T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
156.2 | I would n't like kids like that | STUBBI::B_REINKE | Down with bench Biology | Tue Dec 30 1986 21:41 | 7 |
| I don't tolerate behavior like that in my own childrenn, tho they
at times try and get away with it and I would not hesitate to take
on any other child or parents who treated me that way in public.
Rudeness is rudness, no matter how you try and describe it. People
who bring their children up that way do them a disservice.
Bonnie
|
156.3 | | ESPN::HENDRICKS | Holly | Tue Dec 30 1986 21:55 | 40 |
| When I was teaching, the teachers blamed the parents and the parents
blamed the teachers/school system/administration.
At this point I have come to a conclusion that shocks me! I am
greatly in favor of civil rights for everyone, but I would be ready
to curtail a few that apply to children. (or maybe I'm just getting
to be an old fogey?)
Look at the role models. Listen to the message in the music. Look
at the kinds of behaviors idealized on television. Add in a few
basic human qualities of "not feeling like doing (whatever)" and
season with permissive education. And don't forget the toys...
How would a kid with anything except amazing and wise parents even
be able to navigate this crazy mixture of messages?
Another thing that scares me is children's constant need to be
entertained. Many of my best moments as a kid (only child at that) were
doing creative projects with scraps, doing art and music, and reading.
It seems to me that one of the tasks of childhood should be to get
to know yourself when bored. Out the boredom can come some amazing
ingenuity.
Bill Cosby's new book has a few gems about the "gimme" generation
which should appeal to anyone who has ever spent even a few minutes
in the presence of little people.
Reactionary as it sounds, it's the culture and the values that scare
me the most. It's kids buying into the images that they are sold
but do not know that they are sold by Madison Avenue. It's a whole
generation of kids who think that looking, talking, and acting like
hoods is the highest possible achievement. All that scares me,
but any possible solutions along this line are even scarier, so
I mostly keep my mouth shut.
And I can't sign off without mentioning all the truly wonderful
and lovable kids I have met--somehow they are managing to find their
way in a much more difficult world than I had to navigate. More
power to them and their folks, and may *they* become the role models
for the others!
|
156.4 | Kids..Innocent as the day is long | RANCHO::RAH | Stastny Novy Rok | Tue Dec 30 1986 22:25 | 11 |
| Every generation has has spoiled kids. We have more because
theres more stress in modern life and so adults fail to spent
the necessary time to offer guidance. Also, kids are just plain
unfashionable what with everyone's mind on cars, clothes, etc.
I see the hostility they recieve from most adults they run into.
Small wonder they cordially return the favor by steal cars, being
pests, and painting their hair orange. The yuppies forget that
they were once smelly, gassy little blobs too. No, maybe they
deserve a planet of their own where their short carefree years
can be spent learning and having fun, in the company of those
who love them.
|
156.5 | kids CAN be ok | DEBET::CLARISSA | KRIS | Wed Dec 31 1986 00:27 | 14 |
| I have often told everyone that I may like individual children but
that I hate kids, as a group. It's still true. I want a kid or two
someday, but I only decided this after my mother convinced me that
I would raise the children as reasonable humans, not the horrible
examples that are too prevalent today.
I tend to think it's parents not giving the kids enough attention
of the right kind. I have a friend who has a 7 year old boy and
he is a sweet kid with horrible manners. All her friends take turns
teaching him how to behave in restaurants, how to be polite, etc.
because she won't take the time. I only hope his having multiple
mothers works out.
kris
|
156.6 | And who produced these little monsters? | HPSCAD::WALL | I see the middle kingdom... | Wed Dec 31 1986 08:33 | 9 |
|
At the risk of calling the fires down upon me, I would say that
modern parents, not modern children, are the problem.
To answer the question, no, I don't like being around children.
I did not like being a child, and spent most of my childhood with
my nose in a book to get away from it.
DFW
|
156.7 | Personally speaking... | JUNIOR::TASSONE | Cat, s'up? | Wed Dec 31 1986 08:52 | 32 |
| No, not really. I want to have children some day but like someone
else said, I don't really like children as a group but there are
certainly some well behaved little exceptions: my little nephew
Jeffrey. Although very biased, he is by far the most polite 3 year
old I have known today. He thanks me after every glass of milk
and even says "God bless you" after I sneeze (I sneeze alot).
But, I will share something honest with all of you. I really don't
care for my other two nephews that much. Oh, I am "blood" and I
feel bonding but they are the most arrogant, inconsiderate, impolite,
selfish children that I have ever known. My sister is at fault
and her husband has a lot to do with it because both parents let
the boys do whatever they want. So, each time I babysit for them,
I end up adopting the rules of their "mother" because I know it
wouldn't do me any good to change things now (how could I, she's
with them more and her rules (ahem!) are followed by them). Oh,
the 7 year old says, "my mother let's me do this". I asked mom
about jumping off the spiral staircase on to the livingroom couch
and she said no. Ok, so I'm going on an on. The point: the parents
AND the school, the media, the celebrities, the toys and what have
you have a great impact on the personality/behavior of today's
children.
Personally, I'm glad I grew up when I did (Ne 61). I wouldn't want
to be a teenager today, that's for sure. Too rude, loud and yes,
some of these kids would rather watch MTV than learn! I for one
loved school and right now, I wish I could have learned more.
One last thing my 21 year old sister said to me: "I want
what I want because I deserve it". When did this all happen I'd like
to know.
|
156.8 | Who raised them? | AKOV04::WILLIAMS | | Wed Dec 31 1986 09:15 | 5 |
| Much of what is being said against today's children in this collection
of replies was said against the writers not too many years ago.
Kids are a true pain in the arse (8 nephews and neices, 2 grand
children) today but they didn't raise themselves!
|
156.9 | Babies | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | Never believe anything until it's been officially denied | Wed Dec 31 1986 09:33 | 20 |
| I know some unruly kids, but I also know some that I don't mind
being around, for at least a short time.
I pretty much agree with .0. I hate going to a restaurant or theatre,
and have someone's angel crawling all over me, making so much noise
that I can't hear anything else, running, screaming, the list goes
on. However, I also am not fond of babies. I don't understand
why so many people, especially women, want to hold and coo over
every new baby they meet. I usually run the other way when I see
someone coming with a baby - as they usually think *I* have a problem
when I don't want to hold their baby. What is so cute about them,
anyway? They don't even have a personality yet - just cry, eat,
sleep, burp, and mess up diapers.
Now mind you, I have nothing against people who want children having
them. I wish the best for every child. But please, not too close
to me.
Elizabeth
|
156.10 | Good Kids are Great | PSYCHE::DECAROLIS | | Wed Dec 31 1986 10:29 | 19 |
|
I think the brattiness found in kids today can be attributed
to the high divorce rate. Single mothers with kids, especially
those that are working, don't have the energy to discipline
and will let the kid do what he/she wants for sake of peace.
While shopping at the Pheasant Run Mall recently, an 8 year old
boy came up to me, smiled at me, and then wound up and punched
me in the stomach. And delivered quite a wallop too, I might
add. Why did he do this??? His father probably lets him practice
his shots on Dad's stomach all the time.....this is the only
reasoning I have for that type of behavior.
Some people may disagree, but I say, spare the child....smack
the parent.
Jeanne
|
156.11 | [..yawn] | TOPDOC::SLOANE | Bruce is on the loose | Wed Dec 31 1986 10:50 | 14 |
| Children today are no better and no worse than they ever have been.
There have always been well behaved children, and there have always
been brats. There have always been parents who controlled their
children, and there have always been parents who did not control
their children.
Some people have always disliked having children around, and
some people haven't. Some people want to have children of their
own, and some don't.
So what else is new?
-bs
|
156.12 | Each an Individual | CSC32::JOHNS | | Wed Dec 31 1986 11:18 | 23 |
| I agree with many of the noters here. Some children are terrific,
some are holy terrors. My mother was an assistant principal of
my high school (and later the principal). She told me that her
opinion of what was wrong with kids today (1970's) was that so many
parents were afraid to discipline. They thought the kids would
not think their parents loved them if the parents disciplined them.
In fact, according to what the kids told my mom, the kids thought
the parents DIDN'T love them because they DIDN'T discipline them.
The kids interpreted this as the parents not caring.
I don't think the kids are really much worse than before. Every
generation has had the older generation complain about them. I
know my father was a little turd when he was young. I also remember
the hurt and indignance I felt when I read or heard how "kids today"
were rotten, inconsiderate, irresponsible, etc. I was a good kid,
and I knew many other good kids, and felt we were being misunderstood
because good kids seldom get in the paper or on TV compared to "bad"
kids.
I'm rambling, too. Let's hope that we can have some positive influence
on the children with whom we come in contact.
Carol
|
156.13 | It depends... | CURIE::BYRNE | The Red Menace | Wed Dec 31 1986 11:52 | 4 |
| I only enjoy being around disciplined, well-behaved children. But then
I only enjoy being around disciplined, well-behaved adults.
Eileen
|
156.14 | ONLY THE GOOD ONES | FDCV13::KNORR | | Wed Dec 31 1986 12:32 | 20 |
| I like kids (I don't have any of my own) my sister kids are typical
they fight with each other (there are 3 of them) and say rude things
mostly to each other. I consider her a very good Mother she
disciplines them, but she can't control everything thing they said.
She can only set an example the hope they follow it. I do agree
with most of you I don't like kids that are spoiled by their parents.
My girlfriend's neighbor came over Christmas Eve with her two little
girls and the two year I wanted to strangle. She climbed all over
her mother and ended every sentence with MINE.. She screamed if
she didn't get her way. I am very good with kids (I don't put
up with anything - beleive me) noticing this the woman asked if
I babysit... I answered quickly with NO!!!!
Have a Happy New Year!!!
Pam
|
156.15 | yes, only the good ones | CLT::DADDAMIO | Equine Stable Engineer | Wed Dec 31 1986 13:44 | 30 |
| As I read this note and replies I am looking forward(?) to a visit
from my niece and nephew tomorrow (they'll be here for 3 days).
Fortunately grandma and grandpa will be with them to keep them in
line a little. I like them and they are basically good kids (very
irresponsible however), but it sure is nice when they leave.
They seemed to have picked up most bad habits from their mother.
Their father (my husband's brother) remarried this year to a woman
who has better manners, more class, etc. and hopefully they will
be able to change some of the kids habits since the kids are living
with them.
I know I wasn't a perfect child - fought with my brothers a lot,
but we were good away from home and when other people were around.
I definitely think children were disciplined more back then (50's-60's)
than they are today. I remember the principal being able to hit
kids in grammar school.
Several of my friends have had babies this year (I have yet to hold
any of them - like other noters, I don't see what the attraction
is) and it will be interesting to see how they raise them. One
took her baby to a restaurant recently - said she heard people moan
when they walked in. But the baby made no noise and she had people
come up to her and say how well behaved the baby was. Hope the
kid stays well-behaved.
Guess I agree with most of the noters on only liking to be around
good kids, but not being around any is fine with me too.
Jan
|
156.16 | Some single parent households are O.K! | PEACHS::WOOD | | Wed Dec 31 1986 13:47 | 25 |
|
I, too, agree with most of what has been said here so far.
I do not tolerate *other people's* children well at all. I have
some close friends who are parents of my daughters friend and they
spend very little time with her. Whenever I am over there she is
in her room and only comes out to eat. (She's 14). I feel if they
tried to include her more in their activities she'd be a better
behaved child. (She has taken things from my home when visiting
and cuts school frequently without her parents knowledge.
I do have to take argument with the comment (.10) that the
cause of such behavior as we see today is single parents. I have
raised both my daughters alone for the past 12 years and they are
no trouble at all! They are well mannered, know how to behave in
public, not into "hard rock"/drugs, etc. etc. etc. This is not
just my opinion but the opinion of teachers / friends / people at
public places who observe their behavior. In some ways I think
they are *better* behaved because of being brought up in a single-
parent environment. They *had* to be more responsible and mature
more quickly than their friend (mentioned above) who never has to
do chores around the house or anything.
I agree parents are usually the problem (as I believe my friends
are at fault and they are a married couple; both working!)
|
156.17 | My sister's kids are terrible | JUNIOR::TASSONE | Cat, s'up? | Wed Dec 31 1986 14:13 | 30 |
| I shouldn't keep putting my sister down but I can't help but feel
that her "problems" have affected the behavior of her two sons.
I really can't take being around them. This Christmas, they each
got over $500 in gifts (from their parents alone) and when Mark,
the 7 year old, came over to my mothers and only got 4 gifts (one
of which was CLOTHES), he said to my other sister, "I didn't
get any gifts". This same sister told him, "What an ingrateful little kid"
and his mother just laughed. She laughed. How can she laugh?
She does nothing to discipline him. He is the type of kid that
is very curious (I can't blame him, I am too). But, I don't break
apart toys to see "what makes them work". And, they are not HIS
toys. That's the younger son.
The 9 year old is very money hungry. Ok, so they have money. Their
father is a millionair (business assets, but close to that in personal
assets). He said, "you know why I liked my First Holy Communion
Party? Because I got so much money". He said about $400 (it was
close to a $1000). When I told him that my little niece got about
$700 for her Baptism, he said, "Oh, yea, I got $800. I forgot".
This child is trying to immitate his father who has to "beat the
Jones' on every count".
Yes, I'm flaming, it isn't my problem but I want you to know that
MONEY has had a big effect on their behavior 'cause if they didn't
have soooo much money around, they would value "a toy" and "clothes"
instead of saying, when something breaks, "that's alright, my mother
will buy me a new one". That was a $40 toy truck.
I'll pass with that philosophy anyday. And babysitting those boys
ever again, that's for sure.
|
156.18 | the fault is shared | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Wed Dec 31 1986 14:20 | 19 |
| Some of the blame for "rotten children" has to rest with the children
themselves, too, especially when they get to be teenagers or beyond,
not just their parents.
One family who lived a couple of houses down from where I grew up
had two daughters and a son. The oldest daughter was a year older
then I. She was a quiet, pretty, smart, polite child. I think
she eventually became a fashion model someplace. Their son is my
age. He was a quiet, handsome, smart, studious kid, who also was
a track star in high school. I believe he is coaching track at
a high school somewhere in the midwest now (my mother would know;
I haven't seen these people in some years now, and the son did not
attend our last high school class reunion). The other daughter
is my brother's age (three years younger than I am). She was always
a terror, causing trouble of one sort after another, a lot of to
deliberately annoy her mother (a very nice lady who played cello
in my mother's string quartet). She still is. And yet they were
all raised in the same family. And the youngest daughter is now
over thirty, certainly old enough to know better than to be a terror.
|
156.19 | Working Moms | SSDEVO::YOUNGER | Never believe anything until it's been officially denied | Wed Dec 31 1986 14:41 | 13 |
| RE: .10:
>Single mothers with kids, especially those that are working, don't
>have the energy to disciplin.
Same can be said in families where both parents are working. I
do recognize that some people can handle the "super Mom" (or Dad)
situation, but raising children and holding a job takes a lot of
effort.
Elizabeth
|
156.20 | | ULTRA::GUGEL | Simplicity is Elegance | Wed Dec 31 1986 15:26 | 9 |
| re .18
You don't know exactly what that family's situation was. Could
be that the parents favored the other two kids over the third and
she, the "terror", was trying to get attention somehow. I've seen
other kids do it and I should know. I was that way when I was a
teenager.
-Ellen
|
156.21 | what to do with boredom | CELICA::QUIRIY | Christine | Wed Dec 31 1986 15:34 | 8 |
|
Re: .3,
Your statement that "...one of the tasks of childhood should be to get to know
yourself when bored. Out the boredom can come some amazing ingenuity...." is
absolutely brilliant. Not a bad idea for adults, either.
CQ
|
156.22 | | BLIMP::ANDY_LESLIE | | Wed Dec 31 1986 18:38 | 14 |
|
Rude people are anathema to me, no matter what their age.
My brother believed his kids had the right attitudes. They never
said "please", "thank you", or observed any of the social niceties,
like eating with guests. They also were allowed to stay up in the
evenings until they decided to go to bed. 1 am bedtimes for 4 year
olds?
When we had our children, our FIRST resolve was to instill some
realistic moral and social values - such as "please" and "thank you". I
may be harping on this, but those phrases, sincerely meant, are part of
social acceptability. They also make people feel good when they
give Christmas presents, for example.
|
156.23 | | CADSYS::SULLIVAN | Karen - 225-4096 | Thu Jan 01 1987 13:28 | 22 |
| RE: .19
> RE: .10:
>
> >Single mothers with kids, especially those that are working, don't
> >have the energy to disciplin.
>
> Same can be said in families where both parents are working. I
> do recognize that some people can handle the "super Mom" (or Dad)
> situation, but raising children and holding a job takes a lot of
> effort.
Wouldn't it be nice to be able to point to a situation and say
"Ah Ha! That's the reason!"? I've met lots of kids whose parents
are in lots of different situations, some traditional (Mom stays home
dad works), some both work, some single parents and even where Dad stays
home, Mom works. It takes a lot of work no matter what situation, and
you have to point to the upbringing as well as the child's characteristics.
It really has nothing to do with what the working situation is (though
some may use that as an excuse).
...Karen
|
156.25 | I made a "different sort of deal" with my son..... | NEXUS::CONLON | Persistent dreamer... | Thu Jan 01 1987 16:14 | 64 |
| RE: -1
Was it respect or fear? When I was a child, I
never *DARED* to talk back to my parents (and my parents
were never able *ONCE* to admit to their children that
they could ever be WRONG about anything.) Perhaps they
felt that such an admission would show a sign of weakness
to us that would undermine their authority.
Not that they weren't also quite LOVING at the same
time, mind you. It was just that they also held STRICT
and ABSOLUTE CONTROL over us as well.
When I had my son, I made up my mind that I would not
set myself up to him in the same way. I've always been
open with him about the fact that I make mistakes (and am
not too proud to apologize to him when an apology is due
him.)
My feeling was (from the beginning) that if ANYONE in
the world should be subject to his noise, his messes, his
wild behavior, and his annoying childishness -- it should
be me (as his Mother.) Therefore, I made it my policy that
he had the freedom to create noise and havoc in our home
(when we were there alone together) -- but he was *NOT*
to inflict his noise, etc. on other people (not in public
and not at their homes.)
When we went shopping, he was told from a very early
age that if he "begged" for toys or "acted up" in ANY WAY
WHATSOEVER, the guaranteed result would be that I would
not spend a single cent on him. If he behaved perfectly,
I *still* might not spend a single cent on him (but at least
the possibilities were still open.)
Since he was always fairly free to run wild while alone
with me, he never seemed to feel the need to do it in public.
(At 16 years old, he is still quite conscious of his behavior
with adults in my presence.) We often get invited to small
adult parties together (and other informal evenings at friends'
homes) -- he handles himself very well. He's fairly quiet,
but can engage in adult conversations (and plays Trivial
Pursuit fairly well, too!)
We spent Thanksgiving at the home of some friends from
DEC (there was another adult guest there as well from DEC.)
We had a great time. When we got home, Ryan asked me, "Was
I a pest?" (He wasn't!!) But I thought it was wonderful
that he was concerned enough to ask if his behavior had
been acceptable.
Meanwhile, at home, he still makes a sizable racket
and has annoying habits that only I get to see. (That's
OK with me!) I'm still his Mom -- when I gave birth to
him, I accepted the whole ball of wax: his messy diapers,
his throwing up, his food on the floor, his noise, his tears,
his anger, and a whole lot of his *LOVE*!
People out in public did not make that commitment to
him, so there's no reason why they should be forced to endure
the "less endearing aspects" of his childhood -- for the
most part, they haven't had to with my son.
Suzanne...
|
156.26 | Explaining our capitalist system to a fella in a diaper... | NEXUS::CONLON | Persistent dreamer... | Thu Jan 01 1987 16:48 | 62 |
| There's one story I wanted to tell about how
I "cured" my son of the tendency that most toddlers
have of grabbing things and yelling "MINE!"
He was 18 months old at the time and we were in
a drug store at a mall in Honoulu. We were cruising
through the toy section and Ryan found some little thing
that he wanted. He picked it up and said "Mine!" (Not
in an extremely loud way, just as a statement of fact.)
I went down to his level and pulled the toy away
from him (telling him that the toy was NOT Ryan's until
Ryan paid for it!!) I gave him a $5 bill and walked him
over near the line for the cashier.
I gave him back the toy and told him to stand in line
and wait for his turn. When he reached the lady behind
the counter, he was to give her both the toy and the money.
She would give him back the toy in a bag (and give him some
other money back as well.) He had gone shopping with me
enough times that it wasn't a totally foreign ritual to
him (he had just never done it alone before.)
I pushed him (by himself) toward the line with his
toy and his money. (Then I hid nearby where I could watch
what happened without his being aware of me.)
When his turn came, he reached up to the woman behind
the counter (to hand over his toy and his money.) She looked
down at him (he could barely see over the edge of the cashier's
counter.) She looked in front of him and then behind him
to see who he "belonged" to. Everyone shook their heads
(to say that he wasn't *their* child.)
She looked back at Ryan (seeming to be a bit confused
to find a paying customer in the form of an 18 month old
baby.) But after a few seconds, she decided that the transac-
tion was a valid one -- even if her little customer *WAS*
wearing only a T-shirt and a diaper.
The funny thing is that she proceeded totally normally
at that point. She looked down at him in a business-like
way and asked, "Will that be all?" Ryan, of course, just
looked back at her in silence. (He didn't understand the
question.) :-)
She handed him his toy in a little bag and he reached
out with his other hand to accept the other money that she
gave back. Then he just walked on through the stall (where
I caught up to him.) No problem at all!
After that, he understood what the situation was with
"possessions" (and knew that nothing could be "HIS" without
an exchange of the green paper that his Mother carried.)
We next went through an agreement on what was required (in
the way of behavior) from *HIM* in order to get me to part
with my precious green paper in exchange for a toy.
He was never a problem in stores once he understood
what the deal was.
Suzanne...
|
156.28 | I sassed my dad but got yelled at! | YAZOO::B_REINKE | Down with bench Biology | Sat Jan 03 1987 22:34 | 39 |
|
My generation, or actually those growing up 2 - 7 years after
me were supposed to be the "worst generation ever" at the time.
They refused to be drafted, protested almost everything, dropped
out of school, listened to rock'n'roll, took up civil rights (probably
communist you know!) used drugs, invented sex, let their hair grow
long etc. etc!!! And it was all the result of permissiveness, Dr.
Spock, the bomb, etc. etc. etc. Now we are come to a second or third
generation from my own and it is equally being touted as the "worst".
To me it seems like it is a tale that repeats every generation,
and seems the "worst" to those who are parents at the time.
I vowed that I would listen to my kids, and let them argue back.
Neither my husband nor I are the firm disciplinarians our parents
were. Like Suzanne we will appologize when we are wrong,and allow
our children to have and express their own points of view.
And we have paid for this. Our kids do not obey instantly and they
argue back rather than blindly accepting our word, and they can
argue me into a corner and I have to be careful not to make statements,
I can't support, and some times we have real problems with enforceing
politeness and respect.
BUT - they behave well in public, care for other people, are good
students, have a strong sense of family loyality, and can be relied
on. It may be harder to raise kids when they don't jump like I did
for my father, but you can do it. and I just proof read my oldest
son's college application, and read his essay about the person who
was his hero - he described his father, and appologized that he
couldn't include me as well, and I also read a teen mag quiz that
my thirteen year old daughter took on honesty and found (to no
surprise)that she scored in the bottom third on honesty.
So there are good times and bad times. But I believe that if you love your
you can enforce rules with them and raise them to be decent people
if you try, tho it certainly isn't easy.
Bonnie
|
156.30 | no excuses | ADVAX::ENO | Bright Eyes | Mon Jan 05 1987 10:33 | 30 |
| Re: the original question
I don't like ALL children, any more than I like ALL adults.
My husband's twelve-year old niece said something very rude to him
once in a public situation (we were at a dinner party), a personal
remark that was extremely critical. He snapped at her (essentially
telling her that it was none of her business), but then had a huge
fight with his sister about his "critizing her children's behavior".
What a mess! This is a parent who insists on treating her children
like adults (taking them to adult cocktail parties they *weren't*
invited to, etc.), but won't tolerate anyone treating them that
way. I have a real problem with this.
My parents (as I can recall) expected just about as much from me
in the way of disciplined behavior as I could give them; i.e. they
didn't expect a four-year old to have perfect table manners, but
they did expect me not to throw my food!! I learned self-discipline
(there is no other kind that is worth anything) by being taught
mostly by example that there are rules that made our family work.
That meant there was no point in my complaining about washing dishes
or making my bed; I had to do those in the same way that my Mom
and Dad had to go to work each day. It was a fact of life. And
you can't teach that to someone when they are five-years-old; it
has to be learned "in the cradle".
We weren't PERFECT children by any means, but we never had the
misconception that being children excused us from bad behavior.
G
|
156.32 | I'm not sure but perhaps | STUBBI::B_REINKE | Down with bench Biology | Mon Jan 05 1987 11:33 | 20 |
| re .29
Kerry,
We do have rules in our family about courtesty and politeness,
and our kids are punished if they break them, for example they
could be sent to their room (no steros or tvs there either!) or
haul X number of logs for the furnace.
But by allowing our kids to be free to question and speak their
own minds we also get kids who answer back and are rude to us
sometimes. Yes it is a problem, and one we are continually dealing
with. But in the long run I'd rather that, that kids who are afraid
to object but rebel in secret.
We behave differently to our spouses/so's what ever, than we do
to the general public also. Are we freer to express our minds,
get angry etc. with those who we trust perhaps?
Bonnie
|
156.34 | No | CSSE::CICCOLINI | | Mon Jan 05 1987 12:27 | 1 |
| I never know what to talk about.
|
156.35 | being liberal doesn't mean no punishments | TWEED::B_REINKE | Down with bench Biology | Mon Jan 05 1987 12:49 | 5 |
| My personal opinion is that parents who make threats and don't
follow through with punishment are idiots and may well be
producing kids who misbehave like the ones described here.
Punishment doesn't have to be physical, however, and I have
seen members of both sexes respond in this (ineffectual) way.
|
156.36 | pleasantly surprised | CLT::DADDAMIO | Equine Stable Engineer | Mon Jan 05 1987 13:13 | 22 |
| Follow up on .15
I had a pleasant surprise this past weekend when my niece and nephew
came to visit. They have been living with my brother-in-law and
his new wife for 4 months now and the change is really amazing.
They now have rules (written up and posted on the refrigerator)
at home, and the rules also apply to anywhere they are. For the
first time the house was not littered with their toys and garbage
(e.g. banana peels in the middle of the living room floor, apple
cores on the coffee table, etc). It sure was nice not having to
clean up after them or get them to clean up after themselves.
They are learning more respect for other people's property, too.
If they used anything of ours, it was returned to it's place
immediately after use (last time they were here they forgot where
they left things of ours and everyone had to search for them).
Couldn't resist putting this in to show that some "not so great"
kids can learn to behave better without too much hassle.
Jan
|
156.38 | | WHOARU::HARDING | | Mon Jan 05 1987 13:26 | 24 |
| I did not read through all the replys to see if this answer
was here, scanning through here didn't show anything.
- So - here it goes.
I have two children, but I also feel unfortable around other
peoples children.
Re:0 I assume by your input that you have only one child, I have
two. Some times they get along together so well you wouldn't know
they were around. Other times they can't be be in the same house
with out trying to kill each other. I can also take one or the
other shopping or what ever and have a great time. Having only
one child tends to give one a distorted view.
*Modern* children are brought up by *modern* parents.
One of the excuses that a friend of ours gives for their childrens
behavor is that its a phase their going through. Their children
have been going through phases of one sort or another for 12 years.
dave <who would like to continue this but got to go>
.
|
156.39 | Discipline/punishment | ADVAX::ENO | Bright Eyes | Mon Jan 05 1987 14:39 | 19 |
| re .33
I have a friend who does the same yelling routine. The USUAL way
she addresses her children is a bellow, so she shouldn't be surprised
when they don't react.
I have a concern about the way the word "discipline" is being bandied
about. Admittedly one definition (and the most commonly accepted
one) is "punishment used to obtain desired behavior". But a broader
definition includes the concept of developing a set of rules and
training a child to live within them. Too many parents think
"discipline" is something that comes after the fact of bad behavior,
instead of something that should be learned prior to the fact of
ANY behavior.
Rather an idealistic way of looking at things, I guess, but I can't
help myself
Gloria
|
156.40 | R*E*S*P*C*T and others rights! | WATNEY::SPARROW | You want me to do what?? | Mon Jan 05 1987 15:50 | 30 |
|
dave,
I do have one child, I can see where more than one would be a harder
issue to deal with without respect for others. I was raised in
a family of 6 children. We argued and fought too, but without
screaming and bodily harm. A disagreement between sibilings that
is loud and physical is not only infringing on the rights of the
participants, but anyone in the vacinity. If the situation calls
for anger, I don't think there is a problem with expressing that
anger in a nonviolent manner without shouting. It becomes harder
in later life for a child who has always been allowed to express
themselves without self control to accept that same behavior not
being acceptable anywhere else in the world. (did that come out
right???) It seems to me that what is learned in childhood as
acceptable, nonrespect, screaming violent behavior, constant
questioning and argueing on boring chores, could and will create
unrealistic expectations of what they can get away with in normal
work or life situations. I can't see myself being around many of
todays children when they are adults. They would not be able to
accept constructive critisism, deal with frustrations without harming
themselves or anyone close by, or carry on a rational discussion
without trying to outscream any opposition. I still think it boils
down to respect of others. If they are brought up to feel that
their rights come before anyone elses, the selfish results are very
scary. I feel sorry for any parent who has to constantly justify
every request made. Children have rights too, but we as parents
have to make sure that their rights do not infringe on the rights
of anyone around them, in public or private.
vivian
|
156.41 | children is not a generic category | MTV::HENDRICKS | Holly | Mon Jan 05 1987 16:19 | 60 |
| Just as with adult friends, I think there is a subtle kind of
non-sexual attraction that we have for some children but do not
have for others. Their behavior is a factor, but their personalities
and interests also enter in.
When I was little, adults felt free to set limits --
-It's the adults time to (talk, eat, have the living room)
-The grownups are going to have a conversation. The children can
stay if they are quiet and want to listen, but will have to leave
if they disrupt it.
-Tomorrow we will go to the zoo, tonight you have to let Mom and
Dad talk quietly.
-We have played with you all day, now it's time for you to do something
on your own.
...
My friends and I didn't question their right to do this! It happened
in everyone's home, and we respected it. (I'm sure I complained,
but I complained knowing that I would lose!)
One of my pet peeves is children who expect undivided adult attention.
(I'm not talking about a sick child or a child in pain.)
I have been around children and their parents where the children
had the right to interrupt, raise hell, and nag their parents to
leave until the parents did so. The children knew that they had
the control. I hate being with people whose children are like this.
If I go to spend an hour with a friend, I expect her to set some
limits with her kids during that hour. And another time we will
do something that includes the children, because I like them too,
but sometimes I want to have a conversation with their mom where
two consecutive thoughts are possible!
I think that kids who have (and expect) this kind of attention and
control make themselves very unpopular with other adults. I can
imagine other adults not wanting to see their parents unless the
children are asleep or away! Who does this benefit? It seems
better to me to set limits, and be welcome!
I was an only child, and I had my moments of being a holy terror.
I remember, though, that we used to visit my parents' adult friends
where there were no children in the house. On those occasions my
mom and I would pack a toy/book bag for me to take along. That
made such a difference, and allowed me to have a resource when things
got boring as they always did. I was too little to know that I
needed to plan ahead for things like that. Yet I've heard friends
of mine ask very young children to get their things together for
an event like that. Sometimes the kids just fall apart--especially
if they don't have enough of a handle on time yet to help them
understand a contingency plan!
This kind of philosophizing is easy enough for a non-parent...I
really do admire all of you who do it day in and day out. What
an amazing commitment. I get edgy making a commitment to a project
that will take me one year!
|
156.42 | Little creatures of love | ULTRA::ZURKO | Security is not pretty | Tue Jan 06 1987 12:23 | 37 |
| Whew! Finally made it through the whole darn topic. There was a
net discussion on something like this right before the holidays,
and it really helped me. Basically, I never cared much for kids.
When I was one, I didn't feel like "one of them" (I felt like a
child, but not like I was a peer with other children). I never caught
on to how to interact with one. I never could tell if there were
things we would both enjoy doing/talking about. Holidays are the
only time this matters. I do believe children are important to the
future, so why can't I interact with them in a positive manner?
Well, the woman who initiated the discussion said that she likes
to have her child around her, and that she feels that adults give
a child *less* consideration than they give another adult. That
got me thinking. I pay very close attention to how other adults
are interacting; why couldn't I for kids? No more, and no less.
The long and short of it is, I got along much better with the child
relatives this time around. And felt I enjoyed and benefitted from
it.
Some folks have mentioned not enjoying hold the little blobs. I
have always felt like this too. However, I recently became a godmom.
My friend has been encouraging me to hold Tim any time I'm around.
And I know realize why. Holding the darn kid all the time (which
is what the parents have to do) is tiring, physically and emotionally.
You keep the kid quiet, entertained, and cuddled. It doesn't take
*all* your resources, but some. She's just glad to have someone
give her a break. That, I can deal with.
Someone also mentioned taking apart toys. Granted, kids should never
do that to someone else's toys. Sherry Turkle (at MIT) did a fair
amount of research into computer people and engineers, to figure
out what makes them what they are. One of the things the majority
of engineers did as kids was take things apart and put them back
together. And most engineers had stories of how they caugth h*ll
for taking something apart and not being able to put it together,
when it wasn't theirs.
Mez
|
156.43 | Pack them in a box and feed thru a hole! | RSTS32::TABER | If you can't bite, don't bark! | Tue Jan 06 1987 13:31 | 80 |
| Kids! I don't know what's wrong with these kids today!
Kids! Who can understand anything they say!
Kids! They are disrespectful, disobedient oafs!
?, crazy, sloppy lazy loafers! And while we're on the subject..
Kids! You can talk and talk 'til your face is blue!
Kids! But they still do just want they want to do!!
Why can't they be like we were, perfect in every way...
Well, you get the idea. And that was written in 1961, I believe (no one
test me on it -- I wouldn't risk a paycheck that the date was right)...
Each and every one of you has a very valid point! I can't stand alot of
kids I run into nowadays!!!! I have a nephew I'd just as soon jam into
the trash compactor!! But the other 3 boys are gems! The 2 girls are
as well....
But, you know something?? This is not new.... Remember Mr. Wilson from
DENNIS THE MENACE? Lord, how he hated kids (in general). But Dennis
was loud and obnoxious (at times) and troublesome and curious...
He was occasionally ill-mannered and could justify punching an adult in
the stomach.
And Margaret was so well-mannered to adults, but pure poison to another
kid (and didn't we all DESPISE Margaret?).
Kids are kids. Genetically, they are without manners, boisterous,
and difficult. They're SUPPOSED to be that way!! And even the BEST
parent can't monitor his kid's activities 24 hours a day!! How can
you suppress that energy? It EXPLODES in spontaneity and forgetfulness
and running in the hallway and talking in a restaurant! Good parents
try to help their child LEARN to curb their excesses.... Busy parents
sometimes don't notice, or are more forgiving...
I don't suppose it shows, but I love kids. I love just about anyone's
kids. I love Jon, the 6 year-old destined for a ride in the trash
compactor. I don't LIKE him sometimes, but.... His parents usually
interfere with my ability to reach this kid. He's always been a
difficult child and they pretty much give him anything he wants to
keep peace. Jon doesn't get that from me, but nowadays, I have more
energy than they do.
I guess putting all the socioeconomic issues aside, we have a great deal
in common with these 'monsters' of today.... we were the 'monsters'
of yesterday, and as I remember, there were lots of people around to
grouse at what 'bad kids' we were.
We weren't -- my Dad was strict and 15 whacks with a belt was standard
for not eating your veggies, as it was for bad grades and making noise
outside on a Sunday.
But we were to someone... Poor Mrs. Perrin got her lovely bleeding hearts
shredded with the advent of each Spring (Flowers to give to Mom!).
Elderly Mr. Damiano, who's only
request was that we TELL him the Frisbee went into his garden so he
could get it for us, got an occasional tomato plant trampled because
we were heartsick about bothering the poor guy every 5 minutes when
the Frisbee got away from us. Somehow we didn't worry about his tomato
plants... We didn't KNOW we should worry about his tomato plants -- they're
only weeds... or something!!!
I can get furious at a child for being rude, and I can spank one for
insolence (I have spanking privs with my 6 nieces and nephews because
I'm Number One Babysitter) or nastiness.... but deep down I know it's
all superficial because
they're just kids!!!!
They're not small adults..... And I have a hard time with holding them
all responsible for each other...
And as for parents, I'll pass judgement on them AFTER I've been driven
to tears of fury by a child who won't potty train, or had a child
who is hyperactive 24 hours a day, or screams "NO!" at me constantly.
My turn is coming.... I need my cool....
Karen
|
156.44 | .43 applause, applause | YAZOO::B_REINKE | Down with bench Biology | Tue Jan 06 1987 15:22 | 1 |
|
|
156.45 | Kids?Kids! | ESPN::HENDRICKS | Holly | Wed Jan 07 1987 09:01 | 3 |
| One my my greatest pleasures was watching my fifth and sixth graders
put on a production of Bye Bye Birdie and sing that song "Kids!".
I hoped they appreciated the ironies...
|
156.46 | some do | YAZOO::B_REINKE | Down with bench Biology | Wed Jan 07 1987 09:08 | 2 |
| My oldest son played the father in Bye Bye Birdie last year and
very much enjoyed the ironies of the song as he sang it!
|
156.47 | >- RE: .43 -< | SWSNOD::RPGDOC | Dennis the Menace | Wed Jan 07 1987 15:09 | 9 |
|
I OBJECT TO BEING CALLED LOUD AND OBNOXIOUS
...but not enough to justify punching you in the stomach.
|
156.48 | 38 going on 12 | COGVAX::LEEDBERG | | Sun Jan 11 1987 12:23 | 13 |
|
(I will try this again.)
I have a soft spot in my heart for the Brats of the world - for
I was (am) one.
Both of my children have been terrible and wonderful. If they turn
out wonderful it will be in spite of me and society's best intentions.
I have hope in the future because of the children and can stand
even the "sweetest" of them most of the time.
_peggy
|
156.50 | | MRMFG1::C_ROBERTS | | Tue Jan 20 1987 15:49 | 14 |
|
I found it difficult to take my son out to eat when he was in the
"just learning to eat stage" children have to explore. Now he is
21 months old and is no problem to me or others, I can only hope
he stays this way.
re.0
I suggest that if you want a nice dinner out with your daughter
you stay away from Family Restaurents.
Let us not forget that we were once children and not as perfect
as some wished us to be, but thats life.
Cathy
|
156.51 | It Could Be You Next... | TOPDOC::STANTON | I got a gal in Kalamazoo | Wed Jan 21 1987 01:33 | 18 |
|
Frankly kids eating out at any age can end up being either
a laugh-riot or a nightmare. I try to opt for the laughs
when I can. Best example: my son (4) accidentally hits fork
in crowded pancake house during breakfast. Fork tumbles upward
into air & now becomes dangerous projectile. Dad lunges, spills
hot coffee, cries out in pain, catches fork, saves child, but
draws 100 stares. Dad hands fork to son & sez "Keep practicing."
Our daughter (1) wears her food. We call it "moussing" and on
occasion help her style her hair into an Alf-Alfa like spike.
We could get bent out of shape but it would do no good.
As for other children, we reserve judgement only because it
could be us the next time. The darling little time bomb might
decide to grab a high note & hold it for 3 hours in a super-
market or a mall, & the more you fuss the louder it gets. We
take pity on the parents of small children...
|
156.52 | Children should be seen and not heard! | CSSE32::PHILPOTT | CSSE/Lang. & Tools, ZK02-1/N71 | Wed Jan 21 1987 08:51 | 13 |
| When I was of pre-school age my parents did not take me to restaurants:
it simply was not "the form". If we were staying in a hotel I ate in
my room (with my nanny).
Once school (boarding school) had instilled proper manners in me, I
was allowed to accompany my parents to restaurants...
/. Ian .\
PS a previous note said "I have a soft spot for children" -- so do I,
it's a bog in Killarny
|
156.53 | | COGVAX::LEEDBERG | | Wed Jan 21 1987 10:17 | 12 |
|
Sometimes my soft spot is on the moon. :^)
But over all I do try to remember what I was like as a child
and respond to troublesome children as I would have like to be
treated.
"Big Green Mother from Outer Space."
_peggy
|
156.54 | One single Parent doing right | VIDEO::WEAVER | | Wed Jan 21 1987 12:43 | 25 |
| I personally like kids, good or bad just like adults. kids like
adults have degrees of moods and behavior patterns.
RE .10 in regards to Single mothers not having enough energy to
discipline kits due to that fact that they work thus creating
brattiness in kids of today.
Personally as a single parent "FLAME ON" I getting sick and tired
of hearing the problems of the kids behaviors attributed to the
fact that they are raised in single family households. Not all
single family households produce deviant kids (sp?)... I for one
have raised my son (13yrs old) alone for 10 years and he is and
has always been very well disciplined. Not only is he a joy to
be around (this is from other people) but he's also extremely bright.
He's recieved 90% scholarship to one of the best privates schools
in the area as well as other Very Private schools who are very anxious
to have him attend their schools as well. He's opt to stay at the
present school thur high school. He knows what he wants to be and
is aiming for it.
This is only one example, There are many more which I wont bother
to list of other Single Parents raising their kids right and also
hell of a lot better than some or many two parent families.
|
156.55 | Quality Parenting | OURVAX::JEFFRIES | | Wed Jan 21 1987 16:02 | 22 |
| There is no clear yes or no. If the child is parented by the new
free expression theory, chances are I won't want to be in their
company. I have had it with parents who feel the child should "express
themselves at all times." Part of parenting is to discipline (not
punish) our children. Definition of discipline--Training intended
to produce a specified character or pattern of behavior. I do not
enjoy going to a resturant, supermarket, church, or any other public
place to be annoyed by some totally undiscipline child, while the
parent stands by with that (isn't she/he cute smile).
These same parents must think the public is really stupid if they
think that when we see one of the screaming tantrums, that we believe
this is the first time it has happened. The child has to be taught
that certain behavior is acceptable.
I have also been in the company of some delightful children.
Unfortunatly there have been fewer of these.
I am a single parent and have been for over 18 years. It is not
the number of parents it's the quality of parenting that is important.
My children are young adults now, but they have always complimented
on there behavior.
|
156.57 | ...REAPIN' WHAT YOU SOW! | MRMFG3::J_FREIDUS | | Wed Jan 28 1987 15:49 | 19 |
| Whew....What a great topic........long, but interesting!
You know its sad to read so many responces from people who just
don't like kids.
I have two sons and I have to be honest, somedays I am so grateful
and full of love for them its a true "blessing"
And some days.....................@##@!*%^&%$#!!!
But thats all part of life.
Believe me, there are some so called "Adults" that are so rude
overbearing and obnoxious - I can't stand to be around
them!!!
A child is born pure, innocent, and blind to the prejudice of mankind.
( and yes they are very demanding little"blobs", again part of life)
Its the parents who should provide the guidance, structure and most
of all LOVE that any child needs. (Even the bratty ones who are
sometime hard to take.)
Re-156.23 really said it all!!
The children of today are the future.....Billy Holiday said it all
"God Bless the child"
|
156.58 | | MRMFG3::J_FREIDUS | | Wed Jan 28 1987 15:52 | 4 |
| DID I SAY 156.23 SORRY,
TRY 156.43!!!!!
|
156.59 | Wanna hold the baby?....etc. | MILRAT::KALLOCK | | Thu Aug 20 1987 14:57 | 22 |
|
I find this topic intriguing and quite complex. My personal feelings
are that my preference for children depends on how I feel about
them as individuals, reacting to them as children, not adults.
I was originally attracted to the topic, and read all the responses
because of the baby/blob issue. I am another one who really dislikes
holding drooling, smelly babies and dislike even more making sounds
and goo-goo talk to them. If the parent said "I've been holding
the baby for the last hour, want to spell me?", I'd be more willing
to take the tyke on out of empathy, but I am annoyed by parents
who insist upon thrusting the little darling into your arms. I
usually talk to them in my usual tone of voice, because I am more
comfortable that way. Then the baby can loosen up and feel me relax.
Personally, if I were a baby, I'd be quite frightened by having
a large head making loud, vaguely animal sounds in my face.
I guess I feel this way about holding babies because as a child
I hated being held and fussed over and kissed. Anyway, just another
viewpoint for this excellent topic.
Ann
|
156.60 | discipline - where has it gone? | GENRAL::KILGORE | Utah Desert Rat misplaced in CO | Wed Jan 13 1988 22:34 | 27 |
| This may sound cold but when we go into restaurants, we ask for
the non-smoking and non-kid section! Even in 'nice' non-family
type resaurants you find kids...it's like you can't get away from
them. And I pity the poor parents with rowdy kids, they usually
look so dragged out and ready to kill (if it was socially acceptable).
When I read this topic, in my mind came two families with kids that
are close friends. One has the 'perfect' kids, no yelling, screaming,
wanting attention. When the parents speak to the kids, there is
no yelling and what is said by the parents, goes...no back-talk.
On the other hand is the exact opposite! You can't get a moments
peace in their house. It's like night and day! And I don't believe
in 'kids are hyperactive and have so much energy'. How does that
explain the 1st family I mentioned. They have got to be the most
relaxed, laid back, happy and loving family (with kids) we know.
Kids have a time and place in my book. When I acted up in public,
I was told to go sit in the car or keep quiet and respect my
surroundings. Too bad there isn't more of that today. <flame on>
But the courts have gotten wacky with letting kids sue parents!
And parents are afraid to touch their kids.<flame off> My parents
occasionally had to spank us or discipline us in some fashion, but
it is like most of the time nowadays, discipline took a back seat
to letting Johnny do his thing. It's sad. (I'm not picking on
all kids, just the misbehaving, noisy brats.) If the shoe fits,
wear it.
|
156.62 | The Strong Willed Child | BARAKA::POGAR | Ann Pogar | Thu Jan 14 1988 10:28 | 31 |
| Well, it's a confusing topic these days (discipline).
I have two children. My oldest is a very strong willed child; my
youngest is easy going. Disciplining the older child requires alot
more energy. My personal philosophy is not to use corporal punishment
(spanking or hitting), which means alot more thought has to go into
her discipline.
She's a great child...will probably be a corporate president someday
(her teacher tells me she demonstrates great leadership qualities!),
but oh...I do get tired some days! Establishing the boundaries and
enforcing them is sometimes a real chore with strong willed children.
She was one of those children that annoyed people in resturants
when she was younger. She'll be 10 years old next month, and it
is considerably different today. We can take her and my son out
in public now and they behave beautifully (this is not always the
case within the confines of our own home though!).
And...there are so many professionals who view raising children
in very different ways. So...you read the different books available
on child rearing...choose the philosophies that seem to set well
with you...do the best you can... and hope they (the children) will
turn out to be responsible adults without hating you (the parents)
for not doing everything correctly.
Just some rambling thoughts from a tired Mom who loves her "strong
willed" and "easy going" children.
ap
|
156.63 | type of discipline doesn't matter | VINO::EVANS | | Thu Jan 14 1988 11:46 | 27 |
| Throughout (well, history, probably) there have been parents who
use corporal punishment and parents who don't. The type of punishment
is irrelevant.
The point is: does the kid have to "pay the price" for acting
unsociably or not. If not, the kid continues to act that way. IT
is *much* easier to threaten ("Do that once more, Griselda, and
you're grounded!") than to actually *ground* the kid and make it
stick. A parent will probably spend 2 hours per day going through
the process of making the grounding stick, in one way or another.
For some people, it is much easier to let the kid get away with
it. Hell, it's *always* easier to let the kid get away with it!
Some parents just realize that the easy way ain't always the best.
(Then, of course, we have the folks who are gonna let the public
schools take care of raising the kid - but that's another story.
And one of my hot buttons. I'll spare you. This time. :-} )
These are the parents whose kids get to 13, 16, 23 and are so
completely unsocialized as to be obnoxious. And the parents look
at you [teacher, social worker, irate fellow diner] and say
"I just can't do *anything* with him/her. Strong-willed, you know."
BULLCOOKIES!
Dawn
|
156.64 | It's all a matter of chemistry... (^; | DPDMAI::RESENDEP | following the yellow brick road... | Thu Jan 14 1988 17:16 | 46 |
| My college roommate got married right after graduation. Her husband
was in the Navy, and they lived all over the world for several years.
About 8 years after graduation, they moved to the town I was then
living in with my then husband. They had two children I had never
seen, a girl 6 and a boy 2. We invited them over to the house, and I
INSISTED (me and my big mouth) that she bring the kids so I could meet
them. She warned me that both of them had been diagnosed as
hyperactive and were real little hellions, and I'd be sorry -- but
noooooo -- I insisted!
Well, those kids proceeded to make every attempt to destroy everything
we had. I'm not talking normal misbehaving; I'm talking destruction.
After the 2-year-old broke a glass by throwing it at his Dad and
hitting my wall, Dad commented "We never TELL our children to do
anything; we ASK them." In that case, I guess I have only myself to
blame because my roommate TOLD me I really didn't want those kids in my
house, and I insisted she bring them. A couple of weeks later, they
reciprocated, and we visited their house. A brand new house. Those
kids had nearly destroyed it. I mean, wallpaper ripped off the wall,
an iron-sized black burn in the carpet -- I couldn't believe people
really lived that way! Needless to say, that was the end of our social
relationship with that family.
I really have only one major pet peeve with other people's kids. My
husband and I have no children. When we invite another couple over to
the house for dinner, I always state their names in the invitation;
e.g., "would you and John like to come over Saturday night?" That's
too subtle for many people. If I'm lucky, they immediately ask "Should
we bring the kids?" I find it uncomfortable to have to explicitly
exclude the children, but I do. When I'm not so lucky, they just show
up with the entire family. If I want the kids to come, I will invite
them. If I don't invite them, then the assumption should be that they
are not invited. Period.
At the risk of sounding too harsh, there ARE children I enjoy being
around. There are two next door, ages 6 and 8, who are welcome
at our house anytime. They come over often to play with our dogs
(but ALWAYS ask permission first), and I can't remember being around
two nicer children.
What makes the difference? Beats me -- I'm not a mother, and my
opinions on child rearing have no credibility whatsoever. All I
know is there are vast differences in the way children behave, and
I don't believe for one minute it's all in their chemistry!
Pat
|
156.66 | Punishment important, not necessarily spanking | GCANYN::TATISTCHEFF | Lee T | Thu Jan 14 1988 18:25 | 17 |
| hmmm
I would disagree with the idea that corporeal punishment is needed
when raising a child. While I am not a mother, my youngest sister
was born when I was 17 and I got to see much of her rearing even
when I had left for college.
She was no more and no less "inately bratty" than most kids, but
her behavior outside the family was excellent (ignoring the one
time she stripped off all her clothes in the supermarket) -- she
would do something wrong like that or a tantrum ONCE, be punished,
and never do it again.
It is _how_ you _apply_ the punishment not what _form_ of punishment
you use.
Lee
|
156.67 | Consistency | BARAKA::POGAR | Ann Pogar | Thu Jan 14 1988 19:07 | 28 |
| I fear I opened a can of worms. To clarify....I do not support
destructive behavior in children. My reference to my child annoying
people in resturants was based on the fact that when she did misbehave,
it did not go unnoticed. She was punished. It was the original
misbehavior that annoyed the diners (and understandably so). I'm also
referring back to a time during the toddler years, when teaching
children 'acceptable' and 'unacceptable' behavior occurs.
Also, I believe it's not only how you apply the punishment, it is
the consistency in which it is applied.
I realize there are those who do not believe there is such a thing
as a "strong willed" child. I, however, do believe in it (having
been in the position to raise one). The parent is "weak" only when
they choose no form of discipline, or remain inconsistent.
Only my thoughts based on my experiences in live. BTW...children
breaking objects or being destructive have possibly little to
do with the innate temperment (personality) of the child...maybe
it has to do with their established boundaries. Perhaps we all agree there
is certain behavior by children (as well as adults) which is deemed
inappropriate and which requires disciplinary action (determined
by each individual family unit).
Oh well...I find myself rambling more and more these days :^)
ap
|
156.68 | | STOKES::WHARTON | | Fri Jan 15 1988 08:50 | 15 |
| I think that there is such a think as a stubborn/strong-willed child.
My sister was one. She is two years older than I but I very vividly
remember the days when we were kids. She was quite distructive, by
that I mean that she use to finds ways and means of bending iron!
Sometimes my mon caught her red-handed and would spank her. Now if my
sister happened to have the iron in her hand, no amount of spanking
would get her to let go of the iron. She would cry and scream but
never let go. At that point what was my mother suppose to do? Beat her
until she was bruised?
In general she was well behaved...
My sister is still this way. She would still stand up for her beliefs
however stupid they may be, and there is little one can do legally
to get her to give in..
|
156.69 | Strong-willed children, corporal punishment, and other thoughts | DPDMAI::RESENDEP | following the yellow brick road... | Fri Jan 15 1988 10:44 | 33 |
| Oh, I don't doubt for a minute that there is such a thing as a
strong-willed child. My sister was like that, and I have thought
many times about the pain my mother must have felt. I've seen my
sister at about age 3 or 4 stand facing my mother with an angry
look on her face and say "Go ahead, hit me, I don't care, I'm not
sorry and nothing you can do will make me sorry." She meant every
word of it. I don't believe any discipline, no matter how severe
(including abuse) would have changed that attitude.
RE corporal punishment. I'm not a mother, so can't speak from
experience. I imagine hitting your child would be a very hard thing to
do. But we were raised WITH corporal punishment. Our home was very
loving, and I have wonderful memories of my mother and father. I never
doubted their love, and, well, if I ever had children I would hope I
could give them as much love as we got. But, that didn't mean we
didn't get spanked. And not just with the hand. The very worst part
of the punishment, far, far worse than the actual whipping, was being
sent into the back yard to fetch a switch. If I brought one back too
small, I was sent back for a larger one. When I produced one that was
satisfactory, Mother proceeded to whip me with it. I can remember
having welts on the back of my legs. While I wasn't exactly thrilled
with it at the time, I now see the value of what she did and feel it
was the right thing to do. In no way would I consider myself an abused
child; if anything my parents loved us too much for their OWN good,
sacrificing many things they could have enjoyed in life to expend most
of their time and energy on their children.
I agree that today many parents are afraid to discipline their children
for fear of being accused of abuse. While true child abuse is
something that makes me shudder, I think it's sad that loving parents
have to worry about unjust accusations when their kids NEED discipline.
Pat
|
156.70 | I'll vote for discipline | SONATA::HICKOX | Stow Vice | Fri Jan 15 1988 12:22 | 11 |
|
RE: .69 I have to totally agree with that. Discipline is
necessary (the extent depends on the incident).
I don't want my kids in corrections hall or prison
cause I was afraid of making their behind a little red,
or taking away some privilege. We have to be willing
to teach right and wrong, I'm not leaving it up to
anyone else.
Mark
|
156.72 | | DPDMAI::RESENDEP | following the yellow brick road... | Mon Jan 18 1988 14:11 | 6 |
| RE: .-1
Is corporal punishment more barbaric than the sort of behaviour
described in .64?
Pat
|
156.73 | | LIONEL::SAISI | a | Tue Jan 19 1988 11:31 | 10 |
| In some cases yes. Especially when you are talking about an
adult's behavior vs. the behavior of a 2 and 6 year old. I
think you have to pay attention to your child's temperament,
and not just do whatever your parents did to you. Some children
are very sensitive and just knowing that the parents are
displeased is enough ( I was one of those ). On the other hand some
kids may take the spankings quite stoically. It is probably
better to hit a kid, than denigrating them, or instilling all
sorts of guilt.
Linda
|
156.74 | | BEING::MCANULTY | _?_ | Wed Jan 20 1988 08:40 | 22 |
| > < Note 156.73 by LIONEL::SAISI "a" >
> kids may take the spankings quite stoically. It is probably
> better to hit a kid, than denigrating them, or instilling all
> sorts of guilt.
> Linda
I have to disagree here. Hitting a kid is not the answer.
There are many ways of getting the popint across than hitting
them. Having a chair, known as "The Chair". A friend of mine
runs a daycare, and she enrolls many kids whose parents work for
DEC, and people that I went to school with. They use the Chair
routine. The know the chair is a place for being bad, and it
is quite embarassing for them to be in that chair when they
are in front of their friends. And yes there are some that will
be bad, just for the attention. I am a FIRM believer, in NOT
hitting children. But, then that's just my opinion.
Micheal
|
156.75 | Hard to forgive my father for hitting me | PSYCHE::SULLIVAN | Singing for our lives | Wed Jan 20 1988 09:19 | 18 |
|
I think a lot of the Psych. research being done with children suggests
that hitting does not improve behavior. In fact, it may make the
child's behavior worse.
But I'm not a parent, and I can't possibly speak to the decisions
parents make at the moment, so I'm trying to avoid passing judgement.
I can speak, however, to my experiences as a child. I was not
physically abused (no bruises, broken bones, etc.), but I was "spanked"
occasionally. I cannot remember why I was spanked, but I can remember
my father's anger, the physical pain, and the humiliation that I
felt. I still feel anger toward him when I think about it. I
realize that parents have to make difficult choices sometimes, but
in my heart I feel that no one has the right to hit anyone else.
If I ever take part in raising a child, I hope that I could live
up to that belief.
Justine
|
156.76 | A new twist | CADSE::SPRIGGS | Darlene..Making Music ALL THE TIME! | Wed Jan 20 1988 09:38 | 15 |
|
To discipline my nephews, my brother-in-law would make them listen
to a 2 hour record set on how a young man should conduct himself,
and would quiz them afterwards. After a few months of this, they
began to beg to be SPANKED, knowing that it would only last a few
seconds and they could be on their way again.
As for knowing why you are being spanked, an ex-roomate (and single
parent) had an agreement with her daughter about disobedience.
If the child was told three times (gave space for a legitimate "I
forgot!"), and still didn't comply, she knew what to expect. Before
each spanking (which were very few and far between), the child's
mom would ask her if she knew why she was being spanked, and she
always answered "for being disobedient", with no prompting (Child,
age 4).
|
156.77 | not too warped | VINO::EVANS | | Wed Jan 20 1988 12:00 | 25 |
| RE: spanking/no spanking
Acouple of thoughts... First, if I remember the research/anecdotal
stuff correctly, different kids respond to different punishments.
The trick is to find what works with the kid in question. (Maybe
the 13-year-old hacker doesn't give 2 hoots about being grounded,
since she can stay in her room and break into VMS systems all night.
:-) )
I, too, am not a parent so maybe not the best to judge, but I think
there may indeed be times when the most direct route is the most
necessary. You simply *cannot* reason with kids who are too young
to understand what your point is, and for youngsters (and adults,
for that matter) the most efficient communication is thru the skin.
Touch somebody, and you have their attention. (Do I need a disclaimer
that I am not advocating beating the crap out of a kid?)
*I* was spanked. Not often. Once for running up the (very busy)
street - in the middle. I don't think it warped me. [now, now,
be kind :-)]
Just my 3.5c
--DE
|
156.79 | | BEING::MCANULTY | anyone but the WELCH's | Thu Jan 21 1988 13:17 | 34 |
|
Gale,
I've dated women, who have children, and I see how
each mother has dealt with each problem.
Spanking a child, is abuse. Spanking a child does not
mean you love them either. Spanking a child induces
a fear, not a fear of spanking from doing something
wrong, but a fear from the parents. Raise a hand to
a child that is spanked often, what;s the first reaction,
the child starts to raise his hands or peel away for
defense.
What happens if the spanking doesn't work, what then,
hit them with a stick to make it hurt more ??? Then what
if that doesn;t work, hit them in the face.....
I did a paper for my psych class in school, and I did it
on CHild Abuse. I spent alot of time with the Welfare Dept.
on the State Level. You'd be shocked to hear some of the
stories that I heard. It taught me alot.
I don't think Behavior has to do with spanking....It has to do
with DAY #1, when you are born. Do you get away with things
up until a certain age, I didn't, I was spanked as a kid,
many a time, (I was a little rebel you might say)....Spanking
didn't stop me, from doing anything, but I leanred what was right
and wrong, from someone telling me what was right, and wrong.
Everyone has their own opinion, but I wish I
could know the history of every child abuse case, and evolve back
and see how it started, maybe from a simple spanking 8 generations
ago....maybe not....
|
156.80 | I feel better now... | BEING::MCANULTY | anyone but the WELCH's | Thu Jan 21 1988 13:31 | 21 |
| > I don't think Behavior has to do with spanking....It has to do
> with DAY #1, when you are born. Do you get away with things
> up until a certain age, I didn't, I was spanked as a kid,
> many a time, (I was a little rebel you might say)....Spanking
> didn't stop me, from doing anything, but I leanred what was right
> and wrong, from someone telling me what was right, and wrong.
I goofed on the above paragraph. It should read:
I don't think Behavior has to do with spanking....It has to do
with DAY #1, when you are born. Do you get away with things
up until a certain age, I didn't. I learned what no was
very quickly. But, I was spanked as a kid, many a time,
(I was a little rebel you might say)....Spanking didn't stop me,
from doing anything, but I leanred what was right and wrong, from
someone telling me what was right, and wrong.
Micheal
|
156.82 | really? | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | | Thu Jan 21 1988 22:00 | 10 |
| Gale,
You may not be aware of this, but the message you seem to be sending in
your notes about spanking children is "This is the right way. No other
way works." When looked at that way, they sound patronizing and take on
a certain morally superior tone. I'm sure you're aware that there are
plenty of ways to raise a pleasant child. Not all of them involve your
method.
Liz
|
156.83 | | SPMFG1::CHARBONND | What a pitcher! | Fri Jan 22 1988 06:02 | 13 |
| I think one problem with spanking is that parents start late. When
the child is 1-2 the offense is 'cute'. Then it gets tiresome. But
the child is not stopped soon enough. The parent waits til (s)he
can't stand it any longer, then over reacts. Abuse instead of
simple spanking. The sooner a child is discouraged from mis-behaving,
the less spanking will ever be needed. One swat the first offense,
two for the second, three for the third. Most kids will never need
four swats to figure out "behavior X gets me swatted".
An excellent discussion on this subject can be found in (of all
places) "Starship Troopers" by Robert Heinlein.
Dana
|
156.85 | Be careful with children they are unpredictable | MARCIE::JLAMOTTE | renewal and resolution | Fri Jan 22 1988 07:54 | 25 |
| I am a mother of four and grandmother of two. Spanking is not
necessary and spanking many times only changes the child while they
are in the presence of the adult who administers the punishment.
These comments remind me of the rivalries women had when I was raising
children. Some women were so egotistical about their child rearing
skills and their status in the neighborhood was based on their
children's behavior.
Unfortunately the real test for me was between the ages of fourteen
and eighteen. Those were the roughest times...when one couldn't
spank and punishments had to be administered with consistency and
a very strong will.
I find as I come in contact with the young adults that I knew as
children that the most interesting, the most successful and some
of the most creative were not exemplary children. I have also observed
that many well behaved children have had problems with making decisions
and dealing with life in general.
I am very sympathetic to the development process especially when
I reminisce about my own childhood and that of my own children.
Creativity, imagination and initiative are difficult to develop
in the context of a 'perfect' child. And yet these are so important
in the achievers of this world.
|
156.86 | There may be other methods that work | PNEUMA::SULLIVAN | Singing for our lives | Fri Jan 22 1988 09:09 | 17 |
|
Gale,
I don't think Liz was really responding to the content of your notes
(though I suspect you have different ideas about raising children)
but to the _This_is_THE_Way_it_is manner in which you expressed
your ideas. I think she made the "assumption" that once this was
pointed out to you, you would step back a little bit.
I've known some wonderfully behaved children whose parents never
spanked them. Spanking may work for you, but I, too, take offense
at your suggestion that if you don't spank your kids, they will
be brats.
Justine
|
156.87 | Cease Fire | GCANYN::TATISTCHEFF | Lee T | Fri Jan 22 1988 09:21 | 11 |
| re .86
Agreed. Gale, if you disagree on this issue and feel unable to
grant that the other might have some truth (I feeling I know well
-- replay the run-ins I have had regarding violence in general),
how about agreeing to disagree with us on that one idea?
After all, you have made your point, and others have made theirs,
so y'all should cut your (our) losses and end the war, eh?
Lee
|
156.88 | Just my opinion/experiences! | QBUS::WOOD | Met him on a Monday | Fri Jan 22 1988 19:15 | 23 |
|
Now I know why I seldom read this file....why the problem
with stating what one person feels is right?? And letting
other people state what works for them?? We could argue
from now til doomsday who's "right"....Gale, I too, am a
single mother, have raised my 2 teenage daughters from the
time they were 1 and 3 years old and they are not 14 and 16
all by myself with no support (financial or emotional) from
their father. I don't believe in spanking. And have had
other "non-parenting adults" tell me that my children are
very well behaved, polite and considerate. I have *proof*
that there are alternatives to spanking children. Someone
else said it earlier...the key is finding what works for
your child. For my youngest, sending her to her room as
punishment is not punishment. She would be quite content
there listening to her music. So I take away privileges
that I know are important to her!
I was spanked a lot as a child and it took years to get over
the resentment and hatred that I felt toward my parents for
this. It did nothing to make me a "better" child either!
Myra
|
156.89 | One man's opinion about spanking | OPHION::KARLTON | Phil Karlton, Western Software Lab | Fri Jan 22 1988 21:55 | 27 |
| The last time I spanked my son was when he was a year and half.
He is now 16, and most people consider him a nice person. The event
traumatized me enough that it still stands out vividly in my memory.
Writing this note still evokes those funny feelings in my stomach.
The basic situation was that he took off across the street by himself.
When I got over to the other side, after the truck passed by, I
spanked him right there on the sidewalk. I must have swatted him
a half dozen times and yelled NO!, NO!, NO! with each swat.
I don't think I hurt him very much (phsically) through the layers
of clothing and diapers. However, it was clear to him that his father
was quite upset.
It was probably 7 or 8 years before he would cross a street without
having an automatic reflex to reach out for a hand to hold.
It's my opinion (Your mileage may vary.) that is OK to spank a child
to prevent life threatening behaviors when the child is not capable
of understanding the words you say or the consequences of those
actions.
To answer the main question in this thread: some children are fun
to be around and some are not.
PK
|
156.90 | | DPDMAI::RESENDEP | following the yellow brick road... | Mon Jan 25 1988 11:15 | 26 |
| > *I* was spanked. Not often. Once for running up the (very busy)
> street - in the middle. I don't think it warped me. [now, now,
> be kind :-)]
I can identify with that! The worst spanking I ever got was for
suddenly dis-engaging my hand from my mother's and running out into the
street in front of a speeding (siren going) fire truck. I wanted to be
able to see it better! I remember it well because Mother was in tears
when she administered the punishment -- it was the worst scare of her
life! It was years later when I understood why she was crying as
she spanked me.
I am very glad now that my mother punished me severely enough to make
me remember for the rest of my life how closely I came to getting
killed that day!
> Spanking a child induces a fear, not a fear of spanking from
> doing something wrong, but a fear from the parents.
As an adult whose parents spanked me occasionally when I was a child, I
can positively state that the above statement is false. I'm sure
it's true for some, but stated as a gross generalization and applied
to everyone as it was above, it is false. I, along with many, many
others, am a living exception that proves it.
Pat
|
156.92 | I'll answer the initial question... | PARITY::SMITH | Penny Smith, TWO/B5, 247-2203 | Mon Jan 25 1988 21:12 | 26 |
| re .0, Vivien
More often than not I'd have to admit that I DO NOT like being around
children. I personally have a difficult time blocking out NOISE distractions,
and let's face it, a lot of the kids today are loud and noisy. I've tried
very hard to become more 'tolerant'.. but I'm not having great success.
I also wonder if I'm not overly sensitive and particularly negative because
as a former public school teacher who has always been single, I've had to
deal with OTHER people's children... never my own (including helping to
raise my neice and nephew)!?
This *very touchy subject* is causing me a lot of pain right now, in my
current relationship... because my SO is a divorced father who has his
children 3 out of 4 weekends per month... and I'm not too wildly fond
of our weekend activities revolving around the little ones. (sigh)
Just as an aside... I'm relatively new to WOMANNOTES... have done mostly
read_only_every_once_in_a_while... and am surprised to see that the
majority of notes/replys to this topic don't necessarily answer the intial
topic question posed! It seems to me that the replys have shifted to
folks' philosophical views on discipline... 'to spank or not to spank'...
are the moderators perhaps too busy/caught up with the 'debate' issues
around FWO or FMO to move/shift a few notes here?
Penny
|
156.93 | Give me a break | BEING::MCANULTY | Hang the welchman | Tue Jan 26 1988 08:56 | 23 |
|
>> Spanking a child induces a fear, not a fear of spanking from
>> doing something wrong, but a fear from the parents.
> As an adult whose parents spanked me occasionally when I was a child, I
> can positively state that the above statement is false. I'm sure
> it's true for some, but stated as a gross generalization and applied
> to everyone as it was above, it is false. I, along with many, many
> others, am a living exception that proves it.
> Pat
First of all, you read a little too deep, that I was making a gross
generalization. Second, Because you along with many, many others
are living proofs, are a living exception. Can you account for
everyone else in the world ????
If everyone knows so much about everything why don't you run for
the presidency of the US !!!!!
Micheal
|
156.94 | Seen and not Heard ??? Hardly | FXADM::OCONNELL | Irish by Name | Tue Jan 26 1988 09:15 | 53 |
| re: -1
> and let's face it, a lot of the kids today are loud and noisy.
Kids have ALWAYS been loud and noisy! It's part of being a
kid...but kids are not loud and noisy all the time. Believe it
or not, kids do find *quiet* time to be comforting and balancing,
and they DO need it every once in a while.
I'm the mother of four but I can't say that I like to be around
kids all the time. On the contrary, I think I'd go nuts! But I
find there's a strange phenomenon that occurs when I am with the
kids:
If I am calm and cheerful, they tend to be.
When I am cross, impatient, and in thoroughly bad temper, they
also tend to be.
The trick is to recognize that one is in a bad mood and that,
like a virus, a bad mood can spread. If you can exercise a bit
of mind control over yourself (and I don't say this works for me
all the time), you can also help your kids get their bad moods
under control.
My 7 year old and I have a joke about that. He was really
whining and complaining one evening. *Everything* was going
wrong for him! (kids are so absolute!) I told him -- sotto voce
-- that I had a special secret for him. I told him that he had
the power, inside him to make it a good day...just like He-Man,
he could say "I HAVE THE POWER", and presto! It would be a much
better day for him. He cracked up! And now when he gets cross I
tell him in his ear..."Remember, YOU have the POWER!" This
doesn't work with all of them. Someone mentioned back a few
notes that you just have to find the way that works with each. We
sometimes forget that kids and *individuals* and try to lump them
into one big behavioral unit.
My youngest can be persuaded to get a book a just sit quietly
with Mom when I need some quiet time. That wouldn't have worked
with my daughter. He'll even tell me, "Mom, I need some quiet
time too."
My oldest (age 10) can be persuaded to get his drawing book.
That guarantees me a good hour of peace. My end of the bargain
is to be attentive when he's finished and really look at what
he's drawn.
Make contracts with your kids. If you give me a little peace,
I'll give you a little extra attention. It really does work once
they realize you mean it and you'll follow through.
Roxanne
|
156.95 | | DPDMAI::RESENDEP | following the yellow brick road... | Tue Jan 26 1988 10:16 | 21 |
| Michael,
The statement "Spanking a child is abuse" is a generalization. You
didn't say "Spanking *some* children is abuse", or "Spanking a child
*in certain ways* is abuse." You didn't even say "In my opinion,
spanking a child is abuse." You simply made a blanket statement
that left no room for anyone else to disagree.
I was spanked, as were (are) millions of other children, and I
certainly was NEVER abused by my parents. While quite true for me, that
doesn't apply to every parent and every child any more than your
statement applies to everyone.
I have no children, and heaven knows how I would feel about spanking
them if I did. But regardless of how I would treat my own hypothetical
children, I KNOW how I was treated, and I WAS spanked, and it was
NOT abuse. Therefore spanking a child is not ALWAYS abuse. Period.
That's all I was trying to say.
Pat
|
156.96 | in the spirit of not generalizing... | SUPER::HENDRICKS | The only way out is through | Tue Jan 26 1988 15:16 | 26 |
| Would it be safe to summarize as follows?
Some children are abused by their parents and end up spending a
lifetime trying to work through their problems, or worse, acting
out their pain.
Other children are abused by their parents and have the luck, strength,
and good fortune to turn out well in spite of that.
Some children are spanked by their parents and end up spending a
lot of time trying to work through their resentment and fear.
Other children are spanked by their parents at times. They know
their limits. They also know they are loved and they turn out well
and happy.
Some children are not physically abused, or spanked by their parents.
They have no sense of boundaries or limits. They can be extremely
difficult to be around.
Other children are not physically abused or spanked by their parents,
yet are happy, cooperative children who know they are loved and
who are a pleasure to be around.
|
156.97 | don't follow me, I'm not on topic! | YODA::BARANSKI | Im here for an argument, not Abuse! | Tue Jan 26 1988 15:31 | 78 |
| RE: .* Disciplining children
Are Children any less people then adults? Do they have any less rights? Don't
children deserve explanations? Do you know some 'adults' you'd like to spank?
Why don't you? Why spank children then?
I usually try to explain the situation to my kids, a couple of times. If they
get obnoxious I take them out. They usually realize that they are behaving
unacceptably, without me spanking them. It's not punishment, it's a
consequence.
Children, the way some people raise them, or think they should be raised, have
very few rights, often not even everyday decisions like what to wear, what to
eat, where to go. Some children spend their days being dragged around by their
parent without care for the child.
Children need to make decisions, have choices from acceptable alternatives...
Children are people too. There are times that the parent has to be the boss,
but doesn't have to be all the time. There are times when you have to say,
'look, I know that you don't understand, but that's the way it has to be...'
RE: .64
If I recieve an invitation to dinner, I usually ask if kids can come; regardless
of what the invitation read. I do this because quite often I can't come without
them, in which case we both lose, and I really *do* want to come!
RE: .67 Ann
Consistency is important so that children know what the rules are, and the world
is predictable for them, ... yet ... differing circumstances do affect rules;
ever rule has it's exception... Like when a child is misbehaving because they
are tired, punichment accomplishes nothing, putting them to sleep is more
productive.
RE: .76
"To discipline my nephews, my brother-in-law would make them listen to a 2 hour
record set on how a young man should conduct himself, and would quiz them
afterwards."
Where can I get such a record?! :-)
RE: .88 Myra
"why the problem with stating what one person feels is right?? And letting
other people state what works for them??"
I don't have a problem with it. I don't agree, but I don't get upset over what
someone else believes, unless that person is *****very***** important to me.
This is a widespread problem in this file; I wish it were less.
RE: .89, .90 "life threatening situations"
I can imagine that...
"Spanking a child induces a fear,"
I do believe that, without exception. However, different children will form
different associations for that fear. Gale's spanking may not harm her children
because she makes it clear each time, why the spanking is being given. Also,
most children are able to 'get over it'. My parents did some pretty strange
things to try to get me to 'behave', however, I have forgiven them; I know that
they love me.
RE: .93
"If everyone knows so much about everything why don't you run for the presidency
of the US !!!!"
That was uncalled for!
RE: spanking
I would not call spanking necessarily abuse, but nor do I think it is necessary,
and I think there are better ways...
Jim.
|
156.98 | RE: .96 -- Thank you !! | DPDMAI::RESENDEP | following the yellow brick road... | Tue Jan 26 1988 15:38 | 1 |
|
|
156.99 | I am a mother, I have been there and back | BUFFER::LEEDBERG | An Ancient Multi-hued Dragon | Wed Jan 27 1988 08:40 | 22 |
| (Have I answered this before?)
Do I enjoy being around children? Yes and no.
Do I enjoy being around adults? Yes and no.
Do I believe in physical punishment for children? Most of the
time I would not. (This is now, I am have to admit that I did
strike my children when I was younger.)
There is another element in human interaction that I would like
to point out. That is one of verbal language and body language
(facial expressions) that convey the message very clearly about
approved or unapproved behavior. It takes concentration and effort
by the parent (and consitentency). For some children it works for
others nothing works.
_peggy
(-)
|
Physical pain does not inspire LOVE for
only FEAR of
|
156.100 | TDYOT -- The Disgusting Youth Of Today | WHYVAX::KRUGER | | Fri Jan 29 1988 18:56 | 24 |
| re .92
"A lot of kids today are loud and noisy"
etc. etc.
To quote a slightly older source (*literally* in hieroglyphics)
"The young today show no respect for their elders. And the girls
shamelessly paint their lips with Henna...."
People, the young have been acting up for a LONG time, and if you
think it used to be better, that's probably because you were younger
then too.
An eye-opening book called "Jews Without Money" taught me that getto
life is largely the same from generation to generation. The gettos
at the turn of the century had all the modern problems, with much
the same proportions and percentages. The only real difference I
can see today is that kids learn obnoxious things on television
-- behavior for which I believe everyone designing Saturday morning
cartoons, should be *shot*. But this is a relatively minor aberation.
dov
|
156.101 | Rah Mom! | WHYVAX::KRUGER | | Fri Jan 29 1988 19:12 | 10 |
| re .96
Yea! :-) What you said about child rearing gives me a warm and fuzzy
feeling inside. I hope I can do as good a job of parenting. (Quite
a few years down the road yet).
re .99
Pain is not supposed to inspire love, but rather to inspire behavior
that is demanded by the parent, whether right or wrong.
|
156.102 | Spank 'em good! | WHYVAX::KRUGER | | Fri Jan 29 1988 19:17 | 19 |
| re .97
>Are children any less people than adults? ...
>Do you know some adults you'd like to spank?
[YES]
>Why don't you
[CAN'T FACE THE REPERCUSSIONS, OR MAYBE CAN'T OVERPOWER THEM]
>Why spank children then?
[BECAUSE YOU CAN GET AWAY WITH IT, AND PREVENT THEM (hopefully)
FROM BECOMING AN OBNOXIOUS ADULT!]
:-) :-) :-) grin! that was a good one Jim!
dov
|
156.103 | I punch pillows not people | BUFFER::LEEDBERG | An Ancient Multi-hued Dragon | Sun Jan 31 1988 17:48 | 24 |
| I spoke with Greta last night and she does not remember me
hitting her - which amazed me becasue I had thought that I
had. She thinks that I was a successful parent because I
allowed her to make her own mistakes (in reality I could not
stop her without doing damage to her self-image). We talked
about hitting children and being hit and how it feels.
The following is my opinion only -
If you are cool headed enough to spank a child in a "rational"
way and are also able to explain that it is for their own good
then when spank why not be totally rational and explain why
the behavior is not wanted? The only time I have even thought
about hitting my kids was when I was very angry - that may
explain why I thought I had spanked Greta but in fact I was just
angry enough to to it - but rational enough to want to not hurt
her.
_peggy
(-)
|
The Goddess does not punish or reward -
It is us "humans" who deal in this muck.
|
156.104 | ANOTHER VIEWPOINT | ISTG::GARDNER | | Tue Feb 02 1988 16:32 | 6 |
| A good book to read on the experience of feelings about children is
THE MOTHER KNOT. It is a fair description of how feelings fluctuate.
I lent my copy to someone contemplating a "late-in-life" pregnancy so
I can't insert the author's name here. It is autobiographical.
justme....jacqui
|