T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
522.1 | | KLAATU::THIBAULT | Is it live, or is it SIMUL? | Mon Oct 19 1987 10:05 | 2 |
| I think it's hilarious.
|
522.2 | | CSTVAX::MPOWELL | | Mon Oct 19 1987 10:31 | 6 |
| .1
Me too! That is truly one show that I can laugh thru almost the
entire thing! I am tired of sit-coms that aren't funny!
|
522.3 | Another fan! | VAXWRK::SKALTSIS | Deb | Mon Oct 19 1987 16:30 | 6 |
| It is a riot and I love it. In my opinion it is the funniest, most
enjoyable show on TV today. It is too bad that the major networks
haven't picked up on the fact that a lot of people want to watch
a sitcom that is just plain funny. We need more shows like this!
Deb
|
522.4 | sorry, wrong idea.... | NISYSE::LEARN | | Tue Oct 20 1987 01:09 | 12 |
| I think people were missing the point. (yes I too enjoy the show)
Question:
why do we find a show that makes men out to be...... and women
out be....... in other words GENERALIZES that men cant cook or women
cant cook or whatever.... last weeks show for instance, how many
people found that particular show offensive?
i as an ex navy man have been to a couple of "shows" as it were
and if anyone there touched the "girls" they were promptly hiked
out of the club...... but on the otherside of the coin, these women
were all over the "boys" and that was EXCEPTABLE! this is not a
tipical tv blow out of proportion, i have seen it for myself.
any thoughts??
|
522.5 | | KLAATU::THIBAULT | Is it live, or is it SIMUL? | Tue Oct 20 1987 13:22 | 12 |
| re:< Note 522.4 by NISYSE::LEARN >
But the bottom line is, it's JUST A TV SHOW, and it's not to be taken seriously.
If somebody finds it offensive then they don't have to watch it, it's as
simple as that. Yes, and I've seen male strip shows before and I think that
they're hilarious also. The audience is the best part (well, some of the
dancers aren't bad ;-)). If the dancers (strippers) don't want people shoving
money down their pants then they don't have to do it. E Gadz, people in this
world ought to lighten up, life is too short to be all stressed out.
Jenna (who thinks watching a man write his name in the snow is one of the
funniest things she's ever seen)
|
522.6 | | CYBORG::MALLETT | Situation hopless but not serious | Tue Oct 20 1987 14:21 | 38 |
| re: .4
As far as those "shows" are concerned, "acceptable" behavior
is dictated by local and state laws which, in their own
inimitable fashion, reflect the predominant "thinking" of
the area. Usually such ordinances reflect an attempt to
"protect the girls" while proscribing prostitution. In case
my quotation marks haven't made it clear enough, I don't
think highly of such shows; if anyone wanted a piece of evidence
to demonstrate that male-dominated society is a wasteland, such
"entertainments" would do nicely. Mind you, I'm not nearly as
offendend by an ordinance which enforces "look but don't
touch" as I am by the existance of the show that requires the
ordinance.
As for why we laugh, I'd hazard a guess that it's roughly the same
reason Archie Bunker is laughable; the character is human enough
to be recognizable while the character's attitudes and behaviors
are made obvious and absurd enough to be (usually) laughable.
Among other things, I think it's a "safe" way for us to see the
weaknesses in ourselves and begin to confront them; more or less,
it's the mechanics of satire.
As an aside (and to explain why I put in the "usually" qualifier
above), while writing this reply, I remembered a terribly
effective episode of "All in the Family" in which Gloria was
raped. I won't try to recount the show, but will simply say
that because most previous episodes were "funny", the deadly
serious ending of this particular episode was made all the more
compelling. Of course, M*A*S*H was also excellent at this
technique. It'll be interesting to see if "Married with
Children" tries it.
Steve
(Of *course* I'm qualified to be an art critic; I mean after all,
I've seen every Three Stooges epsiode AND every Daffy Duck cartoon!)
|
522.7 | Love 'em. | EQUITY::BRADY | Top-down junkie | Tue Oct 20 1987 14:36 | 8 |
| Love it. The babysitter gets orders to tape it if we're out!
The stylization of marital roles and bickering has always been enormously
popular, from Burns and Allen and the Honeymooners on through Archie &
Edith and now Al & Peg. Maybe these shows help us feel better about our own
relational, uhm, dynamics ;-}
The counterpoint between the Bundys and the yuppies-next-door is also great..
|
522.8 | Did you like "Too Close For Comfort" too? | PLANET::WATKINS | Don't mind me-low brain cell count | Wed Oct 21 1987 11:24 | 10 |
| You all liked it?
I saw it once, and found it to be rather lame. (Something about
how the couple tried to make time for each other in theri busy lives.)
I like a lot of other sit-coms, though. I like Growing Pains the
best, I think.
Stacie
(Hey! Caught you! Making a joke because of my "personal name??)
|
522.9 | Not Al and Peg! | EQUITY::BRADY | Top-down junkie | Wed Oct 21 1987 16:45 | 7 |
|
re: .-1
Sure you have the right show? Al and Peg Bundy spend most of their
effort trying to *avoid* each other in their relatively *empty*
schedule...
|
522.10 | Sick | CRFS80::RILEY | A Blip-vert in the making | Thu Oct 22 1987 00:01 | 11 |
|
I'm glad someone brought this show up. I got rather put-off over
the way Bundy (and neighbor) oogled the female repair-person, and
other stereotypical vignettes. My SO told me to relax and view
the program in the same light as "All In The Family" and "Mary Hartman,
Mary Hartman". (I find it hard to do that)
Of course, he went nuts over the dancers (Chippendales were they?)
and just about got busted upside the head by me! Sigh.
"jackin' the house", Bob
|