T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
203.1 | One 23 year old's view of things | TOOK::TWARREN | | Fri Sep 23 1988 15:18 | 42 |
| Interesting points! I also was born in 1965, and I expect to be
treated with respect and equality. This was often an issue with
me and my friends in college (I went to an all-woman's college),
and some of my friends felt that they never really felt that there
was an attitude that they were unequal, or inferior. They never
noticed it in sports in high school etc.
I come from what could be considered an unusual situation- where
both my parents worked, but my mother was the only and final say
in our household. I have never in my life asked permission from
my father to do anything, mom was and for that matter still is
the boss. Even my father gets permission from my mother. Granted
their relationship is anything but a marriage, but this was the
environment that I grew up in.
However, there are areas that I notice some inequalities -
some of them obvious, and some subtle. For example in high school
sports, our teams always got equipment etc, only after the football
team was budgeted. In college- when budget cuts came- only the
women's sports were affected. I had a few business professors who
basically had the attitude- women weren't really qualified to be
in the business arena, but I'll teach you anyways (what they were
doing teaching at a women's college I'll never know). And in often
times in relationships- I was always assumed to be the one who was
concerned about birth control (granted this is changing).
One thing that I think is interesting is that women our age are
not faced with the choice of working, it is no longer a choice but
rather a necessity. However evidence still exists today to that
age old view of women working in the home- if anyone followed the
Tamposi-Douglass political race, one of Douglas' supporters- NH
Senator Gorden Humphreys stated in so many words that Tamposi should
not be running for Congress because it will take time away from
her two young children.
Without further rambling though, I do agree that we have a level
of expectations to be treated fairly and equally.
Terri
|
203.2 | clarifying point in .1 | TOOK::TWARREN | | Fri Sep 23 1988 15:24 | 4 |
| I'd like to clarify that when I spoke about women's sports being
cut and not men's, I was speaking of colleges around me, where some
of my female friends programs were cut, and the extra money went
into football and men's soccer.
|
203.3 | | CADSE::SHANNON | look behind you | Fri Sep 23 1988 18:10 | 11 |
| Now this is an interesting point, myself and another person
who read this conference got thrashed when we though others were
being treated fairly, and when we thought that decisions should
be based on qualifications nothing else.
Here I see 2 people my age that felt they were brought up with out
being looked down upon cause they are women
I just find these comments interesting
mike
|
203.4 | on the contrary | TOOK::TWARREN | | Fri Sep 23 1988 18:37 | 25 |
| Mike-
I'd like to clarify that a bit. I agreed with .0 in the fact that
growing up I felt I did not feel as much of the "inequality" that
many speak about, but then again I think that has come from the
environment that I specifically was in, and also the fact that a
lot of the groundwork has been previously laid down through the
era of the 50's, 60's and 70's. However I also spoke about a few
of the things that I have noticed- and yes those things do exist!
Perhaps it was only through education and experience, and as the
author of .0 mentioned- getting past the view of life which didn't
extend past the "halls of high school", that I began noticing the
inequities.
Also note though, that the point of this discussion is not to say
that we feel that we were brought up without being looked down upon
cause we were women (getting into a kickball game as a kid was not
always easy, and fearing the label "she throws like a girl" was
certainly a serious concern), rather that it seems we now expect
to be treated equally, and expect to work as hard, compete with,
and not to delegate work according to sexes, just as much as our
male counterparts do.
Terri
|
203.5 | | FSLPRD::JLAMOTTE | The best is yet to be | Fri Sep 23 1988 19:03 | 9 |
| I graduated from high school in 1956 and I didfnot feel any inequality
in school.
The sad part is it never really hit me until I became a single
parent...it was there and it had chipped the armour a bit.
When you go out into the world and think everything is okay and
get these little jabs every now and again it takes awhile before
reality sinks in.
|
203.6 | | CADSE::SHANNON | look behind you | Sat Sep 24 1988 00:00 | 6 |
| I guess I have some questions i want toa sk but I have think about
the wording, again I want to see the point of view here, not to
make it into the rat holes we had before.
mike - with questions later
|
203.7 | A little light humor (VERY light) ;-) | WOODRO::FAHEL | Amalthea, the Silver Unicorn | Mon Sep 26 1988 09:35 | 11 |
| My husband and I have a running joke (no pun intended):
"That person runs like a girl"
"That's because she IS a girl"
"Oh"
Initiated by one or the other of us.
K.C.
|
203.8 | still around? | NSSG::ALFORD | another fine mess.... | Mon Sep 26 1988 10:28 | 17 |
|
re: back a couple.....no inequality in school in 1956....
Well, I graduated from high school in 1973, and there was
still tremendous inequality....
I couldn't take wood-working shop----girls took home-ec
I couldn't run for class president---had to be a boy....
the only girls sports was basketball--the guys had b'ball, football,
golf, and tennis.
etc, etc...
So, even a decade+ ago there was still discrimination in some
places. Note...this was in Tennessee....but that doesn't mean
it didn't happen elsewhere too.
deb
|
203.9 | 1956 | FSLPRD::JLAMOTTE | The best is yet to be | Mon Sep 26 1988 14:12 | 10 |
| My comment about 1956 read something like "I did not feel
that I had any limits" when I graduated from high school
in 1956. It was only when I started to live that I discovered
the limits I had because of my gender.
I was trying to compare my attitude in 1956 to the author of
the base note.
I must have been living in a vacuum!
|
203.10 | More... | CIMBAD::WALTON | | Mon Sep 26 1988 14:56 | 17 |
| Some clarification seems to be calle for.
I wanted to point out that my generation seems to be the first who
didn't have limitations placed upon them by society early on in
life and have to "overcome" those limitations.
I NEVER heard any gender classifications in either school or my
home when I was growing up. My periodic decisions to be either
an astronaut, fire fighter, or mommy were all met with the same
enthusiasm and noone told me or my friends "Wouldn't you rather
be a nurse, teacher, secretary, etc..."
Just another part of my observations.
Sue
|
203.11 | | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | That was Zen; this is Dao | Tue Sep 27 1988 03:11 | 11 |
| re:.8
� I couldn't take wood-working shop----girls took home-ec �
On the other hand, I couldn't take Home Ec -- boys took shop.
I'm sure it was more a matter of potential peer flack than
school rules, but up until the time I graduated high school
(1971), I'd not heard of a single boy who took Home Ec.
--- jerry
|
203.12 | | CADSE::SHANNON | look behind you | Tue Sep 27 1988 07:16 | 28 |
| Re: .0
Having gone to an all male high school, I never had to compete
with women academically, or ever noticed that there were was special
treatment for a male group over a female group, cause there weren't
any female groups. I did notice how certain sports teams like football
seemed to end up with better budgets than say the swimming team,
but that was cause people go to football games, no one ever came
to our swimming meets, but back to the subject.
Going to college was the first time since grammer school that
I actually had women in my classes. In my mind these women were
there like me to get engineering degrees. During my time there
I ended up being a very average student - read c's - the point I
am trying to make is since 1982 when I entered college I have
not seen women get the short end of the stick when it comes
to opportunities, I guess .0 says it best
> Consequently, I have always expected to be treated with respect
> and integrity for my abilities and accomplishments and have competed
> with everyone just as hard as they compete with me.
When I suggested that this is how everyone gets treated I got
bashed. I guess when I read this it seemed to be a fair statement.
Am I off base here?
mike
|
203.13 | Chef I | MURPHY::NOVELLO | | Tue Sep 27 1988 12:00 | 8 |
| Re: .11
At Waltham High School (early 70s), instead of Home Ec, they had a CHEF
class which was open to anyone. Anyone could sign up for the sewing
class, but no males ever did.
Guy Novello
|
203.14 | | 11SRUS::KRUPINSKI | John Wayne should sue for defamation | Tue Sep 27 1988 13:00 | 16 |
| I went to a Vo-tech (euphemism for "Trade School") instead of a
normal high school. Out of our 80 or so graduating class we had
1 female in Drafting* (included a half-year in the Machine shop),
4 in Beauty Culture, and about 10 in Health Service Occupations.
None of the males were in BC or HSO. The class after mine graduated
a female carpenter, and a male in beauty culture.
All the women took typing, while the men took blueprint reading
(except the woman in drafting). Personally, I'd rather have had
the typing. I don't recall there being a "Home Economics", and
I'd rather have had a little training there, rather than having
to teach myself how to cook.
Tom_K
* At first, I wrote "1 female draftsman", but I caught myself :-)
|
203.15 | Chicago was enlightened even then | BOLT::MINOW | Fortran for Precedent | Tue Sep 27 1988 15:18 | 8 |
| At my Chicago grammar school in 1952 (fifty-two), we had an all-in-one
shop/home ec/sewing class that *all* of the eight graders took. I sort-of
learned to sew, and we all learned enough plumbing to be able to change
a toilet valve.
How can it be that the rest of the country is still stuck in the dark ages?
Martin.
|
203.16 | Hooray for Chicago | VINO::EVANS | Never tip the whipper | Tue Sep 27 1988 15:28 | 10 |
| RE: .15
Wow! Martin, I am impressed! Changing toilet valves is *exactly*
the kind of thing we should be taught in such classes in school!
You can always buy clothes and go out to dinner, but plumbers
are *expensive*!!!
--DE
|
203.17 | sorry for the tangent | NSSG::ALFORD | another fine mess.... | Tue Sep 27 1988 15:34 | 18 |
|
Well, I didn't mean to get this note off on a tangent. Just tried
to say that not all folks in all places in the country have the
same opportunities in order to feel 'free to be anything'....
Don't get me wrong, I thought I could be anything I wanted, do anything
I wanted, and expected to be respected for what I did, but that
was NOT the norm for the girls I went to high school with.
I do think, hope at least, that my high school alma mater doesn't
do the same thing today. I'll have to talk with my niece who just
graduated from high school, about her experiences in the South,
to see if things have changed substantially. (sp?)
Oh well, as for the original note....I do truly hope that all young
women have your expectations, and feel comfortable with performing
any job, and demanding the respect they deserve. That would be
a giant step forward! Guess I'm too old ! .... sigh.....
|
203.18 | my $.02 | JJM::ASBURY | | Wed Sep 28 1988 14:36 | 20 |
| re: .0
I, too, was born in 1965. And I did much of my growing up in a single
parent home. My mom was the mother and the father. I've been hearing
forever that I can do whatever I want, I mean there were no gender
based arguments for studying or doing one thing or another. And I
guess that I was so matter-of-fact AND at the same time, very solid
in my opinion that this-is-the-way-it-is that very few people have
ever tried to tell me differently.
re: home ec -vs- shop
My year was the first when they decided that everyone should take
home ec (cooking AND sewing) AND shop (woodworking and metal shop).
It was great! I had a lot of fun in both, although I already knew
how to cook and sew (having been making the family's dinner and
making handicraft gifts for many years). And I loved shop class
as well.
-Amy.
|
203.19 | not a representative sample? | DOODAH::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Wed Sep 28 1988 14:51 | 21 |
| I suspect that the phenomenon you note isn't so much a factor of
age as it is of the DEC population not being representative of
society at large.
Everyone responding to this note works for a large high-tech
corporation. We're not all engineers or programmers, but we all,
from temporary secretaries to principal hardware engineers, had to
compete against other people to get the job we've got, and a great
many of us have already made quite a lot of progress in those
jobs, or we expect to in the near future.
Obviously we don't have too many deep-seated feelings of
incompetence, fears of failure, or beliefs we should stick to
women's work, whatever that is, or we wouldn't be here in the
first place. The women who were discouraged from following
professions, who were discriminated against and held in low-paying
jobs, are not, on the whole, working for high-tech companies these
days. Too many of them have given up. Too many of them gave up
long before they even gave it a chance.
--bonnie
|
203.20 | Better .neq. Acceptable | FRAGLE::TATISTCHEFF | Lee T | Wed Sep 28 1988 19:42 | 30 |
| re .19 good point bonnie (though I'd question the part about fear
of failure and insecurities - the high acheivers I know are often
terrified of failure and have extremely high standards thus setting
themselves up to "fail" rather regularly. but we can continue this
otherwhere if you'd like to pursue it)
One of my best friends in high school (1980-81) came from a blue
collar family and went to the local public tech school. She was
"learning computers" (data entry). Her father beat her and her
mother. Her mother beat her. The love of her life beat her. The
only way for her to escape her home environment that was acceptable to
her socio-economic group (fancy way of saying her neighborhood,
family, friends) was for her to marry. [she's turned out really
well, despite the horrible hand life dealt her: got rid of the abusive
boyfriend without permanent injury, moved out of the home to live
BY HERSELF, and later met a sweet gentle guy]
I am 25 and was raised to believe that I could do anything. I went
to an excellent technical school, despite my parents being broke,
and already have a higher standard of life than that with which
I was raised.
Thus my adamance about sexism; the first big incident was like a
bazooka in the face: outlandish, ridiculous, sheer lunacy,
outrageously neanderthal, and terrifying. Later incidents were
yet more severe and threatening to my well-being.
Yes, things are better. Nevertheless, they remain enormously unjust.
Lee
|
203.21 | | COGMK::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Fri Sep 30 1988 16:40 | 15 |
| Mom's up for a visit and I mentioned the discussion to her. I said
I couldn't remember being told that I would eventually marry and
have a man take care of me. She said that none of the women in
her family were told that. They were all expected to get an education
so they could take care of themselves. In general, though, I'd
say that attitude is more common these days.
Re: high school
In small-town Georgia, near Atlanta (Duluth, in Gwinnett County,
for anyone who's been there), my older brother was in 6th grade.
Everyone took 6 week samplers of the electives offered: 6 weeks
of typing, 6 weeks of home ec (mostly cooking, I think), etc. I
thought that was a good way to work things. We moved before to
Texas that year, so I never got to try out for myself.
|
203.22 | Believe in yourself or lose your dreams. | HPSCAD::TWEXLER | | Sun Nov 06 1988 12:16 | 19 |
| I was born in 1965 and when I was just four years old, I came home from
kindergarten one day and told my mother that I'ld like to be a nurse. My
mom, of course, wasn't going to argue me out of it if I wanted to be a
nurse, but she was curious. "Why a nurse?" she asked.
And, I told her that I *did not* really want to be a nurse. I really
wanted to be a doctor, but that all the kids in my kindergarten class told
me that only boys could be doctors. And, I remember to this day the
intense feelings of indignation I had when mom explained to me that if I
wanted, I could, indeed, become a doctor.
I don't doubt that that experience has helped me. When I would hear that
girls can't do math, I would just think of those kindergarten children and how
early one can get socialized to believing something... or not. And, let
me tell you, I heard that crap from a few (male) students when I was in
engineering school! One fellow student said this to *me*! And I'm most
definitely female and I can most definitely handle math!
Tamar
|
203.23 | but women CAN"T do math.... | CYRUS::DRISKELL | | Mon Nov 07 1988 17:48 | 21 |
| Tamar,
One night when we were going home from the pub (at university),
one of my friends explained to me why women can't do math. All
very serious, all very logical, for a 15 minute drive. I went along
with it, thinking it is a put on, till he said he's not sexist or
anything, that's just the way it is. After I picked myself up off
the ground, I asked, what about me???
He said that's ok, I'm different. I never did figure out if I'm
the exception that proves the rule or just some freak of nature,,
not quite female, ya know, she does *math*.
He held to his views several times over the next year, usually as
he was copying my diffy q or linear algebra homework.
The biggest problem is,, he's not the only adult with this view.
Just one of the few willing to admit it.
mary
|
203.24 | math, eh? | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Tue Nov 08 1988 12:14 | 25 |
| Math, eh? Well, I did calculus tutoring part-time when I was working
my way through college. I don't think it would occur to many people
(men, I mean) to me what I "can't do" when they see me doing whatever
it is (short of being a sperm donor!); don't laugh but it is one of the
advantages of being taller than the average American man, let alone
woman: people find it hard to "look down on you" if they have to look
up at you! Of course, I can't help being tall; my whole family is
tall, and sometimes that is a nuisance (you all know what I think about
shopping for clothes! - of course, I save money since I can't impulse
buy things even if I felt like it since they would be way too short!)
Well, actually, there was my ex-father-in-law, an old, bad-tempered,
blue-collar French Canadian man. He didn't think women could do math,
but then, he couldn't do math either. I didn't pay much attention to
his arcane opinions on stuff other than to try to avoid his anger (his
temper was worse than my ex's - no one in that family was ever taught
to control their temper anyhow...I'm glad to be out of there!). I was
sort of marginally OK in his book since I kept my mouth shut most of
the time (like his wife - she wouldn't even converse with you if he was
in the room, because if she did he would trounce her) and knit sweaters
for his son, darned socks, etc. (yes, I can do those things too....my
mother is a musician and mathematician who also darns socks).
/Charlotte
|
203.25 | | CSG001::ROSENBLUH | | Tue Nov 08 1988 13:54 | 15 |
|
Ahem....
There is a standard reply to men who make speeches about why women
can't do math. Just look the guy straight in the cro...I mean eye, and
tell him .....
.
.
.
.
"The reason women can't do math is because all their
lives they've been told that *that* [at this point
indicate a span between your thumb and first finger]
is six inches."
|
203.26 | Aha, so THAT'S it! | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Wed Nov 09 1988 16:07 | 10 |
| re .25
Cathy (I think that's you, right?), you're onto something! I just
measured the span between my right thumb and first finger (well, I am
right-handed), and it is 7 1/2 inches! I don't have a long enough
ruler in my cube to see if the distance from my nose to the end of my
outstretched arm is a yard, though!
;-)
/Charlotte
|
203.27 | | CSG::ROSENBLUH | | Wed Nov 09 1988 16:47 | 10 |
| Hi Charlotte. Yup it's me (Kathy).
You do realize the span you should be indicating when (if) you
tell this joke should be considerably \*LESS*/ than 6 inches - right?
(By the way, for me to get a 7-1/2" span I have to go from my thumb to
my little finger. Have you considered taking up pro piano playing for a
living? All the travel you want, it pays better than software engineering,
and it sounds like you would have a natural advantage - a key-span to beat
Rubinstein's!)
|
203.28 | no musical talents here! | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Wed Nov 09 1988 17:13 | 18 |
| Someone already sent me mail saying that the thumb-to-first-finger
gambit is the punchline of some joke - I'm dense that way; I don't
react to most jokes! It's a big distance on my big hands.
My mother always hoped that I would decide to become a cellist,
because, with my long fingers, I could play one with the violin
fingering, apparently a big advantage if your fingers are long enough
(although my little fingers are very, very short, as is true of
everyone in my father's family). However, I turned out to be tone-deaf
like my dad (who had other fine qualities, however!) rather than
musical like my mother's people, so that never panned out. My mother
plays the viola, mostly, although she plays several other instruments
too - semi-professional even now that she is retired.
/Charlotte, again
PS - I never look at a man below the shoulder level; it embarrasses
them so! I wish men would do the same.
|
203.29 | another twenty-three-er | 2EASY::PIKET | | Tue Dec 06 1988 13:07 | 41 |
|
Getting back to the original topic, I was also born in 1965, so
I definitely (as usual) have a few thoughts.
I was raised in a non-sexist environment so it is hard to say how
much of my attitude came from that home environment and how much
of it was around me at school, but basically it was always my
assumption that I could do anything a male could do. I recall a
couple of instances when I became extremely indignamt when that
assumption was challenged.
When I was, I believe, in 6th grade (1975-76) I was furious because
there was a boy's basketball team for the six-graders, but no girl's
team. Guess what? The girls got to be cheerleaders! Only one other
girl and myself declined that honor. A couple of girls and I tried
to start a team, but it came to nothing. Even thinking about it
now I get furious. I hope to God they've changed that policy. Maybe
the next time I go home (my mother still has a house a block from
school) I will look in at the gym.
At about age 13, I had been in my town's Little League for 2 years.
At a certain age, you went into a different division of the league.
When I went to register I was told that they didn't allow girls
into that division "for insurance reasons". I cried all the way
home, but my mother gently consoled me by telling me that if worse
came to worse, we would call up the ACLU! We called some higher
ups in the league first, and eventually someone got back to us stating
that there was no such rule against girls playing. When I went
back to register, there was a handwritten sign on the blackboard
congratulating me (by name!) for being the first girl in the senior
division!
I think things are better now than they used to be, and I believe
(present politics aside) they will be better still for my kids.
Just thinking about having been through those experiences makes
me feel old. To expand this topic, I would be curious as to what
parents of CURRENT grade school and high school children have to
say about their kids experiences with opportunities in school such
as sports, shop, etc.
Roberta
|
203.30 | | ULTRA::ZURKO | UI:Where the rubber meets the road | Wed Dec 07 1988 08:09 | 9 |
| > To expand this topic, I would be curious as to what
> parents of CURRENT grade school and high school children have to
> say about their kids experiences with opportunities in school such
> as sports, shop, etc.
Me too. And, of course, the traditionally _female_ areas as well (cheerleading,
home ec, etc., for boys).
Mez
|
203.31 | Medway, MA results | DMGDTA::WASKOM | | Wed Dec 07 1988 11:43 | 20 |
|
Well, our local junior high requires boys to take both cooking and
sewing, and girls to take shop.
High school sports - boys only for football (appropriate in my
opinion), soccer (I wish it were a big enough school for a girl's
soccer team, but don't REALLY want girls on the boy's team) and
I believe baseball and basketball. Both sexes have track programs,
cross country died this year 'cause no one went out. Girls only
for volleyball and field hockey. The school is in my opinion small
(400 in the student body total), and I think this skews the
opportunities. My son wants to play volleyball in the winter -
but it's only a fall sport and soccer is his first love. There
was a boy on the field hockey team this year, I believe he got to
be manager (ie, didn't actually play).
Personal opinion - it's improving, but there's still a long way
to go.
|