T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
291.1 | clarification???? | DEBIT::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Thu Apr 23 1987 12:02 | 6 |
| I'm not sure why you want to remake it? I could see wanting to tell
the same story in a different way, but I'm not sure why you'd want to
simply reuse the same script and everything, but just plugg in
different faces.
--bonnie, obviously missing something
|
291.2 | A comedy this time? | NETCOM::HANDEL | | Thu Apr 23 1987 12:06 | 5 |
| It would be fun to see a remake of this movie. I see Barbra Streisand
and (maybe) Jeremy Irons (can he sing? Probably no worse than Rex
Harrison) starring.
I could also see John Clouse (?) in that part as well. What a riot!
|
291.3 | | HARDY::HENDRICKS | | Thu Apr 23 1987 14:30 | 8 |
| Well, if you are interested in the prototype, check out Shaw's
Pygmalion.
I remember when Audrey Hepburn was chosen over Julie Andrews for
the screen version of the role which Andrews had made so famous...there
was quite an uproar among Andrews fans. (It's interesting to think
of films made while I was a teenager as classics, too!) I think
it may have actually been made around '63 or '64.
|
291.4 | an old motif in Western culture | DEBIT::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Thu Apr 23 1987 14:47 | 21 |
|
The Pygmalion legend -- of a man creating a perfect woman and having
her come to life -- goes back to the Greeks. Sometimes the man learns
he's better off with a real woman; sometimes the evil of woman leads to
his death; always he learns that the gifts of the gods are treacherous.
It's been the theme of probably hundreds of stories in various forms.
When I was in college, I read a scholarly analysis of the different
threads of the legend (might have been by Kate Millet???). The author
concluded that it's an attempt on the part of men to invent a mythical
woman who he can in fact control, rather than have a real woman
with a mind of her own.
I can't conclude that she was wrong, either.
The most recent retelling is the movie "Mannequin." It's about a man
who falls in love with a store-front mannequin, and she comes to life
whenever he's the only one around. I haven't seen it because the ads
make it look like the ultimate in men wanting an idealized beauty
with no brains or even heart.
--bonnie
|
291.5 | Sweet Revenge... | NAC::BENCE | That which we accept, we teach. | Thu Apr 23 1987 14:57 | 9 |
|
Re .3
When Julie Andrews accepted the Oscar for her role in
"Mary Poppins" she thanked the man who made it all possible
- the producer of "My Fair Lady".
{cathy}
|
291.6 | I could grow accustomed to her face | LIGHTN::MINOW | I need a vacation | Thu Apr 23 1987 15:15 | 2 |
| re: .0, how about Mick Jagger and Tina Turner
|
291.7 | | SOFTY::HEFFELFINGER | The valient Spaceman Spiff! | Thu Apr 23 1987 16:18 | 20 |
| Re: the casting suggestions of Jagger and Turner of Streisand
and Irons... I'll think I'll throw up now... (Just my opinion
you realize...)
re: Make it a comedy this time... Excuse me? I kinda sorta
thought it already was one.
Re: nothing in particular...
When Shaw wrote the play, he did NOT intend any romantic feelings
between Higgins and Doolittle. When the audience chose to read
them into the play, he was so furious that he went back and added
an Epilogue to the play in which Eliza marries Freddy Einsford-Hill.
This is one of my favorites. I see no reason for a remake.
Sometimes I think we get too caught up in "modernizing" and
"new-and-improving" things.
Just my knee jerl reactions,
tlh
|
291.8 | My Fair Lady | CSC32::JOHNS | God is real, unless declared integer | Thu Apr 23 1987 16:43 | 11 |
| I was just thinking about this yesterday!
I seem to remember (and I admit that this may be faulty) being angry
as a teenager at the way Prof Higgins regarded Ms. Doolittle.
I thought that he treated her solely as a *third* class citizen,
and even at the end (when he realized that he loved her) he did
not change the attitude that she was there for him, not that he
could be there for her (love, support, bring her tea, etc).
Didn't she even start picking up after him when he "allowed" her
to stay?
Carol
|
291.9 | how he's played makes a difference | SUPER::HENDRICKS | | Fri Apr 24 1987 10:22 | 9 |
| When we put this on in 8th grade (and it wasn't a bad performance
at all!) we decided to have Higgins become obviously more humanized
in the process. The way he was played, he thawed quite a bit, acted
a little sheepish about his behavior, and began to realize that
Eliza was a person, and not a thing. We didn't change the dialogue,
but had him convey these changes through mannerisms and gestures.
(Oh yes, we had to leave out the song "Show Me". Perhaps they didn't
think that we'd understand it at that age? ;-) )
|
291.10 | | SUPER::HENDRICKS | | Fri Apr 24 1987 10:23 | 4 |
| re .4
And for a horrific version of this legend,taken to extremes, try
"The Stepford Wives"...ugh...
|
291.11 | for comic effect | CREDIT::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Fri Apr 24 1987 10:53 | 10 |
| My husband and I were discussing this last night on the way home
from work.
We concluded that if you did want to remake My Fair Lady, the only
person you could possibly cast as Eliza is Bette Midler....
re: .10: I had forgotten "The Stepford Wives." Double Ugh.
--bonnie
|
291.12 | Peter O'Toole and ... | ULTRA::LARU | full russian inn | Fri Apr 24 1987 10:59 | 5 |
| I think they ARE remaking it, with Peter O'Toole. I don't remember
any details, but i think I saw it mentioned in a recent Sunday NY
Times.
Bruce
|
291.13 | Pygmalion, not My Fair Lady; onstage. | SUPER::KENAH | and shun the Furious Ballerinas. | Fri May 22 1987 17:58 | 4 |
| re -1: No, Peter O'Toole is co-starring with Amanda Plummer (I think)
in a revival of Shaw's Pygmalion.
andrew
|