[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference turris::womannotes-v2

Title:ARCHIVE-- Topics of Interest to Women, Volume 2 --ARCHIVE
Notice:V2 is closed. TURRIS::WOMANNOTES-V5 is open.
Moderator:REGENT::BROOMHEAD
Created:Thu Jan 30 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 30 1995
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1105
Total number of notes:36379

610.0. "RUMORED RUMORS from The Globe" by DICKNS::STANLEY (What a long, strange trip its been) Fri May 19 1989 11:04

    Today's Boston Globe (page 25)
    
    RUMORED RUMORS
    	Rumors of layoffs have been circulating for several months at
    Digital Equipment Corp., where profits have started to fall off
    after several years of rapid growth.  Even in its worst down years,
    DEC has scrupulously avoided forced layoffs, putting into practice
    founder Ken Olsen's preaching that employees should not have to
    pay for managers' mistakes.  However, at a recent state-of-the-company
    review meeting, Olsen told his managers that if workers in the modern
    economy really want job security, "they should go work at the Post
    Office," a throwaway line that quickly made the rounds of the company's
    internal electronic mail system.
    
    	But a manager who heard Olsen's talk says he was not speaking
    about DEC, and in fact reiterated his commitment to guaranteed
    employment for Digital workers.  DEC executives are careful to point
    out that the company has a "tradition" - not a policy - of no layoffs,
    and is working hard to keep the tradition alive.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
610.1MEMORY::SLATERFri May 19 1989 11:3220
             <<< PEAR::PEAR_DATA$:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SOAPBOX.NOTE;1 >>>
                            -< Welcome to SoapBox! >-
================================================================================
Note 551.18                       Salary Freeze                         18 of 18
MEMORY::SLATER                                       13 lines  19-MAY-1989 09:16
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A rumor is circulating, which I just got wind of, that DEC has recently
    begun contributing to the state(s) unemployment fund. Supposedly
    this is required if there is a possibility of layoffs.
    
    I do not know if this is true but it raises a number of interesting
    questions. 1. This would imply that there are exceptions to employers
    contributing to unemployment insurance funds. 2. This would imply
    that the companies excepted would have an no layoff *POLICY*.
    
    Is it possible that there are public policies for us peons and another
    set that the company goes to the state with?
    
    Les
610.2Dejavu All Over AgainVAXWRK::CONNORWe are amusedFri May 19 1989 11:359
	Being a relatively long time Deccie, I have noticed that
	whenever Ken is asked that question, he has responded 
	in about the same fashion. He will NEVER say no lay offs.

	I dont think it will happen unless it gets really bad.
	Anyone who has been around here has seen hiring and salary
	freezes, major reorgs etc. However, One still gets the
	jitters wondering will THIS be the time?

610.3VLNVAX::OSTIGUYFri May 19 1989 11:569
    re. .1
    
    What I always believed it to be, was that DEC always paid money to the
    state employment department but since we've haven't had a lay off yet,
    we were given a discount to pay.  Whether we've started paying full
    amount, I haven't heard a peep.
    
    Anna
    
610.5HYDRA::LARUSurfin&#039; the ZuvuyaFri May 19 1989 12:445
    I believe that the "contributions" that an employer makes to
    the unemployment fund directly correlate to the number of layoffs
    by that employer during a prior reporting period, but are never zero.
    
    /bruce
610.6can't expect the Globe to get it rightCVG::THOMPSONProtect the guilty, punish the innocentFri May 19 1989 13:0410
    A 3 month freeze of pay raises (which means that your next raise
    is now three months further away) was announced yesterday. I've
    seen 4-5 memos on it already. Go ask your manager about it. 

    There is also discussion and information in HUMAN::DIGITAL. A pay
    raise delay is something that DEC has done more than once before
    to avoid layoffs. Given that state of the company today I'm surprised
    that anyone is surprised that it happened.

    		Alfred
610.7DICKNS::STANLEYWhat a long, strange trip its beenFri May 19 1989 13:4913
re: Note 610.6


    The Globe also had an article on the "rumored" Q1
    wage freeze Alfred.... right next to this article.
                                                                
    The memo I saw discussed a Q1 freeze that will be reviewed (not
    necessarily lifted) at the end of Q1.  
    
    Its not just the state of the company that worries me, its the
    state of the economy itself.
    
    Mary
610.8Here's the story on the Raise FreezeLEZAH::BOBBITTseeking the balanceFri May 19 1989 14:14186
	+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
	|d|i|g|i|t|a|l|       I N T E R O F F I C E   M E M O R A N D U M
	+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   
	TO: U.S. Employees		DATE:   19 May 1989

	                                FROM: 	Executive Committee



                                                      
	SUBJ:  SALARY DELAY

	     (This message is to be communicated to every US Employee)

	During the last several quarters, revenues were less than
	anticipated.  The U.S., in particular, saw demand fall below
	expectations while business remains strong in Europe and GIA.
	Steps have been taken to control costs by eliminating unnecessary
	spending and limiting hiring to only critical positions.

	As an additional step in the U.S., we also see the need to delay
	the FY90 U.S. Pay Program for all employees beginning in Q1.
	The situation will be reviewed at the end of Q1 to see if a 
	continuation of the delay is warranted.  It is, of course, our
	hope that business conditions will allow implementation of the
	pay program.

	This action will be reviewed on a country by country basis to
	determine whether similar steps are necessary.

	We appreciate your continued efforts and support as we address the
	current situation.  We also encourage you to continue your efforts
	to reduce and eliminate expenses in your cost center.

	We have the best people, the best products and magnificent 
	technology.  Our challenge now is to concentrate the efforts and
	assets of the entire corporation so that our customers have a
	clear understanding of our ability to satisfy their needs.






	COMMUNICATION PROCESS
	---------------------

	Thursday, May 18th
	------------------
	At  9:00 a.m.	You should begin communicating appropriate messages
			to your direct reports.

	By 11:00 a.m.	Your direct reports hold meetings or telephone
			conferences with managers who report to them and
			communicate the messages.

	Friday, May 19th
	----------------
	At  4:00 pm	Employee Communications puts up on LIVE WIRE the 
			salary communique.  A "pointer" will be placed on
			the Digital notesfile to "point" employees to 
			LIVE WIRE for information.

			Public Relations and Investor Relations will have
			statements to release to the media and financial 
			community.

		



	QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS:  RE:  THE SALARY INCREASE DELAY
	---------------------

	 1.  Is this worldwide?

	     The delay is being implemented in the U.S., where the 
	     revenue shortfall is most acute.  However, this action will be
	     reviewed on a country-by-country basis to determine whether
	     similar steps are necessary.


	 2.  Does this affect both exempt and nonexempt employees?

	     Yes, it affects all U.S. Digital employees.


	 3.  Will implementation of JEC in the U.S. be affected by this 
	     action?

	     No.  JEC will occur as planned, effective July 2, the first day
	     of the new fiscal year.  All managers should communicate these
	     classifications to employees by July 1.


	 4.  Will supervisors have new salary ranges to show employees when
	     communicating JEC job codes?

	     Yes.  Supervisors will have access to a revised FY90 structure,
	     which will remain in effect for the duration of the delay.  A
	     review of the FY90 structure will be conducted before the 
	     resumption of the pay program to determine if updates should 
	     occur.


	 5.  What if employees are below minimum or over maximum of their
	     new salary ranges when JEC is implemented on July 1?

	     In both situations, the current policies will apply at the end of
	     the delay when the new program commences.  Refer to the 
	     SALARY MANAGEMENT binder, Section 5, for more details concerning 
	     these policies.


	 6.  What will be the status of the remaining salary increases planned
	     for FY89?

	     The FY89 program should proceed as planned.  Senior management's
	     expectation is that there should be NO OVERSPENDING or overall
	     decrease in frequency from the approved FY89 plan.


	 7.  Should promotions continue during this delay?  If so, will there
	     be money to go along with them?  If the money is not available
	     during the delay, will a raise be retroactive once the delay is
	     over?

	     Promotions should continue as required by the business, but there
	     will be no money available to fund increases.  If an employee is
	     promoted and is below the minimum of the range, the current
	     policy of bringing the employee to the minimum of the range 
	     within three months will apply when the new pay program commences.
	     There will be no retroactive raises.  Also, the number of 
	     promotions and overall movement in the average salary range
	     indicators will be monitored during the delay period.


	 8.  Should performance reviews continue during this period?  If so,
	     how will they be used?

	     Yes.  Employees' performance reviews should continue during this
	     period.  Following policy, an employee's job performance should
	     be reviewed annually.  Performance ratings should be entered
	     onto the Employee Master File.  These may be used as the most
	     recent ratings when Salary Planning begins.


	 9.  What happens if an employee's job changes significantly due to
	     business changes or reorganization during the delay?

	     If an employee's job changes significantly at any time, he or
	     she may need to be re-classified.  During this salary increase
	     delay, as well as afterwards, employees should be classified 
	     correctly according to the work being performed.


	10.  Will an employee's salary review date change permanently?

	     Yes.  Every employee's salary review date will advance according
	     to the length of the salary increase delay.  In addition, the
	     timing of an increase also may be extended further based on the
	     employee's performance and position in the salary range.  
	     Please refer to the SALARY MANAGEMENT binder, Section 5,
	     for more details on timing of increases.


	11.  When will increases begin again?

	     The situation will be monitored by senior management and reviewed
	     at the end of Q1 to see if a continuation of the delay is 
	     warranted.  When the decision is made to end the delay, Salary
	     Planning will begin.  Employee salary increases will be granted
	     once the overall salary plan has been approved.


	12.  In the future, will the amount available for salary increases
	     across the company be linked to the company's performance?

	     The development of a salary increase budget is linked to several
	     factors.  While we strive to pay compeititively, equitably, and
	     for performance, we also have to look at another influencing 
	     factor -- affordability.  Company performance will always be a
	     consideration in what we can afford to deliver in salary increases.
610.9SUPER::HENDRICKSThe only way out is throughSun May 21 1989 16:1913
    When I worked for a non-profit agency a few years ago, I had to
    investigate the subject of unemployment contributions in Mass.  What's
    true for a small non-profit may be different than what's true for a
    large corporation, but at the time employers could choose one of two
    methods for contributions. 
    
    They could make regular contributions into the system according to a
    state formula based on numbers of employees (etc), or they could take
    a risk and make no contributions unless employees actually came
    forward to collect, at which point they would be required to bear a
    significantly larger amount of the burden than they would otherwise. 
                                            
    Holly