T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
139.2 | Yes, and no... | AKOV12::MILLIOS | I grok. Share water? | Fri Aug 26 1988 12:11 | 22 |
| re: .1
I disagree - I don't think that he's being a poop for not taking
it down when asked.
He should not have been "picked on" to take the thing down. If
Donna didn't like it, then she should tell him so, but not become
upset when he doesn't.
The reading of Playboy, Penthouse, etc. is an extension of the same
issue that Donna doesn't like.
Fantasies are normal, and *should* be encouraged. (Take this with
a large grain of salt, no flames please.)
What .1 said, I rephrase, since it's the *exact same argument* that
I use when my S.O. (whoever that may be at the time) mentions that
I seem to spend a lot of time looking at other women:
"If I look at them, and spend my time with you, what does that say?"
Bill
|
139.3 | Nah, he's normal! | AIMHI::SCHELBERG | | Fri Aug 26 1988 12:24 | 16 |
| Donna I wouldn't worried about it - it's not like it's his
ex-girlfriend or something!!!! I mean if you think about it don't
you know some woman or man who does the same thing? I know my brother
still has Farrah Fawcett up on his wall and he dates other girls
(I don't think he'll get close to Farrah) and my husband teases
me about Robert Redford all the time. I don't even have a picture
of him but I *love* seeing all his movies!!!!!
I think Dr. Brothers did an article about this and she says it's
perfectly harmless and to keep dwelling on it will only push your
husband away from you.....
Take Care,
Bobbi
|
139.4 | perfect spouse? | ULTRA::LARU | put down that ducky | Fri Aug 26 1988 12:25 | 10 |
| Donna,
Are you willing to change your behavior to please your husband?
Is that the deal that you have worked out? That you will each
be exactly what the other desires, and will eliminate all
behavior that displeases the other?
bruce
|
139.5 | | COGMK::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Fri Aug 26 1988 12:41 | 7 |
| Re: .0
Maybe it would help if you could explain just what it is that bothers
you so much. Do you feel that he has some kind of attachment to
the woman in the picture? Do you feel that his interest reflects
a disinterest in you? Do you think that his refusal to remove the
picture reflects a lack of concern for your feelings?
|
139.6 | Another Opinion | ATPS::GREENHALGE | Mouse | Fri Aug 26 1988 12:58 | 16 |
|
I've always kept pictures of an old boyfriend up (and carry one
in my wallet) ever since he committed suicide 3 1/2 years ago.
My husband was always very insecure. But, I never realized *how*
insecure he was until one night, out of the blue, he said I loved
Skip more than I loved him.
Well, my first reaction was, 'where did that come from?' and 'why?'.
My response to him was it didn't really matter who I loved more
because (1) I was married to him and (2) Skip was dead and therefore,
no threat to him. The pictures are still there, and there hasn't
been any question since.
Try not making a mountain out of mole hill.
|
139.7 | | TSECAD::HEALY | | Fri Aug 26 1988 13:21 | 6 |
|
Not trying to offend, but, you are sounding terribly insecure
and being compulsive. I realize its easier said than done, but
try and get over it.
|
139.8 | Clarify the Issues | PRYDE::ERVIN | | Fri Aug 26 1988 14:04 | 37 |
| I don't think that the picture of Kathy Ireland is the real issue
here, but it serves as a tangible symptom of a larger problem, perhaps.
The other replies seem to focus on 'the picture' and say that you
should not make a big deal about 'the picture'. However, it seems
that the issue of not much affection in your marriage has just been
skipped over. Perhaps if there was a lot of passion and affection
'the picture' would have absolutely no significance. However, in
the context of a marriage where you are maybe not having all your
intimacy needs met, the picture can become the focus. It's easier
to talk about a picture on a wall than what is or is not happening
in one's bedroom.
If my lover was not very affectionate with me, I'm not sure I would
doubt her love, but I would think that there were problems with
the relationship that would need to be addressed. Although, given
this society to equate measures of love with sexual frequency and
amounts of affection, I can see where we can easily correlate lack
of affection as grounds for doubting our partner's love.
Would your husband be willing to go to couples' therapy? Are you
willing to go to couples' therapy? You can either focus on 'the
picture' or take an open look at what is really bothering you about
the relationship and decide from there. The choice is yours.
I recognize that I'm making some assumptions here that you and your
husband may not feel comfortable talking about intimacy or that
there are needs of yours/his that are not being met in the
relationship. Although, one person cannot fulfill all our needs,
I think that there are some basic needs that a committed, intimate
relationship should meet. I sincerely hope that my making assumptions
has not offended you. One of my backgrounds is as a trained therapist,
another is as a certified teacher, and another yet as an application
software techie. I will send the therapist persona home now.
I hope you can find a resolution that you feel comfortable with.
|
139.9 | Looking past the picture | AIMHI::SCHELBERG | | Fri Aug 26 1988 14:26 | 13 |
| Hmmm.....re:8 is right if it's not the picture but your focusing
on the picture then I would have to say you have to look at yourself
more closely and see what is really bothering you. If it's more
than that then I think you have to really open up to your husband
and tell him.
Some people find it terribly hard to be affection......or intimate
if your husband is from a dysfunctional family you may want to look
into counseling to help both of you.
Good Luck
|
139.10 | | HPSRAD::MARKS | | Fri Aug 26 1988 14:32 | 15 |
| RE: .5
I feel all of the above
RE: 8
I think you have a point, if Paul came to me and said that he loved
me and thought I was pretty I might feel diffferently but instead
he calls me stupid, a jerk, why don't I shut-up etc.
He claims he's just not an affectionate person and doesn't know how
to show his feelings, I think he right.
Donna
|
139.11 | R-E-S-P-E-C-T! | IAMOK::KOSKI | It's in the way that you use it | Fri Aug 26 1988 14:52 | 10 |
| It sounds as though his attitude toward you is alot more than just
not showing affection toward you! By the sounds of it he is using
some very humiliating laguage with you. I would say this is a whole
different ballgame from not showing enough affection.
Please go with the counseling advice! This man lacks basic respect
toward you.
Gail
|
139.12 | | ATPS::GREENHALGE | Mouse | Fri Aug 26 1988 17:02 | 19 |
|
re: .0
I have to agree with .7. It does sound as though your insecurities
have gotten the better of you.
The point I wanted to make in my last reply was that the insecure
feelings my husband already felt were emphasized by a picture of
one of my old boyfriends, now dead, and not an issue.
Affection. He received plenty, but did not know how to return
it. Sometimes I found it difficult but, for the most part, I was
always very sure of him.
If you feel like you need more affection than you receive now,
have you told this to Paul? If not, talk to him about it. Tell
him what affection "means to you". And try to forget the picture.
Beckie
|
139.13 | | WORDS::KRISTY | Certified Hug Therapist | Fri Aug 26 1988 20:21 | 10 |
| Could it also be the "he hid it from me (all the other pictures
of this woman)" that is helping it hurt. One picture isn't too much
of a big deal (Paul *is* a poop for not respecting his wife's wishes
about taking the picture down when she asked the first time). Finding
out a much larger piece of the picture when you (general 'you')
thought is was a small thing can really blow a person's mind and
bring out a lot of not-too-pleasant feelings. If you hold a strong
sense of trust in your mate and that gets shattered, it takes a
long (and I mean LONG) time to regain that level of trust and respect
for that person.
|
139.14 | The outside world is a mirror | YODA::BARANSKI | Searching the Clouds for Rainbows | Mon Aug 29 1988 03:12 | 9 |
| "The other replies seem to focus on 'the picture' and say that you should not
make a big deal about 'the picture'. However, it seems that the issue of not
much affection in your marriage has just been skipped over."
Good Point!!
Often problems inside are reflected outside so that they can be seen.
JMB
|
139.15 | Lack of respect is it | RATTLE::MONAHAN | | Mon Aug 29 1988 09:14 | 23 |
| In *my* opinion:
I think your husband is lacking respect for you - big time. First
of all, you asked that he take down a picture of another woman.
He didn't do that. He knows that it makes you feel unhappy but
he still leaves it hanging up. If you received the affection that
you need maybe the picture wouldn't really matter to you. But because
you lack T.L.C. the issue over the picture is bothering you.
Second, he uses harsh words towards you and that can be why you
may feel insecure. You don't need someone verbally abusing you
the way he seems to. I think you should talk to him and let him
know how you feel about the way he talks to you. Ask him why he
speaks to you in this way. Ask him if he's unhappy with you for
some reason. There's got to be a reason why he speaks to you the
way that he does.
I would stand up for myself and not take his verbal attacks any
longer. Nobody needs that hanging over them.
I hope everything works out for you.....
Denise
|
139.17 | | GOSOX::RYAN | Somedays the bear will eat you | Mon Aug 29 1988 13:12 | 26 |
| Gee, my fianc�e has more pictures of other men than of me in
her cubicle, should I be worried:-).
Seriously, Kathy Ireland isn't the problem, this is:
> he calls me stupid, a jerk, why don't I shut-up etc.
>
> He claims he's just not an affectionate person and doesn't know how
> to show his feelings, I think he right.
When he calls you those things, he *is* showing his feelings.
And, as has already been pointed out, he is showing no respect
for you. This is the issue you have to deal with (or, more
accurately, get him to deal with). I'll leave it to those
who've been there to recommend specific avenues (counselling,
etc.), but it sounds like the one thing you need to do for
yourself is recover some self-esteem, and recognize that not
only is he wrong to insult you like that, but that his
accusations (stupid etc.) are factually wrong, that you are
*not* stupid, a jerk, etc. Just in two notes we can see that
you express yourself articulately, and you can use NOTES
competently (better than a lot of people I've seen:-). Please
try to recognize that the picture he is trying to paint of you
does not reflect reality.
Mike
|
139.18 | | HPSRAD::MARKS | | Mon Aug 29 1988 14:55 | 15 |
| Of course there is more to the picture than just the picture. I
am not insecure or compulsive. I have always done my best to respect
the feelings of the ones I love and feel in return they should respect
mine.
I am not a demanding person, but if my feelings are hurt for whatever
reason I expect my feelings to be respected or compromised
with and not sh*t on because he doesn't like what I have to say.
I had a picture of Tony Eason and Paul told me he didn't like it
so I threw it out. No big deal as far as I was concerned, he didn't
like it so I respected his feelings and threw it out - was I wrong?
Donna
|
139.19 | somebody's more equal... | ULTRA::LARU | put down that ducky | Mon Aug 29 1988 15:26 | 8 |
| ah... [some of] the rest of the story...
it seems to me that you two are playing by different rules
and i now agree that you have a definite grievance...
I can only suggest that you talk it out and agree what
you each can live with.
bruce
|
139.20 | Donna's being reasonable | ISTG::HARRIS | | Tue Aug 30 1988 12:17 | 15 |
| Some man said that he tells his SO, "Sure, I have pictures of other
women, but I stay with you." Of course he does--Christie Brinkley
(or whoever) wouldn't go out with him anyway! Maybe Donna feels
that if her husband could have Kathy Ireland, he'd leave Donna. She
feels like she is being used as a substitute. (Of course, as someone
else pointed out, if she believed that her husband loved and respected
her unconditionally, she probably wouldn't have these doubts.)
Why is it that when women express their fears or worries in these
notes, so many people pounce on them and tell them to lighten up?
Donna, I, for one, can certainly understand why your husband's refusal
to take down the picture bothered you.
Nomi
|
139.21 | | AKOV12::MILLIOS | I grok. Share water? | Tue Aug 30 1988 13:47 | 21 |
| re: .20
"some *man*"... That was a little hard, but I'll not be the one
to pounce on innuendoes, especially here... (Peace, as vivian says!)
I didn't say I TOLD her that. If you'll glance back to .2, you'll
see that it's a question....
If she gets the point that I'm trying to make, namely being that
if I really wanted to spend my time with her, and she trusted that,
then the picture wouldn't matter.
If, however, there are doubts, and the picture is merely fueling
this type of thing, then something would be done. I'm not saying
I'd buckle under, and rip down the calendar that my grandmothers
brought back from Hawaii for me (yes, my *grandmothers* give me
these things - and they're female, like most Gmothers! :^). I'm
saying that her pointing to the picture would merely indicate some
kind of larger problem, which *does* seem to be the case here.
Bill
|
139.23 | ditto | ULTRA::ZURKO | UI:Where the rubber meets the road | Tue Aug 30 1988 16:14 | 5 |
| > he calls me stupid, a jerk, why don't I shut-up etc.
Tell him in no uncertain terms that such language is off limits.
|
139.24 | | HPSRAD::MARKS | | Wed Aug 31 1988 11:35 | 14 |
| When I entered my original note it was the following day and I was
so upset about the picture I couldn't focus on anything else.
I know Paul and I have problems just like everyone else, unfortunately
there is no one perfect relationship. We really do work on our
problems maybe the communication isn't as good as it should be because
we both tend to bottle things up until we explode and that's usually
when we get things resolved.
I'm basically secure about myself, but I do know one thing - I look
nothing like Kathy Ireland and yes that does bother me.
Donna
|
139.25 | | HPSRAD::MARKS | | Wed Aug 31 1988 11:38 | 5 |
| P.S. RE: .20 Thanks, I agree! I'm sure if Paul could have Kathy
Ireland - he would.
Donna
|
139.26 | | WORDS::KRISTY | Certified Hug Therapist | Wed Aug 31 1988 13:11 | 9 |
| Digging way back to the beginning of the replies, the person who
said "Well, it's always me he comes home to." It doesn't do much
for the woman/lady/gal/whatever's esteem to have 'her man' coming
home to her to use her body while he fantasizes about some other
gal. While I agree fantasy is normal, there is a limit. If you
aren't satisfied with what you got, the fantasy is really demolished
when the reality of who you're actually with steps in and that
sometimes leads to even more problems between a couple.
|
139.27 | My man loves me | WOODRO::FAHEL | Amalthea, the Silver Unicorn | Wed Aug 31 1988 16:39 | 8 |
| My man does not "use my body", and that is a dumn phrase, anyway!
I still don't see what is wrong with just looking. I don't think
of it as substitution, I think of it as all women being a field
of flowers. He picked me, but can still look at others. (Sorry
for the dumb metaphor, but it fits.) You can't say that you don't
look at other men, can you?
K.C.
|
139.28 | You BET he'd take her if he could! | CSSE::CICCOLINI | | Wed Aug 31 1988 16:42 | 40 |
|
Exactly, Kristy! When a man says to me, "But it's YOU I'm dating",
while he drools and slavers over someone else, it just means to me
he's willing to take what he can get - something I already suspected!
When a man accepts priviledges to your body it does NOT automatically
mean he "loves" you more than anyone else. It means he's willing
to accept priviledges to your body. Amen.
When he slavers over someone else's body, (and it IS her body since
he doesn't know her mind or her character or any of those other
things he SO appreciates in you!), I can only assume he's dreaming
of HER priviledges and the men she's giving them to and wishing he were
one of them.
And because women were raised to believe their looks are their only
attractant for men, other women's looks are indeed a threat to female
security. Your man not only reminding you of this but rubbing your
nose in it, (calling you a jerk, refusing to take your feelings
seriously), is not only a threat but an insult. Moreso because
his "offense", (as in, "I'm not wrong, you're a jerk"), is proof
that he's on the defensive - that he does indeed know.
It's a power play, pure and simple. He's married. He feels he's
"given" you that. In return for him having to give up playing the
big stud, he's going to do this. You're feelings aren't really
seen by him as your real feelings but as an attempt to further remove
him from his "maleness" which in our culture is defined as the ability
to satisfy many beautiful women. This picture represents to him the
women he cannot have BECAUSE OF YOU. Surely he does need to grow up
and realize that one takes a vow because of ONESELF and not to do
the other a favor. It seems his fidelity was given to you before he
truly understood what he was giving.
Give him credit for hanging in through what must be a very common male
crisis. But then give him hell for trying to make you pay the price
of his vow.
|
139.29 | | RANCHO::HOLT | I came, I saw, I threw up... | Wed Aug 31 1988 16:55 | 4 |
|
I see men are *still* slime.....
Nice to know someone has us all figured out!
|
139.30 | | NEBVAX::PEDERSON | Keep watching the SKIES! | Wed Aug 31 1988 17:14 | 21 |
| re: .28
a question: Do you think ALL people (male or female) who
fantasize and are married are basically
only with their spouse because they couldn't get their
elusive fantasy person???? I certainly hope not. Fantasy
is NORMAL in relationships; I do it, my hubby does it, and
so do millions of other people. I agree, the author of .0
is getting a raw deal from the relationship she's in. Paul
is not respecting her feelings here or elsewhere in the relationship
(from what i can gather). But please do not put down fantasies!
I have read "My Secret Garden" and that book has allowed me to
feel like I'm not the only person here.
Sometimes my hubby and I kid each other with our "fanatsy people",
but he's true blue to me and vise versa.
As we say (here's another quip for you K.C.):
"even tho you're on a diet, you can still look at the menu"
pat
|
139.33 | | CSSE::CICCOLINI | | Wed Aug 31 1988 18:04 | 24 |
|
No, I do not believe all married people who fantasize are basically
only with their spouse because they couldn't get their elusive fantasy
person.
But of course, that wasn't the question I was answering so how could
you take my answer and assume it applies to this new question??
And Bob, if YOU think what I said means men are slime, that's you.
I don't happen to think so. I think men are men. Jes' guys. I
didn't place ANY value judgement on the guy who would dump a real
woman for a cheescake cutie, YOU did! I don't think it's slime. I think
it's normal. I don't blame them for "appreciating" what other men
have put together FOR them to appreciate! Our society says, "real
men seek sex with THESE kinds of women and often". I don't blame
them for posting pictures that say to the world, "I am a REAL man.
See? I like THIS!"
The guy in question is letting his "proof of manhood" come before
his wife's feelings by denying they are feelings in the first place
and seeing them instead as emasculation. That's not slime, that's
pathetic in the same way as a woman who is waiting to get married
instead of getting a job. It's what we learn, it's what some actually
do.
|
139.34 | Didn't I Read This..Didn't I Read This.. | FDCV16::ROSS | | Wed Aug 31 1988 18:10 | 5 |
| RE: .32 and .33
Sandy, for a minute I thought I was suffering from diplopia.
Alan
|
139.36 | ~/~ | RANCHO::HOLT | I came, I saw, I threw up... | Wed Aug 31 1988 19:11 | 2 |
|
guess I don't know a compliment when I hear one...
|
139.38 | it sure sounded profound to me... | RANCHO::HOLT | I came, I saw, I threw up... | Wed Aug 31 1988 20:15 | 4 |
|
re -.1
yeah, uh.. er... hmmmm...
|
139.39 | try this | BPOV02::MACKINNON | | Thu Sep 01 1988 09:14 | 31 |
|
Donna,
I know this is going to sound strange, but you might want to try
it. Have a picture taken of you in one of his favorite outfits.
It may be one of his shirts or it may be a racy nighty. There are
several studios in the boston area that specialize in what is
called "beaudoir" (sp?) photography. They are generaly run by
women photographers. One of my friends did this for her fiance
as a wedding gift. He flipped!! Mind you she does not have a
movie star figure or face, but the picture came out wonderful.
He may not want to display it at work, but he'll certainly look
at it and you in a more different light. The Goodday show on
channel 5 had a segment on this a couple of months ago. You may
want to give them a call and they may be able to direct you to
a photographer.
I know how you feel. My boyfriend has a picture of his him , his
ex and their daughter prominently displayed in his apartment.
He knows it bothers me, but he claims that it is for his
daughters sake. He wants her to know that he still recognizes
her mother even though they are no longer involved with each other.
Even though he knows it bothers me, he keeps it up. That annoys
me, but it is still me who he comes home to not her. Yes you do
have a right to be angry with him, but don't make it a major issue.
Try the picture, you may be surprised with his reaction and you
probably will be ecstatic with how it makes you look.
Take care,
Michele
|
139.40 | try here | BPOV02::MACKINNON | | Thu Sep 01 1988 09:18 | 7 |
|
re. -1
Here is the name of one of the places mentioned on the show.
Dogan Photography (beaudoir photography) 617-784-4456
|
139.41 | | NEBVAX::PEDERSON | Keep watching the SKIES! | Thu Sep 01 1988 09:31 | 19 |
| re: .32,.33
Please re-read your 3rd paragraph from .28 (sorry, guys, I don't
know how to pull in text from another note...). I believe this
refers to FANTASIES with other people. Or am I completely
misinterprepting this statement?!
re: 34
Checked my trusty-dusty american heritage dictionary and
couldn't find "diplopia". What does it mean?
re: .37
sounds alot like the system I used in college.....
PRIK (Personal Rating Indicator Key). I regularly dumped
an 82 for an 89. Didn't EVERYONE use one of these??!!
(please note smilies here)
|
139.42 | explaination | WMOIS::B_REINKE | As true as water, as true as light | Thu Sep 01 1988 09:50 | 6 |
| in re .41 in re .34 in re .32 and .33
Alan was making a humorous reference (i.e. double vision) to the
fact that Sandy's note was entered twice.
Bonnie
|
139.43 | From Reading Too Many Medical Dictionaries | FDCV03::ROSS | | Thu Sep 01 1988 09:52 | 11 |
| RE: .41
> re: 34
> Checked my trusty-dusty american heritage dictionary and
> couldn't find "diplopia". What does it mean?
Diplopia ----> Seeing double (not to be confused with "nystagmus" -
the uncontrollable rolling of the eyes) :-)
Alan
|
139.44 | | HPSRAD::MARKS | | Thu Sep 01 1988 10:36 | 14 |
| RE: .39 A friend of mine suggested the same thing. I heard it
was expensive...
Actually I dropped the issue with Paul the night I found the second
picture, but I still had a hard time dealing with my feelings.
I told him the night I discovered the second picture that I didn't
care anymore, if the pictures mean that much to him - keep them.
Well, he ripped up the one I found and the other - I don't know.
I'm not sure what I'm feeling anymore, but I do know that I don't
like my husband having pictures of another women.
Donna
|
139.45 | | LEZAH::BOBBITT | invictus maneo | Thu Sep 01 1988 11:11 | 16 |
| an ex of mine (of course, this had nothing to do with his becoming
my ex) had posters of Loni Anderson and Cheryl Ladd on his walls.
I suppose I rationalized that "it didn't matter where he got his
appetite, as long as he ate at home", but it kind of bothered me
at first. However, he said he loved me a great deal, and although
they were nice pictures to look at, how many of the cheesecake cuties
could possibly be like me mentally and emotionally? How many of
them could entertain questions on mechanical and electrical
engineering, literature, machining tools, piano pieces, egyptian
history, maxfield parrish art, creative writing, and computers -
without making total fools of themselves? The poise is there, the
look is there, and I am sure some of them are very intelligent,
but none of them were me!
-Jody
|
139.46 | You get what you pay for! | AITG::HUBERMAN | | Thu Sep 01 1988 11:20 | 6 |
| I can help but think that sex symbol worship is adolescent.
I personally could not relate to anyone who would seriously be
interested in photos of cuties.
SAH
|
139.47 | big bucks ? | STEREO::FLIS | missed me | Thu Sep 01 1988 12:53 | 5 |
| re: .44
A friend of mine does this. cost: about $900 a session.
jim
|
139.48 | | COGMK::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Thu Sep 01 1988 14:26 | 5 |
| Re: .46
>I can help but think that sex symbol worship is adolescent.
True, but a well-developed sense of aesthetics is *very* adult ....
|
139.49 | Sure! | AITG::HUBERMAN | | Thu Sep 01 1988 17:56 | 5 |
| > True, but a well-developed sense of aesthetics is *very* adult ....
There is a difference between appreciating a pretty face and collecting
and/or hiding photos of one particular model.
|
139.50 | | DSSDEV::RUST | | Fri Sep 02 1988 10:27 | 9 |
| Re .49:
>There is a difference between appreciating a pretty face and
>collecting and/or hiding photos of one particular model.
Also true... but they'll get my Mike Boddicker picture when they
pry my cold, dead fingers off of it!
-b
|
139.51 | | BOXTOP::BOONE | Chris...the brown Fox | Fri Sep 02 1988 10:34 | 8 |
| You could think of it this way. When a man/woman stops
"looking" then there's definately something wrong somewhere.
As long as they don't touch, there's nothing wrong with looking.
chris
|
139.52 | Abuse .gt. issue of picture | AKOV12::MILLIOS | I grok. Share water? | Fri Sep 02 1988 11:15 | 29 |
| As I read the 20-odd replies before this one (I've been busy the
past few days, folks :^), I couldn't help but notice how much people
have been focusing on the picture, instead of the abuse...
If the abuse was not there, then the pictures would not matter as
much, if at all...
Perhaps some meaningful advice in terms of getting Donna's husband
to respect her would be in order:
One of the things I've noticed in life, generally:
"To appreciate a roof, you must first stand in the rain."
I say, give him a vacation, and take a break yourself... If I was
being as [nasty|rude|whatever] as this guy seems to be, then I'd
wake up real quick if someone I'd taken for granted suddenly was
not there...
I'd suggest backing off a bit, and then trying to re-define the
terms of the relationship. Ignore the picture - that's a little
thing...
Or, you could just haul off and pop him in the jaw the next time
he tells you to "Shut up"... :^) It might have serious consequences
(i.e. *really* tee him off), but you'd feel better temporarily!
[ABOVE SUGGESTION NOT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY!]
Bill
|
139.53 | comment on bill's reply | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | Purple power! | Fri Sep 02 1988 12:08 | 16 |
| re: Note 139.52 by AKOV12::MILLIOS
While I wouldn't recommend "popping him in the jaw", there is something
to what Bill says. In particular, you don't have to take that type of
treatment. And you do have a right to "push back". Not that you need to
get violent to prove your point, but you _can_ say things like "I don't
deserve that type of treatment." "I know I haven't done anything to
merit that comment. Is there something else you're upset about?". When
I learned to reply that way, it shocked both of us out of bad habits
that we'd developed. And it led to our being able to discuss what was
really going on in our lives so that we could stop taking our
frustrations out on each other.
Take care & best of luck
Liz
|
139.54 | ! | HANDY::MALLETT | Philosopher Clown | Fri Sep 02 1988 18:27 | 5 |
| re: .47
$900?!!? A session??!! Wow am I ever in the wrong business. . .
Steve
|
139.55 | Here's the poop | TUNER::FLIS | missed me | Sat Sep 03 1988 22:23 | 31 |
| re: .47
No s__t! I talked with my friend about this (no, he doesn't need
an assistant... ;-)
These are the rules that *he* sets up; seems that each outfit has
its own set of rules.
- He photos men or women or couples
- If a woman, she MUST bring a woman friend, men are not allowed
(This includes husbands, boyfriends and fathers)
- If a man, he MUST bring a male friend, women are not allowed
- If a couple, they must come alone and both participate in the
photo shoot.
- A proffessional hair dresser is provided
- A proffessional makeup artist is provided
- Photo shoots can occure in any legal local (ie: bedroom (or any
other room of the house), beach, car, etc, etc.)
- Photo shoots can be with any attire from nude to fully clothed,
any thing in between.
- He will NOT shoot anyone he knows nor the spouse of anyone he
knows.
Seems that nude and nightie shots are a fav with the women and Rambo
and Tarzan shots are fav with the men ;-)
I do not know how long a shoot lasts or how many photos result,
but I can check if any are interested, and post the data.
jimmy
|
139.56 | MEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | FTMUDG::GRANDE | | Thu Dec 15 1988 16:06 | 17 |
| MY LIVE-IN SAYS THE SAME THING- I LIVE WITH YOU AND LOVE YOU BUT
I CAN STILL LOOK. LOOK-MAYBE I CAN DEAL WITH THAT BUT WHEN YOU
DOWN RIGHT STARE THEN IT REALLY HURTS MY FEELINGS. HE WOULDN'T LOOK
AT ME TWICE BUT IF A DOG WALKED DOWN THE STREET HE WOULD BREAK HIS
NECK TO DO IT. HE ALSO SAYS THAT WOMEN DO THE SAME THING LOOKING
AT MEN. I DISAGREE-I DON'T THINK WOMEN ARE LIKE MEN WHEN THEY LOOK
AT THE OPPOSITE. I DON'T THINK WOMAN ARE AS PICKY AS MEN WHEN IT
COMES TO LOOKS. MEN SEEM TO WANT THIS LITTLE CHINA-DOLL FIGURE
SHE COULD BE TOTALLY UNATTRACTIVE BUT AS LONG AS SHE HAS A FIGURE
WHAT ELSE MATTERS-HER PERSONALITY? NO WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ON THE
OTHER HAND-I THINK WOMEN CARE MORE ABOUT HIS PERSONALITY THAN TRYING
TO LOOK THROUGH HIS CLOTHES TO "SEE" IF HE HAS GREAT PARTS!
|
139.57 | Moderator Advice | RAINBO::TARBET | | Thu Dec 15 1988 16:28 | 4 |
| There's no way you could have known this in advance, but using all
caps is considered the electric equivalent of shouting.
=maggie
|
139.58 | Kick the Bum Out! | TYCOBB::TPSEC | | Thu Feb 02 1989 16:09 | 12 |
| Donna,
This is a tough situation, which has to be handled carefully,
it is every woman's deepest fear to find out her husband has another
woman. Usually when you are married that long, a lot of men have
affairs on the side because they want to think to themselves that
they still "have it". I am sorry to say that if I was in that
type of situation, it would be grounds for divorce. Once a man is
unfaithful, they will always be, personally I would not put up with
it. It is nice to work things out, but when you have that betrayed
feeling, it is kind of hard....just voicing my opinion.
Lynne
|