[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference turris::womannotes-v1

Title:ARCHIVE-- Topics of Interest to Women, Volume 1 --ARCHIVE
Notice:V1 is closed. TURRIS::WOMANNOTES-V5 is open.
Moderator:REGENT::BROOMHEAD
Created:Thu Jan 30 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 30 1995
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:873
Total number of notes:22329

154.0. "Study indicates increased miscarriage among chip workers" by HPSCAD::WALL (I see the middle kingdom...) Wed Dec 24 1986 08:46

    
    I heard a somewhat disturbing report this morning.
    
    Apparently, a study done by the University of Massachusetts indicates
    that women working at the semiconductor plant in Hudson have an
    above-average incidence of miscarriage in comparison to those not
    exposed to the processes of computer chip manufacture.
    
    Before I get jumped on, I have not seen the study.  I don't know
    who was involved aside from the University of Massachusetts.  I'm
    just relating the report I heard on the radio this morning, and
    it struck me as an issue of interest for this conference.  If it
    belongs someplace else, someone should feel free to ship it.
    
    DFW
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
154.1Correct, but not conclusiveSONATA::HICKOXWed Dec 24 1986 09:0311
    DFW,
    
       This was a five year study and shows a statistical, not causal
    relationship between chip processes and miscarriages.  Digital has
    advised employees of the study and has recommended pregnant employees
    to seek other positions and has offered women of child bearing age
    the ability to transfer to other positions as well.   Other computer
    chip manufacturer's are being advised of the study, so that they
    may take appropriate action.  I'm sure something will be published
    by the company in DTW, etc.... soon.
    
154.2more infoDINER::SHUBINGo ahead - make my lunch!Wed Dec 24 1986 09:2222
re: .1
       This was a five year study and shows a statistical, not causal
    relationship between chip processes and miscarriages.  

I thought that it was a one-time study. I was in the control group of the
study, along with a number of people in my group, both male and female. We
work in building 2 at HLO, so we're not exposed to the chemicals that the
production-line workers are exposed to (or at least not directly exposed).

They found two levels of increased miscarriage: The first was somewhat
higher than the control group (or the general population), but not high
enough to be statistically significant. The second group miscarried about
twice the level of the control group (or the general population). The people
who carried out the study said that more research was needed.

Apparently (my information comes from this morning's Boston Globe) the study
was commissioned when some workers noticed a higher-than-normal rate of
miscarriage among women who work on the chip-production lines.  That's a
nice response on the part of the company;  they certainly could have ignored
it.  Let's hope that they carry through further.

					-- hal
154.3According to APBCSE::RODERICKgone fissionWed Dec 24 1986 12:4464
Associated Press Wed 24-DEC-1986 04:11                   Digital Miscarriages

   Study: Miscarriages Up In Women Exposed In Computer Chip Process
   HUDSON, Mass. (AP) - Significantly more miscarriages have been
found among women production workers at a semiconductor plant than
those not exposed to processes used in making computer chips, a
study has found.
   In one principal area of production, the level of miscarriages
was twice that of non-production workers, according to the
University of Massachusetts' School of Public Health study
commissioned by Digital Equipment Corp.
   The findings, believed to be the first of its kind in the
computer industry, has broad implications for the computer chip
industry, which employs more than 55,000 U.S. production workers,
with most believed to be women.
   The study, which found no evidence of a wide range of other
major health disorders such as birth defects and infertility,
surveyed 744 of Digital's nearly 2,000 workers at the Hudson
semiconductor plant. Of those studied, 294 were production-line
workers and the rest were non-production workers.
   The study, based on the history of the workers at the plant for
five years, was designed to measure a wide range of possible health
problems among women and men. In all, 471 women were studied and
273 men.
   Among the non-production workers, the study found that 18
percent of the pregnancies resulted in miscarriages, similar to the
general population.
   The incidence of miscarriages among production workers involved
in what is known as photolithography, however, was 29 percent. A
variety of solvents are used in the process, which involves
printing circuits on computer chips.
   Among workers in a phase of production that uses acids in an
etching process, researchers found a miscarriage rate of 39
percent, twice that of the control group.
   Digital said it immediately passed along the findings to its
workers.
   ``We've kept our employees informed all along,'' spokesman
Jeffrey Gibson said Tuesday. He said Digital adopted a policy
during the study of encouraging pregnant production workers to seek
transfers.
   As a further precaution, Gibson said Digital also is offering to
transfer any female production worker of child-bearing age to
non-production work if they have concerns about future pregnancy.
   Gibson said Digital decided to do a study after employees began
noticing increased cases of miscarriages among their colleagues.
   Digital and the researchers stressed that the link between
production-line work and increased miscarriages was only a
statistical one and that no causal relationship between the health
and specific chemicals had been established.
   The Semiconductor Industry Association, headquartered south of
San Francisco, said Digital sent it a summary of the findings and
that the information was passed along to 60 of its computer chip
manufacturer members.
   ``The reaction (of manufacturers) was that the firms all felt an
obligation to communicate the information about the study to their
employees,'' said Shelia Sandow, association spokeswoman.
   The full study, conducted by Harris Pastides, an associate
professor of public health at the University of Massachusetts in
Amherst, and Edward Calabrese, a professor of toxicology, is still
going through review before publication in a medical journal.
   But Digital officials said they received a copy of the study
last month, and felt, along with its authors, a responsibility to
release at least a summary of the findings because of the health
concerns.
154.4yikes!DROID::DAUGHANKellyWed Dec 24 1986 13:2511
    i work in the fab area...in one certain area all the women that
    i know that were trying to have children,have suffered miscarriages.
    the inccident of premature births is also high.it is really horrifing
    to think about the long term effects on my body.
   but i am there by choice,i enjoy my job.digital has changed its attitude
    towards this situation during the seven years i have been here.
    i really commend DEC for the study,and for being totally honest
    with us.
    
    				kelly 
   
154.5RSTS32::TABERIf you can't bite, don't bark!Mon Jan 05 1987 12:246
What really bothers me is that all the other major computer companies
put alot of heat on Uncle Ken to STOP this study......

God, what else aren't they telling us?

Karen
154.6DEC leaks like a sieve...CADSYS::RICHARDSONMon Jan 05 1987 12:435
    I dunno, but since this is DEC, probably not much, or it would have
    leaked out to Computer World by now!  I was one of the controls
    for the HLO study also; I work in HLO2.
    
    /Charlotte
154.7huh?????DROID::DAUGHANKellyMon Jan 05 1987 15:127
    re.5
    what else aren't"they" telling us. just who are you talking about???
    
    well as you may have noticed "uncle" ken did not fold under pressure.
    
    
    								kelly
154.8RSTS32::TABERIf you can't bite, don't bark!Tue Jan 06 1987 13:5812
The powers that be, basically.  The folks who make the decisions to
cut our benefits and tell us AFTER the fact.  The folks who knew
that chemicals were being stored at the Mill on 5-1, and didn't elect
to tell anyone until after the fire they caused.

Uncle Ken's resolve in this study is indeed admirable, but by no means
noteworthy.  

I am pessimistic about the intent behind the study, and Digital's
motivation is still the almighty buck.

Karen
154.9Don't mind me...HPSCAD::WALLI see the middle kingdom...Tue Jan 06 1987 15:475
    
    I have changed the title of the note to be more indicative of what
    it is about.
    
    DFW
154.10rumors only!!!!!DROID::DAUGHANKellyTue Jan 06 1987 19:2012
    i am not sure of this but i think some of the motivation(or rumor
    has it)came from former workers sueing DEC,or people going threatening
    walking off job.
    what is ironic is that non of the female workers needed that study
    to tell us that. we where just shocked at how high it was...
    
    still all in all i think digital did and is doing the right thing.
    
    one other note of interest is that 60 minutes did a story about
    the semi-conductor people out in silicon valley,that started in
    the business 15 years ago,are now sueing companies cuz of all the
    lung damage.
154.11An additional warningREGENT::BROOMHEADDon't panic -- yet.Wed Jan 07 1987 12:133
    It is a good rule of thumb that anything that can harm a zygote
    can also damage gametes.  So men in the area can worry too.
    							Ann B.