T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
323.1 | You better think twice.... | COMET::AIKALA | Dancing in the sheets | Fri May 22 1987 08:15 | 22 |
|
Somehow, and I don't know this for sure, but I don't think
(I hope not!) there are any fathers out there who are taking
their daughters into the men's room "whilst" they do their
thing. As a male, I cannot explain why this wouldn't apply
to little boys with mommy in the ladies room, but it would
be the sorriest of judgements or rationalizing to take a
young "girl-child" into the mens room, simply for this fact:
Women do not have urinals. Women are always behind a door,
unless the restroom has been vandalized, like the majority of
mens rooms are. A little girl walking into a mens facility
is going to see a lot more activity going on than a little
boy in the ladies room. I am talking strictly about the "act"
which takes place behind a closed door. I don't know that
women may do other personal hygene matters beyond the door.
As .0 related, the boy had to look "under" the door. Upon
which he should have been healthily cuffed about the head. If
the boy is displaying this type of curiosity "just once", either
teach him to know better, or discontinue the accompaniment bit.
Sherman
|
323.2 | | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | | Fri May 22 1987 09:49 | 16 |
| Re .1, then what *do* you suggest single fathers (or divorced fathers
without custody who have the child for the day, etc.) of small female
children do? When thinking of some of the women's rooms I've been
in in malls, in the city, etc., I'd much rather have my small daughter
see a man going to the toilet (after all it is a natural act) than
have her sent in alone to a ladies room. Then, what if she doesn't
come out for a long time? What's the father supposed to do then?
What if there is a long line and the little girl doesn't have the
sense to make sure she gets her turn?
I really don't see this issue has a big deal only in the sense that
the more important than people's privacy while going to the toilet,
is that their small children be safe.
Lorna
|
323.3 | What are you hiding ? | STRIPA::PELLERIN | Where no man has gone before.. | Fri May 22 1987 10:27 | 22 |
| RE: .1 -< You better think twice.... >-
>Women do not have urinals. Women are always behind a door,
>unless the restroom has been vandalized, like the majority of
>mens rooms are. A little girl walking into a mens facility
>is going to see a lot more activity going on than a little
>boy in the ladies room. I am talking strictly about the "act"
>which takes place behind a closed door. I don't know that
>women may do other personal hygene matters beyond the door.
1. Just what is it about "the act" (oh no!!!!) that is so awful ??
2. What is the "a lot more" that a little girl is going to see that
she shouldn't know about anyway? Or are we ashamed of something?
If the child is old enough to ask questions, answer them. What have you
got to hide ? The *will* find out you know......
|
323.4 | | SUPER::HENDRICKS | Not another learning experience! | Fri May 22 1987 11:00 | 9 |
| Seems like it would be a big help for single parents of children
and preadolescents if public places had restrooms which opened directly
onto a corridor--the kid goes in to the single unit (toilet and
sink) while mom or dad stands at the door. Any problem, mom or
dad can walk right in. And there is no possibility of hassle from
strangers.
Funny, when I was growing up, lots of bathrooms *were* like that!
|
323.5 | just be glad there is a place to go....what if your outside... | BEING::MCANULTY | sitting here comfortably numb..... | Fri May 22 1987 11:21 | 9 |
|
If you're really worried about the little daughter seeing the
"natural act", then cover her eyes, when you go in.....
An "8" year old in the ladies room....peeping tom's start
out young now adays 8*).....
Mike
|
323.6 | making light of a serious subject | CREDIT::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Fri May 22 1987 11:21 | 6 |
| Tongue firmly in cheek --
Maybe those coed bathrooms that ERA opponents are so worried about
would solve this problem too!
--bonnie
|
323.7 | | GENRAL::BSTEWART | Who got me into this? | Fri May 22 1987 12:07 | 27 |
|
First off, I must say that an 8 yr. old should be able to go
to the bathroom in the men's room by himself.
Being a father of a 4 yr. old daughter, I have been faced with
this more than once. I usually take my daughter places with me
to give my wife a "break". I always take my daughter into the men's
room where I can keep an eye on her. I would *never* ask a women
to accompany my daughter in the ladies room because you do not know
who you can trust. Like someone stated in an earlier note, if I
send my daughter in, and it takes her a long time to come out, I
am not sure that I would have the "guts" to go in and make sure
she is alright. Although, she might just be playing in the sink!
Generally, if my daughter and I are out alone, and I have to use
the facility, I will wait. If she needs to go also, then I send
her into the stall, and go while she is behind "closed" doors.
I really don't think she notices that much of a difference in the
ladies and mens room, because I have been taking her in ever since
she has been born. I suppose that this will stop here shortly. Once
she is old enough to understand the dangers of other people, I guess
I will not worry so much.
What, did I say that??? A father saying he will not worry so
much about his little girl?
bill
|
323.8 | I've never had a problem | TLE::FAIMAN | Neil Faiman | Fri May 22 1987 15:11 | 13 |
| Re .1, Good grief! What sorts of things *do* people do in the
men's rooms that you frequent?
I've never had any qualms taking my daughter (now 5�) into a men's
room with me. She isn't going to see anything there that she
doesn't see at home. She will presumably reach an age eventually
where she becomes more of a "girl" and less of a "child", and
courtesy would dictate sparing the *other* men in the men's room
potential embarassment; I hope that by that time, she is old
enough to go into a women's room by herself.
As for peeking under the doors, it seems to me that that's
unacceptable whether the perpetrator is a boy or a girl.
|
323.9 | Answering fan mail :^ )... | BLITZN::AIKALA | Big Boys Naughty Toy: Lamborghini | Sat May 23 1987 05:16 | 37 |
|
Re: .2 What's wrong with getting a saleslady to escort the young
girl to the restroom? Sure, malls have some restrooms
located separately from the stores, but if going to the
trouble, why not seek out one of the major stores in the
mall that has it's own facilities? And besides, many of
smaller stores in malls have their very own single unit
restrooms located at the back of the store for their employees.
If child went in unescorted and is taking too long, what is wrong
with getting either then next person going in, the next
person coming out, grabbing anyone of corresponding sex
to assist you, and if worse comes to worse, knock on the
door and announce your coming in, just like the janitors
have to do before going into opposite gender, private
facilities? After all, the reason sounds valid to me.
Re: .3 I hardly think any of the adult males are going to be ashamed
in the presence of a little girl. Hardly. As for the act
itself, it's more the upbringing than the actual act. I
have seen some men swing right around without first replacing
what was brought out and...
Re: .8 (continued from above)...comparing strangers in a public
restroom, to familiar family members in a home environment
is poor contrast. If an 8 year old boy's curiosity will
actually cause him to look "under" a door, is a little
8 year old girl to be any less inquisitive? Taking from
.3 above, most men's stalls don't have doors. About
the only time a male might become uncomfortable is when
he is taking care of business #2 with an young girl in
sight. We're not talking about what is so wrong about
"the act" .3, we're talking morals. Yeah, go ahead and say
so what! But is the mental imagery pleasant for the child?
As for your question .8, on what sorts of things do people do
in the men's rooms "I" frequent, get with .2 and find out
why she would rather have her daughter see a man go to the
toilet rather than be sent in alone to a ladies room.
|
323.10 | not a viable solution | CREDIT::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Mon May 25 1987 09:49 | 9 |
| The "salesladies" (I will refrain from flaming you for that) have
enough work of their own to do without excorting a million young girls
to the restrooms! Do you want them to leave their counters unprotected
from shoplifters while they service people who aren't even customers?
Do you think they aren't already running their feet aching and swollen
trying to get all their own work done, so they have plenty of leisure
to take your daughter to the bathroom?
--bonnie
|
323.11 | | NSG008::MILLBRANDT | Think Feisty! | Mon May 25 1987 19:19 | 18 |
|
Gee whiz (:-)! What's all the fuss about natural processes done
with natural human parts?
If a child has been brought up in a home where bodily functions
are not treated as taboo or something to be done in top secrecy,
then the child is not likely to be upset by not-totally-dressed
people in a public restroom. I've seen many fathers walk their
little girls into men's rooms for the same reason that I took my
two boys into the women's room: they need supervision. They don't
know what to do when there's no paper or things are messy. They
learn thru meeting those situations when they're with you and seeing
how you handle it.
When are they old enough to go in by themselves? School age, 5
or 6, depending on the maturity of the child. About 10 if you're
in the Port Authority Bus Terminal!
- Dotsie
|
323.12 | On his own | STUBBI::B_REINKE | the fire and the rose are one | Mon May 25 1987 19:45 | 9 |
| When my oldest son was about six, he objected to my taking him
into the womens room to use the toilet. So I let him go alone
with the understanding that if anyone gave him any trouble he
was to tell me. He came out somewhat later and annouced to me
in a loud voice - that he had had no prolbem and - pointing - that
man over there was the only one in the bathroom with him...
naturally I wanted to crawl under the table and die!
Bonnie
|
323.13 | Sales"person" not applicable | DONNER::AIKALA | Dancing in the sheets | Thu May 28 1987 06:48 | 6 |
|
re: .10
Pardon me but...."salesladies" is what I did indeed mean to say.
I did not mean sales"person". We're not going to get a sales"man"
to take a little girl to the ladies room, are we now?
|
323.14 | what about sons? | CREDIT::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Thu May 28 1987 10:17 | 13 |
| What's wrong with "salesWOMEN"??? They aren't salesGENTLEMEN, now
are they? And I'll bet you wouldn't dream of asking a salesgentleman
to take your little boy to the bathroom, would you now? HIS work
is too important.
The point applies equally to taking a child of EITHER sex to the
bathroom generally reserved for use of members of the other sex. But I
presume from your repsonse that you are not overly concerned about the
safety of a young boy being sent alone to a men's bathroom in a public
place, though he's probably in considerably more danger of molestation
than a girl in a women's bathroom.
--bonnie
|
323.15 | Is it Monday or something? | PRANCR::AIKALA | Dancing in the sheets | Thu May 28 1987 11:07 | 19 |
|
Whoooooa! Just hold on a minute!
I never said anywhere, anything about sending a child in alone!
And who the @$%!!! said anything about HIS work being too important?
I would ask a saleslady, SALESWOMAN, to accompany my daughter to
the restroom if possible.
If I were a woman, I would ask the salesman, SALESGENTLEMAN, to
accompany my son to the restroom if possible.
And for whatever strange reason there was, yeah, I would ask a salesman
to accompany my son into the restroom.
All I am trying to do is illustrate an alternative, without getting
into a sexist debate.
|
323.16 | | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Thu May 28 1987 12:24 | 17 |
| I would not ask a sales clerk to take my child into the restroom
- that would be an improper imposition on them. I see no problem
taking my own child of either sex into the restroom until she or
he is of an age to go alone, and at that point I'd wait outside.
I believe that one can teach a child how to act properly in
such circumstances and can avoid problems. I certainly never
had a problem going into restrooms by myself when I was 5 or 6.
Admittedly, I haven't had a problem with this because I only have
a son, but I do have to keep him from peeking under the doors
at times.
I also agree that boys are probably more at risk than girls at
entering restrooms alone, but the risk is very low in either case.
Steve
|
323.18 | | SWSNOD::RPGDOC | Dennis (the Menace) Ahern 223-5882 | Thu May 28 1987 16:18 | 14 |
|
My kid just goes in his pants.
|
323.19 | | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | There's monsters out there | Fri May 29 1987 11:27 | 6 |
| Re .18, is that when you're at the movies?
You probably just don't want to miss the show!
The poor kid :)
Lorna
|
323.20 | some humor | VINO::EVANS | | Fri May 29 1987 13:19 | 29 |
| Since a note of levity has already been introduced here, I'll quote,
without permission, part of an article by Dave Barry. The whole
thing is on kids and travelling, but this section deals with the
subject of this note - and I don't think this would be much different
if the gender(s) were swapped around.
"The men's room was very small and had not been cleaned since the
Westward Expansion. Robert, seeing this, immediately announced that
the had to do Number Two, adn of course he insisted that I stand
guard right outside the stall. I hate this situation, because when
strangers come in to pee, there I am, apparently just hanging around
for fun in this tiny bathroom.
So to indicate that I'm actually there on official business, guarding
a stall, I feel obligated to keep a conversation with Robert, but
the only topic I can ever think of to talk about, under the
circumstances, is how the old Number Two is coming along. You'd
feel like a fool in that situaiton, talking about, say, Iran. So
I say: "How're you doing in there,Robert?" in a ludicrously interested
voice. And Robert says" "You just asked me that!" which is true.
And I say "Ha ha!" to reassure the peeing stranger that I am merely
engaging in parenthood and there is no cause for alarm."
Hope this wasn't too frivilous for the topic. But it's probably
jsut as well to remember that: 1)The task has to be accomplished,
so just DO it, and 2)keep a sense of humor about it.
Dawn
|
323.21 | Put your head in mom's booth | CADSE::GLIDEWELL | | Tue Jun 02 1987 22:21 | 31 |
| How old should a child be?
Take the child until she announces she is perfectly capable of
taking herself.
Also, what do you say if you're offended? (an eight year old sticking
his head under the booth!)
Why not say: *LITTLE BOY, GET OUT OF MY DRESSING ROOM*
Perhaps the parent will notice. Or, you can be really agressive and
walk into the parent's dressing room, swing OPEN her curtain,
and discuss the matter. (Or surprise her, peek under her
curtain and open the conversation.)
I think it is perfectly OK for any adult to enter the "other" washroom
IF YOU KNOCK FIRST, open the door slightly, and ask if you may enter.
I've been in this situation a few times -- with and without child --and
everyone has been more than cooperative.
Now for the rude question: If I enter a stall, and the person exiting
has left a soiled toilet seat, should I discuss the matter with her?
It seems to me that some people believe the best way to avoid
contact with possible bacteria is to p** all over the plumbing
fixtures. Or perhaps it is a way of proclaiming 'ownership' of the
place? But it reveals a real streak of pighood. I have never
*discussed* this with the previous occupant, but the day comes closer.
(The COOP has been threatening to close their public washrooms because
of the high ratio of pigs. Sigh)
Meigs
|
323.22 | A fix for the problem | YAZOO::B_REINKE | the fire and the rose are one | Wed Jun 03 1987 17:31 | 2 |
| Re the seat problem - why not write a note to the management suggesting
that they install seat cover dispensors?
|
323.23 | | SUPER::HENDRICKS | Not another learning experience! | Wed Jun 03 1987 20:57 | 15 |
| Lots of places in **Digital** have seat covers, but I have gotten
a most unwelcome wet surprise a number of times. Somehow I don't
think the general public is likely to do better than we do.
Possibly offensive material follows:
Wet (or otherwise gross) seats are very high on my list of peeves.
What's worse is that it's pretty hard to clean up adequately in
a public place when that happens. I was with a very carsick child
in a public restroom one day and she was amazed that I stood around
cleaning up the places where she "missed". She thought that was
"gross" and I explained to her that I thought it was *grosser* to
come into a restroom and find it filthy. Hope I made at least one
convert!
|
323.24 | look before you sit | GNUVAX::QUIRIY | Noter Dame | Thu Jun 04 1987 10:51 | 14 |
| Wet toilet seats make me crazy, too. Many times I don't
remember to look before I sit. I'm getting better, though.
(I used to get wild over pay toilets, but they seem to have
disappeared. At least, I haven't seen one in years.
Remember the ones that had seats that flipped up into a UV
(?) light recepticle?)
Anyway, toilet seat covers aren't necessary. When I was a kid,
my mother taught me to put strips of toilet tissue on the seat.
About three squares on either side does it. I don't think that
the people who piss on seats are likely to use the seat covers.
They're just inconsiderate idiots as far as I'm concerned.
CQ
|
323.25 | While porcelain woolies | CADSE::GLIDEWELL | | Fri Jun 05 1987 01:38 | 27 |
| >very carsick child
>in a public restroom one day and she was amazed that I stood around
>cleaning up the places where she "missed".
Holly, you are on my list for Citizen Of the Week award.
I suppose this child thought it was gross because she already had the
"white porcelean woolies" about washrooms. To leap all the
way back to note 1 of this topic, how do you maneuver kids into the
sane position -- between slob and squeamish?
It must be tough. E*very set of parents I know is very proud to have
worked both hard and consciously to teach their kids the facts of life,
hygene, modesty but not shame, et cetera, and yet the their kids ... now
20, 30, 40, 50 ... know their parents are kidding themselves.
My college roommate Gail amazed us. She occupied the sane point between
slob-squeamish, modest-sexy, chasity-boffing. She same from a home where
her parents would walk by in their underwear, where x could shower while y
used the toilet ... all of which struck me (hail mary, full of grace) as
unseemly (ok, radical).
I'd lay money, it's the hyper hygenic that are playing pigtime on the rest
of us. Perhaps because of them we should accompany the kids to the public
washrooms, until the kids understand something about hygene.
Thoughts from parents? Meigs
|
323.26 | I Got Them White Porcelain Wooly Blues | WEBSTR::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Fri Jun 05 1987 09:33 | 31 |
|
re: .25 -- you might be onto something here.
I, too, have cleaned public toilets after a carsick child has
demolished the area -- often . . . for about two years she couldn't
look at a car without getting sick! It got to where I carried a
washcloth and towel in my purse. First I washed her, then I cleaned up
the debris. The usual reaction from the other people in the washrooms
was "How can you let her do that in here?" I was never sure where they
wanted her to do it, but they couldn't seem to handle the sound. And my
cleaning up after her . . . And the ones who objected were always the
middle-aged types who looked like they probably had several carsick
kids of their own at one point in life.
I, too, come from a family where toilet privacy was somewhat less than
absolute. We didn't run around in our undies, but if someone was in the
shower we felt perfectly free to come in and use the toilet. Now that I
think about it, for most of my teenage years, the bathroom door didn't
have a latch on it. We put in a new door when I was about 14, and were
going to get a new doorknob for it, but we never got around to it. So
the door would shut but wouldn't latch. Might be something heavily
symbolic about that! :)
A number of Kathy's friends have commented unfavorably on the fact that
we leave the bathroom door wide open when nobody's in it. "But you can
see everything!" was the way one girl put it. "You have to leave it
shut so people don't look at it."
No comment.
--bonnie
|
323.27 | how educational... | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | | Fri Jun 05 1987 11:00 | 8 |
| re .26
oh gag! my lack of formal training in etiquette reveals itself
once again! i'd never heard before that you were supposed to keep
the bathroom door shut all the time! where do people LEARN these
things?
liz
|
323.28 | Wipe and Go | JUNIOR::TASSONE | Spring Fling | Fri Jun 05 1987 11:44 | 21 |
| As for wet seats, I learned my lesson. Now, each time I go into
a Digital bathroom, I check around (look very close at white seats),
take a whole handfull of toilet paper and wipe it down. If I go
to a public restroom, I don't even sit on the seat nor do I touch
it. I never know WHEN they were cleaned last and I am very careful
not to be "pigish", as someone put it. I look and if by chance
I splash or even the plumbing splashes, I'll wipe it away.
One time, I saw a seat completely covered with little yellow dots.
I chose another stall but then I saw a woman go in that stall and
immediately sit down. I was squeemish after that one. I mean,
how much in a hurry was she to "go"? Wonder if she felt anything
different after that. Uggggg!
As for kids, my sister NEVER let's her sons go into a rest room alone.
She has the sitter (or herself) check the men's room before allowing
her sons to go in. I guess she read somewhere that little boys
check in but they don't check out. She has irrational fears but
that's HER problem.
Cathy
|
323.29 | | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Fri Jun 05 1987 12:21 | 12 |
| I agree that messy toilets are gross, and there have been many
times that I've had to clean up the seat (and even flush the toilet
first!) before letting my son use it (or myself). When I am
with my son, I'll sometimes use a diaper wipe to clean the seat
(though since he is out of diapers, I don't carry those much anymore.)
I did see in a drug store a small aerosol can of disinfectant
cleaner specifically designed for cleaning toilet seats! It was
tiny enough to fit in a purse or pocket. I may pick one up the
next time I see it.
Steve
|
323.30 | ..and I always thought it was just a mens problem | CADSE::HARDING | | Fri Jun 05 1987 13:47 | 25 |
| When I was a kid a closed bathroom door ment someone was in there
and wanted their privacy, knock first. An open door ment free to
use.
Wet toilet seats.. I always thought that was just a mens room
problem. We learn something new every day. I asked my wife about
it and she made the comment "public rest rooms .. I never sit on
the seat.
Which brings me to a humerus incident.. pardon the tangent.
Last year on mothers day weekend my wife took her girl scout
troop camping in Pelem (bad spelling) N.H. as part of a area
wide girl scout campout. Now if any of you remember, the tempature
that week end was not very warm about 20 deg at night. Anyway
the out door johns (latrines) had stainless steel lids. At two
oclock in the morning she had to releave her self. She ran
to the latrine , dropped her pants and sat down.. Someone
had left the lid down. I am told that they heard her in
New York and she definately woke the whole camp.
Guess where my wife is going this weekend.
dave
|
323.31 | Keep it neat! | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Fri Jun 05 1987 13:51 | 6 |
| What bothers me the most is finding smelly dead cigarette butts
in the toilet - yuck! You'd think people could wait a minute or
too, since there is usually an ash try amounted on the wall outside
the stall, but they don't. I can flush the cancer-stick away, but
the odor lingers. I guess that is the only mess that really bothers
me, unless things are really pig-ish.
|
323.32 | | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | Chronicle of neglected truth | Fri Jun 05 1987 14:49 | 20 |
| This is gross but what I find the most disgusting in public restrooms
is when I find one where the previous user has had a bowel movement
and neglected to flush the toilet. Who are these people and what
are they thinking when they walk away from the toilet leaving it like
this? Do they really think some stranger's day is going
to be made why viewing this? After one such incident, a girlfriend
and I speculated that perhaps there is an organization made up of
people who make a hobby of deliberately going around and defiling
public restrooms :-).
As far as the privacy issue goes, I come from a family where you
left your bedroom fully dressed or in pajamas, robe and slippers,
and you locked the door when you went to the bathroom or took a
shower. I was raised that way. Nobody asked me before I was born,
and I have retained a lot of that desire for privacy. On the other
hand, I'm not going to go bezerk if an 8 yr. old boy peeks under
a door at me.
Lorna
|
323.33 | gross, gross, gross | WEBSTR::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Fri Jun 05 1987 15:24 | 16 |
| Maybe I should enter this under the note for "perversity of inanimate
objects" --
But a lot of times the toilet just decides not to work -- runs out of
water pressure or something, I suppose. Public restrooms don't usually
have plungers or other useful tools sitting around for your use, and a
lot of times (like the rest areas on I-84 S in Conn) there isn't even
anybody around to report it to. Besides, after it sits for ten minutes
or so it'll be ready to go.
Can't you just see the toilet bowl just sitting there, building up its
water pressure to spray all over the seat, snickering and chortling at
the annoyance it gives Bonnie and the shock it's going to give Lorna in
a minute or two . . .
--bonnie, ready to retire to the country
|
323.34 | She insisted she heard noises! | CADSE::GLIDEWELL | | Fri Jun 05 1987 21:59 | 26 |
| <.28
> As for kids, my sister NEVER let's her sons go into a rest room alone.
> ....I guess she read somewhere that little boys
> check in but they don't check out. She has irrational fears but
> that's HER problem.
An american anthropologist collects the kind of "folk tales" that are part
of a culture's oral tradition. Here's one that's been in the UStates and
PRico since the 30's. ... But she insisted she heard noises, and he got
mad and pulled out of lover's lane real fast, and when they got to her
house, an iron hook was hanging from her door. (Sigh, I've forgotten about
50 of these, but it's been a long time since my last pajama party.)
In 1964 I heard a dreadful story about a little boy who went to the men's
room alone. Heard it again in 65 and 67, and the story has made it into
the anthropologist's book too. ALL of his stores have in common that the
folk researchers can find no actual event that gave rise to the story ...
It's another TEXAS/razor/halloween/apple story that our grandchildren will
tell each other. I really wonder if sis heard the story.
Then again, I know a mom who kept the kids home from summer camp the day
that Skylab fell back to Earth. (And I know her! It's not my friend's
cousin's hairdresser's maid, but a real person!) Meigs
|
323.35 | | QUARK::LIONEL | We all live in a yellow subroutine | Sat Jun 06 1987 00:08 | 8 |
| Re: .34
You're referring to a series of three (so far) books by Jan Harold
Brunvand: "The Vanishing Hitchhiker", "The Choking Doberman",
and "The Mexican Pet". There's a discussion of these in
QUARK::HUMAN_RELATIONS. Wonderful reading.
Steve
|
323.36 | more off the topic :-) | ARGUS::CORWIN | I don't care if I AM a lemming | Mon Jun 08 1987 13:37 | 24 |
| re .26 and carsick kiddies in the rest rooms:
When I was one of them :-) I don't remember knowing far enough in advance for
my folks to get to the rest room in time! I remember numerous road-side stops,
though...
re .26 (again...) and bathroom etiquette:
> A number of Kathy's friends have commented unfavorably on the fact that
> we leave the bathroom door wide open when nobody's in it. "But you can
> see everything!" was the way one girl put it. "You have to leave it
> shut so people don't look at it."
I agree with a previous comment: If it's open, you know it's vacant! Also,
there are those who believe the lid belongs down when the seat's not in use.
That is the second most horrible surprise for someone running to the bathroom
in the middle of the night. One guess what the winner is? :-)
I have nightmares (many of them!) dealing with trying to find a rest room in a
public place, and then having all the stalls filthy/broken/etc. and I'm really
desperate!! This might stem from my really needing rest rooms often in a
hurry, and occasionally having a bad time of it...
Jill
|
323.37 | Bathroom rules at my house | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Mon Jun 08 1987 13:53 | 9 |
| You put the seat down and close the lid in the bathroom at my house
so that the cats won't drink out of (or fall into) the toilet!
You leave the door open when the "necessary room" is unoccupied
so that it is obvious that it is unoccupied.
You open the door when you take a shower so that the older cat,
who likes to be there (I spoil this cat) when the bathroom is full
or steam, can come in.
|
323.38 | lots of smart aleck responses :-) | ARGUS::CORWIN | I don't care if I AM a lemming | Mon Jun 08 1987 16:42 | 11 |
| re .35 (Steve)
I knew you'd be the next reply in there :-)
re .37 (Charlotte)
Well, I guess you have to make some adjustments for cats. And I suppose
keeping the seat cover down is better than leaving the seat up :-)
Jill, currently in the midst of "The Choking Doberman" :-)
|
323.39 | young children at highest risk for sexual abuse | PNEUMA::SULLIVAN | | Mon Jun 08 1987 17:21 | 10 |
| re .34,35, etc.,
I agree that there are a lot of "tall tales" out there about things
that happen to children, BUT the incidence of sexual abuse of children
is extremely high. Some researchers think as many as 1 in 4 of
all children may experience some sort of abuse. Of documented cases
of abuse more than 70% of the victims were UNDER 5 YEARS OF AGE!!!
In light of statistics like that, I can understand a parent's
reluctance to let her/his child go into a public bathroom alone.
|
323.40 | probably in their own bathroom, though | WEBSTR::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Tue Jun 09 1987 09:35 | 12 |
| re .39
It's comforting to think that all those children are being abused by
strangers in bathrooms, but unfortunately for our psychic comfort the
vast majority are being abused by people they know and trust --
parents, relatives, neighbors, their favorite teacher.
It's worth being aware of the dangers of public bathrooms and taking
a ride with a stranger, but let's not forget that strangers are
not the primary source of the danger.
--bonnie
|
323.41 | lid down, door open - now back to the topic... | QBUS::FINK | Time for a Dandelion Break!! | Tue Jun 09 1987 09:48 | 18 |
|
� < Note 323.36 by ARGUS::CORWIN "I don't care if I AM a lemming" >
� -< more off the topic :-) >-
� I agree with a previous comment: If it's open, you know it's vacant!
� Also, there are those who believe the lid belongs down when the seat's
� not in use.
When I was a kid, I was taught that the lid wouldn't be there
if there weren't a reason for it, hence we always left the lid
down. (when it wasn't being used, of course :-))
My current SO likes to leave the door closed when no-one's in
there. I agree with the vacancy issue, at least you know for
sure if someone's in there.
-Rich
|
323.42 | WASH YOUR HANDS AFTERWARDS | SAHQ::CARNELL | | Tue Jun 09 1987 10:11 | 7 |
| This is a little off the subject but why don't parents (some do
of course) teach their children to wash their hands afterwards.
This is really a pet peeve of mine. If we teach our children then
I don't have to watch adults who should know better. This really
says something about personal hygiene.
|
323.43 | washing hands | LEZAH::QUIRIY | Noter Dame | Tue Jun 09 1987 10:51 | 11 |
|
re:.42 What does it say about my personal hygiene? I don't always
wash my hands afterwards...
re: a few back. I have a cat who also loves to come and sit in
the bathroom while I take a shower. He will jiggle the doorknob
and complain if the door is kept closed. Sometimes he sits on the
edge of the tub between the inner and outer curtain. After I dry
off, I brush my teeth while he sits on the edge of the sink and
watches the water go down the drain.
|
323.44 | | SWSNOD::RPGDOC | Dennis (the Menace) Ahern 223-5882 | Tue Jun 09 1987 11:56 | 15 |
| RE: .42 "personal hygeine"
This reminds me of the three fellows who went fishing on a lake
in Maine. Two were city slickers who had graduated from Harvard,
the other was a local fella who had graduated from Bowdoin. At
one point they came ashore on a small island in the middle of the
lake, and, having consumed a few beers on this hot summer day,
each went off to one side to pee. When they were done, the two
Harvard men got out their ditty bags and produced soap and towels
with which to wash their hands. Turning to their guide, who was
using the time to fill his pipe, one of them said: "Why, I thought
you were an educated man. Didn't they teach you at Bowdoin to wash
your hands after going to the bathroom?". To which their guide
replied: "Nope. At Bowdoin they taught us not to go on our hands.".
|
323.45 | It only takes 2 seconds to do.... | JUNIOR::TASSONE | And it only gets better | Tue Jun 09 1987 11:59 | 22 |
| I was always taught to wash my hands after going to the bathroom.
I got into the habit and I've never stopped. When viewing Corporate
women in Stow who use the ladies room and pass right by the sink,
I feel that I wouldn't want to shake their hand when meeting them.
If you think about it, you eat with your hands and lick your fingers
sometimes: would you eat off a toilet bowl?
No judgement, just thoughts!!!
<in regards to my sister and her children, I asked her if I could
take my 9 and 8 year old nephews (along with my boyfriend) to the
Canobie Lake outing and she said no, it's too much for you to handle
and if you're not looking, someone might take them. Is this a genuine
fear of all parents of little children? I am 26 (was 25 at the
time) and am very responsible. I thought it was going a bit too
far. So, now, everytime I want to take them somewhere, I get a
warning list> If this warrants starting a separate topic, let me
know or point me to where this is appropriate.
Thanks Cathy
|
323.46 | pointers | STUBBI::B_REINKE | the fire and the rose are one | Tue Jun 09 1987 12:35 | 2 |
| re .45 Try note 217 "Fear and Children" 60 also deals with abductions
but I don't think it was what you were interested in.
|
323.47 | dry hands? | ULTRA::ZURKO | UI:Where the rubber meets the road | Tue Jun 09 1987 13:02 | 8 |
| re: washing hands after going (boy has this topic moved)
When I was having problems with dry, abused skin on my hands, my
dermatologist suggested that I might wash my hands too much (which,
of course, makes them dry out faster). He said it really isn't necessary
to wash your hands more than once or twice a day. I assume he doesn't
only go to the bathroom once or twice a day :-).
Mez
|
323.48 | Were you a Marine, Vern? | AMUN::CRITZ | Ya know what I mean, Vern | Tue Jun 09 1987 14:16 | 11 |
| RE: .44
Hey, that's not original to Maine. It had to originate
with the Marine Corps (where I learned it).
Sailor "Didn't they teach you Marines to wash after going?"
Marine "No, they taught us not to go on ourselves."
Scott USMC = Uncle Sam's Misguided Children (and some others
that I will not repeat, nor type)
|
323.49 | ad nauseum... | SUPER::HENDRICKS | Not another learning experience! | Tue Jun 09 1987 14:27 | 25 |
| There are times when I go to the bathroom and need to wash my hands,
and other times when I don't really *need* to, but usually do anyway.
(If I am preparing food, always!) It never occurred to me that
other adults were evaluating me on whether I washed my hands or
not! :-)
Next unseen for the easily grossed out...
---------------------
One thing that really bugs me (after doing a lot of travelling with
a carsick kid) is the shape of many toilet bowls. Some of very well
designed for children who need to be sick, and don't splash them.
I guess there is a kind of slope in the front so that they don't
have to aim for the deep water. Others drop straight down in front,
and cause much splashing. I wonder if "toilet bowl engineers" think
about things like that! I wonder if they ever consult with people
who deal a lot with the needs of children.
In rural areas I don't mind the "side of the road" routine, but in
heavily populated areas I always tried to get the kid to the bathroom,
with varying degrees of success!
Apologies for grossing anyone out...but I did warn you...
|
323.50 | | SWSNOD::RPGDOC | Dennis (the Menace) Ahern 223-5882 | Tue Jun 09 1987 16:06 | 13 |
| RE: .48 "Vernal jarhead"
No. I was a sailor.
|
323.51 | National Public Radio & washing | CADSE::GLIDEWELL | | Tue Jun 09 1987 19:46 | 31 |
| RE: washing hands
National Public Radio had a bit about hand washing in public johns.
Some curious soul (who would probably be fascinated by this topic)
hung about public washrooms and discovered that:
A person was unlikely to wash if no one else was present.
A person was most likely to wash in others were present.
I think the ratio was 80% to 40%, but my memory has been unreliable ever
since I worked with UNIX. So why?
Maybe we get .. ah ... casual in private. Or self-conscious in public,
which is not erroneious because people are watching. Or maybe we
unconsciously 'follow the leader': after all, if five peeps are present,
chances are at least one is washing, and the rest of us, as members of this
temporary community, just soap up.
Here's a new one: I just came from the ladies room and the white seat was
*covered* with white talcum powder (APO-ites - beware).
> No. I was a sailor.
Six of my brothers told me folks become *very* hygenic in the military
because the unhygenic are razzed unmercifully. Meigs
|
323.52 | Uh, on second thought, I'll hold | COMET::AIKALA | Penguins are cool. | Wed Jun 10 1987 09:45 | 6 |
| re: .49
In West Berlin, I had experience with the older european toilets.
There is no water in the bowl until you flush, so splashing
certainly isn't a problem. However, being able to deduce what
the person previous to you was involved in, is. Tidy Bowl a must.
|
323.53 | Didja take your shower today, Vern? | AMUN::CRITZ | Ya know what I mean, Vern | Wed Jun 10 1987 10:46 | 8 |
| RE: 323.51
Not only were the unclean razzed, sometimes they were
the main participants (not by choice) in the infamous
G.I. shower. Such showers vary with group and different
services, but all of them made the point very clearly.
Scott
|
323.55 | gag | VLNVAX::DMCLURE | Gear up for DECworld-87! | Fri Jun 12 1987 14:40 | 7 |
| re: -1,
That's really gross Bob. Remind me not to shake your hand.
-davo
p.s. At least not on the trail! ;^)
|
323.56 | | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | Chronicle of neglected truth | Fri Jun 12 1987 15:56 | 24 |
| Re .45, I think a lot of parents are paranoid about having their
children disapear because of all the recent publicity (those morbid
pictures on milk bottles, etc.) I'm glad there wasn't that much
talk about abducted children when my daughter was really small or
I would probably have chained her to me.
Re .42, washing hands. I have noticed some very attractive young
women at Digital leave the ladies room without washing their hands
after going to the bathroom. It does seem strange. My mother stressed
washing hands to the point that I would feel like I was commiting
a sin if I didn't. Even if I were alone in the restroom God and
my mother would know!
At *my* house we always left the lid closed. I got the general
impression from my mother that it was "not nice" to leave it open.
Now, I also don't want my kitties to fall in. We also always left
the door open when not in use. If the door was closed it meant
occupied. Rules of bathrooms are funny. One odd thing I've noticed
over the years is that wherever I live I seem to be the only person
who can really figure out how to put up a new roll of toilet paper
:).
Lorna
|
323.57 | remarkable | STUBBI::B_REINKE | the fire and the rose are one | Fri Jun 12 1987 16:30 | 2 |
| re .56 Gee Lorna I have the same problem with the toilet paper
roll in my house :-)
|
323.58 | Ann Landers says ... | CADSE::GLIDEWELL | | Fri Jun 12 1987 21:16 | 24 |
| re .56 by APEHUB::STHILAIRE
> odd thing I've noticed
> over the years is that wherever I live I seem to be the only person
> who can really figure out how to put up a new roll of toilet paper
Saw Ann Landers on TV a few years ago and she said of aaaaalllll the mail
sent to her during the column years, the two biggest mail getters were:
Which side the paper rolls down from, against the wall or opposite
the wall (opposite was Ann's choice)
Ironing bedsheets
The episode started with:
"Dear Ann, my husband is crazy; he wants me to iron the bed sheets!"
Ann replied 'good homemakers iron their sheets' and then received something
like 20,000 letters saying she was crazy. Next she had to recant; turns
out her housekeeper told Ann she hadn't ironed the sheets in 10 years.
The toilet paper letters clearly indicated that many of us are passionate
about the rolling direction. But seems some of us are more passionate
about making sure it's there. Meigs
|
323.59 | ;-) | SUPER::HENDRICKS | Not another learning experience! | Fri Jun 12 1987 21:21 | 6 |
| A friend of mine used to have an interesting standard for selecting
housemates. She would ask for references, and then ask the reference
if the potential housemate was known to replace the toilet paper
when it ran out without having to be asked.
She got some good housemates this way!
|
323.60 | | GCANYN::TATISTCHEFF | | Mon Jun 15 1987 14:41 | 6 |
| re. washing hands --
I was always told to wash BEFORE as one's hands are nearly the most
dirty parts of one's body (second only to the mouth).
Lee
|
323.61 | It was war! | CADSE::GLIDEWELL | | Mon Jun 15 1987 21:34 | 18 |
| re .59
>and then ask the reference if the potential housemate was known to
>replace the toilet paper when it ran out without having to be asked.
A genius!
I had to leave school and moved out of a happy aprtment with three
wonderful, much-beloved roomies. Three months later, when I came back to
visit, Each Person had a roll of tissue on her dresser and none in the
bathroom.
So when one had a guest use the facilites, she would first fetch the paper.
(The in-house war had arisen from money arguments. Bonnie ran up $150
phone bills, and while she would pay for individual calls, she was furious
that the others refused to split to $10-25 tax on ld calls. She *refused*
to understand the bill breakdown. And yes, she was the most monied of the
four.) Meigs
|