| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 326.1 | I'm so good, I'm bad! | WOODRO::FAHEL | Amalthea, the Silver Unicorn | Mon Dec 05 1988 09:06 | 5 | 
|  |     And what is wrong with being a "Good Girl"?
    
    (I ranked 23)
    
    K.C.
 | 
| 326.2 |  | COGMK::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Mon Dec 05 1988 12:26 | 5 | 
|  |     Re: .1
    
    Judging from what I saw in the survey, a "Good Girl" allows others
    to think for her and dictate her actions, possibly because she has
    low self-esteem and seeks approval/affirmation/acceptance.
 | 
| 326.3 |  | ULTRA::ZURKO | UI:Where the rubber meets the road | Mon Dec 05 1988 12:43 | 7 | 
|  | ... which is why I'm surprised I only got a 20.
I do have a lot of issues around anger, parents, and approval from authority
figures. But a lot of my authority figures these days are women! So, I think
the survey is _very_ skewed towards overcoming male dominance. Which I have
:-).
	Mez
 | 
| 326.4 | no good girl here | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | a simple twist of fate | Mon Dec 05 1988 12:47 | 4 | 
|  |     I got a 13.
    
    Lorna
    
 | 
| 326.5 |  | SLSTRN::DONAHUE | the Imp | Mon Dec 05 1988 13:02 | 8 | 
|  |     No flames, just my humble opinion.
    
    When I first read the survey, I was a little set off.
    If I'm assertive and my own person, that's not "GOOD"?
    
    Anyway, I got a 26.  I'm not too good, either.
    
    Susan
 | 
| 326.6 | What is "good" you ask? | ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI | Ah, the road within without | Mon Dec 05 1988 15:22 | 19 | 
|  |     
    	The test reflects the results of a parenting style that tends to 
    "invalidate" a young person's actual perceptions and feelings, for the 
    sake of teaching what is supposedly "good". This is embodied in the 
    following example statement:
    
    "You dont want those shoes, you want these ones here. Good people wont 
    like you if you wore those shoes"
    
    	In this example, the freedom to choose what one *really* wants
    goes out the window in favor of what one is *supposed* to want. Note
    how it is supported by a follow-up statement that is utter ca-ca, in
    regards to what is "good".
    
    	The ramifications of this parenting style are manifold, effecting
    adult self-esteem and behaviors.
    
    	Joe Jas
              
 | 
| 326.7 | I didn't do so good | AZUR::HACHE |  | Tue Dec 06 1988 04:50 | 18 | 
|  |     
    
    I'm not sure the answer to the test would always be the same either,
    when I was single and living alone I would have been somewhere in the
    20 range also,  but with many changes in my life and lifestyle
    (i.e. move to a new country, marriage to a European, etc) my rating
    was in the high 40's.  That probably explains why I'm frustrated
    and angry most of the time,  I need to do some heavy attitude
    adjustment.  I find that being uprooted from what was my comfort zone
    has lowered my self-confidence a great deal.  Moving to a new culture
    causes you to have a lot more doubt about yourself, you constantly
    think it is them or is it me...
    
    Anyway,  I thought the test was interesting even if I was devestated
    by the results.
    
    				Cheers..
    					
 | 
| 326.8 |  | CSC32::SPARROW | MYTHing, once again | Tue Dec 06 1988 12:06 | 5 | 
|  |     I just took the test, got a score of 3. 
    according to the test, I'm not doing so bad, but then I didn't think
    I had a problem before the test.  
    
    vivian
 | 
| 326.9 | :-} | WMOIS::B_REINKE | Mirabile dictu | Tue Dec 06 1988 12:12 | 6 | 
|  |     Vivian,
    
    I got a 6....my husband commented that he'd always known I was
    an independant person.
    
    Bonnie
 | 
| 326.11 | hmmmm | LEZAH::BOBBITT | recursive finger-pointing ensued | Tue Dec 06 1988 13:44 | 6 | 
|  |     26
    
    guess I'll have to work on it...
    
    -Jody
    
 | 
| 326.12 | a PERFECT *10* | RAVEN1::AAGESEN | strugglin' for the legal tender . . . | Tue Dec 06 1988 14:32 | 7 | 
|  |     
    
    Guess I must be part of some minority.  I had to default better
    than 25% of these questions with "not applicable". (n/a's = 0,
    right?:-}) 
    
    
 | 
| 326.13 | An 8!!! | BSS::VANFLEET | 6 Impossible Things Before Breakfast | Tue Dec 06 1988 15:49 | 4 | 
|  |     What a shock...I'm doing better than I thought!
    
    Nanci
    
 | 
| 326.14 |  | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | a simple twist of fate | Tue Dec 06 1988 15:51 | 9 | 
|  |     Re .12, how could that many be "not applicable"?  The only one that was
    "not applicable" for me was the one about needing parents advice
    or approvable all the time or whatever, so I put 0.  (If parents
    are not living or elderly and senile it wouldn't apply.)
    Just wondering.
    
    Lorna
    
 | 
| 326.15 |  | USMFG::PJEFFRIES | the best is better | Tue Dec 06 1988 16:27 | 4 | 
|  |     
    I'm a 6, but I'm not suprised.
    
    +pat+
 | 
| 326.16 | these seemed non-applicable | RAVEN1::AAGESEN | strugglin' for the legal tender . . . | Tue Dec 06 1988 16:46 | 8 | 
|  |     re .14, lorna
    
    I wrote off as n/a  8,9,11,15,17,24,25,36,37 . . . . .that's 9/40
    
    (well, almost 25%)
    
    
    robin
 | 
| 326.17 | could it be...? | CIVIC::JOHNSTON | a pole in my right half-plane? pfthhhh! | Tue Dec 06 1988 16:55 | 8 | 
|  |     When I first tallied the 8, I thought that it might mean I'm <*gasp!*>
    ...well...strident.
    
    But then I realised that I just don't care.
    
      Ann
    
    p.s. glad, but not surprised, to see all the low scores.
 | 
| 326.18 | could it be age, er um, or experience :-) ? | WMOIS::B_REINKE | Mirabile dictu | Tue Dec 06 1988 17:03 | 8 | 
|  |     Ann, 
    
    I've met both Pat Jeffres and Marge Davis, and I don't think either
    of them are strident, and I don't think I am (tho others will have
    to attest to that). One thing that the three of us have in common
    is that we are all over 40. That may have an effect on our scores.
    
    Bonnie
 | 
| 326.19 |  | BANZAI::M_DAVIS | Beyond the ridiculous to the sublime... | Tue Dec 06 1988 17:30 | 6 | 
|  |     Bonnie, I don't consider you strident either, but then again, it
    may be a case of "Marge you're so strident, you wouldn't know one
    if it bit you!"  Over 40 does count in my book.  If I'd taken this
    test in my early 20's, the number would be MUCH higher... 
    
    Marge
 | 
| 326.20 |  | SSDEVO::GALLUP | Arizona 68 Temple 50!!!!! | Tue Dec 06 1988 19:09 | 17 | 
|  | 
	 sure is nice to have a workstation with a calculator on it!
	 :-)
	 I ranked a 15....but there were 3 or 4 questions that I
	 REALLY didn't want to answer 1 or 2 to because I don't want
	 to do things like that or feel that way , but I end up do
	 it/feeling it anyway....
	 room for improvement, I guess...those 3 or 4 questions really
	 made me think, though!
	 (i'm only 23, I've got plenty of time to "change my ways" on
	 those 3 or 4, right?)  8^)  
	 kath
 | 
| 326.21 |  | WMOIS::B_REINKE | Mirabile dictu | Tue Dec 06 1988 19:24 | 5 | 
|  |     Marge,
    
    It would have been MUCH higher for me also 20 years ago!
    
    Bonnie
 | 
| 326.22 |  | VLNVAX::OSTIGUY |  | Wed Dec 07 1988 07:41 | 1 | 
|  |     I scored an 8.  I'm not surprised.  
 | 
| 326.23 | I wonder???? | USMFG::PJEFFRIES | the best is better | Wed Dec 07 1988 08:43 | 5 | 
|  |     
    
    It would have been much higher for me 20 years ago also. BTW I've
    been divorced 20 years, (I wonder if that has anything to do with
    it?)
 | 
| 326.24 | 13 at age 32 | VAXRT::CANNOY | Convictions cause convicts. | Wed Dec 07 1988 09:03 | 7 | 
|  |     Well, I came in at 13. Not too bad. I did have 3 questions that
    were 2, all of which are problems which I have known about for
    a long time and am continuing to work on. A couple of the questions
    that I had to answer as 1 surprised me a little bit. Always room
    for improvement, I guess.
    
    Tamzen
 | 
| 326.25 | but 20 yrs. ago I was a _very_ good girl | CIVIC::JOHNSTON | a pole in my right half-plane? pfthhhh! | Wed Dec 07 1988 09:47 | 12 | 
|  |     Bonnie, et al.
    
    I thought my phrasing made it _abundantly_ clear, that I was being
    silly. So I left off the smiley face. I don't think that I'm strident
    in the least [all ranting from my brother-in-law to the contrary]
    
    For the record, I am 33.  I've been away from my parents for 17
    years, and married for 15 to a man whose dust I wold be eating if
    I showed that kind of deferential attitude -- supportive, but not
    supporting of dependency.
    
      Ann
 | 
| 326.26 | I got a "7"! | PARITY::DDAVIS | THINK SUNSHINE | Wed Dec 07 1988 10:00 | 7 | 
|  |     I wasn't going to do this because I KNEW I wasn't a "good girl"
    but after reading all the replies I just had to find out how "bad"
    I really was.  It was not a surprise!
   
    Thanks for posting this.
    
    -Dotti.
 | 
| 326.27 | I got a 34 | DMGDTA::WASKOM |  | Wed Dec 07 1988 11:33 | 11 | 
|  |     
    
    So ok, I'm the quintessential 'dutiful daughter'.  I'm 36 and divorced.
    
    But a lot of these I answered with a "1" 'cause sometimes it matters
    and sometimes it doesn't what the other folks in my life think -
    but I'M the one to decide when it matters. :-)
    
    			Alison
    
    
 | 
| 326.28 | I like me | WOODRO::FAHEL | Amalthea, the Silver Unicorn | Wed Dec 07 1988 12:24 | 4 | 
|  |     I am perfectly happy just the way I am.  I feel no need for
    "improvement". 
    
    K.C.
 | 
| 326.29 |  | AQUA::WALKER |  | Wed Dec 07 1988 13:39 | 3 | 
|  |     I'm bad!
    
    m
 | 
| 326.30 |  | COGMK::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Wed Dec 07 1988 14:31 | 13 | 
|  |     I work out to an 11, though it's iffy in some places.  For instance,
    I don't exactly "respect what is old" so much as appreciate it and
    my attitudes about expressing anger are more because of what I *don't*
    want to be (like my father) than what I feel is 'good.'  I'm well
    aware that I'm very selfish, so sacrificing for others would indeed
    make me a better person; on the other hand, I'm fully aware of the
    need for selfishness.
    
    My mother's approval was a lot more important to me in high school.
    Then I went halfway across the country (from Texas to New Hampshire)
    to go to college.  Independence was something I learned fast and
    thoroughly enjoyed.  Handling things on my own was something I took
    pride in.  Nowadays it's more a matter of course.
 | 
| 326.31 | Anything but that! | SLOVAX::HASLAM | Creativity Unlimited | Wed Dec 07 1988 15:55 | 4 | 
|  |     Oh-my-gawd!  I'm NOT a good girl.  *Whew!*  I wasn't even close--a
    perfect 0.  What if my husband finds out???;)
    
    Barb
 | 
| 326.32 |  | PACKER::WHARTON | Yah, Karen for President! | Wed Dec 07 1988 16:15 | 5 | 
|  |     re .31
    
    Naughty naughty!  
    
    I am not a good girl either. Please don't tell my mother.
 | 
| 326.33 | 8 | RAINBO::TARBET |  | Thu Dec 08 1988 11:45 | 4 | 
|  |     *woosh* I was gettin' worried there for a minute, but then everything
    stabilised.
    
    						=maggie
 | 
| 326.34 | all this in 25 years | IAMOK::KOSKI | If I ever get out of here... | Thu Dec 08 1988 12:23 | 6 | 
|  |     A grand total of 0, I was begining to think I was the only one,
    when I started reading the replys I was quite suprised to see the
    high scores. I guess the 0's are the independent type, I always
    have been.
    
    Gail
 | 
| 326.36 |  | SEDJAR::THIBAULT | It doesn't make sense. Isn't it | Thu Dec 08 1988 22:13 | 5 | 
|  | Well, I pulled a 3. My father says I've been pretty much independant since
the age of 3. But I think I'm mellowing in my old age...a few years ago I
would've come up with a negative number...
Jenna
 | 
| 326.37 | Speaking from personal experience... | SSGBPM::KENAH | Lifeblood, weeping from my eyes | Fri Dec 09 1988 09:57 | 5 | 
|  |     "Good Girl?"  A person (male or female) who gets a high score
    on this test isn't "Good" - she/he is a codependent, and that
    is *not* good.
    
    					andrew
 | 
| 326.38 | Would that it were never true ... | SQM::MAURER | Rest you merry | Fri Dec 09 1988 12:17 | 5 | 
|  |     Ah, but frequently in our society (in the past, sometimes today) a
    co-dependent woman is a "good girl".  All those independent women can
    be perceived as disturbing the status quo. 
                       
                       
 | 
| 326.40 |  | RAINBO::TARBET |  | Fri Dec 09 1988 13:38 | 9 | 
|  |     <--(.39)
    
    Eagle, "co-dependency" is psychologese for "a relationship in which the
    neurotic needs of the participants hook into one another, reinforcing
    the pathologies and reducing the possibility for anyone's growth"...it
    really has nothing to do with "interdependency", which is what most
    healthy relationships exhibit. 
    
    						=maggie
 | 
| 326.42 |  | RAINBO::TARBET |  | Fri Dec 09 1988 14:07 | 17 | 
|  |     um, did it sound as though I was trying to clip your wings, Eagle? That
    wasn't my intention, honest, if I sounded frosty please put it down to
    my irritation at the %$@#$% term itself:  "co-dependency" is a terrible
    term because practically everyone interprets it exactly as you did.
    It'd be *much* better to call it something relatively clear like
    "neurotic interdependence"
    
    Sure it tells us something to merely know the numbers:  that the woman
    reporting her score believes that she falls into a certain place on
    that scale, and (typically) that that outcome is/isn't expected. 
    
    As to discussing where we took the hits, I'd be willing to bet lunch
    that most of us took them in much the same places.  I can't recall
    offhand which mine were exactly (I'll look them up if you really want
    to know in detail) but they were all around "generic" self-worth. 
                                                  
                                              	=maggie
 | 
| 326.44 |  | STC::HEFFELFINGER | Aliens made me write this. | Sat Dec 10 1988 14:09 | 8 | 
|  |     	Well, I guessed that I would score below 10 even before I started
    the test.  So it's no surprise to me that I scored a 4.  
                                             
    	I'm 27.  I got zeros on all questions except 8,9,32,40 on which
    I got 1's.
                                                                  
    tlh
    
 | 
| 326.45 | I'm so bad, I'm good! | BLITZN::LITASI | Time and Tide | Sat Dec 10 1988 15:11 | 15 | 
|  |     
    	When I saw Vivian took this test and scored a 3, I thought
    	I could not top that.  I don't know anyone more independent
    	than Vivian (a compliment...Vivian!).  But alas, I scored
    	a 3 also.  I scored a 2 on 8 and a 1 on 19 (sometimes).
    
    	Looking back on #8, I think it's still true...I still would
    	like "my man" to be better, ideally, however, so few are
    	as perfect as I am :*)...
    
    	I've never been a "good girl" and never will be...  
    
    	It's not nearly as much fun as being bad :*)
    
    		sherry
 | 
| 326.46 |  | SEDJAR::THIBAULT | It doesn't make sense. Isn't it | Mon Dec 12 1988 11:02 | 23 | 
|  | re: < Note 326.39 by AERIE::THOMPSON "tryin' real hard to adjust..." >
>>   The feminist quest for greater independence (from men) is reaction
>>   to years of not having an equal partnership.  To seek total self-
>>   sufficiency is simply to carry the quest to an extreme that may
>>   not be any better than extreme dependency was for women before WWII.
Eagles,
	Dependance for me has absolutely nothing to do with feminism or
independance from men. And it's never actually been my goal, I simply grew 
up that way. Probably because my role models were 3 older brothers. I grew 
up, as they did, knowing that I would have to provide for myself when I grew 
up. It never occured to me that I would *need* a man to support me. It just 
seemed natural that I would have to be self-sufficient. But that doesn't 
mean I don't *want* a man in my life. My SO and I are partners but I don't
depend on him to support me...I do depend on him to be there as we walk thru
life however. But I got by 28 years of life pretty much on my own, and knowing
I could do it again if I had to gives me a sense of security I guess. It also
allows me to worry about other things (like upcoming mortgage payments..e gadz)
So I'm not *UNlearning* anything...I'm simply being me.
Jenna
 | 
| 326.47 | goody two shoes? | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | Golden days before they end | Mon Dec 12 1988 12:05 | 8 | 
|  |     I guess I'm not really very bad at all.  I got a 13 - a "high" score
    compared with most that have been reported.  It's also high for
    my age (39).  I got 13 1's and no 2's.  I don't necessarily *agree*
    with all of the ones I got a 1 on, but I answered honestly.  I got
    1's on questions, 2, 6, 7, 8, 10, 20, 22, 27, 29, 31, 32, 37 & 38.
    
    Lorna
    
 | 
| 326.48 | who am I really | NOETIC::KOLBE | The dilettante debutante | Mon Dec 12 1988 15:12 | 21 | 
|  | 
       I had a real problem when I read the questions here. I didn't
       tally up my score because it  depends on the difference between
       what I do as opposed to what I feel. The person I act like would
       get a low score (I once had a manager laugh at me when I asked to
       go to assertiveness training, he said if I was any more assertive
       my group wouldn't be able to handle it) but the person I FEEL
       like is a totally different animal, she got a really high score.
       I'm on my own, I'm surviving and doing well, I don't let people
       walk all over me. But as it says in the song I "break just like a
       little girl". Internally I can be racked with indecision and
       insecurity while outwardly I charge forward. I want someone who
       is strong and able to "take care of me" while I continue to do it
       on my own. My ex once accused me of wanting a "daddy" and in some
       ways (emotionally) that's true. Yet, at work, everyone sees me as
       a very strong person, I've been know to strike fear into the
       hearts of those I've argued with cause I'll tell what I think no
       holds barred.
       I feel like a spilt personality. liesl
 | 
| 326.49 |  | ULTRA::ZURKO | UI:Where the rubber meets the road | Mon Dec 12 1988 16:47 | 5 | 
|  | Liesl,
I think we're meant to answer about how we feel. Most of the questions were
phrased that way. And, of course, that's tougher.
	Mez
 | 
| 326.50 | Not good vs bad; girl vs woman! | DEMING::FOSTER |  | Tue Jan 03 1989 13:28 | 15 | 
|  |     I haven't tallied my score yet, but I feel the same way as .48.
    I know that if I went by actions vs feelings, I would get totally
    different scores. I'll tally later.
    
    But I wanted to point out. Everyone has gotten huffy about the word
    "good" in the question 'are you a "good girl"?' and replied with the 
    antonym of "bad".
    
    Why not consider that to score low probably means that you are a "good
    woman"? I think the kind of independence and development of personal
    values represented by a low score is far more a sign of maturity,
    especially in our society, than it is a measure of "goodness". 
                                                      
    'ren with her 2 cents...
    
 |