T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
79.1 | Draft 1 | PERFOM::HENNING | | Tue May 28 1996 18:16 | 214 |
79.2 | Can the Bcache be taken out/disabled ?? | WBC::DOERING | Wash BM Center 339-5213 | Wed May 29 1996 15:43 | 11 |
79.3 | No way to disable b-cache; CPU_ENABLED feature for SMP scaling | LANDO::CUMMINS | | Wed May 29 1996 15:56 | 16 |
79.4 | | WBC::DOERING | Wash BM Center 339-5213 | Wed May 29 1996 16:37 | 7 |
79.5 | mixing CPU variants? | CUJO::SAMPSON | | Wed May 29 1996 20:31 | 5 |
79.6 | | LANDO::CUMMINS | | Wed May 29 1996 20:41 | 5 |
79.7 | Possible, but not recomended | STAR::jacobi.zko.dec.com::JACOBI | Paul A. Jacobi - OpenVMS Alpha Development | Fri May 31 1996 18:13 | 17 |
79.8 | | LANDO::CUMMINS | | Fri May 31 1996 18:22 | 4 |
79.9 | Sort of.. | VNASWS::ERIK | Erik A.Rosdol, ACT-IT Vienna, Austria | Mon Jun 17 1996 05:54 | 8 |
79.10 | i.e. no, it doesn't work... | USPS::FPRUSS | Frank Pruss, 202-232-7347 | Fri Jul 19 1996 22:00 | 5 |
79.11 | cacheless writeup ok to forward | PERFOM::HENNING | | Thu Oct 17 1996 12:01 | 4 |
79.12 | does the price make the performance reasonable? | TROOA::MSCHNEIDER | Nothing witty to say | Fri Nov 15 1996 18:20 | 9 |
79.13 | Change in cache RAM and Rawhide pricing | STAR::jacobi.zko.dec.com::jacobi | Paul A. Jacobi - OpenVMS Systems Group | Mon Nov 18 1996 12:58 | 14 |
79.14 | BCache RAM prices | POBOXB::STEINMAN | | Mon Nov 18 1996 16:03 | 14 |
79.15 | slower, but still viable? | TROOA::MSCHNEIDER | Nothing witty to say | Tue Nov 19 1996 08:18 | 11 |
79.16 | "slightly substantiated opinion" | DANGER::HAYES | | Tue Nov 19 1996 10:14 | 47 |
79.17 | Cacheless Rawhide vs Pentium Pro | STAR::jacobi.zko.dec.com::jacobi | Paul A. Jacobi - OpenVMS Systems Group | Tue Nov 19 1996 13:22 | 16 |
79.18 | PPro for UNIX or VMS? | TROOA::MSCHNEIDER | Nothing witty to say | Wed Nov 20 1996 00:02 | 3 |
79.19 | App Server vs DB Server | TROOA::NAISH | O�4ME Paul Naish DTN 631-7280 | Fri Nov 29 1996 12:46 | 11 |
79.20 | | AMCFAC::RABAHY | dtn 471-5160, outside 1-810-347-5160 | Wed Mar 05 1997 13:20 | 6 |
| re .5-.10:
There's an AlphaServer 4100 with two CPU's, one 5/300 and one 5/300E, running
Windows NT Server V4.0 as a demo system at a customer site. It appears to be
functioning correctly. Do we need to deal with this, or can it safely be left
as is for the duration of the demo?
|
79.21 | mixing not recommended | POBOXB::STEINMAN | | Wed Mar 05 1997 16:32 | 8 |
|
I would strongly recommend that you don't mix the CPU types. I
personally have seen this fail in the lab, although I've heard of many
reports that it does indeed work. We've performed no qualification of
this type of configuration, and seeing as it's a customer demo, it
isn't worth the risk of discovering any incompatibilities.
mo
|