T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
62.1 | Men Too? | VAXUUM::DYER | Define `Quality' | Sat Aug 16 1986 20:33 | 6 |
| I'm not on the other side of any aisle, as far as I know,
but I do have a thought.
Have you considered that some male coworkers might find
the closeness troubling? It might be appropriate to extend
your new habit to include new male coworkers.
<_Jym_>
|
62.2 | Safer not to | SUPER::MATTHEWS | Don't panic | Tue Aug 19 1986 23:57 | 11 |
| The collection of pamphlets outside the ZK health office had an article
on touching -- specifically, what sort of touching is appropriate in
professional situations. It might be helpful. If that article isn't
there any more, I think I might have kept a copy.
In any case, at work you're safer not touching, as some people
find it discomforting. It's definitely a personal issue -- I
happen to have been "thorny" since childhood, and I don't think
it's sex- or gender-related.
Val
|
62.3 | I'm just a hired gun in the war on literacy. | SWSNOD::RPGDOC | Have pen, will travel | Wed Aug 20 1986 11:58 | 13 |
| Last year I worked on a contract assignment as a take-a-nickel writer
at the Electric Boat division of General Dynamics, and had a cubicle
across from an old salt, former submariner who was very physical.
Not only where we both ex-navy men, but it turned out we shared
the same hometown, though a generation apart. Usually I have a
lot of trouble giving and receiving simple affection, but I found
it hard to resist loving this guy as a shipmate when he'd put his
arm on my shoulder and go into his Wallae Beery imitation.
I'm no Lou Buscaglia fan but I think it's a shame sometimes that
we have to be so up tight at work. Of course, as a "guest worker"
I have to be especially careful not to give any wrong impression.
|
62.4 | Particular about touching | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | | Wed Aug 20 1986 13:00 | 9 |
|
Genuine affection between friends is fine, but I think people have
to respect the fact that nobody has the right to touch anybody in
any way who doesn't want to be touched. No matter what comes naturally
to us we have to always remember to consider the rights of others.
Lorna
|
62.5 | | BARTOK::MEEHAN | | Wed Aug 20 1986 14:44 | 6 |
| I agree with Lorna -- touching is not an innate right. Just because
a person considers herself or himself to be physical does not mean
that she or he has the right to touch others at will. I love to both touch
and be touched, but not by every random person who happens to have the urge.
....Margaret
|
62.6 | I try not to be pushy | DSSDEV::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Wed Aug 20 1986 19:26 | 44 |
| Please don't think I feel I have a particular right to do things
that others object to. I don't. I try quite a bit be aware of
the needs and preferences of others. Some of us are stand-offish
and some of us are more "touchy-feely". Some of us are quite
constrained and others quite out-going. I try always to do
what's right by others, but to do so I really need to know what
that is.
Understand that it isn't just an issue of touching. It's a
question of intimacy in general. We can give unintended offense
but standing too close, by using overly familiar language or
forms of address, by discussing personal topics or by all sorts
of things. One might solve this by always maintaining one's
distance from all of one's co-workers. Never touch anyone,
always stand at least four feet away. Address everyone as
Mr. and Ms., never discuss personal matters. Never joke.
There are two things wrong with this. First off, some people
find stand-offishness offensive. If you're never intimate,
people think that you disapprove of them. The second problem is
that it just ain't no fun, and the team doesn't work as well.
Being able to be at ease with your coworkers, treating them as
friends is both very pleasant and very effective.
The trick is to find out where you are comfortable with each
different person. What is OK, what isn't. The problem is the
question of fear. If a woman thinks that an unwanted intimacy
(be it touching, physical space, personal compliments, forms of
address, or small talk) is a question of sexual harassment, she
is very like not to say anything. If she doesn't say anything,
if she justs suffers quietly through it, everyone loses.
I probably wasn't clear in my base note, but the main thrust of
my talk with female coworkers is just this: "I don't mean any
offense or disrespect in anything I say or do. If I do something
that you object to, please tell me. I will do everything I can
to stop doing it." The talk seems to work. I have comfortable
and pleasant relationships with people with widely differing
tastes and styles. At times I catch myself doing or saying what
I oughtn't. I stop cold and grin sheepishly, apologizing, if
appropriate." At least we know that it is an honest mistake, and
not malicious.
JimB.
|
62.7 | You're doing it right, Jim | TOPDOC::JAMES | | Thu Aug 21 1986 17:15 | 11 |
| Bravo for you, Jim. I come from a Mediterranean background, and
grew up with people who expressed themselves in a very outgoing
way. Far from being repulsed or frightened by such people, I tend
to bask in their warmth. Tend to miss it here in cold, cold New
England.
Another kudo for being so open in explaining to people who might
take offence.
Stel
|
62.8 | - from the other side - | SARAH::BUSDIECKER | | Thu Aug 21 1986 18:40 | 14 |
| I had a "touchy" friend doing so much more than was comfortable for me, even
my grandmother did it too much .... often for me it is how well I know the
person and how they are touching (or where !!!).
The best thing I've found is to do what comes naturally and trust that
others will do the same ... sometimes you may have to "feel" each person out
--- read what they're saying to you. It's the responsibility of the person
who doesn't like it just as much (I think more) than the person who is
doing it (although if you've had problems with it in the past, I really
think bringing it up is a good idea).
If it was easier to read people, we wouldn't have to worry about this (and
introverts probably wouldn't _be_!)
|
62.9 | The Lovin' Touch, where are you? | RSTS32::TABER | | Fri Aug 22 1986 13:11 | 28 |
| "...cold, cold New England.."???
Really????? I guess being born and bred I don't see that.... Maybe
you're not looking in the right places....
Anyway, I agree with JimB.'s approach. His concern is not that
he is a toucher, but that as a toucher he can be misunderstood.
I, too, am a toucher. I come from a long line of touchers. And,
when I was young and stupid, I let other people touch me. When
they chose to. In the manner they chose to. It made me uncomfortable
when my "personal space" boundaries were crossed, but, what the
Hell, who wants to make waves and shouldn't we just one friendly,
cozy society??
Then I learned the subtle art of understanding the difference between
honesty and harassment. Honest touching I now allow. Harassment
earns the perpatrator a sharp "Move it or lose it!".
As a result I am more careful about my touching. I now realize
that not everyone views my touching in the same way....
And I don't touch at work -- I have enough problems without inviting
more. Except once, I will admit I hugged a friend in her office,
but that was during a highly emotional moment and we both needed
it right then....
bugsy
|
62.10 | | ULTRA::THIGPEN | | Fri Aug 22 1986 13:41 | 22 |
| re .9:
I, too, was raised in New England, and for a long while could not
understand why we are thought to be cold and unfriendly. I now
think that we are not those things, but are perceived to be 'cause
as a rule we tend to be more reserved than people from other parts
of the country.
About touching in general, like .9 I have learned to distinguish
between the friendly and the come-on approach.
One of the things that amazed me when I was pregnant was that people
I didn't know, even people I didn't like (and who knew it!) felt
perfectly uninhibited about patting my belly. Most would never
have taken such a liberty at any other time. That really bothered
me! It's hard to rebuff such advances; everyone seems to love and
feel protective towards a pregnant woman, and incidently tiny babies
(see related note, this conference). I finally decided that such
concern must be built into the species (some other primate species
have similar behaviours), and that patting a pregnant woman's belly
is something like rubbing the Buddha's belly for good luck; it is
usually not meant to be offensive, but is offered as an expression
of affection. I didn't like it, though.
|
62.11 | The experts speak | HARDY::MATTHEWS | Don't panic | Fri Aug 22 1986 14:08 | 42 |
| Okay, I dug out the article. It appears to be from Glamour, so give it
as much credence as you like... Perhaps this is a cold and clinical way
to deal with an emotional response, but you may want to distinguish
among different kinds of touching, and use the touches that are least
likely to be misinterpreted. From the article:
HEAD: a pat is seen as condescending: "I'm the adult, you're the
child."
NECK/SHOULDER: Touches here are too friendly.
SHOULDER: A firm pat conveys friendship and support.
GROOMING GESTURES: Whether straightening a tie or brushing away
lint, the touch can be interpreted as patronizing.
ELBOW: A touch adds emphasis to your message.
HAND: A momentary touch reassures.
HIP: Any touch below the waist carries sexual overtones.
[The article has a few more suggestions, but in general it's
inconclusive -- I guess this is a tough problem. It says you are never
wrong *not* to touch, but the experts quoted have varying opinions on
what constitutes an appropriate touch. Some other tips from the
article:]
Don't use touch to get someone's attention. Tapping people on the
shoulder while they're talking or concentrating will only serve
to distract and irritate them.
Bosses should avoid touching their subordinates while criticizing
them, even when the criticism is constructive.
Do not initiate touching someone in a higher position, with the
exception of handshakes.
Be especially careful about touching someone in pressured situations.
At such times, even well-intended gestures can backfire.
Val
|
62.12 | Scare tactics? | SQM::RAVAN | | Fri Aug 22 1986 15:25 | 19 |
| re .10:
Miss Manners offered a tongue-in-cheek method for dealing with
unwanted tummy-patting. The mother-to-be simply jerks back suddenly,
gasping and clutching her stomach, as if the unwelcome advance may
have startled her into premature labor.
(To be strictly honest, Miss Manners does not *recommend* this method,
but points out that, if tried, it ought to discourage the tummy-patter
from molesting any more pregnant women...)
Concerning touching in general, I suppose I'm one of the "distant"
people. I feel that physical closeness is only appropriate - and
satisfying - with people I trust and care about, and to get too
close to someone I don't know or don't particularly care for seems
to cheapen it. (I was raised mostly in Louisiana and Wyoming, so
I don't know what that says about geographical differences.)
-b
|
62.13 | | KALKIN::BUTENHOF | Approachable Systems | Fri Aug 22 1986 16:55 | 22 |
| I'm not much of a toucher either... it took quite a while
to get used to the fact that my sister-in-law wanted to hug
and kiss me whenever we got together (note that since I've
lived in Mass. and NH during this time, while they've been
in Ohio, this has never been very often). I felt very
uncomfortable until I finally accepted that that was just
the way she was (although there may have been more to it,
since she's admitted she was "trying very hard" to make me
like her, since my brother and I have always been very close).
I'm not at all sure how I'd deal with someone at work behaving
like that, and I'd rather not find out...
It's another problem like language. You have to walk a very
fine line, because some people are as much insulted by your
keeping a distance as others are by getting too close. There's
generally *some* signals when you're treading the edge of
the line in either direction, and you just have to learn
to be sensitive to that. Sometimes I can read the signals,
sometimes not... I suppose that's how it is with everyone.
/dave
|
62.14 | THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE... | MTV::HENDRICKS | Holly Hendricks | Wed Aug 27 1986 10:53 | 35 |
| I never wanted people to touch me as a child. It felt awful to
me. I HATED being made to kiss relatives and usually managed to
make everyone feel terrible about it if coerced. (Little girls
are supposed to like to kiss and hug people, right?) I really didn't
even want my parents to touch me. I never knew why, I just knew
that I felt like I was going to die if anyone touched me.
Later on, through work in therapy, I discovered a few long repressed
incidents of sexual abuse, and began to be able to deal with touching
in a rational manner. If I had a child, though, I would want that
child to be the one who chose if and when and how she was touched.
Ellen Bass wrote a very interesting children's book (available at
New Words Bookstore in Cambridge, Mass.) about a little girl who
felt uncomfortable because the man at the grocery store always patted
her head when he saw her. She liked him but didn't want him to
touch her. The mother in the story taught her daughter to say to
the man in the grocery store, "I like joking with you, but I don't
want you to touch me". If I remember the story correctly when the
little girl actually talked with him, he was so surprised that she
had to repeat it twice. He then said, "Oh, OK, I didn't know".
If only that book had been available in the 1950's...
I ended up spending several years in a wholistic/personal growth/new
age community. I learned to enjoy touching, and to be able to say
no when I didn't want it without offending people. For me that
is the key!
At work I always try to err on the conservative side, but there
are a few people whom it seems all right to touch, and I do. I
imagine there are less issues involved when the woman initiates
the touching than when a man does!
Holly
|
62.15 | HUGS | OURVAX::JEFFRIES | | Fri Nov 14 1986 11:32 | 10 |
| I am from a very HUGGY,KISSEY, family. I am very comfortable with
family and loved ones, and we do a lot of touching. My exSO had
a difficult time understanding this. He was not a toucher and was
uncomfortable in there company. (note: was uncomfortable). As our
relationship grew and he was exposed more and more to my family,
he warmed up. I need a lot of hugs. I demanded a lot of hugs from
him, and he responded well. Now after several years and several
miles, he calls me for phone hugs. We are still good friends, and
he says the one of the best parts of our relationship was the hugs.
|
62.16 | families and hugs | ZEPPO::LEMAIRE | Sarah Hosmer Lemaire | Fri Nov 14 1986 12:20 | 11 |
| My father is huggy kissey, my mother is not at all. I am more like
my father - I love hugs. My in-laws are also very warm and huggy,
including my husband. So whenever he sees my mother, he takes it
upon himself to give her a big hug and kiss. At first, she was
a little uncomfortable but Tom was determined to "convert" her. I
think she is more comfortable with it now - like she enjoys getting
hugs from this 30 year old - it's been fun to watch. I guess it
helps that she's quite fond of him as a son-in-law.
SHL
|