T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
486.1 | (don't tell me, show me) | JUNIOR::TASSONE | Cruise Nov 9 -16 | Wed Sep 23 1987 16:03 | 12 |
| Insight = "Love is versed but means more to me when it is shown"
In other words, actions speak louder than words.
Opinion = You both may love each other but you may need him more
for physical expression of love and he may not need that from you.
Advice = tell him how you feel but more importantly, SHOW him how
you feel.
Cathy (who dealt with this at the beginning of the relationship.
I never liked affection but now I thrive on it)
|
486.2 | Perfect! | CSMADM::WATKINS | | Wed Sep 23 1987 16:26 | 14 |
| You know how I feel!
I have made it known how I feel, but I refuse to "nag" him. I feel
like I shouldn't have to. Battles that are won by nagging are hollow
victories. I DO need more physical expression from him, not sexually,
but just gestures that express his feelings toward me.
The funny thing about this is though he doesn't show ME because
"his family isn't like that" and he feels like I should "know by
now", but he absolutely thrives on the displays of affection that
I show him. Maybe he's afraid it isn't masculine or something.
On second thought, he's not really all that concerned with the 'macho'
image. I just don't know.
Stacie
|
486.3 | Operator, I can't get through..... | SSDEVO::CHAMPION | The Elf! | Wed Sep 23 1987 20:03 | 16 |
| Stacie,
Have you actually talked to him about this? Have you told him how
you feel and what you need? Have you asked him how he feels and
why? His comment that "you should know me by now" caught my attention
the most. That comment is reflective of a common misconception:
mind reading. No matter how close a couple is, no one is so close
that he/she knows exactly how the other thinks/feels/wants etc.
His past upbringing is no excuse, though. If he knows how you feel
and what you need, this could be a sign of trouble. If this continues,
seek counseling!
I hope it works out.
Carol
|
486.4 | hugs are better than apples | CADSYS::SULLIVAN | Karen - 225-4096 | Thu Sep 24 1987 09:06 | 14 |
| I agree that first of all you have to talk with him (if you haven't)
about how you feel and ask him if he could try. Then don't
expect too much at once. I think one thing that might help is
to reward him when he does express affection. Tell him how
much you liked it that time he put his arm around you at the
company picnic. If you tell him what things he does that you like,
he will realize how much you like it and will probably do it
more often. Watch for the little things he does and let him
know you appreciate it. And don't stop being affectionate to him.
It's catching.
I hope it works out.
...Karen
|
486.5 | He might learn to like it too | FRSBEE::GIUNTA | | Thu Sep 24 1987 09:19 | 21 |
| I had the same problem with my husband when we were dating. I found
that by telling him that I needed more physical signs of affection
like holding hands and hugging, it brought the issue out into the
open. However, I also found that it didn't really sink in. What
finally worked was to initiate these things and to notice when he
did show some affection and make it clear that I enjoyed that.
One thing that worked well that still works is that we always liked
to cuddle on the couch, so I called this the "Official Cuddle".
Then, I could say "Official cuddle position please" and he would
make room for me on the couch and we would cuddle. Through the
years, he has managed to learn to actually like being close and
now he does show affection in public, though it did take time, and
I still could go for more, but that's because I am accustomed to
lots of hugs and kisses from my family, so that's sort of what I
expect.
Just give him some time and some positive reinforcement. Eventually,
he might even learn to like it like my husband did, and he may be
more at ease with signs of affection.
Cathy
|
486.6 | Some men can learn ... they just need some help .. | BETA::EARLY | Bob_the_Hiker | Thu Sep 24 1987 13:31 | 22 |
| er: .0
Well, I as going to suggest that you show him what you wrote in
.0, but Kathy stated a much better way.
Apparently Kathys beau seems to have had the same sort of upbringing
I had (more/less), but over time, a couple of valuable relationships,
I learned that *some* women require more attention than others.
And, even though I grew up as a 'loner', and learned to cope
as a 'loner'; there is precious little place for a 'loner' with
an exceptionally affectionate woman.
Fortunatly, when I need 'space' , she tries to understand, and backs
off. But when she needs that closeness, its time to get close.
Hopefully, since both needs are mutually exclusive, they won't occur
at the same time. :^)
Bob+3
|
486.7 | Cuddle Break! | ARGUS::CORWIN | I don't care if I AM a lemming | Thu Sep 24 1987 13:57 | 19 |
| re .5 (Cathy G.) and the Official Cuddle Position:
When Bill and I are doing things separately around the house, sometimes I'll
go over to him and call for a Cuddle Break.
Of course, I use some discretion, since cuddling with a soldering iron or
electric drill isn't as much fun. :-)
re .0 and the original problem:
Fortunately, I don't have any problem getting my fair share of affection;
Bill has sometimes asked if he gives me too much (never!!). I do think the
ideas expressed previously are good; making sure he realizes how you feel,
continuing to show affection to him (yes, it's contagious, and may become
more second nature to him), and letting him know when he's giving you what
you need. Prompts of "Cuddle Break" or "assume the official Cuddle Position"
might even work :-)
Jill
|
486.8 | affection is worth working for | CLOSUS::WOODWARD | I'm FALLing for Colorado | Thu Sep 24 1987 14:21 | 14 |
| WOW does this hit home!
I too went out with someone who at first was loving and affectionate.
Then, as time passed by, the affection drifted away. He blamed
it on his past, since his family wasn't into touching. Still, I
needed my hand held, and all the nice little romantic things. More
and more we became like brother and sister. Near the end, I was
asking for a kiss goodnight, which I gave up asking, since it
didn't carry the same meaning anymore. I decided to move on
rather than stick with the relationship. However, Stacie, you
sound like you have a great relationship and this is a little
bug that you can work out. Don't let the romance die.
|
486.9 | Hope this came out right | VCQUAL::THOMPSON | Noter at large | Thu Sep 24 1987 15:17 | 47 |
| RE: .0 It sounds like you SO comes from a family much like the
one I come from. Your complaint sounds a lot like one my wife
might make to.
I try hard to hold up my side in the deal but it's hard. Mainly
because we value different things differently. Different ways of
displaying affection affect us differently. For example, flowers
and random other nice little things mean a lot to my wife but not
so much to me. I try to do these things but it's hard unless I
think real hard about it. It's not a natural thing to me. I could
use more hugs then I get but hugging is not as major a way to show
affection in my wife's family. In my family it is a VERY big deal.
One hug from my father on arrival and an other on departure from
a visit will carry me for weeks because of how much it expresses.
In my wife's family they hug a little more but it means a lot less.
Or I should say, hugs appear to mean less because of how they're
done. Gentle things with arms not going all around. Yuck, what kind
of a hug is that for someone you love? It may look different to
my wife maybe I'll ask her.
An other thing I've noticed (and one reply here relates) is that
many women are a lot bigger on actions to show love then men are.
The way this gets interpreted by many men is "prove that you love
me." This is a sure fire way to make a man defensive as it attacks
his credibility. I know I'd rather hear my wife say she loves me
then "prove" it thorough gifts or tickle attacks or random physical
things. When a man says he loves someone she can either take him
at his word without demands for actions or you can accuse him of
being a liar. The demand for proof says "Liar!"
The thing to do is understand what an action on the part of your
SO means to him. (As a start anyway.) If saying he loves you out
of the blue is a big deal to him (as it is too me) then try to
appreciate that a big deal is being done. Also find out what is
a big deal to him when you do it. It's possible that you are doing
things that are little deals to him and yet big to you. (And the
other way around). Above all talk about what actions mean what to
who so that you both know what the other wants. If you talk only
about what you want you'll both get short changed. He may have
needs that aren't being met too and not be able to put his finger
on them as well as you have identified your needs.
This way you'll also learn to appreciate the other for what they're
trying to do as you both work toward giving each other what the
other wants.
Alfred
|
486.10 | looking at it differently | STUBBI::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Thu Sep 24 1987 15:34 | 3 |
| .9 When people want you to prove your love as you put it -
they aren't calling you a liar, but admitting their own
need.
|
486.11 | in public - NO WAY!! | PLDVAX::BUSHEE | George Bushee | Thu Sep 24 1987 16:08 | 5 |
|
In my case I have no problem showing affection, that is unless
it's in public. I love to hold hands, cuddle, kiss, etc., but only
at home and never in public. Don't ask me why as I don't know, I
just know I get very uncomfortable.
|
486.12 | I love him so much, but... | NHL::WATKINS | | Thu Sep 24 1987 16:12 | 19 |
| I just don't know what to do about this. Believe me, we HAVE talked
about it. I've tried being reasonable, everything. It's getting
to be such a big deal, mainly because it's one of our only
incompatibilities. If you have an otherwise excellent relationship,
that one little "flaw" seems like it's staring you in the face all
the time. I think I am making too much of it, but it really bothers
me. I have tried to "set the example" for so long, as well as
encouraging him when he makes me happy, but it all seems to pass
him by. It's gotten to the point where I am beginning to have
reservations toward showing him affection because I get so
"disappointed" when he doesn't reciprocate. I don't know what is
happening here. I have actually entertained thoughts of ending
the relationship over this matter. He knows how I feel, he knows
I have a need that is not being fulfilled, and though he says he
is "trying" it just seems like never enough for me. Maybe I'm getting
unreasonable about this, I don't know. I feel like I'm missing
something in this respect-something essential.
Stacie
|
486.13 | | FAUXPA::ENO | Homesteader | Thu Sep 24 1987 16:49 | 15 |
| re .11
Regarding showing affection in public, the reason a lot of people
dislike it is because they equate physical affection with sexuality.
Which reminds me of my (current) least favorite commercial. I don't
know the product, just to the punchline. These two adorable kids
are "playing house" and at the end the boy kisses the girl on the
cheek and she exclaims "Not in front of the children!"
Gawd! I hate the thought of children being taught that affection
is something that only happens in private, even within the confines
of the family.
G
|
486.14 | Potentially helpful model | CASSAN::TDAVIS | | Thu Sep 24 1987 17:13 | 15 |
| I don't know if this helps, but I have heard it said that people
tend to show their affection for another in essentially 5 ways:
1. Words
2. Gifts
3. Service
4. Physical
5. Time
Very often the two people's "normal" method of giving/receiving
affection don't fall in the same category. This can become a sticky
spot in the relationship. This model may help you more effectively
communicate your position and resolve the problem.
Tom
|
486.15 | I hesitate to bring this up, but...... | SSDEVO::CHAMPION | The Elf! | Thu Sep 24 1987 20:02 | 20 |
| re: .12 -
Stacie,
I'll confess what *first* came to my mind when I first read your
notes: insecurity. Perhaps you need to look to yourself for the
source of the problem. You're not getting enough of something and
you need to know why. A friend let me borrow a book that helped
me *a lot.* It's called "How to Break An Addiction to a Person"
by Dr. Howard M. Halpern. It's published by Bantam Books.
The general attitude about love is there are two people who fill
something that is missing in each other. My soul-mate and I do
*not* believe this. We believe that we are two complete people
who have joined to become "us" - not because we *need* to, but
because we *want* to. "Need", especially in this case, implies
a lack of choice or will.
Carol
|
486.16 | | HIT::WHALEN | Accidentally left blank | Thu Sep 24 1987 21:05 | 9 |
| In reading through all these replies, I've gotten to wondering if
I'm an anomoly among men.
I don't think that I come from a family that spends a lot of time
displaying affection (though I can count on a kiss from my mother when
I visit), but I enjoy very much holding hands, cuddling and kissing. I
don't care if it's in a private place or public.
Rich
|
486.18 | Sometimes it's the other way round ... | SHIRE::BIZE | | Fri Sep 25 1987 10:02 | 21 |
| RE. 16
No. you are not an anomaly amongst men, or maybe my husband is also
one! He is very, very cuddly at absolutely anytime, and I am the
one who tends to ask for a little breathing space once in a while.
RE. 0 & others
Try (and I know it's difficult) not to attach too much importance
to it. Or at least try it for while, and see if it get's better.
He could just be withdrawing in a sort of sub-conscious reaction.
If your relationship is really very good for both of you, maybe you
can "take him the way he is" as he may very well be "taking you
the way you are". That's what my husband and I have done and recog-
nizing that we have different ways of expressing our love has helped
us reach a great "togetherness".
Sorry if I sound preachy, but I guess my English is always a bit
stilted ...
Wish you luck. Joana
|
486.19 | I'm trying to "be strong" | NHL::WATKINS | | Fri Sep 25 1987 10:11 | 24 |
| I forget all the numbers to "Re: to", but I do agree that I am insecure
about this. The thing is, I never felt this insecurity in any other
relationship, romantic or otherwise. I do a lot of reading, and
even here in notes, I feel like I am less insecure than most people.
My peers all view me as a very strong person, which I like to think
I am, I get it from my mother. I love this guy more than I ever
imagined I could love anyone, and I really think we "have what it
takes" to make it. It feels very natural, and "right."
But I DO have this need and it hurts when he doesn't take it seriously.
We talked last night, again, and I'm crossing my fingers. He has
told me that he doesn't WANT to be like his parents, but if he's
not paying attention, it just happens.
And...after some deliberation, I have decided that I don't think
I am 'addicted' to this relationship, just that I see it's potential
and I want so very much for it to work. I don't think at my age
you see many relationships that you could realistically picture
yourself growing old and gray in. It really has a "permanent feel"
to it. Even if I'm not all that happy at this moment, I do know
that our problem isn't "non-negotiable" (thx. Alison) and I can
see a lot of happiness in it in the future. That warm feeling,
you know? I just need a little reassurance right now.
Stacie
|
486.20 | Immediacy | FLOWER::JASNIEWSKI | | Fri Sep 25 1987 11:27 | 21 |
|
You "love him more than you could've imagined"...
You're young ("at my age")
You're feeling "this insecurity"...
Nothing out of place that I can see! If you would take some advice
from an "elder" remember; "the heart has it's seasons" - Given time,
He'll come around...definately! The worst thing you could do would
be to "force" immediacy upon the issue, I think.
Even the most autonomous of creatures, my cat (Mr Jinx) will be
very affectionate - in his own time. I've no chance when it's
convienent for me "C'mere kitty! Lets sit together" (sound of
claws digging into the furniture...) but, he'll pick Saturday
morning, when I'm real busy with 10 different things, to say
"I want you".
Joe Jas
|
486.21 | Action! Action not words! | CSMADM::WATKINS | | Fri Sep 25 1987 12:41 | 18 |
| I wouldn't be looking for immediacy if I hadn't waited so long already.
I have already done what you have suggested. I have made my feelings
known and sat back and waited. For months. I have given him a
little more gentle prodding and encouraged him more than usual over
the past few, just to make sure he's getting the message. Now,
I find myself "settling" for behaviors that I wouldn't have considered
all that great before.
I'm really getting at the end of my rope with this, that's why the
demand for results. I don't want to change his "life" overnight,
but all I need is a little visible effort to keep me encouraged.
We talked last night and he knows it's do or die at this point,
so let's see what happens. He knows the stakes, if he tries, i'll
be thrilled, if he doesn't he's not worth it. It's so hard for
me to talk about him so detachedly, but I am tired of crying about
it and I have to face up to the facts if I want to maintain my self
respect.
Stacie
|
486.22 | | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | | Fri Sep 25 1987 12:51 | 15 |
| Stacie,
Is it possible that what you're really asking for is reassurance
that your sweetie can imagine growing gray with you? In other words,
now that you've decided that this guy is a potential long-termer,
are you needing him to let you know he feels the same way? (That's
a scary thing to ask for).
Also, someone mentioned "seasons". it's helpful for me to remember
that i don't always need at the same level of intensity. and when
i'm unhappy about a part of my relationship (or the whole thing),
it helps to remember that i don't ALWAYS feel that way.
let us know how things go.
liz
|
486.24 | | ARMORY::CHARBONND | TANSTAAFL -The HOT New Diet Plan | Fri Sep 25 1987 13:18 | 1 |
| RE .21 Good luck, Stacie.
|
486.25 | physical touch = survival | ULTRA::G_REILLY | | Fri Sep 25 1987 13:58 | 25 |
|
This is how I feel.
For me, physical expression of affection is absolutely necessary
between my husband and I. It is necessary for me to survive.
Part of me whithers up and dies without physical contact. I've
been in relationships in the past with minimal to no physical
contact, so I know how I react from experience. A relationship
is not whole and viable for me without a lot of physical expression
of affection.
For me it is not a case of needing affirmation that the relationship
is there, or of feeling insecure. I simply need physical contact.
I am surprized to find that this is not the case with many other people.
I am not devaluing anyone. I am merely expressing surprize. Whatever
works for you all is fine.
Please help me to understand why physical contact is not as important to
some of you as other things.
Also, are there other people out there who need to be touched?
alison
|
486.26 | | SPIDER::PARE | What a long, strange trip its been | Fri Sep 25 1987 14:17 | 1 |
| yes Alison, I agree with you completely.
|
486.27 | of course | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | | Fri Sep 25 1987 15:10 | 8 |
| re .25
yes! i need touching, too. i need more when i'm feeling unloved
or unwanted or generally blue. and when my partner doesn't touch
first, it's better to ask for it than to frantically crave it.
although i still like a lot of touching, it's a little less critical
than it used to be -- probably a sign that my life is slowly improving.
liz
|
486.28 | To love someone, is to love yourself - first! | JUNIOR::TASSONE | Cruise Nov 9 -16 | Fri Sep 25 1987 16:46 | 53 |
| I feel for you Stacie. This must be terrible for you. But, if
I may share one thing with you, it would be this. The good ole
Serenity prayer. It works for most (if not all) situations:
God grant me the Serenity to Accept the things I cannot change,
To Change the things I can,
And the Wisdom to know the difference.
I know these are just words to you, but accept their meaning for
just a moment. Think about them. We've (fellow noters in WOMANNOTES)
have discussed how much or how often or how little we try to change
the man/woman we love. When I first met George, I tried to change
certain things about him (clothes, the cologne he wore, the way
he ate certain foods and how he used to chew ice in my ear) and
yes, this drove me bananas. But quess what? Everything else about
him was wonderful and these THINGS didn't matter after awhile.
I told him this later on and we laugh.
Relating to the topic at hand, plenty of people in this file have
already advised you. There's some good stuff in here. I'm really
listening today and have learned alot. *I* hated affection because
anytime I got some (while growing up), I used to think that I had
to "give" something in return (my dolls, my candy, and when I got
older, my body). After 3 years of counseling, I've learned that
maybe, just maybe, someone loved me for ME and not for what I had
or what I could give them. That stemmed from my inability to trust
another human being. I trust now, but not as well as I could.
I'm workind that issue.
But Stacie, I learned to love, and hug and more importantly, BE HUGGED.
Who knows, maybe your SO doesn't want to because he doesn't know
how to (accept it from you). He might have some private issues
he's not willing to throw into the relationship for fear you might
think something badly of him. Now you can't go guessing and you
can't go changing. If "he" has the problem with hugging (which
*I* did), he has to want to change himself. And more coercion on
your part will definately put him out of the picture. I don't want
that to happen to you. As I didn't want my insecurity to drive
George away from me.
Now, I accept it and *I'm* hugging more. Even George's parents,
who aren't my in-laws yet, but I feel their warmth each time. So,
I give it back.
You are a giving person Stacie. You want to be appreciated. You
can see love in different ways (as someone stated). But if you
need physical touching more and your SO is not "ready" to give to
you for whatever reason, maybe you need a "Stacie" break to sort
things out. Take some time to hug yourself for a change. Everyone
needs to do that. It feels good to just wrap your arms around
yourself, squeeze for a few minutes, let go and say, "I love me!"
Cathy (a friend)
|
486.29 | Progess Report! | NFL::WATKINS | | Mon Sep 28 1987 08:40 | 5 |
| I am happy to report we just had a wonderful weekend, and he was
a new person!
Just let it last!!!
Stacie
|
486.30 | Complimentary Schismogenesis | MDVAX3::RHOTON | John Rhoton - SWS St. Louis | Fri Oct 02 1987 19:58 | 38 |
|
I hate to say anything at this point since .29 seems to indicate
that the problem has disappeared, but I just read this note now
and was quite intrigued by it since the exact situation was described
in a book I read recently called "That's not what I meant" by Dr.
Deborah Tannen.
She considers this an instance of what is technically called
'complimentary schismogenesis'. An example of this would be if
two people are conversing at different levels of volume. It has
been shown that in this situation frequently the person who is speaking
louder tend to increase his/her volume as an indirect way of saying
"Speak up so I can here you" and the person who is speaking more
softly will decrease his/her volume as a way of saying "The whole
world doesn't have to hear our conversation". Therefore, the
difference in their levels of volume increases instead of decreasing
as might be expected.
Tannen applies this same principle to different levels in display
of affection. The partner who is accustomed to less affection in
a relationship will feel that there is enough (or even too much)
affection in the relationship and reciprocating it will only encourage
the other partner to display even more affection. The other partner
feels that there is not enough and that the only way to get the
other the respond is to display more affection in the hope that
it will catch on.
I don't know whether this is what is happening in .0's situation
or not but I thought it was an interesting approach in that the
remedy is exactly the opposite the intuitive solution which has
been given in many of the replies (display less, not more affection).
Whether or not you agree with the particular concept above, I strongly
recommend the book (Ballantine Books, 1986; ISBN 0-345-34090-6)
to anyone who has ever experienced communication problems (for those
who have not there is a book on honesty I could recommend ...).
John_who_feels_a_bit_strange_writing_in_a_female_notes_file
|