
861.22 | | VINO::BOBBITT | | Thu Nov 16 1989 07:21 | 10 |
| Another long-armed woman speaks up. My wrists almost always show below
the cuff of any given woman's shirt/blouse. Not so with men's.
And if you're looking for preshrunk which you can try on before you
purchase, go to my favorite glamour haven, the Salvay Armay....very
inexpensive, and often surprisingly good quality if you actually LOOK
for it.
-Jody
|
861.23 | One size fits one, not all | IAMOK::KOSKI | This ::NOTE is for you | Thu Nov 16 1989 08:53 | 9 |
| Re Levis for Woman, I always wondered about this one, at 5'10" I fit
perfectly into size 10 Levis for woman. Which leads me to wonder how
"average" woman ever find jeans.
As for those of us with arms down to our toes...I found at least one
catalog company, Royal Silk Co., that cuts it's blouses very
generously, in length and sleeves.
Gail
|
861.24 | good news and bad news | WMOIS::B_REINKE | if you are a dreamer, come in.. | Thu Nov 16 1989 20:00 | 17 |
| Recently I've lost about 18 pounds and have about 8 more that
I am working on. Most of my clothes now swim on me...so I am
looking to buy some new things...I got an Avon catalogue that
had come to my daughter and used a tape measure to figure out
what size I am now...
well my bust size was 2 above my hips (tho both are the same
dimensions) and my waist was 6 above my hips...I'm also working
out to help the disparity, but I'm not looking forward to going
back into the stores even if I could *afford* to replace my
entire wardrobe...
any hints as to how to make my current clothes look better on
a minimal budget (I don't sew - not lack of skill or interest,
lack of time).
Bonnie
|
861.25 | Knits! | FRICK::HUTCHINS | Same monkeys, different trees... | Fri Nov 17 1989 10:43 | 13 |
| re .24
Bonnie,
The Limited "Express" store has some great knits that work well during
"between" sizes. (I'm sure Marshall's, T.J.'s, etc. carry knits as
well.) With a couple of fun accessories (large scarves, belts,
necklaces), you can extend your wardrobe.
These clothes are great on the mornings when the thought of ironing
just doesn't fit the schedule.
Judi
|
861.26 | | VINO::BOBBITT | my home cluster's all afluster | Fri Nov 17 1989 11:45 | 9 |
| re .24
depending on how "not perfectly" they fit,
belts
slouch hats (makes the "loose look" look intentional)
eccentric accessories that focus attention
-Jody
|
861.27 | high waters | RUSTIE::NALE | | Fri Nov 17 1989 16:06 | 10 |
|
Let's hear it for "high waters"! You know what I mean, those pants that don't
even make it to your ankles? Those pants that make it look like you're
auditioning for "Revenge of the Nerds, Part IV"?
My solution for too-long arms (or is it too-short sleeves?) is simple: roll them
up (the sleeves, that is).
Sue
|