T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
38.1 | | CIMCAD::PIERSON | I am the NRA | Tue Feb 06 1996 20:18 | 40 |
38.2 | | CIMCAD::PIERSON | I am the NRA | Tue Feb 06 1996 20:19 | 9 |
38.3 | | CIMCAD::PIERSON | I am the NRA | Tue Feb 06 1996 20:20 | 12 |
38.4 | | CIMCAD::PIERSON | I am the NRA | Tue Feb 06 1996 20:23 | 25 |
38.5 | | CIMCAD::PIERSON | I am the NRA | Tue Feb 06 1996 20:24 | 9 |
38.6 | | CIMCAD::PIERSON | I am the NRA | Tue Feb 06 1996 20:26 | 11 |
38.7 | A customer asks... | BBPBV1::WALLACE | buy, buy, Sooty | Fri Oct 25 1996 13:02 | 7 |
38.8 | | CIMCAD::PIERSON | | Fri Oct 25 1996 16:16 | 8 |
38.9 | | HELIX::SONTAKKE | | Fri Oct 25 1996 17:48 | 17 |
38.10 | | BBPBV1::WALLACE | buy, buy, Sooty | Fri Oct 25 1996 20:24 | 14 |
38.11 | We _are_ SBU now :-) | HELIX::SONTAKKE | | Fri Oct 25 1996 21:49 | 6 |
38.12 | Which SBC's and OS' use the accelerator? | CIMCAD::PIERSON | | Mon Dec 09 1996 20:23 | 10 |
38.13 | | SAYER::ELMORE | Steve [email protected] / 412-364-5893 | Mon Dec 09 1996 21:09 | 15 |
38.14 | | HELIX::SONTAKKE | | Tue Dec 10 1996 15:13 | 9 |
38.15 | accelerate the SBC??? | SAYER::ELMORE | Steve [email protected] / 412-364-5893 | Tue Dec 10 1996 15:46 | 15 |
38.16 | Sounds like an explanation... correct me if I'm wrong!!! | caly70.ayo.dec.com::Gordon | Gordon McNab | Tue Dec 10 1996 16:34 | 17 |
38.17 | | HELIX::SONTAKKE | | Tue Dec 10 1996 21:50 | 15 |
38.18 | | HELIX::SONTAKKE | | Tue Dec 10 1996 21:55 | 14 |
38.19 | re .-1 (was there a previous .18 too ?) | BBPBV1::WALLACE | No DTN. +44 860 675093 | Wed Dec 11 1996 12:05 | 15 |
38.20 | please be careful with current NT numbers | RTOEU::EGAUTHIER | AUA - Another Useful Abbreviation | Tue Dec 17 1996 08:18 | 259 |
38.21 | I will say it again | RTOEU::EGAUTHIER | AUA - Another Useful Abbreviation | Tue Dec 17 1996 08:40 | 13 |
38.22 | PCI timing clock needed | HELIX::SONTAKKE | | Thu Jan 09 1997 16:51 | 16 |
38.23 | | BBPBV1::WALLACE | A 4100? Yes sir, Dell or Digital? | Fri Jan 10 1997 10:49 | 1 |
38.24 | its a start | RTOEU::EGAUTHIER | AUA - Another Useful Abbreviation | Fri Jan 10 1997 12:25 | 17 |
38.25 | What NT performance report ? | BBPBV1::WALLACE | A 4100? Yes sir, Dell or Digital? | Fri Jan 10 1997 16:59 | 1 |
38.26 | | HELIX::SONTAKKE | | Fri Jan 10 1997 20:14 | 25 |
38.27 | | RTOEU::EGAUTHIER | AUA - Another Useful Abbreviation | Mon Jan 13 1997 10:11 | 8 |
38.28 | Offer of Encore card on short loan in UK | BBPBV1::WALLACE | john wallace @ bbp. +44 860 675093 | Fri Jan 17 1997 12:47 | 14 |
38.29 | Black Douglas for mine... | CIMCAD::PIERSON | | Fri Jan 17 1997 15:41 | 6 |
38.30 | Int Acc whitepaper arrived in IR | BBPBV1::WALLACE | john wallace @ bbp. +44 860 675093 | Fri Mar 21 1997 14:55 | 6 |
| The Interrupt Accelerator white paper is now in the IR.
Thank you!
regards
john
|
38.31 | one positive effect of branding procedures... | HELIX::CLARK | | Fri Mar 21 1997 16:03 | 13 |
| > -< Int Acc whitepaper arrived in IR >-
Yeah, Donna S. had to deliver it there for the March update of the OEM
InfoCenter -- along with another whitepaper (hard/soft), the Vx
performance report, and new data sheets for DECtalk/DMCC/VxWorks.
(The March update should go live in a week or so.)
Fyi, all such items have to exist in the Web IR before a corporate web
site can go live -- which is a good driver for getting them where they
belong in the first place...
(By contrast, a bunch of product doc is going on the OEM web site as well,
but it doesn't need to go in the Web IR.) - Jay
|
38.32 | Is this true? | BBPBV1::WALLACE | john wallace @ bbp. +44 860 675093 | Mon Mar 24 1997 21:17 | 6 |
| The new DMCC flyer (LI01GF in VTX IR) has this to say about the
interrupt accelerator (on p4, left of the OCP picture)
"Interrupt accelerator technology: Found on all DIGITAL backplanes,
this technology enables guaranteed PCI bus reads with two cycles when
coupled with Alpha SBCs."
|
38.33 | | CIMCAD::PIERSON | | Tue Mar 25 1997 18:47 | 26 |
| urrrrrmmmm.
It looks too loose to be true, but i could be missing summat without the
rest of the context.
What i would recognize as being 'true' would read more like:
> "Interrupt accelerator technology: Found on all DIGITAL backplanes,
> this technology enables guaranteed
IDENTIFICATION OF A PCI INTERUPT SOURCE WITHIN TWO
ISA bus
> bus reads
>when coupled with Alpha SBCs."
In other words, instead of having to 'poll' to determine the interupt
source, the SBC does two reads (to ISA space) & gets a bit map of who
is interupting.
[The plain, ordinary, PCI bus ASSUMES a 'poll for interupts' model,
as in a PC. DMCC backplanes allow that, to go along with x86 based
SBC's]
regards
dwp
|
38.34 | physical implementation information? | SAYER::ELMORE | Steve [email protected] 4123645893 | Wed Mar 26 1997 16:53 | 11 |
| I got a question from a customer (Lucent) asking about the physical
implementation of the Interrupt Accelerator. Ross Armstrong's white
paper doesn't discuss that (see page 7, Column 2, "Physical
Implementation" section): "This paper is not intended to imply any
particular physical implementation. the generic functionality..."
Is there anything I can share with this customer? Another paper?
Perhaps a description here?
Thanks,
Steve
|
38.35 | | HELIX::SONTAKKE | | Wed Mar 26 1997 21:49 | 9 |
| I recall seeing lot of information (an entire chapter devoted to
PCI Interrupt Controller) in the Hardware Reference Manual for the
Takara but that is still way off from being published.
The HRM for K2 has gone to SSB. My assumption is that the interrupt
accelerator information therein should be identical.
We also licence the technology in case Lucent wants to implement
it in in their backplanes.
|
38.36 | | CIMCAD::PIERSON | | Wed Mar 26 1997 23:11 | 5 |
| The implementation of most of the accelerator lives on the backplane.
Its in an FPGA, or two...
'other implemntations are possible' as the lawyers say...
regards
dwp
|
38.37 | wrong wrong wrong | RTOEU::EGAUTHIER | AUA - Another Useful Abbreviation | Thu Mar 27 1997 09:44 | 12 |
| > "Interrupt accelerator technology: Found on all DIGITAL backplanes,
> this technology enables guaranteed PCI bus reads with two cycles when
> coupled with Alpha SBCs."
I think what they mean is; interrupting device can be determined
within a guaranteed two [bus?] cycles.
Ross, are you out there?
In any case, what is written is incorrect.
-Eric
|
38.38 | Clarification | afirm1.ayo.dec.com::Gordon | Gordon McNab | Tue Apr 01 1997 16:59 | 8 |
| > I think what they mean is; interrupting device can be determined
> within a guaranteed two [bus?] cycles.
Two ISA bus read cycles.
Gordon
|