T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
14.1 | hot buttons | WFRPRT::OPERATOR | | Tue May 06 1986 02:45 | 44 |
|
Note to one and all, especially <jym>, thank heavens your not in
the CLOSET, on this issue...
Where to begin, perhaps a few questions for each of us to answer.
Are you, your mom's, friends, loved ones dependent on, " good drugs",
those the doctor hands out to women like candy.How many women don't
have to ask Alice? How many of your friends, lovers, family chose
to be especially careful in public about their drinking, and in
private have become,"Mom the lush". The woman who is still able
to work, but not always there.
To often woman are given drugs to medicate them away from feelings
of rage, of terrible unacknowledged anger. Medicine believes in
giving us products for which little or no information is available
to warn us of possible "side effects". Just give the "little ladies
a pill", and they will be docile, will become good medical zombies.
What a great business...socially approved, medically sealed junkies.
Perhaps, it would be to out of me to say I've been a victim...But,
my rage and the abuse I've suffered is fuel to help to warn others.
Get out of the closet, open the medical chest in your bathroom...Have
any of those drugs stolen your life?
Is this adding any fuel to anyones fire?
Did any of your know that getting off some drugs can create a psychosis
in some patients. That the long term affect of those drugs most
often given to women are know to cause serious medical problem.
Bladder cancer,heart problems...
Doctor receive no more than two lectures about medication during
their internship...most if not all the information doctors and patients
have available to them comes from drug companies. The FDA admits
to an incestuous relationship with drug companies with respect to
the information they get about drug studies. When you have the time
reading the PDR about various drugs is very revealing...
Well, I guess I've been a bit heavy handed about this subject. At
least now I have the ability to think, to question before injestion...
I've opened this door, who else is inside? I'm just glad that I
can now own my anger and work beyond it...
Meg
|
14.2 | | PAUPER::KIMBROUGH | gailann, maynard, ma... | Tue May 06 1986 11:37 | 37 |
|
When my husband first left me I suffered a serious of "mini"
breakdowns... they were periods of which I would go into grave
depressions and sleep all the time. It was all I could do to get
through an eight hour work day. Well I kept all that anger bottled
up until I cropped an ulcer and then I figured it was time to see
a doctor. First I was given a series of medications for pain...
the ulcer was causing me real bad pain so I figured they were o.k.
also I was given three kinds of ulcer medication... One was to
tranquilize my stomach, one was tagamet for the actual condition
and the other was one to help me digest things thus avoiding pain.
I had been on this therapy for about a month... I was taking four
kinds of pills four to six times a day!!! I am not the most organized
person in the world and this was really confusing me!! Well the
kicker was here I was already so doped up that I often could not
tell you my own name and then I was prescribed anti-depressants
on top of everything else. I am telling you I never could have
imagined such horror as I experienced with those things!! I don't
know what is in them but I was a babbling fool while on them...
then I could not sleep so guess what I got next!.. sleeping pills..
Well this went on for close to a six month period.. a pill for this
a pill for that.. finally one day when I thought I would surely
go out of my mind I put them all in the toilet with the exception
of the tagamet because I really did need that for the ulcer... By
this time I had in my possession Valum, Codine, Perkasets, Bental,
anti depressants, sleeping pills and Tagamet!! I found a good family
counselor through Concord Family Services, learned to talk about
what was bothering me instead of drugging myself and eventually
worked things out without all those drugs.. I am telling you to
this day I am scared to death of anything more than a vitamin pill!
I was only 25 when I went through all of this..
never again!
later, gailann
|
14.3 | drugs, drugs, drugged | CLT::BUTENHOF | Approachable Systems | Tue May 06 1986 13:06 | 28 |
| We live in a drug culture. Maybe it's from the "recreational
drug" craze started in the 60s, and the medical profession
caught on that "people like drugs". Maybe it's because drugs
are "easier" for everyone involved (no surgery, no
hospitalization or long therapy sessions, etc.). Our society is
very much into immediate gratification; even large companies
frequently ignore their own long term goals in favor of short
term gain.
Drugs appear to be particularly popular in psychiatry. Maybe
it's an attempt to "legitimize" themselves by showing that
they have real physical things which can be treated by
established medical techniques (however useless some of the
treatments may be).
What's really unfortunate is that prescribing "a drug" is
so easy for the doctors that they seem to do it a bit too
casually. There are certainly cases where drugs are useful...
but I doubt that that accounts for even 50% of the cases where
they're prescribed.
The big question is what can be done by people who don't
*want* to be drugged up. Probably saying "I don't want drugs,
I want help" isn't going to do much good (and, of course,
at least *some* of the time, *some* of the drugs *may be*
helping, so how do you know where to draw the line?)
/dave
|
14.4 | Garbage In, Garbage Out... | PAMPAM::WYMAN | bob wyman | Tue May 06 1986 20:58 | 21 |
| As a male, I swore to myself that I would only "watch" this conference
and not contribute... However, one of MY hot-buttons has just been
hit and I'll break the rule for a moment.
The very idea of a "Women's Therapy Movement" is to me violently
sexist. I do not believe that anyone has ever been able to establish
any "natural" differences between the workings of the minds of men
and women. What has been established is that the "programming" of
these boxes is different. Society tends to load one pile of sh*t into
the minds of men and a slightly different pile of sh*t into the
minds of women. Do your programming right and you'll end up with
a man with the "psychology" of a woman or vice versa.
By isolating the "women" into the region of "Women's Therapy" you
simply continue to enforce the artificial, learned differences between
men and women. You are attacking the symptoms not the causes of the
problems. You are actually contributing to the perpetuation of the
subjugation of women. Separate but equal is no good in racial issues,
it should not be tolerated by feminists either.
bob wyman
|
14.5 | but you can't ignore problems, either... | CLT::BUTENHOF | Approachable Systems | Wed May 07 1986 09:00 | 19 |
| In general, Bob, I agree... however, there's another side.
Which is simply that adult women have already been programmed,
and therefore it may be that certain diagnostic/repair
techniques are more applicable to women than to men (and,
of course, vice versa).
We should try to avoid propagating the "difference programming"
on new people... but we still have to deal with existing
people. The issue of how to accept and deal with existing
programming while at the same time trying to say that
programming style shouldn't be used any more is obviously
somewhat complex... but what choice do we have? (Wow, this
topic's starting to sound like a computer conference :-)).
I have no way of judging whether the "Women's Therapy Movement"
is actually of any value to anyone... but I don't see anything
intrinsically vile about the concept.
/dave
|
14.6 | How Interesting | CIPHER::GREENBERG | | Wed May 07 1986 09:00 | 15 |
|
It's interesting to compare the content of women's responses and
men's responses to this note.
I wonder why it is that I am so much more interested in the "I know,
I've been there" replies?
It's funny to think how often I've wished I had just the sorts of
drugs you are given without asking, just so I could turn off those
terrifying feelings of rage and violence....
Maybe the Diary of a Mad Housewife isn't so far behind us after
all?
|
14.7 | Not direct experience but some help, I hope. | SCOTCH::GLICK | Fetching Down the Moon | Wed May 07 1986 10:01 | 22 |
| re .-1 Yep. I'll keep this non-experiential one short.
re .4 Comparing gender issues to racial issues is valid in some cases, but
I think in this case it is not. The anatomical, physiological gender
difference is far greater than the racial difference. This physical
difference has some (large/small?) impact on our psyches, and this fact
has been ignored by the largely male psychological community. Two well
documented (case histories, etc.) books on this general topic (not
Medication and women, but on the psychology of women) are Carol Gilligan's
In_A_Different_Voice and Anne Wilson Schaffe's Woman's_Reality. While you
may not agree with these books I think you will find them challenging and
stimulating considering the position you've taken.
All of the above does not address the predisposition of the medical
community to over medicate women, but they certainly helped give me some
new perspective on that and other related topics. These problems are not
chimeras, and they are not on the verge of disappearing; though its not my
place to say, feminism is at its best when it helps the victims (Women and
men) of these and other gender problems deal with the resulting trauma, and
when it struggles to prevent reoccurrence of preventable tragedy.
-Byron
|
14.8 | No drugs, please | STAR::JAMES | | Wed May 07 1986 13:49 | 17 |
| I am currently in therapy; I don't know if the particular association
(Acton Mental Health Association) is, in any way, affiliated with
the Woman's Therapy Movement. I see the social worker every week
for almost three years now, and if I had to summarize what it is
doing for me, I would have to answer that it is helping me take
control of my life, without drugs or crutches of any type. I have
had, and still have, in some measure, problems with alcohol, with
sexuality, with identity, with how to handle rage and frustration.
My social worker CANNOT prescribe drugs; in order to get them, I
would have to see the psychiatrist who is also a member of the staff.
Except for an initial encounter with "downs" (bad reaction and actually
counter-productive), it's been a long, sad, weekly journey into
myself. I wish there were a "magic" drug out there that I could
take instead of the incredibly hard work involved (not really 8^}).
It's hard, SCARY, and the rewards are long in coming, but when I
compare myself now to three years ago, there simply wasn't, and
still isn't, any other way to go.
|
14.9 | Misunderstanding | VAXUUM::DYER | Iceberg or volcano? | Wed May 07 1986 15:22 | 10 |
| [RE .4]: It's called the Women's Therapy Movement because
it was created by women, most of the professionals involved
with it are women, and it's based on the application of some
feminist ideas. It's not exclusively for women or about women.
Remember that I lament its not being made part of the main-
stream. If it were, it would revolutionize psychology for both
sexes. Also, remember that I (a man) am part of the movement -
I use its concepts as a rape crisis counselor, and they apply
very well to clients of either sex.
<_Jym_>
|
14.10 | Some Advice - And Free, At That! | LATOUR::TILLSON | | Fri May 23 1986 00:39 | 47 |
|
A couple of recommendations, both on prescription drugs, and on
therapy:
o Buy a copy of the PDR and look up any and all prescription medication
that your doctor gives you. Understand it for yourself. If your
doctor has been consistently negligent in explaining side effects,
drug interactions, or any other information that you find in the
PDR, get another doctor, immediately. I speak from experience.
I spent a couple of months on disability because I was prescribed
medications that were inappropriate and caused more problems than
they solved. If you have trouble finding a doctor who is competent
and sympathetic, call up the Boston Women's Health Collective
and ask for a recommendation.
o If you feel you would benefit from counciling (and most people
can), choose a licensed clinical psychologist or a licensed
clinical social worker. These people CANNOT prescribe drugs,
and rely on their personal sensitivity and understanding of
human psychology to aid people with their conflicts and problems.
Only psychiatrists can prescribe drugs as part of psychotherapy.
o Shop around for a therapist. Make a list of things that are
important to you - woman's rights, sexism, sexuality, the use
of drugs in therapy, religion - whatever. Make appointments
(try only one or two a week, otherwise you may experience some
burnout) with several therapists, as many as you need to find
someone you feel comfortable with. Explain to each that you
are interviewing therapists to find a suitable and comfortable
match for yourself. Ask about her/his opinions on each of the
subjects on your list. Ask about her/his therapeutic style and
and approach to psycotherapy. Ask about where each studied, what
they studied, and what they expect their patients to get out of
psychotherapy. Discuss your individual needs, what you expect
to accomplish or resolve, and whether your therapy will be ongoing
or short term. Ask anything you can think of. Any therapist
worth his or her salt will welcome such an approach. Do not stop
this process until you find someone really compatible.
I hope this helps - it is more than a little confusing to untangle
the web woven by the medical profession. Good luck to you all!
Rita
|
14.11 | Of babies and bathwater | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Wed May 28 1986 16:10 | 38 |
|
I don't disagree with anything that has been said so far about the
dangers of drugs. However, I'm afraid that a casual reader might get
the impression any therapy that includes drugs should be avoided at all
cost and this would surely be bad advice.
Lithium carbonate was the first commonly-available drug that affects
neurotransmitters, the brain chemicals that control the transmission of
neural signals. There are many new drugs of this general type, though
the specific neurotransmitter affected varies from drug to drug. No one
knows exactly how and why these drugs affect behavior, but indeed they
do. Such drugs have been said to be helpful in the treatment of various
forms of "clinical depression." There are a couple of excellent
articles on this subject in this week's Science News.
In essence, the article says that they tested four groups of clinically
depressed people. One group was treated with a placebo, one group with
the new drugs, one group with "cognitive therapy" (in which I gather
that the therapist tries to convince the patient that he/she is not
worthless), and one group with both drugs and cognitive therapy. The
course of treatment lasted for 16 weeks.
29% of the placebo group got better. ~60% of both the drug and therapy
groups got better. The results were not complete for the group that got
both drug and counseling therapy, but this group's preliminary results
were best of all.
Again, no one knows why these drugs work (but then, does anyone know why
psychoanalysis works?). Some patients respond to one drug but not to
another. Some patients don't respond to any drugs. But some patients
get better and I happen know one of them, which is why I brought the
subject up.
So, if you go to a doctor with a problem and s/he suggests that all you
need is a vial of valium and another of barbiturates, you probably want
to look elsewhere. But don't reject the use of all drugs out of hand.
JP
|
14.12 | Drugs Have Their Place, But Not As Life-Long Crutches | VAXUUM::DYER | Iceberg or volcano? | Thu May 29 1986 02:00 | 21 |
| [RE .11]: Depression is often long-lasting because it works
in a cycle: Something triggers the depression, and the depress-
ion triggers more depression. Lithium carbonate doesn't do any-
thing about the initial trigger; it simply suspends the feelings
of depression (and of anything else: anger, happiness, etc.).
This is a short-term solution, for the most part. Sure, you
can put people in a lab and administer the drug to them and have
them stop being depressed, but what happens when their feelings
start to function again? As a short-term solution, it *does*
have the very important effect of breaking the cycle, and that
can open the door to recovery.
Not everyone's going to walk through the door and down the
road by themself, though: many people need help, which usually
means getting at the problem that triggered the depression in
the first place. All too often the drugs just lead to a long-
term dependency on drugs: take them when you feel depressed
and then zombie out. Most of the people I've known who were
caught in this (rather expensive) cycle just get more depressed
(when they're not drugged, that is) because there's "something
wrong with them that they can't deal with without the drugs."
<_Jym_>
|
14.13 | Nutrition/Relaxation as Therapy for Depression | ADVAX::ENO | | Thu Nov 20 1986 15:49 | 12 |
| As a general note to anyone who is considering therapy for depression,
take an important step by examing your nutritional habits and your
activity level. I was in psychotherapy for a little over a year
with a wonderful (female) therapist, and the initial part of my
treatment for depression was adding vitamin supplements to my diet
and teaching me relaxation techniques. Because medical causes had
been excluded, and I knew (at least subconsciously) that my depression
was emotionally based, drug therapy was never considered.
My emotional problems were worked out via "talk therapy"; I learned
to accept certain emotional betrayals and face my anger. The vitamin,
relaxation and consistent exercise helped me get over the hump.
|
14.15 | Drugs come in bottles too! | USFHSL::ROYER | C.A.E. law and order...hold the mayo! | Mon May 18 1987 18:54 | 36 |
| I seem to be a latecommer to this file but I want to contribute
this anyway for what its worth.
I worked with a Pilot who had a problem, He drank to excess.
No person knew what was behind the problem. Later in counseling,
it was brought out that he had sever nightmares. He drank himself
to sleep by drinking until stupor arrived and when he sobered enough
he woke with nightmares and began his day. He spent less than
four hours in sleep each night 365/6 nights per year. He was a
physical wreck. Just able to maintain his liscense and rating.
(when sober he was a perfect pilot)
Hypnotism brought to light that he had been brutally raped by
a savage step-father. Being seven or eight years old he was
convinced that he was the one guilty of a "crime" and that
was what started the nightmares. He was sodemized and left
a bloody mess for several years..about age 11, when he ran
away from home. The doctor was able to supress these memories
after a few sessions and then able to remove the guilt associated
with the years of abuse.. now years later, this pilot does
not drink, is married, a responsible parent and flies for
a major airline.
The victim always needs support, understanding and loving
kindness without being made to feel that the whole thing
was their fault. PITY IS NOT NEEDED NOR CONDONED BY THOSE
WHO REALLY CARE. Drugs are no answer and the posibility
of peer counseling could have its value if not pushed at
the one in need. The victim needs help and the courts
often punish the guilty but not many care a damn about the
victim male or female. the victim is a person worth caring
for and we must do all we can to help.
thanks,
Dave
|
14.16 | depression | MEDUSA::KIFER | | Thu Sep 17 1987 14:07 | 6 |
| I found it hard to believe that this notes file hasn't been more
active. I'd be interested in hearing from other people who have
or are suffering from depression. The stance taken about the drugs
here is all well and fine and good but what happnes when the options
become either taking the prescribed medicine or going to the hospital?
To me that was not much of an option.
|
14.17 | medication can be a stepping stone | LEZAH::QUIRIY | Christine | Wed Sep 23 1987 23:21 | 51 |
|
Response .10 offers some really good advice on how to shop for a
therapist. Getting a therapist is the _best_ thing to do, I think,
and I can't add anything more to .10. So, I don't know how to
respond to you other than personally. In answer to your question:
"...what happens when the options become either taking
the prescribed medicine or going to the hospital?"
It's too bad there are (or were) only two options at the time, but
that is better than only having _one_ option, or having someone else
make the choice for you. If I was asking that question for myself,
I'd take the prescribed medicine, if the drugs would make it possible
for me to continue functioning at a minimum level. To me, "minimum
level" means "able to work" and therefore able to support myself.
I've done this in the past: when things got so bad that I wasn't able
to concentrate on my work, I went to my doctor, told him how I felt,
and asked him for what I needed. In one instance, it was tranquilizers.
In another it was sleeping pills to combat what I've learned is the
"classic" depressive-insomnia of being able to fall asleep, but waking
up in the very early morning hours (like 2 or 3) and not being able to
get back to sleep (till say, 6:00 or 7:00 -- when I was supposed to
be waking up).
My doctor once offered to prescribe anti-depressants, but I didn't
want to take them -- aside from my immediate suspicion at his readiness
to prescribe a mood-altering drug after only a brief office visit,
they seemed too heavy duty to me, and (more importantly at the time)
they wouldn't have provided the immediate relief I wanted. I'd waited
till I felt like I was coming out of my skin, a very weird and
uncomfortable feeling. My brain was going 'round an obsessive circular
course, and going round and round commanded all of my mental energies
and left me drained. Tranquilizers worked very well for me on the
short term. My mind may have been dulled, but dullness was heaven for
awhile, and it enabled me to do my job and take care of the day-to-day
tasks we all have to do -- laundry, eating, grocery shopping, putting
out the trash, getting up in the morning, facing little frustrations.
I was also able to find some enjoyment in things outside of myself.
And, look at issues calmly.
But, after visiting my doctor, I called the local mental health center
and made an appointment to talk to someone.
I think I've been depressed most of my life. I've heard and read
that depression "runs" in families, and I'm not one to disagree.
Whatever the cause, I've got a depressed aunt who spawned (at least)
one depressed child; a depressed mother with one depressed daughter;
my beloved grandmother was also depressed. I've finally come to the
realisation that therapy (for me) isn't just a short-term, crisis
oriented patch-me-up and put-me-back-together thing. I'm in it for
the long haul, now, and much better for it.
|
14.18 | | TLE::BRETT | | Sun Nov 22 1987 08:45 | 18 |
|
Jym - could you give the statistical basis for the claim that
1 out of every 3 women will be raped during their lifetime?
I'm reminded of the latest Hite report where she over-estimates
by (I think the NY Times or some such magazine decided) a factor
of ten the number of married women who had extra-marital sex (70%
instead of 7%). [The figures in this paragraph are based on reading
an article in the local paper a couple of weeks ago - the only fact
I am sure on is that it was a drastic overestimate, and the statistic
being measured].
Hite's "mistake" illustrates both the difficulties of getting accurate
measures in this area, and the potential benefits of getting them
wrong (in terms of publicity/interest aroused), and hence the need
for justifying any statistics such as 1-in-3.
/Bevin
|
14.19 | Jymmy done gone... | NEXUS::MORGAN | Contemplating a Wheaties Hell | Sun Nov 22 1987 14:45 | 5 |
| Reply to .18; Brett,
Jym left Digital about a year ago. The only place I've seen him
is on UseNet. Try soc.singles or soc.women if you want to get his
net address.
|
14.20 | Facts and Figures | CSC32::JOHNS | Yes, I *am* pregnant :-) | Sun Nov 22 1987 17:00 | 10 |
| /Bevin:
Just for your information, Jym was always very thorough, and anytime
he said something then it seemed he had good information to back
it up. I have heard the 1 in 3 figure several times before, so
it is not considered far off base, but it IS an estimate, since
so often sexual abuse is not reported. I believe the 1 in 3 figure
included both "sexual abuse" and rape (a crime of violence).
Carol
|
14.21 | 1 in 3, alas, is true. | HPSCAD::TWEXLER | | Wed Nov 25 1987 16:40 | 7 |
| I believe one source for those "1 in 3 women have been raped"
statistics come from the USA Department of Public Health. (And
I know I have heard those stats from other sources as well.)
The DPH supports many hotline crisis centers in Mass (and I assume
nationwide) and requires careful documentation of hotline calls.
Tamar
|
14.22 | For informations purposes | YAZOO::B_REINKE | where the sidewalk ends | Thu Nov 26 1987 17:50 | 4 |
| Does anyone know where lists of hotline crisis numbers for
rape and abuse situations can be found. I recently checked for
same out of curiousity and found that no such numbers are listed
as such in my phone book.
|
14.23 | one source of phone numbers | 38636::AUGUSTINE | | Mon Nov 30 1987 10:34 | 15 |
| I found a list of "Crisis" phone numbers in the first few pages
of the 1987-1988 Metrowest "Talking Phonebook" under Self-help
numbers (I suspect that other Boston Area phone books contain
similar pages). The organizations listed include:
an anorexia/bulimia center
AIDS action hotline
help for alcohol and drugs
child abuse / battered women
rape crisis
mspca
suicide
and more
liz
|
14.24 | in re .16; in which some 2nd hand information is offered | 3D::CHABOT | That fish, that is not catched thereby, | Mon Dec 07 1987 22:56 | 47 |
| I have a friend who (...no, really: no coverup here...) diagnosed
himself as clinically depressed (not just a phase), did a good deal
of reading up and discussing it, and decided to self-prescribe
l-tryptophan (which you can buy at a health food store).
I think it helped, but I don't recommend it, because
I cannot recommend self-prescriptions. In his case it wasn't quite
right, and he eventually sought a physician and was prescribed
er, a tri-cyclic, I think. The new medication was more effective,
but addictive (extreme nausea was the only withdrawal symptom I
can remember) and had a few other less disastrous but still
uncomfortable side-effects (dry mouth, for one, and of course you
can't take alcohol).
The side-effects and addiction were something he fought for awhile,
anyway--which I can understand, being an independent person fond
of my irregular habits.
He would talk about the problems and how the medication seemed to
lift a fog that had always obscured his vision, but people often
reacted badly. I believe that people don't want to talk about
depression, not only not their own, but other people's. Too often
it is implied that it is up to the individual to bootstrap themselves
up and out of it, almost as if it's their own fault that they haven't.
(While I agree that self-motivation has to play a part, depression
really isn't a forbidden sin that can't be discussed.) And people
are often treated as though it's contagious--isolate the sufferers,
and all that, make sure they have no responsibilities, as if
responsibilities are dangerous sharp objects and the sufferers are
tiny tots who don't know about sharp objects. Good grief,
responsibilities are what make life worth living. (Admittedly,
one can have too much of a good thing.)
Well, that was all about why people sometimes don't talk about their
depression--because they've learned it frightens people.
Is there really a choice between taking the medicine and going to
the hospital? I thought it was merely taking the medicine at home
or going to the hospital where they make sure you take the medicine.
Do what you have to. No amount of me telling you you're a fine person
is going to help much at all, I learned. I'm still likely to do
it, although I don't mean to annoy.
Of course, be wary of people lacking first hand knowledge. This
includes me, I must say. But people who haven't, often have all these
prejudices about what *they* would or would not do, and frankly,
how-the-heck would *they* know.
|
14.25 | | STOKES::WHARTON | | Mon Dec 14 1987 16:34 | 16 |
| re .24
Clinically depressed and l-tryptophan???
I remember during my senior year at school I had major sleeping
problems. I coudn't fall asleep until about 7 am and naturally I
couldn't wake up until 1 pm or so. I was sure that what I was
experiencing was my first psychotic break. So I went to the university
mental health clinic. He, the psychiatrist/psychologist, recommended
l-tryptophan to solve my sleeping problem. It worked. Since then
I always have a bottle hanging around the house for hard times.
Now that you've mentioned your self-diagnosed clinically depressed
friend you are scaring me.... :-) :-)
-karen
|
14.26 | lisa go boom | 3D::CHABOT | I have heard the VAXes singing, each to each. | Mon Dec 14 1987 18:19 | 11 |
| I've forgotten the mechanism, but somehow it affects firings.
It makes you sleepy too. I haven't tried it since the time I had
some annoying auditory hallucinations, but that could have
been due to lack of sleep and too much stress instead.
A glass of warm to hot milk probably has the right amount of l-tryptophan,
and it also works well. It's also probably hard to od. Glug, glug,
glug. :-)
Of course I don't drink the stuff myself--being lactose intolerant,
I'd probably explode! :-) :-)
|
14.27 | Other Side of the Coin | AQUA::WALKER | | Wed Jan 20 1988 13:38 | 10 |
| Re: 14.2
Just imagine what our working world would be like if the men in
the office were as a routine prescribed valium, anti-depressants,
sleeping pills, pain pills etc. all simultaneously! What would
happen to progress and accomplishments? If the men were drugged
and the women were alert what would the results be? Would the women
be obliged, to do a favor for, the men and take over and be management
because the men - poor helpless things - were incapable of doing
their job?
|
14.28 | Could Already Be Happening | FDCV03::ROSS | | Wed Jan 20 1988 14:38 | 13 |
| RE: .27
> Just imagine what our working world would be like if the men in
> the office were as a routine prescribed valium, anti-depressants,
> sleeping pills, pain pills etc. all simultaneously!
What makes you think that men, also, are not prescribed the same
regimen of medications?
Judging by *some* of the decisions of *some* of the powers-that-be,
perhaps that *is* the case. :-)
Alan
|
14.29 | | SUPER::HENDRICKS | The only way out is through | Wed Jan 20 1988 15:01 | 4 |
| Well, you probably haven't had the pleasure of speeding your brains
out on "FemCaps" 3 days a month :-)
:-(
|
14.30 | ques Q c'est | WHYVAX::KRUGER | | Thu Jan 21 1988 16:44 | 3 |
| What the heck is a FemCap? Details, please.
dov
|
14.31 | | SUPER::HENDRICKS | The only way out is through | Thu Jan 21 1988 17:05 | 11 |
| Tablets for PMS which you cannot buy over the counter, but which
most DEC Health Services offices in the northeast appear to carry.
They are the only PMS medication which allows me to forget that
it's that time of the month. The effect is like drinking a lot
of coffee, though, and if I forget and drink coffee while I am taking
them I kind of fly through my day...
Ingredients: Acetominophen, Caffeine, Ephedrine Sulfate, Adropine
Sulfate 1/2000 gr.
|
14.32 | my sympathies--ouch! | 3D::CHABOT | Rooms 253, '5, '7, and '9 | Fri Jan 22 1988 20:50 | 2 |
| Yeah, well, I had a friend who had to take speed (prescription).
Three days a month she couldn't sleep if she wanted to.
|