T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
536.1 | check for A01 fix | MOVMON::DAVIS | | Tue Mar 18 1997 10:14 | 11 |
| A01 revs should work, but you should make sure that a fix has been
implemented: cut of PIN 13 on E3 (23-239Y3-00) AS described in
Waiver # KZPDA-001 (which I don't have).
Also sounds like something else is wrong if you are killing boards just
by putting them in a particular slot. Not sure what is could be if the
Saddle has already been replaced.
The other caveat is only one KZPDA per IOD (PCI segment) is supported.
Todd
|
536.2 | | HARMNY::CUMMINS | | Tue Mar 18 1997 10:38 | 21 |
| Questions:
* What version(s) of SRM console firmware were on the system? i.e.
for both the initially-shipped system and for the replacement PCI
motherboard?
* Can you provide an SRM console SHOW CONFIG display? Most
importantly, what else is in IOD1's PCI bus? Any secondary VGAs?
* Just to confirm, you are saying you've seen two KZPDAs die as the
result of placing them in PCI1's bus 0 slot 3, each on a different
PCI motherboard? And a KZPAA works fine when in the same slot?
* Have you tried the KZPDA in PCI1 alone; i.e. with no other devices?
No ideas at this point. Would've suspected the Saddle myself. It should
be noted that spares are only Stage I tested and are not Stage II
tested, so it is possible you have a bad PCI motherboard spare. Still,
to have seen the *same* symptoms re: slot bus 0 3 with two different
PCI motherboards would seem to indicate that the PCI motherboard is
definitely not the problem here.
|
536.3 | Correct pin cut? Maybe not (+ more info)! | BRUNEL::KIRBY | | Tue Mar 18 1997 13:19 | 93 |
| Thanks for quick replies....
Re .2
=====
I can see a cut pin on the chip in question, but I am wondering if
Manufacturing have not cut the correct one!
Chamfer ------> 3 2 1 20 19
4 o 18
5 17
6 16
7 15
8 14
9 10 11 12 13
The above is my assumption (right or wrong) of the pin numbers on the chip,
with pin 1 being defined by the "o" in the encapsulation, as viewed from
above. The chamfered corner is between pins 3 & 4 as drawn.
If the above is correct then all my Rev A KZPDAs have pin 14 cut, not 13!
Can anyone confirm this?
========================
All 4 spares are from the same batch, origin Kanata, & are new build (not from
a repair centre) so they could all be wrong!
Re .3
=====
SRM was initially 3.0-10. Spare Saddle (PCI motherboard) was shipped at 2.0-3
and I have now upgraded to 3.0-10.
SHOW CONFIG is:- (typed in long-hand so format may be out)
BUS0 IOD0 (PCI0)
Slot Option Type Rev Name
1 PCEB 4828086 0005 PCEB0
2 S3 trio64/Trio62 88115333 0000 VGA0
BUS1 PCEB0 (EISA Bridge connected to IOD0 slot 1)
Slot Option Type Rev Name
<nothing>
BUS0 IOD1 (PCI1)
Slot Option Type Rev Name
1 NCR53C810 11000 0002 NCR0
2 DECHIP21140-AA 91011 0012 Tulip0
Slot 3 is where the KZPDA should be!
I've actually got 4 dead spare KZPDAs as a result of this (2 "blown"
in each motherboard, PCI1 Bus 0 Slot 3), plus the dead original. The KZPAA
however, and the DE500 for that matter, works in all slots. (Note all the
spare KZPDAs have the modification as above ... so maybe they are all
incorrect?)
Tried KZPDA initially in PCI1 slot 2 (nothing else in PCI1) and seemed to be
OK. The console came up OK and sized the device correctly. Move it up one to
slot 3, and dead.
My opinion/plan now:-
1) I am waiting for 2 more KZPDAs to arrive .... I will check them for rev
level etc.. If they are Rev A then I feel I need confirmation of the
"pin cut" before I try one in the system. If they are Rev B then I will risk
one immediately.
2) If 1) fails, then:- Replace the horse module (the IOD1/IOD0 bridge on
which I think the PCI drivers reside), the saddle (PCI motherboard) and the
KZPDA all in one go.
Any more thoughts?
Steve.
|
536.4 | E3 pin 14 should be cut | DANGER::HAYES | | Tue Mar 18 1997 17:19 | 31 |
|
Steve,
In the course of researching whether or not the correct pin was
cut for the Rev B01 5424739 I found conflicting information as
to which pin should be cut. An engineering memo that could have
been the technical source for the waiver that described the pin
cut had E3 pin 14 as the pin to cut. An ECO that mentioned the
pin cut but actually documented the Rev B module had E3 pin 13
as the pin to cut. Referring to the print set for the KZPDA
the correct pin to cut is E3 pin 14.
The Rev A01 module should have a pin cut on E3 pin 14 and the PAL
part number should be 23-239Y3-00. The PAL marking might
be truncated to 239Y3.
The Rev B01 module should have no pin cut and the E3 PAL should
be part number 23-309y3-00. The PAL marking might be truncated to
309Y3.
If the incorrect pin is cut there should be no adverse effect
on the module or the system. Pin 13 is the signal ~PCI_INTA
and pin 14 is ~PCI_INTB.
Your pin counting assumptions are correct. Of course we
would like to get this issue resolved.
Regards,
Dennis H.
|
536.5 | Fixed it! | BRUNEL::KIRBY | | Thu Mar 20 1997 12:55 | 20 |
| Re .4
Thanks for the detailed update, I can therefore confirm that my
KZPDA modules at revision A01 are built correctly, with pin 14 cut on the
correct PAL.
I have now got the system working ... the B3040-AA (horse) appears
to have been the culprit. This was "blowing" the KZPDAs when they were put
into IOD1 (PCI1) bus 0 slot 3 only!
I do not sufficiently understand the PCI to explain this, or why other
devices in that slot were undamaged. (The KZPDA is a PCI-PCI bridge device,
the others were not, probably relevent somehow!) The PCI motherboard B3050-AA
was undamaged, the original being back in the working system.
Again, thanks for your inputs. As this is a new product from
the MCS perspective we are only now starting to see any volume of faults.
Thus we are on the learning curve for the "quirks" of the products failures.
Steve.
|