T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
231.1 | I agree! | JJM::ASBURY | | Thu Oct 06 1988 14:49 | 14 |
| Very Interesting! And I agree with much of what was in .0. In fact,
a couple of weeks ago, I was having a discussion about one of those
topics - use of profanity. I was talking to a fellow student in
one of my evening MBA classes at Babson College (Wellesley, MA).
Somehow, swearing at work was brought up. This fellow student, Brian,
claimed that swearing at work, if done at the right time, ie sparingly
and to make a strong point, could be very beneficial. It would tend
to cause the 'swearing manager' to be taken more seriously.
After some discussion, we agreed that this is less true for women
in business than for men.
-Amy.
|
231.2 | Profanity is not need, nor appreciated. | SUCCES::ROYER | Fidus Amicus | Thu Oct 06 1988 16:24 | 13 |
| Amy,
Swearing and profanity in my opinion are just crutches people use
when they cannot find the proper word to use in the situation.
In other words, the usage of language that is not proper is the
sign of a mental cripple, whether male or female.
No malice intended, just stating an opinion.
:-)
Dave
|
231.3 | use of language, indeed | TFH::MARSHALL | hunting the snark | Thu Oct 06 1988 17:47 | 14 |
| re .2:
> ...the usage of language that is not proper is the sign of a mental
> cripple, ...
> No malice intended, ...
These two statements are contradictory.
/
( ___
) ///
/
|
231.4 | | ULTRA::ZURKO | UI:Where the rubber meets the road | Thu Oct 06 1988 18:09 | 5 |
| I'd like to see the same survey on men, to have something to compare it against
(besides my personal experience).
I swear plenty.
Mez
|
231.6 | Is this going to be another rathole? | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | That was Zen; this is Dao | Fri Oct 07 1988 03:48 | 19 |
| � Swearing and profanity in my opinion are just crutches people
use when they cannot find the proper word to use in the situation. �
Sometimes the "profane" word *is* the "proper word to use in the
situation". So what do you do then?
� In other words, the usage of language that is not proper is the
sign of a mental cripple... �
By whose definition of propriety? You may believe that some words
are "improper", but I don't. So why should I be bound by your rules
of propriety?
Words is words. *Ideas* may be profane or smutty or whatever you
want to call it, but the words aren't. To me, there's no difference
between "feces" and "shit". We're talking about the same substance,
so why is one word acceptable and the other not?
--- jerry
|
231.7 | | HANDY::MALLETT | Foole | Fri Oct 07 1988 14:11 | 13 |
| I suspect that the idea behind the profanity question refers
more to regular or constant use those "nasty" words. My
experience tells me that for both men and women, the occasional
profanity doesn't undermine a professional image while regular
or constant usage does. Actually, from what I've seen in
Manufacturing,� a woman has a bit more leeway as profanity
from a woman is often interpretted by males as a sign of
"toughness", an attribute of great value in Mfg.
Steve
� admittedly, an, um, unusual place. . .
|
231.8 | and from the man in the know (so he sez) | NOETIC::KOLBE | The dilettante debutante | Fri Oct 07 1988 15:29 | 16 |
|
Concerning the dress code for aspiring pros...
In a recent article about J.T. Molloy (mr dress for sucess) he
stated that most recent fashion mags have been misleading women
saying that they may wear dresses to work and be respected. He
says this is only true of women dominated fields. Otherwise
ladies, you must suit up.
He also claims that dark colors are mandatory (and I wear pink
80% of the time, so much for my sucess). A quote from Molloy...
"Dark colors mean authority...that's why IBM executives and
Hell's Angels wear dark clothes".
liesl
|
231.9 | | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | That was Zen; this is Dao | Sat Oct 08 1988 04:58 | 14 |
| With regard to dress, I disagree with the idea of dressing for
the job one aspires to. It's far better to dress for the job
one is currently in.
Some years back, I had a woman working for me who seemed to
feel that "dressing up" was the way to go -- though I confess
that I'm not sure whether it was because she just liked dressing
up or she felt it would help her "get ahead". Regardless, a
fancy dress and high heels was *not* what I consider appropriate
dress for a computer operator (and, working third shift, she
wouldn't have had much of a chance to impress upper management
with her "professionalism").
--- jerry
|
231.10 | the job you're in | DOODAH::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Tue Oct 11 1988 14:33 | 13 |
| re: .9
Sounds like she probably just felt more comfortable dressing up.
I tend to agree about dressing for the job you're in now. If you
want to be taken seriously in an engineering environment as
someone with technical knowledge, you hadn't better wear anything
much fancier than a sweater and slacks. Someone, male or female,
who wore suits regularly would have to go several extra steps to
establish that he or she knew what she was talking about
technically and wasn't just spouting management jargon.
--bonnie
|