[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | ARCHIVE-- Topics of Interest to Women, Volume 1 --ARCHIVE |
Notice: | V1 is closed. TURRIS::WOMANNOTES-V5 is open. |
Moderator: | REGENT::BROOMHEAD |
|
Created: | Thu Jan 30 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 30 1995 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 873 |
Total number of notes: | 22329 |
664.0. "Small observation" by HANDY::MALLETT (Situation hopeless but not serious) Thu Jan 21 1988 16:31
I thought I'd pass on something I read last week that, while
not any kind of "proof" that the world has changed, just
struck me as one interesting sign of the times.
Although I don't recall the exact date (late last week, I
believe), the Globe ran a story (pg. 3?) that reported
the conviction and sentencing of a man for (something like)
"Importing minors for illegal sexual purposes". I'm
pretty sure the word "importing" is close but no cigar,
however that's not what surprised me.
The story was about three quarters of a column long - not
lengthy but more than a one-paragraph-quickie and I was
struck by what I *didn't* read. It wasn't until the very
last paragraph that, the reporter, in reference to one of the minor
victims used the pronoun "he". I went back and re-read. Sure
enough, until that last paragraph, the reporter had apparently
been very careful to make it impossible to tell the sex of the
victims. I felt like that solitary "he" made a kind of statement.
Not so long ago, any kind of legal action involving 1) a defendant
who was any sort of official (the offender was a minor something-
or-other) and 2) homosexuality, played up the second factor. The
message in this story seemed to be that "The offense is what matters,
the sexuality of the parties involved is irrelevant."
Now, I'm almost certain that this particular article indicates
neither a "position statement" from the Globe, nor a trend or
movement in journalism, etc. etc. Maybe it "means" nothing; I
don't know. But for some reason(s) (not entirely clear to me)
I felt like this might be one small signpost that things are
changing a little in some places for the better - maybe (some)
people are beginning to focus on the "true" (to me, of course)
problem of sexual coercion and not the "false" issue of
"right/wrong or good/bad" sexuality.
Steve (the formerly professional but currently amateur observer)
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
664.1 | | CSC32::JOHNS | Yes, I am *still* pregnant :-) | Fri Jan 22 1988 13:19 | 5 |
| Steve, I agree that this is a good sign. I wish it happened more
often. Now we just need to impress upon people that sex with minors
is not necessarily homosexuality or heterosexuality, but pedophilia.
Carol
|
664.2 | Got Me in a Blind Spot | HANDY::MALLETT | Situation hopeless but not serious | Fri Jan 22 1988 17:39 | 4 |
| re: .1 Agreed
Steve
|
664.4 | | HANDY::MALLETT | Situation hopeless but not serious | Mon Jan 25 1988 17:16 | 7 |
| re: .3
Could be, Mike. Do you know if "transporting" covers international
boundries as well?
Steve
|