[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | ARCHIVE-- Topics of Interest to Women, Volume 1 --ARCHIVE |
Notice: | V1 is closed. TURRIS::WOMANNOTES-V5 is open. |
Moderator: | REGENT::BROOMHEAD |
|
Created: | Thu Jan 30 1986 |
Last Modified: | Fri Jun 30 1995 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 873 |
Total number of notes: | 22329 |
267.0. "another old law to go?" by GOJIRA::PHILPOTT (Ian F. ('The Colonel') Philpott) Thu Apr 02 1987 11:05
Associated Press Thu 2-APR-1987 08:36 Cohabitation-Law
2-APR-87
State Senate to Vote on Repeal of Law Against Living Together
BOSTON (AP) - The future of a state law that dates back more than 200
years and outlaws unmarried couples from living together rests in the
Massachusetts Senate.
The state House of Representative repealed the 1784 cohabitation law on
Tuesday. The repeal's sponsor, State Rep. Marjorie Clapprood says she
expects the Senate to vote to repeal the law.
She suggested the repeal after Sharon selectmen cited the cohabitation
law as a reason for disciplining two police officers of the opposite
sex who were living together.
"This obviously, ludicrous, ancient, Neanderthal law still being on the
books was brought to my attention by the very embarrassing political
manuevers in the town ...," Ms. Clapprood said.
Officers Linda J. Farris, Sharon's first female police officer, and
Lawrence Phaneuf, 40, were told at a selectmen meeting in October that
they could be guilty of adultery and cohabitation because they lived
together.
"Overwhelmingly, people were outraged that the statute was raised 200
years later in Sharon," the representative said.
After a three-hour meeting, the board of selectmen determined the
officers could keep their jobs. The officers, who married in November,
agreed not to sue to the town for violation of civil rights or
discrimination.
"If we took all the offenders of this law in the state to court, we
wouldn't have enough room in the jails of the commonwealth to hold
them," Ms. Clapprood said.
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
267.1 | | MANTIS::PARE | | Thu Apr 02 1987 16:53 | 1 |
| stupid law anyway
|
267.2 | Virginia just as backward! | NEWVAX::BOBB | I brake for Wombats! | Fri Apr 03 1987 12:16 | 16 |
| Virginia is just as stupid! They recently upheld the law and
re-affirmed that it should be on the books!
There was a court case, I don't remember the specifics, but two
people (male/female) were denied an apartment on the grounds that
they were not married. They brought suit and lost, with the judge
stating that what they were doing was illegal and therefore a valid
reason for denial. There were additional statements about the sanctity
of marriage and other neanderthal comments, which I don't remember,
nor care too! There may have also been some comments about trying
to enforce the law, but I think that was made by both sides.
All I can say is that I am glad I don't live in Virginia (though
Maryland might have the same law....who knows!)
�
janet b.
|