T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
559.1 | My point of vies | AQUA::SAMBERG | | Tue Nov 24 1987 09:34 | 20 |
| Broken record time again.
From my point of view (technical salaried employee), Digital is
a great company to work for in that its benefits and working
atmosphere are great. A FULL-TIME EMPLOYEE, male or female, mother
or not, has a lot of flexibility, excellent benefits, a generous
leave policy.
I believe Digital is not great for the mother who still wants/needs to
work and contribute, but wants/is able to work part-time. Full-time
working mothers burn out fast. To me, 30 hours is about the maximum,
with travel time, errands, cooking, etc., to handle. Yet unless
an employee works full-time he/she loses all the leave benefits,
and unless an employee works 30 hours or more, he/she loses all
the medical benefits. I think Digital is beginning to understand this,
and are moving to solve these problems, and at least they are moving,
but molasses is faster.
Eileen
|
559.2 | | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | you may say I'm a dreamer | Tue Nov 24 1987 09:49 | 52 |
| Re .0, Digital may offer excellent working conditions for mothers
who happen to have professional level wage class 4 positions, but
would hesitate to make such a strong statement for mothers who are
secretaries or assemblers, for example. Many Wage Class 4 jobs
at DEC are jobs which allow the people who have them to come and
go somewhat as they please as long as they are getting their work
done, and this would be convenient for mothers. But, from what
I've seen in the past 12 years of working at DEC people who have
to fill out time cards or punch a time clock do not usually have
that freedom, whether they are mothers or not.
I will say that at least at DEC if an overbearing manager does not
understand that being a mother sometimes infringes on work, I have
seen personnel come to bat for employees. Two examples from my
own past: A few years ago when my daughter was in grade school
I got a call at work to pick her up at school because she had a
very bad nose bleed and she had become somewhat hysterical about
the blood. I was working as a secretary for an engineering manager
here at DEC. When I asked him if I could leave work 3 hrs. early
to pick up my 9 yr. old daughter who had a bad nose bleed, (keep
in mind as a WC2 I would not have been paid for this time), his
answer was, "Can't you just call a cab to pick her up." (I could
just imagine him sending his precious, more affluent daughter home
in a cab sick alone!) This was during the time that stories of
missing children were really being made a big thing of in the media.
I remember thinking, "Oh, just because I'm a secretary my child's
life is not worth as much as yours! Forget it, buster!" Needless,
to say I didn't work for this person much longer and have never
forgiven him his arrogance and thoughtlessness.
The other situation occurred earlier on in my time at DEC when my
daughter was still younger. At that time I was living 35 miles
from work. I had to get up in the morning get my daughter ready
for school, drop her at my mothers house to wait for the bus, and
then drive the 35 miles to work. I went through a period of time
when I always seemed to get to work 15 minutes late. I was a secretary
for a manager of product managers at that time, and he tried to
give me a verbal warning over this. I went to personnel, said I
would make certain I would get in on time and explained my reasons.
I have to say that personnel really came to my defense and I listened
to the personnel rep explain to my boss that everybody doesn't have
a non-working wife at home to run the house and that he should be
a little bit more understanding, suggesting that he might be a bit
late in the morning if he had to do all the things I did before
I came into work - dishes, laundry, garbage, get the kid ready,
get myself ready, etc. I didn't get a verbal warning.
So, there's good and bad at DEC. After 12 years at DEC I'd hate
to see what other companies must be like if we're one of the best!
Lorna
|
559.4 | all children are created equal | YODA::BARANSKI | Too Many Masters... | Tue Dec 01 1987 11:44 | 7 |
| RE: .2
""Can't you just call a cab to pick her up.""
Should have told him to do that to his daughter sometime!
Jim.
|
559.5 | Is this fair?? | USFSHQ::JBRINDISI | | Thu Dec 03 1987 15:56 | 5 |
|
Dec pays Wage Class 4 women 100% pay during maternity leave, but Wage
Class 2 women only get 80%. I guess Wage Class 2 women are only
80% pregnant?!?!?!?!?
|
559.6 | Is this fair?? | MARCIE::JLAMOTTE | days of whisper and pretend | Thu Dec 03 1987 23:33 | 5 |
| And Wage Class 4 women do not get overtime.
Wage Class 2 do.
|
559.7 | | ESD66::FRECHETTE | Use your imagination... | Fri Dec 04 1987 15:02 | 3 |
|
So we have to work the overtime to get the missing 20% ??????
|
559.8 | Things 2 Du-Du Today | FDCV03::ROSS | | Fri Dec 04 1987 15:28 | 8 |
| RE: .6
Joyce, Wage Class 4 men also do not get overtime.
Wage class 2 do (now that sounds funny when you say it out loud,
5 times fast :-) )
Alan
|
559.9 | Overtime?? | USFSHQ::JBRINDISI | | Mon Dec 07 1987 12:28 | 6 |
| re: .6
And how does one work overtime, while on maternity leave, to make
up that 20%. Also, keep in mind, overtime has to be approved. The
organization I'm in has just sent a memo out stating "no overtime".
|
559.10 | There is a reason for the difference | MARCIE::JLAMOTTE | days of whisper and pretend | Mon Dec 07 1987 12:50 | 29 |
| Trust me being a Wage Class 4 in the current environment is not
a plus. I have worked more hours of overtime as a Wage Class 4
than I ever was paid for as a Wage Class 2.
You are describing one situation where a Wage Class 4 has an advantage
which is specifically in Maternity benefits. Although it is not
required many women on maternity leave have continued to contribute
to the goals of the organization while on leave. They have terminals
at home and within days after birth are participating in the group
effort.
It is important to understand that being paid hourly and being paid
salary is based on government criteria. An individual who has specific
tasks to accomplish on a daily basis must be paid an hourly wage.
Digital would save many dollars and would like to pay us all a salary.
A Wage Class 4 individual works towards specific goals and projects.
Some of their working time consists of planning, organizing and
developing concepts and ideas. This type of activity is not always
turned on at 8:15 and off at 5:00.
I am not sure what the logic is around short term disability and
the difference between 100% for Wage Class 4 and 80% for Wage Class
2. One guess would be that it is the one benefit of the promotion.
I do know that the 20% you do not get is considered expenses of
working such as travel, lunches, dry cleaning, etc. The other guess
would be that as a Wage Class 4 you will most likely have to do
some overtime to compensate for your time out as your projects do
continue and not all the tasks can be accomplished by another person.
|
559.11 | Let's not argue | HARRY::BOULEY | | Mon Dec 07 1987 12:57 | 10 |
| Getting back to .5's question as why WC 4 get 100%
while on maternity leave and WC 2 only get 80% -
it is not a Digital phenomenon (sp?). It happens
at other companies as well.
I believe it has something to do with insurance -
does anyone know the *real* answer? I agree -
it does not appear to be fair.
|
559.12 | | NEXUS::CONLON | | Mon Dec 07 1987 13:28 | 15 |
|
RE: .10
In some groups (such as mine), there is such a thing as
a Wage Class *3*. Those employees get *BOTH* overtime,
*and* 100% pay during maternity leave. (Neat deal, eh?)
Unfortunately, as a T7S (Support Engineer), I'm a Wage
Class 4 Field Service Engineer myself (so I get to look
wistfully back upon my days of making overtime.) :-)
The Wage Class 3 employees in DEC have one of the best deals
(as many Senior Field Service Engineers will tell you.) :-)
Suzanne...
|
559.13 | No specific reason for the difference! | USFSHQ::JBRINDISI | | Mon Dec 07 1987 16:20 | 7 |
| re: .12
I just spoke to personnel and they said, "It's not so much a difference
in Maternity Leave, but a difference in benefits. Maternity Leave
is considered Short term disability, and WC2 only receive 80% of
their pay on STD." I asked her if there was a reason for that and
she said "No. Seems a little discriminatory doesn't it?" I had
to say "Yes, it sure does..."
|
559.14 | | USFSHQ::JBRINDISI | | Mon Dec 07 1987 16:24 | 1 |
| Sorry, previous response was for .11 not .12.
|
559.15 | | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | food, shelter & diamonds | Tue Dec 08 1987 13:29 | 23 |
| It has always annoyed me to hear WC4 employees complain about not
getting overtime. Overtime is the only benefit that WC2 people
have over WC4. First of all, *most* WC4 people make so much more
money than *most* WC2 people that even without the overtime you
are making way more than we ever could even with many hours of overtime
a week. The only exceptions to this might be project techs who
have worked their way up to big money and still get overtime or
some instructors who are WC4's but still don't earn a high salary
by normal WC4 standards. Otherwise, WC4 employees get more money
even without overtime, they get to set their own hours without to
an extent without being watched by a hawklike boss, they get as
has been said 100% short term dissability and maternity leave (which
must come in handy since their pays are usually more to begin with
anyway). Please, it's like hearing Imelda Marcos complain that
there were some shoes she just never got around to buying!
Why would DEC love to pay us all a salary and exactly why can't
they? I think part of the difference has to do with enforcing a
class system of sorts, and perhaps encouraging WC2 workers to try
to become WC4 workers so they can get those neato benefits, too.
Lorna
|
559.16 | exempt v non-exempt | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | The stimulation of eccentricity | Tue Dec 08 1987 14:07 | 31 |
| >< Note 559.15 by APEHUB::STHILAIRE "food, shelter & diamonds" >
>
>
> Why would DEC love to pay us all a salary and exactly why can't
> they? I think part of the difference has to do with enforcing a
> class system of sorts, and perhaps encouraging WC2 workers to try
> to become WC4 workers so they can get those neato benefits, too.
Someone else said that DEC would love to pay us all salary, and I
won't defend that statement, but DEC can't legally pay everyone
on salary. (I'm more familiar with MA, so the laws I refer only
apply here, but they're similar elswhere in the States.) There are
two classes of employees: exempt and non-exempt. These refer to
whether or not the person is exempt from the minimum wage law
(which also affects a lot of other things.) An exempt employee is
a manager (a person who can hire or fire others) or a "bona fide
professional", whatever that means. A professional seems to be
someone whose job requires a professional degree (doctor, lawyer
...) or someone who does a job under minimal supervision (That's a
poor description, but your intuition on who is a professional is
probably good enough.) A non-exempt employee is anyone else
(including secretaries, janitors, most technicians, assemblers
...)
Non-exempt employees are subject to the minimum wage, and must be
paid time and a half for any hours over 40 in one week. I don't
remember what other requirements there are.
Exempt employees are not subject to those laws.
--David
|
559.17 | An explanation | MARCIE::JLAMOTTE | days of whisper and pretend | Tue Dec 08 1987 15:06 | 40 |
| The state requires that individuals who perform tasks that can and
are accomplished on the job and can be measured....be paid hourly.
This is for the employee's benefit and prevents a employer from
hiring an individual on salary and giving them so much work that
they cannot accomplish it in 40 hours and they must work overtime
without compensation. As I said before exempt individuals skills
and tasks are not always performed on the job....and because they
work with less supervison have more decision making powers they
are not considered victims of such abuse.
Digital would like to pay everyone a salary not to save money but
to streamline the payroll system and to also consider each employee
a professional.
Compensation specialists are very aware of the government requirements
for hourly and salary wages. Several years ago many entry level
Wage Class 4's were returned to Wage Class 2 status. They did not
loose any pay and in fact made out well in the process. The reason
for this reclassification was to be proactive and to do this before
the government came and told us we were being unfair to our employees.
I do not make that much more than the high level Wage Class 2's
and in fact there was a time that a woman that reported to me earned
more than I did with two hours overtime. I consistently put in
five to ten hours overtime.
I also have a fair amount of supervision. I do not ask anymore
of the people that report to me than I expect of myself. In my
current environment where I only have one report I can afford
to be very lenient. When I had eight people reporting to me I found
it a little difficult because leniency also meant that some people
would take advantage of the situation.
I expect I might be going down a rat hole with this one...if anyone
has any questions off line I would be glad to answer them.
The question we really want answered is the insurance benefit question
is there a law around that or is that a decision of the insurance
company or DEC.
|
559.18 | Where are the unions when ya need'm | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | food, shelter & diamonds | Tue Dec 08 1987 16:10 | 19 |
| There is another benefit which WC4's have over WC2's, and I wonder
why this "rule" is the way it is. WC2 people have 12 paid sick
days per year. If we exceed that number be are not paid for extra
sick days. WC4 people have unlimited sick days. Why is this?
Just another added bonus for the college grads and those who have
plowed their way up to management, etc? And, if so, is it fair?
Shouldn't the extra money and lack of over supervision be enough
bonus?
Also, I know that if I have to leave to go the dentist, doctor,
registry office, etc., or stay out due to inclement weather, I do
not get paid for that time. I also know that WC4's get the same pay
each week regardless of whether they were there 40 hrs or not.
As for over time, I haven't had a job that required it in 4 years.
I, personally, feel there is too great a discrepancy in the benefits
granted WC4 and WC2 employees.
Lorna
|
559.19 | | FIDDLE::MITCHELL | Fiddle-sticks | Tue Dec 08 1987 16:59 | 29 |
|
Lorna,
You seem to have the idea that all WC4 people live and work in
some kind of high-income environement, where we can all come and
go as we please.
Maybe this is so in some areas, but believe me it is not true in
others. A person who has worked their way to a WC4 from a WC2
could very well be making less money than a WC2 that has just
joined the company.
You mentioned *setting their own hours without to an extent without
being watched by a hawklike boss*. Maybe so in some groups, but
again believe me, in others this is no different from being a WC2.
On *unlimited sick days*.....maybe so on paper, but in some groups
if you're sick you still come into work because the work has to
be done and you're responsible for it. If you are sick and out of
work you can plan on working evenings and weekends to carry out
your job responsibilities.
*Staying out in inclement weather*......Most times this has to
be taken as a vacation day, if one did not know that the storm
would hit and did not take work home with them for the next day.
The grass is not always greener on the other side.
kath
|
559.20 | WC is no bed of roses, either | PARITY::TILLSON | If it don't tilt, fergit it! | Tue Dec 08 1987 19:09 | 10 |
| >I also know that WC4's get the same pay each week regardless of
>whether they were there 40 hrs or not.
Yes, and we also get paid for 40 hours even if we work 80. There
have been many weeks during my career at DEC where I would have
made more $$ by working the same hours at Burger King. Many, many
WC 4 employees put in more than a 40 hour week on a regular basis.
Rita
|
559.21 | B.A. 1982, SDSU | CSC32::JOHNS | Yes, I *am* pregnant :-) | Tue Dec 08 1987 19:17 | 5 |
| And some of us "college grads", Lorna, started as WC2's and had
to fight our way up to WC3 and then WC4. I view the better benefits
in part as rewards for my tenacity.
Carol
|
559.22 | | COLORS::TARBET | | Tue Dec 08 1987 20:43 | 12 |
| But, folks, let's not lose sight of the fact (and I am absolutely
convinced that it *is* a fact) that people working in the secretarial
field such as Lorna does are often s h o c k i n g l y badly paid
for the contribution they make to profitability.
(And before someone come in blowing about how it's all due to The
Laws Of Supply And Demand, I would wish to point out the current
situation in Massachusetts, where companies are operating shorthanded
rather than rise the wages of their (largely female/black/young)
staff.)
=maggie
|
559.23 | A little gravy and some castor oil | IAGO::SCHOELLER | Who's on first? | Wed Dec 09 1987 08:24 | 30 |
| re:.-1
> But, folks, let's not lose sight of the fact (and I am absolutely
> convinced that it *is* a fact) that people working in the secretarial
> field such as Lorna does are often s h o c k i n g l y badly paid
> for the contribution they make to profitability.
I strongly agree with maggie. There is nothing that contributes more
to the smooth operation of an engineering group than a competent
secretary. Too bad I'm not a policy maker, secretaries would make
as much as some of the engineers 8^{).
re: .15
I don't complain about not getting paid overtime, I complain about
having to work it 8^{). Seriously, I know of some people who
effectively took a pay cut when they were promoted and went from
WC2 to WC4. These people had been putting in 60-70 hours on a
regular basis. I would not be surprised if the promotions were
given to cover up the fact that these people were overworked and
to reduce their cost.
re: .18
I recently returned to DEC from Teradyne. They are very fair there.
Everybody gets 15 days per year to cover combined sick and vaction
time. The theory is that most people who take more than 5 sick days
are "gold bricks". I'll take DECs policy with 12 sick days anytime.
Dick
|
559.24 | | FAUXPA::ENO | Homesteader | Wed Dec 09 1987 09:41 | 20 |
| And I have to get into this, too ...
I'm a WC2 Admin Secretary -- I work 40 hour a week plus, don't put
in for the time I throw lunch in my face while answering phones
and typing, show up on time in two foot snowstorms (with over an
hour's commute), stay late often (seldom requesting overtime pay)
because a manager didn't plan his project properly to account for
the time I needed to contribute to it. I do this was I AM A
PROFESSIONAL and a member of the team. I don't think I'm making
sacrifices, and I'm not complaining about doing this. It's part
of my job; it's what I do. But I do wish that I was paid for my
contribution, not for the title (which I share with people with
appalling skills who don't care about their jobs).
But at least when I go out on leave to have my baby in April, I
don't have to worry about if there'll be a job for me when I return.
DEC is desparate for decent secretaries (we are already recruiting
for my replacement and don't expect to find one in time).
Gloria
|
559.25 | so true | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | food, shelter & diamonds | Wed Dec 09 1987 11:41 | 14 |
| Re .24, yes, Gloria, there have been many times when I have worked
through lunch or stayed late because an engineer or manager suddenly
seemed to realize that he needed a set of slides and 50 copies of
a 20 page presentation for a meeting being held an hour from now,
but which it usually turns out had been scheduled for 2 weeks or
more in advance *sigh*. (To say nothing of the business plans and
engineering specs I've had to type in the past, which suddenly become
life and death situations, based on how soon the secretary gets
the job done, not on how soon the engineer or manager gave it to
the secretary! And trying to stay pleasant and sweet in the face
of it all!)
Lorna
|
559.26 | | CSC32::JOHNS | Yes, I *am* pregnant :-) | Wed Dec 09 1987 13:31 | 5 |
| I totally agree that secretaries and other people in "clerical"
jobs are undervalued and underpaid. My feathers were ruffled when
I perceived what I took to be a backlash against people in WC4
positions.
Carol
|
559.27 | Thou shalt not spoil the boss | SPMFG1::CHARBONND | I took my hands off the wheel | Thu Dec 10 1987 06:45 | 15 |
| re .24 lunch and phones - go to the cafeteria and STAY THERE for 30
minutes. It will teach your boss more about your value to the
organization than the eight hours you are there.
re. working late - if your boss has requested that you stay,
then overtime *has* been requested. Simply put it on your
timecard and don't say a word. And if he balks at paying it,
it's time to have a serious talk, meaning " I don't work
for free, and I *am* WC2 ". I never hesitate to put in my
hours worked extra, even as little as 15 minutes (.25 hours)
and get paid for it. It also helps to document your willingness
to "work extra hours to achieve department goals" for your
review :-)/2
Dana
|
559.28 | From one who's been there | MOSAIC::TARBET | | Fri Dec 11 1987 12:45 | 62 |
|
The following reply is provided by a member of our community
who wishes to remain anonymous at this time.
=maggie
=============================================================
Because I have just recently (5 1/2 months ago) gone from a W2 to a
W4, I'd like to make a few comments.
First of all, in my estimation, the most important thing about any
job is whether you get it done efficiently or not. In my 6 1/2
years at DEC I have had some excellent managers who have felt the
same way. These were people who didn't feel that their W2 employees
should be penalized for going to the dentist, picking up a sick
child or coming in late because of a snowstorm as long as you got
the job done. These were also the same employers who I gladly
worked through lunch or came in early or stayed late for without
reflecting this on my time card. The only manager I had that did
not feel this way was my last one. Thankfully my job was
disappearing and I was already in a full job search when she came on
board.
I feel that I am lucky that I was able to jump the hurdle (so to
speak) and obtain a new position that was a W4. This is because I
now have a better chance, according to personnel, of advancing in my
career. In actuality it my advancement from W2 to W4 was only one
step up from my last job since I was already at the top rung of a W2
in finance. I started with DEC in 1981 as an Admin Secretary and
became quickly aware of the fact that because of the salary ceiling
that I needed to direct my efforts elsewhere if I wanted to be able
to obtain any financial security as a single parent.
Within DEC there is a definite stigmatism attached to W2 employees
and especially to those who are Secretaries. People within DEC are
always com- plaining that there are not enough secretaries
available, but noboby seems to want to make any moves to make the
positions more inviting benefit or pay wise. In order for an admin
secretary to become an executive secretary and thus move up the
ladder so to speak, she must either change jobs or already be
working for someone who is high enough up (whatever that means) to
warrant him/her having a executive secretary. In my personal
opinion if DEC would reword the title admin secretary to
administrative assistant it would much better reflect what these
women/men really do and maybe more of them would want to do the job.
After all, gone are the days when the secretary simply answers
phones and makes coffee for the boss. Most supervisors get their
own coffee and type their own memos leaving their secretaries to do
jobs that jr. executives used to do.
Let's face facts if an employee is doing the work of a
"professional" why shouldn't she/he get the recognition and pay for
such. According to my dictionary the word professional means: Of,
pertaining to, characterisc of, or engaged in a profession; and the
definition of profession is: An occupation, esp. one requiring
training and specialized study. Okay, I guess that means that
everyone (with very few exceptions) at DEC is really a professional.
There goes the theory (as heard around DEC) that non-exempt people
are not professionals.
Next comment.
|
559.29 | back on track... | NSG022::POIRIER | Suzanne | Tue Dec 22 1987 15:14 | 15 |
|
Getting back to the original topic...A couple of months ago MS.
magazine had a list of the top 20 companies for woman to work for
in the U.S. Digital was not on the list. Each company was chosen
because of ratings in certain categories such as Maternity/Paternity
leave, flex hours, child care, pay/advancement etc.
I can't remember all of the companies... I will check at home for
the list...Kodak and IBM come to mind.
The only category Digital would score well on (in my opinion) is
pay/advancement. Some of these companies on the list had for maternity
leave a year off without pay but guaranteed their job when they returned.
Not bad!
|
559.30 | WC4 =<$ sometimes | FXADM::OCONNELL | Irish by Name | Thu Jan 07 1988 12:03 | 33 |
| I can't even recall which notes I want to respond to, so I'll respond
in general.
When I was promoted from WC2 to WC4 my income dropped roughly
$2000...the difference in the amount of overtime pay I was then
getting.
Re: Overtime. It is ILLEGAL for a manager to silently expect that
a project requiring overtime will get down without having to pay
that overtime. If you work the hours, legally, you must be paid.
Any manager or supervisor that ignores that fact is opening up
a nasty can of worms for DEC. That includes lunches you work through.
Even when I was WC2, my manager had supplied me with a terminal
at home so that if one of my kids was sick, or the weather too
inclement to come in (1 hour commute), I could still work on projects
at home and not lose the pay. It worked for both of us, because
I in turn, made it acceptable for him to call in the evening with
emergency slides or memos that HAD to get out...(it was either that
or come in at an ungodly hour in the morning...for me).
I worked hard for my promotion, and my boss was proud and happy
to give it to me. The dip in income is more than made up for in
the potential my career now has.
I strongly agree with the note (.24) that talks to the issue that
many Admin Secs are really doing the work of Administrative Assistants.
There should be a criteria established and a transitional WC4 entry
level position established for this role.
my-two-cents
Rox
|
559.31 | wrong reference | FXADM::OCONNELL | Irish by Name | Thu Jan 07 1988 12:14 | 3 |
| Sorry -- I referenced note .24.... I meant note .28.
Rox
|
559.32 | Unethical - probably, illegal - not sure. | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | God is nobody. Nobody loves you. | Fri Jan 08 1988 12:11 | 4 |
| I'm not sure that it is illegal to not pay overtime, unless the
hourly wage goes below minimum wage.
Elizabeth
|
559.33 | I Believe It Is Illegal For Non-Exempt's | FDCV03::ROSS | | Fri Jan 08 1988 12:25 | 11 |
| RE: .32
Elizabeth, if a person is "non-exempt" (in DEC, usually WC2), that
is, if he/she is not exempt from the Federal Fair Wage Law (or some
other crazy name like that), then, legally, they must be paid for
any extra time worked over a standard 40 hour work week.
Also, some states, mandate that non-exempt people *must* be paid
time and one-half (or double time) for working on Sundays.
Alan
|
559.34 | | HUMAN::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Mon Jan 11 1988 00:21 | 39 |
| Not only are non-exempt employees supposed to be paid for over-
time beyond 40 hours weekly, but for hours beyond 8 daily.
My wife used to work 4 10-hour days third shift. That meant she
worked 8 hours that counted as overtime (2 hours beyond the
normal 8 each day), and that there was a 15% shft differential,
her normal wage was 26.5% above her base wage. In addition to
that she di work real over-time (in excess of 40 hours a week).
Early in our careers that meant she made more than me since I
was a pretty poorly paid WC4. I also tended to work longer
hours than she did for no extra money.
This is the up-side of the protections that WC2's are not
exempted from. The down side is that after a few years I caught
up with her and am now making more than she ever could have
without changing jobs all together. (As it was she stopped
working for money and started taking care of the home and kids.
Talk about over-time without pay!) Just before she stopped
working she topped out at the top of the highest non-supervisory
job class in her field. Since she really enjoyed her work, that
meant she was pretty well stuck--leave the job she liked or get
only cost-of-living adjustments.
Depending upon where you either the up-side o the down-side can
appear more important. In the end WC4 is the better deal, but
that doesn't mean that WC2 isn't without it's good points.
As to the question of whether DEC is one of the best places for
working mothers, I suspect that we probably are and that this is
just another case where the fact that we are the best or one of
the best in a certain field is "a mighty soberin' thought" as
Pogo would say. It's unfortunately the case that our excelence
in some dimensions is as much of a sad commentary on the state
of the rest of the world as it is a matter of pride for us.
Close as we are we can see all the warts and how things could be
so much better, and all the time we lose track of how much worse
it not only could have been but actually is.
JimB.
|
559.35 | | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | Lyra RA 18h 28m 37s D 31d 49m | Thu Jan 14 1988 04:37 | 9 |
| I was in the same position as Jim's wife (in fact, at one point,
she and I were co-workers). When I was eventually promoted from
Lead Operator (WC2) to Shift Supervisor (WC4), my then-boss
managed to get me a compensatory raise (I was already past the
Supervisor's minimum) to make up for the 4 "lost" hours going
from a 4_10-hour-day schedule to a 5_8-hour-day schedule, but I
still missed the other overtime.
--- jerry
|