[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference turris::womannotes-v1

Title:ARCHIVE-- Topics of Interest to Women, Volume 1 --ARCHIVE
Notice:V1 is closed. TURRIS::WOMANNOTES-V5 is open.
Moderator:REGENT::BROOMHEAD
Created:Thu Jan 30 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 30 1995
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:873
Total number of notes:22329

255.0. "Advertising standards problem" by GOOGLY::KERRELL (clockwork noter) Fri Mar 27 1987 09:36

The following ad was placed in a conference I moderate:-

                               *** FOR SALE ***

                               VW POLO L, 1980

Burgundy, four very good tyres, recent engine tune, lady
owner, reliable car, long MOT, �1300. 

Is it sexist, if so what should I do as a moderator?

Dave.    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
255.1SSVAX::LAVOIEFri Mar 27 1987 10:1412
    
    
    Alot of people ask now when they buy a car if the owner was male
    of female because they consider a female to drive harder on a car
    than a man driver.
    
    Also they tend to take a little better TLC in some (not all cases)
    to their car.
    
    Not sexist just conclusionary on the part of the purchaser.
    
    Sunshine
255.2Opposite meaning?EDSVAX::PONDFri Mar 27 1987 10:3412
    RE:  .1 - I think the writer of the add has the opposite in mind.  
    The writer seems to be under the impression that women take better 
    care of their cars or perhaps drive less recklessly than men.  Hence, 
    a car owned by a "lady" presents some benefits.  Otherwise, why would 
    the writer mention it when trying to sell the car?
                                                     
    As to the nature of the add - whatever the present owner considers
    a positive feature of the car should be listed in the add.  Clearly,
    "lady owner" conveys an ambigious message.  Let the seller live
    with that.
    
                                            
255.4So what?GOOGLY::KERRELLclockwork noterWed Apr 01 1987 12:468
re .3:
    
>    This makes HOW many conferences you've posted this article in ?
    
Just this conference and Mennotes.
What's your problem?

Dave.
255.5Deja vu!GENRAL::FRASHERAn opinion for any occasionWed Apr 08 1987 00:027
    I forgot what conference I was in and assumed that all of the replies
    had gotten wiped out.  Awesome.  Strange is facter than fiction. %-)
                                                                    
    I'll repeat what I said over there, its such a minor point, I think
    it doesn't matter.
    
    Spence