T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
44.1 | Professional Experiences | MIRFAK::TILLSON | | Tue Jul 15 1986 13:44 | 19 |
|
I have had an experience where I "gave in" to a bit of sexism.
It involved a raquetball mishap which gave me a deep cut on my upper
lip. I went to an emergency medical center, and was trying to decide
if I should let the doctor on call stitch my lip or to call a plastic
surgeon instead. The doctor I saw was a woman, and old enough to
have grown up in an age where young girls were expected to learn
needlework. I let her stich my lip, and indeed, she made tiny,
delicate stitches, and I have no scar. The (male) doctor who removed
them griped about how small they were, and what trouble they were
to remove! I think if the doctor on call had been male, I would
have felt far less inclined to let him do the job, and might have
called the plastic surgeon. I still felt a little uncomfortable
with what I observed to be blatant sexism, but it's hard to be
objective sometimes.
Rita
|
44.2 | Nonsense! | RAJA::BROOMHEAD | Ann A. Broomhead, no phone | Thu Jul 17 1986 14:00 | 2 |
| That was not sexism; that was a Holmesian inference.
Ann B.
|
44.3 | | COLORS::TARBET | Margaret Mairhi | Thu Jul 17 1986 14:14 | 1 |
| <heheheheheheh> lovely, Ann.
|
44.4 | Thanks! | MIRFAK::TILLSON | | Thu Jul 17 1986 15:05 | 6 |
|
Thanks a trillion, Ann - I feel much better!
Rita
|
44.5 | | ELMO::JESSOP | | Mon Aug 25 1986 13:58 | 13 |
|
Hi Terza!
I've had occasions delivering packages where I thought
the woman I was delivering to was a secretary, and she wasn't.
I felt terrible! it probably didn't make her feel to well either!
It's only happened a couple of times though. for the most part
I can tell, and I know many of the people in the facility that I
work in.
Mike
|
44.6 | | ELMO::JESSOP | | Mon Aug 25 1986 14:00 | 8 |
|
And I'm NOT saying there is anything wrong with being a secretary!!
It's just that if you're a senior software engineer, and someone
comes up to you and hands you a pile of stuff to sign for (assuming
that you are a secretary) you probably wouldn't like it!
Mike
|
44.7 | | ULTRA::ZURKO | Seeing eye person for blind dogs | Mon Aug 25 1986 18:44 | 12 |
| Well, I'll bite. What's different about how you hand a pile of
stuff to a secretary?
The only times I "didn't like be treated like a secretary" was when
I'd pick up their phone, and get treated to "honey" and "sweetie",
and have the other person on the line be exceptionally rude when
I didn't start transcribing their message immediately, or I didn't
know exactly where so-and-so was. I felt I wasn't treated like
a human being! I sure hope its different for the secretaries here
at DEC!
Mez
|
44.8 | You asked for it | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | | Tue Aug 26 1986 11:23 | 14 |
|
Re .6, how can you "tell the difference" between a secretary and
a software engineer?? Is it that we look stupider or that we dress
better? You know, you don't have to get an engineering degree to
be a member of the human race. Most of us were born that way.
Remember that when dealing with people. Hopefully, for both of
us, you'll never have to deliver anything to my office.
P.S.
I can usually tell non-technical, non-management men at DEC because
they're the ones who make it obvious when they leer at passing women!!
|
44.9 | just a second, here | COOKIE::ZANE | Don't read this line. | Tue Aug 26 1986 12:59 | 32 |
| (Hi Mike!)
(Re: .8)
I don't know that anyone can tell the difference between a secretary and
a software engineer just by looking, although that could certainly be a
topic for debate. (More on that below). I think the point Mike was trying
to make was that he had a mindset for delivering a package to a secretary
and was surprised to discover that the person was, in fact, an engineer.
He was talking about his feeling of surprise, not throwing slurs about
secretaries. (I'm being forward in interpreting Mike's words -- am I close,
Mike?)
I believe some people are too sensitive to labels, both the person doing the
labelling and the person being labelled.
As far as telling the differences just by looking, there are definite
activities (certainly!) that we associate with secretaries and definite
activities that we associate with engineers. In addition to that, there
are certain attitudes we associate with engineers and secretaries that seem
to "stick out" all over a person. (I'm donning my asbestos suit). NOTE:
Neither activities nor attitudes give us the right to treat any individual
badly in either a professional or personal sense! But, being aware of our
own *initial* feelings before we do anything with them is a major step towards
improving our relations with others.
'Nuff said,
Terza
|
44.10 | And, just a second here | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | | Tue Aug 26 1986 15:20 | 6 |
|
Re .8, well, you can certainly excuse a lot of what's wrong in this
world by calling other people sensitive to labels.
Lorna
|
44.11 | - FLAMING - | SARAH::BUSDIECKER | | Tue Aug 26 1986 19:34 | 12 |
| Re .8
> I can usually tell non-technical, non-management men at DEC because
> they're the ones who make it obvious when they leer at passing women!!
I'm fairly new at DEC, so I may be missing something, but personally I am
offended by your comment -- some maintenance men (I could tell by their
uniforms or what they were doing, not _leering_) that I have come in contact
with are more friendly than most of the other people I don't know at DEC.
Perhaps I am missing something because I'm not the type of person people
(male or female) usually leer at, but I really think a little courtesy to
the rest of the human race is in order.
|
44.12 | What I overheard once | ULTRA::THIGPEN | | Tue Aug 26 1986 23:21 | 10 |
| Overheard in a women's bathroom in MR1, several years ago:
"It's getting so you can't tell the engineers from the secretaries
anymore!"
"Oh, yes, you can: the engineers don't dress up and don't wear makeup."
Well, it applies to me, but not to all woman engineers I know.
Labels/humor/stereotypes/pick-your-own-noun go every which way.
|
44.13 | We all put on our pants one leg at a time! | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | | Wed Aug 27 1986 13:31 | 21 |
|
Re .12, obviously the point is that how can anyone tell the
difference between women engineers and women secretaries, and further
more why should it be important? Of course, all secretaries neither
dress better or look stupider than engineers! As long as each person's
boss and co-workers know what the person's job is so they get the
correct assignments, etc., why should it matter?
I can't understand why a woman engineer would be insulted to have
someone think she was a secretary. Afterall, it's not the same
thing as being mistaken for excrement, is it? How would a woman
engineer feel, if she heard that a woman product manager was horribly
insulted to have someone think she was an engineer, and in turn
how would that product manager feel if she found out that a woman
cost center manager was agast at having someone think she was a
mere product manager!! There's always somebody with a better job,
but in the end we are all people, and we all deserve to be treated
with equal courtesy.
Lorna
|
44.14 | | ULTRA::THIGPEN | | Wed Aug 27 1986 14:44 | 11 |
| It's NOT that I am insulted if someone I don't know assumes my role
is the one s/he needs filled at the moment, and doesn't really know
or care what I do.
It's when by boss, an engineer in charge of a group of engineers
(including me) asks me how well I type, and explains that there
is this list of 300,000 error messages whose error numbers must
be replaced by text, and the engineer who wrote the software just
doesn't have time right now to type in his own error texts...
This is a true story, happened to me in MR, and the man didn't know
why I should object.
|
44.15 | it's not the job it's the stereotype | CADSYS::SULLIVAN | vote NO on #1 - Pro-Choice | Wed Aug 27 1986 14:59 | 24 |
| RE: .13
> I can't understand why a woman engineer would be insulted to have
> someone think she was a secretary.
You're right, it *shouldn't* be an insult, but I have gotten
bogged down in questioning WHY did they assume I was a secretary.
It's the same problem of that being a traditional "woman's job",
and I get annoyed that they could only see a woman (not me in
particular) in a "woman's job", not a traditional "man's job".
The problem is that the reverse doesn't happen. Do secretaries get
mistaken for engineers a lot? Do men EVER get mistaken for
secretaries? It's not a question of being mistaken for someone
whose job is different, it's being placed in a sexist role, and
unfortunately the secretary job has been one of the few jobs that
has been "OK" for women for years.
I have nothing against being a secretary, I also get insulted when
people assume I do the cooking for my family. I'm insulted because
people make assumptions about me because I'm a woman, and a lot
of these assumptions are sexist stereotypes. I will *not* be
insulted by someone assuming I'm a secretary or any other job
because I'm doing some task that can be associated with that job.
...Karen
|
44.16 | | COIN::HAKIM | | Wed Aug 27 1986 15:55 | 7 |
| re: 13
You can't understand why...maybe the same reason that you are put
out by the term girl....you found it offensive.
Ann
|
44.17 | Well... | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | | Wed Aug 27 1986 18:05 | 29 |
|
Well, as a secretary, *I* get insulted when people give me work
to do for them that has nothing whatsoever to do with Digital.
For example, there was the engineer that asked me to copy a whole
bunch of stuff that concerned the sale of his condominium. It took
me 2 hours to copy all that stuff. I couldn't help but wonder why
DEC should pay me to do that for him, and whether he would have
been willing to pay me out of his own pocket to do the job. A lot
of people treat secretaries as though they were some sort of personal
attendants who are here to satisfy *any* need they may happen to
have!
Another thing that bothers me is when people *assume* that just
because I am a secretary I must run the coffee set-up in my current
work area. The fact is I don't drink coffee and am not really sure
how to make it in those drip machines. Actually the coffee is run
by one of the engineering managers, so I just look at them blankly
and say, "I'm sorry, I don't have anything to do with the coffee."
They are somewhat taken aback.
People also seem to assume secretaries can sew on buttons and such
things. What do they want a mother, or a secretary? I hate to
dew and in my personal life have been fortunate in finding men who
can sew!
Nobody likes to be stereotyped.
Lorna
|
44.18 | SECRETARY OR MOTHER? | FULTON::LEVITAN | | Thu Aug 28 1986 11:51 | 38 |
| I am a secretary and unfortunately, in our area, so many of our
coffee supplies have been stolen that we've had to store them in
a locked cabinet. I have no objection to making coffee -- especially
first thing in the morning since I need coffee to get going. But
during the day, if a manager comes by to tell me that we are out,
I calmly give him/her the key. They are sometimes surprised - and
one manager told me he didn't have time to make it. I then replied
that I was rather busy and just didn't know when I'd get around
to doing it. I then left the key on my desk. When I stepped away,
the key was gone ,the coffee was made - and the key left in front
of the coffee machine. I just laughed - children will have their
little play!
As to copying non-DEC material for a manager - especially 2 hours
worth -- again, depending upon how busy you were - and who the manger
was -- it was up to you to determine what, if anything, you should/
could have said. Frankly, if it was me, I would have made darn
sure that I was officially busy and could ONLY have done the work
for him/her during my lunch or after work as long as he/she knew
that you were going to be paid overtime. After all, what kind of
FAVOR did the manager do for you?
Do managers want secretaries or mothers??? In most cases, especially
the managers that hire the mature woman, they want both! I draw
the line at many things - especially sewing. I don't do floors,
walls, windows or sewing. I find one of the most important attributes
a secretary - especially one of 40 can have is a smile and a sense
of humor. We have a manager who sits close by me and is a slob
in the respect that his daily newspapers ends up on the floor -
a few days worth. It annoyed me to the point that I managed to
find the opportunity to tell a co-worker an incident that my son
told me when he was in basic training. There was a big sign in
the barracks that said - YOUR MOTHER ISN'T HERE - PICK UP AFTER
YOURSELF. We sort of laughed and talked about how sloppy come people
are. It's amazing - the newspapers don't accumulate any more.
As I said - some people NEVER let the child in them go - until it's
pointed out.
|
44.19 | Some men get mistaken for secretaries | DSSDEV::BURROWS | Jim Burrows | Thu Aug 28 1986 19:30 | 35 |
| I don't know about the other guys, but every now and then I have
been mistaken for a secretary, and I always thought I looked
like an engineer. I suspect it's because if I need something
done, I do it myself, and if I'm near a ringing phone I answer
it. People around the copier or answering someone else's phone
are obvious secretaries or something.
It can be quite frustrating how people make assumptions and
can't get past them. Many times I've answered a phone, asked the
person to wait while I find a pen or something and received a
lecture about being better organized and not making important
people wait. "Heh, I was walkin' past Fred's office and the
phone wasn't being answered. You'da prefered I let it ring? Now
that I've found his post-it pad, what was your name again."
Much of what you see when women are mistaken for secretaries or
when secretaries aren't treated with the proper dignity is, in
my opinion, plain old lack of consideration, and ego-centrism.
Some people just feel outrageously important (or maybe they just
wish they were). They don't bother to think, or to consider
other's views. The most they've learned is that you've got to be
careful around men in suits, 'cause they're probably really
important. It's not that they hate or feel superior to women per
se, but that they are afraid of (or "respect") a certain class
of men.
It IS grossly unfair that women get less of this kind of
"respect", but I think the root problem is the number of
incosiderate self-important yahoos loose in the world. Even if
they learn that women in suits are likely to be important an
grudgingly defered to there will, by definition, still be more
people that they treat like dirt than ones they treat with
civility.
JimB.
|
44.20 | role reversal? | ULTRA::THIGPEN | | Fri Aug 29 1986 10:13 | 7 |
| I remember once in MR when our regular secretary was on vacation,
our group used a tag to fill her role. I walked by and did a double
take - the temporary secretary was a man in his early twenties,
a Worcester-hippie-type. I remember feeling like I had been caught
doing something embarassing, because the rational part of
my mind knew that this reaction to a male secretary was not in accord
with my principles! I guess we all have work to do...
|
44.21 | As long as I never get mistaken for a man | APEHUB::STHILAIRE | | Tue Sep 02 1986 11:30 | 28 |
| Re .19, I agree that the basic problem is that there are too many
"inconsiderate self-important yahoos" out there - and they aren't
all men either!!!
Regarding answering/be interrupted on the phone, I've noticed that
whenever I'm on the phone if someone comes into my office they just
start *talking* to me about what they want. They seem to *assume*
that because i'm a secretary I can't be talking about anything
important. There have been times when I've been in the middle of
booking international flights and had someone barge in and start
shouting about some copies or slides they need!! I was saying,
"Pardon me, what was that flight number?" and the person in my office
is shouting, "I SAID I need 2 copies and slides in 1/2 an hour!"
But, whenever *I* go into a managers or engineers office and *they're
* on the phone, they see that it's "only a secretary" and usually
turn around and refuse to look at me so that I'll go away. They
have *no* idea what I'm there for and I've been a secretary long
enough to have a good idea what's worth interrupting someone for.
I have fantasies about being ignored by a manager and then finally
telling him, "Oh, by the way, I was going to tell you but you were
*busy*. Two hours ago I just found out that your entire family
was killed when your house exploded this morning. I thought that
you might want to know before you reach the driveway tonite! Excuse
me for being so rude as to bother you." :-) (my very first smiley
face - exciting isn't it)
Lorna
|
44.22 | | 7360::MCCALLION | marie | Tue Sep 02 1986 14:33 | 12 |
| RE:17
When I interviewed for this job I told him "I DON"T DO COFFEE!"..
I don't drink it, it won't make it, clean the area, buy it or collect
money for it. He said "no problem"...... It's one of those issues
that secretaries were adament about in the 70's...
RE: 21
How true. One time I was meeting someone in WMO and when I arrived
he said "I just called your office and no one answered" and I said
"if I'm not there the phone isn't answered".
|
44.23 | | ELMO::JESSOP | | Wed Sep 10 1986 13:22 | 12 |
| \
re.8 and .9
Yes Terza! Thank you! I knew I shouldn't have written anything,
I always have trouble getting the point I have in mind across.
I'm trying to say that, well, around here, I deliver to the secretaries
for the most part, then they redisburse their groups stuff to them.
Does that help any??
Mike
|
44.24 | Grrrrr! | ELMO::JESSOP | | Wed Sep 10 1986 13:34 | 15 |
|
re .8 to .15
Waitaminutewaitaminutewaitaminute!!!!!!!!!
I don't care who works WHAT job! Whether your a secretary,
a manager, an engineer or the president of these United States!!!!
I go for personalities, not job descriptions.
Besides I DID say that it was all a mistake, and that I WAS
embarrassed. Didn't I?!! I do believe I did, and if I didn't,
I am now. Is that pretty much clear cut? Or do I have to elaborate
more?
Mike ;-(
|
44.25 | YEARS AGO | OURVAX::JEFFRIES | | Tue Nov 11 1986 15:11 | 15 |
| Several years ago, when I worked for another large company, I applied
for a position that was posted. The position was being filled by
a male, but he was being promoted. I was accepted , was given my
start date, but when I arrived that Momday morning the clerk who
had assisted the male employee was also gone. I asked the hiring
manager where she was and he said that she also took another job.
I asked who was going to do the typing that was necessary, he looked
at me with amazement and said you will. I politely informed him
that I didn"t know how. He said that's why we hired you, what do
you mean you don't type. Not once in the interview was I asked
if I could type.It was assumed that because I was female that I
could type. Needless to say a new clerk was hired.
This was also back in the era when a lot of jobs were still being
posted male and female.
|
44.26 | not TOO many years ago | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Tue Nov 11 1986 16:37 | 6 |
| re .25
Not so very long ago, when I was in high school, my mother warned
me to never admit to being able to type, or I would never attain
success as a professional engineer. She knew!
/Charlotte
|
44.27 | typing makes the world go 'round | KALKIN::BUTENHOF | Approachable Systems | Wed Nov 12 1986 16:13 | 20 |
| .26: Actually, I'd be lost if I couldn't type. I know some
Software Engineers make do with hunt & peck, but I'm very glad I
learned to type well. Typing and computers are virtually
inseparable thus far... every engineer (at least) should know
how. Computers are everywhere, and not knowing how to type is
a lot like not being able to write, or talk... and getting more
so all the time. Quick and accurate typists have a distinct
advantage.
One reason a lot of top executives won't use computers is
that they refuse to learn to type. It's "beneath them".
Secretaries type. Managers... well, I guess they're just
supposed to sit around and look dumb while the secretary
runs the business for 1/10th their pay.
Assuming you're a secretary because you can type is about
as absurd as assuming you're an actor because you can speak
aloud... and for much the same reasons.
/dave
|
44.28 | Can't touch-type, but... | HPSCAD::WALL | I see the middle kingdom... | Thu Nov 13 1986 11:05 | 14 |
|
re: .27
I wouldn't make that generalization. I write LISP code -- a LOT
of lisp code, and touch typing wouldn't help me. I'm not a touch
typist, but I type fairly quickly because I've been playing with
keyboards since I was ten. I'm not as fast as a touch typist, but
I'm not sure how much it would help.
Not that I'm putting down people who can type, which has always
sort of amazed me.
DFW
|
44.29 | even more off the topic, I'm afraid... | KALKIN::BUTENHOF | Approachable Systems | Thu Nov 13 1986 11:52 | 23 |
| .28: You already admitted that a touch typist can be faster than
you. Which means that such a person could write LISP code
faster than you. People who write code "on the fly" have other
factors slowing them down than just typing speed... but few
people do that *all* the time.
Do you comment your code? That's straight english text,
and you know what to say. You could touch type that much
more quickly. Do you write release notes, or even memos
to tech writers on what you changed?
Do you write NOTES in notes conferences? The faster you
can whip these suckers off, the more time you have left in
your day for writing LISP code... :-)
As for your final remark... my first exposure to a typewriter
was typing class in jr. high. So I've never really done
anything *but* touch typing. What amazes *me* is how fast
some of these two finger hunt & peck typers can go! But
it still strikes me as learning how to push your car really
fast, instead of getting the engine fixed... :-)
/dave
|
44.30 | Brain -> fingers -> keyboard | TOPDOC::SLOANE | Notable notes from -bs- | Thu Nov 13 1986 13:09 | 8 |
| I'm a tech writer and also do outside freelance writing.
Believe me, the slow part about writing is not getting the words
through your fingers to the keyboard. The slow part is getting the
words your brain. The rest is gravy.
-bs
|
44.31 | Alright, so maybe.... | HPSCAD::WALL | I see the middle kingdom... | Thu Nov 13 1986 14:51 | 14 |
|
Well, if you learned to touch type on an LK201 keyboard, it might
go faster. VAXLisp uses most of them weird characters you don't
find on a regular keyboard. Not to mention what you have to do
to use function keys.
Again, not to decry touch typing, although the most famous typist
I know, Harlan Ellison, types 120 wpm, no errors, with two fingers
on a manual typewriter.
I'm also an amateur fiction writer, and -bs's observation about
getting the words in your brain is sooth.
DFW
|
44.32 | I DID learn to type, just didn't ADMIT it | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Fri Nov 14 1986 12:12 | 13 |
| Hey, folks, I didn't say I did not LEARN to touch type, only that I
didn't ADMIT to having learned it on the first few rounds of job
applications I ever filled out. Being able to type is big help,
but having my first paying summer job be as a Fortran programmer rather
than as a clerk was also a big help. That is now long enough ago
that I don't put experience that old on my resume, but I still think
Mother was right. Her own degree was in mathematics, but she worked
as a secretary before we were born; it was tough to get a professional
position in mathematics thirty years ago. My degrees are in computer
science.
/Charlotte
|
44.33 | I am a PROFESSIONAL secretary | ADVAX::ENO | | Mon Dec 08 1986 11:14 | 27 |
| I've had an interesting experience in the group I'm with at DEC
as an Admin Secretary. Two of the managers, and several of the
engineers I work for don't seem to understand that part of my job
includes "grunt" work -- copying and running errands, etc -- and
they constantly apologize for giving me work to do (they've never
had a *professional* secretary before). I find this very annoying!
After all, I'm in this profession by choice, not because I'm stupid
or uneducated (3.95 GPA in getting my B.S.), or because I can't
do anything else -- both assumptions I've dealt with often.
I've also dealt frequently with the assumption that I'm a
*professional* (read non-administrative) employee. This certainly
doesn't bother me, and since I do my job well and PROFESSIONALLY,
it shouldn't be offensive if someone else assumes a "professional"
is an administrative/secretarial employee. However, if those
assumptions are based on the body inside the clothes rather than
the observed activity, I would be annoyed, too.
I think that the "pink ghetto" of secretarial careers would fade
away gradually if more "professionals" would bend to the point of
answering their own phones/making their own copies/SCHEDULING THEIR
TIME BETTER, and more secretaries would make it clear that they
are "professionals", not just empty minds pushing keys on a typewriter.
Initiative and quality work will make the title "administrative
assistant" mean something other than just a pat on the back.
|