T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
551.1 | | TOPDOC::AHERN | Who, Dinny? | Tue Nov 17 1987 13:39 | 14 |
|
Place one teaspoonful of Drano in a cup of the expectant mother's
urine. If it bubbles, the baby will be a plumber.
|
551.2 | | BEING::MCANULTY | a | Tue Nov 17 1987 14:38 | 26 |
| > < Note 551.1 by TOPDOC::AHERN "Who, Dinny?" >
> Place one teaspoonful of Drano in a cup of the expectant mother's
> urine. If it bubbles, the baby will be a plumber.
What's that got to do with being a boy or girl. Didn't you
ever watch Green Acres ;-),
Seriously, Women can make as good as plumbers as men......
Well, I wonder if it's nice to be back after a 6-month
absence from Womannotes...I guess I'll find out later..
I heard if your wife is carrying the baby low, then it's
a boy, and high, it's a girl....
Micheal
|
551.3 | Wait and see. | MORRIS::WOLOCH | Nancy W | Tue Nov 17 1987 15:02 | 9 |
| I agree with .2. If the baby is carried low and most of the woman's
weight is in front, it will be a boy.
If the woman's weight is distributed more in a side-to-side fashion,
(I know its difficult to describe) then it is most likely a girl.
Good luck future daddy!
nmw ;^)
|
551.4 | At 'Ye Olde Medical Center' | ASD::LOW | Merge with Authority | Tue Nov 17 1987 15:17 | 5 |
|
You could always try the Ancient Ultrasound technique.. :-)
Dave
|
551.5 | | CSTVAX::MPOWELL | | Tue Nov 17 1987 15:28 | 27 |
| re .1
Thats funny!
re .0
I personally don't believe in these myths anymore. Not after everyone
insisted I was having a girl and I ended up having a boy. I think
the mother usually has a pretty good idea. Most of the time the
mothers feeling is right. But here some ways I have heard of:
Place some thread through a needle, hold it over her stomache, if
it goes around in circles 'Its a girl'! If it swings back and forth
'its a boy'!
I must be mixed up about the way the woman carries because I had
always heard that if she carries high and out front its a boy, and
if she carries low and AROUND its a girl.
I was told that if her face becomes very clear its a boy, if her
face breaks out its a girl.
PS- my friend tried the thread trick it went in circles, her face
broke out, and she is carrying low, she found out yesterday she
is having a boy.
Tanya
|
551.6 | old wives and modern days | STUBBI::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Tue Nov 17 1987 16:00 | 6 |
| There is a note on this topic in the parenting notesfile as well.
If you try any of the above methods (other than ultra sound) they
will be right 50% of the time. :-)
The only sure ways are ultrasound and aminocentosis (sp?).
|
551.7 | | CSC32::WOLBACH | | Tue Nov 17 1987 16:19 | 17 |
| Well, I had the "ring on a string" trick performed
on me....can't remember the motion, but it indicated
a boy. Then I did the Drano test (if it turns brown
it will be a boy, if I remember correctly)...it did
indeed turn brown. And those "in the know" were
certain that I would have a boy, because of the way
I was carrying him (sorry, I can't remember which
means which, it's been 8 years...) Anyway, I was
very disappointed in all these results because I
wanted a girl. Period.
The tests were all correct. I had a beautiful baby
boy....my disappointment lasted all of 3 seconds,
then I saw his face and it was love at first sight!!
Now I can't imagine not having a little boy!!
|
551.8 | | CSTVAX::MPOWELL | | Tue Nov 17 1987 16:44 | 15 |
| I believe that an amenocentosis (sp?) is probably the best way
of finding out, but they usually won't do one of those unless it
is medically neccessary. Because it can have bad side effects.
An ultrasound isn't really that reliable.
A friend of the families had an ultra sound done and it came
out to be a boy. SO everyone bought boy clothes, blue this and
thats. It turned out that the cord was what made the nurse think
it was a boy. I have heard of that happening a couple of times
when it is thought that the baby was going to be a boy. Now I am
sure if they say its a girl there shouldn't be any mistakes with
that.
Tanya
|
551.9 | | TOPDOC::AHERN | Who, Dinny? | Tue Nov 17 1987 16:52 | 13 |
|
Would there have been an Elizabethan period if Ann Bolyn had ultrasound?
|
551.10 | | SEDJAR::THIBAULT | Capture the moment, carry the day | Tue Nov 17 1987 17:01 | 4 |
| If she has backaches, it will be a boy. If she has stomachaches, it will
be a girl. At least that's what my mommy told me.
Jenna Pooh
|
551.11 | amniocentesis | ULTRA::GUGEL | Don't read this. | Tue Nov 17 1987 17:18 | 4 |
| re .6, .8: the correct spelling is "amniocentesis"
-Ellen, who *always* checks spelling in the dictionary before
writing anything anywhere, including notes.
|
551.12 | The only 100% sure method... | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | The Dread Pirate Roberts | Tue Nov 17 1987 17:19 | 5 |
| Wait and see.
Seriously, does it really matter which it is?
--- jerry
|
551.13 | Elizabethan Ultrasound | GNUVAX::BOBBITT | sprinkled with syntactic sugar | Wed Nov 18 1987 10:21 | 12 |
| re .9
If Ann Boleyn's mom had had ultrasound there probably wouldn't have
been an Ann Boleyn - I read somewhere she had six fingers on one
hand, six toes on one foot, and three breasts. Cries of "Witch" would
have taken her long before the guillotine.
Yet another useless bit of trivia ...
-Jody
|
551.14 | ..Let me OUTA here... | LANDO::ROGERS | Becky R. - Whirlwind Nightmare Life | Wed Nov 18 1987 11:28 | 14 |
|
re: .13
Is that really true?? Can anyone confirm?
That is pretty bizzare.....
As for the baby...I was always told that if the baby is really active
and kicks alot, it'll be a boy. Girl babys are more passive, according
to MY mommy....
Personally...I think my mommy is silly.....;^)
|
551.15 | Some of it. | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Wed Nov 18 1987 12:18 | 9 |
| Anne Boleyn had six fingers on one hand. (I never heard of the
other attributes.) Because of this, she started the style of
long, pointy sleeves that half-covered the hands.
When they were excavating in the Tower of London graveyard, they
were able to positively identify her body because of her
polydactylism.
Ann B.
|
551.16 | "...tucked underneath her arm" | TOPDOC::AHERN | Who, Dinny? | Wed Nov 18 1987 12:54 | 6 |
| RE: .13-.15 "multiple digits"
The six fingers and three breasts have been documented, but I never
heard about any extra toes. Too bad she din't have an extra head.
|
551.17 | Old Husbands' Tales | CSC32::JOHNS | Yes, I *am* pregnant :-) | Wed Nov 18 1987 15:08 | 10 |
| re: .0
Don't even bother with all of those stories. If you are planning
more than one child, then buy what you think is cute, for whatever
sex, and hope that at least one of them will wear it. If you are
planning only one child, or if you want to play it safe, buy things
that are unisex. Girls can often wear "boy's" clothes, but I suggest
that you DON'T put a boy in a frilly dress unless it is for
christening. :-)
Carol
|
551.18 | I think someone actually tried this scam | MAY20::MINOW | Je suis marxiste, tendance Groucho | Wed Nov 18 1987 15:39 | 7 |
| If you're really wondering, I'm offering a wonderful new service -- just
send me $20 and a lock of hair and I'll tell whether it'll be a boy
or a girl (father's or mother's hair -- no discrimination here).
My method isn't 100% successful, but I will offer a money back guarantee.
M.
|
551.19 | | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Wed Nov 18 1987 15:46 | 5 |
|
Nice one, Martin. That's right up there with "we'll teach your dog how
to swim for only $5."
JP
|
551.20 | Y | SALEM::REK | A new King will be born soon!!!!! | Wed Nov 18 1987 19:08 | 7 |
| Being new to all this I was wondering how other parents
tried to figure out what sex the baby was....
REK
PS Sal, the money is in the mail...
|
551.21 | REKette | SEDJAR::THIBAULT | Capture the moment, carry the day | Wed Nov 18 1987 20:00 | 4 |
| Don't worry REK, it's going to be a girl and she's going to grow up to be
just like you. HAHAHAHAHAHAhehehehe
Jenna Pooh
|
551.22 | maybe esp? | YAZOO::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Wed Nov 18 1987 21:25 | 4 |
| Well in my case, we 'knew' we were having a boy...and I was calling
my 'stomach' Michael by the 5th month....and Michael will be home
for Thanksgiving in about a week, from his first fall in college....
but as to why we 'knew' he was a boy...I dunno.
|
551.23 | | SSDEVO::RICHARD | Mike | Thu Nov 19 1987 02:02 | 12 |
| We have two boys - ages 2 1/2 and 5 mos. During the first pregnancy, I was
the only one who insisted it would be a girl. During the second, we were
both pretty sure it would be a boy. Judy says that she dreamt of boys during
both pregnancies; and that is what convinced her of their sex. I'll never
figure it out. I figure any method of determining the sex will give you at
least a 50% chance, so why not guess. My only disappointment in this whole
thing is that we are quitting at two, and so will probably never raise a
girl. I was really looking forward to that.
Re 0. I hope your husband changes his mind.
/Mike
|
551.24 | | SUPER::HENDRICKS | Not another learning experience! | Thu Nov 19 1987 08:40 | 7 |
| My aunt had some kind of theory about sleeping on one side or the
other before,during or (?after) conception, and that would affect
the baby's sex.
I don't see how it would work after, but maybe the people who developed
these "theories" didn't understand the biology!
|
551.25 | Some women just know | VCQUAL::THOMPSON | Noter at large | Thu Nov 19 1987 09:25 | 7 |
| My wife knew her baby was going to be a boy. Neither of us knows
how she knew; she just knew. She was right, of course. I read
recently that a very high percentage of mothers to be who 'know'
what their baby is going to be are right. No one seems to know
how they know though.
Alfred
|
551.26 | well, they were wrong about me... | GNUVAX::BOBBITT | a collie down isnt a collie beaten | Thu Nov 19 1987 11:02 | 15 |
| They were so sure I was going to be a boy, maybe because I was kicking
a lot, maybe because they wanted one so much, whatever...but when
I came out they had to scrap the name "James" and come up with a
female one. "Jody" was the logical nickname, but they had to think
of a "fancy legal family" name to go with it on all the legal
documents...they decided against Josephine and Joanne, and came
up with "Judith", but I don't really like to be called that. It's
strange to think they might have wanted a boy (didn't even consider
it until recently), but that could explain why I was a tomboy all
through school, was Ms. Fix-it around the house, majored in
Electronics, and went to a vocational high school and an engineering
college.
-Jody
|
551.27 | Selective successes | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Thu Nov 19 1987 11:07 | 12 |
| My two cents about all this is that people tend to remember their
"successes" with predictions and forget (or don't tell you about)
their "failures". Also, since it would seem that most couples express
a preference for a boy, and somewhat more than half of babies born
are boys, the odds are in favor of a lot of people having their
pet theories vindicated.
Personally, I favor the old "what side of the bed the man hangs
his pants on" theory. (I put mine on the floor - does that mean
that Tommy should have been a cat?)
Steve
|
551.28 | | BEING::MCANULTY | Open brain insert rocks | Thu Nov 19 1987 11:40 | 11 |
|
Re: Jody,
I'm sure you've made some happy that your a female though.
Re: Steve
Maybe not a cat, but a rugrat ;-)
Micheal
|
551.29 | Depends on cases...:-) | YAZOO::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Thu Nov 19 1987 12:12 | 7 |
| re .27
Gee, we knew the correct sex of all of our children well in advance
....unusual success rate?
of course that is because four of the five were adopted :-)
|
551.30 | we're all just guessing | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Thu Nov 19 1987 12:25 | 10 |
| If you REALLY want to know what sex the baby is, get tested. Anything
else is just guessing. Paul and I were both convinced that his
sister's second baby was a boy, even though her doctor had given
her a 60% chance of bearing a girl, and we were right - David Jacob
Mandel is about two weeks old now, a fine although noisy nephew to
keep our two-year old niece company. But we admit we were guessing,
and Susan herself (my sister-in-law) had no guesses as to what sex
the baby was until he was born. (The best thing about this birth
was that it was natural - our niece was a breach baby and a C-section
- poor Susan!)
|
551.31 | it doesn't matter | CADSYS::SULLIVAN | Karen - 225-4096 | Thu Nov 19 1987 13:09 | 8 |
| I wish people wouldn't worry about the sex of the child. All too soon
the baby will be molded into a sex role. You don't need to know the
sex to go out and buy cribs, diapers, sleepers, and all the rest of
the paraphernalia needed. Also, you should be careful not to become
to attached to the idea of which sex baby you will have in case you
have the other.
...Karen
|
551.32 | six for six on this one | YAZOO::M_KOWALEWICZ | Beware the Vorpal sword, my son | Thu Nov 19 1987 13:13 | 9 |
|
In bygone days, a friend had a girl, and then a boy. During an evening of
chit chat she allowed that her legs grew unusually furry when she had the
girl, not so when she had the boy. I have mentioned this to all pregnant
friends, and guess what....
KBear
|
551.33 | | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | The Dread Pirate Roberts | Thu Nov 19 1987 15:23 | 6 |
| re:.31
Thank you. I thought I was the only one who considers the whole
guessing game ridiculous.
--- jerry
|
551.34 | human curiosity | YAZOO::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Thu Nov 19 1987 15:25 | 6 |
| re .33 re .31
It is sort of like shaking presents and looking at the shape
of things that are wrapped under the tree...it helps make the
waiting go faster, and you are always just a bit curious about
what is in there, :-)
|
551.35 | | SUPER::HENDRICKS | Not another learning experience! | Thu Nov 19 1987 16:02 | 4 |
| I was amazed by my friends who had amniocentesis and decided not
to be told the sex of the baby! They said they wanted to be surprised.
I couldn't bear waiting to find out if the information was there
to be had.
|
551.36 | Don't get carried away with the game | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Thu Nov 19 1987 19:42 | 21 |
| Re: .35, others
Count me also as one who not only declines to guess, but who
does NOT want to know in advance, even if I could be told
with certainty. I think I've talked about this in PARENTING,
but my feeling is that there is a danger of some resentment
building before the child is born if the sex isn't the one you
would have preferred.
I think the surprise is one of the fun parts of having a child.
I was thrilled to be the first one to notice that Tommy was
a boy (or at least the first to say anything!), even if I was
quietly expressing a SLIGHT preference for a girl beforehand.
If you don't take it seriously, guessing, and testing yourself by
various folk tales, is relatively harmless (except for the Drano
trick - Drano is nasty stuff!) But even if YOU don't take it
seriously, your relatives just might. Once the child is born,
that's it, and you and your relatives will love your child for what
she or he is.
Steve
|
551.37 | | PASTIS::MONAHAN | I am not a free number, I am a telephone box | Fri Nov 20 1987 00:04 | 14 |
| All of our babies have turned out to be children, but two of
them are perilously close to turning into adults at the moment.
Since this is more or less what was predicted we do not worry about
it too much.
Seriously, the only reliable way of telling in advance is the
genetic analysis with that nasty long word that several others have
already mentioned.
In France the genetic analysis is performed as routine, since
it can detect some genetic defects and the mother can be advised
to have an abortion. While the advice is not based on the sex of
the baby, that information is available for any mother who is
interested.
|
551.38 | Knowing the Sex | CSC32::JOHNS | Yes, I *am* pregnant :-) | Fri Nov 20 1987 11:49 | 7 |
| I would love to know for sure, but since I have no other reason
to have the amnio, I won't take the risk.
If nothing else, if it is a girl then we can stop racking our brains
for boys' names that we want.
Carol
|
551.39 | so deep down I wanted a girl... | EDUHCI::WARREN | | Mon Nov 23 1987 17:02 | 13 |
| If you have only a girl's name selected...you'll have a boy.
If you have only a boy's name selected...you'll have a girl!
But seriously...when people asked me during my pregnancy whether
I wanted a boy or a girl, all I could think was that if I were lucky
enough to be able to choose something for my baby before its birth,
the last thing I'd choose would be its sex. First, I'd wish it
were healthy...then happy...then nice (compassionate, giving, etc.)...
then intelligent...then talented...then beautiful...
-Tracy, whose daughter is all of the above
|
551.40 | | SUPER::HENDRICKS | Not another learning experience! | Tue Nov 24 1987 08:53 | 32 |
| I think if people grew up and had good experiences with children
of both sexes they are likely to have the attitude that you do (.39).
As I was growing up, I had terrible experiences with little boys.
I didn't have any brothers, and I found the boys in the neighborhood
to be loud, fast, excitable, often violent, and preoccupied with
sports. I had no way of relating to them or playing with them.
My main memory of the boys in the neighborhood is getting hurt if
I tried to play with them.
When I babysat, I intuitively understood what made the girls tick,
and developed good relationships with them. Except for very musical
or very intellectual boys (who had something in common with me!)
I was at a loss to relate to boys. I couldn't get into or appreciate
their world.
Even as a teacher I found this to be true, although I worked very
hard to develop positive relationships with the boys I taught.
I never wanted a child, and I never plan to have one. But if I
did, I would be terrified of having a boy and not being able to
develop the kind of positive, loving relationship with him that
I could with a girl. I would hate to start something I had serious
doubts about being able to do responsibly.
This would be a major preoccupation for me, and a major concern
throughout the pregnancy. I would want to find out as soon as possible
so that I could get used to the idea if I had to.
I'm glad it's only a theoretical issue!
Holly
|
551.41 | | SALEM::REK | A new King will be born soon!!!!! | Tue Nov 24 1987 09:22 | 9 |
| I think some of the readers got the wrong impression. I want a
healthy baby first. I was just wondering if there were any way
of know ahead of time. I will be overjoyed with the baby, it doesn't
matter if its a boy or a girl. I will love this baby no matter what.
I know if I want to find out I can, I don't want to. I was just
wondering if there was a non-scientific way........
REK
|
551.42 | What's wrong with having a preference? | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | you may say I'm a dreamer | Tue Nov 24 1987 10:34 | 29 |
| Re .40, I've always felt much the same as you do about little boys.
Except I always wanted a daughter (first, I wanted a sister for
years, then that changed to a daughter).
My mother and I used to joke that boys don't turn into humans until
they're around 21 (and some never do!) :-).
It has been my experience that little girls under the age of 5 are
the sweetest, most loving people on earth. Usually if you're nice
to them, they'll be nice to you. As a teenager I had great success
babysitting for little girls. We would play games, have interesting
talks and they would always ask their parents to have me back.
With little boys, forget it! The little girls seemed to idolize
me, the little boys would shout "You're not my mother! I don't
have to do what you say!" (Nasty little buggers.)
The result was that I wanted a daughter very much when I was pregnant.
That's one time when I got what I wanted and I love having a daughter
and have no regrets about never having a son. I wanted a baby who
would grow up to have the same orientation as I do. I wanted a
baby I could dress in pink lace and name Melissa or Jessica or Vanessa,
and buy dolls and a canopy bed.
Of course, the most important thing is to have a healthy baby, but
that goes without saying. Hearing the doctor tell me I had a girl
was one of the happiest moments of my life.
Lorna
|
551.43 | plausible explanations | YODA::BARANSKI | Too Many Masters... | Tue Nov 24 1987 10:48 | 42 |
| I find it curious that many of the 'methods' for guessing the sex of a baby
are at least plausible...
The Pendulum trick would depend on the gravitational density shape of the baby
'round' = girl, 'long' = boy. This is related to the low & front = boy, high &
sideways = girl test. Backaches = boy, stomachaches = girl will also tend
to reflect the shape and position of the baby.
That male unborn are more active seems to indicate that there *are*
psychological differences between men and women other then conditioning.
The Chemical reaction to mother's urine, could be caused or uncaused by male
chemicals of the baby showing up in the mother's system, as RH factors do. Face
breakout = girl could be caused by added female chemicals in the mother's
system. Furry legs = girl could be for the same reason, but I don't know what
the mechanism would be.
The 'I just know' method... perhaps there is some mental link between the
mother and the unborn. Dreams tend to fall in this category.
The theory of sleeping on one side or the other, and the theory that having sex
before ovulation results in more boys, and having sex after ovulation results in
more girls, could depend on which type of sperm is more energetic, or lives
longer.
I can't thing of any plausible explanation for the theory of what side of the
bed you hang your pants on.
I think that guessing is part of the anticipation of the great event. I agree
that you shouldn't get too attached to a particular outcome, but that rule is
usefull throughout life.
RE: .36, (.38)
"my feeling is that there is a danger of some resentment building before the
child is born if the sex isn't the one you would have preferred."
I think that it's certainly better to go through the guessing games, and
imagining the outcome, then to ignore the decision. In my experience there is
more of a danger of resentment if you don't go through the guessing games.
Jim.
|
551.45 | Icky | IAGO::SCHOELLER | Who's on first? | Tue Nov 24 1987 11:49 | 16 |
| >< Note 551.44 by BUSY::KLEINBERGER "Have a MAXCIMum Day!" >
> -< Smiles all around !!!!! >-
>
> Hey Rick...
>
> Boys are "icky", and never find Happiness :-)
>
> Here's hoping for a girl!...
>
> Gale
Gee, that's what I'd always heard about girls :^{). Maybe they
all just have to grow up to be men and women before they stop being
"icky" and find some happiness.
Dick
|
551.46 | | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | The Dread Pirate Roberts | Tue Nov 24 1987 14:38 | 7 |
| re:.42
There's nothing wrong with having a *preference*. I only wonder
why some people feel it's so important to know beforehand which
sex the baby is.
--- jerry
|
551.47 | Not that plausable | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | There are no misteakes | Tue Nov 24 1987 16:06 | 17 |
| re .43:
>The Pendulum trick would depend on the gravitational density shape of
>the baby 'round' = girl, 'long' = boy.
Major problem with this is the strength of the gravitational pull
of a body as small as a baby (esp. a fetus in an early stage of
pregnancy. I seriously doubt there is enough gravitational influence
to noticeably change the movement of a pendulum.
The other problem with the "round" = girl, "long" = boy is that
within my own family at least, I was a very long, thin baby, and
my brother was very short, and looked very plump.
So much for that theory.
Elizabeth
|
551.48 | | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | you may say I'm a dreamer | Wed Nov 25 1987 11:32 | 14 |
| re .46, I just assumed that one of the reasons people would want
to know before hand what sex the baby is is because they do have
a preference, and they can't wait to find out if they're getting
what they want.
Other than that, if you know what sex the baby is you can start
buying appropriate clothes are fixing up the baby's room in a "sexist"
manner such as pink or blue.
Personally, I think it would be like knowing everything you're getting
for Christmas ahead of time. It's more fun to be surprised.
Lorna
|
551.49 | Ramblings, a little late in the game | HUMAN::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Sat Jan 02 1988 01:36 | 32 |
| We were of the "if you find out, don't tell us" school, too, but
somehow Selma was sure with all three boys that they would be
boys. She found that she always thought of and spoke of them as
"him". Actually, that's not quite true. Actually, we disquieted
lots of people by speaking ofthe baby as "it". It was a person,
but not knowing its gender we spoke of it neutrally--except
Selma would regularly say "he" without thinking and never
"she".
We'll never know how accurate her instincts for this are. We
lost the only baby she ever called she at about the end of the
second trimester. No idea if it reall was "she".
The one thing we did want to know in advance was how many
fingers they'd have. Polydactylism runs in my mothers family,
you see, and though we'd rules out circumcision as unnecessary
surgery, it is customary to remove the extra finger or toe,
especially if it isn't fully functional. The decision between
removing a working digit or leaving your kid a freak was
something I relly didn't want to have to make. My tendancy was
to say that working pieces should stay on. I'd have loved to
have known I didn't have to worry.
Most of our baby clothes were green or yellow. Almost no blue or
pink. The boys did wear some pink and some frilly stuff. Any
port in a storm, and besides peacocks are male, right? I'm not
happy about the way everyone is supposed to live to some
externally defined definition. I think boys and girls are both
victimized by intolerance of personal differences and an
insistance that we conform to specific external images.
JimB.
|
551.50 | I have twin boys | WAV12::GOLDBERG | Linda Goldberg | Wed Jan 20 1988 15:16 | 17 |
| I wanted to know. I didn't have a preference but am curious,
and picking names for all of the possibilities was TOUGH.
Twin girls - 4 names (first and middle)
Twin boys - 4 names
girl/boys - 4 names
I think that the accuracy of an Ultrasound depends on who
does the testing and what type of equipment is used.
When I had an Ultrasound at 25 weeks and was told that I was
carrying 2 boys, their was no doubt in my mind that I was. I
had been told by my Obstretrician that the Doctor that did my
Ultrasounds was the best and that if she told me what I was
having, that was what I was having.
|
551.51 | Sugar & Spice -V- Slugs & Snails | CHEFS::TWIGGJ | | Tue Feb 09 1988 09:19 | 16 |
| A friend of mine went to see a medium/spiritualist 6 months ago
and was told that sometime within the next 18 months she would find
herself pregnant and that it would be a boy. Lo and behold I saw
her last week, and yes she is pregnant, quite an accident I might
add, but she is happy all the same. It will be interesting to see
whether she has a boy or not.
I also had my tarot cards read for a giggleand I am supposed to
find myself pregnant shortly, just hoping they aren't true, for
the moment anyway!
Jude - Who apparently hung low (boy), who forced the needle back
and forth (boy), who made her mother suffer with back ache (boy),
who was incredibly active (boy) and was named Peter before entering
into the big wide world!?*!? (Not sure about the furry legs - will
have to ask.)
|