T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
332.1 | watching what THEY say... | ARGUS::CORWIN | I don't care if I AM a lemming | Tue Jun 09 1987 12:35 | 15 |
| I don't find myself watching what I say, but maybe that's because I'm familiar
enough with the people I associate with to know they won't take it "wrong" or
analyze it. Or maybe I just don't care if they do take it wrong, because I'm
sure enough of myself. There are both men and women that I associate with, at
different times or the same time, and I never find myself especially watching
what I say. Of course, I don't often end up saying things I "shouldn't", but
if the topic turns to x, I'll talk about x too!
What irks me is when the men I associate with feel they have to watch what THEY
say. Saying a "bad word" and then saying "oh, sorry" or "pardon my French" or
something similar annoys me. Either say it and don't apologize for it, or don't
say it at all! Especially when I've already indicated that it doesn't bother
me.
Jill
|
332.2 | why is it your fault he's a sexist? | WEBSTR::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Tue Jun 09 1987 13:19 | 14 |
| I guess maybe I have a problem here too -- I'm not quite sure what this
man said that you felt meant you had to be virgin? and watch everything
you say?
In that context, it seems like "Now I know why Eric hired you" could be
anything from a veiled accusation that you're sleeping with "eric"
(whoever that is) to a compliment on "eric"'s good judgement in hiring
a woman with such an open mind and clear insight into the problems of
life.
The most likely interpretation is that it's a sexist remark on this
man's part. In what way is that YOUR fault???????
--bonnie, puzzled
|
332.3 | Why? | 3D::AUSTIN | Dull women have immaculate homes. | Tue Jun 09 1987 13:21 | 25 |
|
I just went downstairs for lunch. I was really in the mood
for a hot dog (though god knows why - they usually taste horrible),
and the only ones they had were the foot long. Well, sure enough
someone walks by and makes a comment that it looked obscene. Of
course I thought so too and said so. The reply was "I know what
you're thinking of." Now, if I were a guy and agreed that it looked
obscene...would I have gotten that same reply?
I guess women are still supposed to be (act?) nieve and when
one says things which imply that she is not, then does it have to
mean she's a sleeze? Sometimes it really seems like that's how
it's perceived.
Also, it seems to me that a "career" woman is supposed to be
all work - professionalism - and the guys can joke around all they
want and still be considered professional.
jean
|
332.4 | Off color "humor" in professional settings | PNEUMA::SULLIVAN | | Tue Jun 09 1987 14:00 | 15 |
| I think in general we all could be more careful about what we say.
Certainly, among friends/co-workers with whom we're friendly, there's
some flexibilty about what's appropriate, but I was really shocked
at what happened in a meeting I was in yesterday. I was the only
women, and someone couldn't remember something, and the meeting-leader
said, "Memory's the second thing to go," and then followed it with
a real *lusty* laugh so there was no mistaking what the "first thing"
was. In another context, I probably wouldn't have been offended,
but it seemed completely inappropriate to me in a meeting. And
I felt unable to say how I did feel about it. I wonder if other
women have been in similar situations: you're offended but feel
unable to say so. Are there any brave souls out there who actually
have spoken up? If so, how did it go?
Justine
|
332.7 | Minor flame | XANADU::RAVAN | | Tue Jun 09 1987 14:52 | 47 |
| Re .6:
MIXED COMPANY???
Do you mean to state that women are intrinsically more sensitive
than men? That they need to be protected from uncouth remarks (which,
obviously, men are more prone to make)?
Grrr... It has always annoyed me when women are presumed to require
additional shelter, protection, and so forth. It repeats the old
double standard. Men are beasts and women are saints. Men like vulgar
humor, women don't. Men can be crude and offensive to each other,
but not to women.
Please, please don't use the term "mixed company" to guide the types of
conversation that should be permitted. People - either sex - who enjoy
crude humor, profanity, puns, etc. should have the courtesy to refrain
from indulging in it in the presence of those - either sex - whom they
*know* to dislike it. And persons who dislike it should make their
dislike known - politely; otherwise they can hardly expect it to
stop. (Of course, politeness doesn't always work, but it's worth
a try.)
As for the general topic of what to do when someone drops an
unpleasant-sounding innuendo: My favorite response comes from Miss
Manners. While I haven't had the nerve to try it (nor, fortunately,
much opportunity), she recommends simply asking, "Why, what do you
mean by that?" in a non-threatening, rather naive tone.
"Now I know why Eric hired you."
"Why, what do you mean?"
"Um, er, well, come on, *you* know..."
"Actually, I don't. I thought he hired me because I'm a good software
engineer. Why do you think he hired me?"
"Um, er, never mind..."
They may consider you a bad sport - but then, did you really want
to impress such persons? Or they may come right out and explain,
in which case you can set them straight.
Not perfect, but better than going home and snarling at the cat.
-b
|
332.8 | Social Hours are out! | JUNIOR::TASSONE | And it only gets better | Tue Jun 09 1987 15:11 | 15 |
| This topic shows the reason why I don't socialize with my group
(department) after work. I went to lunch once and I really put
my foot in my mouth. People act differently after work (social
hours) and tend to be more flippant, joking, and yes, crude. But,
people don't forget and they see you the next day in your suit and
say, "are you the same person that went out last night?".
I don't "have to" handle this because I don't choose to and that's
MY problem. If someone says something to me and I "take it" the
wrong way, I think I am going to try the previous suggestion "what
did/do you mean by that?"
That's a good one and I like it.
Cathy (who'd much rather stick to business and avoid personal comments)
|
332.9 | Taboo: the last thing to go | CADSE::GLIDEWELL | | Tue Jun 09 1987 21:46 | 50 |
|
>.4 and someone couldn't remember something, and the meeting-leader
> said, "Memory's the second thing to go," and then followed it with
> a real *lusty* laugh so there was no mistaking what the "first thing"
> was. In another context, I probably wouldn't have been offended,
> but it seemed completely inappropriate to me in a meeting.
Feel welcome to flame back, but this does not strike me as being rude
or inappropriate. But you were there, I'm only seeing the words.
>been in similar situations: you're offended but feel unable to say so.
>any brave souls who actually have spoken up?
1971. University lecture, sex ed, 500 students, and the professor said
something about "liberated women getting abortions." I stood up,
interrupted, and said approximately "humorous comments about liberated
women were not appropriate with people dying in alleys from amateur
abortions." It was a number 10 hard task, but looking back, I did it
because the insult was gross. In fact, I didn't think about saying
something, astonishment propelled me. One doesn't tell crispy critter
jokes while the forest is still burning.
BUT, I am a little perturbed that a lot of us seem to be uncomfotable
with sexual references and innudendo.
re .4 *lusty laugh* seemed to be a comment about life; it was not
aimed at you so I'm missing the point.
re .0 "now I know why eric hired you" was aimed and would make a lot
of us feel self conscious and turn on Ye Olde Word Watcher.
Many years ago, some sex education classes began with the students reciting
taboo words (both crude and anatomical), saying the words 20 times, with the
worthy purpose of desensitizing the words. Removing their power. What I
wonder is, why do so many comments, jokes, innuendos evoke a negative
response?
because of an intent or disparagement felt behind them?
because so much of sex itself is still taboo?
An observation from my experience: I know lots of women comedians
who, because of their profession, have been totally desensitized to all
sexual and scatalogical references. They can say/hear *ANYTHING* to/from
*ANYBODY. And they find this *EXTREMELY LIBERATING* (as in words will
never hurt me, you blanky blank!). And they are quite good at telling
an insult or demeaning comment from an un-aimed joke. (.3 Re the long
hot dog: They would promise to be gentle.)
Meigs
|
332.10 | A side of woman is missing | STUBBI::B_REINKE | the fire and the rose are one | Tue Jun 09 1987 22:37 | 12 |
| This reminds me a bit of the older woman character in Falstaff -
who is kind of a archetype. The knowledgable older married woman
- now a widow. She understands mens' lusts and is not constrained
to hide her knowledge....it seems we have not delt with or incorporated
this side of woman into our modern archetype.....is it possible
for 'nice' (i.e. not casually or promiscuously sexually available
to 'understand' (i.e. admit to knowledge of) off color remarks,
jokes, and innuendos? My usual response to such remarks is to say
that I am a married woman and have sons - i.e. of course I understand
what they are talking about!
Bonnie J
|
332.11 | Did I miss the joke? | MAY20::MINOW | It's only rock and roll | Wed Jun 10 1987 01:07 | 8 |
| I always thought it went:
Memory is the second thing to go.
I forgot what the first thing was.
Martin
|
332.12 | | HUMAN::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Wed Jun 10 1987 02:15 | 35 |
| JimB. commences to insert foot in mouth...
Personally, I am not sure that concern about "mixed company" is
necessarily sexist. It is a lot safer to joke about sexual
matters with people who are not potential objects of one's own
sexual interest, than with one in whom one might have an
interest.
That I might speak of certain things in the presence of
heterosexual men, that I would be uneasy saying in front of
women or homosexual men may indicate not that I think that women
are weaker (or that gay men are), but that the potential for
misunderstanding is higher.
As it stands I personally am often LESS comfortable around men
than women, but I can understand the issue.
To dig the old foot a little deeper into my mouth... I could
easily read the "Now I know why Eric hired you." as saying that
a woman who was willing to be herself and to be "one of the
guys" is a moderately rare thing, and valuable. Of course it
would depend on how the line was delivered. I would recommend
against letting it bother you if possible. So long as we are
always careful about what we say around members of the opposite
sex and expect the worst of them we can never overcome the
problems and limitations that are too common.
Even amongst "the guys" we blow it and say something that was
inappropriate. A hard lesson to learn (at least it was for ME)
is that these things happen and if we focus on them we can make
it much worse. If we let it show that the comment came off
wrong, but shrug it off, the natural processes of interaction
will often work the problem out.
JimB.
|
332.13 | Or, you could just reply | MAY20::MINOW | It's only rock and roll | Wed Jun 10 1987 09:44 | 14 |
| re: 332.3
> I just went downstairs for lunch. I was really in the mood
> for a hot dog (though god knows why - they usually taste horrible),
> and the only ones they had were the foot long. Well, sure enough
> someone walks by and makes a comment that it looked obscene. Of
> course I thought so too and said so. The reply was "I know what
> you're thinking of." Now, if I were a guy and agreed that it looked
> obscene...would I have gotten that same reply?
The correct response is to look the guy straight in the eye and
say, with a straight face, "I'm afraid they were all out of tacos."
Martin.
|
332.14 | my $.02 worth | LEZAH::BOBBITT | Festina Lente - Hasten Slowly | Wed Jun 10 1987 10:25 | 24 |
| I went to a tech high school and was the 2nd woman to graduate from
the electronics cluster there. The first graduated two years before
me. Therefore I spent a LOT of time (all day, every day, every
other week) in shop with them. They were often crude and rude,
sometimes purposefully so when I was around. But something happened
to me then....I began to talk dirtier than they did sometimes, to
out-gross them so they would shut up. Pretty soon I was at the
top level of "innuendo & filthy pun" makers. This had the desired
effect of getting them to lay off me and let me do my work in peace
(fortunately there were some people there who made decent lab
partners), but when I left high school for college it took me a
long time to unlearn these actions. Sometimes, even now, I think
of something disgustingly clever to say, but smile inwardly knowing
it would do more harm than good to say it. Maybe some people never
choose to unlearn their activities because they don't feel it's
necessary. Some people get a jolt out of shocking others, or laughing
at them at the onlooker's expense (like construction workers sometimes
do). But old habits die hard - and until people see a need to change
their ways of thinking, or "make the jokes, laugh with everyone
in a friendly way, and forget about who's there as we're all friends",
then this awkward attempt at making gruff-and-chummy contact will
be thwarted, and the gap between many men and women will never close.
-Jody
|
332.15 | sexual joke comeback styles? | ULTRA::ZURKO | UI:Where the rubber meets the road | Wed Jun 10 1987 11:32 | 8 |
| We could be getting into "vibes" territory again. I can tell when a
coworker is making a dirty joke _with_ me, and when they're making one
_at_ me. Certainly the author of .0 felt it was _at_. Bonnie was right:
teach them, not you. In whatever way is best for you. The alternatives
are: Ms. Manners "naiveity", sincerity, and a corresponding comeback
to make them as violated as you felt (and remember to laugh after you
make it :-}). Any other styles that work?
Mez
|
332.16 | I'm ready now... | TSG::TAUBENFELD | Almighty SET | Wed Jun 10 1987 11:41 | 8 |
| Thank you for all the replies so far. The Miss Manners Method of
playing naive is a good ploy, and I will remember it if and when
it happens again.
As far as letting it bother me, it did only to the extent to ask
other people's opinions. I would NEVER take it out on my cats!
;-}
|
332.17 | tacky, tacky, tacky | VINO::EVANS | | Wed Jun 10 1987 13:17 | 16 |
| I've used two methods, well, maybe more with variations.
I like the "naivete'", but with the added fillip of pursuing it
in the supposed desire to understand it. "Huh?" They'll try to shrug
it off at this point. "No, I really want to know" "What did you
mean??" etc. Pretty soon, the whole thing seems stupid to them,
and with any luck, they'll remember how tacky it was.
The other method I use (having been a schoolteacher helps - somehow,
that "tone" of voice the teacher used when you were in trouble never
leaves your memory - kinda like your mother using your middle name)
is to say "Tacky, tacky, tacky" in that sing-song voice that
immediately brings to mind "naughty, naughty, naughty".
Dawn
|
332.18 | nieve? Is that okay these days? | 3D::AUSTIN | Dull women have immaculate homes. | Wed Jun 10 1987 19:46 | 15 |
|
I really wish I had more time to read these notes files. They
are so full of great advice. And I don't want to seem like I'm
not interested in what's going on in here, especially after I've
written in myself.
Thanks for the TACO response...I'll have to remember that.
Playing "nieve" hits a nerve with me. Probably because for
so long I really was nieve and I felt like I was ridiculed for it.
We're going back some years now to where I was around 13 and everyone
else knew what was going on and I really didn't. So, I was the
one to pick on... Unfortunately, it seems there still is that element
today.
|
332.19 | I coulda been a contenda | CADSE::GLIDEWELL | | Wed Jun 10 1987 21:55 | 22 |
| < re .14 by BOBBITT
> I began to talk dirtier than they did sometimes, to
> out-gross them so they would shut up. Pretty soon I was at the
> top level of "innuendo & filthy pun" makers.
You desensitized yourself so you were never in danger of swooning when
some dimwit decided to get one up on you. (That may seem an overstatement
but a classmate once said something soooo raw to me I was not only
speechless but dizzy.)
Can you tell us, do you think because of your experience that you
are less likely to take offense or exception to sexual references?
I think you would be far less likely to do this than a person who has
never even said god damn it.
I could do well in a cuss out contest, and while I wouldn't dream of
entering one, I'm glad to be a contenda. The fewer 'frightening things' in
the world the better. And words can frighten. Meigs
|
332.20 | a two-edged sword | LEZAH::BOBBITT | Festina Lente - Hasten Slowly | Thu Jun 11 1987 11:51 | 35 |
| I am less likely to take offense at what others say, but because
I can "hear" all of the jokes - and understand them for the indecencies
that they are - I seem to have this counter in my mind which clicks
them off. If someone has too much fun at my expense - whether I
reacted openly or not - I tend to hold a grudge sometimes. Maybe
that's one way some people communicate, and I sometimes take it
more seriously than I should....
Also, I worked at a company a while ago that had lots of field service
men (no, there were no field service women because, as the guys
said, in order to be able to carry the equipment they'd have to
be as big and ugly as a moose). They didn't realize I caught on
to much of what they were saying (particularly when prospective
female secretarial hires came in the door). But this had something
to do with the whole "us vs. them" male comeraderie blue-collar
thing that sometimes goes on. Like construction workers. Also,
since I was not a lithe and lissome lass of size seven or less,
I was never "manhandled" like a friend named Laurie in high school,
two years younger, she was majoring in electronics and the guys
would walk by and (uninvited) pat her on the bottom or squeeze her
sides or whatever - and then the teacher would accuse her of trying
to disrupt the class!). Maybe I put on some weight to "insulate"
myself from their potential actions - or maybe just to have more
substance and feel more powerful. I began dressing like the guys
(jeans and plaid shirts), and didn't do my hair or makeup, and
generally was "on-guard" all the time.
If I had it to do over - I'd do it different. But my experience
was definitely a two-edged sword. Sometimes it brings more peace
of mind not knowing some of the innuendos were ever made. And,
in a sometimes sexist world, it gets so hard to forgive so pervasive
an "insult".
-Jody
|
332.21 | | PASTIS::MONAHAN | | Thu Jul 02 1987 01:05 | 5 |
| One should also allow for cultural differences. I gave a literal
translation of a poster sponsored by the French government, and
an American girl was visibly shocked. How much one should express
judgement of a culture within a society may be a matter for debate,
but from outside one should be very careful.
|