[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference turris::womannotes-v2

Title:ARCHIVE-- Topics of Interest to Women, Volume 2 --ARCHIVE
Notice:V2 is closed. TURRIS::WOMANNOTES-V5 is open.
Moderator:REGENT::BROOMHEAD
Created:Thu Jan 30 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 30 1995
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1105
Total number of notes:36379

380.0. "Demystifying divorce" by VIA::BAZEMORE (Barbara b.) Wed Jan 11 1989 13:16

    Most people know what is involved in getting married.  The blood
    test, the marriage license, and what is said at the traditional
    ceremony.  You see references to these things on television and
    in magazines quite frequently.  You rarely see what exactly is involved
    in a divorce.
    
    When I started the divorce process I had no idea how long it would
    take, how much it would cost, and what went on at the hearing. Now
    that the divorce is final I would like to share what I learned with
    others in hopes that someone else will get something useful out
    of it.  Please feel free to add any information you may have.
    
    I think my divorce was about as "easy" as it gets.  There were no
    children, it was nofault, uncontested, and we were able to agree on the
    division of assets.  There was no alimony involved (it is very
    difficult to get alimony in New Hampshire, and it didn't make sense for
    us anyway). 

    My memory isn't the greatest, so some of the legal terms and time
    tables may be off.  But here is what I recollect:
        
    Filing Papers
    
    I went to a divorce lawyer I had seen advertised in the paper. I didn't
    do any comparison shopping, although I suppose I should have.  She gave
    me a sheaf of papers to fill out and asked for a $600 retainer.  I
    filled out the papers with all the personal and financial information
    requested and returned them to her. They asked the standard stuff,
    name, address, etc, plus what date you were married, when you were
    separated, and when you last slept together (I don't know if that is
    standard, or if that was just for the lawyer).  Four or five of the
    eight documents were necessary for her to file the divorce request with
    the court.  The documents were filed about a week after my initial
    visit.
     
    My lawyer refused to represent my husband since that is illegal
    in New Hampshire.   She suggested he get his own lawyer.  I have
    heard of people sharing a divorce lawyer and having one partner
    be officially unrepresented.
    
    After filing, the spouse has to acknowledge that they've seen the
    papers.  If the spouse is agreeable they can pick up the papers at the
    courthouse and save you having to pay the sheriff's fee for serving the
    papers.  Once they are served the spouse signs them and returns them to
    the court. 
    
    The legal papers have some rather scary sounding name, but I forget
    what it is offhand.  
    
    Permanent Agreement
    
    Somewhere during this time a permanent agreement (division of debts
    and assets) is worked up.  You start out with something like a loan
    application as a worksheet, which lists all the major debts and
    assets, then add all of the personal items that you can remember.
    You try and work up a division that seems equitable then pass it
    back to your spouse to see if they agree.  After a pass or two of
    this the two of us zeroed in on a permanent agreement.  The agreement
    is signed by both parties and brought to the final hearing.
    
    I believe the lawyers were trying to get us to fight about the
    agreement so they could get us to spend more on lawyers fees.
    We did most of the negotiating by mail without getting the lawyers
    involved.  
    
    Waiting Period
    
    There are two waiting periods, a 30-day waiting period and a period
    while you wait for the busy court system to grant you a final hearing
    date.  We waived the 30-day wait and were able to get a court date
    within a month after filing for it.  My lawyer was pretty good about
    hounding them for an early date.  Requests for a Dec. court date had
    to be made by the second Tues of Nov.
    
    Final Hearing
    
    We had only one hearing since the divorce was uncontested.  The
    person who filed for divorce and their lawyer are the only ones
    required to be at the hearing.  Apparently it is rather rare to
    have both parties present at the hearing. 
    
    The hearing is in front of a "marital master" rather than in front of a
    judge.  The day I went the master had decided to sit in a side room
    rather than at the bench in the court room.  I was at the end of the
    list of uncontested divorces that morning, so I waited while four other
    people went into the room and had their final hearings.  The average
    final hearing takes about 5 minutes. 
    
    When my case was up I went into the side room with my lawyer and
    my spouse came along.  My lawyer swore me in.  The marital master 
    then asked a series of questions.  
    
    	- Are you so-and-so 
    	- did you get married on such and such a date
    	- did you marry so-and-so
    	- there were no children of this marriage
    	- is this the permanent agreement you signed
        - did you sign it of your own free will
    	- is your marriage broken beyond repair due to irreconcilable
    	  differences.
    
    I ended up saying "I do" to a couple of these questions due to the
    way they were phrased.  I thought this was an ironic way to end
    a marriage.  
    
    The marital master then wrote up a recommendation for the judge.
    And that was it.
    
    The judge approved the recommendation the next day and the divorce
    became final.  I didn't find out that it was final until almost
    two weeks later because that's how long it took the paper to move
    out of the courthouse and into the mail.
    
    Cost
    
    My lawyer charged me $642 in all, including court and filing fees.
    My ex-spouse's lawyer charged him around $525.
        
    Other Stuff
    
    I was quite surprised that they didn't require proof that we tried
    to get counseling or otherwise show that we had tried to reconcile.
    The lawyer asked very few personal questions.  I went in there,
    laid down some money, signed some papers, and bang, the divorce was under
    way.
     
    I was also surprised at the cost, I thought that it would be more.
    
    Well, this is more than I normally would want to write in a notesfile,
    but I hope it proves useful to someone.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
380.1RAINBO::TARBETWed Jan 11 1989 14:054
    Thanks for sharing that, Barbara.  I think it'll prove helpful to
    many other people contemplating the process.
    
    						=maggie
380.2Another ExperienceBOLT::MINOWWhy doesn't someone make a simple Risk chip?Wed Jan 11 1989 15:3826
It might be interesting to contrast that with a divorce in a different
legal system.

After living together for about 4 years, my ex- and I got married so she
could get a visa -- we decided to move from Sweden to the US so I could
get a better job (within Dec) and she could see what the states were
like.  We separated about 18 months later (mostly inability to communicate
and/or deal with job stress and the stress of a changed environment -- loss
of friends, etc.) and decided to finalize the divorce a few months later.

Eva's mother got the papers from the Stockholm court; we filled them out
and mailed them in.  I think her mother paid the $10 filing fee.  A few
month's later, the court mailed us the judgement.  All Swedish court
decisions must have a written "motivation."  Ours read "There is reason
to accept the request."  Neither of us ever appeared in court.  We split
property ourselves.  (Things are a bit more complicated if there are
children involved, or the divorce is contested, of course.)

Since I was about to buy a house, I paid a local lawyer $150 to write
up a Separation of Property Agreement.  I think I translated the court
decision for the lawyer: it was pretty straightforward.  When he saw
the Swedish papers, he said "This would put us all out of work."

Exactly.

Martin.
380.3DEMING::GARDNERjustme....jacquiWed Jan 11 1989 18:026
    I seem to recall sometime back that there was a book you could
    purchase in the Boston area about Do-it-yourself Divorce. Does
    anyone remember the title?  It might be helpful for anyone 
    to pursue this line.

380.4what goes around comes aroundCVG::THOMPSONNotes? What's Notes?Wed Jan 11 1989 19:049
    I once read a suggestion that it should only cost a few dollars
    to get a divorce and $1000s to get married instead of the other
    way around. This way there would be fewer failed marriages. Sounds
    like we're getting there. My brother who is getting re-married is
    complaining about how much it costs (their paying for everything).
    
    I'm not so sure it will save all that many marriages though.

    		Alfred
380.5One vs. TwoATPS::GREENHALGEMouseThu Jan 12 1989 09:2232
    
    I've been through it once and am going through it again, both under
    Massachusetts law.  Things really changed since 1980-81.
    
    Divorce #1 was filed in June 1980, papers served in July, support
    hearing in October.  Because it was a quick & easy uncontested divorce
    the judge said he'd grant it that day as well if I'd wait until the
    end.  I had filed on grounds of cruel and abusive treatment.  Little
    did I know then that I would have to take the stand and testify to
    those grounds against my husband in his presence.  The divorce was
    granted and became final 6 months later.
    
    Divorce #2 is in progress.  I originally filed in the summer of 1986.
    My husband has been contesting it and refused to accept the papers.
    It took 6 months for the sheriff to finally serve the papers.  A
    separation agreement was drawn up a year ago and has not been signed
    yet because of an issue over our son.
    
    I finally have a court date of Feb. 3, for my support hearing.  It was
    necessary to petition the court to have my husband brought to trial as
    he is so unwilling to cooperate and work with us.
    
    When I'll get into court for the actual divorce hearing is another
    thing altogether.  Massachusetts courts are very slow.  At least the
    waiting period for the divorce to become final has been reduced to 3
    months.
    
    Cost? - Divorce #1 was $672.00 for everything.  Divorce #2 was to cost
    around $750.00, which is the retainer fee requested.  Actual cost is
    now up around $2000.00.  Big difference from 8-9 years ago.
    
    Beckie
380.6Divorce In MassachusettsBOSHOG::STRIFEbut for.....i wouldn't be me.Thu Jan 12 1989 09:5939
    The following is what happens with an "uncontested no-fault" divorce.
    
    A joint petition signed by both parties or their attorneys is filed
    with the court. The only prerequisite is that the parties have to
    have bee "living apart" for a minimum of 30 days.  Along with the
    petition a certified copy of the marriage certificate and some court
    forms get filed.  Before you can get a court date a signed "Agreement"
    and, if there are children, Child Support worksheets must be filed
    with the court.  Once everything is files you can request a court
    date (usually can get in most of the courts within a month) and
    there is about a 5 minute hearing on the matter.  Both parties have
    to be present.  Massachusetts has what is called a "rule nisi" which
    bascially means the divorce isn't final for awhile.  With a nonconteste
    no fault the rule nisi enters automatically 30 days after the hearing
    and alot of judges just let it enter automatically instead of signing
    it earlier.  The divorce is final 90 days after the nisi enters.
    In most cases you end up with the divorce being final 120 days after
    the hearing.
    
    Contested "no fault" divorces work a little differently.  The party
    filing files a complaint with the court.  The other side is served
    by the deputy sherriff's dept.  From the date of filing there is
    a six month waiting period before you can request a court date.
    If you can't come to an Agreement on property, support, custody
    etc. before the end of the 6 mos. the parties sit down with a mediator.
    If they still can't reach an agreement, then the case goes to trial.
    It takes along time to get a trial date, mostly becasue the courts
    are so clogged.  If the parties can come to an agreement (especially
    before the 6 mos are up) they can change to an uncontested no-fault
    and the 6mos. no longer applies.  The same rule nisi period applies
    to both types of nofault divorces.
    
    "Fault" divorces are becoming rare.  They seem to be used mostly
    as a form of vindictiveness  or where one party won't cooperate
    and the other doesn't want to wait the extra 6 mos.  I"m not saying
    that they are never justified - just that the no fault route is
    easier and more often used.
    
    
380.7cheap and easy in Mass!CASV02::LUSTYou want WHAT by WHEN?Thu Jan 12 1989 13:3528
    This is the cheap/easy way - assuming no arguments.  
    
    We had gone to a lawyer together, stating that we had worked out
    all issues, and didn't want a "divorce lawyer" but rather someone
    to simply help with the paperwork, and facilitate the court hearing.
    He wanted $700, and said he would only work with one of us, and
    only if the other had a lawyer as well.  We walked out!
    
    My ex then called the court, in Boston, to ask if we could do it
    ourselves, and what was involved.  They said, we'll send you the
    paperwork, fill it out and send it back with a $25 filing fee. 
    They sent us an impressive pile of paperwork, and some directions
    on filling it out.  We guessed at a couple terms, and asked for
    definitions of a couple, but basically had very little problems
    with the paperwork.  We send it back, with the fee, and got the
    paperwork back quickly, with a couple minor points clarified, and
    changes requested.  Shortly after these were sent back to the courts,
    we received notification to be at the Concord courthouse (nearest
    one to us?) at a specific date/time for our hearing.  On that day,
    it took maybe five minutes before the judge, and it was done!
    
    Total cost $25  - total time beginning to end, a couple months,
    but only a few hours effort.   Easy!   BTW - there were children,
    so the paperwork included the support agreement, and a few other
    extra things, but no undue complications.  As far as I can see,
    lawyers should only be involved if there *are* disagreements!  
    
    Linda
380.8Do-It-Yourself (Pro Se) Divorce in NHMOSAIC::TARBETFri Jan 13 1989 09:5546
    The following response is from a member of our community who wishes
    to remain anonymous at this time.
    
    						=maggie
    
    ===================================================================

    In New Hampshire, you can use a do-it-yourself approach if the divorce
    is uncontested and relatively simple.  The New Hampshire Pro Se Divorce
    Project ("pro se" means "for yourself", I think), in Concord, has
    prepared a package that they'll send you for a nominal ($5?) fee, and
    it describes and follows very much the same process that Barbara
    outlined in .0. 

    The Pro Se package includes sample papers that you have to prepare and
    file, discussing process and the approximate time frames.  When I went
    through this a few years ago, I got the Pro Se package and then bought
    one hour of a lawyer's time before deciding whether or not to try to go
    through the process without lawyers.  I asked the lawyer about possible
    pitfalls of the process, got some tips on the language to use in
    identifying who gets to keep what, and got answers to some technical
    questions about filling out the forms. 

    The total cost of the process was about $125 -- about $65 for filing
    fees, and $60 for the lawyer's consultation.   We were able to use the
    process because the divorce was uncontested, there were no major
    problems in dividing any assets, and there was no child support
    involved. 

    I don't remember exactly how to contact the group that supplied the
    information.  The group is probably listed in directory assistance as
    the Pro Se Divorce Project (possibly with "New Hampshire" tacked on the
    front); if not, a call to the Attorney- General's office ought to do
    the trick. 

    A final note:  at the final hearing before the master, our case, too,
    was the last one to be heard; we were the only ones not represented by
    lawyers (as well as the only ones who both appeared); and the
    judge/master asked similar questions as in .0. At least half of the
    other people were asked demeaning and embarrassing questions *by their
    own lawyer!* -- questions such as when they last had marital relations,
    or whether their spouse slept around, or whether they slept around.
    Good grief, the whole process is difficult enough without having to
    endure that kind of crap from someone who is ostensibly on your own
    side. 
         
380.10Going the Pro Se routeSCOMAN::ATAMIANFri Jan 20 1989 17:5011
    I am in the process of getting a pro se (do it yourself) divorce
    in Mass. My wife and I are using a lawyer for the consutation 
    part, who is drawing up the required agreement and was there to
    answer all questions. We are very happy with this solution as
    neither of us likes form filling out. The lawyer is a woman who
    teaches at Northeastern Law School and worksout of her home in
    Brookline. Cost is $250.00 plus $110.00 court filing fee. I will
    be happy to refer you, just send mail. Almost forgot! There can
    be no disputes over property, children or support. I'll send 
    details if you write.