T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
139.2 | Quality responses can add value | ESPN::HENDRICKS | Holly | Thu Dec 18 1986 10:54 | 23 |
| They are not as profound as some of the other notes.
I had the same feeling when the first hair question came up (somewhere
in the numbers 50-65, I think). I thought to myself, "damn, this
is going to trivialize this file". But as I read the thoughtful
responses, I began to think that this was a good forum for bringing
up seemingly trivial (or cosmetic) topics. If you talk about such
topics at work, you run a big risk of being patronized by anyone
within earshot. After running through suggestions from friends
and family members, I think it would be helpful to be able to solicit
input from this community if input was wanted.
The key point for me was "how do you tell a co-worker something
difficult and personal that you find offensive?". That's not trivial
at all!
And if some useful medical information or folk remedies come out
of the cold feet discussion, that will seem very valuable, too.
One of the things I like is the way that this noting community can
take a seemingly trivial topic and respond to it in a useful and
informative way! Thanks for not setting those notes to no further
responses....
|
139.3 | | ULTRA::GUGEL | Simplicity is Elegance | Thu Dec 18 1986 11:24 | 19 |
| I hadn't thought about it until you mentioned it here, Karen.
I know some people (especially male) are going to think this is
a flame, but I did notice that the basenote of #136 (the perfume one)
was entered by a man. I don't know about note #138 because the author
did not sign a name nor is entered in either of the introduction notes.
My guess is that a man entered it.
My last wish is to discourage men from entering here because we've
had some great contributions and discussions from and with men. But
I do think that this file has a lot of men contributing who are not as
interested in women's serious concerns as other men are (and women).
It seems like this file is fast becoming not a "women's forum" as
I would like (I don't know how others feel), but more of a place
where we end up defending ourselves (*a lot* lately). This file, as
I remember, was started as a *safe place* for women. Any entries on
what that means to you?
-Ellen
|
139.4 | even trivia is informative | WATNEY::SPARROW | You want me to do what?? | Thu Dec 18 1986 12:08 | 22 |
| I thought that the purpose of this file was not only for a *safe*
place for woman to interact and share information, but to help
in understanding male/female situations. Some of the *trivial*
entries have been informative. I am a person who always wears
perfume and hadn't thought about the possibility of wearing too
much. I am a beautician and wanted to enter some hints to the person
who wanted some input regarding her hair, but some of the tones of
responses regarding trivia backed me off. Cold feet *do* exsist
and I didn't feel that it was a trivial contribution and thought
the humor of some of the replies had a lightening effect. I feel
that yes, this is a womans forum, and everyone should feel free
to input responses. The men who read this file give the impression
of wanting some understanding and maybe interjecting some male
points of view. There is no harm being done, let them continue
to respond to this file. Let *any* topic be discussed. There is
value in all humans interpretation and if helping the opposite gender
understand our point of view comes out of this file, it is a success.
Please, this is *MY* opinion, no flaming. I enjoy this file because
of the freedom to enter replies. Don't limit it to women only.
Vivian
|
139.5 | | USFSHQ::SMANDELL | | Thu Dec 18 1986 12:21 | 11 |
| I don't mind the "trivial"issues that come up. We need to "lighten
up" once in a while anyway. Constant intensity can get boring,
too. What I do mind is some of the valueless, so-called "humor"
that some people find necessary to throw in. Maybe we need a new
"noter's convention" (like the sideways happy face) that will denote,
"I'm going to be an asshole now, so ignore what I enter!"
:^)
Sheila
|
139.6 | Moderator anxiety | RSTS32::TABER | If you can't bite, don't bark! | Thu Dec 18 1986 12:25 | 19 |
| Not to worry, Vivian. This conference will never bar men from responding,
and as long as I'm an assistant mod, any topic with interested parties will
never be discontinued as long as it doesn't get too out of hand. Like
spears flying and such....
We support moderation in everything, including moderating!
I am soliciting opinions to adjust my own personal headset, to check
the balance of responses, and because I worry that I'm not a good
moderator and maybe I should be doing SOMETHING (like maybe killing
a few topics, banging a few heads, or deleting topics at random :*))
instead of sitting back and letting you folks judge what you want
to deal with and not....
I'm in favor of sitting back.... I'm just insecure is all....
By the way, has ANYONE heard from Maggie?????!!!!!!
This is a Bugsy-note :*)
|
139.7 | It beats MENSNOTES, by far | TOPDOC::SLOANE | | Thu Dec 18 1986 12:30 | 22 |
| These are my views as a human being. Part of my being a human being
is the fact that I have been a male for more than 50 years, (all
my life, as a matter of fact) and what I say here is what I personally
feel and think, bad jokes and all.
I think the cold hands topic is ridiculously trivial, and I entered
a note to that effect before I read this note.
The perfume topic does not seem trivial, but addresses some real
issues. (I'm allergic to most perfumes, so this may have some bearing.
You can imagine what a handicap this was in high school. AH-CHOO!)
I am constantly amazed at what appears in this file. In my opinion,
this is the most interesting, educative, and informative Notes file
of all. It contains vital discussion on topics of interest to all
human beings. I feel privileged to read it, and honored to contribute
to it.
Bruce
|
139.8 | good job being done! | WATNEY::SPARROW | You want me to do what?? | Thu Dec 18 1986 12:31 | 7 |
| re: .6
I think you are doing a marvelous job! I didn't mean to be
crabby. I just got concerned. Please, keep us the good job,
I enjoy the interaction!!!!! :-)
vivian
|
139.9 | opps, my fingers don't work! | WATNEY::SPARROW | You want me to do what?? | Thu Dec 18 1986 12:34 | 6 |
| I made a slight typo,,,,,,,,
I *meant* to say::::::: Keep up the good work!
Vivian
|
139.10 | Let it be | SNICKR::SSMITH | | Thu Dec 18 1986 12:47 | 14 |
| The cold feet/hands note did leave itself open for some humorous
remarks, but so what. Whats wrong with a little humor. It's also
one of those notes that although you might find it trivial, after
you read it you kind of sit back and say "gee, ya know, I've always
noticed that too."
As for the perfume, I see nothing trivial about it. It's a legit
issue that offends people. Besides. There isn't enough interaction
between men and women in the world, and what goes on in this open
forum is great. I, for one, have learned a great deal and have put
many things I've read into action in my everyday life.
Steve
|
139.11 | Laughing Allowed! | USFSHQ::SMANDELL | | Thu Dec 18 1986 12:54 | 13 |
| Re: .5, l10
I think I should clarify my remark about the humor. I certainly
hope we can include humor in this file. What I meant was the flame-
inducing, "devil's advocate", "let me enter this to see who's dander
I can get up" and for-no-other-reason kind of "humor" (that was an
explanation I got when I sent mail directly to one of those people),
which is why I added the adjective "so-called".
Hope I haven't gone too far on a tangent.
SM
|
139.12 | Just my opinion... | LYMPH::MUNSON | | Thu Dec 18 1986 13:48 | 9 |
| I'd rather read 10-11 one page notes on cold feet (and other such
everyday trials and tribulations) than 8-10 novellas from folks that
take themselves so seriously that they cannot see when discussion has
sunk to name-calling, self-aggrandizement and (usually unsupported)
assertion. People can learn more about each other (and themselves!)
in peaceful discussion/comparison of everyday stuff than they can in
theorizing about whose suffering is greater.
Joanne
|
139.13 | she reads every note! | ESPN::HENDRICKS | Holly | Thu Dec 18 1986 13:54 | 5 |
| Maggie may want to throw her own 2 cents in :-), but she is alive
and well and temporarily in read-only mode while she addresses some
of life's (and Digital's) more cosmic issues!
Holly
|
139.14 | Trivial? Let the writer judge. | JETSAM::HANAUER | Mike...Bicycle~to~Ice~Cream | Thu Dec 18 1986 14:25 | 5 |
| Creation of the fear that someone is judging that what you write may
be too trivial would be an excellent way to kill the best qualities of
this conference.
Mike
|
139.15 | An answer to the question | MORGAN::BARBER | | Thu Dec 18 1986 15:17 | 52 |
| RE .0
I am the author of 138, and to clear the air I am a male.
Let me start off by stating this is NOT a flame, nor is it
directed to anyone in particular.
The thought behind the entry was one from a two sided value.
First is the fact that virtually every woman Ive ever shared a
special relationship with has had (to the touch) cold hands
and feet. This is not to say that they as a person were cold,
in many cases this was far from the truth. It just interested
me as a unique phenomenon. Thus the entry.
On the other side, yes the entry was made in a "light hearted "
manner. It in essence is too much of a fun subject to be
(or looked at ) in any other manner. It would appear that most
of the responders took it in that manner and entered their comments.
Now if it seriously offended someone I hereby apologize, but in
all honesty I cant imagine why it would. Now there is another
subject authored by me (balance in a new relationship) that was
entered as a serious subject. It received a variety of different
responses of different tones. At this I took no offense, since
in essence I asked for it since I wanted a female prospective
on the subject. The same thought , of a female train of thought
was what I sought on the cold feet note.
Now if you moderators wished to have made this file a serious
subject / discussion only file, something of that nature should
have been stated in the opening entrys. It would appear that the
majority of the responding audience to this note favors an occasional
touch of humor and a chance to smile.
I have meet and have come to know a few of the ladies in this file
and I believe that anyone of them can vouch that Iam not some horror
able anti female ogre. For that matter I really happen to be a
person very interested in what I refer to as a human nature understudy.
And to those responders who see no value in the chance to lighten up,
and have a sense of humor at some occasional humor, you have my sympathy.
If you as the co-moderator intend to make this a structured serious
only file Ill bow out now before I get banned (if this entry docent
do it for me :-) ) thrown out, or write locked. My own personal
opinion says your loosing a possible valuable contributor, but
sorry folk's I do see the value of humor, triviality, and the
ability to laugh at ones self.
AS John Handcock put it "Ill sign this with my full name for the
world to see"
Regards
Bob Barber
|
139.16 | What, me worry? | RSTS32::TABER | If you can't bite, don't bark! | Thu Dec 18 1986 15:30 | 29 |
|
> If you as the co-moderator intend to make this a structured serious
> only file Ill bow out now before I get banned (if this entry docent
> do it for me :-) ) thrown out, or write locked. My own personal
> opinion says your loosing a possible valuable contributor, but
> sorry folk's I do see the value of humor, triviality, and the
> ability to laugh at ones self.
Not me, kiddo. I'm the author of "Should I have traded my husband
in a beer league softball game or not?", and I fully support the lighter
hearted notes as well....
Please don't misunderstand my intent.... I was only polling the Noters out
of my concern for keeping the conference up to Maggie's inimitatable style...
rather awe-inspiring shoes to fill, as most of you will agree.
Personally, I like to avoid notes that involve the discussion of what I
consider fluff topics.... so those notes I do read-only... and everyone's
happy. I would never impose my personal preference on the conference,
like write-locking anyone or such.... Please be aware that when I said
fluff topics, it was from being a noter like you, not a moderator...
And it looks like the majority of folks enjoy the lighter notes...
Enjoy... Big Sister is nowhere in sight!!
And we would be disappointed if you left us, Bob....
Bugs note :*)
|
139.17 | Not a moderator problem. | EXCELL::SHARP | Don Sharp, Digital Telecommunications | Thu Dec 18 1986 15:48 | 33 |
| I think what we have here is a small clash of cultures. It seems to me that
at the start of November, when ZEPPO::MEN was active, we got a
cross-pollination from a couple of other related conferences, both in
membership and in the nature of the topics that come up, and the fallout has
not settled. This could be a good thing in the long run, but in the short
run I think it means that noters who don't share all the values the
WOMANNOTES community holds dear are making their presence felt. And that
makes it uncomfortable for those of us who liked things the way they were.
This isn't something a moderator can change or even have much influence
over. It goes beyond respecting the rules as stated in 1.*. It has to do
with culture, which means shared values. Not all the members of any
conference share all the same values, but WOMANNOTES certainly embodies a
different set of values than SOAPBOX does for instance, or JOYOFLEX.
People have a way of figuring out what the culture and style of a NOTES
conference is, and finding their own way to fit in. Otherwise they stop
participating. Some people take longer than others, and some are more
stylistically flexible than others, but sooner or later things seem to work
out.
Topics that are truly trivial have a way of dying out pretty quickly, and
topics that are truly significant have a way of coming up again and again in
many different topics and replies.
I think one of the great values of the non-technical conferences like this
is that we get an opportunity to see how the electronic medium of NOTES
influences the way we function as a community. I think as we are tending to
do more and more of our work through electronic media it becomes more and
more important to understand how people "work" together through electronic
media.
Don.
|
139.18 | let's keep the humor | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | | Thu Dec 18 1986 19:51 | 10 |
| I for the most part have enjoyed the balance of discussion in this
notes file. Having a forum for discussing daily life issues has
been extremely valuable -- I think we are all learning from it.
I have often had "ME TOO!" reaction to these notes, and am learning
to be more vocal about that. My concern about this file is that
we occasionally allow ourselves to be sidetracked by people who
don't want to share, but rather, who want to anger us. (Thanks to
those who raise flags about this behavior).
liz
|
139.19 | a first (& hopefully last) note | DECWET::JWHITE | weird wizard white | Thu Dec 18 1986 21:07 | 9 |
| Count me with those who wish male-type people would show a
little more restraint before noting (and be especially slow to
start topics). The moderators have shown extraordinary generosity
by allowing us to even read this notesfile, let alone contribute.
Please, gents, we are guests here. Our hosts (hostesses) have made
us welcome; it is our responsibility to be gracious and deferential
in accepting their hospitality.
joe
|
139.20 | | SWSNOD::RPGDOC | Dennis the Menace | Fri Dec 19 1986 11:03 | 13 |
| RE: .5 "new convention needed"
Here 'tis -
(.)
|
139.22 | Write in the style you love to read... | NY1MM::LEIGH | But why New York? | Sun Dec 21 1986 16:20 | 30 |
| Re: < Note 139.17 by EXCELL::SHARP "Don Sharp, Digital Telecommunications" >
> ... I think it means that noters who don't share all the values the
> WOMANNOTES community holds dear are making their presence felt. And that
> makes it uncomfortable for those of us who liked things the way they were.
>People have a way of figuring out what the culture and style of a NOTES
>conference is, and finding their own way to fit in. Otherwise they stop
>participating. Some people take longer than others, and some are more
>stylistically flexible than others, but sooner or later things seem to work
>out.
I've been read-only in this file for several months. I have to count myself
as one who liked things as they were ... very open, very friendly, non-flaming,
with a dash of humor thrown in.
I agree that the 'culture' of a notesfile affects what new noters feel they
can write into it. It works both ways, though -- if the culture begins
to change, old participants may be driven out!
In the case of WOMANNOTES, the 'feel' of *new* notes has changed drastically
in the past couple of weeks. The future 'culture' of this file will be
determined by whether old participants stay around and try to continue the
old tone of the file or whether they give up and leave.
I think that those of us who have enjoyed this file without writing have
a responsibility to *begin writing more* in order to preserve what we've
been enjoying. I'm going to try, anyway.
Bob
|
139.23 | Opposite sex denied access. | NEXUS::MORGAN | Walk in Balance... | Sun Dec 21 1986 21:24 | 4 |
| From my experience with mens and womens groups, more seems to get
done when the opposite sex is denied access.
Mikie
|
139.24 | is it trivial in the eye of the beholder | BIZET::NELSON | | Mon Dec 22 1986 10:54 | 4 |
| Cold feet didn't seem trivial to me.
That was one of my ex-husband's complaints about me. There isn't
much I could do about it.
|
139.26 | Why Iam here | MORGAN::BARBER | | Tue Dec 23 1986 12:22 | 30 |
| - 1 I agree with Bob in that, I as a man am a guest in
this file. I have a tendency to believe myself to be
a intelligent and learned person thru all of the inputs
and experiences Ive been through kicking (and being kicked)
around this world over the last 39 years.
Does this mean I know it all, hell no, life itself is
one of the constant learning experiences we all go through.
Probably the most important things my father told me was
"that life is the worlds best, but most brutal teacher ".
Since I was brought up in a male orientated world (at the
time) I now know better that women are not a lesser person
because they are female.
The main reason Ive become involved in this file is simply
that Iam not always right. I sometimes slip into that male
dominated noise mode of thinking that I was brought up with.
If I was that good at always understanding people then why
have I had the problems that Ive had in the relations Ive
been involved in. Iam here because I wish to better understand
a womans perspective on a variety of different subjects.
Hopefully this will help me to be a more rounded person.
To maybe make some new friends and better handle things
in future relations. Sure some of the questions I may
get blasted on but then again just like the old Skippy
peanut show " You ( I ) asked for it. :-)
Bob B
|
139.27 | yet another opinion | CSC32::KOLBE | Liesl-Colo Spgs- DTN 522-5681 | Wed Dec 24 1986 14:47 | 14 |
| I also enjoy the humorous and sometimes trivial notes. One of the
reasons I never felt I could be a "feminist" was their hardline
towards humor. Certainly humor and triviality can be used as weapons
but I doubt that is the intention of the noters in this file.
I also feel that the male presence keeps us from turning this notes
file into a bitch session that feeds on itself. Sometimes when people
make gross generalities they need to be reminded that exceptions
do exist. Anything that makes us examine ourselves and our attitudes
is beneficial.
To quote Grace Hopper "A ship is safe in the harbor but thats not
what it's made for", we need a notes file that makes us think not
one that is "safe". Liesl
|
139.28 | | MANANA::MCKEEN | Don't take NH for granite! | Mon Dec 29 1986 12:36 | 8 |
| re .27
> I also feel that the male presence keeps us from turning this
> notes file into a bitch session that feeds on itself.
Can you explain this statement please?
Karen.
|
139.29 | positive/negative feedback | CSC32::KOLBE | Liesl-Colo Spgs- DTN 522-5681 | Tue Dec 30 1986 20:11 | 15 |
| re .28 What I was refering to was the tendancy of a group of persons
(doesn't have to be male or female) to start on a subject and get
carried away. The most common would be the work related bitch session
where everyone gets together and starts slicing the boss or the
company and pretty soon people start convincing themsleves that
everything or everybody is terrible to them. It always helps to
have someone with a different point of view than the group. This
does not mean the group may not have a reason to be unhappy but
it can help to keep it in perspective. There is some value to positive
thinking and not always dwelling on the negative. Lets face it,
we are the elite of the world when it comes to problems. We have
food every day and a place to sleep and a job. There are inequalities
between men and women and I resent some of them greatly but overall
my life is pretty good and I'd rather not forget that. Liesl
|
139.30 | The pursuit of trivia | STING::FIELDS | | Wed Dec 23 1987 19:21 | 6 |
| What is trivial to some helps me understand how others think and
relate in an already over-complicated world. After all, I am here
to learn more about the female side of life and the cold hands issue
may help me out someday, don't know how but...
Tom
|