T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
380.1 | | RAINBO::TARBET | | Wed Jan 11 1989 14:05 | 4 |
| Thanks for sharing that, Barbara. I think it'll prove helpful to
many other people contemplating the process.
=maggie
|
380.2 | Another Experience | BOLT::MINOW | Why doesn't someone make a simple Risk chip? | Wed Jan 11 1989 15:38 | 26 |
| It might be interesting to contrast that with a divorce in a different
legal system.
After living together for about 4 years, my ex- and I got married so she
could get a visa -- we decided to move from Sweden to the US so I could
get a better job (within Dec) and she could see what the states were
like. We separated about 18 months later (mostly inability to communicate
and/or deal with job stress and the stress of a changed environment -- loss
of friends, etc.) and decided to finalize the divorce a few months later.
Eva's mother got the papers from the Stockholm court; we filled them out
and mailed them in. I think her mother paid the $10 filing fee. A few
month's later, the court mailed us the judgement. All Swedish court
decisions must have a written "motivation." Ours read "There is reason
to accept the request." Neither of us ever appeared in court. We split
property ourselves. (Things are a bit more complicated if there are
children involved, or the divorce is contested, of course.)
Since I was about to buy a house, I paid a local lawyer $150 to write
up a Separation of Property Agreement. I think I translated the court
decision for the lawyer: it was pretty straightforward. When he saw
the Swedish papers, he said "This would put us all out of work."
Exactly.
Martin.
|
380.3 | | DEMING::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Wed Jan 11 1989 18:02 | 6 |
|
I seem to recall sometime back that there was a book you could
purchase in the Boston area about Do-it-yourself Divorce. Does
anyone remember the title? It might be helpful for anyone
to pursue this line.
|
380.4 | what goes around comes around | CVG::THOMPSON | Notes? What's Notes? | Wed Jan 11 1989 19:04 | 9 |
| I once read a suggestion that it should only cost a few dollars
to get a divorce and $1000s to get married instead of the other
way around. This way there would be fewer failed marriages. Sounds
like we're getting there. My brother who is getting re-married is
complaining about how much it costs (their paying for everything).
I'm not so sure it will save all that many marriages though.
Alfred
|
380.5 | One vs. Two | ATPS::GREENHALGE | Mouse | Thu Jan 12 1989 09:22 | 32 |
|
I've been through it once and am going through it again, both under
Massachusetts law. Things really changed since 1980-81.
Divorce #1 was filed in June 1980, papers served in July, support
hearing in October. Because it was a quick & easy uncontested divorce
the judge said he'd grant it that day as well if I'd wait until the
end. I had filed on grounds of cruel and abusive treatment. Little
did I know then that I would have to take the stand and testify to
those grounds against my husband in his presence. The divorce was
granted and became final 6 months later.
Divorce #2 is in progress. I originally filed in the summer of 1986.
My husband has been contesting it and refused to accept the papers.
It took 6 months for the sheriff to finally serve the papers. A
separation agreement was drawn up a year ago and has not been signed
yet because of an issue over our son.
I finally have a court date of Feb. 3, for my support hearing. It was
necessary to petition the court to have my husband brought to trial as
he is so unwilling to cooperate and work with us.
When I'll get into court for the actual divorce hearing is another
thing altogether. Massachusetts courts are very slow. At least the
waiting period for the divorce to become final has been reduced to 3
months.
Cost? - Divorce #1 was $672.00 for everything. Divorce #2 was to cost
around $750.00, which is the retainer fee requested. Actual cost is
now up around $2000.00. Big difference from 8-9 years ago.
Beckie
|
380.6 | Divorce In Massachusetts | BOSHOG::STRIFE | but for.....i wouldn't be me. | Thu Jan 12 1989 09:59 | 39 |
| The following is what happens with an "uncontested no-fault" divorce.
A joint petition signed by both parties or their attorneys is filed
with the court. The only prerequisite is that the parties have to
have bee "living apart" for a minimum of 30 days. Along with the
petition a certified copy of the marriage certificate and some court
forms get filed. Before you can get a court date a signed "Agreement"
and, if there are children, Child Support worksheets must be filed
with the court. Once everything is files you can request a court
date (usually can get in most of the courts within a month) and
there is about a 5 minute hearing on the matter. Both parties have
to be present. Massachusetts has what is called a "rule nisi" which
bascially means the divorce isn't final for awhile. With a nonconteste
no fault the rule nisi enters automatically 30 days after the hearing
and alot of judges just let it enter automatically instead of signing
it earlier. The divorce is final 90 days after the nisi enters.
In most cases you end up with the divorce being final 120 days after
the hearing.
Contested "no fault" divorces work a little differently. The party
filing files a complaint with the court. The other side is served
by the deputy sherriff's dept. From the date of filing there is
a six month waiting period before you can request a court date.
If you can't come to an Agreement on property, support, custody
etc. before the end of the 6 mos. the parties sit down with a mediator.
If they still can't reach an agreement, then the case goes to trial.
It takes along time to get a trial date, mostly becasue the courts
are so clogged. If the parties can come to an agreement (especially
before the 6 mos are up) they can change to an uncontested no-fault
and the 6mos. no longer applies. The same rule nisi period applies
to both types of nofault divorces.
"Fault" divorces are becoming rare. They seem to be used mostly
as a form of vindictiveness or where one party won't cooperate
and the other doesn't want to wait the extra 6 mos. I"m not saying
that they are never justified - just that the no fault route is
easier and more often used.
|
380.7 | cheap and easy in Mass! | CASV02::LUST | You want WHAT by WHEN? | Thu Jan 12 1989 13:35 | 28 |
| This is the cheap/easy way - assuming no arguments.
We had gone to a lawyer together, stating that we had worked out
all issues, and didn't want a "divorce lawyer" but rather someone
to simply help with the paperwork, and facilitate the court hearing.
He wanted $700, and said he would only work with one of us, and
only if the other had a lawyer as well. We walked out!
My ex then called the court, in Boston, to ask if we could do it
ourselves, and what was involved. They said, we'll send you the
paperwork, fill it out and send it back with a $25 filing fee.
They sent us an impressive pile of paperwork, and some directions
on filling it out. We guessed at a couple terms, and asked for
definitions of a couple, but basically had very little problems
with the paperwork. We send it back, with the fee, and got the
paperwork back quickly, with a couple minor points clarified, and
changes requested. Shortly after these were sent back to the courts,
we received notification to be at the Concord courthouse (nearest
one to us?) at a specific date/time for our hearing. On that day,
it took maybe five minutes before the judge, and it was done!
Total cost $25 - total time beginning to end, a couple months,
but only a few hours effort. Easy! BTW - there were children,
so the paperwork included the support agreement, and a few other
extra things, but no undue complications. As far as I can see,
lawyers should only be involved if there *are* disagreements!
Linda
|
380.8 | Do-It-Yourself (Pro Se) Divorce in NH | MOSAIC::TARBET | | Fri Jan 13 1989 09:55 | 46 |
| The following response is from a member of our community who wishes
to remain anonymous at this time.
=maggie
===================================================================
In New Hampshire, you can use a do-it-yourself approach if the divorce
is uncontested and relatively simple. The New Hampshire Pro Se Divorce
Project ("pro se" means "for yourself", I think), in Concord, has
prepared a package that they'll send you for a nominal ($5?) fee, and
it describes and follows very much the same process that Barbara
outlined in .0.
The Pro Se package includes sample papers that you have to prepare and
file, discussing process and the approximate time frames. When I went
through this a few years ago, I got the Pro Se package and then bought
one hour of a lawyer's time before deciding whether or not to try to go
through the process without lawyers. I asked the lawyer about possible
pitfalls of the process, got some tips on the language to use in
identifying who gets to keep what, and got answers to some technical
questions about filling out the forms.
The total cost of the process was about $125 -- about $65 for filing
fees, and $60 for the lawyer's consultation. We were able to use the
process because the divorce was uncontested, there were no major
problems in dividing any assets, and there was no child support
involved.
I don't remember exactly how to contact the group that supplied the
information. The group is probably listed in directory assistance as
the Pro Se Divorce Project (possibly with "New Hampshire" tacked on the
front); if not, a call to the Attorney- General's office ought to do
the trick.
A final note: at the final hearing before the master, our case, too,
was the last one to be heard; we were the only ones not represented by
lawyers (as well as the only ones who both appeared); and the
judge/master asked similar questions as in .0. At least half of the
other people were asked demeaning and embarrassing questions *by their
own lawyer!* -- questions such as when they last had marital relations,
or whether their spouse slept around, or whether they slept around.
Good grief, the whole process is difficult enough without having to
endure that kind of crap from someone who is ostensibly on your own
side.
|
380.10 | Going the Pro Se route | SCOMAN::ATAMIAN | | Fri Jan 20 1989 17:50 | 11 |
| I am in the process of getting a pro se (do it yourself) divorce
in Mass. My wife and I are using a lawyer for the consutation
part, who is drawing up the required agreement and was there to
answer all questions. We are very happy with this solution as
neither of us likes form filling out. The lawyer is a woman who
teaches at Northeastern Law School and worksout of her home in
Brookline. Cost is $250.00 plus $110.00 court filing fee. I will
be happy to refer you, just send mail. Almost forgot! There can
be no disputes over property, children or support. I'll send
details if you write.
|