T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
643.1 | a few times was enough for me | ULTRA::ZURKO | mud-luscious and puddle-wonderful | Tue Jun 13 1989 12:47 | 3 |
| I've been to lower-grade ones a long time ago. So I wouldn't, cause I've seen
it before, and Joe looks better. To me :-).
Mez
|
643.2 | it all seems so un-human | SELL3::JOHNSTON | weaving my dreams | Tue Jun 13 1989 12:53 | 19 |
| Would I go?
Not for the show, certainly. Possibly for the company of friends
who were determined to spend an evening there. [much as I would
go to a seafood restaurant with friends even though I'm quite allergic]
I can't imagine wanting to go. It seems rather exploitive. It
also brings out a side of audiences I'd rather not look at. Yes,
I have been to a similar place and didn't enjoy the experience.
Oh sure. The 'scenery' was pleasant. I just found the slavering
off-putting.
I guess my bottom line is that I don't like seeing _anyone_
objectified in this manner -- men, women, children. If someone
chooses to earn a living or seek entertainment from such, fine.
It's just not for me.
Ann
|
643.3 | why waste an otherwise useful evening? | ODIHAM::PHILPOTT_I | Col. Philpott is back in action... | Tue Jun 13 1989 13:08 | 14 |
|
re .0� Would you go to the Chippendales' night club in LA or NYC?
W5H? (who, why, what, where, when & how?)
[From the context of previous replies do I correctly deduce that
this place is a "male strip club" or similar?]
If so the answer is sure I'd go, but only if they'd let me take
pictures :-)
/. Ian .\
|
643.4 | | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | the other side of the mirror | Tue Jun 13 1989 14:08 | 17 |
| I might go with women friends just for a laugh, and to get together.
But I don't particularly enjoy this type of thing. I went to The
Golden Banana, in Peabody, MA, several years ago. It did seem sort
of pitiful to me the way some of the women got so excited over it.
It seems like a poor substitute for a real date or relationship
or sex to me.
What bothers me most about strippers is that no matter whether it's
men stripping and women watching, or women stripping and men watching,
I always get the feeling that the women are being exploited by the
men. When women strip, and men watch, I always feel that the men
are exploiting the women by paying to watch them. But, then when
men strip, and women watch, I feel that the men are exploiting the
women by getting them to pay to watch them.
Lorna
|
643.5 | but please don't call them 'men' | SPMFG1::CHARBONND | I'm the NRA | Tue Jun 13 1989 14:17 | 3 |
| re.4 I must disagree - in both cases it's some mercenary
type exploiting men and women both. Sadly, most of these
lizards are male.
|
643.6 | | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | the other side of the mirror | Tue Jun 13 1989 14:35 | 5 |
| Re .5, you may be right. I was just saying how these situations
make me *feel.*
Lorna
|
643.7 | | ICESK8::KLEINBERGER | Welcome to *my* fantasy... | Tue Jun 13 1989 15:19 | 5 |
| RE: .5
I don't know, the Chippendales I have seen, are all male :-), which
certainly makes them men....
:-)
|
643.8 | | 2EASY::PIKET | It Might As Well Be Spring | Tue Jun 13 1989 17:26 | 12 |
|
I think if I went to that place I'd react much the way I did when
I visited Provincetown a few weeks ago:
"Water everywhere and not a drop to drink"
Seriously, I think it would be a silly thing to do. Do some women
actually find it possible to oggle some posturing egomaniac they've
never met?
Roberta
|
643.9 | | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | the other side of the mirror | Tue Jun 13 1989 17:54 | 5 |
| Re .8, I know, it's bad enough oggling the posturing egomaniacs I
have met.
Lorna
|
643.10 | like a painting? | WMOIS::B_REINKE | If you are a dreamer, come in.. | Tue Jun 13 1989 18:59 | 6 |
| in re .8
Well I saw them on Donovan about 6 years ago and found them
visually quite, um, asthetic?
Bonnie
|
643.11 | Once was more than enough... | LAGUNA::RACINE_CH | | Tue Jun 13 1989 20:51 | 20 |
|
I went to the Chippendales club in L.A. a little more than a year
ago. It's built up to be much more than it really is, and I
was relieved to see that. The men stripped down to g-strings
which left little to the imagination, but at least they had
something on. They were quite nice looking, masterful teasers,
but the thing I enjoyed most was watching other womens reactions
to the Chippendales' dancing. One thing I didn't enjoy was when
the show was over they opened the doors to men (men aren't allowed
during the show), the guys that came in seemed to think that every
woman in the place was ready to be picked up and carried off!
I went out of curiosity (and because we had some friends visiting
from back east and that seemed to be THE THING to do in L.A.!) but
I wouldn't spend the money to see it again. It was a fun night
out, but I'd much rather just go to dinner and out dancing somewhere.
My two cents worth,
Cherie
|
643.12 | Guess I've had a sheltered life | SYSENG::BITTLE | Nancy Bittle-Hardware Engineer,LSEE | Wed Jun 14 1989 05:16 | 6 |
|
And I thought Chippendales were Walt Disney World characters!
nancy b.
|
643.13 | Roberta- you never disappoint me :-) | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | Sad Wings of Destiny | Wed Jun 14 1989 09:52 | 14 |
| > Seriously, I think it would be a silly thing to do. Do some women
> actually find it possible to oggle some posturing egomaniac they've
> never met?
I'm sure that some women do, as they seem to be making enough money to
further their existence.
Are female strippers also "posturing egomaniacs," or just male ones?
When you see a really hot jazz musician, do you say to yourself "She's
just showing off," or do you try to appreciate her for her talents?
I think a similar thing happens with strippers (of both sexes).
The Doctah
|
643.14 | | 2EASY::PIKET | It Might As Well Be Spring | Wed Jun 14 1989 10:05 | 25 |
|
>> Seriously, I think it would be a silly thing to do. Do some women
>> actually find it possible to oggle some posturing egomaniac they've
>> never met?
>
> I'm sure that some women do, as they seem to be making enough money to
> further their existence.
Doc, does the phrase "RHETORICAL QUESTION" mean anything to you?
>When you see a really hot jazz musician, do you say to yourself "She's
>just showing off," or do you try to appreciate her for her talents?
>I think a similar thing happens with strippers (of both sexes).
I am not even going to dignify this ridiculous analogy between ART
and sexual exploitation with a response.
Roberta
|
643.15 | | SA1794::CHARBONND | I'm the NRA | Wed Jun 14 1989 10:18 | 10 |
| re.10 While they may be 'visually quite, um, aesthetic' that's
not what they're selling.
For visual attraction I'd rather watch bodybuilders. They *are*
posing for aesthetic reasons.
Dana
(I must admit that some of the posing routines these days are
a bit overdone)
|
643.16 | Chippendale....a furniture period, right? | LEZAH::BOBBITT | the closer I am to fine | Wed Jun 14 1989 10:29 | 9 |
| I'd toy with the idea....but I don't think I could justify the cost
to myself. I have, in the past, bought Chippendales posters, though.
Good, clean, long-term dream-fodder there....
I'd rather see a male dancer (jazz, ballet, you get the idea) than
a male stripper....
-Jody
|
643.17 | Forget it! | MAMTS1::TTAYLOR | | Wed Jun 14 1989 10:49 | 17 |
| ROTTEN ATTITUDE, PERHAPS, BUT IF YOU'VE SEEM 'EM NAKED ONCE, YOU'VE
SEEM 'EM ALL IN MY BOOK!
IT JUST SEEMS SORT OF ANIMALISTIC TO ME. I THOUGHT WOMEN WERE ABOVE
ALL THAT SORT OF THING (UNLIKE SOME MEN WHO FREQUENT STRIP JOINTS!).
IF YOU CAN GET YOUR SWEETHEART/HUSBAND/SO TO STRIP AT HOME, WHY
BOTHER????
MY FRIENDS HAVE TOLD ME HOW WILD THOSE THINGS WERE, AND FRANKLY,
I DON'T THINK IT'S MY IDEA OF SUCH A GREAT TIME.
TAMMI
|
643.18 | aesthetically speaking of men :-) | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | the other side of the mirror | Wed Jun 14 1989 10:54 | 33 |
| Re .10, .16, (Bonnie & Jody) well, when I want to look at men for
aesthetic reasons I usually go to a rock concert: :-)
Jon Bon Jovi (the hair, the smile, the cute little body in the skin
tight pants)
Simon LeBon (Duran Duran) (I once saw him very close-up in person
and, well, he took my breath away :-),
gorgeous body and face, great dancer,
he's the best looking man I've ever seen
in person, his photos or videos do not
do him justice)
George Michael - (hair, face, body, clothes, smile, the way he moves,
talk about aesthetic perfection in a human body)
Bruce Springsteen - (my all-time favorite sex object, great body,
great stage personality, and he's *my age*!
i'd rather see Bruce's cute little body in
jeans and a t-shirt than any other man naked
:-) )
Or....
I could just go and see the new Indiana Jones movie for the third
time. The best part of all those movies is just *looking* at Harrison
Ford. He has great shoulders and a jaw line that is aesthetically
unbelievable! *sigh*
Well, I'd better calm down....
Lorna
|
643.19 | | ASABET::K_HAMILTON | Karen Hamilton - Activist! | Wed Jun 14 1989 10:57 | 28 |
| I went in Hawaii with a group of friends. We had a good time.
I'd been to the Golden Banana once and there's no comparison. The
Banana was VERY smoky, noisy, crowded. It was a strip joint, but
it billed itself as a strip joint, so there's no complaint. I think
the fun is going with a crowd. The MC had a field day joking about
the school bus in the parking lot -- most of the group were jr.
high teachers. I can't imagine going there again, but I'm glad
I went once.
Chippendales had a whole different atmosphere. It was a nice
nightclub, there was room between the tables for waiters to get
through, you could get a drink without waiting a half hour. The
customers dressed as if they were going out for a nice evening. The
Chips bill themselves as dancers, and they are good dancers. The
acts are well choreographed and well presented.
Yes, some of the women acted like fools, but they paid their money
- and who'se to say they don't act as foolish when they go out for
an evening anywhere. I can't say how anyone behaved after the show
because we did stay.
Yes, Ian, you can bring your camera. Almost everyone there that
night had one.
|
643.20 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | Sad Wings of Destiny | Wed Jun 14 1989 11:23 | 15 |
| re .18
Lorna-
You have proved that it is possible to talk about the aesthetic value
of <men> in the paradigm of physical beauty without being inherently
exploitive. You basically dissected each man on your list, and talked
about parts of them without referring to their basic humanity or worth
as a person. _There is nothing basically wrong or exploitive about
this._
I just thought I'd mention it since some people seem to think there is
something wrong about talking about people's physical makeup.
The Doctah
|
643.21 | | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | the other side of the mirror | Wed Jun 14 1989 11:55 | 16 |
| re .20, except I really do care about the humanity of each of the
men on my list, and I do appreciate them all as people, especially
Bruce Springsteen whose music has brought me a lot of happiness.
None of these men is just "another pretty face" to me. I consider
them all to be very talented, and I think Bruce has a lot of
interesting thoughts to share with the world. I really don't think
I did separate my appreciation of their looks from their humanity.
I think I kept it in mind, and I think that the way each of them
expresses his humanity (while performing, especially Bruce's
conversations with his audience, the humour and humanness that Harrison
Ford brings to his roles, and the obvious love that Jon Bon Jovi
feels for his fans) has played a part in my finding them attractive.
Lorna
|
643.22 | | ODIHAM::PHILPOTT_I | Col. Philpott is back in action... | Wed Jun 14 1989 12:01 | 9 |
|
I sort of entered the comment about photography as a joke, but not
entirely.
In my limited experience of nightclubs, those that permit private
photography tend to offer an artistic show. Those that don't typically
are closer to the 'clip joint' scenario.
/. Ian .\
|
643.23 | :-) | WMOIS::B_REINKE | If you are a dreamer, come in.. | Wed Jun 14 1989 12:25 | 6 |
| in re .18
As far as Harrison Ford is concerned I'm with you Lorna, I've thought
he was gorgeous ever since the first Star Wars movie!
Bonnie
|
643.24 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | Sad Wings of Destiny | Wed Jun 14 1989 12:51 | 8 |
| >I really don't think
> I did separate my appreciation of their looks from their humanity.
But all you wrote about was their physical traits. I didn't see "..he's
a wonderful human being with nice buns." Men do this sort of thing, and
we get creamed. But then, that's different, isn't it?
|
643.25 | Not for me! | DASXPS::SLADE | | Wed Jun 14 1989 13:01 | 15 |
|
I went to a show a long time ago and to tell you the truth that
was enough for me. I think (just my own opinion) that Men or
Women stripping is very demeaning. I think women strippers
are bit more rude as far I have heard of what thier little
acts consist of, (EX: Blue Moon). What I hear about men stripping
and that time I went was mostly just dancing and the G-String
stayed ON, but I'm sure they can get just as rude. I just find it
very sad that some people enjoy watching others do something so
belittling.
Zina
|
643.26 | | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | the other side of the mirror | Wed Jun 14 1989 13:12 | 31 |
| RE .24, well, I'll try to explain how I think it's different. I
don't know if I can. *sigh*
Anyway, when I see businessmen or engineers (some SHR employees
may be familiar with Pudgy's special little lunches) at a strip show
watching anonymous women strip and dance, or I see construction
workers whistling at some woman they don't know and don't really
want to know, or I hear men talking about some secretary's or assembly
works ass, etc., or I hear men talking about women in Playboy or
Hustler, etc., I get the feeling that these men consider themselves
to be *above* the women. I get the impression the men think they
are better than these women, and that they would not want their
wife, or their sister, or their daughter to be one of these women.
I get the impression that men think these women are some group
of sub-humans put on earth for the men's mindless, emotionless,
pleasure.
But, I don't think I'm *better* than the rock stars I admire, or
the actors I think are attractive. I respect them as talented
individuals, and in most cases I know a little bit about them as
people, and I certainly know their names. In most cases they are
people I would be proud to have as friends or relatives. They are
not sluts that I look down on, and wouldn't want my friends or business
associates to know about. Do you see what I'm saying? So, I don't
think my admiring these famous men, partly for their looks, is really
the same as exploiting nameless, anonymous, people for their sexuality.
These men are not desperate or starving, forced to expose their
bodies to strangers for some money.
Lorna
|
643.27 | | DRACMA::GOLDSTEIN | Looking for that open door | Wed Jun 14 1989 14:16 | 37 |
| I recently went to the "Men in Motion" show at the Palace in Saugus,
MA. Not ever having seen male strippers, I had no idea what to expect,
but I must say it really was done in a tame manner. The
men were attractive and for the most part, very good dancers. And
none of us really found the show to be very erotic (or maybe we've
all died and just haven't found out yet :-) !).
To me, it seemed that everyone was really just there to have fun
and no one really seemed to take any of it seriously. Sort of like
a "lets play make-believe" thing, with the men trying to act out
some romantic fantasy...sort of like watching a music video that you would
see on MTV (except, of course, they ended up wearing only their
G-strings). It was kind of like everyone was acting a part...the
audience included.
It was interesting to note that, for the most part, the audience
is not allowed to touch the strippers. Money is collected by someone
who just follows the stripper as he travels through the audience.
The really strange part for me is when the stripper does get off
the stage, women start waving dollar bills, and the stripper goes
and kisses each one waving a dollar bill. But a *huge* part of the
audience (which was all female, BTW), seemed to enjoy that immensely.
I personally would rather kiss someone I know.
Anyway, IMHO, I think I would go again, just for laughs and to see some
good dancing, but it's not something I would be motivated to do
often. I think I'd just get bored.
Joan G.
Joan G.
|
643.28 | Don't knock it until you've tried it... | ICESK8::KLEINBERGER | Welcome to *my* fantasy... | Wed Jun 14 1989 19:11 | 20 |
| Well, I'd go again...
erotic there are not... good clean entertainment they are...
The music was EXTRMEMLY well chorographed... these men WERE body
builders - that was obvious - and I didn't see a single thing wrong
with the whole evening...
Police were there to keep any groupies under controlled, and no,
you weren't allowed to touch them, if you wanted to give them any
sort of tip it was handed to them, not placed anywhere around or
on there body...
... and a couple of them could lip sing better than some rock stars
could actually sing :-)
and -- make sure you check out the June 1990 portion of their 1990
calendar when it comes out.... it will be well worth your while
:-).. I can assure you!!!!!!
|
643.29 | | ACESMK::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Wed Jun 14 1989 21:02 | 18 |
| Re: .0
I probably wouldn't go unless I was in a really random mood. I'm not
terribly fond of poses and bodybuilders. Even if I were to do it for
the aesthetic experience, my tastes run to longer, leaner builds than
the average beefcake frequently exhibited.
Re: .14
No such thing as a rhetorical question in a public forum, I've noticed.
Re: .17
>I THOUGHT WOMEN WERE ABOVE ALL THAT SORT OF THING (UNLIKE SOME MEN WHO
>FREQUENT STRIP JOINTS!).
Nope; lascivious drooling is an equal opportunity reaction. Women are
just as base and vile as men, all in all.
|
643.30 | Admiration vs. exploitation | GEMVAX::KOTTLER | | Thu Jun 15 1989 09:20 | 6 |
| re .26
Well said Lorna! I think you make an important distinction and state
it very clearly.
Dorian
|
643.31 | Warning! Warning! Bozo Alert! | HANDY::MALLETT | Barking Spider Industries | Thu Jun 15 1989 12:07 | 9 |
| re: .29
� . . .lascivious drooling is an equal opportunity reaction. Women are
� just as base and vile as men, all in all.
A fact for which I'm eternally grateful.
Steve
|
643.32 | It's not for me | CSC32::L_CHUMBLEY | | Fri Jun 16 1989 15:14 | 8 |
| Nope, I wouldn't go.
I think I am a very liberal, open-minded individual, and far from being
prudish, but I have no desire to see a bunch of strange men bump and
grind. I would much rather see my SO bump and grind for *me*!!!
(then I get put the dollars where ever I want!! ;-) )
L.
|
643.33 | | VIDEO::MORRISSEY | Non-stop secret rendezvous | Mon Jun 19 1989 17:28 | 22 |
|
Well I've been to see Chippendales twice. Once in
Boston about 3 years ago and once in Lowell just recently.
Both times I had a great time. There were women there for
their 'bachelorette parties' and some there just for a ladies
night out etc. When I saw them in Boston you could walk up
to the stage hand them a dollar and get a kiss. But when I
saw them in Lowell supposedly the MA laws had changed or
something because you could not kiss the dancers. you could
hand them a dollar but the rest of your body had to stay
18" away or more from the dancer. (unless you were lucky
enough to be pulled up on stage)
It was not really wild. There were just a bunch of ladies out
to have a good time. The men were gorgeous, good dancers
and were there to entertain.
Would I go again? You bet!! Maybe for MY bachelorette party!
JJ
|
643.34 | As long as its fun... the sexuality takes a back seat. | DEMING::FOSTER | | Wed Jun 28 1989 13:54 | 29 |
| I haven't seen the Chippendales yet. They came to Worcester last
year and sold out before we could get our $20+ tickets.
But I have been to two other male strip acts, the first time alone,
the second time with my mom.
The first time was in a small intimate bar and the dancers got REAL
close, and one even started grinding on the floor with one of the
women. There was one extremely virile Italian guy who definitely
got my dollar, but all in all, it was a bit too "intimate" for me.
The second time, it was as much fun to watch the women's reactions
as it was to see the men. They each had an "act" in which they came
out in some costume based on a profession. And they stripped as
they danced as they strutted... the whole ambience was one of FUN.
A couple of guys had stuffed the g-string a bit un-naturally. (Yeah,
I DO notice these things!) But no g's came off. Unless you wanted
to pay $50 for a pose with him after the show.
I'd go again with a fun crowd, no prudes please. Its just another
form of entertainment, to me, not something I think any of us were
wetting our pants over. The first one was designed more along those
lines, and I have to admit, that's not something I aim to do in
public with strangers.
I think if you want a FUN experience, a show like Chippendales is
the thing to do. Then again, if you're cheap like me, just watch
Superman videos. I can assure you, I don't watch for the acting...
|
643.35 | | PIGGY::MCCALLION | | Sat Jul 15 1989 22:52 | 7 |
| I went to the Chippendale show in Worcester last year. The performance
was interesting. Would not go again.
A number of years ago, I went with a group of women to Fat Alberts
in Dudly, where the G-strings did come off. What surprised me was
the white haired ladies pushing the younger ones aside to get a
better view of the action on the stage.
|
643.36 | | TOOK::C_SANDSTROM | born of the stars | Tue Jul 18 1989 15:07 | 4 |
| Chippendales is coming to the Manchester/Portsmouth NH area soon.
Anyone know the schedule, location?
Conni
|