T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
336.1 | | SUPER::HENDRICKS | Not another learning experience! | Tue Jun 16 1987 08:12 | 16 |
| I use them to avoid thinking about what the dentist is going to
do in a few minutes. |-)
They make me feel like a participant observer in a culture I will
never understand very well. There seem to be distinct types: look
beautiful, be a good homemaker/superwoman, and keep up with/get off
on the latest weirdness. The categories are typified by Vogue,
McCall's, and the National Enquirer. The only ones I ever pick up
are the McCall's type. I like the same articles Bonnie likes--the
feature articles about everyday women (not "stars"!) who are creatively
managing life's challenges.
I like flipping through them and reading 3 or 4 sentences per page
until I find something that interests me. It's like going to a
buffet and tasting a lot of things I would never actually order!
|
336.4 | Yes I'll confess | OURVAX::JEFFRIES | the best is better | Tue Jun 16 1987 11:30 | 4 |
| I'm a recipe freak, so I read almost any mag that has recipies.
If there are enough good ones in the mag I save the whole thing,
I have over 20 years Christmas issues of all the leading "Womens
magazines" Every year I take them out and use the recipies.
|
336.5 | What Do We Read | MANANA::RAVAN | | Tue Jun 16 1987 13:04 | 19 |
| I confess to reading Ladies Home Journal, Woman's Day, etc. now
and then - I usually pick them up at the supermarket, and indulge
in some nostalgia remembering the days when Mom would bring them
home. Mostly it's mind candy, something to thumb through while
unwinding from work, but I do pick up a few (very few!) exercise
tips, recipes, and now and then something interesting in mail-order.
I seldom read the fashion mags - far too many ads per page, and
since I only use makeup for costume parties nearly all of it is
irrelevant to me.
I used to read Cosmopolitan for giggles, but it rapidly got boring.
(I hate to tell you, Eagle, but the Cosmo view of the world is still
"Diamonds are a Girl's Best Friend"; I don't think you'll get much
enlightenment there!)
Should I confess to reading Playboy, too? The articles, of course!
-b
|
336.6 | Working Woman, New Woman, and Cosmo | WEBSTR::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Tue Jun 16 1987 13:12 | 32 |
| Since I like needlework and cooking, I read most of the so-called
'women's magazines' fairly often. The only ones I ever buy and read
for content, however, are Working Woman, New Woman, and Cosmo. (And
Ms., of course, but I'll assume we all know why we read that...even
though it's become so bleeping middle class lately.)
I like WW's very practical orientation to the problems of trying to
raise a family and hold a job at the same time. If you want ten
pointers on interviewing a babysitter, or creative suggestions for how
to make time for yourself in a busy world (how about getting a diver's
log and pen so you can write your journal entries in the tub?), and so
on, WW is a good place to look. (Not politically aware at all,
however.)
New Woman is too aware. It tends to be too ready to blame problems on
sexism and not encouraging enough about doing something for yourself.
It's good at diagnosing problems, but it spends more time assessing
blame than telling you what you personally can do about the problem. NW
is also pretty negative about having traditional interests -- I do
needlework because I like it, and yet New Woman leaves me feeling like
every time I touch a crochet hook, I've belittled the accomplishments
of generations of liberated women everywhere.
I like Cosmo because it's one of the few magazines for either sex that
conveys the idea that life can be FUN. Sex is fun, working is fun,
wearing new clothes is fun, falling in and out of love is fun. Job
difficulties and broken romances are just part of the game. I also
like the way it assumes that I am in control of my life. But sometimes
that attitude that "I am nothing without a man" can drive me up the
wall . . . or send me running for a convenient receptacle.
--bonnie
|
336.7 | wait while I get my asbestos suit | WEBSTR::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Tue Jun 16 1987 13:16 | 9 |
| Beth snuck in .5 while I was writing .6 -- how could I forget Playboy?
Though I will stick my neck way out here and admit that I like to look
at the pictures. I find the female body an aesthetically pleasing
sight, and I like the hundreds of different ways Playboy's
photographers find to highlight the infinity of moods, emotional tones,
and erotic feeling that a woman's body is able to express.
--bonnie
|
336.8 | Helen Gurly Brown's religion prevents her from wearing straps... | NEXUS::CONLON | Have a nice diurnal anomaly! | Tue Jun 16 1987 13:29 | 26 |
| Ok, I also admit that I read COSMO once or twice a year
(when I really want to escape into fantasy for an evening.)
The thing that I find curious is that every single article
in the magazine (or 99.9%) is in the form of examples of
supposedly real women. "Jeanie is a professional marketing
manager who makes $300,000 a year and owns a penthouse in
Manhatten. She was dating John, who often ignored her
and stood her up. She used to sit home and wait by the telephone
(crying her eyes out) til she met Harry, Dave and Phil. Now
she has a full sex life and only occasionally has crying fits
and beats her cat."
I mean -- give me a break!! The women in the examples are
unrealistically wealthy and unrealistically silly at the same
time. If I made $300,000 a year, I'd have gone to Europe and
told John to buzz off after the second date. :-) :-) :-)
However -- it is good for a laugh (and some of the articles
get me to thinking of interesting side issues.)
I love the advice they had about older women and younger men
(they said don't bother marrying them, just scr*w their brains
out for awhile.) :-) :-) Just a tad shallow...
Suzanne... ;-)
|
336.9 | Ok, Helen G.B. isn't that bad.... ;-) | NEXUS::CONLON | Have a nice diurnal anomaly! | Tue Jun 16 1987 13:33 | 10 |
| P.S. Ok, I exaggerated ... it isn't really that bad and
I do read it more often than twice a year. ;-)
I, too, think it's sort of neat to hear about fun lives,
sex and all. And it doesn't hurt to hear about successful
women (even if they *do* do temporarily silly things.)
It is more fun to read than thought-provoking, though.
Suzanne... ;-)
|
336.10 | shall we go buy some mink underwear? | WEBSTR::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Tue Jun 16 1987 13:48 | 19 |
| I don't mean to start an argument here over what is a relatively
trivial point --
But is it necessary that everything we read be thought-provoking and
serious in order for us not to feel apologetic about reading it? I
know I seldom admit to other "liberated" women that I read Cosmo.
The argument gets too heated.
But there is a time and a place for "fun", whether you want to call it
"fun" or "mind candy" or "silly" or "shallow". I will be the first to
admit that if you tried to live your life *only* according to Cosmo's
principles, you would be, in the present slang, one sick puppy. On the
other hand that doesn't mean you should never, for example, have a
relation based only on sex or spend an entire month's pay on an evening
gown for one gala party. Maybe I won't ever do either of these
(haven't yet) but I don't care to rule out the possibility, either.
--bonnie
|
336.11 | Helen isn't Gloria, but she isn't exactly Phyllis either... | NEXUS::CONLON | Have a nice diurnal anomaly! | Tue Jun 16 1987 14:16 | 12 |
| RE: .10
You're right, Bonnie. We can't be serious all the time,
and although COSMO may be a little unreal, sometimes I'm
in the mood for just that!!
I was just teasing myself (cuz I realize that I come across
in this file as taking myself waaaaaaay too seriously about
99.999999999999% of the time.) ;-) ;-)
Suzanne... ;-)
|
336.12 | | PARITY::DDAVIS | Dotti | Tue Jun 16 1987 15:19 | 6 |
| I am sort of a "health nut", so I read Prevention Magazine and American
Health.
Oh, and I subscribe to National Geographic, too.
I used to read Cosmo, too, but I think I out-grew it. ;-)
|
336.14 | Miscellaneous Ramblings while Compiling... | XANADU::RAVAN | | Tue Jun 16 1987 15:36 | 43 |
| I hope nobody minds if I branch out a little from the original topic
(the so-called "women's magazines"), but I've found that reading
magazines from some sub-culture other than your own can be an
inexpensive (and relatively painless) way to get a look at the world
from some other viewpoints. For example, reading "Cosmo" will show you
a different mind-set from that reflected in "Woman's Day," which is
different from "Redbook," and so forth. To go further, try comparing
the tone and content of articles in "Cosmo" to "Soldier of Fortune" or
"Writer's Digest". How about "Ebony" - ever read that?
Even though the readership of this conference varies from the
fresh-out-of-school new hire to management, and includes engineers,
secretaries, writers, and others, this is still a fairly narrow
slice of the world population. To really broaden one's viewpoint
it takes contact with groups that one normally doesn't interact
with. For those who, like me, view such contact with stark fear,
checking out a few books or magazines can at least give a toehold
into an "alien" culture.
For example, I think it would be fascinating to read some labor-union
publications; no one in my family has ever belonged to a union,
and I know little about it outside of the history books and the
front page of the newspaper. The day-to-day details from a magazine
or newsletter aimed at the just-plain-folks might prove enlightening.
Back (sort of) to the original topic: Another "women's magazine"
that I read is "Weight Watchers." It's my husband who has the weight
problem, and he's done very well on the program; in fact, both of
us eat more nutritious meals because of it. I read the magazine
to get new recipes (hoping that he'll cook one or two of them!),
but I've found that, while the intent of the mag is to promote the
weight-loss program, most of its readers are women, and the focus
is primarily female. (I find myself doing a lot of mental translation
in order to see if the articles are applicable to my husband.) I
think that this has become an inertia problem with some publications;
men won't read them because they are aimed at women, but there is
no incentive for the publishers to broaden their scope because they
get no comment from men. (And vice versa, of course.)
Does anybody think there *should* be "women's magazines", rather
than "cooking" or "homemaking" or "stock investment" magazines???
-b
|
336.15 | Anything, But TV! | WARLRD::CFLETCHER | Short Stuff | Tue Jun 16 1987 16:00 | 23 |
|
Hi, y'all!
Since 99% or so of TV is brainless mush, I read alot! (Rich gets
mad when I make fun of Miami Vice, and tell him what's going to
happen ahead of time - a 5 year old could figure it out!)
Love to read any magazines about Fine Art - American Artists, etc.
Read Family Circle and Women's Days sometimes - depend if they have
good recipies, and/or articles. (I forget which one - June issue,
I believe had a nice article about a guy with an autistic son.)
Rich gets Penthouse and other "men's" magazines - I read some and look
at the pictures. Sometimes we look at them together - it can be
fun, if you don't take it seriously.
And, I do read Cosmo. It's fun. And sometimes even has good articles!
:-)!
Bye!
Corinne
|
336.16 | | CADSYS::SULLIVAN | Karen - 225-4096 | Tue Jun 16 1987 16:03 | 13 |
| I guess I have stereotyped "women's magazines" as those that are like RedBook
and Womans Day. I lump those found at the register in the supermarket as
"women's magazines". I guess I never thought that magazines for women that
don't include a diet, an exercise program and a fattening dessert were
considered "women's magazines". In that case, I get Ms. but only because
it was a gift. It has some interesting information in it, but I don't really
like it that much. It's pretty sexist in its own way.
The other magazines that I get are Home Mechanix, Consumer Reports, Reader's
Digest and another one like Home Mechanix put out by Rodale Press.
Hmmm, what was the question?
...Karen
|
336.18 | | NISYSI::KING | 2/5/88! | Tue Jun 16 1987 16:35 | 6 |
| My wife and I read Home and Home and Garden magazine.
Are these mags considered womens, mens or both?
REK
PS What's your opinion?
|
336.20 | I love it. | WEBSTR::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Tue Jun 16 1987 17:07 | 5 |
| Gosh, Popular Mechanics is one of my favorite magazines.
when I can afford it.
--bonnie
|
336.21 | an in my magazine rack... | COLORS::IANNUZZO | Catherine T. | Tue Jun 16 1987 17:12 | 3 |
| The only magazine I currently get is Road and Track. I also pick up
occasional issues of magazines with good crochet patterns. (Never know
when you might want a lace carburetor cover).
|
336.22 | | GCANYN::TATISTCHEFF | | Wed Jun 17 1987 00:55 | 19 |
| when stuck for something to read in a dentist's office, I will try
one of 'em: Ladies Home Journal, etc.
Have to put them back on the table because they make me so mad.
"woman w/o man is nothing, and certainly not *happy*!!!"
phooey. Recipes are neat, but I don' have time for them anyway;
cooking for one tends to discourage me from thinking a whole lot
about food preparation.
Of womyn's works, I read a little lesbian fiction, but find the
longer stuff to be somewhat poorly written and obtuse. Short lesbian
writing has a LOT of fantastic, biting, loving, well-put together
stuff.
Although I shouldn't limit that to lesbian fiction: a lot of women
of different sexual orientations are putting out good fiction these
days.
Lee
|
336.24 | Why is it "lucky"? | CADSYS::SULLIVAN | Karen - 225-4096 | Wed Jun 17 1987 11:40 | 9 |
| RE: .23
> Lucky for women because in their finding they
> concluded that a greter part of the budget was spent on magazines....
So, does that mean that they will continue to buy more magazines?
Will they stop classifying "women's magazines" as different? I hope
so. That's like classifying women separate from everyone else who
have a much broader range of interests (women don't?). Do you know
what the men were trying to find out when they asked?
|
336.25 | Dullsville | ULTRA::ZURKO | UI:Where the rubber meets the road | Wed Jun 17 1987 13:13 | 5 |
| CACM, SIGCHI, HFS, and Tech review...
But when I read a book, it's almost always a classic or criticism
of a classic (Shakespeare), or feminist or women oriented.
Mez
|
336.26 | What I read... | PARITY::TILLSON | box of rain | Wed Jun 17 1987 13:30 | 20 |
|
Yeah, I read "women's" magazines when I visit my mother and
grandmother. They get Women's Day, McCall's, Good Housekeeping.
There is not enough substance to many of these magazines for me
to want to run out and buy them, but they _do_ give me topics for
valid and valuable conversations with mom and grandma.
I subscribe to: Scientific American, Time, Life, Analog, Architechtural
Digest, American Artist, TV Guide, and Omni. I cancelled Playgirl
when they changed their format. I am considering cancelling Omni,
since every issue I've read in the last few months has had at least
one article I considered sexist and offensive.
Books? Mostly Science Fiction, feminist authors, religion, and
mysticism. Our landlord couldn't understand why we wanted to rent
a 3 bedroom house for the two of us, until he saw the movers hauling
in over 5000 books :^)
Rita
|
336.27 | worn out two pairs of glasses | BUFFER::LEEDBERG | Truth is Beauty, Beauty is Truth | Wed Jun 17 1987 13:46 | 18 |
|
Over the past 5 years I have stopped reading almost all magazines,
execpt MS for some content and People for relaxing before seeing
the dentist or doctor.
I do read a lot of books, almost all of them by women especially
Scifi with female protagonists.
Lately I have been reading a LOT of literature on Feminist Thealogy
and compiling a recommeded reading list. If anyone has suggestions
of material that I could add send me mail. I am looking for music
as well and have been reading up on composers who are women.
_peggy
(-)
| Is there a magazine about the craft?
|
336.28 | From A[chitectural Digest] to Y[ankee] | GNUVAX::QUIRIY | Noter Dame | Wed Jun 17 1987 18:59 | 17 |
|
I like a lot of different magazines. I'll buy a "women's mag" if
there's a really tasty looking something on the cover. Sometimes the
human interest stories are good. I used to buy Ladie's Home Journal
for the "It Isn't Easy Being a Woman..." feature which used to pay
$200 (?) if your story was accepted for publication, and I'd always
read the "Will This Marriage Work?" feature. I _still_ think the
"Do's and Don't's" column in Glamour is funny.
I like Yankee, Handwoven (I've got a loom but never use it), Travel
and Liesure (I like to dream), National Geographic, Natural History,
Smithsonian, The Utne Reader (differing viewpoints from all over?),
Bon Apetit, Gourmet (I like to cook and eat), People (I'm a sucker for
gossip), Time and/or Newsweek, Scientific American, The Mother Earth
News (it fuels the homesteading fantasy), and Architectural Digest.
CQ
|
336.29 | | CHAPLN::ROSENTHAL | I REALLY need a vacation! | Thu Jun 18 1987 14:23 | 7 |
|
New Woman Family Circle
Newsweek Woman's Day
Better Homes & Gardens National Gardening Assoc.
Good Housekeeping 1,001 Home Ideas
Country Living Playboy
Golf Illustrated
|
336.30 | | CHAPLN::ROSENTHAL | I REALLY need a vacation! | Thu Jun 18 1987 14:25 | 8 |
|
New Woman Family Circle
Newsweek Woman's Day
Better Homes & Gardens National Gardening Assoc.
Good Housekeeping 1,001 Home Ideas
Country Living Playboy
Golf Illustrated Consumer Reports
|
336.31 | Mostly hobby-related | NAC::BENCE | Shetland Pony School of Problem Solving | Thu Jun 18 1987 14:50 | 11 |
|
Subscribe Occasional
Newsweek People
Practical Homeowner Bon Appetit
Consumer Reports New Yorker
Cooks Magazine MS
Petit Propos Culinaire Byte
Herb Quarterly National Geographic
Just Crossstitch
TV Guide ;-/
|
336.32 | it only takes 3 seconds to see sex! | JUNIOR::TASSONE | And it only gets better | Fri Jun 26 1987 15:59 | 17 |
| People.
I picked up a Vogue magazine last week at my doctor's office and
nearly puked at all the smutty, sexual, exploited advertisement
that goes on in there. I understand that advertisers have to sell
a product and they feel that 'sex sells', well, why not try to speak
truthfully about the product instead of using 'subliminal' seductions.
Did you ever look REAL close at those ice cubes in cocktail glasses?
They are fake and are often touched up.
One page dipicted a woman 'on her back' with a guy's hand holding
an ice cube and letting it melt on her neck. It showed the melting
of the ice cube in the center of her neck but on it's way to her
breasts.
This was an ad for perfume. Geeeesh!
|
336.33 | "Nine Women" | NYOB::KOLANKOWSKI | | Wed Aug 19 1987 15:54 | 8 |
| A really good book of short stories about women written by a woman
is
Nine Women, by Shirley Ann Grau
I generally dislike short stories, but she really makes you want
to read more about each woman.
Aline
|
336.34 | couldn't put her down! | SKYLIT::SAWYER | i'll take 2 myths and 3 traditions...to go.. | Fri Aug 28 1987 16:42 | 9 |
|
e.m. delafied....
diary(ies..5 of 'em) of a provinciaal lady.
lauriets has em.
wise, witty, wonderful!
|