T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
686.1 | oh, blush | VIA::RANDALL | back in the notes life again | Thu Jan 28 1988 16:55 | 7 |
| How did you know I just backed up real fast to get out of reach
of a stranger intruding well into my circle of comfort -- and I
knocked over a pile of those plastic hanging files . . .
At least he knows what he did wrong!
--bonnie
|
686.2 | really, it works! | NECVAX::VEILLEUX | | Thu Jan 28 1988 18:13 | 19 |
| re.1
Are you sure he knows?
.0
When I am in the company of strangers I have a very definite "off
limits" circle around me. This usually only lasts during the first
meeting. After that my circle decreases with every additional meeting
there on. I am my nature a physical person, meaning that I usually
touch the person that I am addressing. I am very attuned to other's
circles though and can tell when I have crossed the boundries by
reading their body language.
This note has brought something to mind. Next time you are in an
argument, touch the other person. ie: on the arm or hand You will be
surprised at their reaction. This simple gesture will usually help
to bring the argument down at least two octaves. ;-)
|
686.3 | no, it wasn't harrassment | VIA::RANDALL | back in the notes life again | Thu Jan 28 1988 18:35 | 15 |
|
re: .2 --
Yes, I'm sure he knows. He's from another culture, and I made the
mistake of assuming he was making a harrasing gesture when he was
in fact just moving into what he considered conversational range.
He immediately realized he had blundered and apologized -- apparently
he has been having quite a bit of difficulty with violating the
space of colleagues.
I don't know if he has different rules for determining this space
or if his circles are simply smaller. If I see him again, I may
ask him. (Hard to say about someone you've only just met.)
--bonnie
|
686.4 | Interesting, indeed. | QBUS::WOOD | Met him on a Monday | Thu Jan 28 1988 19:14 | 21 |
|
Interesting topic....we did an exercise about this very
thing in a Communications class that I took a few years
ago. We were paired up with another person and told to
stand wherever felt comfortable to talk with that other
person...there was more to it than that, but my memory
is failing me today! Anyway, it was interesting how the
distance varied with each pair. It all boils down to
what each individual feels comfortable with and also
(I think) just how secure and self-confident we feel
about ourselves. If we sense approaching danger because
of the closeness then probably most of us are going to
back away and widen that "circle of comfort".
With my SO I like to be "close" when we are having a
discussion...no matter what it is about. With my kids,
I see them backing away sometimes when we are talking
about a subject that they really don't want to talk
about...like home-work, grades, curfews, etc!
Myra
|
686.5 | | CADSYS::SULLIVAN | Karen - 225-4096 | Fri Jan 29 1988 09:29 | 15 |
| I've only felt this a couple times in my life. It seems to
happen to me when a man is much more intersted in me than
I am in him. This happened when I first met my husband.
Tom would always stand too close and I often got backed up
to the office walls. Made me very uncomfortable, but I also
liked him a lot so I put up with it. Now he can get much
closer, but there's still a point where he gets too close. This
is when he's too close for my eyes to focus properly (about 6 inches).
There's a man in a store I go to a lot that gets too close. When
I ask him for help with picking out paint or something he stands
really close. I notice he stands back more when I'm with Tom.
Seems to verify my theory somehow.
..Karen
|
686.6 | too close and too far | STUBBI::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Fri Jan 29 1988 09:56 | 10 |
| This reminds me of a conversation I had with a young man back
when I was in college. I was standing at the bottom of a sloping
ramp and while we talked he kept moving up and down the ramp.
He would go from being almost too far away to comfortably talk
to to almost touching me (way in side my circle of comfort!).
The contrast was extremely uncomfortable....kind of felt like
being repeatedly attacked...and all it was was a friendly conversation.
It was a very weird experience, even remembering it makes me itchy.
Bonnie
|
686.7 | behaviorism blew it | VINO::EVANS | | Fri Jan 29 1988 15:59 | 42 |
|
RE: .6 (sort of)
The expanse/decrease of space in conversation reminded me that your
space is also "psychic" (uhmm...wrong word, maybe) "mental", or
(yes I *really* believe this) "intuitive". I think our feelings
of threat or non-threat are a *combination* of the physical and
psychic (I *like* the word...I'll use it) space.
You *can* feel threatened by someone you don't know well who is
standing far away, making perfectly friendly conversation. Or be
perfectly comfortable with someone you don't know well who is
standing quite close. OR...<mix up the parameters and intuitions>
...etc.
And just to throw another monkey wrench into the works, *you* may
have an uncomfortable feeling about someone (vague, you know? you
can't really figure out *why* you feel that way...?) and it
could be coming from *them*! You're just picking up on their feelings,
(or energy, if you will).
RE: physical space
It's sometimes fun to see if you can guess how close people are
by seeing how often they "invade each other's space". There's some
good material on this in Fast's _Body Language_.
I notice the members of my massage therapy class tend to stand quite
close together. We hug a lot, and we sit close together in lectures.
When we have to pass each other in close quarters, we always touch
the person we're passing. Now at *work*, things are very VERY
different! It's really funny to see some of the gyrations people
will go through to avoid touching someone! Crowded meeting with
people jockeying for positions at the table are especially amusing!!
(my opinion) We've really been warped into a "no-touch" society,
and it really isn't good for us. Ashley Montagu's book _TOUCHING_
gives excellent information on this. (Warning: it *is* somewhat
sexist, but worth reading)
--DE
|
686.8 | | QBUS::WOOD | Met him on a Monday | Fri Jan 29 1988 17:18 | 7 |
|
And of course this "expanse/decrease of space in conversation"
applies to conversations between men and women, women and women,
and ( I guess ) men and men. Not just members of the opposite
sex.
|
686.9 | height differentials | YODA::BARANSKI | Im here for an argument, not Abuse! | Sat Jan 30 1988 23:03 | 11 |
| I have found also that the height differnce between the people talking makes a
difference. The highest has more 'power'. That may have been part of what was
bothering Bonnie.
It's interesting to put a group of people in a room with different height
chairs...
I find myself occasionally taking a comfortable seat on the floor though
regardless of this...
Jim.
|
686.10 | I expand to my perimeter physically | BUFFER::LEEDBERG | An Ancient Multi-hued Dragon | Sun Jan 31 1988 17:34 | 19 |
|
I tend to move around a lot when I am speaking and I would probably
end up walking up and down a ramp if I was on one while I was in
the mists of a conversation. I also talk with my hands, arms, and
whole body a lot. (This is difficult to convey through a machine
or two.)
_peggy
(-)
|
I body talk an elbow to the ribs to anyone
who gets that close without my permission or
I raise my arms to the Queen of Heaven - deflecting
any unwanted body parts in my way.
|
686.11 | | CYRUS::DRISKELL | | Mon Feb 01 1988 21:54 | 15 |
| Then there's always the joy of dancing with strangers. You know,
those who keep moving in closer. My favorite technique is to spin
in a circle with my elbow bent & my arm held straight out from the
shoulder. Kinda' hard to explain but _very_ effective. I literally
define a circle around my body where, if anyone 'invades', they
get 'bumped'. When I had long hair, the spin would wip my hair
out & produce the same effect also.
(And those strangers always thought it was an accident!!! :-) )
When standing & talking, & someone moves into my space, sometime's
I'll move into their's, and it tends to force them back. However,
it doesn't work if their circle is well beyond the space I'm willing
to go !
|
686.12 | regional differences, too | JUNIOR::TASSONE | Just for the feel of it! | Wed Feb 03 1988 16:36 | 13 |
| At IDECUS one year, the speaker was talking about this topic to
a large group of administrative people in Digital.
She spoke of a couple of people who met at an international conference.
The gentleman walked over to a woman and introduced himself. He
kept trying to talk to her as he moved closer and closer. She,
in turn, kept backing up. He finally asked her what was wrong.
She said, "in my country, what you're doing is a "come on" and then
he stated, "well, in my country, this is normal talking distance
between two strangers. We get even closer when we know each other".
Cathy
|
686.13 | workshop observations | DECSIM::LTSMITH | Leslie | Fri Feb 19 1988 16:54 | 31 |
| I attended a Women's Workshop recently, and we were asked to
describe our 'boundaries' with masking tape. (Remember that in a
workshop the methods are rarely analytical, but rather more
expressive and picture-oriented.)
Well anyway, most people showed their boundaries as concentric
circles around themselves, with tests and doorways into inner
circles. When asked about the tests for the doorways, most of us
could not be specific about the test, and mentioned that the
boundaries could be influenced by outside forces -- being pushed
by someone. Most women also had boundaries on themselves showing
entrances to their hearts.
Our facilitators said that the lack of clarity around boundaries
and making them solid is a women's issue, and a culture issue.
Women need to be comfortable enough with their boundaries to
enforce them, and the culture has to respect the boundaries.
The facilitators also said that the behavior of boundaries
expressed on one's own body was typically a female trait. Most
men have boundaries which are very close to them for loved ones,
but typically not touching them.
Two fascinating observations to ponder....
-Leslie
|