T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
351.1 | I'm not a doctor but I am The Doctah...:-) | ERLANG::LEVESQUE | I fish, therefore I am... | Tue Dec 20 1988 13:43 | 12 |
| During pregnancy, certain hormones are secreted by the woman's body
that actually soften the bones of the pelvis (and elsewhere if I
am not mistaken). A similar hormone is present in the fetus which
serves to keep the bones somewhat pliable to allow the child the
easiest possible passage through the birth canal into the light
of day.
I believe there is some shape changing due to the weight of the
fetus in the pelvic and pubic bones. Most of the shape change occurs
during the second stage of labor, I believe.
Mark
|
351.2 | Are You Sure You Want To Know? | FDCV16::ROSS | | Tue Dec 20 1988 14:00 | 10 |
| Re: .0
Where do babies come from......?
Why, from the stork, of course.
Shhesh, I thought everyone knew that. :-)
Alan
|
351.3 | you aren't a doctor and your science is wrong... | WMOIS::B_REINKE | Mirabile dictu | Tue Dec 20 1988 14:03 | 15 |
| Mark,
The bones do not soften or get more pliable. To do that they would
have to turn to cartilage. What happens is that the ligaments holding
the bones together relax under the influence of hormomes so that
the two pelvic bones move apart in the front.
Further the bones in the baby's body (the skull in particular) are
not soft either. Rather the joints (sutures) between the skull bones
have not yet fused. This allows the skull bones to move during
birth, causing the baby's head to be compressed during birth. These
sutures close after the baby is born (the 'soft' spot is the largest
one).
Bonnie
|
351.4 | | HACKIN::MACKIN | Sometimes you just need a KITA | Tue Dec 20 1988 14:32 | 2 |
| Thank you, Bonnie. Know I know why my phys. book has those funny ligaments
there.
|
351.5 | next time I'll check out my "facts" with a book | ERLANG::LEVESQUE | I fish, therefore I am... | Tue Dec 20 1988 15:00 | 8 |
| Thanks, Bonnie. I was just relaying the information that my birthing
class instructor gave us last week. I stand corrected. Armed with
this new knowledge, I'll take her to task this week and see if she
was really only informing us in a general sense or what. You're
correct. As I previously stated, I'm not a doctor. And she's only
an RN.
Mark
|
351.6 | | WMOIS::B_REINKE | Mirabile dictu | Tue Dec 20 1988 15:06 | 6 |
| Mark,
If the bones actually soften that is news since I last taught
a course in anatomy 8 years ago. :-) Have her give references!
Bonnie
|
351.7 | I'll try to find out on Thursday | ERLANG::LEVESQUE | I fish, therefore I am... | Tue Dec 20 1988 15:21 | 21 |
| Given that the majority of her audience is not from a technical
background, she may have seen fit to gloss over the details in such
a way that the mechanics involved were incorrectly presented. I
am certainly not disputing your claim as you have shown beyond question
that you are far more attuned to biology than I am. Since high school
biology (97 for the course) I haven't had any occasion to further
study that field. It is obvious from having read your notes that
you have alot more experience and knowledge in that area than I
do and I would not propose that it were otherwise. To do so would
certainly insult you as much as it would insult me if you asserted
that your knowledge of fishing were as extensive as mine (although
you probably stand a better chance of knowing as much about fishing
as I do than me knowing about bio). On the contrary, I simply want
her to explain things in an accurate, technical manner. She said
the bones soften and I swallowed it, having no other knowledge upon
which to base a question. Now that I have such knowledge, I will,
in fact, ask her to either cite sources or direct me to appropriate
literature. My problem isn't inability to understand, it's more
like where to look.
Mark
|
351.8 | I didn't mean to sound teacherish | WMOIS::B_REINKE | Mirabile dictu | Tue Dec 20 1988 15:57 | 8 |
| Mark,
I appreciate where you are coming from. The last remark was meant
to be a silly one. And having been away from teaching now for
almost 8 years my memory for details is wearing a bit and I do
forget things.
Bonnie
|
351.9 | | STC::HEFFELFINGER | Aliens made me write this. | Tue Dec 20 1988 16:26 | 12 |
| Specifically, the hormones are prostaglandins and they are
also reponsible for relaxing smooth muscle tissue which why pregnant
women experience heartburn (the sphincter at the top of the stomach is
not as efficient) and constipation (Ditto for the intestines).
This loosening of the ligaments as also why pregnant women are told
not to lift large weights - you're more easily injured.
tlh
5 month prego who's been reading a lot lately :-)
|
351.10 | something I forgot to mention | WMOIS::B_REINKE | Mirabile dictu | Tue Dec 20 1988 16:33 | 5 |
| I am reminded that tendons (muscle to bone attachments) as well
as ligaments (bone to bone) relax during pregnancy. I focused
in on the ligaments to explain about the bone situation.
Bonnie
|
351.11 | Somre relief | VINO::EVANS | It's: Rest Ye Merry - COMMA - Gentlemen! | Wed Dec 21 1988 10:52 | 6 |
| Side note: All of this is one reason why women have back problems
during (and sometimes after) pregnancy. Therapeutic massage is an
excellent idea at this time.
--DE
|
351.12 | snoring a side-effect of pregnancy? | TFH::MARSHALL | hunting the snark | Wed Dec 21 1988 11:54 | 18 |
| When Arlene was pregnant last, she became a terrible snorer. I mean,
like, really, _really_, loud. Near the end it got so loud that we
would trade sleeping on the couch. Since then, however, it has stopped
(or at least gone back down to normal ignorable volumes).
At first we thought that it was just because she had to sleep on
her back, but that wasn't it, she was just as loud on her side,
and her sleeping position is the same now.
I was just wondering if it could have been due to those hormones,
and if anyone else has experienced this.
/
( ___
) ///
/
|
351.13 | just wondered | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | remember to live & let live | Wed Dec 21 1988 15:06 | 10 |
| Bonnie, in cases (like myself) where the woman has to have a C-section
because the baby's head won't fit through the pelvic bones, is that
because whatever is described here as happening doesn't happen -
or is it that it does happen, and there still isn't room for the
baby to get through?
Thought you might know.
Lorna
|
351.14 | quick answer | WMOIS::B_REINKE | Mirabile dictu | Wed Dec 21 1988 15:14 | 13 |
| Lorna,
I don't know about every case, but mine was like yours, there
still wasn't room for the baby to get through. From what I
have read that is the most common situation.
The human is at the very outer edge of the head size of the
baby to mother's birth canal ratio. We actually carry our
babies just a bit too long for optimum ease of delivery tho
quite a bit too short as far as the ability of the infant to
cope after birth (compared to other primates and mammals.)
Bonnie
|
351.15 | | NEXUS::CONLON | | Wed Dec 21 1988 15:21 | 18 |
| RE: .14
Agreed. To put it another way, one of the reasons that human
infants come into the world in a much more "helpless" state
than other primates and mammals is because humans are born
at around the time when the baby's head reaches the maximum
size it can grow (and still have a chance of the baby
being delivered vaginally.)
Depending on the size of the Mother's pelvis, some babies
are delivered past the point of having a head small enough to
make it through the birth canal safely (thus, a C-section is
required.)
If not for this problem with the infant head to Mother's pelvis
ratio, human infants would likely enjoy a much longer gestation
period (which would enable them to be born closer to the level of
development that other primates and mammals have at birth.)
|
351.16 | One possible explanation for snoring during pregnancy | HSSWS1::GREG | Malice Aforethought | Wed Dec 21 1988 16:04 | 21 |
| re: .12 (Steve)
> I was just wondering if it could have been due to those hormones,
> and if anyone else has experienced this.
Based on the research I have done, I think I can provide
a more likely explanation.
During pregnancy the uterus expands dramatically, and in
the process displaces other internal organs (notably, the
diaphragm, the stomach, and even the heart). In some cases
the pressure is such that the heart is pressed up against
the esophagus, causing the woman to 'feel her heart in her
throat'. This same pressure applied in just the wrong way
could potentially induce excessive snoring, as the upper
esophageal airway becomes distended/compressed (depending
on the way the pressure is applied).
Did your wife experience the 'heart in the throat' syndrome?
- Greg
|
351.18 | | TFH::MARSHALL | hunting the snark | Thu Dec 22 1988 12:41 | 18 |
| re .16:
Thanks for the analysis. Isn't the esophagus the tube to the stomach?
Isn't the airway the trachea? Isn't snoring caused by "flapping"
of the soft palate?
> Did your wife experience the 'heart in the throat' syndrome?
She never mentioned it, but I'll ask.
{now where did I say she was my wife? :-) Be careful with
assumptions. We _are_ married, but I have become sensitized to the
connotations of the phrase "my wife" so I try to avoid using it.}
/
( ___
) ///
/
|
351.19 | Just something to consider | HSSWS1::GREG | Malice Aforethought | Thu Dec 22 1988 15:09 | 20 |
| re: .18 (Steve)
> Thanks for the analysis. Isn't the esophagus the tube to the stomach?
> Isn't the airway the trachea? Isn't snoring caused by "flapping"
> of the soft palate?
Correct, but the way the book described it, it sounded
very much like this might be a related problem. The 'heart
in the throat' syndrome was what led me to conclude there
might be some relation. The book ("Maggie's Woman's Book",
chapter two) is rather sketchy on the details, and does not
mention snoring directly.
> {now where did I say she was my wife? :-) Be careful with
> assumptions. We _are_ married, but I have become sensitized to the
> connotations of the phrase "my wife" so I try to avoid using it.}
Whoops... sorry, old bean... it won't happen again.
- Greg
|