T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
694.1 | | LACV01::BOISVERT | | Tue Jul 11 1989 12:52 | 17 |
| I got married last November and my maitron-of-honor (sister) held
a Jack and Jill in our honor. She just went to a print studio and
had simple tickets made up. She sold tickets for about $10.00 a
head.
We had close to a hundred guests. Gifts are *NOT* given at Jack
and Jills. The money for the tickets paid for the DJ, hall, and
munchies.
It is a lot of planning, but it shouldn't cost you anything.
I think it is more practical to have a J&J as opposed to a shower.
Bob and I lived together for 3 years and were pretty much established.
So it was more practical for us to have money rather than duplicate
toasters, etc.
TB
|
694.2 | Tacky, if you ask me! | EXPRES::SECRETARY | | Tue Jul 11 1989 12:57 | 21 |
| I personally feel that Jack & Jill showers are tacky and that to
request one is even tackier. There is no doubt that weddings are
expensive but from day one of a marriage, you should not try to live
beyond your means. Having a "fundraiser" in order to have a more
expensive wedding or expecting others to sell tickets to help furnish
your first apartment is not what I consider "getting off to a good
start".
I know that when I'm approached for one of these events, I feel
uncomfortable because this to me, is just one more thing I'll have
dish out money on. Attending weddings has become expensive to
the guests. A family member of mine recently got married and I was
expected to attend 3 showers, 1 jack and jill, the wedding and not to
mention the purchase of evening clothes to attend a black tie wedding.
This cousin's wedding costed me over $400.
I think Jack & Jill's should be banned!
Debra
|
694.3 | Some ideas | JENEVR::POIRIER | Be a Voice for Choice! | Tue Jul 11 1989 13:01 | 43 |
| Two things - Personally I think Jack & Jills are a lot more fun than
the traditional "ladies only" bridal showers. The "groom" is getting
married too - and any gifts are really for him too!
Secondly there are many ways to do a Jack & Jill that won't ruin you
financially. I just went to one last weekend that was a lot of fun-
Tickets were $5, it was at a hall with a DJ and everyone bought a small
gift. Any extra money was given to the couple Other ideas:
1) Luau/outdoor barbecue/Beach party! (pool party if the pool is available!)
Themes for the shower gifts could be outdoorsie stuff.
2) Wine and Cheese tasting party - ask each guest to bring two bottles
of their favorite wine, one bottle wrapped for the couple and one
bottle for the party. This type of party would be best planned around
the cocktail hour. Food may include cheese, appetizers, fruits,
crackers and breads (shouldn't be a real big expense - you just want
your guests to be able to clean the palette between tastings). Before
each wine is tasted, ask the guest who brought the bottle to offer a
toast to the couple. Other gifts if guests don't want to bring wine:
barware, champagne/wine glasses, champagne bucket, wine rack, carafe
etc.
3) What's wrong with a morning brunch for both the men & women?
4) If everyone in the families don't know each other real well, have a
"Meet the family shower!" One of my cousins had one and it was lots of
fun. Everyone had to have a name tag with their relationship to either
the bride or groom and their name on it. They had old family pictures,
movies, baby pictures of the bride and groom, scrapbooks, highschool
yearbooks, memory albums, newspaper clippings or the bride and groom as
well as some of the other members in each family. The movies were run
off to the side and were really funny. Pictures were posted on the
walls. They only received two gifts, one was a copy of their family
tree, the other was a enlarged photograph of their engagement picture
with all of their friends signatures on the matted frame. Later they
played some taped music for dancing.
Hope these ideas help.
Suzanne
|
694.4 | Gag me! | CIMBAD::WALTON | | Tue Jul 11 1989 14:01 | 23 |
|
AAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH!
Another cash oriented party for a bride and groom!
I have been to several Jack and Jill's and they were all worst than
the others!
The last person suggested some *LOVELY* ideas for "showers" to include
the groom. J&J's are just about as tacky as money tree's and dollar
dances! I would also suggest that someone ask the bride what she
might like to do. SHe might like something totally different!
Sue
|
694.5 | | LACV01::BOISVERT | | Tue Jul 11 1989 14:06 | 16 |
| re: .2
I stated in .1 that people rather have a Jack & Jill *INSTEAD* of
a shower/bachelor party, etc. because they are all ready established.
I didn't ask anyone to help establish our new home. I didn't want to
get gifts for my home. I had a home for three years, so I thought it was
a waste to have a wedding shower. My sister thought it would be
great to have a J&J.
I had a great time at my J&J and everyone else did too.
I think it's pretty TACKY that relatives and friends think that
the bride and groom are asking them to be financially burdened.
TB
|
694.6 | | AKOV13::MACDOWELL | | Tue Jul 11 1989 14:21 | 17 |
| "100+ people"--for a shower--that sounds more like a wedding to
me! I had always thought showers were for the "closest"family and
friends, not the entire wedding guest list. If what you're brother's
suggesting is that he wants to be included in the shower, that's
one thing, but asking you to throw a large party is another, and
to agree with a few notes back, "tacky". If the issue is whether
or not to include men with the shower, there are pros and cons that
can be easily sorted out..but it sounds like this is a bigger issue
than that.
On another point, I had always thought that showers were to be thrown
by someone other than a family member, because the families already
have so many expenses...
Good luck.
Susan
|
694.7 | coed showers without the $$$$??? | WMOIS::B_REINKE | If you are a dreamer, come in.. | Tue Jul 11 1989 14:36 | 6 |
| To me a "Jack and Jill" implies buying a ticket or otherwise
contributing money to the engaged couple. Is this the common
understanding of what that means? People can have 'coed' showers
without it being a 'Jack and Jill'.
Bonnie
|
694.8 | | AKOV12::GIUNTA | | Tue Jul 11 1989 14:37 | 21 |
| We had a Jack and Jill shower when we got married, but I have never
heard of selling tickets to the event. It's the same thing as a
shower for just the women where they are expected to bring gifts,
so I don't understand why people think that it is more tasteless to
have the Jack and Jill. At our shower, we held it at a hall with
a band and a sit-down dinner, but then that's what we normally do
in my family for showers (and we had about 160 people at the shower).
None of us have ever liked the women-only at somebody's house routine.
That way, it was more like a big party, and both the men and women
got to have fun. I figure that the groom is also getting married,
so he should be able to take part in all the festivities.
And we went by the Italian (Rhode Island Italian, that is) custom
where both shower and wedding gifts are cash. The tradition goes
back to the days when no one could afford a wedding, so the gift
is basically to cover the plate for the shower, and to cover the
plate plus a little for the gift for the wedding. And my parents
paid for our shower. I did not expect any of my maids to give a
shower.
|
694.9 | pointer | LEZAH::BOBBITT | invictus maneo | Tue Jul 11 1989 14:41 | 6 |
| There is a topic in Womannotes version 1 that discusses this, it's
699: Coed Showers - Your opinion
-Jody
|
694.10 | Jack & Jills vary | JENEVR::POIRIER | Be a Voice for Choice! | Tue Jul 11 1989 14:48 | 24 |
| RE: 7
I think it depends on where you live - the definition varies. I've
always considered a Jack & Jill to be a shower that includes the men
as well as the women. In certain areas/families, money giving is more
common and accepted than in others.
Personally a shower for "ladies" which includes watching the bride open
umpteen gifts is boring and I don't like attending them. Unforunately
I didn't let my maid of honor and my mother know that and that was
exactly what they gave me. I would have muched prefered something a
little different that included my fiance and his friends. So it is
wise to ask both the bride and groom what they would prefer.
I did go to one Jack & Jill which was really funny - the women had to
buy gifts for the groom and the men had to buy gifts for the bride.
Now watching them open these gifts was entertaining!
Suzanne
P.S. Tacky is telling other people that their customs for weddings and
showers is tacky!
|
694.11 | | ORIENT::SECRETARY | | Tue Jul 11 1989 14:50 | 12 |
| I agree that Jack & Jill showers are different from co-ed showers.
I think co-ed showers are great and should be encouraged.
Proper etiquette does say that showers, etc. should not be
given by immediate family. On the other hand, if a bride and
groom are already established because of their living arrangements
prior to the wedding, then only a wedding gift is necessary. Showers
for couples established in a home are in poor taste in my book.
Debra
|
694.12 | | VALKYR::RUST | | Tue Jul 11 1989 15:21 | 28 |
| Ya learn somethin' new every day, I guess... Here I'd always thought
"Jack and Jill" was a cutesy term for a co-ed shower, and had NEVER
heard of such a thing as buying tickets to a party prior to the wedding.
I suppose it could be a lot of fun, but I would have thought that if
you're already planning a large-ish wedding and/or reception, adding a
pre-wedding party for 100+ people seems like overkill. (But then, I
think that 20 people makes a large party, so I'm not exactly heavily
into socializing on a grand scale!)
I'm not wildly fond of the idea of parties specifically for the purpose
of getting cash gifts, but that's personal prejudice. (I don't like
money trees either.) But if it's an acceptable form of entertainment
within your social group, why not go for it?
My basic theory: It is (or should be) an honor to be asked to undertake
part of the responsibility for wedding-related activities - but if I
were asked to do something that would take more time or money than I
thought I could manage (or which exceeded my "tackiness" quota!), I
would decline the honor with thanks. (Or, of course, suggest simpler
alternatives that I thought I could handle, and see if that was
acceptable to whoever was doing the asking.)
It is kind of funny how wild people can get over these differences in
family traditions. Republican and Democrat can marry and live happily
ever after, but those who open Christmas presents on Christmas Eve
should never marry into a Christmas-morning family...
-b
|
694.13 | jack and jills.... | BARTLE::LESSARD | | Tue Jul 11 1989 15:34 | 44 |
|
As the orginator of the note, I guess I should explain
for other's in the U.S. and elsewhere, Jack and Jill
means a lot of things, some of which have been mentioned
here. I never heard of it myself (I grew up in Maynard)
til a friend of mine from Fitchburg mentioned it was
a tradition in that area. It can mean buying tickets,
throwing a "couples shower", and can be in an ethnic
tradition.
A lot of ideas here are great - I think
the only one I have a problem with is selling tickets -
I would feel weird sending invitations to people
and asking for money. (That just my preference, I know
people that have had a great time at some, and they
can be done in good taste).
Just some things I wanted to stress about this particular
situation:
My brother is requesting this, not his fiance.
Her family is New York and only her mother will
be attending - the rest of her friends are so
scattered that I imagine we will only meet them
at the wedding.
It's my BROTHERS friends that live in the area and
he wants to attend - he seems to be concerned about
having a bash and having fun with his friends. I am
feeling this event should be something for HER and
with the geography problems, a quiet event is in order.
My problem is my brother wants to be the center of
attention - so I wanted to avoid a couples event
where he is star of the day.
He caused "problems" at my shower and my sisters. I
won't even go into it, but this may clarify my dilemna....
Thanks for the suggestions so far!.
|
694.16 | some thoughts | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | Purple power! | Tue Jul 11 1989 16:25 | 21 |
| hi,
it sounds to me like you're really not interested in having a shower
that your brother attends and that you're somewhat offended that
he'd try to tell you what kind of shower to give. it also sounds
like you have some big concerns about what will happen if there
are men at the shower.
i liked the idea of talking to your future sister-in-law to ask what
_she_ wants. also, i wonder what would happen if you didn't serve
alcohol (i may have gotten the mistaken impression that that's been a
problem at past events). maybe your brother's best man could throw him
a bachelor's party somewhere so that he can be a star and hang out with
his friends. one last suggestion: i went to one shower (where, btw, we
gave _very_ inexpensive presents) where the groom showed up for about
15 minutes at the end -- he dutifully admired all the presents, we
embarrassed him unmercifully in a cute way, and then we disbanded...
hope this helps... and i hope that you and your mother find a good
solution that includes what _you_ feel comfortable with.
liz
|
694.17 | a suggestion | AKOV12::GIUNTA | | Tue Jul 11 1989 16:28 | 26 |
| I have a suggestion. Since it is your brother who is interested
in the party, and since he seems to want it for his friends to have
a good time, maybe you could have something with just that group
of people. When my brother-in-law Rick got married in Nashville, his
wife's family planned lots of events for the few days before the
wedding since all of Rick's family as well as the bridal party was
coming from out-of-state. The bride had already had several showers
(one in Nashville, one in Charleston, and one in Boston), yet none
of the groom's family was able to attend due to distance. So the
bride's sister planned a lingerie shower where the bridesmaids and
the groom's family was invited while the ushers and rest of the
men went out for a bachelor party. The shower was held at a
restaurant, and we all pitched in for our own food. After that,
the women met the men at a nightclub at a pre-arranged time for
dancing into the wee hours of the morning. The bride and groom
had also rented a hotel suite so that people could crash there instead
of going back to their hotels on the other side of town. Maybe
you could do something like this so that everyone would have a good
time (to satisfy your brother), and you could still have a shower
that is within your budget. You might also want to do it when some
of the out-of-town guests arrive if you think they should be included.
In my brother-in-law's case, all of the out-of-town folks were
either siblings, parents, grandparents, or members of the wedding
party, so there wasn't an unmanageable number of people.
|
694.18 | | JAIMES::LESSARD | | Tue Jul 11 1989 17:18 | 39 |
|
Liz you hit the booze problem right. That turned into
a problem at my sister's shower, and I would not want
the fiasco repeated - this was at my parents home, so
they could have been held responsible for the stupid
actions of others. Unfortunately, my sisters mother-in-law
insisted ALL people from her side of the family attend
this shower, which is why it swelled to 100+, which
when you think of it is coming close to having 2 weddings!
Those ideas are wonderful - I myself figured several
small showers to accomodate family and friends could
be arranged - i.e, for those in New York, friends
where they live in Maine, and one here. The brides
mother prefers the focus to be in this area, which
is why we, the groom's family, are getting TOO involved
for my taste. When my husbands brother married
in Virginia, we stayed a week and had several occasions
and events (with women only, men and women cocktail party, etc)
and it turned out to be fun, and we got to know the names
and faces.
However, this wedding is in Maine, and most people are planning
only a two night stay, making things tight. We will
be near Kennebunkport, which is expensive - many will
have to plan well ahead for the cost as it is. The bride
has met all of our family through parties and holidays
and the respective parents are scheduled to meet soon.
One thing our family here came up (today, yes we
are getting stressed out about this now) with is get a hall
from 3-7 in the late afternoon, with some hors'oevres
and buy your own drinks. After 7, everyone is on there
own... that could work!
I am really fascinated with the variety of traditions
and experiences people have written about here. I
hope to hear more!
|
694.19 | | ULTRA::ZURKO | Even in a dream, remember, ... | Wed Jul 12 1989 13:13 | 15 |
| I wanted a co-ed shower (I called 'em J&J, but that had nothing to do with
tickets). My mother could not live with inviting _her_ friends to one. So...
The 'traditional' shower started in the afternoon, in door, at my cousin's
house. The men who came 'early' (with their female SOs) hung out outside (with
a keg, though that sounds like a problem for you). We did the giving of
'female-type' gifts, punch, surprise male dancer, etc (there was a glass door
to the outside, and the guys really enjoyed 'peeking' in.) The J&J portion
started in the early evening, with plenty of time for mom's friends to retreat.
People who came then gave us gifts like gumby's, and we hung out and played
cards (the J&J crowd tended to be my friends).
I bet it required a lot of work, but it didn't seem to require too much money
(you can save by cutting out the male dancer, or getting a friend to stand in).
Mez
|
694.20 | FWIW | SPGOGO::HSCOTT | Lynn Hanley-Scott | Wed Jul 12 1989 14:55 | 27 |
| Reading this note has been a good lesson in Valuing Differences! It's
interesting to see the different perspectives and attitudes towards
J&Js/cash/coed showers.
Personally I find J&Js offensive because the seem to be an outright
request for cash.... but that's based on my experience with that type
of pre-wedding event.
Regarding your situation specifically, I really think that you and your
Mom (and siblings?) need to determine what (if anything) you feel
comfortable doing -- regardless of your brother's desires and desire to
be center of attention. Given your comment that only the mother of the
bride would be coming to a Maynard local event, why don't you consider
some of the ideas from earlier replies, such as a
meet-the-bride-and-mom cocktail hour and limit it to 2 hrs or so. I
also thought the idea of bringing wine and cheese for a party was nice,
and inexpensive.
Bottom line is that you and your Mom should not be pressured into
something costly nor something where you have to manage large groups of
unruly people.
And remember -- Miss Manners Etiquette: The rule of thumb is that the
MAID OF HONOR is responsible for coordinating the shower!
--Lynn
|
694.21 | We have a solution! | BARTLE::LESSARD | | Wed Jul 12 1989 15:30 | 49 |
|
I can't believe it, but we came upon a solution that
seems to fit:
Not putting my Mom through the nightmare of hosting
over 100 guests,
Not spending a lot of money;
Includes both men and women;
Is not TOO boring;
and will probably keep most people in "control".
We have decided to host a cocktail hour from 3-7 at
a local restaurant. They will provide us with a
bartender for $50, the lounge, and provide appetizers
at a reasonable price. They will also serve cake,
etc to the guests. People will be responsible for
their own drinks.
Since this is a restaurant, we figured most people
will be on their best behavior, and this solves
what we thought was a "potential problem" of
people getting out of hand.
Both sides of the wedding parties will attend and
at least we will have met them and the brides Mom
before the wedding. If people want to stay after 7 for
dinner, or stay for entertainment later in the evening,
the have the option of doing both if they wish.
I noted the mention of the maid of honor doing the planning -
Unfortunately, she is out of state and not familiar
about this area, so this is how we ended up with it.
We have talked with her on the phone, and she's sure
everyone will enjoy it.
I think this is going to work out well! I hope
people still reply about their experiences - there
have been some great ideas mentioned.
|
694.22 | SOUTHERN STYLE | WFOV12::LITEROVICH | | Tue Jul 25 1989 08:57 | 12 |
| When I married the first time down south, I had a traditional southern
wedding with a twist of New England (as my Mother is from Mass,
ironic I should end up here).
Two nights before the wedding we had a casual barbeque/pool party
at a freinds house. This was my first experience of "Jack & Jill"
party. We were not expecting gifts, we planned this as a way for
all the families and friends to meet in a relaxed atmosphere. It
was great. However, being from a Southern Baptist area, the liquer
was very limited.
Kim
|
694.23 | Why not have a simple family picnic shower? | RAIN::WATSON | | Tue Aug 08 1989 13:47 | 21 |
| When my husband and I were married, we had what I refer to as a
Jack and Jill...it was held in a hall, my parents and relatives
did the cooking. Men and women were invited (family and very close
neighbors only). The entire wedding guestlist was NOT invited.
We had a GREAT time! Even my husband enjoyed it. Unlike the
previous replies, our shower was not the type where tickets are
sold. I'd find that kind to be extremely in poor taste.
I specifically asked for that type of shower (actually, I just wanted
a simple family picnic). I don't think that it was wrong to ask
either. One of the responsiblities of the maid of honor, is to
plan a shower. Sorry, but it is quite expensive to be a member
of a wedding party.
Personally, I hate all-women showers. I find them to be very boring,
and I try to avoid them if at all possible. I also decline to attend
most showers if the couple is living together already, or if it's
a second marriage. At that point, the primary thing they need is
money, which I do not give at showers.
Robin
|
694.24 | | HPSCAD::TWEXLER | | Tue Aug 08 1989 15:36 | 28 |
|
>" I also decline to attend
> most showers if the couple is living together already, or if it's
> a second marriage. At that point, the primary thing they need is
> money, which I do not give at showers.
>
> Robin"
Fascinating. The people I know who are getting married are in their early
to mid-twenties, do live together and many are in or just starting to get
over the stage of 2 knives, 2 forks, two towels in their household. If
people were inclined to give these people any gifts, sets of towels and
all that setting up stuff is precisely what they would need and like!
--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*
About the shower business in general...
I've never *heard* of inviting guests to pay for a shower by buying
tickets!!! And, I'm from western Massachusetts, originally. A jack and
jill shower to me is just a co-ed shower.
To me the big showers that people are having with more than 100 people in
attendance are not showers at all but engagement parties. My understanding
of the difference is based on size. For a shower you might have 15 people
who you are close to while for an engagement party you might have 30-200.
Tamar
|
694.25 | Busy Bride to be | COMET::HULTENGREN | | Tue Aug 15 1989 14:20 | 58 |
| I am 30 years old and a vet of two divorce(one marrage was a common
law). I quite by accident met a man with whom I was willing to try
one more time. It is his first and we agree our last marrage.
I wanted to elope. I mean why waste the money, right. Well he wanted a
formal wedding with all six of his brothers and sisters there. And he
wanted all of his brothers as groomsmen(four of them). He has another
good friend as a bestman.
I tried for weeks to talk him around, but this was very important to
him. SO the wedding is Sept 16 and there are going to be 200
invitations sent. Many are out of town and probally wont arrive.
The point is that with me living week to week supporting my children
and with his "bachlor habits"there are many things that we have not
been able to replace as they have worn out. Towel and sheets being
on that list.
One of my friends gave a lingere party for me and it was a lot of fun.
Another is planning a Tupperware party/shower that will go on while
the men and children are in the (large, heated suitablly furnished)
garage having a party of their own.
I have never heard of a jack and jill party. I agreed to the Tupperware
party as it was an easy way of letting people know some of the things
we want/need. I have had some opinions expressed to me and the ladies
that have volenteered to host the parties about having a Sales oriented
shower and my imediate feeling is where were they when we started
brainstorming about is 3 months ago. The party is being co-planned and
one of the planners is adamant about keeping the integrety of a
"Bridal shower" whatever that means. I just felt that if we were only
going to do this once and we are choosing to take the trouble of
planning this celebration. It would be fun to have some bridal
showers and silly stuff like that. I also thought a product that
I cant get enough of would be easy to plan and make gift giving
easier. Lingere and Tupperware fit that catagory. They also offered a
variety of low cost idems that I need/want that it would make it easier
for some of my friends to afford to participate. I would't mind if they
didnt get me a present but I have been asked so many times "Well what
do you need?" That I thought this was a simple solution.
I do have a hard time getting money as a gift. As much a I truely
appriciate it I have a hard time figuring out how to express my
thanks appropriatly in the Thank you card.
Question:Do people who have the 200 plus "jack and jill" partys send
out thank yous?
janet
P.S. I am sending out invites for the wedding to include the familys of
our friends and relative so we are expecting 100 to 150 men, women and
children to show.
|
694.26 | | ULTRA::ZURKO | Even in a dream, remember, ... | Tue Aug 15 1989 14:54 | 8 |
| On Thank You cards for cash:
I tell 'em what I'm going to spend it on. After the wedding there were
honeymoon bills, which it went towards (in spirit, if in fact I did not make
sure the exact dollar bills went to pay them off).
Food is nice too :-). I wouldn't mind being thanked for a tenderloin dinner.
Mez
|
694.27 | I just wrote one note | AKOV12::GIUNTA | | Tue Aug 15 1989 15:42 | 9 |
| I had one of those large double showers with about 160 people. It was
held about a month before the wedding, and all gifts for both the
shower and the wedding were cash with the exception of 3 gifts (The RI
Italian custom is cash for weddings and wakes). When it came to
thank-you notes, I wrote one note to cover both the shower and the
wedding gift since both events were so close. I don't know if that's
proper etiquette or not, but it seemed to suit the purpose.
Cathy
|
694.28 | more shower nonsense | BARTLE::LESSARD | | Tue Aug 15 1989 17:03 | 35 |
|
The shower I started this whole note about is
taking place this weekend. I hope to God never
to have plan a long distance Jack and Jill/Couples
(or whatever you want to call it) again.
I think I have come to some conclusions about showers.
My personal opinion is the wedding party should
make a decision of what is affordable for
a party, what logistics are involved and number
of people that can reasonably invited.
I think people and the wedding couples lately are
expecting a shower to become a FORM OF ENTERTAINMENT.
And I figured that's where the problem is. It's
not a nightclub, a drunken blowout cookout, a
luau, a beach party. It's a shower for the bride
to get household items to start up a home. I
figure if women cannot go, talk with their girlfiends
and aunts and cousins and have a few drinks and
bite to eat without getting bands, DJ's and halls
involved, too bad.
Two years ago, I managed to be the bride at an all
women's shower, and it was just fine. I managed to
wait til my wedding day to have the 150 people
join me in a party then.
I feel much better now. I will post a note about how
it goes.
PS - Can I just say again "I AM NOT THE MAID OF HONOR"!
I GOT STUCK WITH IT CAUSE SHE"S OUT OF STATE. OK?
|
694.29 | | BRONS::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Sun Sep 10 1989 19:32 | 6 |
| The nonsense here seems to me to be oriented around money and no
around having two sexes at a shower. The latter makes sense to
me. Concentration on the former makes me remember how much a
native of the 60's forced to live in the 80's I feel like.
JimB.
|
694.30 | | ICESK8::KLEINBERGER | It BE hard | Sun Sep 10 1989 21:55 | 10 |
| I had a Jack and Jill shower for a member of this community at my
house a couple of years back. He knew about it, she didn't. We mainly
sat around, even played those dumb games that the party stores sell...
opened gifts, and generally had a very good time. I had made a cake for
them both, and we had the usual cheese/crackers/chips to help the games
along. I told everyone coming if they wanted alcohol to bring it, and
the whole evening worked out well.. if you need some suggestions,
please feel free to send me mail at the above node.
Gale
|
694.31 | a fiasco | BARTLE::LESSARD | | Mon Oct 09 1989 14:58 | 35 |
|
Well, here's how the shower went:
Our chosen place and ideas for the party turned out great. The shower
itself was sucessful, and it seemed to please all. As I had
mentioned in previous notes, alcohol, for some relatives was a
problem, and this turned out to be the case when people
were invited back to my parents. As a result, several persons
are not attending the wedding. (ie not invited for lack
of control, for fear they will ruin the wedding - bride and
grooms decision)
What a hard thing this was for my family. This problem would
have happened at the next event or holiday, of that I am
positive. One blessing is we can relax somewhat and attend
the wedding not worrying about the behavior of others.
If anyone sees this notes and recognizes a similar problem
among family or friends, follow your good sense and plan
the event the way you think it will work best. We learned
the hard way, that for sure!
|
694.32 | Don't have a bar | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Tue Oct 10 1989 15:17 | 8 |
| One way to deal with people who can't handle alcohol is not to
serve it. For several reasons, we won't have a bar at our wedding
(We're still trying to decide whether we will have a champagne
toast, I expect that we will.) Not having a bar cuts the costs
considerably, and deals simply with people who might drink too
much.
--David
|
694.33 | Not always a workable choice... | JAIMES::LESSARD | | Thu Oct 12 1989 10:35 | 21 |
|
One problem with not serving drinks, is that you are not
always the one with the choice. In our case, the brides
family is hosting the wedding. Why should they be asked
to do this because of 2 people from our family who can't behave?
Eliminating these 2 as guests was an easier solution.
Cost is not a factor, as people pay for their own drinks.
These people have caused trouble at other holidays, so
they had their chance, blew it, and will have to get
their act together before they will be invited to any
family gathering. It's sad, but no one will put up
the fear of another rined eveent.
|