T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
448.1 | a little trivia | STUBBI::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Wed Aug 19 1987 17:17 | 12 |
| For most people an engagement ring alone on the left hand means
that the woman is engaged but not married. After the wedding
she will wear a wedding band and then the engagement band on
the same finger of the left hand traditionally. In many European
countries the engagement ring is a wedding ring worn on the right
hand which is shifted to the left during the wedding. And the third
finger of the left hand is chosen because of the way our circulatory
system is set up. The ancients thought that the blood vessel leaving
that finger connected it most directly to the heart - the "organ
of love".
Bonnie J
|
448.2 | More trivia | HUMAN::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Wed Aug 19 1987 23:47 | 6 |
| In still other European countries, the engagement ring is worn
alone on the left hand while the woman is engaged and not
married and then moved to the right hand, being replaced on the
left with a wedding ring.
JimB.
|
448.3 | | PIWACT::KLEINBERGER | MAXCIMize your efforts | Thu Aug 20 1987 08:33 | 20 |
| Yet another question, (or comment ;-)...)...
I was married for 13 years... for 13 years I wore a ring on my
"ring" finger on my left hand. I just bought a mothers ring,
and put it on my ring finger of my right hand. After a week, I
was going crazy!!!! My hand felt soooooo weird, and my left habd
felt so naked, that I went and got it (down)sized to fit my left
hand...
Other have said, how can you wear a ring on that finger... its supposed
to tell others whether you're married or not.... I figure, if someone
wants to date me, they will "bother" themselves to find out IF I'm
married or not...
Do you see this as a taboo?.... are you truly supposed to wear only
your wedding ring there?.... So you know of others who don't?...
Just curious...
GLK
|
448.4 | ring can be repellant | ARMORY::CHARBONND | Post No Bulls | Thu Aug 20 1987 09:23 | 4 |
| When i see a ring on the left 'ring' finger of a woman, I assume
the woman is 'involved' with someone, degree determined by ring
style. And if it doesn't mean anything, the woman is sending
the wrong signals. To *me*.
|
448.5 | & bells on her toes | GNUVAX::QUIRIY | Noter Dame | Thu Aug 20 1987 10:24 | 8 |
|
Hmm. I wear many different rings in any combination on whatever
fingers suit them. I wear my plain silver band on my right hand,
though, and wouldn't want to wear it on my left hand "ring finger"
because it looks too much like a wedding band. But any other type
of ring is OK.
CQ
|
448.6 | if you're not sure - by all means ask! | LEZAH::BOBBITT | face piles of trials with smiles | Thu Aug 20 1987 10:37 | 12 |
| re .4 (I think)
Please don't judge the degree of commitment by what ring a woman who
seems committed has there. I mean, I never wore a ring on that finger
until I got "serious" with someone (although this is not the way of all
women). My engagement ring is a simple amethyst in a 10K
band...$ometime$ they've got it, $ometime$ they don't :-)... but I
wouldn't consider myself any more in love were it a 2 Karat diamond in
a platinum setting.
-Jody
|
448.7 | Customs Do Vary | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | I miss my vacation | Thu Aug 20 1987 10:49 | 6 |
| In "my country" :-) a divorced woman wears 8 antique rings at all
times. All this means is that she considers Victorian style rings
to be among the most beautiful creations of humankind.
Lorna
|
448.8 | A Conscious Decision | GCANYN::TATISTCHEFF | | Thu Aug 20 1987 12:27 | 9 |
| My grandmother gave me a diamond/platinum/pearl ring on my 16th
birthday. Sort of one of the last heirlooms from way back in Russia.
At first I wore it all the time (on my middle finger) so I wouldn't
lose it. When I got to college (high male population), it went
onto my "engagement" finger to scare off men, to discourage them
from hitting on me. It worked. When I didn't want them to leave
me be, I simply removed the ring.
Lee
|
448.9 | | BAGELS::LANE | We're on a road to nowhere | Fri Aug 21 1987 10:14 | 12 |
| Before I was with my SO I used to alway look at a man's ring finger
if I was interested in him. If he had a plain band I assumed he
was married, if he had another ring there I would check into the
situation to find out if he was married or engaged, same with no
ring at all.
I wear rings on both hands and always have. I also avoid a plain
band on my wedding finger except if I want someone to think that
I'm married, like when going to a club. If someone is really
interested they'll check into it.
Debbi
|
448.10 | | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Fri Aug 21 1987 11:55 | 7 |
| If I saw what looked like a wedding ring on a woman's finger,
I would not "check into it" no matter how interested I was.
Instead I'd look elsewhere for a woman who wasn't sending "stay
away from me" signals. Clearly the risk of rejection is much
higher in such cases. I don't care for head games like that.
Steve
|
448.11 | college rings | VIDEO::TEBAY | Natural phenomena invented to order | Fri Aug 21 1987 12:18 | 13 |
| I sometimes wearr rings on both hands. However, I have my
Grandmother's engagement ring which is a cluster of diamonds
in platium and 18K gold. I never wear this ring on my left
finger. Usually I wear my college class ring on my left finger.
A male friend of mine a long time ago said that if anything
resembling an engagement or wedding ring was on the left hand
that woman was off limits. I also found wearing my college
ring seem to make some men think I was more "serious" about
business. So at work it is usually my college ring
on th left and my Grandmother's ring on the right.Out of
work it is liable to be anything but never anything on the
left that look's married (or about to be).
|
448.12 | Ring on 4th = stay away | SED750::KORMAN | TGIF | Fri Aug 21 1987 13:37 | 5 |
| Certainly in England, anything that looks like a wedding or engagement
ring will prevent approaches from most men - we wouldn't usually
bother to 'check it out'.
Dave K
|
448.13 | Rings and things | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Fri Aug 21 1987 13:57 | 21 |
| I almost never wear rings anymore, even my wedding ring, because
I have terrible allergies, and dirt, soap, pollen, etc., getting
caught under the rings cause my skin to break out very badly --
seems to especially be a problem with dishwashing detergent. The
only time this was a problem was when we tried to book into one
hotel in Israel which had managed to reserve us TWO rooms since
we had TWO names. I don't speak a lot of Hebrew, and Paul doesn't
speak much more than I do, but we finally figured out that they
wanted to see my wedding ring before they would fix the rooms!
The wedding ring, and Paul's also, was at home in the safe deposit
box (not that they are especially expensive rings, but it was a
good place to leave them since I had to fetch the passports from
it anyhow) at the bank. Luckily, we had a companion who spoke good
Hebrew. I don't know what she told them, but they fixed things
-- she also is a married lady who uses her birth name.
I LIKE to wear rings, actually, but I don't dare wear one for more
than a few hours, and it had better be real gold or silver even
then - alloys with copper in them cause a real bad problem.
/Charlotte
|
448.14 | | HARDY::HENDRICKS | Not another learning experience! | Fri Aug 21 1987 13:58 | 1 |
| I don't think I have ever noticed what hands people wore rings on!
|
448.15 | Rings and Ads... | TSG::BRADY | No good deed goes unpunished... | Fri Aug 21 1987 14:20 | 6 |
| In crossreference to Note 446 on advertising - ever notice how
in many ads both TV and printed, they are always careful to show the
wedding ring on the woman's hand if she's doing/advertising certain
things - for example, if she's shown with children, or in an obvious
co-habitation scene, or advertising birth control products...of course
single women don't do/need any of these things...
|
448.16 | | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Fri Aug 21 1987 15:48 | 8 |
| Re: .15
There was once a furor over a mattress ad that showed a man and
a woman together on the mattress. The fuss? She wasn't wearing
a wedding ring. The ad was quickly replaced with a variant that
had her wearing a ring. This was some 5-10 years ago.
Steve
|
448.17 | | RAINBO::IANNUZZO | Catherine T. | Mon Aug 24 1987 11:21 | 4 |
| I wear a silver dragon on my left ring finger -- what does that say
about my "status"? ;-) I wear none on my right hand -- a habit from my
years of fencing (keep the weapon hand free).
|
448.18 | | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Mon Aug 24 1987 11:36 | 10 |
| Re: .17
If the ring I see on the left ring finger is a plain band or
has a diamond or other bright gem in it, I assume it means the
wearer is unavailable. If she is wearing another sort of ring,
and if I am very interested, I may try to find out in other ways.
Please understand the fear and risk of rejection is very high
in such cases.
Steve
|
448.19 | Dragon on the left hand? Married, of course. :-) | DSSDEV::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Mon Aug 24 1987 13:41 | 28 |
| Like Catherine, I wear a silver "dragon" on my left ring finger.
Mine's a wedding ring. It's also really a serpent, and not a
classic dragon (no wings or claws).
When we were getting married I spent almost all of my ring
budget on my wife's wedding ring. The engagement ring I gave her
was my grandmother's. It is platinum with a moderate-sized
diamond and some very nice detail work. I couldn't go with
a standard yellow-gold band. Since I couldn't find platinum
within my price range (give or take an order of magnitude),
I settld for antique white gold in a cherry-blossum pattern.
With the remaining $8, I bought a very simple broad sterling
silver band for me and had it sized down. After a couple of
years the silver solder gave out and my wedding ring had a gap
in it. After several years of feeling that a broken wedding ring
was lousy symbolism, I had a friend (Darlene Coultrain for you
SF fans) melt it down and recast it into a more interesting
shape--the classic worm swallowing his own tail, symbol of
eternity.
Some of my Christian friends blanch at the though of a serpent
or dragon shaped wedding band, but I refuse to give up a
perfectly good symbolism just because one religion or another
has misused it at some time or another. After all Christianity
isn't the only religion to use the cross, dove or fish.
JimB.
|
448.20 | | WATNEY::SPARROW | I mumble clearer now! | Tue Aug 25 1987 17:36 | 8 |
| I've had people ask me about what school I went to when they see
the ring on my left hand, ring finger. I tell them it was the
school of hard knocks....
Its my Army ring.
vivian
|
448.21 | | PASTIS::MONAHAN | I am not a free number, I am a telephone box | Fri Aug 28 1987 07:06 | 8 |
| Before I was married I worked in an electronics research laboratory
with someone who had worn a wedding ring. It had accidentally touched
against the terminals of a 5 volt power supply, and welded itself
there. He got his hand free when the ring melted.
When I was married, my wife offered me a ring, and I refused.
If she were working in that sort of environment, I would urge her
not to wear a ring either.
|
448.22 | Look mama, no rings ! | SHIRE::BIZE | | Mon Aug 31 1987 05:53 | 30 |
| I have been married for 7 years (or is it 8 ?) with a man with whom
I had previously lived for 3 years. Neither of us wears a wedding
ring, and we never look at the way people wear their rings (right
and, left hand, any finger) except to comment on the beauty of a
ring.
I find it fairly astonishing that people will wear pseudo-wedding
rings to keep people away, or that people will be frightened off
by a wedding ring. Is the symbolism still that much alive? I rather
thought this was something of the past, and that most people nowadays
couldn't be bothered: they wear rings if they like them, and on
their ring-finger because it's practical.
Mind you, I also find it astonishing that people who never go to
church should marry in the church, or that the lady should wear
white, except if she likes the color !
I married on a Wednesday, in a beige maternity dress (6 months gone),
without rings and without involving the church in something my husband
and I thought was a completely private matter.
Seeing what happens around us, I still think we are more married
than most people carrying wedding bands and having their marriage
picture in the middle of the living-room table !
Sorry if I'm rambling, but I'm just back from vacation, and this
felt just like the sort of note you respond to when you don't feel
like starting work!
Joana
|
448.23 | now where was that? | IMAGIN::KOLBE | Stuck in the middle again | Wed Sep 02 1987 00:47 | 3 |
| re:22 - I certainly agree. Neither I nor my husband wear wedding rings and
it never occured to me to look for wedding rings on people's hands (I suppose
that makes you wonder where I do look for them!). liesl
|
448.24 | who cares? | ASD::HOWER | Helen Hower | Fri Sep 18 1987 18:37 | 8 |
| re: .22, .23
Um, maybe those of us who check are more interested in "using" the
result? If you're already married, it isn't as important whether
someone you're interested in (presumably of the opposite sex) is
married or not! :-)
Helen
|