T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
363.1 | Who said 'thin is in'? | VICKI::BULLOCK | Living the good life | Wed Jul 01 1987 11:28 | 15 |
| I'm so glad to see this note! I have fought the "thin-thin" issue
for years. Do you know that many "larger size" fashions start at
size 12?? I always thought that was NORMAL!! The older I get,
the more I want to be healthy, and that doesn't always mean thin.
I was raised in a family where you got laughed at if you gained
weight--really helps you to keep a healthy attitude, doesn't it?
I realize that fashion, advertising, etc. all go to work on our
minds. Hopefully, as we become more in tune with our bodies and
minds, we will concentrate on what is right and healthy for each
of us.
Let's not put MORE pressure on ourselves!
Jane
|
363.2 | I think I'll have a donut now (oops that's "...Karen") | CADSYS::SULLIVAN | Karen - 225-4096 | Wed Jul 01 1987 11:29 | 11 |
| Aren't some men overweight for the same reasons, just as only some women
are overweight for the reasons listed in this book? Why did the book
have to be geared towards women only? Although I do agree that there tends to
be more social pressure for women to be slim, but the pressure is there
for men too.
Personally, the only reason I'm overweight is because I discovered how
wonderful food tasted at about the same time as I started working full time
(less active now).
...Karne
|
363.3 | | FAUXPA::ENO | Section III, Journey & Flight, Chapter 6 | Wed Jul 01 1987 13:26 | 12 |
| I've always felt (and this from a slim person :^) ) that there is
a feminist issue regarding fat. Women's bodies are *supposed* to
add extra weight, especially in the lower quadrants, as they mature.
We are *supposed* to have wide hips. This is a physiological fact
of nature. So a lot of women walk around thinking they are overweight
when they are not (I'm not talking about real obesity here, but
just those few extra pounds or one higher dress size).
It bothers me when I get bothered because I don't have the slim
hips I did when I was eighteen.
G
|
363.4 | Now, about that candy bar... | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Wed Jul 01 1987 13:46 | 10 |
| I'm not fat, I'm not unusually tall, but I'm a size 12. That
this should be where the "big" sizes start is outrageous.
Karen, there are other books on fat, books that don't take a
feminist viewpoint. Given that, why shouldn't there be *one*
with this viewpoint? (I know you were asking in an attempt to
be fair; this is just a way to change the perspective to see if
the meaning of "fair" changes with it.)
Ann B.
|
363.5 | More Thoughts | CHESIR::WOLOCH | Another feisty one | Wed Jul 01 1987 14:28 | 17 |
| I would have to agree that being FAT is not gender-specific and
many of the theories in the book apply to both men and women.
Parts of the text look at the specific problems that are unique
to women. As an example, there is a discussion of how the
onset of menstruation can cause body-image problems and how distorted
images of a woman's body can affect her sexual feelings.
I agree that men have problems with weight, but most men have
larger or bigger frames than women so if a 6' tall man is 10 pounds
overweight, he isn't quite as noticable as the 5' tall woman that
is 10 pounds overweight.
And I firmly believe that society thinks its ok for a man to sport
a few extra pounds while the pressure is still put on women to be
unrealistically thin.
nmw
|
363.6 | I liked the book - | LEZAH::BOBBITT | Festina Lente - Hasten Slowly | Wed Jul 01 1987 16:55 | 33 |
| amazing and extremely insightful book - although I have heard some
complain it's encouraging women to be fat and stay fat. Some women
are going to stay fat anyway, because they can't unravel the internal
reasons why they got that way - hence any diet won't work.
other good books:
Big Beautiful Women - how to be the best you can be at any weight
by ?
Feeding the Hungry Heart - by Geneen Roth - excerpts from seminars
on breaking free from compulsive eating (mostly breaking free from
the emotional reasons which put you there)
Breaking Free From Compulsive Eating - by Geneen Roth - examinse
the seminar mentioned above in depth.
also I have read many books on women in our society - with emphasis
on how women are perceived by both women and men, and what their
value is in many arenas of everyday life. Particularly of interest
is how women have deformed themselves/mutilated themselves for beauty
over the centuries: foot binding in japan (china?), whalebone corsets
of up to 80 psi and removal of ribs to have that hourglass figure,
and now some very dangerous diets and diseases (anorexia, bulimarexia)
and surgical procedures (intestinal balloons, stomach stapling,
suction lipectomy, hormone shots, amphetamines addiction, etc).
No, I am not as pretty outside as Christie Brinkley. Maybe I'm not even
as pretty as David Brinkley. But I am a valid human being, and
having been 200 lbs at one point I am irate at the way society treats
those who are overweight.
-Jody
|
363.7 | women don't mutilate themselves | COLORS::IANNUZZO | Catherine T. | Wed Jul 01 1987 18:24 | 41 |
| > Particularly of interest
> is how women have deformed themselves/mutilated themselves for beauty
> over the centuries: foot binding in japan (china?), whalebone corsets
> of up to 80 psi and removal of ribs to have that hourglass figure,
> and now some very dangerous diets and diseases (anorexia, bulimarexia)
> and surgical procedures (intestinal balloons, stomach stapling,
> suction lipectomy, hormone shots, amphetamines addiction, etc).
I think it is very important to correct the notion tht women have
mutilated THEMSELVES. Women are mutilated in patriarchal societies in
order to devalue them and make them constantly aware that they are
nothing but bodies for the use of men. All of these practices are
designed to bring women up to some standard of "beauty". These
standards are NOT defined by women. They convey to women a sense that
their bodies are intrinsically defective because none ever meet the
appropriate standard, and a woman needs to be grateful for having her
"faults" corrected so that a man will find her desirable property. All
these types of mutilations also have the side effect of destroying
women's health and mobility, putting a woman in need of a "protective"
man. Clitoridectomy, the most horrifying mutilation, is still common in
Africa and parts of the Middle East, and is intended to totally destroy
a woman's sexuality, so that the woman is clearly nothing but a baby
incubator. These women are taught to view their own sexual organs as
"unclean" and in need of removal.
Other women are generally used as "token torturers": e.g., it is usually
an older woman who is put in charge of actually performing the
mutilation on younger women. This does not represent women actually
doing these things to themselves; the torturers have been tokenized into
the system and are used to hide the real source of the maiming. It teaches
women to distrust and fear one another as well, which is all to the
benefit of the patriarchy. Think of the job that must have been done on
the average Chinese mother's head to think that she could allow her own
girl babies to be drowned or exposed at birth, as so very many of them
were up until the present century.
This topic makes me very emotional, and I don't mean to digress too much
from the original topic. The issues are related, if women would only
think about what they put themselves through and what kind of self-
hatred is involved in attempting to meet this century's latest impossible
standard.
|
363.8 | along those lines | LEZAH::BOBBITT | Festina Lente - Hasten Slowly | Wed Jul 01 1987 18:48 | 9 |
| re:-.1
and isn't it interesting how little time/energy these women had
left after exerting themselves so long and laboriously to "look
appropriate" - no wonder they had no time to pay attention to what
was really being done to their gender, and what they could have
undertaken to change things....
-Jody
|
363.9 | <climbing on soapbox> | VINO::EVANS | | Wed Jul 01 1987 19:28 | 34 |
| To return to the subject....I've been fat my whole life. I've lost
and re-gained more than most people will ever weigh. I've heard
celebrities (can't remember her name - the neighbor on "Rhoda")
say that overweight epople should be locked up til they lose weight.
I've heard others say that fat people can't possibly be happy "in
that condition" (something lower than pond-slime, presumably).
I can truthfully say that I have never felt uncomfortable about
my weight *DUE TO ANYTHING OTHER THAN SOCIETY'S TREATMENT OF FAT
PEOPLE*. One gets called names. One can't get attractive clothes
off-the-rack (this is changing). One is told they are not healthy.
One's co-workers feel free to make fat jokes. AND expect one to
laugh.
Ihave finally come to 2 conclusions. 1)Women are not supposed to
take up room, physically or psychically. Fat women take up more
than their share of room (not food, by the way - we generally eat
LESS than anyone else)
2) Diets don't work. The necessary change is mental/emotional. I
believe that one creates protection around ones-self, and will maintain
it as long as needed.
Oh yeah....fat MEN don't have the same problems. "The Refrigerator"
Perry is (yes, folks, it's true) *FAT*. Nad what he gets is admiration
for being a "great athlete". Trust me. The reactions to a man his
size jogging are VASTLY different than to a woman of comperable
size jogging. So, you shouldn't be fat, girls, (:-{) but bygod don't
blot the landscape by trying to get fit.
<thud> well, maybe <THUD!!> (sound of large lady jumping off soapbox)
Dawn
|
363.10 | Hmm | GCANYN::TATISTCHEFF | | Thu Jul 02 1987 00:45 | 36 |
| Well Dawn, I agree with a lot of what you have to say, like fat
is fat, bones is bones, you don't have to be unhealthy emotionally
to be fat or skinny, but it seems to me a lot of heavy women make
themselves that way out of insecurity or unhappiness.
Last time I got dumped I couldn't eat. Go into a grocery store
and my stomach would turn. Starved myself of food, got so bad I
passed out in the shower before realizing I hadn't eaten anything
in 48 hours. When I am upset and feeling like pond scum, I reject
food and its pleasures -- don't deserve pleasure... right?
A few years ago I had a roomate who got dumped and got fat (morbidly
obese). I'd come home to her crying about a new set of stretch
marks on her arms. She was mutilating herself -- she got no pleasure
out of the food, and every bite that went into her mind was a reminder
of the fact that the creep [my name for him, not hers] dumped her
because she "was a weakling", so weak, in fact, that she couldn't
get up the self-discipline to diet. While that way of thinking
about oneself is poo-poo, her obesity was unhealthy because it was
an expression of how much she hated herself because of a man.
My mom's lover complains when she goes under 175 lbs. These days, she
rejoices in her sexuality and her size (200lbs). When she was with my
dad, she was ashamed of that size, even though she was quite slender.
Is she any better off now? She certainly _is_ happier, but in my eyes
she's just letting another man call the shots on what her body "should"
look like.
Your body's your body, and if you can look in the mirror w/o seeing
the evidence of a man shaping your body and your health, you're all
set. But when I was really skinny, all I could see was _his_ skull
peering back at me, and when my roomate was unhappy, all she could
see was the evidence of why she didn't deserve any man. A woman's
weight often _is_ an expression of how she devalues herself.
Lee
|
363.11 | | SPIDER::PARE | | Thu Jul 02 1987 10:21 | 17 |
| Bull, a woman's weight is caused by genetic factors and set points
and is an expression of how SOCIETY devalues her.... Dr. James Hudson
at McClean Hospital is doing extensive work with bulimia and anorexia
and he says that a woman's weight naturally alters throughout her
life but society refuses to accept each person at whatever their
normal weight is so.... all kinds of emotional problems develop
into neurotic behaviors which are quite common in this country.
The behavior you describe is a neurotic emotional reaction to society's
unreal standards. Dr. Hudson works with a drug called Fluoxitine
that makes you lose weight without even trying but ONLY TO YOUR
BODIES NORMAL SETPOINT. I too have been a "yo-yo" all my life with
widely fluctuating weight swings and I too was shocked at how
differently I was treated when I was up as opposed to when I was
down, I was (after all) the same person. So now (at the independent
old age of 42) decided that I will weight whatever I happen to weight
and punch out anyone who insults me_:-)
(more power behind the punch anyway_;-)
|
363.12 | Mon royaume pour un kilo !!! | SHIRE::MILLIOT | Mimi, Zoziau, Vanille-Fraise & Co | Fri Jul 03 1987 07:13 | 27 |
| FAT IS A FEMINIST ISSUE, je veux bien. Mais la maigreur ?
A quoi est du le fait de ne jamais pouvoir prendre un kilo, malgre
les patisseries, les glaces, les bonbons, les repas en sauces a
la creme et les chocolats engloutis ?
Je mange, je mange, j'ai toujours faim, mais je ne grossis pas.
S'agit-il d'un appetit de la bouche (psychologique) ou d'un appetit
de l'estomac (physiologique) ?
Lorsque j'etais enfant, j'etais assez maladive, assez fragile. Mais
a present, je suis plutot solide, je n'arrive meme plus a attraper
la grippe pour ne pas aller a l'ecole :-).
Vous me direz : C'est bien pratique, ne te plains pas !
D'accord, mais pourquoi les autres grossissent-ils/elles au moindre
chocolat et moi pas ?
Je ne fais absolument pas de sport... je ne merite pas d'etre si
mince :-)
Zoziau
|
363.13 | Quick Translation | GCANYN::TATISTCHEFF | | Fri Jul 03 1987 17:18 | 24 |
| -< My Kingdom for one kilo !!! >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FAT IS A FEMINIST ISSUE, I'll grant you. But thinness ?
To what can I attribute the fact that I can never gain a kilo, despite
pastries, ice cream, candies, meals with cream sauces and covered
chocolates?
I eat, I eat, I'm always hungry but I don't gain weight.
Is it about an appetite of the mouth (psychological) or of the stomach
(physiological)?
When I was a child, I was fairly sickly, fragile. But now, I am
more solid, I can't even catch a little cold so I won't have to
go to school :-).
You'll tell me: that's pretty practical [convenient], don't complain!
Yes, but why do the others gain weight at the smallest bit of chocolate
and not me?
I don't do sports... I don't deserve to be so skinny :-)
Zoziau
|
363.14 | | GCANYN::TATISTCHEFF | | Fri Jul 03 1987 17:23 | 9 |
| Everybody's body is different Z. From what I see of your notes,
I'd lay odds that you burn 600 calories just sitting down: tightly
strung [er, pas nerveuse, mais quand meme...] people tend to burn
calories faster. If you smoke, your body is bad at metabolizing
food, so more passes through your system without getting used.
Think of yourself as an energy waster :)
Lee
|
363.15 | once more into the breach | OPHION::HAYNES | Charles Haynes | Fri Jul 03 1987 17:39 | 28 |
| Fat *is* a feminist issue. I decided this after performing the
following gedanken experiment. I tried to imaging successful men, then
successful fat men. No problem. Then successful women, and successful
fat women. Drew a blank. Women must be thin to succeed in our society,
men do not. (This is an overgeneralization I know, but let it ride.)
How often are "slightly overweight" or "plump" men criticised for their
appearance? How about women?
As I've stated elsewhere in this conference, I find "plump" women MUCH
MORE attractive than "skinny" women. American society's current ideal
of feminine beauty is the barely pubescent girl. (I use the word
deliberately.) Thin, no hips, small breasts, large eyes. Besides
being sexist, it's ageist as well. Can you imagine a lover 10 years
older than yourself? How about 10 years younger?
Strong women are exciting, plump women are sensual, older women are
experienced, I want a partner, not a daughter! I want to learn as
well as teach!
Why do I feel like I'm in the minority?
-- Charles
P.S. Before anyone flames me for assuming that all thin, small hipped,
small breasted women are unexciting, not sensual, and inexperienced...
please, I DO know that. I am trying to make a point. Please don't
take my remarks personally, I'm not trying to hurt or offend, just
to get people to think about some of our societies attitudes.
|
363.16 | Size and success aren't related | HUMAN::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Sat Jul 04 1987 17:13 | 51 |
| Gee, my new manager -- a senior manager -- is a woman who is as
they say "not thin", and yet strikes me on first impressions to
be capable, strong and and atractive. I suspect she reads this
file, so I shall neither identify her nor say more than that to
categorize her. It doesn't seem to me that it is any more
important for a woman to be thin than a man in order to match my
conception of a manager.
It doesn't seem to me that actual weight is the issue so much as
health and state of mind. A friend of mine who was an engineer
at DEC for many years has generally weighed--like Nero Wolfe--
about a seventh of a ton. He is definitely on the heavy side,
yet because of the power of his personality he doesn't strike me
as "fat" in a derogatory sense. (These days he's a good deal
lighter, too). He has style, poise and energy. I would rate him
as both good looking and healthy looking, even when he was
at the seventh of a ton figure.
My manager, who is a good deal smaller than my friend, but on
the heavy side, has a similar degree of poise, energy and style.
Neither of them is a fat person who has succeeded, but rather a
capable and successful person--manager or engineer--who happens
to be heavy rather than light. Their weight isn't really an
important facet of either one, nor does it seem to be a very
negative facet.
It's true that neither of these people would be cast for the
role of engineer or manager in a Hollywood production, but does
the media stereotype have to drive our own images? It seems to
me that in real life I meet lots of people that don't fit the
Hollywood- or Madison Ave-perfect images of their profession or
of the perfect person who are none-the-less quite successful. It
also seems to me that many, or even most people that I know
recognize and accept successful people who don't fit the mold.
I think if we can't imagine successful women, successful fat
women, successful blacks or whatever it is because we have not
been paying attention. Around DEC at least I have met young,
old, short, tall, fat, skinny, able, handicapped, black, white,
handsome, beautiful and homely managers, engineers and the like.
We need to focus on them and not on the media images if we are
to avoid being dragged around by our misconceptions.
JimB.
PS: It is my general rule to never say anything negative about
anyone in a notefile. It is certainly unwise to do so about
one's own boss. Given this, I wouldn't have mentioned my manager
and her appearence if I thought there was anything at all
negative about her size or appearence, which is the whole point
of this note.
|
363.17 | I think we're in violent agreement | OPHION::HAYNES | Charles Haynes | Sun Jul 05 1987 16:39 | 31 |
| Sorry Jim, I guess I wasn't clear. Citing examples of successful fat
people doesn't really decide anything. The premise (as I understand it)
is that being overweight is more of a handicap to success for a woman
than it is for a man.
I have even more respect for successful "heavy" women than other
successful women, because I believe that they have had to work even
harder to acheive their success. This usually shows in other facets
of their personalities as well.
You are describing things as you treat them, and as they should be. I,
sympathize and agree with everything you say, however, I DON'T think
that what we want is the way things are. I think you'd agree with me
that large women are at a disadvantage in this society. I hope you'd
agree with me that large men are looked down on less. Until large women
are no longer stigmatized MORE than large men, there is a problem. A
*feminist* problem.
-- Charles
P.S. Problem for language theorists out there: What is a
non-judgemental way to talk about large or heavy people?
Plump sounds too cutesy, as is chubby.
Overweight is too clinical, and has connotations of unhealthy.
Large doesn't really address weight.
Heavy sounds like a euphemism.
Fat is exactly the wrong word, it has a large freight of negativism.
What's the opposite of "thin"? Thin doesn't have nearly the negative
connotations that "fat" does. (Which just goes to show...)
|
363.18 | Moderately violent agreement | HUMAN::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Sun Jul 05 1987 17:50 | 15 |
| I agree that we agree with how the world ought to be. What I was
trying to say was that if we can't imagine some group--women,
blacks, overweight, or handicapped people as successful it is a
failure of our imagination. If we let Hollywood or Madison Ave.
set the limitations of how we think of people we are
contributing to the problem.
I was focusing on your gedanken experiment. My conclussion from
your experiment was that we need to improve our imaginations,
that we need to make sure that we don't constrain ourselves and
others by accepting restricted definitions and images of
successful people. I see this as a problem that we all share in
and not a problem of others.
JimB.
|
363.19 | Isn't healthy enough?? | VICKI::BULLOCK | Living the good life | Mon Jul 06 1987 11:46 | 25 |
| For .9--
My Lord, Dawn--if that isn't a correct summation of how we view
fat in America, I don't know what is. Isn't it funny (not really)
how you can feel great about yourself, but others feel free to comment
on how you "should" look?
I weigh more today that I ever have in my life; also I am more
fit and more active than I have ever been in my life. I feel very
healthy, but I am ashamed to say that often I let myself listen
to others about what I "should" weigh. That's sick, when you think
of it.
Your note about jogging really touched a nerve--I used to jog 3
miles every day, and felt great. One day some teenager in a passing
car yelled out, "You better run, you WHALE!" No matter how in shape
you are, how good you think you look, and no matter that it's just
some ignorant kid, THAT HURTS.
If you are healthy and happy, what else matters? This societal
sickness is something I'd like to see the end of. Can't we put
our energies to better use than pushups and running other women
down?
JAne
|
363.20 | statistics, or something | LEZAH::BOBBITT | Festina Lente - Hasten Slowly | Mon Jul 06 1987 12:09 | 22 |
| I was reading a few "working woman" magazines a few years ago (mom
subscribed). There were a few statistics that stuck in my head.
colleges are 3 times more likely to take a thin person, when compared
with a fat person (read: obese) of equal qualifications/experience.
and the women who are most likely to make it to higher management
positions (about 80% of them follow 4 of the following) are those who:
*have slender, boyish figures*
are 5'8" or taller
dress "sensibly" (power suits etc.)
have masculine sounding names, like Morgan, and Leigh
have short or tightly-put-up hair
I wish I could find the issues, but it's interesting to think that
in order for women to succeed as men do, they must all match the
same stereotype, regardless of gender
-Jody
|
363.21 | | SPMFG1::CHARBONND | | Mon Jul 06 1987 12:19 | 14 |
| re .20 That description fits most everybody who makes
it into higher management. The serious businessperson
*looks* serious. If you look sexy, your motives are
suspect. One writer characterized the attitude as follows :
A salesman shows up in his office in designer clothes,
rather than a plain business suit. He thinks, "Is this
guy here to do business with me, or to make it with my
secretary ?" leaving off for the moment that this
assumes the secretary is female, you can see that any
clothes/appearance not "businesslike" detracts from
your effectiveness among the upper management of any
conservatively run establishment.
(Roughly quoted from Bill Thourlby)
|
363.22 | my $.02 (or less...:-) | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Mon Jul 06 1987 14:36 | 35 |
| I guess "FAT" has connotations of "unhealthy" for me. So, I don't
like it if someone refers to me as "fat", because I've never been
healthier (well, except for the hay fever...but I seldom gets colds
or the flu or other ailments) in my life. "Built like a brick
outhouse" might be a better description: I'm just under six feet
tall, and weigh around 200 lbs. (usually people think I weigh less
than that, but they are forgetting how tall I am). I'd rather be
thought of as "solid" or "sturdy" or "strong" (since I was never
cut out to be "thin", "skinny", or "svelte").
It's a different thing if a person is not healthy, whatever their
weight may be. I think we are conditioned to pay too much attention
to our weights (people have been telling me lately "gee, you look
like you lost weight" as if I was supposed to be pleased with this
observation, and then act surprised when I tell them that I seldom
weigh myself and really don't care what I weigh so long as I am
healthy and have loads of energy). I think we ought to pay attention
to our health, not to our dimensions.
I don't think that looking unhealthy is really much less of a stigma
for a man, either, though most men are physically larger than most
women and so don't look as "fat" as we would because they have larger
frames. I have a male friend who must weigh 300 lbs, maybe 30 or
so of which is "excess baggage", but he is extremely healthy and
surely isn't particularly "fat", although he is "big" -- which he
would still be even if he dropped 30 lbs (he has huge hands and
feet, massive shoulders, a big barrel chest - built like a bear).
Then again, I have a cousin who is anorexic/bulemic, which is a
lot less healthy than carrying the extra 30 lbs. distributed over
Tom's large frame.
Then again, maybe I;'m rationalizing, but I'd rather be healthy
than "thin"!
/Charlotte
|
363.23 | fat and health | VINO::EVANS | | Tue Jul 07 1987 14:46 | 37 |
| RE: - Jane: Whales, and jogging
Having taught phys. ed. and having always been into athletics, I've
always been able to exercise without giving too much credence to
the - ahem - &%*%'s who make obnoxious comments. BUT: it is MUCH
more difficult for women to overlook the comments (atfer all, our
second function in society is to be decorative) and keep on joggin'.
I'm a firm believer in exercise (for everybody), and I think that
the crappola about fat people being less healthy would be really
tested IF fat women were doing as much helpful exercise as a) their
thin counterparts, and B) the fat guys.
However, the fat teenage male jogging is more likelky to be taken
for the football team's Left Tackle (don't mess with HIM), and the
fat teenage female jogging is more likely to be taken as FAIR GAME
for obnoxious commentary. Result: she stays INSIDE, away from exercise,
and becomes less healthy. (Sounds like natural selection. Well,
UN-natural selection..)
When I taught school, kids did the "yearbook-signing-bit" in June.
One 7th grade boy wrote he liked me "even though I could bench-press
more than he could". Think about it. This kid was 11 years old -
skinny, short. OF COURSE I could bench press more than he could.
I could bench-press more than he could if I weighed 125 lbs.!!!!
But, coming from him (young male) to me (mature, fat, female) the
comment was a knock. Imagine him saying that to the MALE gym teacher.
It wouldn't compute. As a female, 25 years older than he, I still
SHOULD NOT have been stronger. Or maybe more to the point: I shouldn't
have had the temerity to LOOK stronger.
Yup, we're talking sexism here, folks.
RE: Setpoints. Every time I've lost weight, I've returned to the
SAME weight. TO THE POUND. Exactly. I believe in setpoints.
Dawn
|
363.24 | Tee shirt saying | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | I haven't lost my mind - it's Backed-up on tape somewhere | Tue Jul 07 1987 16:25 | 4 |
| Seen on a tee-shirt worn by a very large woman:
Godesses are not anorexic.
|
363.25 | I want one of those! | WEBSTR::RANDALL | I'm no lady | Tue Jul 07 1987 16:58 | 3 |
| I love it. Any idea where to get one?
--bonnie, who comes from sturdy peasant stock
|
363.26 | ANOTHER T-SHIRT SAYING | CHESIR::WOLOCH | Another feisty one | Thu Jul 09 1987 10:43 | 10 |
|
Seen on a T-shirt at the health club to which I belong;
(Paraphrased)
I MAY BE FAT
BUT YOU'RE UGLY
I CAN LOSE WEIGHT
WHAT CAN YOU DO
|
363.27 | Just Made My Day | GCANYN::TATISTCHEFF | | Thu Jul 09 1987 10:49 | 3 |
| Thanks-
Lee
|
363.28 | Where do you usually exercise, Vern? | AMUN::CRITZ | Ya know what I mean, Vern | Thu Jul 09 1987 15:25 | 9 |
| I want some of these T-shirts.
I'm 6'6" and weigh about 245+.
As Garfield (the cat) said:
I'm not overweight, I'm just undertall!"
Scott (The Undertall)
|
363.29 | Literary reference | ACORN::MINOW | Je suis Marxist, tendance Groucho | Thu Jul 09 1987 16:16 | 9 |
| .26 is a variant of a comment attributed to Winston Churchill:
Bessie Braddock, M.P.: "Winston, you're drunk!"
Churchill: "Bessie, you're ugly. And tommorow morning I shall be sober."
From Nancy McFee, "The Book of Insults."
Martin.
|
363.30 | Are we doing it to ourselves? | VICKI::BULLOCK | Living the good life | Fri Jul 10 1987 12:18 | 21 |
| Oh, these last few comments have made my whole week!!
We need to rethink, ladies and gentlemen--seems like most of us
like ourselves and each other just fine as is. How many times have
you been introduced to a thin person, and think to yourself, 'I
hate him/her!'. Sick-o...
It's interesting to me that the majority of men I have known have
all agreed on one thing--they hate "skinny"! And come to think
of it, the men I have always been attracted to are heavier than
your standard male model :-)...
Who thinks up all these impossible standards we make ourselves
miserable with?? I just heard on the news this morning that Mass.
has the biggest "diet drug" problem in the country; as in,
QUIIIIIIIIICK--make me THIN!
Kinda makes me want a box of Oreos..
Jane
|
363.31 | :-) | ARMORY::CHARBONND | Noto, Ergo Sum | Fri Jul 10 1987 12:39 | 8 |
| RE .30 Hi Jane - you bring the cookies, I'll bring the milk.
Losing the battle of the bulge. Does everyone have a metabolic
shift in their twenties ? Up 'til I was 25 I couldn't gain
weight. 145 no matter what I ate. Then, boom. Now 210 and
holding on for dear life.
Dana
|
363.32 | obesity is a mental set | YODA::BARANSKI | What, I owe you money?!? | Fri Jul 10 1987 12:58 | 30 |
| RE: .*
True, a woman should be able to be any weight that she wishes to be, and
be happy about it.
Yet, should I not be able to have a slim woman as a companion in life if
I wish, without being harrassed?
Ric's mother is obese. I detest that. Yet, I can see that it was because she
was unhappy. Yet she could never admit that she was unhappy, because it would
mean losing me; all that she could do was be unhappy, and so, make me unhappy. I
tried to make her happy, but I could not. I tried to help her lose weight, as I
really believe she wanted to, but I could not. Yet, she slowly gained weight,
and did not lose any weight after being pregnant. My mother is also obese.
If you are happy being plump, fine. If you are happy being slim, fine. But if
you're not happy, *change* *yourself*.
Maybe what I hate about obesity is not the physical attribute, but the
psychological attributes... I don't know, I've never had the chance to uncouple
them.
FWIW, I do like tall/strong/large women as well, and I relate well to obese
people as well, and I myself am tall with a few extra pounds. I just would not
want them next to my skin...
What's a male to do? Men's preceptions of women are shaped by women. We're
all in this mess together; have to stop chewing on each other...
Jim.
|
363.33 | ->And the winner is....<- | SSVAX::LAVOIE | | Fri Jul 17 1987 10:42 | 70 |
|
Who tells us to be thin????????????????????????????????
Pick up any magazine and tell me what the models look like! Thin
gorgeous people who have the really great looking guys. It is drilled
into our head since birth that fat is ugly/disgusting etc....it
is in to be thin according to every major fashion world. If you
are over a size nine good luck trying to find clothes! Even at the
other end it is a little tricky to find fives.
If you look around at advertising which is best known for it's little
subliminal messages you will see them blaring
THIN IS IN!!
They are practically telling all people who are an ounce overweight
that they will be miserable, lonely, unloved, failures for the rest
of their lives.
There is an ad for Tab soda....a girl in a bikini walking up the
beach. Sixty minutes did a poll of people watching this commercial
a little of three quarters didn't even know the product!!!
Look at Calvin Klein ads.....(when Brooke used to do them) she used
to cram her bod into those because thin skin tight jeans are sexy.
What about the ones for Obsession perfume?? The girl is a god damn
stick!!!! BUT she has a nice looking guy in her bed...
The best one I can think of for guys is the one for the weightlifting
equipment where they show the upper torso and the guy has started
to take off his shirt and you can't see his face but only his chest
and arms. What does that say?? If you don't work out and have an
awesome bod (which he did :-) ) forget it you might as well just
go crawl somewhere and die.
Why do we do it?? Some do it for men/women, some because they are obsessed
with the fear of being fat, some do it for health. But the big
underlying reason that I see is that the thin people have always
been portrayed as being popular, rich, lucky in love, fun, no problems,
and all those wonderful things.
Fat people are made to feel uncomfortable because of their stature.
Have you seen those stupid booths at fast food restaurants??? How
can they fit? They don't or they suck in what they can. granted
fat is not healthy because of the damage you can do to your heart
but the social outcasting of these people are NOT going to help
their problems. Some people can diet and loose weight others have
to really honestly work at it until their dying day.
Just because you go out with a thin person (363.32) is no reason
to feel guilty. Some people let the rest of themselves go (cleanliness
etc) when they get larger because they feel lazier. You can find
the sweetest people who are overweight but very few people will
ever know because they have that social stigma of being "fat". Such
a shame....
I know I fought this battle I ate when I was lonely, bored.....it
became a recreational habit. But I managed to control it before
it controlled me. Now I am thin and more healthy. (not necessarily
the stereotype)
Why can't we just accept the fact that we are all going to be different
one way or another.....
Debbi
|
363.34 | | ARMORY::CHARBONND | Noto, Ergo Sum | Fri Jul 17 1987 13:20 | 12 |
| RE .33 >THIN GORGEOUS PEOPLE WHO HAVE THE REALLY GREAT LOOKING GUYS.
And if you weren't so worried about attracting them, your eyes might
be open to the average guys. Then you could be out with them, instead
of sitting at home eating ice cream and chips.
flame off
If you ain't a 10, forget 10's. Be honest with yourself. Do you
really have to be with some conceited person who is most interested
in the mirror ? *Most* thin people I know are too busy worrying
about their figure to develop their minds. Shallow.
|
363.35 | thin is in... | JACUZI::DAUGHAN | fight individualism | Fri Jul 17 1987 23:44 | 5 |
| i dont think fat is a gender issue at all.
having being the victim of an eating disorder myself,and being treated
for it recently,men fall prey to it also.
kelly
|
363.36 | Fat IS very much a gender issue | VINO::EVANS | | Mon Jul 20 1987 14:56 | 20 |
| re: .35
Eating disorders is a different subject. Yes, men fall prey to them
as well (tho' not as much to anorexia, I believe).
Because one is fat deos not mean they have an eating disorder -
there are studies which show that fat women, especially, do NOT
eat more than their thin counterparts.
Also, regarding being fat vs. heart problems, etc. The studies have
been done with young (white, probably - don't know) MALES. There
are MD's who believe that studies done with females will show very
different results. Remember, women are made to STORE fat quickly
and easily - it is natural for us, where it is not, for men.
All other things being equal - women take more flak, and have more
problems created for us, for being fat than do males in this society.
DAwn
|
363.37 | worry yourself thin | STRATA::DAUGHAN | fight individualism | Mon Jul 20 1987 15:41 | 12 |
| re.36
i was not referring to being heavy,i was referring to being thin.
i saw some men who where just as obsesed with being thin as i was/am
it was not a pretty picture.
they had the same feelings that i did"if i was thinner,people would
accept me".
media has a lot to do with it
i can believe that mass. has the biggest problem with diet pills
kelly
|
363.38 | Geez! I didn't know that! | VINO::EVANS | | Mon Jul 20 1987 17:11 | 16 |
| RE: .37
Wow! I had no idea men had such obesessions about thinness! I would've
expected excessive weight-training and steroid use before I thought
about eating disorders.
Thanks for raising my consciousness.
(Now what the (*^% do we DO about a society that tells us we need
to adhere to some standard to get other people's acceptance, and
never tells us the big secret that our own acceptance is what counts?)
Humph.
Dawn
|
363.39 | Grassroots change, my dears | GCANYN::TATISTCHEFF | | Mon Jul 20 1987 23:36 | 10 |
| We tell the people we love and like that they and their bodies are
as fantastic as they are, and they should be more concerned about
their _selves_ than their bodies.
After all, we the enlightened <big smiley face> became friends with
them because of who they are, and wouldn't want them to change that.
If only...
Lee
|
363.40 | Grass roots starts at home. | HUMAN::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Tue Jul 21 1987 01:00 | 15 |
| Not only should we tell those we love that we love them just the
way they are, but we need to tell ourselves the same things.
I've gained about 50 lbs. since I started working (128lbs to
about 175-180lbs), and while people all around me are weigh
watching I am willing to say that the extra is mine. I worked
hard for it, and I earned it. I wouldn't mind improving my
muscle tone and dropping a few pounds, but I refuse to flagelate
myself over it.
It's easier for me as a man, but women need to be able to be
honest with themselves and supportive of themselves as well as
of each other. We can all work at refusing to let Mad Ave and
Hollywood dictate the images of beauty and acceptability.
JimB.
|
363.41 | mixed messages | VINO::EVANS | | Tue Jul 21 1987 14:52 | 19 |
| Of course, then we have the "mixed message syndrome" -
I have an aunt who used to:
1. Say "Oh well, there's just more to love!"
2. Offer me $5/lb to lose weight
3. Tell her gentleman friend not to bring a camera on an outing
because I was wearing shorts.
4. Buy me candy, ice cream, etc. and offer me MORE
In various combinations, within minutes of each other!!!
Go figure.
Dawn
|
363.42 | a think person trying to get out! | JUNIOR::TASSONE | July 30th - 1 year Anniv | Tue Jul 21 1987 15:09 | 17 |
| This woman I saw on Sunday has got to be the most obese "person"
I have ever seen. It didn't matter that she was a woman. What
mattered was the ill health she was in: obese and smoking. I often
wonder if people "remain" obese and unhealthly because of some deep
seeded feelings of hatred for themselves. How can anyone who took
the time to paint nails, toes, and put on eye make-up not look at
the rest of the person?
My boyfriend said, "as long as there is someone that is bigger than
her, she probably doesn't think she looks "that" bad.
I was eating and felt ill when she sat down in front of me. I know,
you're probably all thinking, "who the %^&$ do you think you are?"
Well, it "is" my problem that this woman's obesity bothered me.
But obviously, it doesn't bother her.
So be it.
|
363.43 | why blame the media? | BANDIT::MARSHALL | hunting the snark | Tue Jul 21 1987 17:11 | 29 |
| re .37:
> media has a lot to do with it
Is this really true? Listening to people with eating disorders talk
about why they "do it", they inevitably bring up the images of people
in advertising. "If I looked like them I would be loved/perfect..."
Usually they then go on and blame advertising for presenting images
of such skinny women. Seems to me though, that the media is not
"the cause". The images in the media are just what these people
latch on to as "the solution" to their problem. The CAUSE of the
problem, I think, must be something much more personal than images,
i.e. the family.
The key to that phrase is not the image that they point to, but
the need to point to it in the first place.
I do not understand the 'logic' that goes from seeing an ad
that uses attractive people, to the implication that if you don't
look like those people, then you are nothing. In order to make such
a leap, there has to be something _already_ wrong previous to seeing
the ad.
/
( ___
) ///
/
|
363.44 | thin is in | STRATA::DAUGHAN | fight individualism | Tue Jul 21 1987 18:13 | 7 |
| re.43
i agree with you 100%
first you must start off with a strong dislike of self,the media
just helps point out possible "cures" to it.
if i was better looking etc...
kelly
|
363.45 | *BIG SIGH* | VINO::EVANS | | Tue Jul 21 1987 18:34 | 23 |
| I have never flamed in this (or any) notes file. I shall now proceed
to shout.
RE:.42
PLEASE STOP CONNECTING THE WORDS "FAT" AND "UNHEALTHY". (ok, "obese")
THAT IS *NOT* REPEAT *NOT* A GIVEN.
Ahem.
Having said that, I believe it is unwise for ANYONE to smoke. I
believe it is "unwis-er" for a fat person who does not get regular
exercise to smoke. (But then, most people who exercised regularly,
probably wouldn't WANT to smoke)
I suspect that a negative attitude about fat people may affect one's
feelings regarding the state of their health; however, I would be
willing to bet that if studies were done on fat people who exercized
regularly and ate a good diet, they (we) would be no less healthy
than the population in general.
Dawn
|
363.46 | Gee what a waste! | OURVAX::JEFFRIES | the best is better | Wed Jul 22 1987 10:37 | 17 |
| I am by American standards over weight, I wear a size 22. My sister
wears a size 6, but I wouldn't trade places with he for a million
dollars. She has High blood preassure, gall bladder problems, heart
problems, is on three different restrictive diets, gets tired just
walking around the outside of her house. I just had my check up
and the only concern my doctor had was my weight. I mow all my own
grass, about 1/2 acre and it's not flat, I stack 8 cords of wood
every year, we (my daughter and I) have a farm, 5 horses, 4 sheep,
2 cows, several dogs, cats, rabbits etc. They have to be fed and
watered twice a day. I work a part time job, and am a member of
the ZBA in my town. I am an active member of Women in Business a
professional womens club in my area and a candidate for vice president.
For fun I garden , do gourmet cooking, and try to read a book a
week.
I guess if I weren't over weight I could do something constructive
with all my spare time and energy :-).
|
363.47 | Yeah Pat | BUFFER::LEEDBERG | Truth is Beauty, Beauty is Truth | Wed Jul 22 1987 10:41 | 6 |
| that was great.....
_peggy (-)
| The Goddess is overflowing in your life...
|
363.48 | HA! | VINO::EVANS | | Wed Jul 22 1987 13:13 | 4 |
| I second that "Yeah Pat", and I rest my case.
Dawn
|
363.49 | another hypothesis | SUPER::HENDRICKS | Not another learning experience! | Wed Jul 22 1987 14:18 | 34 |
| There are an awful lot of current hypotheses about why people get
fat/stay fat/get fat again after losing weight. One of the current
popular ones seems to be that self hatred is the real issue--and
that's obviously true for some people.
I think there's a simpler explanation that is often overlooked
for many people whose weight problem (or eating problem) began in
childhood. I think it's true for a number of women, and perhaps some men.
When people are children, comfort, safety, and security are very
important factors. Some children get these from their families,
others from their peers or pets, and others from other sources.
Some children turn to food to meet those needs, especially in a
culture/family where food is plentiful. Sometimes food is a seemingly
*better* comfort than the nearby humans, especially if it's there
when the child wants it (availability), can be consumed until the child
is full (satiety), and will be there again when the child wants
it (consistency).
The child has a certain kind of control over a comfort that she
may not have over any other comforts in her life. She may not have
any control over her ability to limit access to it, but she has
control over access to it!
This kind of behavior becomes deeply ingrained. It's hard for the
teenager and adult to switch over to less destructive types of
fulfillment. So for adult women who can relate to this kind of
eating, giving up food can often mean giving up the only fulfillment
she has ever been able to have at will (at least in this culture).
Even when other types of fulfillment are available, it's very, very
hard to give up ingrained behavior that provided something very important.
Holly
|
363.50 | ...so that's the reason | SQM::BURKHOLDER | | Thu Jul 23 1987 07:45 | 6 |
| re .49
that's why the one pound bag of M&M's was sooo important. Everything
else in my life may have been going down the tubes but those M&M's
*always* tasted great. Guaranteed satisfaction.
|
363.51 | | SSVAX::LAVOIE | | Thu Jul 23 1987 14:53 | 24 |
|
I hate to inform you but I *don't sit home eat chips and ice cream
on Friday and Saturday nights. I am very thin (96 lbs).
I am also not worried about getting nice looking guys either. I
have dated many people and enjoy staying single right now, BY CHOICE.
What I was saying in a round about way is that the media (again)
have a great deal of influence as to what the norm is as far as
weights and things. I think people would feel alot more comfortable
if they opened up a magazine every now and again and there was a
larger sized woman as a model. The psychology of it all tells us
that all these people in the ads have smiles, look happy (they *must
be* happy) and all those wonderful things.
How many ads have you seen for overweight people?? Finally the public
is beginning to realize that there is more than one norm for life,
that we all are individuals.
Men go through the same sh*t......(well almost)
Debbi
|
363.52 | another healthy one | WEBSTR::RANDALL | I'm no lady | Thu Jul 23 1987 22:09 | 12 |
| I had to see the doctor today (ear infection; God, I hate antibiotics!)
for only the second time in five years, assuming you don't count
prenatal care. I weighed in at 162 (20 pounds for each baby), so while
I was there I asked the doctor if he thought I should lose weight.
He looked at my chart and at me, at my blood pressure reading of
110/60, and told me no, he didn't see any health reason to lose
weight, just make sure I keep exercising.
So there.
--bonnie
|
363.53 | 'right' weight is not always what Dr says | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | I haven't lost my mind - it's Backed-up on tape somewhere | Thu Jul 23 1987 22:27 | 10 |
| Only a couple of times during my adult life (over the age of 14)
have I been more than 5 lbs off of 145 lbs - and either way I feel
bad, and try to get back to 145. This trying happens in a physical
way - if too fat, I feel heavy and like I'm eating too much, then
cut back. If too thin, feel like there is nothing to me, and want
to eat. I can't remember a more miserable time than when I was
135 and couldn't afford more food.
Elizabeth
|