T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
354.2 | | MANANA::RAVAN | | Fri Jun 26 1987 11:55 | 28 |
| I thought this had been discussed in PARENTING (new or old), but
I can't find it. I believe there were some references there that
might be useful.
I'm 35, and am running into a similar problem. It isn't that I
desperately want a baby - that would make a decision somewhat simpler;
instead, I find myself wondering what I'll feel like in another
ten years if I don't start a family now. Oh, there's always the
possibility of adoption, but to be honest I'm rather proud of my
family and would like our "bloodlines" should be preserved.
From what I've read, while there are increased risks as a mother
approaches her 40's, the risks aren't as high as once thought. There
have certainly been a lot of celebrities having kids at ages 35
to 45 lately, and (as far as I know) the kids are all right. If
you're healthy and don't have a family history of birth problems
you've probably got a good shot at a successful pregnancy.
I can't help with the patience angle. I have the same doubts, and
am torn between "think of all the things I could teach a child"
and "what if I couldn't handle it".
Sometimes I wish the choice weren't up to us; with choice comes
responsibility, and it's a *big* responsibility.
But only sometimes!
-b
|
354.3 | The childs view! | NEPTUN::FRECHETTE | | Fri Jun 26 1987 13:50 | 29 |
|
You also have to think about the child, when he/she grows up! My
mom was 40 when she had me, and my dad 39. Granted when I was small
I really didn't notice that they were alot older than my friends
parents. When I was about 10, their "age" got to me. I was very
much into skiing, as my parents were "great" skiiers in there prime,
and they didn't have the drive to take long ski vacations with a
"kid". Don't get me wrong, my parents aren't old farts, just their
loosing their reflexs through the natural age process. My father
still skiis very well, at 64. He golfs and bikes too. My mom on
the other hand, gave up downhill skiing when I was 11 so that made
it even harder to go on ski vacations. She bikes now and walks and
is in great shape. It was just hard to do family things. Even homework,
my parents were well educated, for their day, but had no idea what
Trig and Physics were all about. Then there's the old-fashioned
values.... I won't even get into that!
Overall, my parents are wonderful people! They have given me everything
they could, but I sometimes feel like I missed out on alot. Then
I think how lucky I am to have parents who love me.
Another interesting point? My father retired when I was 15. When
it snowed out, he used to have me skip school to go skiing! Sometimes
I think I put alot of youth in their later years.
Well just something I think you should consider.
Mel
|
354.4 | Patience? | FAUXPA::ENO | Section III, Journey & Flight, Chapter 6 | Fri Jun 26 1987 14:01 | 9 |
| Jane, I'm not speaking from experience here (30 and no children
yet), but I believe the "no patience now that I'm older" myth is
a lot of bunk. I can't imagine that someone would
have more patience than someone with a wealth of experience and
maturity. My opinion. I've heard too many twenty-year-olds screaming
at their children.
Gloria
|
354.5 | another childs point | NCVAX1::COOPER | studette in action | Fri Jun 26 1987 17:52 | 14 |
| My mother was 41 when she had me my day was 45, a year and a half
later she had my baby sister.
Although as I was growing up, my mother seemed "older" than my friends
parents, she never displayed any type of old virtues on us, she
was a very up-to-date parent, and I never felt cheated because my
parents were so much *older* than those of my friends.
According to her if she had it to do all over again, she wouldn't
change a thing. And as for me, if I could pick my parents, I would
choose the ones I have (well, my mother anyway).
CC
|
354.6 | One (man's) opinion... | TSG::BRADY | Bob Brady, TSG, LMO4-1/K4, 296-5396 | Fri Jun 26 1987 19:31 | 9 |
| My wife and I waited until 32/33 for our first, who's now 2.
Emotionally/Financially we are glad we did. Physically, there are days
when we think maybe teenage parenthood wouldn't have been such a bad
idea :-) :-)
Bottom line: a unique mixture of wearying and *joyful*.
Dwell excessively on the awesomeness of the responsibility and you'll
scare yourself out of it. Check that you've got the basic emotional &
material wherewithal and then dive in...
|
354.8 | a NEW life after 35 | TSG::STOCKER | | Mon Jun 29 1987 13:30 | 19 |
| I'm 35 now and Alison is approaching 1.5. We absolutely ADORE being
parents. It's the most rewarding, frustrating, wonderful and tiring
thing we've ever done.
I have almost NO time to myself anymore (I'm cutting back my work
week to three days after this project ends...) and my husband and
I have had ONE weekend alone together since she was born. There
are times I feel like all I do is work. Somehow we have three times
as much dirty laundry to wash as we did before, and I just noticed
the crayon marks on the coffee table...
BUT, she's starting to talk real words now, and you need a towel
after she kisses you, and every minute I see a change and growth
and it's fantastic to watch. Yes, it's VERY tiring and wearing
to be a parent, but somehow you find the patience. My husband and
I are closer because of this shared experience. The rewards far
outweigh the trouble.
Susan
|
354.9 | Maturity makes for better parenting! | HPSCAD::TWEXLER | | Mon Jun 29 1987 14:11 | 12 |
| My parents were 35 when they had their first kid, and 41 when they
had me. Their experience made them wonderful and understanding
and able to relate to me while also able to give me the benefit
of their experience. My personal feeling is that 25 is too young to
have kids (no offense intended to anyone). With kids, the system is
going to have to be bucked now and then (example, teacher tells
parent that little girls just have to learn to deal with rock throwing
boys who just want some attention), and a mature (35+) parent is
going to be less likely to take that crap seriously--and further,
a mature parent is more likely to know what to do.
Tamar
|
354.10 | Thanks, all | VICKI::BULLOCK | Living the good life | Mon Jun 29 1987 17:16 | 11 |
| Thanks, everyone--
I appreciate the responses to this note. (Believe me, it wasn't
easy to ask advice on this one!) I'm very encouraged by some of
the replies. Where I don't plan to have a child tomorrow :-), I
do think a lot about it, and I thank you all for sharing your thoughts
and experiences with me.
I'll let you know whenever I decide to take the plunge!
Jane
|
354.11 | age and patience | CREDIT::RANDALL | I'm no lady | Wed Jul 01 1987 16:59 | 42 |
| This is a little late, but since I had my first when I was 19 and
my second when I was 30, I feel like I've done it both ways so maybe
I can compare just a little bit.
First of all, age doesn't have anything to do with what kind of parent
you'll make. Some very young women are very good mothers -- the
21-year-old mother of three preschoolers down the street who just
barely graduated from high school comes to mind. She dances in the
sprinkler with her kids, teaches them how to make paper airplanes,
takes them to the fire department and to museums, and knows what seems
like a million cheap educational games. Some older and experienced
mothers are too wrapped up in their careers or their own interests to
make room for the child. This is a matter of your personality. Your
age doesn't automatically increase or decrease your qualifications.
Second, you can't tell a whole lot about how you'll deal with your own
children by how you deal with other people's children, especially with
regard to how much patience you have.
I don't like kids in the generic, or in groups, and I don't have much
tolerance for a number of the less savory sides of child-rearing, like
foul smells and lots of noise. But my own children, these two separate
precious lives that I carried inside me, that I've known since their
first breath, that I've held and comforted through bruises and tears
and laughter and discovery -- that's different.
This can also go the other way. I used to be friends with a very dear
man, a tender, gentle, sympathetic, understanding man who taught first
grade for many years and was considered one of the best teachers in the
school system. Everyone thought he would make an ideal father. But his
own father was an abusive alcoholic and when he had kids, the pressure
of trying to support his family pushed him into drinking and he
re-enacted his father's behavior. He's now in counselling learning how
to break the cycle, but it's not easy.
My advice is to go for it. Kids are wonderful; the rewards far
outweigh the difficulties.
On the other hand, don't let anybody push you into it if it's not
what you want!
--bonnie
|
354.12 | Another child's experience | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | I haven't lost my mind - it's Backed-up on tape somewhere | Wed Jul 01 1987 18:15 | 41 |
| My mother was 31 and handicapped when I was born, and my step-father
(from infancy) was 41 years older than I.
When I was 10 he had his first (of many) heart attacks. When I
was 12, he came down with Tuberculosis. When I was 16 he had his
first of several strokes. I spent my college years taking care
of my parents and little brother. I never got to do all of the
partying that most other people who went to college got to do.
I didn't go camping until I was 23. I did extremely little dating
(almost none) after my step-father's stroke until my mother divorced
him, then got into a relationship with the first person who was
nice to me after that. Doomed to failure from the beginning. Now,
I do not want children because, according to what I've worked out
with my therapist, I have already *had* more responsibility than
I want, in a sense, I've already raised my family and have no desire
to do it again.
I am not saying that all older parents will leave their children
with this kind of situation, but it is one to consider. If you
are 40 when they are born, you will be 62 when they get out of college.
Will you be able to do things with/for them like other parents do?
I do see the other side, that younger parents are concerned with
too little money, careers, etc., that may make postponing parenthood
wise for them.
However, there are advantages to having older parents. My mother
particularly was very patient with all of the little things that I and
my brother did as children. For example, when I was about 3 I colored
the newly painted walls. Rather than spanking me, which would have
only proved she was bigger than me, she said "Ok, now that you've
colored the walls, you can clean them". She got out some cleaner,
showed me how to use it, and sat there and watched me spend over an
hour cleaning it (an eternity to a 3 year old!). I still remembered
it, didn't particularly like cleaning the walls, and never did that
again. I can site other such cases that I would not even think of
trying.
Just another child's experience,
Elizabeth
|
354.13 | Older Parents | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | success hasn't spoiled me yet | Thu Jul 02 1987 17:35 | 83 |
| I was also the child of older parents. One regret I have always
had, and will always have, but that obviously can't be helped,
is that I never got to see or know my parents as young people.
I've seen pictures and heard stories, but it's not the same. I've
only known their middle-aged and elderly years.
My mother was 36 and my father 48 when I was born. I grew up in
the 50's and 60's when everyone else, or so it seemed, had parents
who were about 20 when they had kids. The first time I became aware
of having older parents was one day in the fourth grade when my
father dropped me off a school during recess. My father's hair
had turned completely white by the time he was 50. I can't remember
him with brown hair. This particular day a lot of kids playing
at recess saw me be dropped off by my father. One of the girls
asked me if that was my grandfather. I said, no. It was my father.
The other little girl said, "You have an old man for a father."
Then, about 3 little girls started chanting at me, "Lorna has an
old man for a father. Lorna has an old man for a father." Kids
hate to be made to feel different and I can still remember how awful
I felt. I was too young to rationalize that the other kids were
just ignorant idiots, and too shy and polite to tell them to go
to hell, like I would today. But, today more and more people are
having kids at older ages so perhaps the above cruel little scene
would never happen again.
Other negative experiences of having older parents were my father
suffering a heart attack at the age of 62 when I was 13. He had
to retire, and since he had no pension, we lived on social security
all during the time I was in high school. Needless to say, we were
rather poor, and all I heard during high school was, "Remember we
can't give you any money. Whatever you do after high school you're
on your own. We can't send you to college. We can't
pay for a wedding if you get married. So you'd better get a job."
My father died of a heart attack when I was 27 and he was 75. If
he were alive now he would be 86 years old. Most people my age
have grandparents that age. I guess I've always kind of felt that
I would have had him around longer if he hadn't waited so long to
have kids, kind of like I got cheated.
This past March my mother had an artery break in her head. She
has recovered physically, but mentally is totally disoriented.
She doesn't really know who we are or understand much of what's
going on. Now my brother and I are having to find a nursing home
to place her in as she can't be left unattended, and trying to figure
how out to apply for medicaid, etc. When you have older parents
you deal with having elderly parents at a much younger age, 37,
for example, instead of 60. Having your parents grow old and die
is a horrible experience and I, for one, would have liked to have
put it off another 20 years if possible.
Another negative aspect was due to the times I was growing up in.
My parents were very old fashioned. They didn't believe in drinking,
having sex before marriage, swearing, smoking, drugs (obviously).
I was a teenager in the 60's so the conflict was pretty violent
at times.
I had my daughter when I was 24. Now she's 13 and I'm 37 and we
have definitely shared some experiences that my mother and I never
did. For example, we have drooled together at rock concerts over
Billy Idol and Jon Bon Jovi. We have borrowed one another's clothes.
I overheard my daughter say to a friend a couple weeks ago, "It's
great to have a mother with good taste!" :-). I love being able
to deal with my daughter more and more as an equal, instead of as
an adult and a child. Even though I think women should have children
at whatever age they want, I find myself thinking of having a baby
as something that I did when I was practically a kid. At the time
she was born I was very into having a baby, now I couldn't imagine
ever wanting to again.
As far as the patience factor of older mothers goes, that is an
individual thing. My mother had more patience with little kids
when she was in her late 30's and early 40's than many women ever
do. She used to read to me, and play dolls with me, and even color
with me by the hour.
I guess it's a toss-up. I have often wished my parents were younger,
but I am amazed sometimes talking to other people my age that so
many seem to be nowhere near as close to their parents as I was.
They made a lot of mistakes but I still loved them.
Lorna
|
354.14 | a bit of perspective perhaps? | YAZOO::B_REINKE | hdn laughter of children in trees | Thu Jul 02 1987 22:32 | 9 |
| Lorna - My Mom was 31 when I was born and my Dad 33 - they went
on to have two more children - the youngest being born when my
Dad was 41. I can relate to much of what you are talking about -
especially as it affected my youngest sister (who by the way
had her first baby at 34). But one thing Lissa always said when
asked if she wished thaour folks had had their last baby sooner
- was "no, because then that baby wouldn't have been me!"
Bonnie
|
354.15 | Having children young, YES! | TALLIS::BASTINE | | Fri Jul 10 1987 14:22 | 44 |
| I guess I have always been a believer in having children at a young
age. My parents had me when they were 20 and my brother when they
were 22. I am 23 now, and have no children. I am married and I
hope to start a family as soon as God feels it is right.
My family and I have always been very close. My parents to my brother
and I are friends, not family. When my brother gets married he
wants to have my dad be the best man. They are best friends, and
my mother and I are the same. Before I got married (I got married
a year ago) my mother and I talked all the time about ANYTHING.
My mother had a very open mind, and I honestly believe it is because
of the closeness in age (after all 20 years isn't a big difference).
Today we can still talk about anything. My husband and I spend
countless hours with my parents. We go away together because we
enjoy each others company. We have a ball! My parents are 44 and
43 today. Both of their children are grown and out on their own.
They can enjoy life now, travel, see the world, no more babysitters,
and they still have their health! They are still young and are
just beginning their life together.
The best thing about this situation is that I have a big family...
I still have all four of my grandparents and still have 2 great
grandparents!! We are all very close and it is wonderful to sit
down with my great grandfather and talk about his life which started
in 1892! He is wonderful as are all my grandparents and I feel VERY
privileged to still have them with me. I know my history, I don't
just hear about it. I dread the day I lose one of my great
grandparents, and it seems that most people in this note are talking
about what it was like to lose a parent at my age.
The benefits of having children young speak for themselves in my
eyes. Granted, as we grew up money was tight, but we are better
off today because of it. Parents are always so afraid they won't
be able to give their children the best of everything, and yes all
parents do want the best of everything for their kids... but sometimes
giving the best of everything can hurt more than it helps! My brother
and I never got EVERYTHING we ever wanted, we had to work for what
we got! I think it made us better people because of it. We don't
take things for granted.
Enough said, this is my first reply to the womannotes. I guess
I spoke my peice.
Renee
|
354.16 | THIS OLDER MOM HAS HER MOMENTS... | VAXUUM::MUISE | | Fri Jul 17 1987 14:24 | 28 |
| I was nearly 35 when I had my daughter.
For me, the negative side of having her so late is that I have a
really difficult time adjusting to the disappearance of "time for
me." After almost 35 years of being rather self-indulgent, I am
often in a state of frustration at the lack of time "for just me"
in my life.
When the weekend comes, I am initially excited to spend some good
time with Kelly (now 3), as I've been working all week. But by
Sunday morning, I wish I could sleep late, have a leisurely
brunch with my husband, and maybe just be a lazy slob all day!
Or perhaps I'd like to just once, get my housework and errands
done SOLO... without the constant attention and interruption
a child needs.
I don't mean to imply that a younger mother doesn't have the same
responsibilities, only that perhaps she doesn't miss the freedom
she never or seldom had, as I do.
As for how my daughter will feel about us, well my husband is
8 1/2 years younger than I, so she should have a fairly good
balance. And as to the joys of parenthood, they are like no other.
Good luck,
Jacki
|
354.17 | I CAN EMPATHIZE.. | CSCMA::HUGHES | | Wed Oct 28 1987 16:13 | 13 |
|
RE: 354.16
I CAN REALLY RELATE TO THE NOTE FROM 354.16. ALTHOUGH I AM 27 AND
JUST HAD A LITTLE ONE AND LOVE HIM DEARLY, I DO MISS THE QUIET TIME
THAT I USED TO BE ABLE TO SPEND WITH MY HUSBAND. NO ONE EVER PREPARES
YOU FOR MOTHERHOOD, YOU JUST ADJUST.
ON THE OTHER HAND, I AM GLAD THAT I DID HAVE HIM AT 27. I'M CONVINCED
THAT THE LATER IN LIFE YOU WAIT, THE HARDER IT IS TO ADJUST TO LIFE
WITH A CHILD.
D
|