| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 859.1 | Comfort before "looks" | STRSHP::SULLIVAN | Karen - 225-4096 | Fri May 27 1988 18:49 | 3 |
| I really don't care. I'd say wear what's comfortable.
When you get to a point where someone will see them, they
probably won't be on much longer anyways :-).
|
| 859.2 | unless you're looking | BLURB::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Tue May 31 1988 10:29 | 6 |
| I adore skimpy briefs on men. (I clip and save Jim Palmer's ads).
But that's only for, er, special occasions. For every day I expect
a man to wear what is comfortable.
--bonnie
|
| 859.3 | comfort | TWEED::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Tue May 31 1988 11:06 | 5 |
| My vote would be for comfort also...tho I would vote for *something*
I have twice been embarassed by men who chose the nothing route
and were not careful when wearing shorts.
Bonnie
|
| 859.4 | OOOOOO thats NAAAAASSSTTTYYyyyy! | SALEM::AMARTIN | DIG IT AL | Tue May 31 1988 11:53 | 3 |
| I could not resist TWEEDy,
You shouldn't have been looking.... :-)
AL :-)
|
| 859.5 | oh well.. | VOLGA::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Tue May 31 1988 12:05 | 4 |
| I knew I shouldn't have put that in...sigh...the situation was
such that the condition was very difficult to miss.
B
|
| 859.6 | | CUBFAN::STHILAIRE | Best before Oct. 3, 1999 | Tue May 31 1988 12:31 | 8 |
| I prefer standard or "skimpy" briefs, whichever the male finds most
comfortable. Boxer shorts look really geeky, and might indicate
that the guy is "out of it" (a real loser) ha-ha. No underwear
indicates that he might be too carefree and irresponsible, or else
is trying to make an effort to appear sexy. :-).
Lorna
|
| 859.7 | Be comfy!! | SACMAN::WALTON | | Tue May 31 1988 12:34 | 14 |
| For some unknown reason, I have always been particular to plain
white breifs. Just the thought of it and my mind starts to wander!!!
In any case, whatever is comfortable to you is appropriate.
Sue
P.S. To Bonnie...
My husband choses not to wear shorts (he is a product of the tropical
rain forests of the Phillipines) and I am forever in terror that
one day he will embarrass me in the same manner you are refering
to!!!!!
|
| 859.8 | for various reasons | SPMFG1::CHARBONND | generic personal name | Tue May 31 1988 13:24 | 1 |
| re .6 Lorna, you wouldn't say that to Sugar Ray :-)
|
| 859.9 | NOTHING | UTAH::LINEHAN | | Tue May 31 1988 14:51 | 1 |
| I prefer nothing at all.
|
| 859.10 | I Wish... | HENRYY::HASLAM_BA | | Wed Jun 01 1988 18:36 | 5 |
| If I had a choice, I'd prefer skimpy briefs; however, my husband
will definitely NOT wear the aformentioned item, so it's only wishful
thinking on my part.
Barb
|
| 859.11 | Is this for real? | BUFFER::LEEDBERG | An Ancient Multi-hued Dragon | Fri Jun 03 1988 17:39 | 10 |
|
Body Bags....
_peggy
Only kidding.....
|
| 859.12 | the velcro fly | CADSE::FRANK | My other node is PORSCHE | Fri Jun 17 1988 15:24 | 7 |
| I like the ones that have velcro closures on the side.
One good tug and he's wearing nothing!
But you can't wear those everyday.......
- Lesley
|
| 859.13 | on the practical side.. | RUNTUF::SZKLARZ | | Fri Jun 17 1988 16:08 | 15 |
|
Well since I happen to like to wear practical and comfortable
undergarments - no garter belts and merry widow's for this lady
on a regular basis - I'd think that men also would opt for comfort.
I don't find the standard BVD's offensive. And for those lounge
around mornings on the porch over looking the ocean, I think boxers
are quite appropriate (OK, so I've looked at the cover of the Victoria's
Secret catalog too many times ;^). But when I'm in a playful mood
I like to see something a bit more enticing, like bikini style
briefs, or brightly colored silk ones and I too like the magic of
velcro. And then there's a great pair of leopard print briefs
that I'm still waiting to see modeled. ;^)
lsn
|