T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
214.1 | Fear | TIGEMS::SCHELBERG | | Tue Feb 24 1987 10:07 | 28 |
| I think I understand what you mean.....not the fear when you know
there is danger but the little voice that tells you to be "extra"
careful.........I'm always looking over my shoulder but I get nervous
when I go places alone like shopping and a guy tries to make
conversation with you.....that drives me nuts....I try to make sure
I loose him in a crowd go to my car jump in and lock the door.....I'm
sure some of them are perfectly harmless but I don't trust men....
When I was five a woman neighbor brought me and her kids up to our
neighborhood store which was only a quarter mile from our house
and some guy jumped out of the woods with a knife and grab her and
put the knife to her throat.....I ran like hell home! I hid under
my bed for the longest time and locked all the doors.....my mother
told me the neighbor decked the guy and held him for police. My
neighbor was called "Lucky" and I believe it suited her......when
I was seventeen a next door neighbor's brother attacked my father
and held him on the ground beating him up... (we lived in a small
NH town) my mother called the police but I remember going out with
my hairbrush and picking up this 300 pounder and throwing him on
the ground.....(don't ask me how) and when I started work at eighteen
I was hounded by married men to date them.....(sure....) so you
can see why I don't trust men....that's just part of it. Yes, I
am fearful of men......I do trust some men. I trust my husband
and he doesn't allow me to go alone anywhere if it's dark out.
He's just that way....he doesn't trust other men.
bs
|
214.2 | | ULTRA::ZURKO | Security is not pretty | Tue Feb 24 1987 10:10 | 23 |
| Yet again someone times a topic perfectly. There's a guy at work who's
just built a new house. He's offered a couple times to bring me along
when he stops by during lunch, to show me all the neat stuff he's doing.
I'm interested in house stuff, since I'm a new owner and don't have
alot of house savvy (sheltered childhood). But I probably won't ever
say yes, because there are just too many danger signals.
NOW PLEASE, any one or few of these do not automatically brand an
individual in my eyes as a raving rapist (why do I feel I need to insert
this disclaimer?). Probably the biggest signal is the "vibes". But some of
the more easily identifiable ones are: 1) he's friendly. That's why we get
along so well, but the quality of his friendliness has labeled him in the
eyes of another noter here as "too friendly". 2) He's older. Which means
the feminist movement and all that it has to say may be more foreign to
him. 3) He has a calendar of semi-clad hawaiin women in his cubicle
(remember the disclaimer; they all add up). 4) He jokes with me about being
feminist, about not growing and painting my nails, etc. Which has led to
some good conversations, but still makes me think.
Sometimes, I think this fear is ludicrous. But, the impact of the
trade-off, and my own trusting nature, lead me to be wary when I can
remember to be wary.
Mez
|
214.3 | | CSSE::CICCOLINI | | Tue Feb 24 1987 10:53 | 4 |
| Either Ann Landers or her sister said that they would rather fear
all men and be safe, than trust all men and take the, (not-so-small),
risk. I agree. Lest you men misinterpret the remark, replace the
word fear with the phrase "be wary of".
|
214.4 | Restrooms | GNUVAX::TUCKER | Peace of mind... | Tue Feb 24 1987 11:28 | 37 |
| Here's a very basic situation that men take for granted that just
occurred to me: going to the bathroom. From my earliest years,
I've learned to go to public restrooms "in a pack." (I've often
heard male comedians joke about this.) Especially on picnics in
public parks, and the like, women always seem to summon at least
one other woman to go along.
I can't count the times that I've been out with a group of people
where one person'll mention she has to go to the bathroom and there's
a chorus of me-toos and the whole female party will take that as
an opportunity to go. I notice this with older women especially.
I can't recall either of my grandmothers ever going to a public
restroom alone on any of our frequent family outings. And my mother
always asks if anyone else has to go (if she does).
Of course there are exceptions, for example, when there's alot of
traffic in the restrooms and there are lots of people all around.
Have you noticed how often public ladies' rooms are locked, including
in office buildings? (It can be a pain looking all over creation
for a key, too.) This reinforces restroom fears. It seems to me
that we needed keys to get into the DEC ladies' room when I worked
in downtown Syracuse 9 years ago.
I can think of 3 public restrooms in places I've frequented that
are located down flights of stairs, around a corner, and down some
hallway, that I just avoid altogether.
Probably related to this is the tremendous concern I've noticed
among men when it comes to a male child going to a public restroom
alone. When I've been out with friends and family, it seems that
care is always taken to escort male children under the age of about
8 or 9 to the restroom, almost as if they're entering a jungle, or
either some ominous black hole.
(I probably shouldn't have so maligned the jungle.)
|
214.5 | Little Things to Fear | CSC32::JOHNS | | Tue Feb 24 1987 11:51 | 17 |
| There are so many little things we do, that are habit now, so we
don't even think about them. Yesterday I was getting off the freeway
and had to stop at a light before I could turn left. There was
a man leaning against a pole in the middle of a small field on my
left. He was alone in a place most people don't walk, and he was
only a few feet from my car. I appeared to stare straight ahead,
but I was watching his every move, and would have been ready to
lock my doors in an instant. The only reason I did not lock them
right then was that I was afraid that would have motivated him into
an attack, and windows can be broken. I would not have thought
of it again if this topic had not come up.
Likewise, I check at night to make sure no one is in the back seat
of my car when I am getting in it to go home, and when I walk the
parking lot I am ever mindful of who is also in the lot.
Carol
|
214.6 | more on bathrooms | ARGUS::CORWIN | I don't care if I AM a lemming | Tue Feb 24 1987 15:29 | 11 |
| re .4 (and bathrooms)
A friend of mine was just telling me about a trip she took into Boston with
several young children. There were two young boys in the group (her son, age
around 8-9, and a slightly younger neighbor), and although the boys wanted to
go together to the men's room, she wouldn't hear of it. I can't blame her.
I wonder when they'll be considered too old to be "allowed" in the ladies' room
with their mothers.
Jill
|
214.7 | What about the others? | SZOFNA::MLONGO | | Tue Feb 24 1987 15:36 | 13 |
| I (as a male) would also like to hear from those women who do NOT
generally suffer from this fear. Otherwise reading this note is
apt to convey the feeling that ALL women suffer from this fear.
Based on conversations with many women (as a result of this note)
I have found that quite a few don't (at least not to the degree
of excluding common sense) suffer from these fears. Even I would
consider locking my car door in the situation described previously.
Another question I have (possibly another note?) is if women feel
that this fear attracts the attention of those people who they are
afraid of? People are good at hiding their emotions but fear is
a very difficult one to hide!
...Martin
|
214.8 | restrooms | 38858::BUSDIECKER | | Tue Feb 24 1987 15:37 | 9 |
| Re: .4 and bathrooms
I have a friend who was badly beaten in a bar bathroom while my roommate was
waiting just outside. Apparently no one noticed this guy going into the
women's restroom with a pool cue. In most situations, I am less cautious
than I probably should be, but ... I pay more attention now.
I still have trouble believing that no one noticed him going in, including
her friend.
|
214.9 | Correction | CSSE::CICCOLINI | | Tue Feb 24 1987 17:01 | 28 |
| ...and this is an important point, Martin.
Women do not "suffer" from this fear. Women can "suffer" if they DON'T
have this fear. Please keep in mind my definition of the word fear.
You are confusing your reactions to fear here and assuming that
women must then live in self-imposed prisons and are ever-suspicious
and afraid and that's not true. We are fearful - not frightened.
The difference is between a chronic, underlying thought, (the fear
I'm talking about), and an acute reactionary state, (the fear I
think you are talking about). We are not always on suddent alert - we
are not always "frightened". We ARE always AWARE of the potential for
danger and are always ALERT because of it. Our "resting state",
if you will, is most always less relaxed than man's "resting state".
The acute reactionary state of being frightened is of course hard
to hide, but we're not talking about this state so there is no reason
to assume that women's "fear" attracts people's unwanted attention.
I'm not discussing neuroses or phobias, (what's the fear-of-people
phobia? I'll have to check my psych book tonite!), but rather
the necessary everyday wariness that limits women's everyday freedom.
Like the woman watching the man leaning against the pole. She hid her
wariness, (her fear), well by not staring at him, knowing that "dis-
playing fear" could indeed provoke. No, the average woman is wary AND
is cool about it.
I think it's necessary to clarify this.
|
214.10 | Awareness | NRLABS::TATISTCHEFF | | Tue Feb 24 1987 22:25 | 14 |
| re -.1
Hear, hear!
Since my, er, "incident," yes I now feel that overwhelming fear
in a few situations (I don't think that's a suprising reaction...).
Before, I simply ran on "autopilot awareness"; without noticing
it, I kept track of situations and would go into defense/fear mode
only if triggered. That sort of autopilot usually works quite well.
Well, _usually_...
Lee
|
214.11 | checking out | STUBBI::B_REINKE | the fire and the rose are one | Tue Feb 24 1987 22:41 | 6 |
| I think most women learn at a very early age to run on "auto pilot".
Every time we meet a new man he gets run through a check list
and classified as ok, not ok or questionable. Most all men get
classified as ok, but we still have to make that decision at
some level of our consciousness.
Bonnie
|
214.12 | Things that set me into "scared/angry" mode | NRLABS::TATISTCHEFF | | Tue Feb 24 1987 23:20 | 42 |
| 1. Someone talking about how great sex is. (Friend or not. Scares
me silly. A funny/dirty joke can be funny but scary, too. Dunno
why.)
2. Looking at my body instead of my face/eyes when we are talking.
3. Reminding me (in subtle ways, and no, I can't define them) that
I am a woman and you are a man. We both know that, and I still
prefer to get to know others on a person-person basis before delving
into woman-man.
-<Scary Situations>-
I took a cab from Logan to Cambridge and my cabbie was a really
nice student. We were talking a little (small talk), and geez,
he was a nice guy. When helping me out of the car, he said something
like, "I know you don't know me or anything, but would you like
to go out and hear some jazz together sometime?"
That hurt. If he had been a woman, I would have leapt at the
opportunity. But him being a man...he seemed so neat (musician),
but you just _can't_ do that!! If it had been the country (or a
smaller town), I still would have had to say no. One potential
neat acquaintance lost.
When I had to travel through NYC carrying a lot of bags in rush
hour, they just got too heavy, and then I got lost. I stopped and
asked a woman how to find a certain place. She told me and walked
on. A man in a business suit walked by and offered to help me with
my bags. I said no (WHO is going to run off and steal a bag I can
barely carry?!). Then a wonderful (the goddess...) woman dressed
similarly stopped, and I let her carry one for me, thanking her
profusely all the way. When the man offered, I practically cried
because I wanted so much to get some help, but I was afraid. Sad,
isn't it?
Neither of these men did anything in my "fear" list. They were
being nice, kind, good people. And if they had turned around and
done something bad to me, the "defense attorneys" (police, etc)
would make it out to be my own fault.
Lee
|
214.13 | Happy Valentines Day :-( | CADSYS::SULLIVAN | Karen - 225-4096 | Wed Feb 25 1987 08:45 | 31 |
| The other day I got an anonymous valentines day card at work.
This really didn't bother me very much, but I knew it wasn't from
my husband, and it wasn't from a male friend that I'm close to.
So who was it from? What was the motivation behind it? It was
probably just a friend who is trying to cheer my day, but what
if they want more than friendship from a relationship? Why should
I have to worry about it?
Then when I got home, there was an obscene phone call on my
answering machine. I was home alone and listening to a message:
"Karen, what color panties do you have on today? I want to see
you bend over and watch your little ass." Look, two weeks ago,
and I can quote it verbatim. I was scared. This person knew
my name, they knew my phone number, they probably know my address
(if not, it's in the phone book). Later I reasoned that it was
probably just a random obscene phone call, and they only knew
my name becuase the message on the machine said "you have reached
Tom and Karen Sullivan's house...". And it was probably totally
unrelated to my anonymous valentine's day card.
Well, when I told Tom about it, his first reaction was amusement.
He, of course, started with the random phone call theory, where I
started with the personal attack theory. I made Tom change the
message on the machine so that our names were not mentioned. But
I had to explain my fear to him, and a little part of me is still
afraid, becuase I don't really *know* who it was and if he knows
me. And I'm mad, becuase some men think it's funny to call women
up like that. And men probably don't have to worry about receiving
calls like that.
..Karen
|
214.14 | "They feel safe here..." | HPSCAD::WALL | I see the middle kingdom... | Wed Feb 25 1987 08:54 | 21 |
|
I guess I have trouble following some of this because I'm a slightly
larger than average male who's lived in cities all his life. I
would have called a lot of these feelings survival instincts. Then
again, as usual, what the hell do I know.
These days I live in Worcester, and while it's not New York or Boston,
you still have to keep your wits about you. I can remember when
I first started school, all the resident advisors giving us a speech
akin to "don't let the female students walk home alone in the dark."
All the city guys got it right away. Some of the others had to
have it explained.
My parents were somewhat surprised to hear about the assortment
of people that sometimes wind up sleeping on the flat surfaces in
my apartment. The explanation was simple. They felt safe. If
someone's willing to fall asleep under your roof, they trust you.
I know the whole world isn't going to change because of my example,
but I'm doing what I can, you know?
DFW
|
214.15 | telephone harassment | ULTRA::GUGEL | Simplicity is Elegance | Wed Feb 25 1987 09:07 | 7 |
| re .13:
It'd be interesting to know how many women out there have not received
telephone calls like this at some time in your life. I'll bet it's
real close to zero percent.
-Ellen
|
214.16 | | SWSNOD::RPGDOC | Dennis (the Menace) Ahern 223-5882 | Wed Feb 25 1987 09:16 | 24 |
| RE: .4 paPck
It never occurred to me that there is a commonsense reason for women
to go to public restrooms in pairs. Now that you've mentioned it,
it's obvious.
Shortly after we became engaged, my wife was attacked in a rest
room in a church. We were at a dance upstairs and she went down
to the street level to the ladies room, the entrance to which was
visible through a door to the outside. A man in a ski mask followed
her in and grabbed her from behind in the stall, telling her he
had a knife and she better do what he said. She not only screamed
bloody murder, but she hauled off and belted him one. He ran out
the door. Three divinity students meeting in an adjacent room heard
the commotion and chased the guy out to the street. When I found
out what had happened I ran across the street to the police station
to tell them. They said she had to come in and fill out a report
before they could do anything. I told them the guy was running
down the street with three men in hot pursuit. They said she had
to come in and fill out a report before they could do anything!
In the following months the news reported on several women in the
area being raped by a man in a ski mask. He was never caught.
|
214.17 | A different reaction.. | CSSE::HIGGINS | | Wed Feb 25 1987 09:50 | 35 |
|
I once had a very disgusting pictures torn from a magazine
sent to me. They showed a woman with two men performing different
'activities'. The person that sent this to me had wrote my
name next to the woman and wrote some real disgusting remarks
all around the picture. This really scared me. I had just
moved into a new town and not many people knew or could find
out my address. I was very shook up by this.
This, like obscene phone calls, invoke a sort of temporary fear
in me that someone is watching me. After receiving the pictures
and phone calls (at different times) I tend to be a bit more
cautious, or on guard if you will.
But I find there is another type of fear, and I don't know if
I should include this in this topic or not but here goes.
Once a man broke into my house and I was home alone (I don't
really know why I am putting this in, but I am wondering if
anyone else has ever reacted in this way). I was in bed and
I was positive that someone had broken in. I completely froze.
I opened my mouth and I could actually hear and feel my heart
beating. I just couldn't move. I was almost wishing that I
was dreaming and that this wasn't real. He was right at the
foot of my bed and I was so afraid to move. I thought that
he would think I was asleep. Lucky for me he did think that
(I assume). Then I heard my dog walking upstairs (my room
was in the basement where the man broke in). I guess the
man heard him as well and he left.
Has anyone else ever reacted like this? I feel kind of stupid
now that I completely froze. I was lucky that I did though,
but it was so strange. Thank God for Marco (my dog).
Carol.
|
214.18 | husbands and boyfriends | 38858::BUSDIECKER | | Wed Feb 25 1987 10:12 | 12 |
| Just read in U.S. News and World Report --
1/3 of the 4500 women who are murdered each year are killed by their
husbands or boyfriends. (They were also mentioning that police are getting
more involved in domestic violence because violators who are jailed are 50%
less likely to repeat the performance within the next six months. US N.&W.R.
said they hope this will save some lives.)
[This may have been mentioned before, but it serves as a reminder why we
have to be careful, maybe even of people who we normally view as "safe". How
many of the violators were first time offenders? Hopefully a small
percentage ... I do like trust ... I also like life.]
|
214.19 | | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | | Wed Feb 25 1987 10:36 | 36 |
| Re .4, the restrooms. One public restroom that I hate to have to
go to alone is the one in the basement level of the Worcester Galleria
shopping mall. (It's also one of the filthiest I've seen in years.)
The other night I was shopping there alone and had to go to the
restroom. The basement level of the mall was deserted except for
a group of 4 or 5 tough looking teenage girls hanging around. I
was almost afraid to go in with *them* there. I thought if they
wanted to, they could overpower me, take my purse, beat me up and
nobody would even know. I walked past them, with my nose in the
air, and went into the restroom and they didn't bother me. But,
if they had been guys I wouldn't have risked it.
Re .14, speaking of Worcester, it is a small city, but nobody could
pay me to walk in the South Main area alone day or night. (More
than one woman has been raped and/or murdered there in recent years.)
Re .7, my initial reaction to reading this topic and the one on
date rape was that, I've never felt this afraid. But, then I realized
that I have always felt this afraid, but that I just take it so
for granted that I feel this way, that I just accept it as normal
until it's brought out for discussion.
Re Mez, if you have any doubts about this guy asking you to go to
his new house at lunch (and you aren't "interested" in him) either
bring it up for discussion or don't go. I mentioned something similar
happening to me in the date rape note. The guy just took it for
granted that that's why I went to his new townhouse with him at
lunch even though it have never been mentioned. He asked me if
I wanted to see the new place and I said yes - pretty straightforward
I thought. He didn't rape me or get rough with me when he found
out I wasn't interested. He seemed to accept my refusal in good
humor, but every once in awhile he would tease me and call me a
"Little prick tease!" Cute, huh?
Lorna
|
214.20 | YES! | CSSE::CICCOLINI | | Wed Feb 25 1987 12:05 | 33 |
| re: -1
>my initial reaction to reading this topic and the one on date rape
was that I've never felt this afraid. But then I relized that I
have always felt this afraid, but that I just take it so for granted
that I feel this way, that I just accept it as normal until it's
brought out for discussion.
That is perfect. That is what men don't understand about women's
fear. We are not trembling wimps. Quite the contrary. We are
strong enough to have built wariness into our characters so that
it becomes part of us and we don't really have to think constantly
about our safety and the potential for danger and we can continue
to lead a relatively normal life. Because we've ingrained fear
so much into what is "normal life" for us, men don't see the fear
and indeed think of fear as it occurs in men's lives which is mostly
ONLY the acute reaction - the beating heart, the sweating, the
sharpening of the senses and it's not. Men think of fear as pretty
much debilitating to normal life, (and acute, constant fear certainly
IS), and probably think, "if women are so afraid how do they ever
leave their homes?!" How indeed. With much care. With much caution.
Sometimes with much trepidation. Sometimes with no fear at all
but with refreshing bravado! But that's usually just a mood!
That's why I like the alone-in-the-NY-subway-at-3:am analogy. There
is no trembling or sweating going on but the potential for danger
causes an underlying FEAR and behavior will be modified because
of this potential.
Women's lives contain that ame potential always, and as a result we
feel that same underlying fear always and we modify our behavior because
of that potential and one step further, we just plain have to get
used to it.
|
214.21 | Personalized obscenities | PASCAL::BAZEMORE | Barbara b. | Wed Feb 25 1987 12:36 | 21 |
| Personalized obscene calls are the worst. When I was in high school
a guy called at 7:45 am and asked my mother if he could talk to
me (by name). He then went into an obscene monolog about my clothes
and what not, so I hung up and then dialed the police. The dispatcher
put me on the line with the only policewoman our small town had.
She asked me if I knew who it was, I told her the voice was familiar,
definitely one of the guys I went to school with, but I couldn't
place it. Apparently quite a few girls from my high school were
getting these calls. I don't know if the guy was ever caught.
I know that all of my close girl friends over the years have gotten
obscene phone calls. One of my friends got repeated calls from one guy
who had seen her picture in the paper. One day she got a call from him,
then blew her trombone into the phone as loud as she could, which was
quite loud enough. I don't think he ever called after that.
The random obscene phone calls I forget about fairly quickly, the
personalized ones I spend the next couple of weeks listening to
every guy I meet trying to determine if he owns -that- voice.
Barbara b.
|
214.22 | Phone Calls | SZOFNA::MLONGO | | Wed Feb 25 1987 12:59 | 8 |
| Re: .13
There was a very interesting television special the other evening.
The gist of the documentary was that interestingly enough a larger
percentage of "hang-ups", "prank calls" etc... originate from females
rather than males! Interesting, huh?
...Martin
|
214.23 | more phone calls | YAZOO::B_REINKE | the fire and the rose are one | Wed Feb 25 1987 13:25 | 12 |
| re. phone calls
I got an obscene call from an in plant number one day while just
sitting at my desk. He called me by name, and like .21 I listened
to the voices of the men I knew for a while afterwards to see if
I recognized the voice. Plant security told me that a lot of women
had been complaining about these calls and they were pretty sure
of who he was. That was quite a while ago.
As to prank calls - the most common originators to my knowlege are
pre adolescant and early adolescant girls. Not to excuse their behavior
but I really don't think they can be compaired to obscene callers.
|
214.24 | What are you doing about it ? | STING::BARBER | | Wed Feb 25 1987 14:11 | 39 |
| First off let me state that Iam a man, and this is a reflection
of my thoughts on the subject and the responses to it.
Ive gone through all of the replys to this subject and detected
two camps of people. The first are the ones that live in a constant
state of awareness and the others in a constant state of fear.
What I haven't seen (surprisingly enough) is what you ladies are
doing about it. Have any of you gone to self defense courses or
learned to use a defensive device such as a kublaton ?? Have any
gotten to the point where you carry a gun with you ??
Reading through this brought back some things that I wasent aware
of until I was told by some female co-workers a few years ago.
In fact I put a note in MENNOTES about it under the title of
"Bad habits from bad times". What it refers to is my unconscience
habit of looking a person up and down when I see them or am talking
to them. It came from the background of things I was involved in
for a number of years. What I now realize is that that has a tendency
to make people (especially women) very uneasy and uncomfortable in
my presence. I have since tried to curtail it as much as possible
in the presence of women.
Having an heightened awareness about you is a good thing. It equates
to what is commonly called street smarts by a lot of people. What
I find disturbing is when it begins to take over ones entire life
to the point of not trusting anyone thats a male. If you have reached
that point(and I sense that some of the responders have) I would
strongly urge you to seek some self defense help to regain some
confidence and overcome the fear.
The reason I say this is that, having dealt with some of societys
more unsavory people they know who is easy pickings vs the ones
that arnt. In essence they sense the fear in people vs the ones
that arnt intimidated and will go after the ones in fear every time
they seek a victim. If any of you out there desire to go this route
then either find a source that your aware of or contact me for some
references.
Bob B
|
214.26 | Violence vs Violence? | TIGEMS::SCHELBERG | | Wed Feb 25 1987 14:40 | 13 |
| RE: 24
I think education is more important than self-defense....let's educate
our justice system! If more of these guys were put away we wouldn't
live in fear. If more justice systems BELIEVE us.....we wouldn't
feel this way. carrying a gun is no answer......how many people
shoot someone is self defense and still GO ON TRIAL????? Also you
have to live with your actions as well.
I don't live in fear but I AM careful......I think that is what
everyone is trying to say.
|
214.27 | | AKOV04::WILLIAMS | | Wed Feb 25 1987 15:01 | 9 |
| Thank you, all the women who have talked openly and honestly
in this note and the Rape Date note. You have awakened me to a
reality of which I was not at all aware. About four years ago a
female friend from work and I went to a play. Walking back to our
cars, I noticed she was 'very uptight' and have always wondered
why. Yes, I asked her. She did not offer an explanation. And
now I know!
Douglas
|
214.28 | Thanks for your thoughts... | ARGUS::CORWIN | I don't care if I AM a lemming | Wed Feb 25 1987 15:07 | 25 |
| re .16 and the police's attitude of "she'll have to come in and write a report":
And I bet if a cruiser spotted a man running down the street shooting a gun with
one hand and carrying the stolen goods in the other, they'd say "well, let's
call the station and see if anyone reported a robbery".
re obscene phone calls:
I've had my share, but don't recall any being personalized. I've had some
repeats, too, and found that if you don't have a trombone handy, or a male voice
handy (to say "hello" into the phone) lay the receiver down for a little while
and it will bore the hell out of the caller. I've heard that hanging up
doesn't do as good a job.
re Lorna and the Worcester Galleria restrooms:
I had the rare opportunity of forcing some "tough kids" to leave because *they*
were uncomfortable. You know how small that room is? You know how your innards
sometimes act up on you when you're really nervous? :-)
Reading this note has given me a lot to think about (ditto for the date rape
note). I've been incredibly naive, and incredibly lucky. I've also been
able to understand some of my feelings and reactions better. Thank you all.
Jill
|
214.29 | fighting mad... | TOOTER::GARY | inclined to wear bedroom slippers... | Wed Feb 25 1987 15:09 | 30 |
| re: .24
I agree. I don't understand why more woman don't run not walk to
their nearest martial arts school.
I have been taking karate lessons for about 4 months now and I
have come away with two realizations. One, I understand just
how much more powerful than I a 180 pound six foot man is. (I
practice with them three times week :-)), and two that despite
this difference in size a black belt is well able to disable
any untrained attacker. A trained attacker, well, given the element
of surprise (How many men would expect there chosen victim to attack
them) I still believe the woman could disable her attacker.
re: .25
>No flames intended here ... Just wondering if self-defense
>training doesn't just intensify the existing fearful feelings!
No, quite the contrary. I now know that I have some trained reactions
to an attack situation (not many yet, but some). It's like knowing what
to do if my car skids on ice, or a tire blows at high speed. Instead of
panic I think, pump the brakes, steer into the skid, ect. Instead of panic
respond with a block, and a strike.
By the time I become a black belt (assuming I make it that far). I
expect to be able to give any b*st*rd that attacks me the response
such an attack deserves.
|
214.30 | only part of the solution | YAZOO::B_REINKE | the fire and the rose are one | Wed Feb 25 1987 15:20 | 11 |
| Lisa Silwa the head (I believe) of the guardian angels has
a black belt in karate. I remember reading an article about
how she was cornered and almost raped by five guys inspite
of this. So self defense courses are not a panacea. Also
I'm not sure if they would do much for the feelings of
hesitancy most women have about meeting new men - until they
are able to determine if the guy is a potential friend/harmless
aquantance, or a jerk. Remember what we are talking about here
is a much more subtile thing than being afraid of a physical
danger. Dealing with the self defense side of it is only one
facet.
|
214.31 | for what its worth | STING::BARBER | | Wed Feb 25 1987 15:33 | 27 |
| RE . 25 , .26
The point Ive tried to make here is not to become the aggressor,
no one in their right mind goes out looking for trouble.
But to replace the fear with a positive attitude. One that goes
along the line of when in a possible bad situation of " Iam not
going to contend with any crap from you". Multiple studies have
shown that when a person is out to mug another that they will
avoid those with a positive attitude and prey on someone they can
place into fear because they are much more easier to deal with.
Being ignorant and naive will only get you into trouble also.
I am only stateing my personal opinion baised on experence that
fear replaced with a positive attitude is one of your best defensives
against becoming a victim.
True, the justice system has its fair share of problems, but in
too many cases the attack,mugging or rape goes unreported because
of multiple reasons. I realize its not easy for any woman to go
through all the crap associated to reporting and prosecuting her
attacker, But sadly there is no other way to get these creeps off
the streets. Before you flame me about how could I know, FYI I
was a investigator for a rape case that resulted in the successful
apprehension and prosecution of the men who did it. I was the person
on duty when the victim came in to report it, so I have seen and
know about what a woman goes through to press charges.
Bob B
|
214.32 | Get an attitude | TIGEMS::SCHELBERG | | Wed Feb 25 1987 16:01 | 23 |
| Re: 31
Bob,
You made your point and I'm not flaming. I realize what your saying
is true if we could all take self defense or keep something in our
purses like mace etc to defend ourselves it would help.....it's
just too bad that we have to go to that extreme to feel somewhat
safe.
Bonnie was right when she said Lisa (Guardian Angels) was
attacked by five guys or so and she almost didn't make it. She
is an expert karate instructor or something and she ended up in
the hospital. So even if you know some defense your not that safe!
I liked to take a self-defense course myself but I don't have the
money to do so right now.......I just try to be extra careful mostly
at night. I agree on the positive attitude too. Most of them like
to prey on people who don't look confident.....men or women.
Bobbi
|
214.33 | | ESPN::HENDRICKS | Holly | Wed Feb 25 1987 16:30 | 47 |
| I had a bad experience with an unmarked taxi which has woken me
up with nightmares for years.
In D.C.,during some kind of transportation strike, it was common
to see unmarked station wagons being used as taxis one summer.
I never would have gotten in one alone, but I got in one at the
bus station with six other people. Things went fine, but I was
the last to be dropped off, and then the hassle started. Sexual
remarks, racial remarks, hand on my knee...it was awful, and I was
blaming and cursing myself for having gotten into the situation.
I even considered jumping out of the car, but would have lost 3
years of research notes (minor, maybe) and probably have killed
myself (not so minor). If that happened again today, I would make
sure I got out wherever the last person did -- the wisdom of hindsight.
I used to live at a conference center with 5 other people. There
were no workshops during the week, and it was rural and isolated.
I took a nap one afternoon and woke up in the late afternoon to
see a huge, strange man at the foot of my bed. I sat up abruptly
and said "What do you want?" He mumbled something about getting
his car fixed, and I told him he was in the wrong place. My heart
was pounding, and I could barely talk, but I knew it was important
to show no fear. Worst of all for me, someone had borrowed my car
and I was alone up on the hill with no one else home. I also had
a $2000 bank deposit downstairs which I was worried about!
I told him we had to go downstairs and he followed me closely.
I was still terrified, but tried to keep him talking. I thought
he was crazy. I finally told him I had to make a phone call. I
called the person who had my car and said "I need my car". He said
"What's wrong, are you ok?" and I kept repeating "I need my car".
My friend said "Are you ok" and I just kept repeating myself. Luckily,
he came right up, and the other guy didn't stop me from calling.
But after I got off the phone the man in the house said "Did you
call R____?". I had never mentioned my friend's name, but that
was who I called. This man stepped toward me, and said in a very
menacing tone of voice "You shouldn't have done that."
I felt like I was in a grade B movie at that point.
I was terrified, and thought I had some kind of crazy psychic on
my hands or something. R_____ came right up, and I was never so
grateful to see a man in my life! I acted like a classic terrified
female, though, and burst into tears as soon as relief arrived.
Turns out my friend had just thrown this guy out of his house!
|
214.34 | Karate for me... | TOOTER::GARY | inclined to wear bedroom slippers... | Wed Feb 25 1987 16:49 | 36 |
|
Let me state up front that I don't ANYthing is a sure protection
from harm, however, to say that just because ONE woman couldn't
handle FIVE attackers, self defense is not worth considering seems
short sighted to me.
Granted that karate will not solve all your problems (what will)
it goes along way towards fostering those positive (I am not a
victim) feeling that everyone (myself included) agrees are so
important. I for one feel much less like potential victim now
than I did before I started karate. I was in fact surprised by
just how much of a difference it has made in me. I guess the thing
was, I just couldn't believe that a woman could defeat a man in a
fight no matter what her training, well let me tell you now I DO
believe.
Karate does require quite a commitment in time and bruises, so I
see where it isn't for everyone. I was just wondering why it
hadn't come up as an (good in my opinion) option. To this
point (I think) it has only been suggested by men in this file.
-vicki
P.S. A parting thought, the woman who was beaten, she was in the
business of protecting other people. She presents the image of a very
strong woman, definitely not a victim. And the fact that she was beaten
once does nothing to diminish my respect for her. If you concentrate on
the defeats, you miss all of the victories she gave womankind by been
one of the protectors, instead of one of the victims. I believe that
martial arts training can give all of us some of the "eye of the tiger"
that a woman such as she possesses and make all of us a little less
apt to be victims.
|
214.35 | | GOJIRA::PHILPOTT | Ian F. ('The Colonel') Philpott | Wed Feb 25 1987 18:59 | 8 |
|
Fear is a basic survival trait.
In men as well as women.
/. Ian .\
|
214.36 | self defense shouldn't be required | PASCAL::BAZEMORE | Barbara b. | Wed Feb 25 1987 19:12 | 32 |
| I agree with .26, we should educate the system that attacking women
isn't a minor thing. I don't like the attitude : if you're a weak
looking woman you should go out and train in a martial art for a
couple of years so you can go look tough. I don't know if it is
natural for women in general to be "docile" or non-aggressive, but
I think it's wrong to blame anyone who is, man or woman, for not
being able to defend themselves. It is the attacker who should
be blamed!
I started self-defense training in college because I found myself
wandering across campus alone at all hours of the night after
debugging sessions. Now, a few years and many bruises later I have
a brown belt in Aikido. I love the art and I do have more
confidence because of it, not that I was lacking any to begin with.
Most of my original confidence came from always being able to
man-handle my two younger brothers, usually with nasty little tricks
like thumb screws and nerve pinches.
*BUT* I don't believe for one minute that I would come away unscathed
from a determined attacker. Go read the martial arts notesfile,
MSEE::ARTS if you want real-life examples about black belts getting
beaten up by boxers who don't attack like their sparring partners.
You're living in a fantasy land if you think that a black belt means
you can't get raped or that you have little to fear.
Yes, in this imperfect world it is a good idea to know a few defense
tricks and how to walk with an attitude. I'm pretty good at both,
but I still experience fear when I see a car warming up on the other
side of a dark parking lot, or hear footsteps behind me. Self-defense
training doesn't make the little fears go away.
Barbara b.
|
214.37 | | GOJIRA::PHILPOTT | Ian F. ('The Colonel') Philpott | Wed Feb 25 1987 19:29 | 69 |
|
re self defense courses.
Before an injury stopped me competing effectively I taught a number
of self defense courses including a specialised anti-rape course organised
by the local YWCA...
The best defence is usually stated to be a 10 second 100 metres dash.
The second best defence is developing the awareness to avoid the situation
in the first place.
Many sports, often of Eastern origin (Karate, Judo, Kung Fu, Tae Kwon
Do etc) are popular. You should be aware however that these are SPORTS,
with severe rules bringing disqualification for dirty moves that violate
the rules. Furthermore many of the more serious moves are "pulled" to
avoid injuring or killing the oponent. It is true that these sports
generate a feeling of self confidence, but it may be a very dangerous
self confidence indeed.
There is a huge difference between a fight with rules and pulled blows
in a well lit dojo, and a fight against multiple, probably armed, possible
high on dope, attackers in an unlit alley. They don't fight by the rules,
but in the emergency, when the adrenalin hits and you go on auto-pilot,
you may! This has led to more than one black belt being seriously injured.
Also, as a demo I used to ask a student to imagine that I was attacking
them from across the width of the dojo mat: as soon as they went into
a defensive stance I would draw my pistol from hip holster and fire
two (blank) shots. In all the times I used this test NO STUDENT ever
reached me with a defensive blow before the second shot was fired.
However I did a similar demo against a fello instructor once, his
qualifications being similar to mine. He didn't know what I planned
(he did know I had the gun, just as my rape-avoidance students did).
He hit me with a drop kick that knocked me out before I cleared leather,
so it can be done.
However my qualifications are not in the SPORT styles, but rather in
Tae Kwon Jitsu (the military form of Tae Kwon Do - I'm 5th Dan) and
Ninjitsu (3rd Dan), as well as the normal miltiary unarmed combat styles.
In these styles we use body armour and deliver blows at full force.
It is usually taught that to be able to disable or incapacitate an attacker
you must strike with a single blow, or combination, with sufficient
force and intent to kill.
However not to be totally negative about sport styles: many years ago
(I was at university) I had been attending a regular practice session
and we were all leaving. The parking lot of the gym was deserted and
as luck would have it the (female, 120lb, 5'2" Karate 7th Dan) instructor
left a few seconds ahead of us. She encountered 7 Hell's Angel types
in the parking lot who thought they would have fun. By the time we got
outside to see what the commotion was she was finishing off the seventh
one. Four were hospitalised, one of them was still there 8 months later
(he'd made the mistake of producing a knife - she'd used the doctrine
of trying to kill him, but failed). -- When the case came to court the
defence lawyer tried to claim that she'd attacked them (the jury thought
that was funny). The one who spent 8 months in hospital sued her --
the jury thought that was funny too - they awarded costs of several
thousand pounds against him! However she did get into a little trouble
for not formally warning them that she was skilled at a martial art
(English law is a bit odd here - only the fact that they outnumbered
her so heavily got the charge against her dropped. Had it been one on
one she might have been charged as well, even though she was defending
herself, because the use of this sort of skill without a formal warning
is not considered "reasonable force" to use in self defence).
/. Ian .\
|
214.38 | a slightly different perspective | STUBBI::B_REINKE | the fire and the rose are one | Wed Feb 25 1987 22:30 | 22 |
| re .34
Neither of the notes mentioning Lisa Silwa said that "self defense
is not worth considering". Rather the point is that no matter how
effective, it doesn't address the whole problem.
In re this whole fear/tension/awarness/whatever....
The one thing it brings to mind was back during the civil rights
period I was very conscious when I met a black person for the
first time that I had to "prove" myself to them. By this I mean
- as best as I can describe it - that they were testing me, and
I assume other white people to be sure that under the friendly
exterior there lay a real interest in who they were and what
they were interested in and a real commitment to justice, not
just a "summer soldier" attitude. It was a feeling of being on probation
and having to show that you were not a racist, and not some
bubble head trying to "be nice" to blacks because it was "in".
Although not excatly the same, this is similar to what is being
talked about here in regard to women reacting to men.
Bonnie
|
214.39 | nonviolence | NRLABS::TATISTCHEFF | | Wed Feb 25 1987 22:52 | 12 |
| I really am uncomfortable with the "violence for violence" reaction.
For me, violence is wrong, period (matter of personal conviction,
here; I recognize that others would disagree).
If I had been willing to be even a little more violent, perhaps
I wouldn't have been raped. So which is worse: living with the
aftermath of a rape, or with the knowledge that I have been violent
with another human being (albeit a pretty slimy one...)?
Maybe an easy decision for some, but I dunno...
Lee
|
214.40 | | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | | Thu Feb 26 1987 08:59 | 15 |
| Re .39, I agree with Lee. "Violence for violence" has sort of a
"if you can't beat them join them" attitude.
I have no interest in learning how to fight or use or own guns.
(I would consider carrying mace, but I thought it was illegal.)
I be miserable in one of those oriental fighting classes. I have
no interest in it. As far as I'm concerned guns were invented only
to take life and since very few of us have to go hunting in order
to survive today, I see no reason for people to even have guns.
I'm not going to let the ignorant, violent people of the world force
me to accept a life style I believe is wrong.
Lorna
|
214.41 | | GOJIRA::PHILPOTT | Ian F. ('The Colonel') Philpott | Thu Feb 26 1987 14:39 | 29 |
|
Mace and tear gas are legal in some states and illegal in others (Mass
I believe treats them in the same category as firearms, NH allows them).
Similarly you can buy electric "stun guns" of various types that again
are legal in some states (eg NH) but not others (eg Mass).
However these are, in my opinion, dangerous options. You have to be near
enough to use them, and there is a real risk of the assailant taking
them from you and using them against you.
As for firearms: I don't want to drive this debate down a rat hole, but
target shooting is an Olympic sport with 15 seperate medal competitions.
America is one of the few civilised countries that still allows its citizens
to own firearms for self defence.
Finally a colleague asked me about my earlier story of the young woman
who hospitalised a knife wielding assailant: a word of explanation. She
used a standard defence that relies on the fact that your leg is longer
than the assailants arm, and so leaned back to avoid the knife thrust,
and kicked him in the chest. Had she done this in the gym at full force
she would have broken a few ribs, and risked bursting a blood vessel,
or possibly if the blow landed just right, stopping the heart. ie the
blow either causes minor injuries or is lethal. Why then the very severe
injuries caused here? Simple really, in the gym she would have been fighting
bare foot. In the parking lot she was wearing shoes. And at the time
stilletto heels were fashionable...
/. Ian .\
|
214.42 | when I feel safe and when I don't | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | | Thu Feb 26 1987 17:36 | 18 |
| I've been thinking about where and when I feel safe, and where I
start putting up my defenses. Surprisingly, I feel most safe in
my bedroom at home and at work (not necessarily in that order!).
Work is populated by lots of people I know, and peoples' behavior
is (mostly) restrained here. My bedroom has always been my refuge
and the most safe spot in my house. I've lived away from my mother
and her husband since 1974, and it's only in the last few years
that I can comfortably sit in my own living room.
I, too, find myself becoming extremely alert when walking down
unfamiliar streets in the dark, or when approaching my car in the
dark. I also have a tendency to freeze when I'm really scared (I've
actually had the experience of trying to scream and not having any
sound come out). So when I'm feeling tense and scared, I force myself
to breathe deeply and slowly. That way, if I'm surprised, I'll have
air in my lungs that can be pushed out with a sound.
Liz
|
214.43 | Looking for Mace | VAXUUM::MUISE | | Thu Mar 05 1987 10:33 | 9 |
| If mace is legal in NH, could someone tell me how
and where to obtain it?
Of all possible means of dealing with *my* fears,
carrying mace is by far the most comfortable,
most reasonable method I can think of, for me.
Jacki
|
214.44 | | GOJIRA::PHILPOTT | Ian F. ('The Colonel') Philpott | Fri Mar 06 1987 16:10 | 8 |
|
re finding Mace/tear gas
buy a copy of Guns & Ammo from your friendly magazine seller, and check
out the mail order businesses selling the macho goodies - they nearly
all sell gas sprays and electro-stun guns.
/. Ian .\
|
214.45 | Its a two way street: They assailants can .. | SCOUT::EARLY | | Fri Mar 06 1987 23:37 | 9 |
| re: Mace / Tear gas
I seem to recall a "mugging" that took place in <somewhere>, in
which the assailant used MACE to "disable" the victim.
"ANYONE" can purchase these <chemicals>; even the asailants !
Bob
|
214.46 | Beware of the false sense of security! | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Sat Mar 07 1987 21:59 | 5 |
| ... and I saw a test of hand-carried MACE on television a few years
back which showed it to be pretty ineffectual. Somebody that didn't
really want to attack might be dissuaded, but a determined assailant
was not stopped. In real life, he (sexual stereotype here?) might
just get madder.
|
214.47 | Teddy bear with muscles. | SNEAKY::SULLIVAN | OPUS | Sun Mar 08 1987 03:18 | 24 |
|
Several years ago, on the campus of the University of Colorado
at Boulder, the number of rapes began to skyrocket. My girlfriend
was a near-victim, and that gave me the need to take action. I,
with several other males from Baker Hall (a large dorm) approached
the University with the idea to escort women home from various
locations on and near campus. They gave us their blessing though
they could not officially sanction us.
A local women's group (they reffered to themselves as 'WOMYN')
complained that there was the possibliity of rape by the males who
were doing the escorting. As a result, the University ordered the
service ended. Another escort service (which remains in service
to this day) apparently uses mainly female escorts, though I am
really not fully aware of their recent changes.
We don't feel anything like anger over this, since our purpose
is being served, but I will never quite understand the antagonistic
position of that group of womyn. We tried. We always had more
than one escort with a escortee or group of escortees. I, as a
rather large male, feel as if I will never be trusted.
I guess I understand, but I will never like it.
|
214.48 | | CSSE::CICCOLINI | | Tue Mar 10 1987 12:12 | 10 |
| You sound like you really do understand, like it or not! Just be
glad that the situation doesn't mean danger for you, only annoyance.
The male 'escort' service worked at U-Mass and it worked at Clark
University, which is in one of the highest-crime areas in Worcester.
I too would be suspicious of a group of males who volunteer to help
'maidens in distress' but I would have checked them out rather than
just written them off.
Re: mace - I've heard that hairspray, (in the old freon-laden cans),
works just as well at stinging the eyes.
|
214.49 | Rust-oleum | CACHE::MARSHALL | hunting the snark | Tue Mar 10 1987 16:26 | 13 |
| re .48 (mace, hairspray):
How 'bout spray paint...
"Yes officer, the guy that attacked me now has a flourescent orange
face, should be easier to identify"
/
( ___
) ///
/
|
214.50 | Don't get carried away | MAY20::MINOW | I need a vacation | Tue Mar 10 1987 21:48 | 12 |
| If you're thinking of carrying a weapon (even Mace or spray paint),
you would be well advised to talk things over with someone with
experience -- perhaps a rape hotline. I would suspect that, if you
are attacked and don't totally incapacitate the assailant, you might
be in even worse trouble.
My friend who did research on self-defense training and rape once
mentioned that women who had self-defense training were less likely
to be raped, but more likely to suffer additional injuries during
the rape.
Martin.
|
214.51 | Rape is still worse. | ULTRA::GUGEL | Simplicity is Elegance | Wed Mar 11 1987 10:15 | 9 |
| re -1:
Personally, I'd rather suffer the additional injuries than be raped.
I'd rather live with the injuries than with the memory of rape (or
worse - some disease or pregnancy). To know that I fought as hard as
I could against some greasy slimeball worm and come out badly injured,
but with my dignity intact.
-Ellen
|
214.53 | worse than worse | CACHE::MARSHALL | hunting the snark | Wed Mar 11 1987 18:52 | 14 |
| re .51:
> Personally, I'd rather suffer the additional injuries than be
> raped.
Understandable, but I interpreted Martin as saying that those who
resist, but don't incapacitate the attacker, end up getting raped
AND more injuries.
/
( ___
) ///
/
|
214.54 | Statistics? | HPSCAD::TWEXLER | | Tue Mar 17 1987 11:53 | 12 |
| RE 52
>"...these statistics imply that upon receiving a firm no and
>determined physical resistance that the same proportion of men
>would turn homicidal?"
I learned from the Boston Area Rape Crisis Center that a survey
was done on Harvard men within the past 5 years (sorry I don't remember
the year) and one of the questions asked the men if they would rape
a woman if they could get away with it. 93% answered yes.
Tamar
|
214.55 | | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Tue Mar 17 1987 12:13 | 20 |
|
A couple of years ago I heard a report on National Public Radio about
a similar research project (I hope it's the same one mentioned in .54
because 93% would be unthinkable).
The experimental and control groups consisted of about 1000 college-age
men. They found that 33% of the men admitted that they might commit a
rape if they thought they could get away with it. (Sound of my jaw
hitting the floor -- note that this is the percentage that *admitted*
thinking this way.) They found further that the percentage could be
increased to 50% by showing a series of five pornographic films that
portrayed violence against women.
However, I've also read reports that claim the issue is not pornography;
these reports say that the films are harmful to the extent that they
show violence toward and degradation of women -- the pornographic
aspect is unimportant.
JP
|
214.57 | trust :=wait | IMAGIN::KOLBE | Oh no, it's HER again!! | Thu Mar 19 1987 00:56 | 22 |
| Something that I feel and have not seen mentioned here is the way
some men assume that if you let one man put his arm around you or
flirt with you that it's open season. You always have to be aware
that you will leave the "wrong impression" in some male minds.
I can share an off-color joke with men that I know well but the
same joke around men I don't consider close would embarass me and
make me very uncomfortable. The same goes for physical contact.
I agree with the others that stated we do not live in gut tearing fear
of all men but we must always be cautious. I have to agree with
Carol that the parking lot after dark is worthy of suspicion. I
always check the back seat to make sure it's empty and have my keys
ready to use as a weapon. I prefer walking out with one of the guys
if it's after dark. Unfortunately there's not always someone ready
to leave when you are.
To all you men who read this file, the Goddess knows we love you
(we can't help ourselves :*)) it's just that we have to be so carefull
it takes time to trust you. Liesl
|
214.58 | The light is getting brighter! | GENRAL::FRASHER | An opinion for any occasion | Tue Mar 24 1987 11:24 | 12 |
| Sometimes I am almost ashamed to be a man because so many men are
animals that women assume that I must be also. If I say 'hi' to
a woman, I get a look like "what are you going to do?". Hell, I'm
just being friendly, but I can understand why it happens. It takes
me about 2 weeks to win a friendly 'hi' in return. Its too bad
that women have to be so cautious. I had almost given up on saying
anything to women because of the looks that I got. Its getting
a lot better now that I've worked here for 4 years and my face is
becoming familiar to people and, after reading this note, I can
better understand why it happens.
Spence
|
214.59 | Sad... | NRLABS::TATISTCHEFF | | Tue Mar 24 1987 12:43 | 8 |
| re .58:
yes, Spence, that is the worst part about it; "we" can't know if
you're nice or not by your face or your walk, so we develop a defensive
attitude towards _everybody_. I am a friendly person and like to
walk around smiling, saying hi to people, but I can't without fear.
Lee
|
214.61 | Is more of the same only more of the same? | ULTRA::ZURKO | UI:Where the rubber meets the road | Tue Mar 24 1987 16:24 | 8 |
| re: .60
I was about to do the same schtick that's been done here before
(hoping you'd take a close look at it, and think about it for a
minute), and say something like the last 18,720 I was treated in
a negative, sexist manner, it was by men (now this number is *tres*
conservative). But that's not true; there were some women in there
too :-(.
Mez
|
214.62 | defensive by situation | PASCAL::BAZEMORE | Barbara b. | Tue Mar 24 1987 18:55 | 11 |
| > I suggest that we be defensive by situation and place instead of race
> and sex.
But it has already been shown that there are very few situations
and places where a woman can really let her guard down. And I'm
sure that attacks on women are made almost exclusively by men (except
perhaps in Filene's Basement :-). I agree with your sentiment,
but I'm afraid that it doesn't open up a whole lot of carefree
horizons.
Bb
|
214.64 | Uncomfortable situations vs. dangerous ones | ULTRA::GUGEL | Spring is for rock-climbing | Wed Mar 25 1987 11:58 | 16 |
| re -1:
I think maybe what Mez was talking about wasn't necessarily situations
in which she was in danger, but rather situations in which she feels
*uncomfortable*. I, as a woman, am placed in these situations at
least weekly. There is one man who works in this building who openly
leers and stares at women. I find this truly *uncomfortable*.
For the same reason, I don't go into the natural foods store I used
to since the new owner is a man who leers at me and calls me honey.
Until the world is free of these kind of turkeys, women will never
be truly free.
Dangerous? No. Uncomfortable? You bet!
-Ellen
|
214.66 | It's not men so much as.... | WATNEY::SPARROW | You want me to do what?? | Wed Mar 25 1987 17:53 | 16 |
| My greatest time of fear was while in the army. I lived in a
barracks of 130 women. 10 of us were straight. The harassment towards
the 10 of us from 120 lesbian women was tremendous. I have never
felt the same level of fear as I did then, but then I had been beaten,
chased, cut, stabbed, and thrown down a flight of steps.
This was done to all ten of us in a 1 year time frame. My commanding
officer was also a lesbian so all these attacks never got past her
for investigation. Eventually, I went to the male chaplain and
he got me moved out of the barracks. I guess it sounds funny, but
it is military lesbians that I fear most. I don't fear men though...
one thing I learned in the army that is hard to explain....(they
taught us protection against men) was if you walk with an air
of kick a**, like extreme confidence, you are left alone, however
if you walk like a possible victim, your chances increase in becoming
one. It works......
vivian
|
214.67 | Not that easy | NRLABS::TATISTCHEFF | | Wed Mar 25 1987 19:10 | 19 |
| re .65:
It is very hard to tell who is Neanderthal and who is a normal
human being. And if you try talking to/reasoning with a neanderthal,
he will often seem pretty human for a while. The date rape note
is one explanation of why we feel this fear, even at stupid times;
you can be raped by your best friend or SO, even in your own home.
How are you to know that this person you thought was human is actually
Neanderthal? And once you have had even one close call, that
unreasoning fear can crop up at the stupidest of times.
And even though I have told myself again and again that it was
particularly nasty neanderthals who raped me, it is hard to be near
anyone of that race without being angry. These fears are not things
you can reason with, and if we could control them, life would be a lot
nicer.
Lee
|
214.68 | | GOJIRA::PHILPOTT | Ian F. ('The Colonel') Philpott | Thu Mar 26 1987 10:53 | 34 |
| .66� ... one thing I learned in the army that is hard to explain ...
was if you walk with an air of kick a**, like extreme confidence,
you are left alone, however if you walk like a possible victim, your
chances increase in becoming one.
There was some research published a couple of years back: they
showed film of people walking down the street to a bunch of
convicted muggers and asked them in each case "is this person
somebody you would mug". There was a very high degree of agreement
between the muggers as to which were the potential victims.
They then investigated why they were potential victims. Reasons
quoted included things like
"he/she walks funny"
"he/she looks easy"
"he/she looks scared"
Some of the people shown were various types of combat experts: they
walked confident. NONE of the muggers picked out these people as
victims even though one of them was a 5' 0" woman and another a 5'1"
man.
The moral is that if you're afraid you seriously increase the
possibility of attack. Indeed fear is a self justifying sensation.
It appears that what started as a survival trait (in olden times
fear as a hair-trigger to the flight mechanism increased your
probability of survival) now just marks you as a victim.
/. Ian .\
|
214.69 | Looking confident | GENRAL::FRASHER | An opinion for any occasion | Thu Mar 26 1987 11:46 | 10 |
| This reminds me of how dogs (animals) can sense fear. Maybe people
(muggers) can also sense fear.
I was told to walk upright, not slouched, chest out, and looking
up, not down. Reasons: slouching is a sign of inferior feelings.
Chest out shows confidence in oneself. Looking down is a sign of
fear and also gives a mugger/rapist the edge in not being seen ahead
of time.
Spence
|
214.70 | attitude | RANGER::IANNUZZO | Catherine T. | Thu Mar 26 1987 16:06 | 14 |
| Attitude has much more to do with self-defense than any combination
of techniques. Women can be taught what to do, but in an intensely
stressful, adrenalin-pumping situation no one is likely to think
of it unless they are powered by a fundamental will-to-survive and
will to hurt others in order to do so. I'm sure this sounds
horrendous, especially since women are so deeply conditioned to
want to care for others, to see any social interaction from the
other's point of view (mugging counts as a social interaction),
that many of them don't really believe deep down inside that it's
okay to hurt someone else in their own defense. The cute tricks
with the car keys, etc. won't work unless you're totally convinced
you have the right to control your own body and life, the right
and the absolute willingness to tear someone's eyes out if that's
what it takes.
|
214.71 | | ARMORY::CHARBONND | | Fri Mar 27 1987 09:36 | 4 |
| "Attitude" is great, but when you're bluffing, sooner or
later someone will call you on it. There is no substitute
for effective *means* of self defense. To paraphrase -
"God didn't make all people equal, Colonel Colt did."
|
214.72 | It is not just physical strength that is needed. | BUFFER::LEEDBERG | Truth is Beauty, Beauty is Truth | Fri Mar 27 1987 10:07 | 13 |
|
I am under the assumption that most attacks on women come from
people that we know. They know where or not you can defend
yourself or not, there is no bluffing. I think the idea of
self-defence is good if a woman wants to do that but it will not
stop her lover from raping her, or her father from beating her.
The fear is not just of "the ones we do not know" it is mostly
of the ones we love the most.
_peggy (-)
|
|
214.73 | clarification on "attitude" | RANGER::IANNUZZO | Catherine T. | Fri Mar 27 1987 10:15 | 12 |
| I didn't mean that "attitude" could be something that could
be assumed as a bluff, or that it is a substitute for
effective means of defense. What I meant is that a fundamental
conviction that you have the right and willingness to defend
your being will take you a long way -- without it, the
mace will remain unused in your pocketbook and you might as
well hand over the Colt to your assailant. With it, whatever
comes to hand can be a weapon. Admittedly, a pocketbook isn't
much defense against an Uzi, and I'm not saying that
that determination is the only element in any struggle,
but without it, you can't effectively use what means of defense
you have.
|
214.74 | | FAUXPA::ENO | Bright Eyes | Fri Mar 27 1987 11:22 | 5 |
| A minor point, Ian.
Don't confuse being fearful with appearing fearful. Individuals
can become experts at concealing their fear, appearing confident
and fearless when in fact they are quivering in their boots.
|
214.75 | re.73 | ARMORY::CHARBONND | | Fri Mar 27 1987 12:00 | 1 |
| With you 100% on that, Catherine
|
214.76 | What "attitude" means to me | HUMAN::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Sun Mar 29 1987 22:26 | 55 |
| While it is true that bluffing doesn't work, it is not really
the case that you have to be physcally capable of fending off
any conceivable attack either. When I was young and got the guys
to stop beating me up it wasn't because I was suddenly able to
beat all or any of them. It happened when I said "Enough!", when
I said deep done in the soul of me "This is wrong and it won't
happen any more."
It didn't stop 100% or all at once, but I went from at least
daily beatings to one or two a year, and then over a period of a
couple of years it went way all together. To this day if I were
to win a fight with almost anybody it wouldn't be from
exceptional ability but from mere dogged determination. I've
gone from being a little short and skinny to a little short and
pudgy, or at least healthily plump.
I agree with Ian and Lisa Silwa, self defense is not the answer,
at least not short of truly lethal training. If you are in
physical danger it is wisest to cut and run. But even more
important is to not get into the situation, and that can best be
acheived by knowing deep down that you have the right to not be
bullied and the determination to survive anything the world can
throw at you.
When I was last beaten it was in college by a black tough whose
only interest in being in college was that the alternative was
the state penn. The last guy he beat up spent a long time in the
hospital, and the local interpretation of affirmative action
involved turning a blind eye. I didn't lift a hand in my
defense--that's what he wanted an excuse to really let go--but I
did defy him. Nor, advisable as it usually is, did I run--I was
surrounded by his hooligans and they'd have stopped me sure.
I stood my ground and talked. When he threw my by the throat or
knocked me down I got up. I worked my way to a more lighted area
slowly and deliberately. I let him know that he could hurt me
but he couldn't scare me. Eventually, a fellow student--another
black--stopped him. I returned to the student union where it all
had started and continued on with business as usual. I can't
claim to know for certain, but Willy never beat another student
after me, and I'll always believe it was because he couldn't
risk running into another person he couldn't scare. He bullied
and he threatened and he postured, but he didn't actually batter
anyone again.
In my day I've fought back with passive defiance, with my fists,
with weapons, and by running like hell. What I refuse to do is
live in fear, or to not defend myself. What I know now and will
never forget is that I have a right to not be bullied or beaten,
and that I refuse to let others control me with fear or guilt.
In some manner I will defend myself and the bastards will never
win again. They terrorized me before and thereby they won. That
will never happen again.
JimB.
|
214.77 | Another idea | GENRAL::FRASHER | An opinion for any occasion | Mon Mar 30 1987 13:49 | 6 |
| I once read that the best defense against a rapist is to go along
with him, pretending to enjoy it and request to do it right. Then,
when he has his pants around his ankles, kick him in the groin and
run like hell.
Spence
|
214.78 | | SOFTY::HEFFELFINGER | The valient Spaceman Spiff! | Tue Mar 31 1987 11:13 | 91 |
| < Note 214.76 by HUMAN::BURROWS "Jim Burrows" >
-< What "attitude" means to me >-
> What I refuse to do is
>live in fear, or to not defend myself. What I know now and will
>never forget is that I have a right to not be bullied or beaten,
>and that I refuse to let others control me with fear or guilt.
>In some manner I will defend myself and the bastards will never
>win again. They terrorized me before and thereby they won. That
>will never happen again.
Once again, Jim, you say what I was gearing up to say.
Maybe I'm the only woman in the world that feels this
way (sure seems like I'm in the minority in *this* note at least).
But I don't really think so, in fact I know many more women that
feel the way I do, than the way most of the respondents to this note
seem to feel. I DON'T live in constant fear/awareness/alertness (call it
what you will). I don't fear men as a class. (This is not to say
that I am without fear. There are situations and individuals (male
and female) that scare me shitless.) What I refuse let happen is
to let this make my life a constant battle.
I take long walks at night in the dark by myself in
my neighborhood. I'm reasonable about it. I stick to the better
half/better light half of the neighborhood, but I still go. I
stop any time I damn well please to get gas for my car. I certainly
never go in "packs" to the bathroom. (I think I'd fall over in
shock if any of my friends or acquaintances suggested it!) I walk
by myself without fear in uptown, in the country, wherever. This
is not to say that I am reckless or that I ignore the risk of attack.
Some one earlier in the note said that she would not learn to hurt
another being because she (approximate quote) "refused to allow
them to force her to live her life in a way she considers wrong".
Well that's just how I feel. If I allow "them" to make me feel like
a constant potential victim, "they" have won. Whether I have been
attacked or not, whether any ever happens to me or not, "they" have
won because "they" have caused me to live my life in a manner that
I do wish to live it.
I think the key to my sense of freedom from fear is
the aforementioned CERTAINTY that I do not have to put up with
this. This frees me to act with a confident air that tends to keep
the "wolves at bay". And if I am attacked, (and it has happened)
it frees me to act instantly and with righteous rage giving me strength
and courage.
In the about 10 years that I have been an indepedent
walker around town (for lack of a better term ;-)) I have been attacked
twice. Both times unsuccessfully. In one instance, when I was
about 15, a man attempted to snatch my purse in broad daylight on
a sidewalk in Columbia, (The closest thing we've got to a big town
here in S.C. :-)). I grabbed the strap as he pulled the purse off
my arm and pulled it HARD! (I couldn't let him take it from me. I wasn't
finished with the book I had in there! ;-)) When the purse was loose,
I smacked him in the head with it. (Remember the book? It was
a BIG hardcover...) I then turned and ran and calmly informed the
nearest policeman of what happened. The bugger had disappeared so no
charges could be pressed. I just continued my shopping around town.
This was all automatic reaction from me, stemming from the fact
that I was incensed that he should try this with me.
Even though I'm only 5'1", I was not attacked again until my
sophomore year in college. I think that's due for most most part
to my determined-I've-definiately-got-things-to-do-non-victim walk.
(My belief in this is strengthened by the fact that the night I
was attacked I was tired and walking much slower and without the
cannonball aproach to traffic navigation I usually take.) While
walking on campus from the dining hall back to my dorm, I passed
an area in the which one of the streetlights was burnt out. A man
jumped out from behind the bushes, put a hand over my mouth, and
started pulling me back to the bushes and tried to pull my coat
off. My reaction was not fear but FURY. I bit his hand (hard enough
to draw blood) when he let go I turned and kicked him in the crotch
as hard as I could. He hit the ground. I ran to the dorm to report
the incident. Again, I think it was that SURENESS that I would
not allow this to happen, that allowed my to react to quickly and
surely and really startle my attacker. In the 6 years since then,
I have not been attacked again.
Before I get flamed... I realize that not all situations
can be fought off. I realize that not acting like a victim may
not keep you from being attacked. (Obviously, since I was attacked
twice.) But,... I could be attacked in my home any day of the week.
I cannot be completely free from risk and still be alive. I consider
it a victory that I live my life the way I want to live and be damned
to those that want to make me a victim. They may make my body a
the recipient of harm but I refuse to allow them to make ME a victim.
tlh
|
214.79 | I feel the way you do too. | ULTRA::GUGEL | Spring is for rock-climbing | Tue Mar 31 1987 12:47 | 14 |
| re 78:
"Some folks have an easy answer.
They buy a lock and they live in a cage.
But my fear is turning to anger
And my anger is turning to rage.
And I won't live my life in a cage. NO!"
-Holly Near
I'll type in the whole song if I remember to bring the lyrics
from home.
-Ellen
|
214.80 | | RANGER::IANNUZZO | Catherine T. | Tue Mar 31 1987 13:12 | 21 |
| re: .78
you have expressed it exactly perfectly! That "righteous rage"
gives you power in moments of conflict, and that basic assurance
that you are not a victim and refuse to live in fear gives you
power in your life. Unfortunately, most women are brought up
to be victims, to have their lives shaped for them by others.
This is considered a feminine virtue in our society. You
have not internalized the equation that woman = victim,
but many women who have been conditioned to be "good girls"
are not so free.
I believe strongly that all women need to rid themselves
of the victim mindset in order to live as free human beings.
The society needs to change as well, but a woman's freedom
cannot depend on waiting for the environment to adapt.
It comes for each woman from knowing herself free within,
refusing to accept the victim's place assigned her by our
society and acting accordingly. In due time, the society
will be forced to change when the victims are no longer there.
|
214.81 | DEC Field Service -- the great equalizer... | NEXUS::CONLON | Persistent dreamer... | Tue Mar 31 1987 13:44 | 47 |
| The funny thing about VAX's is that they
like to break in the middle of the night. Even
funnier is that when they do break, customers who
pay big bucks for 24x7 service contracts like to
have them repaired in the middle of the night (no
matter *where* the customer's site happens to be
located.)
When you work in Field Service, a "down
system" is enough to throw your body in "wide awake"
mode at almost any hour (no matter how little sleep
you've had.) And when you head out into the night
in your little DEC-mobile (that happens to be filled
to the brim with expensive toys like oscilloscopes,
tools, and costly computer parts) -- it never occurs
to you that the part of town you are heading toward
might have dangers lurking about. When the computer
goes down and the customer requests service asap --
you go. It's that simple. The fact that you are a
woman doesn't even come up in the conversation when
the decisions are made to provide service.
At least it never came up in *my* branch!!
We had 5 or 6 women in large systems (most of whom often
volunteered for extra standby duty) -- so we had women
out tearing around the city at all hours of the night
working on systems (sometimes in the worst parts of
town, like industrial areas.)
I can't speak for the other women in my branch,
but as for me, I never worried about my safety. My
movements were *very* purposeful (I always made the
deliberate motions of a person who is where he/she is
*supposed* to be and is doing what he/she is *supposed*
to be doing.) I was a person who fixed computers and
I was out on an electronic mercy mission. I definitely
looked like I meant business (and I did.) I never even
came *close* to having a problem out at night.
I don't make a habit of joy-riding or going
out strolling in the middle of the night -- but when
I have somewhere that I need to go, I go. There's a
lot to be said for carrying yourself in a manner that
says you are out for a reason (and don't intend to be
hassled by anyone.)
Suzanne...
|
214.83 | Take Back the Night, and the day... | MDKCSW::LOESCH | Wu go your Wei, and I'll go mine. | Wed Apr 01 1987 14:10 | 28 |
| re .79
Here's the rest of "Fight Back" as I remember it:
By day I live in terror
By night I live in fright
For as long as I can remember
A woman can't out alone at night
Fight Back!
And so we've got to fight back
In large numbers
Fight Back, can't make it alone
Fight Back, in large numbers
Together we can make a safe home
Women all around the world
Every color every religion and age
One thing we have in common
We can all be battered and raped.
<refrain, Ellen's verse, refrain>
To be sung acapella, -- with a thousand women
marching at night in unsafe parts of the city.
(or any other time you need a pick_me_up)
- Beth
|
214.84 | WARNING..... NECKLACE STEALING TACTIC IN BOSTON | TORA::KLEINBERGER | MAXCIMize your efforts | Mon Jul 13 1987 09:06 | 33 |
| I didn't want to start a new topic for this note, so decided to
put it under "FEAR".... since if it happened to you, it could be
"fearful" while happening...
I was traveling in Boston on foot on Saturday, around 7pm, walking
from City Hall to the Commons, almost past the graveyard where Samuel
Adams is buried (sorry, don't know the street, but this should give
you a good idea of the area)...
We (my mom, brother (21), and my boyfriend (36 and 6"3') were walking
on the sidewalk, when we were approached by five black youths (age
approx 15 to 16), we thought they were going to try to steal mom's
purse, so we edged her to the street, so they could not get to her,
HOWEVER, in the meantime, one of the youths grabbed my shirt at the
neckline (I thought he was trying to look at my chest - and thought -
why a free peek from me.... I don't have much "up there"), when it
suddenly dawned on me that he had stolen the gold chain I had around
my neck!... At the same time he did this, another one of the youths
yelled out "NO!"....
So please BEWARE of this tactic! Luckily, nobody was hurt, I notified
the cops (would not make a report though), and the necklace was
a buy one get one free necklace sale, and it was $12.00 marked down
to $6.00, buying one, getting one free made it a $3.00 purchase,
so it wasn't a large monetary loss... just a nice looking CHEAP
gold chain....
However, if I can prevent it happening to another... that is what
this note is for....
Gale
|
214.85 | | CALLME::MR_TOPAZ | | Mon Jul 13 1987 09:43 | 16 |
| re .84:
Fear is indeed a good topic for your note: I'd guess that the kids
sensed right away that you were afraid of what they might be up to,
which put them at a tremendous advantage. Punks are much more likely
to try to take advantage of people whom they figure won't fight back.
I'm glad that the monetary loss was negligible and there weren't any
physical injuries; it's a shame that you have (presumably) lost some
of your sense of freedom, at least in terms of walking through the
city.
--Don
p.s.: Unless you were going to describe the specific individuals
who stole the chain, it seems to me that identifying their
race is at best gratuitous.
|
214.86 | | SUPER::HENDRICKS | Not another learning experience! | Mon Jul 13 1987 21:49 | 8 |
| Gale, that sounds extremely terrifying. I never worry about such
incidents in a group of 4 people. Were the kids armed, or did they
assault you with intimidation and force?
I am making a mental note to leave off even the imitation gold chains
next time I go downtown!
|
214.87 | | TORA::KLEINBERGER | MAXCIMize your efforts | Tue Jul 14 1987 08:03 | 11 |
| I don't know if they were armed... and I was not about to let anyone
find out!
It was brut force, and that was all, which is what surprised me
because Bob is 6 foot 3 inches!!!
On a happier note, I came home from work yesterday, and my mother
gave me a box... I opened the box, and there was a much nicer chain
in it, with a request to not wear it into Boston :-)
Gale (who is off to Fall River today)
|
214.88 | Don't admit defeat | AKOV04::WILLIAMS | | Tue Jul 14 1987 12:11 | 15 |
| By not wearing exposed jewelry when walking in and around the
city we are saying the scum have won, that we can't be protected
from them. I'm certain the experience was terrible and I feel sorry
that you experienced it.
Libby, my wife, works for Bank of Boston in the heart of the
financial district, and brings home many horrible stories of what
the city of Boston is quickly becoming, and stolen jewlery is the
least of problem. We must not accept the city going to hell as
some sort of preordained fact or insurmountable reality. Scream
at the politicians, at the mayor, at the damned police. Don't accept
the loss of the city, even a small part of it. When we give up
on the city, what will be next?
Douglas
|
214.89 | Be Proactive! | MARCIE::JLAMOTTE | Somewhere Over the Rainbow | Tue Jul 14 1987 18:20 | 38 |
| I take exception to the comments about the city. Indeed we have
a high crime rate, but in proportion to the numbers of people in
the city on a given day and the circumstances that breed crime the
city is doing an excellent job. I lived in Marlboro for many years
and moved to Boston four years ago. Some time ago Marlboro was
considered one of the safest cities in the country. And yet I know
of two possible homicides in that city that were ignored by the
local men in blue. I also knew of several rapes that were not
prosecuted for whatever reason. A local policeman was asked to
resign when it was discovered that several stores on his beat had
been robbed and it seemed that he might have been the robber.
The politicians, the police and the neighborhood committees are
doing everything they can to eliminate crime. It is my opinion
that the city of Boston has a real plan in place and is working
that plan. It appears to me that suburban communities try to
de-emphasize crime in their areas so the population tends to sit
dumb and happy by their fireplaces until *it* happens to them.
I was robbed in Marlboro, I have been robbed in Boston. Fear does
not make me change my ways common sense does. I don't consider
that giving in I consider it being pro-active. Be prepared before
you go into the street, whether it be in Marlboro or Boston. The
last murder in Marlboro was committed by a young man who lived in
the neighborhood I brought my children up with. It was very
unfortunate, I was acquainted with his mother and my heart goes
out to her. My son attended the wake of the young woman that was
killed and oh does my heart go out to them. What they have suffered
is incredible.
I don't walk on the street after dark, I don't give rides to anyone,
and I do not wear expensive jewelry so that it can be seen. I have
not given in I am going to beat them at their game.
These rules apply to Boston and the suburbs!
|
214.90 | Fear | YAZOO::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Mon Jan 04 1988 17:36 | 149 |
| moved by moderator
<<< VIKING::$2$DJA6:[NOTES$LIBRARY]WOMANNOTES.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Topics of Interest to Women >-
================================================================================
Note 633.0 Fear 3 replies
CAPVAX::PAPISON "You see what I'm saying....." 31 lines 4-JAN-1988 12:12
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-< Denial/Projection >-
Fear, hmmm, how do most people deal with it?
Psychologists will tell us that denial and projection are the two most
common forms of defense when fear is an issue. Fear causes some varied
reactions it seems, and fear of personal inadequacies can cause pretty
intense interactions.
How do you deal with fears based on inadequacies (real or perceived)??
Do you deny and/or project, although they seem to be connected rather that
distinct??
How do you deal with someone projecting their fears on you, that is to say
someone has chosen you to the guilty party in order to deny their fears
are their own??
denial/projection seems to effect both the projector and projectee in
different, and powerful ways.
================================================================================
Note 633.1 Fear 1 of 3
CAM2::PAPISON "You see what I'm saying....." 46 lines 4-JAN-1988 15:30
-< clarification.... >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I apologize for not setting the premise correctly for the base note.
Let me try to define some "terminology" that may make this discussion,
and the base note more understandable. Certainly one could take argument
with the definitions, and although it may degenerate into this, my
desire is that it would not.
The base note refers to "fear", not in the definition of "Websters", but in
a much more philosophical way. One can assume that humanity carries with
it an overpowering sense of something "bad" in the world, something with
the intent to hurt, something deserving of "punishment". It is said that
mankind responds to the "sense of something bad" in two ways, dependent (in
general) on whether the "bad" is external or internal. If the sense of
"bad" is external we could be expected to respond with anger or dislike (or
more strongly "hatred") If, on the other hand, the sense of "bad" in internal
we could be expected to respond with "guilt". Wherever we see "guilt" we tend
to respond with fear. What do you think, do you feel comfortable with guilt
or do you feel afraid the the "bad" you feel inside is something wrong with
yourself. That's where the discussion of denial/projection begins.
Now then....based on those loose philosophical/psychological definitions on
could say (in the sense of the base note), that fear can be defined as the
minds response to guilt. Certainly the textbook definition of fear extends
beyond guilt response, and yet one can now see (hopefully) the definition
of "fear" as used in the base note.
I would venture to say that many of us have not stopped to analyze our
emotions to that level, however these premises are generally accepted in
psychological circles. I won't argue with .1 statement that it sounds like
guilt to him/her, for the result is the same whether you call it fear or
guilt. My question being the same, perhaps restated, in the following
manner:
If, in the course of a relationship you find yourself involved with someone
who cannot adress his/her guilt/fear and in fact chooses to deny/project that
guilt/fear (upon you) as a manner of escaping it, how do you respond ??
================================================================================
Note 633.2 Fear 2 of 3
ATPS::RELENG 12 lines 4-JAN-1988 16:24
-< Don't Keep It! Give It Back! >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If I understand what you are asking for, you do it like this:
First person: "You made me feel guilty because..."
Second person: "I didn't *make* you feel *anything*. If you
feel guilty, it's because that is how you've
chosen to feel."
The first person will undoubtedly deny this, but in time, they stop
trying to play the game of who to blame what on. It's a game of
manipulation.
Is this what you were looking for?
================================================================================
Note 633.3 Fear 3 of 3
CAPVAX::PAPISON "You see what I'm saying....." 34 lines 4-JAN-1988 16:47
-< Maybe this... >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's much more insideous than that I'm afraid.
the dialog might be more like.
First person (having been told all its life it's not o.k., and now
feeling it)
"The reason this relationship failed is you!!!!"
Hidden agenda..I'm afraid everyones right, and if I blame you then
I can tell everone it's your fault, and not be told I'm inadequate
Woe is me this person has treated me bad, can't you all see.
Denying the guilt and projecting the blame
Party 2 ( being sensitive to the need to LISTEN and wanting to make
thinks work )
" Gee, maybe the problem IS mine, now I feel bad about wanting to
talk."
Voila...Party 2 now feels guilty for the failure of the relationship
and PRESTO it feels guilt
Kinda makes a vicious circle wouldn't you say ???
|