T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
601.1 | <LUCKY TO BE ALIVE> | AKOV11::EARLS | | Fri Dec 18 1987 14:20 | 7 |
| I AGREE, I AGREE...............
Having just recoved from a near fatal accident I must stress this
point...........
PLEASE DO NOT DRINK AND DRIVE YOU MIGHT NOT BE AS LUCKY AS I WAS.
|
601.2 | Driver OR passenger | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Fri Dec 18 1987 17:19 | 2 |
| And wear your seatbelt.
Ann B.
|
601.3 | \ | BEING::MCANULTY | Neither here nor there | Fri Dec 18 1987 17:51 | 11 |
|
> And wear your seatbelt.
> Ann B.
I'm a rare case. I didn't have mine on, nor my passenger.
If we did, we both would be dead. They are not always the
answer.
Mike
|
601.4 | you can't fool Mother Nature forever | MOSAIC::TARBET | | Fri Dec 18 1987 17:57 | 5 |
| No, Mike, you're quite right, they're not always the answer.
And people sometimes *do* fill an inside straight ;-)
=maggie
|
601.5 | annonymous entry | YAZOO::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Fri Dec 18 1987 23:00 | 44 |
| The following answer is from a noter who wishes to be annonymous
___________________________________________________________-
This past August I was involved in a one-car accident.
I was the driver, my girlfriend was the passenger.
We went out for a night of dancing and a "couple"
drinks. Well, when I left I thought I was OK.
It was pouring very badly out, and I was doing under
the speed limit by about 5 miles on RT 3. After I passed
the last exit out of NH, a car came flying across the
lanes and cut in front of me. I slammed on the brakes, and
rolled the car four times. I was thrown out into a pine-tree
and got knocked out. My girlfriend remained in the car.
We were both extremely lucky. I had a couple of stitches in the
face, and she got a bruise on the back. When the insurance
company called, they asked how many people died in the accident.
Enough of that.
What I'm going to say, can only be realized by someone that this
has happened to, but should never be realized by anyone.
The monetary cost of fines, and DWI school are nothing...$750
My insurance will go up.
Since then my girlfriend and I have broken up, but remain extremely
close friends.
I pain every time I see her. To think of what I did too her, and
what more I could have done. I think of the pain I put my parents
through at 3:30 in the AM (I live at home, common courtesy). I
think of the pain her parents went through at 10:30 the next day,
because the hospital never called her home. That's what hurts,
not the short change in the pocket, not the loss of license,
but of what could have been....the nightmares day in and day out..
I still have them.
I plead, please don't drink and drive.....Take it from someone that
knows.
I made a mistake once...that's it. ONCE.
|
601.6 | On the other hand... | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | The Dread Pirate Roberts | Sat Dec 19 1987 02:32 | 9 |
| re:.3
Back during my teens, I was on my way home one night and for some
reason unbeknownst to me, I put on my seatbelt (I had never worn
it before). I was almost all the way home when I dozed off at the
wheel. If I had not had that seatbelt on, I would in all likelihood
be dead or seriously injured. I've worn my seatbelt ever since.
--- jerry
|
601.7 | and on the other hand | SEDJAR::THIBAULT | Storybook ending in progress | Sat Dec 19 1987 11:40 | 6 |
| Four years ago my 15-year old cousin was in an accident. The driver had been
drinking. He lost control and hit a tree. Except for a head injury my cousin
did not have a scratch on his body. If he had been wearing his seatbelt
he would be celebrating Christmas this year...
Jenna
|
601.8 | Seat belts are a good idea | MAY20::MINOW | Je suis marxiste, tendance Groucho | Sat Dec 19 1987 16:46 | 14 |
| In the early 1970's, the Swedish government did a study of all fatal
accidents in one model-year of Volvos. The study was a cooperative
effort between Volvo, the insurance companies, the Traffic Safety
Board, and the people who investigate airplane crashes.
There were 131 fatalities. 129 were not wearing seat belts.
Sweden required seat belt usage by all passengars the following year.
One problem with someone saying "if I had a belt on, I would have died"
is that -- if the above numbers generalize -- 65 people are not around
to give a different opinion.
Martin.
|
601.9 | | CADSE::GLIDEWELL | | Sat Dec 19 1987 18:11 | 19 |
| Best Book: The Art of Expert Driving by Fales (I forget his first name.)
The book was given a terrific review by The Whole Earth Catalog, which I
found while combing the library on how-to-drive books. I found about 30
books and The Art was far and away the best.
See, in 1978 I totaled my Ford, in 1980 I totaled my Gremlin, in 1981 I
got a ticket and, to avoid the fine, I went to safe driving school, where I
realized my driving skills were ... ah .... lacking. Thus the library hunt.
No more accidents. I'm now a pretty good driver.
Point of interest: Accident researches say that there are 10 common factors
that lead to car accidents. Most serious accidents occur when three or
more are present at the same time. Here are the four I remember:
driving too fast for conditions
bad weather
driver is tired
driver has been drinking Meigs
|
601.10 | It's not only alcohol... | SHIRE::BIZE | | Mon Dec 21 1987 04:26 | 43 |
| On September 14th, 1985, a gentleman in a big hurry did not stop
at a red light. He dashed into my car with great violence, detroying
both cars completely. He then promptly jumped out of his car, wrenched
my door open, and started insulting me loudly and violently, and
saying I had not stopped at the red light. I was fairly groggy from
the shock at that time, and accepted what he told me. When I managed
to get out of the car and call my husband, I told him I had caused
an accident, probably by driving through a red light, though I could
not remember anything about it. When the police came, a gentleman
stepped in and said that he had been waiting at the pedestrian crossing
and that the other driver, not myself, had driven at great speed
through the red light.
What I'd like to say is that:
- though both cars were completely demolished, both the other
driver and myself were wearing our seat belts and had nothing
but badly scratched knees.
- if somebody had not taken some of his precious time to wait
for the police and testify, I would probably have stayed with
the burden of having caused a potentially very dangerous
accident, destroying two cars (we were not able at that time
to buy a car again, because it was an old car and we got very
little insurance money), and a feeling of complete inadequacy.
I swore to myself that if I ever witnessed an accident, I
would testify to what I had seen, whatever the cost to myself.
- after that accident, I did not drive for a full year, not
only because we couldn't afford to buy a car, but because I
was petrified at the thought that I could be driving at a
normal speed, being normally attentive, and that somebody
could come out of nowhere, attempt to kill me by driving
recklessly, destroy the life of my family, and escape guilt
free for lack of witnesses, and continue heedlessly on a path
of destruction (I know I sound melodramatic, but it's something
I feel very strongly about, and even after two years the anger
has not abated).
So, we should all drive carefully, but also honestly: if we provoke
an accident, we should own up to it. Everybody makes mistakes, but
letting other people pay for our mistakes is despicable.
|
601.11 | | BEING::MCANULTY | Neither here nor there | Mon Dec 21 1987 08:21 | 16 |
|
Was this an omen. Seatbelts. My father said yesterday,
wear a seatbelt. He never, ever said that to me. Yesterday
I was the passenger of a hit-run accident, that totaled both
cars. The other driver ran, literally. By the time I could
get out of our car, he had ripped the plate off the back of his
(plastic license frame), and ran down the street....stolen car ???
BTW, I wasn't wearing a seatbelt. I have a tremendous
headache this a.m........
1987 the year the wasn't....
Michael
|
601.12 | Now I'm wishing my chair at work had seatbelts... | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Mon Dec 21 1987 10:50 | 5 |
| re .11
If it was a stolen car, it's very unlikely the thief would have
taken the time to remove the license plate. Tracing it from the
VID might be interesting...
|
601.13 | so sorry... | BEING::MCANULTY | Bucky B Crashed | Mon Dec 21 1987 11:21 | 25 |
|
Well this is from what I understood. A person who routinely
steals cars, will use his own plate. Reason being, if the car
is stolen, and their is APB out for a particular license plate
it won't be matched, therefore, he won't be stopped. I took
the papers out of the glove compartment, and kept them until
the police arrived, and handed them to him. THe VID number on
the car, matched the papers in the glove compartment, but
without the plate, it will be hard to find the guy, if he stole
it. The plate was in a plastic frame...(left on the ground)
so you break thge plastic and run...two seconds of time.....
A witness to the accident saw what happened, and saw the kid run
into a schoolyard down the street, and then get into a red
Toy. Corolla SR%,a nd he got the license plate, and where the
car was headed. This happened in Lynn Ma, I am totally unfamiliar
with most of that area....
Sorry to go off on a tangent....
M-
|
601.14 | I'm so angry about this... | JUNIOR::TASSONE | The age of our cruise director, 65 | Mon Dec 21 1987 15:03 | 49 |
| Here are some interesting facts related to drinking, driving and
getting caught in Massachusetts.
First time offenders: if you are found guilty of intoxication (.1 Blood
alcohol level) while behind the wheel, there is a $100.00 fine,
loss of license for 45 days and a 21-week alcohol treatment program.
(Cost about $450.00).
Second time offense is stiffer fine (I forget), up to two weeks
in jail, loss of license for 2 years (or is it 1 year), and a more
expensive alcohol treatment program.
Third time offenders are treated as alcoholics and sent to programs
such as AA (after paying unbelievable fines and doing time in a
cell block).
...and, if you hit and kill someone, you are tried not only for
being intoxicated, but for manslaughter (vehicular homicide).
Sad thing here: for every 12 people caught, there are over 500 who
get away with it.
My note:
Raising the drinking age has helped. Raising the speed limit will
not. NOT RECOGNIZING ALCOHOL FOR WHAT IT IS ****A DRUG**** IS THE
CAUSE OF THESE ACCIDENTS
I'll say this: I had one (1) , just one, I SAID ONE beer and I
got involved in an accident that gave me 14 stitches to my mouth
and caused a friend of mine to crash into my windshield (no seatbelts
in 1978) and continues to have severe back trauma. Me, ***I***
did that to her and me. I never saw so much blood come out of my
body before. Remember, all it took was one beer to throw my judgement
off. I hit a pick-up truck HEAD ON doing 35, but he was doing 65,
an impact of 45 (65 + 35 = 90/2 = 45mph). I could have easily avoided
him if I hadn't been buzzed.
I no longer drink alcoholic (drug) beverages. They are a waste
to my body and my mind. All they do is cause family problems and
kill innocent people. I will never touch alcohol again.
...and I wear my seatbelt, constantly. It's like a second skin
to me.
Cathy (who angrily deals with an alcoholic sister who gets behind
the wheel of her car, without a care to who is in her way
|
601.15 | From What I Remember About Physics | FDCV03::ROSS | | Mon Dec 21 1987 17:13 | 12 |
| RE: .14
Cathy, you were both lucky that you're still around.
From the speeds both you and the pickup truck were doing, the
*actual* impact speed was 100MPH, not 45.
In a head-on collision, you simply add the speed of each vehicle
to determine the speed at the moment of impact. You do not divide
this number by two, simply because there were 2 vehicles.
Alan
|
601.16 | | TFH::MARSHALL | hunting the snark | Mon Dec 21 1987 17:20 | 15 |
| re .15:
> In a head-on collision, you simply add the speed of each vehicle
> to determine the speed at the moment of impact. You do not divide
> this number by two, simply because there were 2 vehicles.
Yes you do. All that energy is being dissipated by 2 vehicles, so
each dissipates half the total.
/
( ___
) ///
/
|
601.17 | Moderator Request | MOSAIC::TARBET | | Mon Dec 21 1987 17:50 | 4 |
| Please let's not dilute Cathy's message by starting an argument over
physics. Right?
=maggie
|
601.18 | | SUPER::HENDRICKS | The only way out is through | Mon Dec 21 1987 23:03 | 18 |
| How much is .1?
I usually feel fine if I have 2 drinks of any kind *with* dinner
and drive home 90 minutes later. I've often wondered where that
put me on the legal spectrum, though, and I've also wondered how much
difference time makes.
I feel a little cynical when I hear about the severe penalties above,
and then drive by a lounge which is doing a brisk business and has
a parking lot full of cars. If the place doesn't serve significant
food, caters to a clientele which spends most of the evening there,
and doesn't have an obvious number of "designated drivers", my
assumption is that most people leaving the place are well over the
limit.
With all the publicity about drunk driving, the places which mainly
serve liquor still seem to be doing a very brisk business with people
who drive there and back.
|
601.19 | | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | The Dread Pirate Roberts | Tue Dec 22 1987 06:48 | 14 |
| re:.10
I had a similar incident happen to me. I was stopped at a red
light on Mass Ave. in Arlington. The light turned green, and I
started to go when a car came flying through the red light in
perpendicular direction. It was a female high-schooler who was
hysterical that "her father was going to kill her". I wouldn't
be surprised if he did, since it appeared that when she got home,
she told him that I was the one who ran the red light. When I
told him otherwise, I said I had two witnesses who saw it my
way. One was a vice president of Arthur D. Little, the other
one was a minister. One couldn't ask for better witnesses.
--- jerry
|
601.20 | Another seat belter! | KRYPTN::GERTZ | BuTRflysRFree | Tue Dec 22 1987 07:11 | 6 |
| I was involved in a car accident on the way to work in October.
The whole left side of my car was damaged. I actually felt the
seat belt I was wearing hold me against the seat. The impact
did cause my head to hit the driver's side window quite hard.
I don't like to think what might have happened had I not been
wearing the belt.
|
601.21 | shoulder harness's a must | CADSYS::SULLIVAN | Karen - 225-4096 | Tue Dec 22 1987 09:18 | 10 |
| In one accident I was in, I was in the back seat with a lap
belt on. The force of the accident caused my head to go forward
and hit the seat in front of me (bloody nose), and I got a
hairline fracture of my spine. It might have been worse
without the seat belt (the people in the front would have
gone through the windshield without their's), but I would
have been a lot better off with a shoulder harness too. Why
do so few cars provide them in the back?
...Karen
|
601.22 | | CALLME::MR_TOPAZ | | Tue Dec 22 1987 09:34 | 12 |
| re .21:
> Why do so few cars provide [shoulder harnesses] in the back?
Most auto manufacturers did not include lap belts in cars until
the government required them to; front-seat shoulder harnesses
were equally rare until they were required, too. The government
hasn't required rear-seat harnesses, and it's unlikely that they
will be commonplace, or even an available option on most cars,
unless they are required by law.
--Mr Topaz
|
601.23 | oooo I get so angry sometimes! | JUNIOR::TASSONE | The age of our cruise director, 65 | Tue Dec 22 1987 11:59 | 35 |
| More notes:
It takes the body (average weight 150 pounds) 1 hour to digest and get
rid of 1 oz of pure alcohol (= 12 ounce beer, 4 ounces wine, 1 shot
hard liquor). So, if you weight 150 pounds and have 1 drink, you
should wait 1 hour after drinking before driving home.
2 drinks/hour = wait 2 hours after drinking,
3 drinks/hour = wait 3 hours after drinking.
Anyone that consumes 4 drinks/hour who weighs 150 pounds is
pushing it because the bar is going to close with you lying on the floor.
Point - just because men are men and women are women does not mean
that men need more to feel a buzz and women need less to feel a
buzz. It has nothing to do with the sex of the individual. It
has to do with body weight and how many drinks in what period of
time that will give an accurate BAL (blood alcohol level).
Blood alcohol level explanations are not on the tip of my tongue.
But, based on what I know, if I were to have 3 drinks in one hour
having had no food and I weigh 125 pounds, needless to say I would
not be cabable of walking right, let alone operating a dangerous
piece of machinery.
So, when you go out on a Saturday night, and you "don't" drink,
you're in danger of being victimized by someone that does drink
and drive.
I guess it'll have to hit your real close before you do anything
about it. I hate to admit this but when I find out that my sister
drives from Boston to Quincy and back home again after boozing it
up at the Boston Marathon, I want to shake her until she falls apart
and then she can say she's hit rock bottom, crawl off her a** and
ask for God to help her.
Cathy (who sees her ACOA anger showing through, but tough)
|
601.24 | Numerical nit picking | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | The rug is not an inertial frame. | Tue Dec 22 1987 16:26 | 12 |
| >< Note 601.23 by JUNIOR::TASSONE "The age of our cruise director, 65" >
> -< oooo I get so angry sometimes! >-
>
> 1 oz of pure alcohol (= 12 ounce beer, 4 ounces wine, 1 shot
> hard liquor).
I think you mean 1/2 oz. Hard liquor is about 50% alcohol, so a 1
oz. shot has 1/2 oz. of alcohol. Wine is typically about 12%
alcohol,so 4 oz. is 1/2 oz. of alcohol. American beer is around 4
or 5% alcohol.
--David
|
601.25 | oh, well,let us nit | JUNIOR::TASSONE | Never been kissed, 16 | Tue Dec 22 1987 16:58 | 16 |
| re .24 Forget the ounces. Let me put it another way. There is
the same amount of alcohol in 1 oz of hard liquor, 1 beer and 4
ounces of wine. So, if someone said, "but I only had a beer", they
still had as much alcohol as 1 shot of whiskey. It just took them
longer to drink it, correct?
It pains me to see the media state, "people are drinking 'lighter'
these days, they're having wine coolers"
...but they're having 4 or 5 of them at a time. They are not soda
pop, they are not a "drink", they are a drug, just hidden behind
a pink, shiny label.
But officer, these are only wine coolers..... ARRRRRGGGGGGG!!!!!
Cathy
|
601.26 | women smaller = easier to be intoxicated | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | God is nobody. Nobody loves you. | Tue Dec 22 1987 17:51 | 12 |
| Re .23
Men (on the average) are larger than women (on the average). Thus,
typically, a woman will be more intoxicated than liquor than a man.
There are, of course, many individual exceptions.
I agree with .-1 about the ads for wine coolers. They are about
as alcholic as beer. Thus, if someone drinks 4 of them, they should
wait at least 4 hours before driving (assuming the mythical 150
lb person).
Elizabeth
|
601.27 | | VISA::MONAHAN | I am not a free number, I am a telephone box | Tue Dec 22 1987 23:44 | 16 |
| Absorbtion rate depends on a number of factors. In particular it is
slowed down by food, and speeded up by carbon dioxide. Champagne, gin
and tonic, fizzy American beer on an empty stomach give the highest
absorbtion rate. A brandy after a large meal is absorbed much more
slowly.
Once the alcohol gets into the blood, the rate it is metabolised is
not linear. If you actually survive the dose then it is almost all
metabolised within 6 hours, but allow for the variable absorbtion time.
A British government study (not well publicised) indicated that
people actually drove better with a small amount of alcohol - about
half the legal limit. By the legal limit they were back to the same
capability as sober, and beyond that were worse.
Nobody drives better with a hangover.
|
601.28 | addendum | YAZOO::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Wed Dec 23 1987 00:54 | 1 |
| and women who are on the pill are more readily affected by alcohol.
|
601.29 | Food for thought | 49200::BIZE | | Wed Dec 23 1987 03:58 | 15 |
| re .28 (effect of the pill)
Thanks Bonnie for mentioning that. I practically never drink, but
it's useful knowledge anyway.
re .alcohol level
I recently read an article in a newspaper, where the police had
arrested a lady weaving on the highway at 7:00 a.m. The blood test
revealed a level of 4.5% alcohol in the blood, which is a sort of
record, as it's the second highest level ever found in Europe on
a driver (normally people who have that much alcohol in their blood
are in ethylic coma). The lady was a teacher on her way to school...
Joana
|
601.30 | Sounds suspect to me | SSDEVO::RICHARD | Mike | Wed Dec 23 1987 12:24 | 16 |
| < Note 601.27 by VISA::MONAHAN "I am not a free number, I am a telephone box" >
> A British government study (not well publicised) indicated that
> people actually drove better with a small amount of alcohol - about
> half the legal limit. By the legal limit they were back to the same
> capability as sober, and beyond that were worse.
I would have a hard time accepting the accuracy of this study. ANY alcohol
in the body diminishes a person's capacity for quick reactions and sound
judgement. The only persons I can think of who would be helped by a little
alcohol would be those with high blood pressure or severe emotional distress.
In either case, they shouldn't be on the road. Can you cite your source for
this study? I wouldn't be surprised to find out it was conducted by a heavy
drinker :').
/Mike
|
601.31 | A good flick | DSSDEV::JACK | Marty Jack | Fri Jan 01 1988 14:28 | 9 |
| .9 reminds me of the best driver training movie I know of, which
I saw at the Andover Tractor-Trailer School:
Final Factor
The general idea is that a given accident is caused by a combination
of causes present at the time. It's dark and rainy, but you don't
have the accident. It's dark and rainy and you're tired, and you
do.
|
601.32 | | CADSE::GLIDEWELL | Peel me a grape, Tarzan | Sun Jan 03 1988 23:01 | 16 |
| Note .27 {A British government study (not well publicised) } reminded me
... The radio show Car Talk, on the Los Angeles PBS station, has
occasionally mentioned a drunk driver study, done the California Highway
Patrol. The patrol didn't release the study, but here is what it said:
Most serious accidents caused by drunk drivers involve a small set (under
10%) within the drunk driver population. The members of this set are people
who get very aggressive as they drink. Sober, these people drive 10 to
20 miles over the speed limit; drunk, 20 to 50 miles over.
The "happy" drunk may knock down road signs or hit others at 20 miles an
hour, but the happy drunk rarely kills anybody.
The lesson is: Be aware of idiots who drive like carousing teenages. (A
police clue: cars that fail to dim their brights as they come towards you
are often being driven by a drunk.) Meigs
|
601.34 | | ENGINE::CASEY | | Fri Jan 08 1988 11:23 | 44 |
|
My husband, who wasn't my husband at the time, was in a bad car
accident due to drinking and driving. It was almost four years
ago on the night that I graduated from high school. We were at
a graduation party and he had way to much to drink, and he is one
that cannot handle alot but will keep drinking until he drops.
Anyway, we were at this party and I was talking to a couple of
friends and I guess he got a little upset. He is a very jealous
person. Well he got in his car, which at the time was a little
subaru. He drove up and down the street, which has other streets
connecting onto it, he kept going back and forth, back and forth.
No one could stop him. I don't know what he was trying to prove.
Then he took off. At that point I knew he was going to get hurt.
Sure enough, about three hours later, my mother came looking for
me. She said he had been in an accident. Off to the hospital I
went. He had hit a sign and tree. The police estimated a speed
of 70-80 mph. I couldn't believe it. When the police were at the
scene, he was calling my name and the police were looking for me
they thought that there was someone else in the car. It seems,
and we'll never know the whole truth, that he came flying around
a corner and slid across the road, it was raining, and the side
of the car hit the sign. The police say at that point he was thrown
from the car and the car proceeded on to hit the tree. It's a good
thing he didn't have his seat belt on because he wouldn't be around
today. The car was demolished. We he arrived at the hospital,
it was awful because they couldn't do anything for him because
of all the alcohol in his blood. He had to lay there and suffer
until the next day. He had a fractured skull, lots of cuts and
scratches and a broken jaw. He looked awful. His was in surgery
for six hours while they attached his jaw back to the rest of his
face with wire. Now, for the rest of his life, he has those wires
in his jaw. His mouth after the surgery was wired shut for four
weeks. He couldn't even eat anything unless it went into a blender.
It was hell. I never want to go through anything like that again.
Even now after almost four years, he gets pains in his jaw. The
doctors also told him to be careful because if he ever got hit in
the mouth, his jaw would shatter like glass. Since then he has
been in a minor accident. He fell asleep at the wheel and went
off the road. You would think by now that he would have learned
his lesson.
Laura
|
601.36 | | ENGINE::CASEY | | Fri Jan 08 1988 13:39 | 8 |
|
Because if he had his seatbelt on when the car hit the tree,
he would of gotten crushed. The front end of the car was in the
front seat.
Laura
|
601.37 | | BEING::MCANULTY | _?_ | Fri Jan 15 1988 14:51 | 17 |
| > Since then he has
> been in a minor accident. He fell asleep at the wheel and went
> off the road. You would think by now that he would have learned
> his lesson.
> Laura
What lesson ???? Unless he was drinking the time he fell
asleep, I see no correlation between the two. Contrary
to belief, people may fall asleep, due to the fumes in
cars, and due to the combination of the heat/fumes. Not
neccessarily for driving when tired.
Micheal
|
601.38 | | ENGINE::CASEY | | Mon Jan 18 1988 15:34 | 9 |
|
Micheal,
He was drinking on this night too, when he fell asleep at the
wheel.
Laura
|
601.39 | | BEING::MCANULTY | _?_ | Tue Jan 19 1988 08:30 | 6 |
|
Thank you. I didn't mean to sound, like an idiot. I was just
trying to figure it out....
Micheal
|