T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
256.1 | Abortion Pill | CSC32::JOHNS | | Mon Mar 30 1987 17:24 | 9 |
| I am glad that women may have the opportunity for a quick and
relatively easy abortion in the future.
I have a terrible thought about it, though. I can only hope that
obtaining this pill is not easy, for I would hate to be the object
of a deranged man or woman who drops the pill in my drink while
I am pregnant. Is my fear unfounded that this might happen to someone?
Carol
|
256.2 | Not the solution | TOOK::LIZBICKI | | Mon Mar 30 1987 17:48 | 14 |
|
That is scary, Carol, and I didn't even think about it! This doesn't
sound like the type of stuff that would be available over the counter
though.
I also hope people will not use it as a solution; meaning forget
about preventing a pregnancy in the first place, just abort it if
it happens. Even if the effects are similar to a spontaneous
miscarriage, it doesn't seem like too many of them would be good
for you (possibly even lessen the chances of having a baby in
the future?) However, it does sound better than the abortions of
today.
|
256.3 | I agree | CADSYS::SULLIVAN | Karen - 225-4096 | Tue Mar 31 1987 10:53 | 16 |
|
> Even if the effects are similar to a spontaneous
> miscarriage, it doesn't seem like too many of them would be good
> for you (possibly even lessen the chances of having a baby in
> the future?)
By saying that the effects are similar to a spontaneous abortion,
they tend to minimize the danger involved. Spontaneous abortions
are not always like just having your menses. They can cause
hemorhaging, and can be fatal.
I whole-heartedly agree with you that this cannot replace birth
control. I also think that using this pill under a doctor's care
can be a lot safer than surgery.
...Karen
|
256.4 | | GOJIRA::PHILPOTT | Ian F. ('The Colonel') Philpott | Tue Mar 31 1987 11:08 | 33 |
|
I'm confused...
About three years ago there was a lot of publicity in european scientific
circles to clinical tests on a "morning after pill" in France. This was a
tablet that could be taken up to 48 hours after intercourse to prevent the
fertilised ovum from implanting itself in the womb. In effect this aborted
the pregnancy before it really started.
Is the French drug what we are talking about here the morning after pill
now released from the early clinical trials? or is it something different?
If the former I presume they discovered it to be efficacious (with
occasional hormone assistance) in chemically inducing abortion of
an implanted f�tus?
In view of the hype about the early announcement of the "MA" pill I
would have some moral concern (they were talking about it "completely
removing the worry of pregnancy" - you "don't need to worry about
forgetting to take the pill" or carrying other protectives, "if you
have sex unexpectedly, just take the MA pill the following morning and
you'll be alright")
Incidentally one potential use I do approve of: it was pointed out that
it would be useful to rape victims, who of course may very well not
have been taking contraceptive precautions.
/. Ian .\
(The quoted remarks are not of course direct quotes, but they are the
type of sentiments being expressed at the time).
|
256.5 | mine | GENRAL::FRASHER | An opinion for any occasion | Tue Mar 31 1987 15:05 | 32 |
| re .1
> I have a terrible thought about it, though. I can only hope that
> obtaining this pill is not easy, for I would hate to be the object
> of a deranged man or woman who drops the pill in my drink while
> I am pregnant. Is my fear unfounded that this might happen to someone?
This fear is about as unfounded as the fear of finding cyanide in
your Tylenol capsule. Given a chance, the crazies out there will
find something to do.
My biggest concern would be what would happen if the woman used
the pill after, say, 6 months. It *will* happen. Believe it.
I once knew a woman who used tampons. She didn't know you had to
take them out, so she just kept stuffing them in until she went
to the hospital for severe abdominal cramps. I never found out
where she thought they all went.
A friend of mine ate deep fried shrimp, tails and all, because he
didn't know the tails came off. Likewise, pinon nuts. Shell and
all. He commented on how much better they felt to his throat without
the shells. I sometimes wonder how much better the *other* end
felt.
And, for a little humor, a joke.
A woman, not wanting to get PG, asked her two lovers to wear condoms.
After 6 months, one brother turned to the other and said, "I don't
care if she gets PG or not, I'm taking off this damned rubber."
Invent anything and give explicit instructions and someone will
find a way to abuse it.
spence
|
256.6 | You shouldn't be pregnant for your own good | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | I haven't lost my mind - it's Backed-up on tape somewhere | Tue Mar 31 1987 20:26 | 22 |
| I don't believe that .1 was saying that she was concerned about
them being substituted for asprin in the grocery store with by a
Tylenol-murder-type crazy, but rather someone she thinks she knows
who for whatever reason doesn't think she should be pregnant (possibly
with a 'for her own good' reasoning) or doing it as a joke. I have
known several women who were in a high risk group for pregnancy,
or knew they were going to have a defective baby, but their morals
dictated that they continue the pregnancy. I have seen some of
these women put up with a lot of well-meaning friends, family, and
acquaintances telling them that they should abort. I can hypothesize
that one of this type of people might try to take things into their
own hands - taking the choice away from the woman involved. Another
possibly scary situation is if the husband/lover does not want her
to have the baby, and she does (after having got pregnant
accidentally), he could slip her one of these pills, and once again,
remove the woman's choice in the matter.
I also agree that these should be carefully regulated so that they
only get into the hands of the people who want to use them.
Elizabeth
|
256.7 | Abortion Pill | CSC32::JOHNS | | Wed Apr 01 1987 10:46 | 22 |
| Actually, Elizabeth, I had not thought of that, but I do believe
some SO's would be so devious as to do such a thing. In general,
I just don't like someone having that kind of nasty power over my
life and health.
When I was in high school, my mother was made Assistant Principal.
She was tough, but fair, but the previous AP had been very ill and
had not disciplined, so my mother's style was quite a shock to the
trouble students. It took them a year to get used to her (and love
her), and in the meantime they did everything possible to make *my*
life miserable. They punched me and tried to get me alone so that
they could beat me up (10 to 1 odds). It was discovered that there
was a plot to put LSD in my coke at lunch. I was very careful for
several weeks after this that I should never let my food out of
my sight, even for an instant.
The thought that some terrible person could purposely make me lose
a baby in such a simple way is a frightening one, and though I am
in favor of safe and healthy abortions (by choice) I do not like
the idea that someone could make that choice for you.
Carol
|
256.8 | yes, I know there are crazies out there, but... | KLAATU::THIBAULT | Swimmers Do It Wetter | Wed Apr 01 1987 11:55 | 7 |
| I gotta believe that if, and when, this pill becomes a reality it will
be hard to come by. Meaning it will only be given to a positively pregnant
woman and probably taken under supervision. I find it hard to believe that
it will become an over-the-counter drug and easily had by anyone who wants
it. But then again, stranger things have happened.
Bahama Mama
|