T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
216.1 | fine | STUBBI::B_REINKE | the fire and the rose are one | Tue Feb 24 1987 22:31 | 2 |
| Martin, I think that was perfectly o.k.
|
216.2 | Three is Safe. One?... | NRLABS::TATISTCHEFF | | Tue Feb 24 1987 22:48 | 11 |
| I agree. Three women facing one man (particularly someone *jogging*
-- can a health nut [smile] be a rapist, too? Probably not) are
not going to be very afraid.
That's one of the reasons we like to travel in bunches.
It makes us (me) feel sooo much better to be reminded that there
are good, friendly people out there in the world. If you don't
drool, or leer, then you are less likely to scare me.
Lee
|
216.3 | p.s. | STUBBI::B_REINKE | the fire and the rose are one | Tue Feb 24 1987 22:50 | 1 |
| Besides Martin - you look reliable :-)
|
216.4 | | HOMBRE::HOWER | | Tue Feb 24 1987 23:30 | 7 |
| Another agreement that you already did the right thing -
especially by simply speaking THEN MOVING ON - staying in front
of them, not running along side or behind them. It's far more
worrying to women when it starts to feel like you're being
followed....
-hh
|
216.5 | no win | CACHE::MARSHALL | hunting the snark | Wed Feb 25 1987 08:47 | 21 |
| re .2:
I understood Martin to have said that each of the three women were
alone.
re .0:
I have often wondered when walking, as I overtake a lone woman, if
wild thoughts are racing through her head, and what I can do to
"radiate harmlessness".
I've come to the conclusion that there isn't anything I can do.
Whatever I do could create anxiety.
sigh,
/
( ___
) ///
/
|
216.6 | possible | STUBBI::B_REINKE | the fire and the rose are one | Wed Feb 25 1987 08:53 | 4 |
| re .5
I think you can "radiate harmlessness" by simply thinking that way.
It carries over into your body language and pheromones or what ever
(maybe even esp) and people do pick up on it.
|
216.7 | just being friendly | ULTRA::GUGEL | Simplicity is Elegance | Wed Feb 25 1987 09:00 | 7 |
| re base note:
I would not have felt anything wrong had I been one of the women
you said hello to. (I've been in such situation). I feel good at
friendly encounters such as this.
-Ellen
|
216.8 | On the other hand | MAY20::MINOW | Nihil carbohydrate carborundum | Wed Feb 25 1987 09:10 | 9 |
| Talked this over with a good friend who jogs the Charles a lot. She
disagreed, suggesting that I should have said "excuse me" or something
else innocuous. She did approve of my speeding up so as to pass the
women quickly (they *were* all alone), even though I was running at
about the same pace. (I can't wait for summer and Fresh Pond, where
most people know -- at least by sight -- the other runners.)
M.
|
216.9 | "good evening" = harmful? | ULTRA::GUGEL | Simplicity is Elegance | Wed Feb 25 1987 09:13 | 6 |
| re -1:
Didn't know "good evening" *wasn't* innocuous! Go with your instincts
in this case, Martin.
-Ellen
|
216.11 | | CSSE::CICCOLINI | | Wed Feb 25 1987 12:22 | 23 |
| Cute but there is some truth to displaying something like "Innocuous
Runner" though I wouldn't go that far!
If you're a stranger, then displaying something extremely descriptive,
(like your face for one, but clothing or something you carry works
too), helps me feel safe about a man. A stranger planning an attack
usually also plans to be hard to identify. This type of behavior is
what started the handshake. Two men would meet and graps each others'
right hands to display that they were not carrying a weapon! I
guess there weren't too many left-handed people then! :-)
But a man jogging past me with a full face and/or something else
very descriptive can either say "Good Evening" or just continue
on and I would be more likely to notice and then let it pass rather
than notice, go an alert, check my surroundings and keep watch.
Personally, I prefer no comments at all from strange men, but would
rather they simply ignore me and allow me to ignore them.
Of course with 'date rape' this is useless. You have PLENTY of
discriptive info about the guy but from some part of his warped
thinking, he just doesn't think you'll ever use it against him.
|
216.13 | Jogging rathole | MAY20::MINOW | Nihil carbohydrate carborundum | Wed Feb 25 1987 16:45 | 12 |
|
The Charles river is reasonably well-lit and fairly well-populated with
runners. On a cold Monday evening with a bitter wind howling, I passed
about 2-3 people running in my direction, and about 5-7 in the other
direction. Two women were jogging together, one was a mixed couple,
there were two guys together, and the rest were singles.
At Fresh Pond in the summer, there's a large gang that shows up around
5 pm. A few years ago, one of the women mentioned that she couldn't
get there early, and would we mind running at 7. So we all did.
If you're in the neighbourhood, feel free to drop by.
|
216.14 | | HBO::HENDRICKS | Holly | Thu Feb 26 1987 02:46 | 5 |
| When I used to walk/bike at Fresh Pond, and there weren't too many
people around, I appreciated it when lone men passed me as far away
from me as possible. If they approached and speeded up, and widened
the "horizontal distance" between us, it helped create a feeling
of space and safety.
|
216.15 | It a shame. | ANGORA::WOLOCH | Its Wolochowicz | Thu Feb 26 1987 09:51 | 17 |
| I prefer to jog after work. I just can't get out of bed THAT
early in the morning. I live in a quiet residential neighborhood.
So after work I put on my reflective vest and take to the streets.
But if its dark out and I see someone else jogging I will cross
the street. I also jog against traffic. It would be easy for some
one driving the same direction to pull up aside of me. I am always
very cautious and have a strategy that I would use if someone tried
to attack.
It is ironic that the times I have been harassed have been when
I jogged a different route or managed to crawl out of bed in the early
morning hours.
I don't want to give up jogging. Its helped me lose 15 pounds and
I feel alot better.
But I think its very unfortunate that I have to be so cautious and
so defensive in an activity that should be fun and enjoyable.
-Nancy
|
216.16 | | GOJIRA::PHILPOTT | Ian F. ('The Colonel') Philpott | Thu Feb 26 1987 14:45 | 9 |
| � I also jog against traffic.
You should do that for reasons of basic traffic sense anyway.
Walking, jogging or running with the traffic flow is very dangerous.
If you run against the traffic you can see oncoming traffic in time
to step onto the sidewalk, or at least out of the way of the
oncoming vehicle.
/. Ian .\
|
216.17 | Body Language | NATASH::BUTCHART | | Thu Aug 20 1987 17:38 | 44 |
| This reply is aimed at trying to help women in uncomfortable situations
ease their fear.
As a few in 214 pointed out, translating fear to anger can be very
empowering. When you can convey with your body language that you
will brook no nonense from anyone, when you convey that you wish
to be left in splendid isolation, that you are proud and angry instead
of afraid, you'll be left alone almost all the time. This tactic
has worked for me 100% of the time.
But what body language is involved? All I knew was that I tended
not to be accosted, jeered at or approached. I didn't have a clue
until the following incident. One day my husband, who was to pick
me up on a street corner in Cambridge, saw me, facing away from
him as he drove up, and for fun called out, "Hey, baby!" Even
as I recognized his voice my body performed its maneuver. What
he later described I did was: my shoulders stiffened and squared,
my back bacame ramrod straight, my chin lifted and my head snapped
decisively away from the sound of his voice. I read with interest
later in an ancient etiquette book that this move is an extreme
version of what was known as the Cut Direct. It was actually the
"socially correct" way to publicly snub someone you found
objectionable!
I have been with other women in public and seen what they did if
we received a catcall or an undesirable approach. And many of
them (not all--some were like me) did the following: The same
stiffening of the shoulders, the same aversion of the head, but
with spines suddenly folded, shoulders hunched, eyes focused on
the ground. I noticed too that if I felt a woman companion making
this move, that I tended to pivot after my Cut Direct and stare
hard at the offenders, as if I was trying to protect her. ("She
may look like fair game, but she's with ME, so back off.")
Maybe old-fashioned etiquette, which included how to handle unpleasant
situations with power and style, should be resurrected? [:-)]
(Let's see, where's my Emily Post?)
Seriously, this may be a move worth practicing. The straightening
of the spine and lift of the head is everything--it turns what could
look like a fearful move into something more powerful and decisive.
You are Someone To Be Reckoned With.
Marcia
|
216.19 | About taking a strong stand to defend yourself and another... | NEXUS::CONLON | | Fri Aug 21 1987 10:28 | 51 |
| When I was 17, I went to a "party" that was being given by a
male friend of mine. I went with a very naive female friend
and we were one of the first to arrive (it was after an evening
football game.)
As it turned out, the party grew very large, but the rest of the
people at the party were males. 99% of them were males that we did
not know.
We had been standing with the guy who was giving the party,
but he became drunk and it became obvious very quickly that we
were on our own.
My friend started to panic as some guys approached us and began
saying some rather obscene things (suggesting an alternate turn
of events involving us that would surely make the party more
interesting in their eyes.)
My friend was shaking like a leaf, so I stood in front of her
and I squared my shoulders and looked the main approacher right
dead in the eyes. I said, "We're leaving now" and I edged my
friend to the door (keeping myself between her and the others.)
I gave those people my worst "death eyes" (as Bob calls them)
and when they made some remarks speculating on what the two
of us might be like in the party they had in mind, I stopped
and told them in my finest controlled angry voice, "You can
guess about us all you like, because you're NEVER going to
find out."
We got out the door (with half the party following us), and
I said to my friend, "Walk to the car slowly. Don't run. We
are OK now."
We made it to the car and locked the doors. As we drove by
the entrance to the house, one of the guys had unzipped his
pants and was exposing himself to us. I turned on my high
beams and aimed straight at him (slowly.) He backed off and
we drove off.
I'm not sure what would have happened to us if I hadn't taken
such a strong posture against them. We were outnumbered by
20 to 1, at least!, and they had turned into a half-drunken mob.
As it is, I think we were lucky that posturing got us out of
there.
Some men really hate the fact that many women are prepared to
act this way towards men in public. Some men just don't realize
that "death eyes" can sometimes be crucial to our survival.
Suzanne... :-)
|
216.21 | Does this help a little, Bob? | NEXUS::CONLON | | Fri Aug 21 1987 20:41 | 37 |
| RE: .20
Bob, the women who give you "death eyes" on the boulevard
may have been instructed to do that in a Rape Prevention
Seminar. Walking around with an arrogant/assertive/border-
line_hostile attitude is a posturing technique that tells
potential rapists that a woman is less-likely to make a
fun victim.
The fact that *YOU* catch the kind of "rays" that don't give
you a tan is unfortunate, but it can't be helped.
Also, those women are not presuming that you are attracted to
them. Rape is not a sexual crime, but a violent one. That's
why you sometimes hear about 80 year old women (in orthopedic
shoes and hair nets) that get raped. It has nothing whatever
to do with a woman's attractiveness.
It's no more fun for women to have to worry about rape than
it is for a man to have to be treated as a potential rapist
by women that don't even know him. It's unfortunate all the
way around.
Let's not let ourselves get mad at the wrong people, though.
Just as we can't get mad at all men because we have to worry
about crimes against women, you should not be mad at us because
we have to necessarily treat you like a potential criminal on
the boulevard.
If your son David was offered candy on the street and told the
person "NO!" and departed rapidly, how would you feel if the
person turned out to be some nice person that you knew? Wouldn't you
still want David to keep saying "NO!" and decide that the nice
people that meant him no harm would just have to understand
why it is necessary for him to do that.
Suzanne... :-)
|
216.23 | The *truly* important women in your life don't use hate eyes... | NEXUS::CONLON | | Sat Aug 22 1987 00:11 | 11 |
| RE: .22
Well, Bob, it *is* possible to carry the recommended anti-rape
posturing too far...
Or maybe they just noticed *your* sigh of exasperation as they
passed...
:-) :-)
Suzanne... :-)
|